Bacteriologic and clinical evaluation of gowning in a premature nursery

Isolation gowns in health care settings: Laboratory studies, regulations and standards, and potential barriers of gown selection and use

Although they play an important role in infection prevention and control, textile materials and personal protective equipment (PPE) used in health care settings are known to be one of the sources of cross-infection. Gowns are recommended to prevent transmission of infectious diseases in certain settings; however, laboratory and field studies have produced mixed results of their efficacy. PPE used in health care is regulated as either class I (low risk) or class II (intermediate risk) devices in the United States. Many organizations have published guidelines for the use of PPE, including isolation gowns, in health care settings. In addition, the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation published a guidance document on the selection of gowns and a classification standard on liquid barrier performance for both surgical and isolation gowns. However, there is currently no existing standard specific to isolation gowns that considers not only the barrier resistance but also a wide array of end user desired attributes. As a result, infection preventionists and purchasing agents face several difficulties in the selection process, and end users have limited or no information on the levels of protection provided by isolation gowns. Lack of knowledge about the performance of protective clothing used in health care became more apparent during the 2014 Ebola epidemic. This article reviews laboratory studies, regulations, guidelines and standards pertaining to isolation gowns, characterization problems, and other potential barriers of isolation gown selection and use.

A Causal Link Between Handwashing and Risk of Infection? Examination of the Evidence

To examine evidence of a causal link between handwashing and risk of infection, a review of published literature from 1879 through 1986 was conducted. In the 107 years studied, 423 articles specifically related to handwashing were found. Articles were categorized as studies to evaluate products (50.8%), review articles (29.1%), behavioral studies (10.9%), methodologie studies (2.8%), studies linking handwashing to infection and other (3.1%). There was an increase in the proportion of handwashing articles published in the 1980s with the rate (9.4/105citations/year) being almost double that of any other period studied. Nonexperimental and experimental studies related to handwashing were reviewed and evidence for a causal association evaluated. Except for specificity, all the elements for causality, including temporality, strength, plausibility, consistency of the association, and dose response were present. It was therefore concluded that emphasis on handwashing as a primary infection control measure has not been misplaced and should continue.

Gowning by attendants and visitors in newborn nurseries for prevention of neonatal morbidity and mortality

BACKGROUND

Overgowns are widely used in newborn nurseries and neonatal intensive care units. It was thought that they may help to prevent the spread of nosocomial infection and serve as a reminder to staff and visitors to wash their hands before contacts with the infant.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effects of the wearing of an overgown by attendants and visitors for the prevention of infection and death in infants in newborn nurseries.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The standard methods of the Cochrane Collaboration and its Neonatal Review Group were used. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2002), MEDLINE (1966-January 2003) and CINAHL (1982-January 2003).

SELECTION CRITERIA

All published trials using random or quasi-random patient allocation, in which overgowns worn by attendants or visitors were compared with no overgowns worn by attendants or visitors.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The standard methods of the Cochrane Collaboration and its Neonatal Review Group were used. Data extraction and study quality were independently assessed by the two authors. Missing information was sought from three authors but only one responded. Results are expressed as relative risk or mean difference with 95% confidence intervals.

MAIN RESULTS

Eight trials were included, reporting outcomes for 3,811 infants. Trial quality varied; two were of good quality. Not wearing overgowns was associated with a trend to reduction in the death rate, typical RR 0.84 (95% CI 0.70, 1.02) compared to wearing overgowns, but these results did not reach statistical significance. There was no statistically significant effect of gowning policy on incidence of systemic nosocomial infection, typical RR 1.24 (CI 0.90,1.71). The overall analysis showed no significant effects of gowning policy on the incidence of colonisation, length of stay or handwashing frequency. No trials of visitor gowning were found.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

The evidence from this systematic review and meta analysis does not demonstrate that overgowns are effective in limiting death, infection or bacterial colonisation in infants admitted to newborn nurseries.

A review of single-use and reusable gowns and drapes in health care

Gowns and drapes are used widely in healthcare facilities. Gowns have been used to minimize the risk of disease acquisition by healthcare providers, to reduce the risk of patient-to-patient transmission, and during invasive procedures to aid in maintaining a sterile field. Drapes have been used during invasive procedures to maintain the sterility of environmental surfaces, equipment, and patients. This article reviews the use of gowns and drapes in healthcare facilities, including the characteristics, costs, benefits, and barrier effectiveness of single-use and reusable products. Currently, gowns protect healthcare personnel performing invasive procedures from contact with bloodborne pathogens. Although gowns have been recommended to prevent patient-to-patient transmission in certain settings (eg, neonatal intensive care unit) and for certain patients (eg, those infected with vancomycin-resistant enterococci), scientific studies have produced mixed results of their efficacy. While appropriate use of drapes during invasive procedures is recommended widely as an aid in minimizing contamination of the operative field, the efficacy of this practice in reducing surgical-site infections has not been assessed by scientific studies. Based on an evaluation of the functional requirements, environmental impact, and economics of gowns and drapes, clear superiority of either reusable or single-use gowns and drapes cannot be demonstrated. The selection of particular gowns and drapes by individual healthcare facilities requires an assessment of the facility's requirements, available products, and costs and should be based on the desired characteristics of an ideal gown or drape as defined in this paper.

Does routine gowning reduce nosocomial infection and mortality rates in a neonatal nursery? A Singapore experience

A 1 year prospective study on routine gowning before entering a neonatal unit was conducted in a maternity hospital in Singapore. This study was done based on previous work by Donowitz, Haque and Chagla and Agbayani et al., as there have been no known studies done in Singapore. The aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that routine gowning before entering a neonatal nursery does not reduce nosocomial infection and mortality rate. A total of 212 neonates from the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and 1694 neonates from the neonatal special care unit (NSCU) were studied. Neonates admitted during the 1 year study were assigned to the gowning (control) and no routine gowning (trial) group on every alternate 2 months. The hospital infection control nurse provided data on nosocomial infection. The overall nosocomial infection rate in the NICU was 24% (25 of 104 admissions) during gowning periods compared to 16.6% (18 of 108 admissions) when plastic aprons were not worn before entry. In the NSCU, the overall infection rate was 1.5% (12 of 800 admissions) during gowning periods compared to 2.1% (19 of 894 admissions) when no gown was worn before entry. Results of the study found no significant differences in the incidences of nosocomial infection and mortality in the neonates. The cost of gowns used during the no routine gowning periods was S$2012.8 compared to S$3708 used during the routine gowning procedure. The investigators recommend that routine gowning before entering a neonatal unit is not essential and cost effective for the purpose of reducing infection. Rather the focus should be on adequate handwashing by all hospital personnel and visitors before handling neonates.

Infection control and bone marrow transplantation

BACKGROUND

Bone marrow transplantation for the treatment of malignancies is on the increase. Unfortunately, there are no well-validated infection control guidelines for this highly susceptible population.

METHODS

Literature was reviewed concerning infection risks and interventions to decrease risks for bone marrow transplant recipients.

RESULTS

Definitive information was generally lacking. However, basic "common sense" infection control recommendations for bone marrow transplantation were made in the following areas: air ventilation systems, design issues, environmental services, patient care issues, barrier precautions, nosocomial surveillance, and discharge planning. Recommendations must be tailored to each facility or setting.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that validation of many of these recommendations is necessary to provide optimum care for bone marrow transplant recipients.

Neonatal sepsis and infection control policies in Australia

The pattern of neonatal bacterial infection, its management and the types of infection control policy were ascertained in 20 neonatal intensive care units (NICU) in Australia by questionnaire survey. Group B Streptococcus and Escherichia coli were the predominant organisms responsible for perinatally acquired infection for which the most common antibiotic combination used was Penicillin and Gentamicin. Staphylococcus epidermidis and aureus (majority Methicillin resistant) were the predominant organisms responsible for nosocomial infection for which the most common antibiotic combination used was Vancomycin and Cefotaxime. A Serratia epidemic was experienced in four NICU. Lumbar and suprapubic punctures were frequently done as part of the diagnostic workup in nosocomial infections but not with perinatally acquired infections. Haematological indices considered useful as a diagnosis aid varied between NICU and acute phase reactants were rarely relied upon for diagnosis or for monitoring treatment response. Granulocyte transfusion and intravenous immunoglobulins were infrequently used in therapy. No consensus was found on infection control policies. Eight NICU required routine gowning on entry, two restricted sibling visiting and four restricted visiting by relatives and friends. Although routine bacteriological surveillance on staff or equipment was uncommon, serial cultures were carried out in infants from the body surface in six NICU and from the endotracheal aspirate in 17 NICU. Antiseptics used with technical procedures included iodine, chlorhexidine and alcohol used singly or in combination. Skin and umbilical cord care also varied between NICU. The literature was reviewed to determine the effectiveness or otherwise of some of the existing policies in the prevention or management of neonatal infection to encourage consensus towards a more rational approach to neonatal infection in Australia.

A randomized controlled trial of a nursery ritual: wearing cover gowns to care for healthy newborns

The routine wearing of individual cover gowns by nurses and visitors for direct care of healthy newborns was usual practice on the maternity ward of a regional referral center. We conducted a randomized trial in which cover gowns were not provided for care of infants in the experimental group (n = 222), but were maintained for control infants (n = 230). The principal outcome measured was Staphylococcus aureus colonization of the newborn nares or umbilicus on day 3 or day of discharge. Twenty percent (n = 51) of the experimental group (no gown) had a positive culture compared with 21 percent (n = 47) of the controls. Of the infants with positive cultures, two in each group exhibited symptoms of overt S. aureus infection. Experimental infants were similar to controls with respect to feeding method, route of delivery, amount of time spent rooming-in, and average number of visitors per day. In the group of positively cultured infants, the mothers experienced longer labor, and more vaginal examinations in labor, and the number of males undergoing circumcision was higher. We concluded that routine use of cover gowns was unwarranted, and we have altered the ward policy accordingly. This also has had a positive economic effect.

Nosocomial infection in neonatal intensive care units

Nosocomial infection rates in neonatal intensive care units range from 5% to 25%. Both endemic and epidemic infections have been documented, with causative agents including gram-positive cocci, gram-negative bacilli, and viruses. This paper reviews the host, maternal, and environmental factors that influence susceptibility of neonates. Usual preventive measures, such as nursery design, staff apparel, handwashing, employee health, and neonatal care, as well as epidemic control measures to minimize infection risks and limit transmission of infectious organisms, are discussed.

Do gowns prevent infection in neonatal intensive care units?

In a prospective study we found that gowns had no effect when used by medical and paramedical staff, in reducing infection in a tertiary care neonatal unit. We conclude that the use of gowns in this area is an ineffective and expensive method of preventing nosocomial infection.

Reduction of nosocomial infection during pediatric intensive care by protective isolation

To determine whether simple protective isolation reduces the incidence of nosocomial bacterial and fungal infection during pediatric intensive care, we randomly assigned 70 children who were not immuno-suppressed and who required mechanical ventilatory support and three or more days of intensive care to receive standard care (n = 38) or protective isolation (n = 32) with use of disposable, non-waven, polypropylene gowns and nonsterile latex gloves. Risk factors predisposing patients to infection were comparable in the two groups. Nosocomial colonization occurred later among isolated patients (median, vs. 7 days; P less than 0.01) and was associated with subsequent infection in 12 patients, as compared with 12 patients given standard care (P = 0.01). Among patients who were isolated, the interval before the first infection was significantly longer than (median, 20 vs. 8 days; P = 0.04), the daily infection rate was 2.2 times lower than (95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 4.0; P = 0.007), and there were fewer days with fewer (13 percent vs. 21 percent; P = 0.001). The benefit of isolation was most notable after seven days of intensive care. Isolation was well tolerated by patients and their families. Regular monitoring showed that the children in each group were touched and handled comparably often by hospital personnel and family members. We conclude that the use of disposable, high-barrier gowns and gloves for the care of selected, high-risk children who require prolonged intensive care significantly reduces the incidence of nosocomial infection, is well tolerated, and does not compromise the delivery of care.

Rituals in infection control: what works in the newborn nursery?

Two infection control practices common in the newborn nursery, handwashing and gowning, are compared with regards to historic origins, effectiveness, and extent of practice. The practice of handwashing is the direct result of efforts to prevent puerperal sepsis and has been shown to be effective in reducing neonatal risk of infection. Gowning has evolved from operating room practices and has been shown to be generally ineffective in reducing risk of infant infection. Nevertheless, gowning is practiced extensively and handwashing is often omitted. Such rituals need occasional reexamination so that those practices associated with maximum effectiveness receive appropriate attention.

Bacterial colonization of newborn infants in a neonatal intensive care unit

The bacterial colonization of the nose, umbilicus, perineum and faeces in 85 newborns was studied during one period of high and one of low occupancy in a neonatal intensive care unit. Cultures were taken on admission, at three days, at one week of age, and then weekly during the stay in the unit. Colonization took place early and potential pathogens were responsible for a significant part of the spectrum. At one week of age, more than 50% of the infants had Staphylococcus aureus in the nose and umbilicus, 25% had E. coli and/or Klebsiella enterobacter in the umbilicus, and 60% had Klebsiella enterobacter in the perineum. Neither the occupancy rate in the unit nor the clinical state of the infant seemed to influence the colonization pattern significantly. Changes in flora were frequent in the individual infant. However, the bacterial spectrum remained essentially the same with increasing age during the stay in the unit and during the two periods. Only on two occasions was the same phage type of Staphylococcus aureus found in two infants at the same time. Two cases of septicemia occurred in the 85 infants during the three months of the study. Both infants were colonized beforehand with the causative organism. The results may indicate that the clinical state of the infant is of greater importance for risk of septicemia than the pattern of the bacterial colonization.

Parents' reactions to unrestricted parental contact with infants in the intensive care nursery

In order to determine parental attitudes and reactions to a policy in which the quality and quantity of parental contact with their preterm or critically-ill infants in the intensive care nursery were determined by the parents, 20 parental pairs were studied regarding their pattern of involvement with their infants, the emotional stress which they experienced, and their responses to the nursery environment during the first fortnight after their infants' birth. This study demonstrated that early and extended parent-infant contact was possible for infants admitted to the intensive care nursery. Both parents chose to maintain a high level of involvement with their infants despite the associated anxiety and anticipatory grief experienced during this period. All felt more reassured with repeated visits, and most believed their infants also felt more loved and secure with the increased contact. The majority would have been opposed to restricted visiting hours and restricted contact with their infants. An open visiting policy and an organized parental-care programme is an important component of neonatal intensive care, since every preterm or critically-ill infant has a family whose psychosocial needs must be recognized and supported.

Attempts to control clothes-borne infection in a burn unit, 2. Clothing routines in clinical use and the epidemiology of cross-colonization

Previous investigations have shown that cross-contamination in a burn unit is mainly clothes-borne. New barrier garments have been designed and tried experimentally. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of different clothing routines on cross-contamination. In a long-term study, the rates and routes of colonizations with Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus groups A, B, C, F, and G and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were examined. The exogenous colonization rates were, with S. aureus 77%, with Streptococcus species 52% and with Ps. aeruginosa 32%. The colonization rate with Ps. aeruginosa was higher in patients with larger burns. Patients dispersed Streptococcus and Ps. aeruginosa as well as S. aureus into the air of their rooms in considerable amounts, but dispersers were not more important as sources of cross-colonization than non-dispersers. In comparison of clothing routines, there was no difference in overall colonization rates. The newly designed barrier garment that was made from apparently particle-tight material did not reduce the transfer of bacteria from patient to patient. A less rigid routine than that previously used did not increase the risk of cross-contamination. A thorough change of barrier dress after close contact nursing delayed the first exogenous S. aureus colonization from day 6 to day 14 after admission. This routine might be recommended for clinical use. Otherwise, methods must be developed for adequate selection of materials intended for barrier garments.

Isolation care of infection-prone burn patients

An experimental and clinical study of spread of colonisation between burn patients, and their susceptibility to infection, was performed. Burn patients' polymorphonuclear neutrophil granulocytes (PMN) functioned poorly, particularly during the second week after injury which coincided with maximum growth of bacteria in the burn wound. Patients with large burns often dispersed S. aureus and Ps. aeruginosa but also beta-hemolytic Streptococcus to the air of their rooms. Airborne transfer of these bacteria was practically eliminated by nursing in single isolation rooms with plenum ventilation. In such rooms, cross-contamination was carried mainly via clothes. Patients with small burns sometimes were important sources of such contamination although they dispersed little bacteria to the air. A thorough change of barrier dress after close contact nursing delayed the first exogenous S. aureus colonisation until after the time of greatest impairment in PMN functions. A further reduction in cross-contamination would be possible with barrier garments impermeable to fluids and bacteria on points of contact, as shown in experiments with plastic apron as protective dress. Measurements of penetration through fabrics of particles suspended in air, commercially used, did not correlate to the performance of garments made from the fabrics in experimental nursing and clinical use. Bacteria were shown to penetrate fabrics through rubbing, particularly when wet where the microcolonies present on the cloth were separated into smaller units. An instrument was designed which measured such penetration, and was used to select fabrics for barrier garments. Tightly fitting barrier garments increased the disperal of bacteria from clothes worn underneath them. The wearing of barrier garments should therefore be restricted to close contact nursing. An open-roofed plastic patient isolator was designed and built. It did not appreciably reduce cross-contamination and gave psychological and practical problems. It seemed not to be a realistic alternative to better protective garments in isolation rooms.

Temporal study of the staphylococci and micrococci of normal infant skin

Staphylococcus and Micrococcus populations were collected from the healthy skin of 10 infant subjects. Infants were sampled from 1 day to 32 weeks of age. Species were characterized by approximately 30 different morphological, physiological, and biochemical characters. Staphylococci were the predominant inhabitants of normal skin, whereas micrococci were found only occasionally in this environment. Staphylococcus epidermidid, S. haemolyticus, and S. hominis were the predominant and persistent staphylococci. These species constituted a high percentage of the total aerobic bacterial flora of infant skin. Micrococcus luteus and M. kristinae were the prevalent micrococci found on infant skin. Only limited correlation between Staphyloccus and Micrococcus populations and infant age or body area sampled was indicated by this study.

Prevention of infection in nurseries for the newborn

Prevention of infection in nurseries involves consideration of the design of hospitals, wards and equipment, the study of nursing and domestic procedures, the monitoring of environmental flora and the planning of antiseptic and antibiotic policies. These subjects cannot be considered in isolation from each other and are most suitably managed by a Control of Infection Committee. Ultimately the safety of infants in nurseries rests upon the degree to which each individual involved in their care pays attention to the agreed policies of general and personal hygiene.