Possible indomethacin-aminoglycoside interaction in preterm infants

Drug Therapies Affecting Renal Function: An Overview

Undesirable side effects of medication are inevitable. Due to the role of the kidneys in clearance and filtration, the renal system faces a unique situation when it comes to the side effects of drugs. It has an important role for different classes of drugs to be excreted, and drugs are a key factor for this system to be at risk. Medications in articles were divided into classes using the standard set by the Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal. Many drug classes cause renal insults. The top six classes were pain killers, antibiotics, proton pump inhibitors, antidiabetics, antihyperlipidemics, and agents for erectile dysfunction. Renal insults caused by these agents could vary in severity. Some drugs could cause nephrotoxicity from one dose, while others may only need continuous monitoring. Different populations also operate under different rules, as some people need dose adjustments while others who are medically free of major illnesses do not. A variety of unfavorable outcomes for the kidney could take place, such as acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, and end-stage renal disease, and unfortunately, some of these issues could lead to the need for renal replacement therapies. The outcome of this review paper will help multidisciplinary physicians to understand the renal side effects of the most used drug classes in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, their destructive mechanisms, and most importantly, the clinical presentations of renal dysfunction in relation to each class. Emphasizing these adverse effects will prevent future unfavorable outcomes, especially in commonly used drugs that are frequently prescribed for different age groups. Moreover, some of these drugs are considered to be over-the-counter medications, which makes them a serious problem that needs to be handled cautiously.

Association between Nephrotoxic Drug Combinations and Acute Kidney Injury in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in infants exposed to nephrotoxic drug combinations admitted to 268 neonatal intensive care units managed by the Pediatrix Medical Group.

STUDY DESIGN

We included infants born at 22-36 weeks gestational age, ≤120 days postnatal age, exposed to nephrotoxic drug combinations, with serum creatinine measurements available, and discharged between 2007 and 2016. To identify risk factors associated with a serum creatinine definition of AKI based on the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes criteria, we performed multivariable logistic and Cox regression adjusting for gestational age, sex, birth weight, postnatal age, race/ethnicity, sepsis, respiratory distress syndrome, baseline serum creatinine, and duration of combination drug exposure. The adjusted odds of AKI were determined relative to gentamicin + indomethacin for the following nephrotoxic drug combinations: chlorothiazide + ibuprofen; chlorothiazide + indomethacin; furosemide + gentamicin; furosemide + ibuprofen; furosemide + tobramycin; ibuprofen + spironolactone; and vancomycin + piperacillin-tazobactam.

RESULTS

Among 8286 included infants, 1384 (17%) experienced AKI. On multivariable analysis, sepsis, lower baseline creatinine, and duration of combination therapy were associated with increased odds of AKI. Furosemide + tobramycin and vancomycin + piperacillin-tazobactam were associated with a decreased risk of AKI relative to gentamicin + indomethacin in both the multivariable and Cox regression models.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, infants receiving longer durations of nephrotoxic combination therapy had an increased odds of developing AKI.

Extended interval dosing of gentamicin in premature neonates ≤ 28-week gestation

AIM

To evaluate an extended interval dosing (EID) regimen of gentamicin in neonates ≤28-week gestation.

METHODS

In 2008, an EID regimen for gentamicin was introduced for all neonates admitted to the NICU in Calgary. The dosing interval was based on a 22 h level after the first dose of 5mg/kg. We conducted an observational study in 33 infants ≤28-week gestation on the EID regimen from the first day of life and compared gentamicin peak and trough levels with a historical control of 34 infants who received gentamicin in a dose of 2.5 mg/kg every 24 h (TID, traditional interval dosing).

RESULTS

In the EID group, based on the 22 h level, dosing interval was 36 h in 20 neonates and 48 h in 13 neonates. All neonates, except one, achieved therapeutic peak and trough levels. Compared to the TID group, the EID group had higher peak levels (median 9.8 μg/mL vs. 4.6 μg/mL, p < 0.001) with no difference in trough levels. With target peak levels of 5-12 μg/mL and trough levels of <2 μg/mL, a higher proportion of neonates in the TID group would need dose adjustment.

CONCLUSION

In neonates ≤ 28-week gestation, an EID regimen from day one of life, using a single level 22 h after the first dose for dosing interval, achieves therapeutic peak and trough levels and more optimum peak levels as compared to a TID regimen.

Accuracy of Empiric Gentamicin Dosing Guidelines in Neonates

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the accuracy of a neonatal gentamicin nomogram to achieve therapeutic gentamicin serum concentrations without further adjustment, allowing for decreased serum drug monitoring

METHODS

Retrospective single center review of all gentamicin pharmacokinetic evaluations in patients ≤ 30 days of life from July 2005 – June 2007. Patients were evaluated for postnatal age, gestational age, weight, serum creatinine, dose/interval, serum drug peaks and troughs, results of discharge hearing test and recent use of indomethacin. Logistic regression was utilized to determine potential factors impacting overall dosing accuracy, potentially allowing for decreased therapeutic drug monitoring. Factors found to be significant were incorporated into new guidelines which were evaluated through pharmacokinetic modeling.

RESULTS

Overall accuracy rate was 84% when empiric dosing guidelines were utilized; 16% of all doses were changed due to supratherapeutic troughs and 1% were changed due to subtherapeutic peaks. Variables found to impact the necessity for dose changes incuded gestational age (p≤0.001), weight (p≤0.001), indomethacin use (p≤0.001), number of indomethacin doses used (p≤0.001 and p=0.009 for 1–3 and 4–6 doses, respectively), and SCr in patients ≥ 7 days old (p=0.028); however, only gestational age remained a significant predictor when all other factors were considered (p=0.008). The current guidelines were changed to account for increased troughs in patients ≤ 28 weeks gestation and examined through pharmacokinetic modeling. Pharmacokinetic modeling of the new guidelines predicted an overall accuracy of 94%.

CONCLUSIONS

From the data gathered regarding the accuracy in patients ≥ 35 weeks gestation, we recommend to decrease therapeutic drug monitoring within this cohort. Utilizing the results of regression analysis, the current guidelines have been adjusted to allow for increased clearance in patients ≤ 28 weeks gestation, although they still need to be prospectively evaluated.

Efecto de la administración concomitante de indometacina o ibuprofeno en la farmacocinética de amikacina en neonatos prematuros

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether the concomitant administration of ibuprofen or indomethacin plus amikacin may alter the latter drug s pharmacokinetic parameters, and hence amikacin plasma levels.

METHOD

Retrospective cohort study performed by reviewing the medical records of premature children with persistent ductus arteriosus receiving amikacin and ibuprofen, or amikacin and indomethacin. They were divided up into three groups: group 1: treatment with amikacin went before indomethacin or ibuprofen; group 2: simultaneously treated with amikacin and indomethacin; group 3: simultaneously treated with amikacin and ibuprofen. Pharmacokinetic parameters, distribution volume, and amikacin clearance were measured using the PKS program (a non-linear regression method). Half life was determined from previous parameters.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients were included. No statistically significant differences were found among pharmacokinetic parameters corresponding to each study group.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies are needed with a greater number of patients and currently recommended doses to assess the influence of indomethacin and ibuprofen in the pharmacokinetics of amikacin in premature children with persistent ductus arteriosus.

Pharmacokinetics of oleandomycin in dogs after intravenous or oral administration alone and after pretreatment with metamizole or dexamethasone

The pharmacokinetics of oleandomycin (OLD) after intravenous and oral administration, both alone and after intramuscular pretreatment with metamizole or dexamethasone, were studied in healthy dogs. After intravenous injection of OLD alone (10 mg/kg as bolus), the elimination half-life (t 1/2 beta, volume of distribution (Vd,area), body clearance (ClB) and area under the concentration time curve (AUC) were 1.60 h, 1.11 L/kg. 7.36 (ml/kg)/min and 21.66 microg h/ml, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences following pretreatment with metamizole or dexamethasone. After oral administration of OLD alone, the t 1/2 beta, maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax), time of Cmax (tmax), mean absorption time (MAT) and absolute bioavailability (Fabs) were 1.6 h, 5.34 microg/ml, 1.5 h, 1.34 h and 84.29%, respectively. Pretreatment with metamizole caused a significantly decreased value for Cmax (2.93 microg/ml) but the MAT value (2.23 h) was significantly increased. Statistically significant changes in the pharmacokinetic parameters of OLD following oral administration were also observed as a result of pretreatment with dexamethasone. The Cmax was increased (8.24 microg/ml) and the tmax (0.5 h) and MAT (0.45 h) were lower.

Antibiotics in neonatal infections: a review

The bacteria most commonly responsible for early-onset (materno-fetal) infections in neonates are group B streptococci, enterococci, Enterobacteriaceae and Listeria monocytogenes. Coagulase-negative staphylococci, particularly Staphylococcus epidermidis, are the main pathogens in late-onset (nosocomial) infections, especially in high-risk patients such as those with very low birthweight, umbilical or central venous catheters or undergoing prolonged ventilation. The primary objective of the paediatrician is to identity all potential cases of bacterial disease quickly and begin antibacterial treatment immediately after the appropriate cultures have been obtained. Combination therapy is recommended for initial empirical treatment in the neonate. In early-onset infections, an effective first-line empirical therapy is ampicillin plus an aminoglycoside (duration of treatment 10 days). An alternative is ampicillin plus a third-generation cephalosporin such as cefotaxime, a combination particularly useful in neonatal meningitis (mean duration of treatment 14 to 21 days), in patients at risk of nephrotoxicity and/or when therapeutic monitoring of aminoglycosides is not possible. Another potential substitute for the aminoglycoside is aztreonam. Triple combination therapy (such as amoxicillin plus cefotaxime and an aminoglycoside) could also be used for the first 2 to 3 days of life, followed by dual therapy after the microbiological results. In late-onset infections the combination oxacillin plus an aminoglycoside is widely recommended. However, vancomycin plus ceftazidime (+/- an aminoglycoside for the first 2 to 3 days) may be a better choice. Teicoplanin may be a substitute for vancomycin. However, the initial approach should always be modified by knowledge of the local bacterial epidemiology. After the microbiological results, treatment should be switched to narrower spectrum agents if a specific organism has been identified, and should be discontinued if cultures are negative and the neonate is in good clinical condition. Penicillins and third-generation cephalosporins are generally well tolerated in neonates. There is controversy regarding whether therapeutic drug monitoring of aminoglycosides will decrease toxicity (particularly renal damage) in neonates, and on the efficacy and safety of a single daily dose versus multiple daily doses of these drugs. Toxic effects caused by vancomycin are uncommon, but debate still exists over the need for therapeutic drug monitoring of this agent. When antibacterials are used in neonates, accurate determination of dosage is required, particularly for compounds with a low therapeutic index and in patients with renal failure. Very low birthweight infants are also particularly prone to antibacterial-induced toxicity.

Pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in rabbits pretreated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: an interaction study

Interaction between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and other drugs occurs relatively frequently because of the wide use of NSAIDs. Such interactions with drugs of narrow therapeutic index used in serious disease states may lead to toxicity. Gentamicin toxicity is based on its concentration in serum, and any alteration in pharmacokinetic parameters may lead to gentamicin accumulation in the body and subsequently to severe nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity. To test this hypothesis, the effect of pretreatment with NSAIDs on gentamicin pharmacokinetics was examined in rabbit. Gentamicin sulfate (5 mg/kg) was administered to rabbits pretreated with aspirin (300 mg/kg), ketorolac tromethamine (3 mg/kg), ibuprofen (20 mg/kg), and piroxicam (2 mg/kg) twice a day for 1 week. The pretreatment with NSAIDs had significant effects on the body clearance and maximum concentration. Aspirin, piroxicam and ketorolac tromethamine pretreatment had significant effects on the area under the curve of gentamicin versus time. Aspirin and ketorolac tromethamine pretreatment had significant effects on the half-life of gentamicin. Aspirin had a significant effect on the volume of distribution of gentamicin. These results suggest that pretreatment with NSAIDs alters the pharmacokinetics of gentamicin and leads to accumulation inside the body, which could result in toxicity.

Drug disposition in neonates with patent ductus arteriosus

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature on the physiologic changes created by neonatal patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) and the potential impact on drug disposition in these infants.

DATA SOURCES

An Index Medicus and bibliographic search of the English-language literature pertaining to neonatal PDA and drug usage in newborns.

DATA SYNTHESIS

PDA in premature infants is associated with a variety of physiologic changes that could alter drug disposition. Perfusion of drug-elimination organs (i.e., liver and kidney) may be diminished, resulting in decreased drug elimination. Further, the general fluid overload state associated with PDA may result in larger volumes of distribution (Vd), and dilutional effects for many drugs. Drug absorption, Vd, tissue penetration, and clearance may be affected by the physiologic changes incurred by a PDA. Although the pharmacokinetics of several categories of therapeutic agents may be affected by a PDA, disposition changes with the aminoglycosides and indomethacin have been the best documented. The most reliable pharmacokinetic change appears to be related to drug Vd. The interpretation of many of these studies is confounded by a potential drug interaction with the concurrent administration of indomethacin for PDA closure.

CONCLUSIONS

Close therapeutic drug monitoring is indicated in newborns with PDAs as abrupt changes in drug disposition can occur with PDA closure. PDA-induced changes in specific pharmacokinetic parameters of agents such as the aminoglycosides, indomethacin, and perhaps vancomycin may prove to be a valuable diagnostic adjunct for the identification of babies with undiagnosed PDA. More research into this pharmacophysiologic aspect of pharmacokinetics is warranted.

The problems and pitfalls of NSAID therapy in the elderly (Part II)

The elderly are most susceptible to pharmacokinetic drug interactions between various NSAIDs and anticoagulants, sulphonylurea hypoglycaemic agents, certain anticonvulsants, methotrexate, digoxin, aminoglycosides and lithium. Pharmacodynamic interactions between some NSAIDs and antihypertensive drugs, anticoagulants, sulphonylurea agents and other NSAIDs are also potentially significant in the elderly. Despite the finding that mean therapeutic responses of large groups of patients have been generally equivalent for the wide range of NSAIDs studied thus far, it is also apparent that marked variability exists in the response of individual patients to different NSAIDs. Subsequent dosage increments may predispose 'nonresponders' and some less sensitive 'responders' to toxicity from NSAIDs. This interindividual variability in response to NSAIDs may be contributed to by the differing physicochemical properties of NSAIDs, physician prescribing habits and patient expectations, variations in NSAID pharmacokinetics, and the differing effects of NSAIDs other than their common ability to inhibit prostaglandin synthesis. The principles for drug prescribing in the elderly are no different from those that should be applied to the prescribing of medication in any patient. The clinician should strive to make a diagnosis and should avoid treating symptoms in isolation. Critical assessment of the indication for prescribing NSAID therapy must include consideration of the available effective and safe alternatives. If an NSAID is commenced the lowest effective dose should be the desired goal, but after an appropriate trial it is acceptable clinical practice to employ an alternative NSAID. There is no justification for combination NSAID therapy. The progress of each patient must be carefully monitored, particularly during the first few months of treatment, while periodic review of the ongoing need for the NSAID is essential.

The effect of phenylbutazone on the plasma disposition of penicillin G in the horse

A pilot study in two ponies showed that the plasma concentrations of intramuscularly administered procaine penicillin were higher if phenylbutazone was administered concurrently. In two other trials, each involving five horses, intravenous sodium penicillin was administered with and without concurrent intravenously injected phenylbutazone, and procaine penicillin was injected intramuscularly with and without oral phenylbutazone. In both cases the plasma concentrations of penicillin were higher when phenylbutazone was given. The pharmacokinetic parameters indicated that the effect was probably due to a lower peripheral distribution because the penetration of penicillin into the tissues was greatly reduced.

Clinical pharmacology and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

This review informs clinicians about current clinical usage and pharmacokinetics of newer NSAIDs and aspirin. To understand the effects of these drugs, a review of prostaglandin synthesis and actions is provided.

The nephrotoxic potential of drugs and chemicals. Pharmacological basis and clinical relevance

Scores of drugs in common clinical use are capable of inflicting various degrees of damage to the kidney. Similarly, a large number of widely employed chemicals may adversely affect renal tissue as part of their toxic potential. A xenobiotic may damage the kidney by more than one mechanism. For example, NSAIDs may cause decreased renal perfusion, interstitial nephritis, primary glomerulopathy and/or altered potassium homeostasis. A large number of drugs and chemicals inflict their damage on the renal tubular cell secondary to intracellular accumulation to concentrations substantially higher than in the plasma or in other tissues. These include aminoglycosides, mercury and carbon tetrachloride and cephaloridine. Drug-induced interstitial nephritis is characterised by inflammatory lesions of the renal interstitium developed after at least 7 to 10 days of therapy. The immunological nature of this reaction is suggested by the associated fever, maculopapular rash and arthralgia observed in some of the patients. Although eosinophilia, eosinophiluria, and raised blood IgE levels are characteristic, immunoglobulins are not deposited in renal tissue, and the basic mechanism has not been elucidated. Renal biopsy demonstrates oedema and interstitial inflammatory reaction, mainly with lymphocytes, monocytes, eosinophils and plasma cells. Less frequent, vasculitis of small vessels or granulomatous reaction may develop, leading to necrotising glomerulonephritis. The drugs most commonly causing acute interstitial nephritis are methicillin, ampicillin, cephalosporins, rifampicin (rifampin), sulphonamides, phenindione and allopurinol. Other penicillins, NSAIDs, phenytoin, thiazides and frusemide (furosemide) are less frequently associated with this syndrome. Drugs and chemicals may affect renal function by pharmacologically decreasing glomerular filtration rate and/or renal blood flow. These include the NSAIDs, radiological contrast media and cyclosporin. Normal renal function depends upon an intact glomerular apparatus. Many drugs and chemicals are capable of damaging the glomerulus, causing its increased permeability to large molecules such as proteins. Several drugs including d-penicillamine, thiopronine, captopril, pyrithioxine and methimazole, are believed to exert their damage through their sulfhydryl group which bind with high affinity to glomerular structures. A variety of xenobiotics or their metabolites may be deposited in the renal tubule causing obstruction of urine flow and a secondary damage to tubular epithelium. Sulphonamides, methotrexate and ethylene glycol are good examples.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Interactions of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

As NSAIDs are commonly used in patients receiving concomitant drug therapy, there is a risk of clinically significant drug interactions. Important interactions with NSAIDs involve one or both of two major mechanisms: pharmacokinetic (e.g. lithium, phenytoin and barbiturates) and pharmacodynamic (e.g. antihypertensive agents, diuretics). Prescription of a NSAID should be preceded by a careful evaluation of any coexisting pathology (such as renal dysfunction or hypertension) or concurrent drug therapy (such as anticonvulsant or anticoagulant agents) which may predispose a patient to the development of an interaction with potentially severe effects.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in neonates: problems and issues

Therapeutic drug monitoring has been applied in several patient populations to promote safer, more effective use of drugs. The development of therapeutic ranges allows clinicians to aim for a plasma drug concentration that is usually safe and effective, and calculation of specific pharmacokinetic parameters allows selection of doses that will achieve the desired plasma concentration. This concept certainly holds true in the intensive care nursery; however, the intensity of monitoring in this setting provides opportunities for far broader applications of the information obtained from drug concentration monitoring. This review provides an overview of the complexity of and potential applications for therapeutic drug monitoring in neonates based on literature and clinical experience.

Aminoglycoside toxicity in infants and children

The aminoglycosides are frequently prescribed for infants and children, especially newborn infants with suspected or documented sepsis or meningitis. In older infants and children, the aminoglycosides are commonly used to treat acute respiratory exacerbations in patients with cystic fibrosis, intra-abdominal sepsis, complicated urinary tract infections, and other infections caused by gram-negative enteric bacilli. Although these drugs are generally well tolerated and efficacious, there is relatively little information on toxicity in pediatric patients. The potential for ototoxicity from the aminoglycosides, especially streptomycin, kanamycin, and gentamicin, was evaluated in seven prospective, controlled studies of 1,321 newborn infants. Although the designs and follow-up periods were different among the studies, the audiometric tests were similar and appropriate for age. Three studies measured auditory brain stem response during the neonatal and early infancy periods. With the exception of one study, ototoxicity occurred less frequently in aminoglycoside-treated patients than it did in untreated control patients. One study from Canada demonstrated abnormal brain stem response audiograms in gentamicin- or tobramycin-treated neonates compared with normal brain stem response audiograms in untreated control subjects. That study, however, was flawed by the small number of patients evaluated and the lack of follow-up of any patients. Nephrotoxicity appears to be rare in neonates, although one study in this age group showed an elevated N-acetyl-beta-glucosaminidase excretion rate in gentamicin-treated infants compared with rates in infants treated with amikacin or chloramphenicol. In that study, no attempt was made to correlate lysosomal injury with clinical or conventional laboratory evidence of nephrotoxicity. The toxicity of the aminoglycosides in older infants and children has not been adequately assessed. The broadest experience with these compounds has been in patients with cystic fibrosis, and most open studies in these patients have indicated a relative lack of ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity. It should be emphasized, however, that the standard dosage of aminoglycosides in patients with cystic fibrosis frequently results in serum concentrations that are lower than anticipated because of a relatively larger volume of drug distribution and a greater urinary excretion rate. The lack of reports on aminoglycoside-associated toxic effects in children suggests that these compounds are safe and well tolerated in this age group.