Energy expenditure, energy balance, and composition of weight gain in low birth weight infants fed diets of different protein and energy content

Higher versus lower protein intake in formula-fed low birth weight infants

BACKGROUND

The ideal quantity of dietary protein for formula-fed low birth weight infants is still a matter of debate. Protein intake must be sufficient to achieve normal growth without leading to negative effects such as acidosis, uremia, and elevated levels of circulating amino acids.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether higher (≥ 3.0 g/kg/d) versus lower (< 3.0 g/kg/d) protein intake during the initial hospital stay of formula-fed preterm infants or low birth weight infants (< 2.5 kilograms) results in improved growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes without evidence of short- or long-term morbidity. Specific objectives were to examine the following comparisons of interventions and to conduct subgroup analyses if possible. 1. Low protein intake if the amount was less than 3.0 g/kg/d. 2. High protein intake if the amount was equal to or greater than 3.0 g/kg/d but less than 4.0 g/kg/d. 3. Very high protein intake if the amount was equal to or greater than 4.0 g/kg/d.

SEARCH METHODS

We used the standard search strategy of Cochrane Neonatal to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2019, Issue 8), in the Cochrane Library (August 2, 2019); OVID MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE(R) Daily, and Ovid MEDLINE(R) (to August 2, 2019); MEDLINE via PubMed (to August 2, 2019) for the previous year; and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (to August 2, 2019). We also searched clinical trials databases and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included RCTs contrasting levels of formula protein intake as low (< 3.0 g/kg/d), high (≥ 3.0 g/kg/d but < 4.0 g/kg/d), or very high (≥ 4.0 g/kg/d) in formula-fed hospitalized neonates weighing less than 2.5 kilograms. We excluded studies if infants received partial parenteral nutrition during the study period, or if infants were fed formula as a supplement to human milk.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane and the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified six eligible trials that enrolled 218 infants through searches updated to August 2, 2019. Five studies compared low (< 3 g/kg/d) versus high (3.0 to 4.0 g/kg/d) protein intake using formulas that kept other nutrients constant. The trials were small (n = 139), and almost all had methodological limitations; the most frequent uncertainty was about attrition. Low-certainty evidence suggests improved weight gain (mean difference [MD] 2.36 g/kg/d, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31 to 3.40) and higher nitrogen accretion in infants receiving formula with higher protein content (3.0 to 4.0 g/kg/d) versus lower protein content (< 3 g/kg/d), while other nutrients were kept constant. No significant differences were seen in rates of necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis, or diarrhea. We are uncertain whether high versus low protein intake affects head growth (MD 0.37 cm/week, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.58; n = 18) and length gain (MD 0.16 cm/week, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.34; n = 48), but sample sizes were small for these comparisons. One study compared high (3.0 to 4.0 g/kg/d) versus very high (≥ 4 g/kg/d) protein intake (average intakes were 3.6 and 4.1 g/kg/d) during and after an initial hospital stay (n = 77). Moderate-certainty evidence shows no significant differences in weight gain or length gain to discharge, term, and 12 weeks corrected age from very high protein intake (4.1 versus 3.6 g/kg/d). Three of the 24 infants receiving very high protein intake developed uremia.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Higher protein intake (≥ 3.0 g/kg/d but < 4.0 g/kg/d) from formula accelerates weight gain. However, limited information is available regarding the impact of higher formula protein intake on long-term outcomes such as neurodevelopment. Research is needed to investigate the safety and effectiveness of protein intake ≥ 4.0 g/kg/d.

Does Amount of Protein in Formula Matter for Low-Birthweight Infants? A Cochrane Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

High protein intake may be associated with negative consequences such as acidosis, uremia, and elevated levels of circulating amino acids (eg, phenylalanine levels). We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials to determine whether formula-fed low-birthweight infants could tolerate protein intakes>or=3.0 g/kg/d in their initial hospital stay, without adverse consequences.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials contrasting levels of protein intakes as low (<3.0 g/kg/d), high (>or=3.0 g/kg/d but <4.0 g/kg/d), or very high protein intake (>or=4.0 g/kg/d) while other nutrients were held constant, were identified through a systematic search of the literature. Standard methods of the Cochrane Collaboration were used by 2 independent reviewers, with the third reviewer facilitating consensus decision making.

RESULTS

A meta-analysis of 5 randomized trials indicated improved weight gain (weighted mean difference [WMD] 2.36 g/kg/d; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-3.40) and higher nitrogen accretion (WMD 143.7 mg/kg/d; 95% CI 128.7-158.8) with high (>or=3.0 g/kg/d but <4.0 g/kg/d) compared with low (<3.0 g/kg/d) protein intakes while other nutrients were kept constant. No data were available for IQ or Bayley scores at 18 months or later or for very high protein intakes (>or=4.0 g/kg/d). No significant differences were seen in rates of necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis, or diarrhea.

CONCLUSIONS

Accelerated weight and nitrogen accretion were noted with higher protein intakes in "healthy" formula-fed low-birthweight infants. This benefit could not be weighed against the adverse consequences of elevated blood urea nitrogen levels and increased metabolic acidosis and neurodevelopmental abnormalities.

Exploration of the Contribution of Biobehavioral Variables to the Energy Expenditure of Preterm Infants

Variation in energy expended by preterm infants may be due to infant maturity and history of resolved acute lung disease (respiratory distress syndrome [RDS]) as well as growth, caloric intake, and activity. Indirect calorimetry was used in this exploratory, short-term longitudinal study to estimate energy expenditure (EE) from measures of inspired and expired O2 and CO2 .The sample included 35 assessments for 10 preterm infants (5 with and 5 without RDS history). Lung disease history (resolved RDS, no RDS diagnosis), weight gain (g/d) from the day on which birth weight had been regained to the study day, mean activity level, the number of the assessment (1 6), and the interaction of lung disease history and time were included in a linear mixed model for repeated measures. Time was an index of postconceptional and postnatal age; all 3 were highly correlated. Because of high correlation with weight gain, caloric intake was not included in the analytic model. Lung disease history, mean activity level, and time were significant contributors to EE. A more precise measure of medical status than absence or presence of lung disease history, evenly spaced repetitions of EE assessment, and exploration of contexts in which the infants exhibit a higher activity level are needed in a replication study with a larger sample.

A systematic review of controlled trials of lower-protein or energy-containing infant formulas for use by healthy full-term infants

Infant formulas have historically been developed based on providing macronutrients at intake concentrations approximately matching the composition of human milk. In most countries, targets of 1.4-1.5 g of protein/dL and 20 kcal/oz (67-68 kcal/dL) have been set as the protein and energy concentrations for formulas during the first year of life, although this may be an overestimation of these contents. Recent introduction of lower-protein and -energy formulas in full-term infants led us to systematically review the literature for its effects on growth. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, our inclusion criteria were studies that enrolled healthy full-term infants and evaluated lower-protein or lower-energy formula, reported anthropometric outcomes including weight and length, and followed infants for at least 6 mo. Six studies were eligible for inclusion. These studies varied in the content of nutrients provided in the intervention and control groups, by additional dietary components in the study groups, and the timing and length of the intervention, which limit their usefulness for interpreting newly introduced lower-protein and -energy formulas in the United States. These studies suggest adequate growth during infancy and early childhood with infant formulas with concentrations of protein and energy slightly below historical standards in the United States. Further long-term research is needed to assess the impact of the use of lower-protein and/or lower-energy products, especially for nutritionally at-risk populations such as preterm infants and infants who are born small for gestational age.

Optimum feeding and growth in preterm neonates

Approximately 10% of all babies worldwide are born preterm, and preterm birth is the leading cause of perinatal mortality in developed countries. Although preterm birth is associated with adverse short- and long-term health outcomes, it is not yet clear whether this relationship is causal. Rather, there is evidence that reduced foetal growth, preterm birth and the long-term health effects of both of these may all arise from a suboptimal intrauterine environment. Further, most infants born preterm also experience suboptimal postnatal growth, with potential adverse effects on long-term health and development. A number of interventions are used widely in the neonatal period to optimise postnatal growth and development. These commonly include supplementation with macronutrients and/or micronutrients, all of which have potential short-term risks and benefits for the preterm infant, whereas the long-term health consequences are largely unknown. Importantly, more rapid postnatal growth trajectory (and the interventions required to achieve this) may result in improved neurological outcomes at the expense of increased cardiovascular risk in later life.

Higher versus lower protein intake in formula-fed low birth weight infants

BACKGROUND

The ideal quantity of dietary protein for formula-fed low birth weight infants is still a matter of debate. Protein intake must be sufficient to achieve normal growth without negative effects such as acidosis, uremia, and elevated levels of circulating amino acids.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether higher (≥ 3.0 g/kg/d) versus lower (< 3.0 g/kg/d) protein intake during the initial hospital stay of formula-fed preterm infants or low birth weight infants (< 2.5 kilograms) results in improved growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes without evidence of short- and long-term morbidity.To examine the following distinctions in protein intake. 1. Low protein intake if the amount was less than 3.0 g/kg/d. 2. High protein intake if the amount was equal to or greater than 3.0 g/kg/d but less than 4.0 g/kg/d. 3. Very high protein intake if the amount was equal to or greater than 4.0 g/kg/d.If the reviewed studies combined alterations of protein and energy, subgroup analyses were to be carried out for the planned categories of protein intake according to the following predefined energy intake categories. 1. Low energy intake: less than 105 kcal/kg/d. 2. Medium energy intake: greater than or equal to 105 kcal/kg/d and less than or equal to 135 kcal/kg/d. 3. High energy intake: greater than 135 kcal/kg/d.As the Ziegler-Fomon reference fetus estimates different protein requirements for infants based on birth weight, subgroup analyses were to be undertaken for the following birth weight categories. 1. < 800 grams. 2. 800 to 1199 grams. 3. 1200 to 1799 grams. 4. 1800 to 2499 grams.

SEARCH METHODS

The standard search methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group were used. MEDLINE, CINAHL, PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; The Cochrane Library) were searched.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials contrasting levels of formula protein intake as low (< 3.0 g/kg/d), high (≥ 3.0 g/kg/d but < 4.0 g/kg/d), or very high (≥ 4.0 g/kg/d) in formula-fed hospitalized neonates weighing less than 2.5 kilograms were included. Studies were excluded if infants received partial parenteral nutrition during the study period or were fed formula as a supplement to human milk. Studies in which nutrients other than protein also varied were added in a post-facto analysis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group were used.

MAIN RESULTS

Five studies compared low versus high protein intake. Improved weight gain and higher nitrogen accretion were demonstrated in infants receiving formula with higher protein content while other nutrients were kept constant. No significant differences were seen in rates of necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis, or diarrhea.One study compared high versus very high protein intake during and after an initial hospital stay. Very high protein intake promoted improved gain in length at term, but differences did not remain significant at 12 weeks corrected age. Three of the 24 infants receiving very high protein intake developed uremia.A post-facto analysis revealed further improvement in all growth parameters in infants receiving formula with higher protein content. No significant difference in the concentration of plasma phenylalanine was noted between high and low protein intake groups. However, one study (Goldman 1969) documented a significantly increased incidence of low intelligence quotient (IQ) scores among infants of birth weight less than 1300 grams who received a very high protein intake (6 to 7.2 g/kg).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Higher protein intake (≥ 3.0 g/kg/d but < 4.0 g/kg/d) from formula accelerates weight gain. However, limited information is available regarding the impact of higher formula protein intake on long-term outcomes such as neurodevelopmental abnormalities. Available evidence is not adequate to permit specific recommendations regarding the provision of very high protein intake (> 4.0 g/kg/d) from formula during the initial hospital stay or after discharge.

Higher protein intake improves length, not weight, z scores in preterm infants

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to evaluate the relation between nutritional intake (kilocalories, protein) and weight and length growth in preterm infants, and to describe their metabolic tolerance with a focus on those with high protein intake (≥ 4.6 g · kg(-1) · day(-1)).

METHODS

Secondary analysis of data from appropriate-for-gestational age preterm infants in a 28-day randomized clinical trial that evaluated growth, tolerance, and safety of a new ultraconcentrated liquid human milk fortifier (original study n = 150). This subset of 56 infants had complete growth and nutrition data and met criteria for the original study's "efficacy analysis" (eg, >80% of kilocalorie intake from study diet). Nutritional intake was estimated, not actual. Regressions were used to test cumulative kilocalories and protein as the predictors of 28-day change in weight and length z scores (growth status), and to evaluate protein tolerance.

RESULTS

Average intake was 118 ± 8 kcal · kg(-1) · day(-1) and 4.3 ± 0.4 g protein · kg(-1) · day(-1), with 16 ± 3 g · kg(-1) · day(-1) and 1.1 ± 0.2 cm/week growth for 28 days. Cumulative total kilocalories and protein were significant predictors of improved length z score (P = 0.0054, 0.0005) but not weight z score change. Regression models indicated that protein not kilocalories explained the improvement in length z score, with protein explaining 19% of the variability. The high protein group averaged 4.6 to 5.5 g · kg(-1) · day(-1) (n = 16). Protein tolerance was adequate for all of the study infants based on metabolic measures (blood urea nitrogen, serum carbon dioxide, pH).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher cumulative protein intake was tolerated and overall lessened the commonly occurring decline in the length but not weight growth status in a 28-day study of preterm infants.

Infant formulas for preterm infants: in-hospital and post-discharge

The availability and composition of preterm and post-discharge formulas (PDFs) have undergone considerable changes over the last decade. Human milk, supplemented with multi-component fortifier, is the preferred feed for very preterm infants as it has beneficial effects for both short- and long-term outcomes compared with formula. If supply of mother's milk or donor milk is inadequate, a breast milk substitute specifically designed for premature infants is the next option. Preterm formula is intended to provide nutrient intakes to match intrauterine growth and nutrient accretion rates and is enriched with energy, macronutrients, minerals, vitamins, and trace elements compared with term infant formulas. Post-natal longitudinal growth failure has been reported almost universally in extremely preterm infants. Since 2009, a nutritionally enriched PDF specifically designed for preterm infants post hospital discharge with faltering growth has been available in Australia and New Zealand. This formula is an intermediary between preterm and term formulas and contains more energy (73 kcal/100 mL), protein (1.9 g/100 mL), minerals, vitamins, and trace elements than term formulas. Although the use of a PDF is based on sound nutritional knowledge, the 2012 Cochrane Systematic Review of 10 trials comparing feeding preterm infants with PDF and term formula did not demonstrate any short- or long-term benefits. Health professionals need to make individual decisions on whether and how to use PDF.

Diet, sensitive periods in flavour learning, and growth

Diet in early infancy has an impact on early growth and the formation of flavour preferences, as well as on later life health outcomes. Although breast milk is the preferred source of nutrition during infancy, more than half of American infants receive infant formula by the age of 4 months. As a group, formula-fed infants weigh more by the age of one year and have a greater risk for later obesity than breastfed infants. However, a recent randomized study found that, when compared to breastfed infants, infants fed an extensively hydrolysed protein formula (ePHF) had more normative weight gain velocity than infants fed cow's milk formula (CMF). Therefore, grouping all formula-fed infants together with respect to certain health outcomes such as obesity may not be appropriate. Scientific evidence also suggests that there are sensitive periods for flavour learning. Infants become familiar with and learn to accept the flavours they experience through their mother's amniotic fluid and breast milk as well as formula. These early experiences influence flavour preferences of children that may affect food choices and therefore later life health. Further research on the influence of early diet on growth, flavour preferences, and food choices is imperative.

Differential growth patterns among healthy infants fed protein hydrolysate or cow-milk formulas

OBJECTIVE

Infant formulas differ considerably in composition and sensory profiles. In this randomized study, we examined whether healthy infants fed an extensively protein hydrolysate formula (PHF) would differ in feeding behavior and growth from those fed cow-milk formula (CMF).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Infants were randomly assigned to be fed CMF or PHF between 0.5 and 7.5 months of age. Each month for 7 months, infants were weighed and measured and then videotaped while being fed their assigned formula. Anthropometric z scores were calculated by using World Health Organization growth standards. Multilevel linear growth and piecewise mixed-effects models compared trajectories for growth measures and formula acceptance.

RESULTS

When compared with infants fed CMF, infants fed PHF had significantly lower weight-for-length z scores across ages 2.5 to 7.5 months. There were no differences in length-for-age z scores, which indicate that group differences resulted from gains in weight, not length. Infants fed PHF also had significantly slower weight gain velocity compared with infants fed CMF. During the monthly assessments, PHF-fed infants consumed less formula to satiation than did CMF-fed infants across the study period. Maternal ratings of infants' acceptance of the formula did not differ at any age.

CONCLUSIONS

z-score trajectories indicate that CMF-fed infants' weight gain was accelerated, whereas PHF-fed infants' weight gain was normative. Whether such differences in growth are because of differences in the protein content or amino acid profile of the formulas and, in turn, metabolism is unknown. Research on the long-term consequences of these early growth differences is needed.

Randomized trial of enteral protein and energy supplementation in infants less than or equal to 1250 g at birth

OBJECTIVE

To determine if enteral protein and energy supplementation would significantly improve weight gain as compared with energy supplementation alone in <or=1250 g infants.

STUDY DESIGN

Inclusion criteria were birth weight (BW) <or=1250 g, postnatal age >or=14 days, diet of >or=75% enteral nutrition (fortified human milk or formula) and either failure to regain BW or weight gain<15 g kg(-1) per days. Infants were randomized to a multinutrient supplement that provided increased protein and energy (P/E) intake or energy alone (medium chain triglyceride oil, MCT). Growth rates were compared at the end of the 4-week study period.

RESULT

Of 30 eligible infants, 23 were enrolled, 12 received MCT (BW=862+/-252 g, mean+/-s.d.) and 11 received P/E (BW=879+/-241 g). Significantly higher protein intake (P/E=3.5+/-0.3 g kg(-1) per day, MCT=3.0+/-0.5 g kg(-1) per day) and better growth (P/E=17.0+/-2.4 g kg(-1) per day, MCT=11.5+/-4.8 g kg(-1) per day) were observed in the P/E group.

CONCLUSION

These data are consistent with the importance of providing additional daily protein intake to achieve increased postnatal growth in very low birth weight infants experiencing slow growth.

Enteral intake for very low birth weight infants: what should the composition be?

Providing optimal nutrition to satisfy the growth needs of very low birth weight infants is critical. The available preterm formulas and fortified human milk diets provide protein intakes of approximately 3.5 to 3.6 g/kg/d when volumes sufficient to provide 120 kcal/kg/d are fed to these infants. These intakes support growth and protein accretion at about or slightly greater than intrauterine rate and lead to relatively increased fat deposition. However, most very low birth infants fed these diets remain below the 10th percentile of the intrauterine growth standards at discharge. There is clear evidence that, with respect to growth, very low birth infants are likely to benefit from a higher protein intake; however, there is no clear evidence that energy intakes greater than 120 kcal/kg/d are needed. Although the upper limit of protein intake and the ideal protein:energy ratio remain controversial, there is enough evidence to support the beneficial and safe use of formulas providing protein:energy ratio of 3.2 to 3.3 g/100 kcal.

Can extrauterine growth approximate intrauterine growth? Should it?

Most studies evaluating the growth of preterm infants use the so-called intrauterine growth curve and reference fetus as standards. These curves might not be the optimal standards, however, for several reasons. The curves were constructed from small numbers of infants with uncertainty about gestational age, reasons for preterm birth, and, for body-composition data, the reasons for the death of the infant. Second, preterm infants after birth are not comparable with fetuses, being in a completely different environment and receiving a completely different nutrition. For instance, a higher percentage of body fat in preterm infants might well be an adequate adaptation to their environment. To get preterm infants to adhere to their supposed growth curve percentile, catch-up growth is needed. Recent studies indicate that catch-up growth might be advantageous for brain development. It might at the same time increase the incidence of cardiovascular disease in later life. The use of intrauterine growth curves to evaluate postnatal growth needs a critical reevaluation.

Growth and development in a heliox incubator environment: a long-term safety study

BACKGROUND

Neonates exposed to mechanical ventilation may develop bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). BPD neonates exhibit a 25-30% increase in energy expenditure which may decrease the rate of growth and development. Heliox has been shown to improve pulmonary function and may decrease energy expenditure. We hypothesized that heliox would provide a safe environment for sustained growth and development.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety of the heliox environment we observed developmental milestones; recorded changes in weight, total length, limb length and head circumference; measured blood chemistries; compared primary organ and muscle weights, and analyzed muscle enzymatic activity.

DESIGN/METHODS

Four-day-old rabbit pups (n = 27) were randomized into control (21% O(2); 79% N(2)) or heliox (21% O(2); 79% He) groups, then raised for 14 days at 26.7 degrees C and 50% relative humidity. Pups were euthanized on day 14, blood drawn and primary organs, diaphragm and gastrocnemius weighed and snap-frozen.

RESULTS

All pups thrived in both environments, achieving expected developmental milestones. There were no physiologically significant group differences in weight, growth factors, tissue weight, blood chemistry or muscle enzyme activity.

CONCLUSIONS

No observed long-term differences in growth or development. RESULTS demonstrated that long-term heliox exposure is safe in this rabbit model. These data suggest that heliox administration may provide time for pulmonary improvement in the BPD population, warranting appropriate clinical trials.

A prototype infant incubator for heliox therapy

Heliox (Hx) gas has been shown to improve pulmonary function in infants, but methods for its delivery are invasive and problematic. To this end, we modified an Isolette (Hill-Rom Air-Shields) infant incubator (Hxl) to deliver Hx respiratory gas mixtures noninvasively while providing thermal stability for neonatal care in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). In vitro tests and in vivo animal studies were performed to compare the original design specifications and established baseline performance criteria for the Hxl design. The experimental environments at 50% and 80% relative humidity (RH) consisted of helium (He) with 21% and 50% O2 and control (C) of 21% and 50% O2 with the balance nitrogen (N). Elapsed times to steady state (SS) and recovery time back to SS (OCDss) due to opening and closing the door were recorded for each variable. All rabbits survived and appeared comfortable during all experimental conditions. These data show that the newly designed Isolette provides similar thermal, O2, CO2, and RH responses as the control incubator. Based on these positive safety/efficacy studies, study of the therapeutic impact of Hxl care on neonatal growth and development is in progress.

Higher versus lower protein intake in formula-fed low birth weight infants

BACKGROUND

The ideal quantity of dietary protein for formula-fed low birth weight infants < 2.5 kilograms is still a matter of controversy and debate. In premature infants, the protein intake must be sufficient to achieve normal growth without negative effects such as acidosis, uremia, and elevated levels of circulating amino acids (e.g. phenylalanine levels). This systematic review evaluates the benefits and risks of higher (>= 3.0 g/kg/day) versus lower (< 3.0 g/kg/day) protein intakes during the initial hospital stay of formula-fed preterm infants < 2.5 kilograms.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether higher (>= 3.0 g/kg/day) versus lower (< 3.0 g/kg/day) protein intakes during the initial hospital stay of formula-fed preterm infants < 2.5 kilograms result in improved growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes without evidence of short and long-term morbidity.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Two review authors searched MEDLINE (1966 - May 2005), CINAHL (1982 - May 2005), PubMed (1966 - May 2005), EMBASE (1980 - May 2005), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2005), abstracts, conferences and symposia proceedings from Society of Pediatric Research, and American Academy of Pediatrics. Cross references were reviewed independently for additional relevant titles and abstracts for articles up to fifty years old.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials contrasting levels of formula protein intakes as low (< 3.0 g/kg/day), high (=> 3.0 g/kg/day but < 4.0 g/kg/day), or very high protein intake (=> 4.0 g/kg/day) during hospitalization of neonates less than 2.5 kilograms at birth who were formula-fed. Studies were not included if infants received partial parenteral nutrition during the study period or were fed formula as a supplement to human milk. Given the small number of studies that met all inclusion criteria, studies in which nutrients other than protein also varied (> 10% relative difference) were added in a post-facto analysis.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors used standard methods of the Cochrane Collaboration and of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group to independently assess trial eligibility and quality, and extracted data. In a 3-arm trial where two groups fell within the same predesignated protein intake group, weighted means and pooled standard deviations were calculated.

MAIN RESULTS

The literature search identified 37 studies, of which five met all the inclusion criteria. All five studies compared low (< 3.0 g/kg/day) to high protein intakes (=> 3.0 g/kg/day but < 4.0 g/kg/day). The overall analysis revealed an improved weight gain (WMD 2.36 g/kg/day, 95% CI 1.31, 3.40) and higher nitrogen accretion (WMD 143.7 mg/kg/day, 95% CI 128.7, 158.8) in infants receiving formula with higher protein content while other nutrients were kept constant. None of the studies reported IQ or Bayley scores at 18 months or later. No significant differences were seen in rates of necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis or diarrhea. Of three studies included in the post-facto analysis, only one could be included in the meta-analysis. The post-facto analysis revealed further improvement in all growth parameters in infants receiving formula with higher protein content (weight gain: WMD 2.53 g/kg/day, 95% CI 1.62, 3.45, linear growth: WMD 0.16 cm/week, 95% CI 0.03, 0.30, and head growth: WMD 0.23, 95% CI 0.12, 0.35). There was no significant difference (WMD 0.25, 95% CI -0.20, 0.70) in the concentration of plasma phenylalanine between the high and low protein intake groups. One study (Goldman 1969) in the post-facto analysis documented a significantly increased incidence of low IQ scores, below 90, in infants of birth weight less than 1300 grams who received a very high protein intake (6 to 7.2 g/kg/day).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review suggests that higher protein intake (=> 3.0 g/kg/day but < 4.0 g/kg/day) from formula accelerates weight gain. Based on increased nitrogen accretion rates, this most likely indicates an increase in lean body mass. Although accelerated weight gain is considered to be a positive effect, increase in other outcome measures examined may represent a negative or ambivalent effect. These include elevated blood urea nitrogen levels and increased metabolic acidosis. Limited information was available regarding the impact of higher formula protein intakes on long term outcomes such as neurodevelopmental abnormalities. As determined in this review, existing research literature on this topic is not adequate to make specific recommendations regarding the provision of very high protein intake (> 4.0 g/kg/day) from formula.

Protein requirements in preterm infants: effect of different levels of protein intake on growth and body composition

This study compares growth and body composition in preterm infants (< or =1750 g birth weight, < or =34 wk gestation) fed three iso-caloric formulas (80 kcal/100 mL) with different protein concentrations (A = 3.3 g/100 kcal, B = 3.0 g/100 kcal, C = 2.7 g/100 kcal). The study began when full enteral feeding (150 mL/kg/d) was established and lasted until term plus 12 wk corrected age (T + 12 wca). Nutrient intake was closely monitored throughout the study; daily during initial hospital stay and following discharge averaged between each clinic visit. Anthropometry and serum biochemistries were determined weekly during initial stay and at each clinic visit. Body composition was measured after hospital discharge and at T + 12 wca. Seventy-seven infants were recruited. No differences were detected in birth/enrollment characteristics between the groups. Protein intake was closely paralleled by changes in serum urea nitrogen and differed between the groups. Infants in group A were heavier and longer and had greater head circumference at discharge, but this was confounded by a slightly older corrected age in this group. There were no significant anthropometric differences at term or T + 12 wca. No differences were detected in body composition between the groups following discharge or at T + 12 wca. An intake of 3.3 g/100 kcal appears safe and may promote increased growth before initial hospital discharge. After discharge, intakes greater than 2.7 g/100 kcal do not appear to offer clear advantage. Further studies are needed to more precisely define protein requirements in these nutritionally at-risk infants.

Dietitian Involvement in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: More Is Better

OBJECTIVE

Describe the level of registered dietitian (RD) involvement in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and associations with NICU nutrition practices.

DESIGN

Questionnaires were mailed to 820 NICUs in the United States with two follow-up mailings to nonresponders. Abbreviated phone surveys were conducted with a random sample of 10% of nonresponders. A nutrition care score was devised based on a sum of 10 survey questions (range 0 to 10) to summarize the intensity of reported practices.

SUBJECTS/SETTING

Directors of NICUs in the United States and RDs associated with them.

STATISTICAL ANALYSES

Chi2, analysis of variance, Bonferroni and Duncan multiple range tests, regression.

RESULTS

Respondents from 417 (54%) of the 772 NICUs eligible for the study provided completed questionnaires. Among NICUs responding, 76% involved RDs in care (41% employed full- or part-time RDs, 35% employed consult RDs), and 24% had no RD. NICUs with full- or part-time RDs provided fewer kilocalories and more protein parenterally, and more kilocalories and protein enterally. NICUs with less RD involvement were more likely to provide full-term infant feedings (eg, unfortified breast milk, full-term formula) to very-low-birth-weight infants. Mean nutrition care score varied with RD involvement from 4.6+/-1.7 (mean+/-standard deviation) for NICUs with a consult RD and 4.7+/-1.4 for NICUs employing no RD to 5.6+/-1.7 for NICUs with a full- or part-time RD (overall P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS

More involvement of RDs in NICUs increased the intensity of important aspects of nutrition care that may improve outcomes of very-low-birth-weight infants in NICUs. These findings highlight the importance of RDs as NICU team members.

Energy intake, metabolic balance and growth in preterm infants fed formulas with different nonprotein energy supplements

OBJECTIVE

To study metabolic and energy balances, growth and composition of increased body mass in healthy preterm infants fed control formula or control formula with three different nonprotein energy supplements.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Growing preterm infants (birth weight < 1,500 g and gestational age < 31 weeks) were fed standard preterm formula (control group) or the same formula enriched with three different nonprotein energy supplements. An energy supplement of 23 kcal/kg/day was achieved by adding medium-chain triglyceride and dextrinomaltose in three different caloric ratios: 33:66 in group A, 66:33 in group B, and 85:15 in group C. Energy balance was determined by open-circuit continuous (5-6 hours) measurements of energy expenditure, with simultaneous measurement of 24-hour urinary nitrogen excretion. Metabolic balance was determined by measurements of energy intake, energy oxidation, and energy output in urine and stool. The composition of body mass accretion was determined as the accretion of fat and protein in the total weight gain.

RESULTS

The fat accretion (4.9, 5.9, 6.2, and 3.8 g/kg/day in groups A, B, C and D, respectively) correlated directly with fat intake. Infants receiving standard energy intake had a fat percentage of weight gain significantly lower (28%) than that of the high-energy intake groups (31%, 40%, and 38% in groups A, B, and C, respectively). This difference corresponded to the results obtained from skinfold thickness measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

Excess nonprotein energy is stored as fat regardless of its source (fat or carbohydrate). High caloric and medium-chain triglyceride intake in otherwise healthy growing preterm infants does not promote nitrogen retention.

Influence of different types of post-discharge feeding on somatic growth, cognitive development and their correlation in very low birthweight preterm infants

The influence of appropriate post-discharge nutrition on somatic growth and cognitive development of very low-birthweight infants in the first year of life is currently a major topic in infant nutrition. Appropriate intakes of proteins, iodine and the addition of LC-PUFAs (arachidonic acid (AA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)) in the "right" quantities improve cognitive development and are conducive to a good correlation between somatic growth and neurodevelopment.

CONCLUSION

When mother' milk is not available post-discharge, in addition to more proteins and minerals, formula for low-birthweight infants should contain AA and DHA, since the endogenous production of these important compounds from the precursors can be reduced in the first months of life, chiefly in the very low-birthweight infants.

Quality of diet, body position, and time after feeding influence behavioral states in low birth weight infants

The effects of variations in carbohydrate and fat intake and body position on behavioral activity states were evaluated in 64 healthy, growing low birth weight infants (birth weight, 750-1600 g). The infants, enrolled in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study of effects of quality of dietary energy, were fed one of the five formulas. These formulas contained fixed intakes of protein (4 g/kg per day) but different intakes of carbohydrate (9.1 to 20.4 g/kg per day) and fat (4.3 to 9.5 g/kg per day). Six-hour daytime sleep studies were performed at 2-wk intervals from time of full enteral intake until discharge (mean postconceptional age at first study, 33.2 +/- 1.8 wk). Infants were randomly assigned to the prone or supine position for the first 3-h postprandial period; the position was reversed during the second 3 h. Behavioral activity state, i.e. quiet sleep (QS), active sleep, indeterminate sleep, awake, or crying was coded each minute throughout the postprandial period. The overall incidence of QS was almost double in the prone position versus the supine (p < 0.0001). In contrast, the probability of being in either of the two wakeful states (awake and crying) was increased when infants were placed in supine position (p < 0.0001). Increased likelihood of being in QS while prone was found only during the 30 min after and before feeding in a 150-min prandial cycle. In contrast, increased amounts of awake and crying in supine position were observed throughout the feeding interval. As carbohydrate intake increased, time spent in QS in supine position increased (from 8.6% to 12.5%, p < 0.02), and a trend in the same direction was noted for the prone position (p = 0.06). However, during postprandial minutes 10-100, when QS is likely to be entrained by the nutrient intake, enhancement of QS was found in the prone position only (p < 0.02). Carbohydrate intake influences the total time spent and the distribution of behavioral activity states within the postprandial period in low birth weight infants. The effect of nutrient intake on sleep profile is dependent on body position and time after feed. Mechanistic hypotheses relating sudden infant death syndrome to sleeping position may need to take these observations into account.

Nutritional support of the critically ill child

The pediatric metabolic response to injury and operation is proportional to the degree of stress and causes an increase in the turnover of proteins, fats, and carbohydrates. Thereby, substrates are made readily available for the immune response and wound healing. Because this process requires energy, the resting energy expenditure of ill patients increases. Whole-body protein degradation rates are elevated out of proportion to synthetic rates, and negative protein balance also ensues. Neonates and children are particularly susceptible to the loss of lean body mass and its attendant increased morbidity and mortality caused by an intrinsic lack of endogenous stores and greater baseline requirements. An appropriately designed mixed fuel system of nutritional support replete in protein does not quell this metabolic response but can result in anabolism and continued growth in ill children. In addition, the use of adequate analgesia and anesthesia is a readily available and proven means of reducing the magnitude of the catabolism associated with operation and injury. Finally, as hormonal- and cytokine-mediated metabolic alterations are better understood, therapeutic interventions may become available to directly modulate the metabolic response to illness, thus potentially further improving clinical outcome in pediatric surgical patients.

Metabolic effects of infection and postnatal steroids

Optimal development of the newborn depends on rapid accretion of substrate in the neonatal period, particularly in the premature infant. Steroids and infection not only induce catabolism, but associated endogenous responses reprioritize crucial substrate to restore homeostasis. The result is a protein/energy deficit and concomitant delay in growth and development. Innovative feeding strategies and novel therapies are needed to reduce the impact of catabolism in this population.

Protein and energy requirements in preterm infants

Although protein and energy requirements in healthy growing and enterally fed infants are relatively well established, the nutritional requirements of extremely low birth weight infants are considerably less certain. New and emerging data in ELBW infants suggest high rates of energy expenditure and protein losses, which results in significant nutritional deficits and high rates of growth failure. Based on the limited and incomplete available data, energy intakes of 125-130 kcal/kg/d and protein intakes of 3.5-4 g/kg/d appear to be necessary to produce normal growth in ELBW infants. Although these intakes may be difficult to achieve in clinical practice, there is clear evidence that aggressive early nutrition can improve growth outcomes in these infants.

Effects of quality of energy intake on growth and metabolic response of enterally fed low-birth-weight infants

Carbohydrate and fat may vary in their ability to support protein accretion and growth. If so, variations in the source of nonprotein energy might be used to therapeutic advantage in enterally fed low-birth-weight infants. To test the hypothesis that high-carbohydrate diets are more effective than isocaloric high-fat diets in promoting growth and protein accretion, low-birth-weight infants weighing 750-1600 g at birth were randomized in a double blind study to receive one of five formulas differing only in the quantity and quality of nonprotein energy. Groups 1, 2, and control received 130 kcal x kg(-1) x d(-1) with 35, 65, and 50% of the nonprotein energy as carbohydrate. Groups 3 and 4 received energy intake of 155 kcal x kg(-1) x d(-1) with 35 and 65% of the nonprotein energy as carbohydrate. Protein intake of all groups was 4 g x kg(-1) x d(-1). Growth and metabolic responses were followed weekly, and macronutrient balances including 6-h indirect calorimetry were performed biweekly. Greater rates of weight gain and nitrogen retention were observed at high-carbohydrate intake compared with high-fat intake at both gross energy intakes. Greater rates of energy storage and an increase in skinfold thickness were observed in group 4 (high-energy high-carbohydrate diet) despite higher rates of energy expenditure. These data support the hypothesis that at isocaloric intakes, carbohydrate is more effective than fat in enhancing growth and protein accretion in enterally fed low-birth-weight infants. However, a diet with high-energy and high-carbohydrate content also results in increased fat deposition.

Effects of quality of energy on substrate oxidation in enterally fed, low-birth-weight infants

BACKGROUND

Carbohydrate and fat may differ in their ability to support energy-requiring physiologic processes, such as protein synthesis and growth. If so, varying the constituents of infant formula might be therapeutically advantageous.

OBJECTIVE

We tested the hypothesis that low-birth-weight infants fed a diet containing 65% of nonprotein energy as carbohydrate oxidize relatively more carbohydrate and relatively less protein than do infants fed an isoenergetic, isonitrogenous diet containing 35% of nonprotein energy as carbohydrate.

DESIGN

Sixty-two low-birth-weight infants weighing from 750 to 1600 g at birth were assigned randomly and blindly to receive 1 of 5 formulas that differed only in the quantity and quality of nonprotein energy. Formula containing 544 kJ x kg(-1) x d(-1) with either 50%, 35%, or 65% of nonprotein energy as carbohydrate was administered to control subjects, group 1, and group 2, respectively. Groups 3 and 4 received gross energy intakes of 648 kJ x kg(-1) x d(-1) with 35% and 65% of nonprotein energy as carbohydrate. Protein intake was targeted at 4 g x kg(-1) x d(-1). Substrate oxidation was estimated from biweekly, 6-h measurements of gas exchange and 24-h urinary nitrogen excretion.

RESULTS

Carbohydrate oxidation was positively (r = 0.71, P < 0.0001) and fat oxidation was negatively (r = -0.46, P < 0.001) correlated with carbohydrate intake. Protein oxidation was negatively correlated with carbohydrate oxidation (r = -0.42, P < 0.001). Fat oxidation was not correlated with protein oxidation. Protein oxidation was less in infants receiving 65% of nonprotein energy as carbohydrate than in groups receiving 35% nonprotein energy as carbohydrate.

CONCLUSION

These data support the hypothesis that energy supplied as carbohydrate is more effective than energy supplied as fat in sparing protein oxidation in enterally fed low-birth-weight infants.

Stability of respiratory quotient and growth outcomes of very low birth weight infants

Nutritional management of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants involves promoting growth at rates that mimic intrauterine rates. Nutritional intake at the recommended energy level to promote growth results in fat accretion at levels that exceed intrauterine rates for fat accretion. The respiratory quotient (RQ), the ratio of carbon dioxide produced to oxygen consumed during oxidation, provides a measure of the percentage of substrates used for energy. An RQ of greater than 0.9 indicates carbohydrate is used to meet energy needs, allowing the majority of fat intake to be stored as new tissue. The purpose of this study was to examine the stability of the RQ across time in relation to nutritional intake and growth in VLBW infants. Subjects were 9 enterally fed VLBW infants. Measurements to determine the RQ were obtained weekly for 3 weeks by indirect calorimetry. Nutritional intake and growth velocity were examined. There was no significant difference in the RQ across 3 weeks. The mean (+/- SD) RQs for each of the 3 weeks were 1.08 (+/- 0.04), 1.06 (+/- 0.05), and 1.06 (+/- 0.07), respectively. No significant differences were found across the 3 weeks for any of the macronutrient variables. Growth velocity for the period was 15.7 g/kg/day. By discharge from the NICU, 66% of the infants had weights less than the 10th percentile on an intrauterine growth reference. An RQ greater than 1.0 indicates VLBW infants are depositing excess fat. However, increased accretion rates of fat did not improve the growth outcomes of these VLBW infants.

Factors affecting the measurement of energy expenditure during energy balance studies in preterm infants

Our objective was to examine factors that affect the accuracy of energy expenditure measurements (EE), when using flow-through indirect calorimetry (IC), to determine the minimum length of time needed to measure 24- and 48-h EE and to compare cross-over and parallel designs as methods of investigation during energy balance collections (EB) in preterm infants. A baby doll manikin was used to determine equilibration times and to compare VCO(2) and VO(2) as measured by flow meter and indirect calorimetry under different study conditions, one of which simulated an EB. "Continuous" EE was measured to determine the minimum length of time needed to accurately reflect 24- and 48-h EE and to compare parallel and cross-over studies as methods of study design in a group of "normal" enterally fed preterm infants. The mean (+/-SD) errors between flow meter and indirect calorimetry determinations for VCO(2) and VO(2) were -1.9 +/- 2.5 and -1.8 +/- 4.3% under conditions that simulated an EB. Cumulative 6-h EE accurately predicted 24- and 48-h EE. Expressed in absolute terms (kcal/d), EE did not change on a day-to-day basis but did increase over the 2-wk study period. Expressed on body weight basis (kcal/kg/d), EE did not change on a day-to-day or week-to-week basis. The variance in EE due to biologic variability; i.e. the parallel design, was approximately 6 times greater than that due to age, weight, and weight gain; i.e. the cross-over design. Indirect calorimetry, therefore, accurately measures EE in conditions simulating an energy balance collection. Six-hour EE determinations are valid estimate of EE during a 48-h balance collection, while cross-over studies may be the preferred method of study design during short-term studies of EE in preterm infants.

Effects of early nutrition on free radical formation in VLBW infants with respiratory distress

OBJECTIVE

We studied the development of essential fatty acid deficiency (EFAD) and its effects together with those of vitamin E deficiency on the free radical formation of very low birth weight (VLBW) infants with respiratory distress.

METHODS

Infants were divided into three groups based on the way each was supplied with daily total energy intake: (1) by fat free parenteral nutrition only or by nutrition composed of (2) less than or (3) higher than 25% of total daily energy intake given in oral feeding. We measured plasma lipid parameters and autoxidative susceptibility (AOS) of red blood cells (RBCs).

RESULTS

Plasma concentrations of linoleic acid were low in all the groups. After at least 14 days of feeding, eicosatrienoic acid (EA) was not detected. One week after the introduction of oral feeding, the abnormal triene/tetraene ratio of the groups had decreased, but was not normalized. Vitamin E deficiency was associated with significantly increased AOS, but EFAD was not. The two factors together caused an increase of AOS, that was additive.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data confirm that EFAD increases AOS of RBCs in VLBW infants. We assume that prevention of EFAD in VLBW infants could decrease the prevalence of complications associated with free radical formation.

Short-term growth and substrate use in very-low-birth-weight infants fed formulas with different energy contents

BACKGROUND

Currently available preterm formulas with energy contents of 3350 kJ (800 kcal)/L promote weight and length gain at rates at or above intrauterine growth rates but disproportionately increase total body fat.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine whether fat accretion in formula-fed, very-low-birth-weight (VLBW) infants could be decreased and net protein gain maintained by reducing energy intakes from 502 kJ (80 kcal)*kg(-)(1)*d(-)(1) [normal-energy (NE) formula] to 419 kJ (100 kcal)*kg(-)(1)*d(-)(1) [low-energy (LE) formula] while providing similar protein intakes (3.3 g*kg(-)(1)*d(-)(1)).

DESIGN

The study was a randomized, controlled trial enrolling 20 appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) and 16 small-for-gestational-age (SGA) VLBW infants (mean birth weight: 1.1 kg; mean gestational age: 31 wk); energy expenditure and nutrient balance were measured at 4 wk of age and anthropometric measurements were made when infants weighed 2 kg.

RESULTS

The percentage of fat in newly formed tissue was significantly lower in AGA infants fed the LE formula (n = 9) than in those fed the NE formula (n = 10) (9% compared with 23%; analysis of variance, P = 0.001). Energy expenditure was higher in AGA infants fed the NE formula than in those fed the LE formula. Skinfold thickness was markedly lower in AGA infants fed the LE formula than in those fed the NE formula, resulting in a lower estimated percentage body fat (8.0 +/- 1.9% and 10.8 +/- 3.5%, respectively; P < 0.05). Three of 6 SGA infants fed the LE formula were excluded during the study because of poor weight gain.

CONCLUSIONS

Body composition can easily be altered by changing the energy intakes of formula-fed VLBW infants. Energy intakes in these infants should be >419 kJ (100 kcal)*kg(-)(1)*d(-)(1).

Energy expenditure in the extremely low-birth weight infant

Information about energy requirements of extremely low-birth weight infants is sparse, despite the rapidly improving survival rates of this population. Metabolizable energy intake can be estimated from energy balance studies and the percentage of caloric intake that is actually absorbed by these infants is approximately 87%. Data on energy expenditure in extremely premature infants is limited; however, energy expenditure has been shown to increase with postnatal age. Because both intake and expenditure are affected by multiple factors, there is significant variability in estimates of the energy requirements in extremely low-birth weight infants. At present, no valid recommendations can be made regarding optimal energy requirements for the extremely low-birth weight infant, except that their requirements probably exceed those of stable, growing very low-birth weight infants, currently estimated at 105 to 135 kcal.kg-1d-1.

The metabolic needs of critically ill children and neonates

The pediatric metabolic response to injury and operation is proportional to the degree of stress and causes an increase in the turnover of proteins, fats, and carbohydrates. Thereby, substrates are made readily available for the immune response and wound healing. Because this process requires energy, the resting energy expenditure of ill patients increases. Whole-body protein degradation rates are elevated out of proportion to synthetic rates, and negative protein balance also ensues. Neonates and children are particularly susceptible to the loss of lean body mass and its attendant increased morbidity and mortality caused by an intrinsic lack of endogenous stores and greater baseline requirements. An appropriately designed mixed fuel system of nutritional support replete in protein does not quell this metabolic response but can result in anabolism and continued growth in ill children. In addition, the use of adequate analgesia and anesthesia is a readily available and proven means of reducing the magnitude of the catabolism associated with operation and injury. Finally, as hormonal- and cytokine-mediated metabolic alterations are better understood, therapeutic interventions may become available to directly modulate the metabolic response to illness, thus potentially further improving clinical outcome in pediatric surgical patients.

Diet and infant behavior

We studied 142 preterm infants (mean gestation 31 weeks, mean birthweight 1364 g) fed prospectively varied protein and energy intakes. Infants were grouped as either slow or rapid growers based on rate of weight gain. Rapid growers had increased heart rates (166 vs 160 beats/min), respiratory rates (55.7 vs 53.9 bpm), energy expenditure (64.8 vs 61.6 kcal kg(-1) day(-1)), urinary C-peptide levels (1.59 vs 0.79 ng ml(-1)) and time in active sleep (78.0 vs 75.2%), and decreased spectral edge frequency in the electroencephalogram (2.96 vs 4.45 Hz) compared to slow growers. We conclude that preterm infants growing at varying rates manifest physiological and behavioral differences, and that these patterns may reflect altered autonomic balance.

Nutrient accretion in preterm infants fed formula with different protein:energy ratios

BACKGROUND

Although standard formulas for preterm infants promote intrauterine rates of weight gain, fat deposition in preterm infants fed these formulas has been reported to be considerably higher than that in the fetus. We hypothesized that a preterm infant formula with a higher protein:energy (P:E) ratio would promote accretion rates of fat, fat-free mass, and minerals closer to those of the fetus.

METHODS

As part of a larger study to determine whether accretion rates of fat and fat-free mass closer to those of the fetus can be achieved with a higher P:E ratio, we present a descriptive analysis of 72-h nutrient balance studies performed on a subset (n = 15/30) of the infants randomly assigned to be fed formula with a P:E ratio of either 3.2 g/100 kcal or 2.6 g/100 kcal.

RESULTS

Despite the higher intake and net absorption of nitrogen by infants fed the higher P:E formula, there was no statistically significant difference in net nitrogen retention between groups. There also were no statistically significant differences between groups in digestible energy, metabolizable energy, energy expenditure, or energy storage. Thus, partitioning of stored energy as protein and fat did not differ between groups. The retention of calcium, phosphorus, sodium, potassium, copper, and zinc also did not differ between groups, and nitrogen intake did not affect mineral retention.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, formula for preterm infants with a P:E ratio of 3.2 g/100 kcal vs. 2.6 g/100 kcal provided no apparent benefit in terms of the proportion of fat to lean tissue accretion as determined from nutrient balance data.

Energy expended by low birth weight infants in the deposition of protein and fat

One hundred twenty low birth weight infants were enterally fed diets containing fixed differences in protein and energy content. Serial, biweekly measurements were made of metabolizable energy intake, energy expenditure, nitrogen balance, and distribution of states of sleep, from the time the infants were receiving full enteral intakes (180 mL/kg.d) until weight reached 2200 g. Using multiple regression analysis of energy expenditure against protein stored, and metabolizable energy, the energy expended in the deposition of protein was calculated to be 5.5 kcal/g +/- 1.1 kcal/g (SE) and the energy cost of fat deposited was 1.6 kcal/g +/- 0.3 kcal/g (SE). Estimated maintenance energy expenditure of the nongrowing low birth weight infant was 42.3 +/- 3.2 kcal/kg/d. Variations in distribution of sleep state, an assessment of the activity state of the infant, did not explain additional variability in energy expenditure, after adjusting for protein and energy storage.

Diet and body composition of preterm infants

There have been few systematic studies of the effects of energy and protein intake on the body composition of preterm infants. Analysis of published studies suggests a roughly inverse relation between energy stored per gram of weight gain (a measure of the fatness of new tissues) and the ratio of protein to energy in the preterm infant's diet. At least within a certain range of energy and protein intakes, a higher protein diet promotes leaner body composition. Studies of the effects of varying the dietary ratio of carbohydrate to fat in preterm infants have shown reduced rates of carbon dioxide production with high-fat diets, fed by either the parenteral or enteral route. The little information available suggests no clear effect of varying the carbohydrate-to-fat ratio on body composition. The mineral content of the body can be influenced by diet. Insufficient intakes of calcium and phosphorus reduce the bone mineral content and thus the whole-body content of these minerals.

How appropriate are commercially available human milk fortifiers?

A preliminary investigation was made into the effectiveness of two breastmilk fortifiers on the Australian market (FM-85 [Nestlé, Vevey, Switzerland] and Enfamil Human Milk Fortifier [EHMF; Mead Johnson, Evansville, IN, USA]). Infants < 1800 g and < 34 weeks gestation at birth, who were receiving breast milk, were randomized to receive either of the fortifiers (n = 14 for FM-85, n = 10 for EHMF), until a weight of 2 kg was reached. Infants not receiving breast milk (n = 9) were fed a preterm formula (Prenan, Nestlé). The two fortifier groups were similar in most parameters examined: (i) weight gain (17.9 +/- 3.0 vs 17.4 +/- 3.5 g/kg per day); (ii) head circumference growth (1.02 +/- 0.28 vs 1.03 +/- 0.25 cm/week); (iii) arm muscle area growth (32.6 +/- 20.0 vs 33.5 +/- 13.7 mm2/week); (iv) arm fat area growth (14.0 +/- 8.7 mm2/week); (v) plasma calcium (2.52 +/- 0.08 vs 2.58 +/- 0.15 mmol/L); (vi) plasma phosphate (2.02 +/- 0.21 vs 2.13 +/- 0.32 mmol/L); (vii) plasma copper (5.28 +/- 2.83 vs 5.66 +/- 3.07 mumol/L); and (vii) plasma zinc (13.3 +/- 5.5 vs 15.8 +/- 9.2 mumol/L). The FM-85 group had a higher alkaline phosphatase level (355 +/- 110 vs 231 +/- 70 iu/L) than the EHMF group; however, no values were outside the normal range. The Prenan group had a higher rate of weight gain (23.6 +/- 3.3 g/kg per day) and higher arm fat area growth rate (25.2 +/- 7.6 mm2/week) than the fortifier groups while all other parameters were similar.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Practical aspects of achieving positive energy balance in low birth weight infants

For the low birth weight (LBW) infant, energy balance during the first several days of life usually is equated to absorption of sufficient energy to match energy expenditure. Most studies show that energy expenditure of nongrowing LBW infants is 45 to 55 kcal/kg/day. Hence, for energy equilibrium, energy intake minus energy losses (i.e., metabolizable energy intake) must be at least 50 kcal/kg/day. Intakes above this amount result in energy storage or positive energy balance, whereas lesser intakes necessitate mobilization of endogenous energy stores (negative energy balance). Some of the problems of achieving positive energy balance in LBW infants (e.g., feeding intolerance and fear of necrotizing enterocolitis) can be circumvented by use of parenterally delivered nutrients. On balance, virtually all LBW infants will tolerate parenteral amino acid, glucose, and lipid intakes, respectively, of 2, 5, and 1 gm/kg/day or an energy intake of about 40 kcal/kg/day. It usually is possible to increase energy intake of most infants by an additional 10 kcal/kg/day. Whether this is achieved with enterally delivered nutrients or additional parenteral glucose or lipid intake, including the necessary modifications to enhance tolerance (e.g., insulin, 20% vs 10% lipid emulsions, and lipid emulsions containing medium-chain fatty acids), must be decided for each infant based on his or her underlying condition, likelihood of tolerating either substrate, and the impact of intolerance on the underlying condition. The consequences of not providing an essential nutrient during the immediate postnatal period also must be considered. The fact that essential fatty acid deficiency develops more rapidly in infants receiving isocaloric (60 kcal/kg/day) parenteral intakes with versus without amino acids, the likelihood that brain growth continues despite negative energy balance, and the possibility that LBW infants may not be able to desaturate/elongate linoleic and linolenic acids to the more unsaturated, longer-chain fatty acids that are deposited in the developing brain suggest that these infants may require exogenous intakes of specific fatty acids.

Decrease in serum IgE associated with limited restriction in energy intake to treat toddler's diarrhea

Toddler's diarrhea may be an allergic disease and its recurrences can be avoided with education to "internal spontaneity" in feeding, i.e., by education to a limited and reproducible decrease in eating incentives at the onset of meals. Serum IgE was thus investigated in 16 experimental children in a random comparison with 16 controls, all aged 1 to 4 years, before and after seven months' dietary treatment. Compliance was measured with a seven-day written diary, while serum IgE was measured by PRIST, before and after dietary treatment. A 21% decrease in energy intake (p less than 0.05) and about five times increase in fruit and nonstarchy vegetable intake amount was seen in treated children. A decrease in serum IgE level of 13.9 +/- 43.5 U/ml was found in the "internal spontaneity" group, as opposed to an increase of 33.2 +/- 50.5 U/ml in the control one (p less than 0.01). The differences between examinations were significantly correlated to the increase in NSV acceptance in all children plotted together (r = .51, p less than 0.005). The overall NSV effect on the changes of the 2 muscle areas, 2 symptoms, and 2 percent growth, 15 nutritional, 5 immune and 3 hepatic indices was significant with MANOVA (p less than 0.01). The education to "internal spontaneity" may be a useful tool for prevention of overeating, diarrhea recurrences and IgE increase in the second/third year of life.

Catch-up growth, muscle and fat accretion, and body proportionality of infants one year after newborn intensive care

We studied catch-up growth, muscle and fat accretion, and body proportionality at 4 and 12 months of age corrected for prematurity in 30 very low birth weight (VLBW) (less than 1500 gm), 30 low birth weight (LBW) (1500 to 2499 gm) and 30 normal birth weight (greater than or equal to 2500 gm) infants who required newborn intensive care. At 4 and 12 months, the VLBW infants had significantly lower mean weight and length (p less than 0.01), but not lower occipitofrontal circumference percentiles, than the LBW and normal birth weight groups, and showed no catch-up weight or length growth between 4 and 12 months. All three groups had significant increases in mean upper mid-arm circumferences, mid-arm muscle circumferences, and arm muscle areas between 4 and 12 months. Mean mid-arm muscle circumferences and arm muscle areas were similar among the three groups at 4 months but became significantly stratified by birth weight groups by 12 months, with VLBW infants having the lowest mean value. In contrast, analysis of fat stores by triceps skin-fold thickness and arm fat area demonstrated no significant increases in any group between 4 and 12 months, except for arm fat area in the LBW group. The VLBW infants had significantly less fat than normal birth weight infants at 4 and 12 months. All three groups had proportional growth at both visits, as assessed by mid-arm circumference/head circumference ratio and weight-length percentile for age. The VLBW infants were significantly lighter for their length than normal birth weight infants. We conclude that VLBW infants have no first-year catch-up growth, remaining smaller than higher birth weight infants, although appropriately proportional. Somatic growth during the first year is due more to muscle than to fat accretion, especially in VLBW infants.

Growth, nutrient retention, and metabolic response in low birth weight infants fed varying intakes of protein and energy

Growth, nutrient retention, and metabolic response were determined in low birth weight (LBW) infants fed daily protein and energy intakes, respectively, of 2.8 gm/kg and 119 kcal/kg (group 1), 3.8 gm/kg and 120 kcal/kg (group 2), and 3.9 gm/kg and 142 kcal/kg (group 3). The mean rates of both weight gain and nitrogen retention in group 1 were somewhat greater than intrauterine rates; plasma concentrations of transthyretin and albumin also were acceptable. Thus the lower protein intake appeared to be adequate. On the other hand, the rates of weight gain and nitrogen retention in groups 2 and 3 were greater than those in group 1, supporting the efficacy of the higher protein intake with respect to growth. However, blood urea nitrogen and plasma amino acid concentrations also were higher in groups 2 and 3; both were higher in group 2 than in group 3, reflecting the positive effect of the higher energy intake on protein utilization. This observation, combined with data from an earlier study, indicates that protein intakes in excess of 3 gm/100 kcal will not be utilized completely. Energy expenditure in group 3 was greater than in group 1 but not group 2, raising the possibility that protein intakes not utilized completely contribute to diet-induced thermogenesis. The higher energy intake in group 3 vs group 2 did not affect rate of weight gain significantly, but energy storage in group 3, and hence fat accretion, was greater than that of other groups. In all groups the ratio of protein accretion to fat accretion reflected dietary proportions of protein and energy.