Ex vivo response to aspirin differs in stroke patients with single or recurrent events: a pilot study

Circadian Rhythm of Cardiovascular Disease: The Potential of Chronotherapy With Aspirin

Almost all the systems in our body adhere to a daily 24 h rhythm. The cardiovascular system is also affected by this 24 h rhythm. In the morning there is a change in various cardiovascular processes, including platelet aggregability. These changes may play a role in the relative excess of early morning cardiovascular events. The number of recurrent cardiovascular diseases (CVD) could, in theory, be reduced by responding to this 24 h rhythm with timed medication intake (chronotherapy), which also applies to aspirin. Multiple studies on chronotherapy with low-dose aspirin are promising, showing a decrease in early morning platelet activity with evening intake compared with morning intake. However, in order to further demonstrate its clinical impact, randomized trials with cardiovascular events as a primary outcome are needed. This review discusses the available evidence of the effects of circadian rhythm on CVD and the potential positive effect of chronotherapy with aspirin.

Aspirin Resistance

OBJECTIVE:

To review the literature addressing the problem of aspirin resistance in patients with vascular disease.

DATA SOURCES:

A MEDLINE search (1966–February 2002) was performed. Key search terms included aspirin, resistance, resistant, failure, tolerance, and nonresponder. English-language studies were identified as well as pertinent references from these articles.

DATA SYNTHESIS:

Aspirin resistance has been reported in patients with cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and peripheral vascular disease. Because of differences in the definition of resistance, variations in detection methods, and a lack of controlled trials, the true significance of the problem remains unknown. Multiple mechanisms for resistance have been proposed, including increased reactivity to platelet aggregating factors, genetic polymorphism, and alternate pathways for thromboxane synthesis. The studies to date have failed to demonstrate consistent relationships between aspirin's platelet-inhibiting effects, the impact of dosage escalation, and clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS:

For many patients, aspirin is an effective antithrombotic agent. However, patients taking aspirin may demonstrate highly variable responses to in vitro tests for platelet aggregation and may experience breakthrough thromboembolic events. Although this phenomenon has been termed aspirin resistance, the lack of a uniform definition or agreement on diagnostic criteria precludes definitive recommendations at this time. In addition, strategies are needed to identify patients at risk for aspirin resistance who might benefit from alternative or combined antiplatelet therapy.

The PFA-100® detects sub-optimal antiplatelet responses in patients on aspirin

Although it is suspected that some patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) could have a sub-optimal response to aspirin (SASAR), currently a fixed dose of ASA is long-term used in all individuals. This study was designed to determine SASAR and whether a SASAR is a predictor for recurrence of ischemic events in patients on low-dose ASA with a previous ACS. One hundred patients taking ASA 100 mg/day were assessed at 1 and 6 months after a first ACS. SASAR was initially defined as a failure of the ASA treatment to significantly prolong the closure time in the Platelet Function Analyzer (PFA-100). SASAR in these samples was reconfirmed by conventional aggregometry. TXB2 levels were determined in plasma. At one month 49 patients showed SASAR in the PFA-100; only 25 of them showed SASAR by conventional aggregometry. At six months, 39 of 81 patients showed SASAR by PFA-100, but conventional aggregometry detected SASAR in only 12 of the 39 patients. TXB2 levels were significantly higher in patients with SASAR. Five patients with SASAR, by both tests, died during follow-up (p = 0.013). The PFA-100 detected a high rate of SASAR in patients with ACS. This instrument could be used to screen for suboptimal response to the antiplatelet action of ASA. Whether persistence of SASAR could relate to a higher risk of recurrence and how adjusting the dose of ASA could reduce the rate of SASAR are issues that deserve further investigations.

Aspirin resistance: disparities and clinical implications

Abstract Aspirin is one of the most widely prescribed drugs for the prevention of thrombosis in patients with vascular disease. Yet, aspirin is unable to prevent thrombosis in all patients. The term "aspirin resistance" has been used to broadly define the failure of aspirin to prevent a thrombotic event. Whether this is directly related to aspirin itself through biochemical aspirin resistance or treatment failure, or if it is because of aspirin's inability to overcome the thrombogenic aspects of the disease process itself, has not been elucidated. This can have dramatic clinical implications for a variety of vascular disease subsets and is cause for concern, considering the high prevalence of aspirin use for both primary and secondary prevention. Disparities exist in the rates of aspirin resistance among certain patient populations, such as women, patients with diabetes mellitus, and those with heart failure, and across clinical conditions, such as cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. Clinical trial data from studies observing resistance have revealed that regardless of study size, dose of aspirin, control for drug interactions and adherence, or assay used to measure platelet function, aspirin resistance is associated with an increased risk for adverse events. Although the evidence is mounting, there has yet to be a consensus on the appropriate clinical response to aspirin resistance.

Antiplatelet drugs: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)

This article about currently available antiplatelet drugs is part of the Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). It describes the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of aspirin, reversible cyclooxygenase inhibitors, thienopyridines, and integrin alphaIIbbeta3 receptor antagonists. The relationships among dose, efficacy, and safety are thoroughly discussed, with a mechanistic overview of randomized clinical trials. The article does not provide specific management recommendations; however, it does highlight important practical aspects related to antiplatelet therapy, including the optimal dose of aspirin, the variable balance of benefits and hazards in different clinical settings, and the issue of interindividual variability in response to antiplatelet drugs.

Partial inhibition of platelet thromboxane A2 synthesis by aspirin is associated with myonecrosis in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction

Heterogeneity in response to aspirin (ASA) treatment, or "aspirin resistance," could be of importance in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Decreased effects of ASA in platelets could be due to partial inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase-1 (COX-1) or to COX-1-independent mechanisms. We evaluated the effect of ASA treatment in patients with STEMI for (1) platelet thromboxane A(2) (TXA(2)) synthesis, (2) platelet recruitment elicited by TXA(2)-dependent and -independent mechanisms, and (3) a possible association of these aspects of platelet reactivity with serum markers of myonecrosis. We studied 62 ASA-treated patients within 48 hours of onset of the acute event and 69 ASA-free and 10 ASA-treated controls. TXA(2) synthesis and platelet recruitment (fluid-phase proaggregate activity of cell-free releasate) were assessed after collagen stimulation (1 micro g/ml) of whole blood. Partial inhibition of TXA(2) by ASA was found in 21 patients (34%). This was associated with significant increases in troponin T, creatine kinase-MB mass, creatine kinase, and recruiting activity versus 41 patients with blocked TXA(2) production. This was independent of fibrinolysis, and platelet COX-2 expression was not augmented. TXA(2) blockade was achieved after subsequent daily treatments or platelet incubation with ASA in vitro, suggesting lower sensitivity of COX-1 to ASA. In addition, 28 patients (45%) had an abnormally increased recruiting activity despite TXA(2) blockade, which was also associated with increased myonecrosis. In conclusion, ASA resistance, elicited by TXA(2)-dependent and TXA(2)-independent mechanisms, was prevalent in patients with STEMI. This study describes, for the first time, the association of partial platelet TXA(2) inhibition with myonecrosis.

Aspirin resistance or variable response or both?

Numerous clinical trials have demonstrated that aspirin is effective in secondary prevention and in high-risk primary prevention of adverse cardiovascular events. However, a constellation of clinical and laboratory evidence exists that demonstrates diminished or absent response to aspirin in some patients. This has led to the concept of "aspirin resistance," which is a poorly defined, somewhat misleading term. The mechanism for aspirin resistance has not been fully established, but it is almost certainly due to a combination of clinical, biological, and genetic properties affecting platelet function. There are no criteria for distinguishing true resistance from treatment failure, and there is no consensus on whether the definition of aspirin resistance should be based on clinical outcomes, laboratory evidence, or both. Studies in large populations are needed to define antiplatelet resistance using consistent and reproducible assays and correlate the measurements with clinical outcomes. One such prospective randomized trial is completed, and 2 others are under way: the Clopidogrel for High Atherothrombotic Risk and Ischemic Stabilization, Management, and Avoidance (CHARISMA) trial compared clopidogrel and aspirin with placebo and aspirin for high-risk primary or secondary prevention, and the Aspirin Nonresponsiveness and Clopidogrel Endpoint Trial (ASCET) is evaluating whether switching to clopidogrel will be superior to continued aspirin therapy in improving clinical outcomes in aspirin-resistant patients with angiographically documented coronary artery disease. The Research Evaluation to Study Individuals Who Show Thromboxane or P2Y(12) Receptor Resistance (RESISTOR) trial is investigating whether modifying antiplatelet regimens could prevent myonecrosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with aspirin and clopidogrel resistance.

Sex Difference in the Antiplatelet Effect of Aspirin in Patients with Stroke

Background:

There is substantial interpatient variability in response to aspirin after an ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), as assessed by ex vivo effects of aspirin on platelet aggregation. The factors contributing to this variability are not well defined.

Objective:

To determine whether demographic, social, or clinical characteristics are associated with ex vivo response to aspirin in patients with a history of stroke or TIA.

Methods:

Eighty-one patients who were taking aspirin for secondary stroke prevention and underwent ex vivo platelet aggregation studies were identified. The medical records of eligible patients were reviewed by clinicians who specialize in the management of stroke patients. Characteristics were compared between 45 patients who had a complete response to aspirin and 36 patients who exhibited an incomplete (partial) response to aspirin based on the results of platelet aggregation testing.

Results:

The median (range) aspirin dose was similar in complete (325; 81–1950 mg/day) and partial (325; 81–1300 mg/day) responders. There was no association between aspirin response and age, race, body mass index, medical history, smoking status, or use of statin or hormone replacement therapy. However, sex was significantly associated with response to aspirin, with more women in the partial versus complete responder group (75% vs 49%; p = 0.02).

Conclusions:

Our data suggest that aspirin may be less effective at inhibiting platelet aggregation in women compared with men who have a history of ischemic stroke or TIA.

Dipyridamole Decreases Protease-Activated Receptor and Annexin-V Binding on Platelets of Poststroke Patients with Aspirin Nonresponsiveness

BACKGROUND

Although controversial, the phenomenon of aspirin resistance (AR) has been correlated in some small studies with poor clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. Even less is known regarding the role of AR in the post stroke population. The reason for and the underlying mechanism of AR is unknown. We hypothesized that excessive formation of thrombin on the platelet surface may contribute to this phenomenon and assessed how dipyridamole affects multiple platelet and thrombin generation biomarkers in AR patients after ischemic stroke.

METHODS

Whole blood samples from 20 post stroke AR patients were pretreated with dipyridamole, simulating the therapeutic range, and then incubated for 45 min at 37 degrees C. Platelet characteristics were assessed by aggregometry, cartridge-based analyzer, and receptor expression by flow cytometry. Markers of thrombin generation were measured in the autologous plasma by ELISA.

RESULTS

Pretreatment of blood with dipyridamole resulted in 22-26% diminished expression of intact PAR-1 receptor (p=0.021 and p=0.024) and 28-31% decrease of annexin V binding (p=0.031 and p=0.02) after incubation with 2 microg/ml and 4 microg/ml of dipyridamole, respectively. Platelet aggregation and thrombin generation markers were not affected in vitro by dipyridamole.

CONCLUSIONS

Dipyridamole may be capable of overcoming increased prothrombinase complex formation and be in part able to compensate for AR in patients with moderate carotid stenosis. This phenomenon may explain the clinical advantages of Aggrenox, known to reduce ischemic events in post stroke patients as proven in clinical trials, though an additional antithrombotic benefit beyond the platelet inhibition by aspirin alone.

Aspirin sensitivity of platelet aggregation in diabetes mellitus

Although aspirin is cardioprotective in high-risk populations, many with diabetes mellitus (DM) are unresponsive to these benefits. We questioned whether cardiovascular unresponsiveness might be demonstrated by lack of aspirin sensitivity to in vitro platelet functions especially in subjects with poorly controlled diabetes. Six women and 4 men (48+/-8 years [mean+/-S.D.]), selected for poor control (glycohemoglobin 11.9+/-2.2%) and 10 sex-age (+/-5 years) matched controls received 81 mg aspirin daily. There was a 2-week washout from aspirin and related drugs. After the aspirin dose on day-7, blood for platelet aggregation assays, and 24-h urine for 2,3 dinor thromboxane B2 (TxB2) and 2,3 dinor 6-keto (PGF1alpha) were obtained. Aspirin sensitivity was defined as inhibition (i.e., lower than expected) platelet aggregation after exposure to an agonist. Those with diabetes and controls were sensitive to aspirin inhibition of platelet aggregation induced by 1.6 mM arachidonic acid (9.5+/-3.9% versus 9.1+/-3.1%, normal range 40-100%) and by 0.83 microg/mL collagen (17.4+/-13.9% versus 13.2+/-9.3%, normal range 60-93%), respectively. Aspirin sensitivity to 2 microM ADP was present in five with diabetes and five controls. Urinary prostaglandin metabolites were suppressed below reference ranges, without differences between those with DM or controls for TxB2 (350+/-149 pg/mg versus 348+/-93 pg/mg creatinine) and PGF1alpha (255+/-104 pg/mg versus 222+/-88 pg/mg creatinine). In conclusion, in poorly controlled diabetes, there was no differential lack of aspirin sensitivity to platelet aggregation, or lack of aspirin suppression of urinary TxB2 or PGF1alpha, compared with controls on aspirin. Despite suppression of urinary prostaglandin metabolites, aspirin resistance was most apparent to ADP-mediated platelet aggregation. It is not known what level of inhibition of in vitro tests is necessary for the cardioprotective benefits of aspirin in diabetes mellitus. Thus, the lack of aspirin protection in diabetes may be due to undefined aspects of platelet function.

Assessment of the antiplatelet effects of low to medium dose aspirin in the early and late phases after ischaemic stroke and TIA

Vascular events commonly recur in stroke patients on aspirin, and may reflect incomplete inhibition of platelet function with aspirin therapy. The platelet function analyser (PFA-100) activates platelets by aspirating a blood sample at a moderately high shear rate through a capillary to a biologically active membrane with a central aperture. The membrane is coated with collagen, and either ADP (C-ADP) or epinephrine (C-EPI). The time taken for activated platelets to adhere, aggregate, and occlude the aperture is called the closure time. Previous studies have shown that aspirin prolongs the C-EPI closure time, without prolongation of the C-ADP closure time, in the majority of control subjects. We hypothesised that the PFA-100 would provide a sensitive assay for the detection of early and convalescent phase cerebrovascular disease (CVD) patients who had incomplete inhibition of platelet function with aspirin. We investigated potential cyclooxygenase-dependent and -independent mechanisms that might influence the responsiveness to aspirin using the PFA-100. Patients were studied during the early (< or = 4 weeks, n=57) and convalescent phases ((< or = 3 months, n=46) after ischaemic stroke or TIA. To investigate potential mechanisms that could contribute to aspirin responsiveness on the PFA-100, we measured von Willebrand factor antigen levels, and carried out platelet aggregometry experiments in platelet-rich plasma in response to sodium arachidonate (1 mM) and ADP (5 microM). Sixty percent of patients in the early phase and 43% of patients in the convalescent phase did not have prolonged C-EPI closure times on 75-300 mg of aspirin daily, and were defined as aspirin non-responders. Median C-ADP closure times were significantly shorter in aspirin non-responders than aspirin-responders in both the early and convalescent phases after symptom onset (P=0.008), suggesting platelet hyper-reactivity to collagen or ADP in the aspirin non-responder subgroup. There was a significant inverse relationship between plasma von Willebrand factor antigen levels and C-EPI closure times in both early and convalescent phase CVD patients (P=0.008). Mean von Willebrand factor antigen levels were significantly higher in aspirin non-responders than aspirin responsive patients in the early (P=0.001), but not convalescent phase (P=0.2) after stroke and TIA. None of the patients studied were defined as being aspirin-resistant using sodium arachidonate- or ADP-induced platelet aggregometry. A large proportion of ischaemic CVD patients have incomplete inhibition of platelet function with low to medium dose aspirin using the PFA-100. The results suggest that cyclooxygenase-independent mechanisms, including elevated von Willebrand factor antigen levels, play an important role in mediating aspirin non-responsiveness on the PFA-100.

Platelet-Active Drugs: The Relationships Among Dose, Effectiveness, and Side Effects

This article discusses platelet active drugs as part of the Seventh American College of Chest Physicians Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence-Based Guidelines. New data on antiplatelet agents include the following: (1) the role of aspirin in primary prevention has been the subject of recommendations based on the assessment of cardiovascular risk; (2) an increasing number of reports suggest a substantial interindividual variability in the response to antiplatelet agents, and various phenomena of "resistance" to the antiplatelet effects of aspirin and clopidogrel; (3) the benefit/risk profile of currently available glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonists is substantially uncertain for patients with acute coronary syndromes who are not routinely scheduled for early revascularization; (4) there is an expanding role for the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel in the long-term management of high-risk patients; and (5) the cardiovascular effects of selective and nonselective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors have been the subject of increasing attention.

Platelet abnormalities associated with cerebral perfusion defects in cocaine dependence

BACKGROUND

This study assessed whether reduced regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF; hypoperfusion) in cocaine-dependent (CD) patients is associated with platelet abnormalities and whether these platelet abnormalities predict improvement in hypoperfusion after 1 month of abstinence.

METHODS

We correlated platelet number and aggregation with rCBF hypoperfusion in 54 CD patients at baseline and after a month of abstinence while taking either 325 mg aspirin or placebo. We measured rCBF by (SPECT) with (Tc-HMPAO). Platelet aggregation to adenosine diphosphate was compared at baseline and after treatment.

RESULTS

At baseline the number of hypoperfused voxels positively correlated with higher platelet aggregation, and five brain regions (bilateral frontal, right insula, right cingulate, left temporal lobes) showed significantly more hypoperfusion in the high than low platelet aggregation group. After abstinence, hypoperfusion significantly improved regardless of treatment assignment, and greater platelet aggregation at baseline predicted greater improvement in hypoperfusion. After abstinence, only the cingulate continued to show more hypoperfusion in the high- than low-aggregation group.

CONCLUSIONS

Because platelet function was related to hypoperfusion primarily in the distribution of the middle cerebral artery, where CD patients most commonly have strokes, more potent antiplatelet agents than aspirin might be effective.

Failure of aspirin to prevent atherothrombosis: potential mechanisms and implications for clinical practice

Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) reduces the odds of serious atherothrombotic vascular events and death in a broad category of high risk patients by about one-quarter. The mechanism is believed to be inhibition of thromboxane biosynthesis by inactivation of platelet cyclo-oxygenase-1 enzyme. However, aspirin is not that effective; it still fails to prevent the majority of serious vascular events. Mechanisms that may account for the failure of aspirin to prevent vascular events include non-atherothrombotic causes of vascular disease, non-adherence to aspirin therapy, an inadequate dosage, alternative "upstream" pathways of platelet activation (e.g. via stimulation of the ADP, collagen or thrombin receptors on platelets), aspirin-insensitive thromboxane biosynthesis (e.g. via monocyte cyclo-oxygenase-2), or drugs that interfere with the antiplatelet effects of aspirin. Genetic or acquired factors may further modify the inhibitory effects of aspirin on platelets (e.g. polymorphisms involving platelet-associated proteins, increased platelet turnover states). Identification and treatment of the potential causes of aspirin failure could prevent at least another 20% of serious vascular events (i.e. over and above those that are currently prevented by aspirin). There is currently no role for routine laboratory testing to measure the antiplatelet effects of aspirin. Clinicians should ensure that patients at high risk of atherothrombosis (>3% risk over 5 years) are compliant with aspirin therapy and are taking the correct dosage (75-150 mg/day). Patients who cannot tolerate aspirin, are allergic to aspirin, or have experienced recurrent serious atherothrombotic events whilst taking aspirin, should be treated with clopidogrel, and patients with acute coronary syndromes benefit from the combination of clopidogrel plus aspirin. Future research is required to standardize and validate laboratory testing of the antiplatelet effects of aspirin and to identify treatments that can both improve these laboratory measures and reduce the risk of future atherothrombotic events.

Aspirin or amiloride for cerebral perfusion defects in cocaine dependence

Cocaine dependent (CD) patients have regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) deficits that may be related to occlusion of blood vessels by vasoconstriction and abnormal platelet aggregation. This study determined whether aspirin, which reverses platelet aggregation, or amiloride, a vasodilator, significantly reversed this rCBF hypoperfusion. This 1-month randomized trial compared clusters of voxels with significant hypoperfusion in recently abstinent CD patients after aspirin (325 mg daily), amiloride (10 mg daily) or placebo treatment. Forty-nine primary CD patients and 18 non-drug abusing controls were compared using single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) neuroimaging with 99mTc-hexamethyl-propyleneamine-oxime and statistical parametric mapping (SPM). Platelet aggregation to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) was examined after treatment to determine whether rCBF improvement was related to decreased platelet aggregation. Following treatment, areas of hypoperfusion were improved with amiloride, unchanged with aspirin, and worsened with placebo in comparison to baseline levels. Platelet aggregation after ADP showed no significant change during the month, but reduced rCBF significantly improved after 1-month treatment with amiloride compared with placebo and cocaine abstinence alone.

Effect of prior aspirin use on stroke severity in the trial of Org 10172 in acute stroke treatment (TOAST)

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Although the efficacy of aspirin in reducing stroke incidence is clear, its role in reducing stroke severity is disputed. This study compares stroke severity between patients who did or did not take aspirin in the week before stroke and enrollment in the Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST).

METHODS

Of 1275 patients randomized, 509 reported aspirin use in the week before stroke; 766 did not. Clinical stroke severity was assessed with the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and the Supplementary Motor Examination (SME) at trial entry and at 3 months. Using these scales, we compared the categorization of stroke severity (mild, moderate, and severe) and mean scores between aspirin users and nonusers.

RESULTS

The difference in distribution of baseline NIHSS scores was statistically significant between aspirin users and nonusers (P=0.006), with a greater percentage of milder strokes among aspirin users. The difference in mean baseline NIHSS scores was also significantly lower in aspirin users (8.2) and nonusers (9.3) (P=0.003). The distribution of baseline SME scores and mean SME scores also showed lower stroke severity in aspirin users than in nonusers (P=0.048 and P=0.004, respectively). At 3 months, differences in stroke severity measured by the SME but not the NIHSS remained statistically significant. Seven-day and 3-month mortality did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study aspirin use is associated with milder clinical deficits at stroke onset. These deficits may affect prognosis and influence response to treatment. Future clinical trials should ensure that prestroke aspirin use is comparable in study groups.