Endopyelotomy after failed pyeloplasty: the long-term results

Evaluation of the results of laser endopyelotomy with two different technique in ureteropelvic junction obstruction

INTRODUCTION

Failed pyeloplasty procedures are caused by large amounts of scarring, and peripelvic fibrosis. This finding has been associated with urinary extravasations to the operation, urosepsis or an excessive tissue reaction. The treatment options for secondary UPJO (Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction) are the same with the options for primary procedures: in cases of very poor renal function, various pyeloplasty forms (open and laparoscopic), and ureterocalicostomy or sometimes nephrectomy may be considered in severe renal function loss. Whereas, endoscopic treatment can be considered in elective cases.

STUDY DESIGN

A total of 46 young patients who underwent endopyelotomy due to secondary ureteropelvic obstruction between January 2013 and September 2018 were included in the study. Patients underwent semirigid URS (Ureterorenoscopy) guided laser endopyelotomy until July 2015, and the patients had flexible URS guided laser endopyelotomy since July 2015.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was found as 17.7 ± 4.2 and 16.9 ± 5.7 years in the SURSLE (Semirigid Ureterorenoscopy Laser Endopyelotomy), and FURSLE (Flexible Ureterorenoscopy Laser Endopyelotomy) groups, respectively. Success of the procedure was confirmed in 20 (83%) patients in the SURSLE group, and 19 (86%) patients in the FURSLE group who had no obstructive symptoms based on USG, GFR and excretion curves on the renogram ordered in the 24th month. Four (16%) patients in the SURSLE group, and 3 (14%) patients in the FURSLE group were accepted as failed, their treatments were arranged for additional surgical procedures, and these patients were taken under the follow-up protocol.

DISCUSSION

This is one of the first studies comparing endopyelotomy with semirigid URS and flexible URS in patients with ureteropelvic stenosis. Long-term results with a large series of patients are not known, and our approach can be considered only as an individual method. There are different treatment options in UPJO. The use of fluoroscopy has advantages in endourologic operations. Therefore, lower radiation exposure can be a rational approach for protecting a person. Similarly, providing necessary protection also for physicians and operating room personnel is essential. In our study, shorter fluoroscopy time with SURSLE provided an advantage over FURSLE in terms of radiation exposure.

CONCLUSION

Of semirigid and flexible URS techniques that have no superiority over each other in terms of success, preferring semi-rigid URS guided laser endopyelotomy with lower ionizing radiation used, is more rational.

Risk Factors and Management Options for the Adult Failed Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction Repair in the Era of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Approaches: A Comprehensive Literature Review

Guidelines for the management of pyeloplasty failure remain elusive given the rarity of this condition and the difficulty of integrating and analyzing reported outcomes given the varying definition of failures. In this article, we aim to review the existing literature on risk factors that may influence the surgical outcomes of reconstructive pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Furthermore, we discuss management options and review success outcomes of treatment options for patients with pyeloplasty failure.

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus open pyeloplasty for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in children is an operative challenge. Minimally invasive endourological treatment options for secondary UPJO have suboptimal success rates; hence, there is a re-emergence of interest about redo pyeloplasty. The present study presented experience with laparoscopic management of previously failed pyeloplasty compared with open redo pyeloplasty in children.

STUDY DESIGN

Twenty-four children with recurrent UPJO who underwent transperitoneal dismembered laparoscopic pyeloplasty were studied. Operative, postoperative, and follow-up functional details were recorded and compared with those of open pyeloplasty (n = 15) carried out for recurrent UPJO by the same surgeon during the same study period.

RESULTS

Demographic data were comparable in the laparoscopic and open groups, except for a significantly lower GFR in the open group (24.8 vs 38.2 ml/min, P = 0.0001). Mean time to failure of the original repair was 20.2 months (23.6 months for redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty, 18.8 months for redo open). The success rate of laparoscopic redo pyeloplasty was 91.7 vs 100% in open redo pyeloplasty. Compared with redo open pyeloplasty, the mean operative time was longer (211.4 ± 32.2 vs 148.8 ± 16.6, P = 0.002), estimated blood loss was higher (102 vs 75 ml, P = 0.06), while hospital stay was shorter and pain score was lower in the laparoscopy group (P = 0.02) in the laparoscopic group. There were no intraoperative complications, while the postoperative complication rate was similar in the two groups (20.8 vs 20.0%).

DISCUSSION

Before the laparoscopic approach became a viable option, endopyelotomy was widely used for managing recurrent UPJO. However, the success rate of endopyelotomy for secondary UPJO was approximately 10-25% lower than for open pyeloplasty. Redo pyeloplasty had excellent results, with reported success rates of 77.8-100%. Laparoscopic redo pyeloplasty is becoming a viable alternative to open redo pyeloplasty in many centers with experience in minimally invasive techniques. The present study revealed that redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty appeared to have advantages over redo open surgery, in that it was associated with shorter hospital stay (4 vs 6 days, P = 0.046), reduced postoperative pain score (P = 0.02), and less need for postoperative analgesia (P = 0.001), still with comparable successful outcomes and patient safety. However, the procedure had a longer operative times and more blood loss.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty is a viable alternative to open pyeloplasty in children with recurrent UPJO, with shorter hospital stays and less postoperative pain. However, the procedure is technically demanding and should be attempted in high-volume centers by laparoscopists with considerable experience in laparoscopic reconstructive procedures.

Matched comparison of primary versus salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty

PURPOSE

To compare our experience with salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty, using a matched control set of primary laparoscopic pyeloplasty patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty from 1996 to 2014 by a single surgeon. At least 12 months of follow-up was required. Salvage patients were matched 1:3 with primary patients. Matching was based on age ±5 years, body mass index (BMI) ±5, and type of pyeloplasty (dismembered vs. non-dismembered). Primary outcome was failure as defined as re-intervention following laparoscopic pyeloplasty (does not include temporary stenting without definitive retreatment).

RESULTS

Of 128 laparoscopic pyeloplasty procedures, ten were salvage. These patients were matched to 26 patients who underwent a primary laparoscopic pyeloplasty in a 1:3 manner. One salvage pyeloplasty failed to match due to BMI, and the closest matches were made. Four salvage patients had one overlapping match, reducing the primary group to 26 patients. There were no differences in pre-, intra-, and postoperative variables between groups, except for operative time (salvage 247 min, primary 175 min, p = 0.03). With similar duration of radiologic and symptomatic follow-up, there was no significant difference in the rate of freedom from intervention.

CONCLUSION

When matching for factors that could affect success, salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty performed as well as primary pyeloplasty except for a longer operative time. In experienced hands, salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction recurrence after prior pyeloplasty is a safe and effective procedure, and should be considered an excellent alternative to the more commonly recommended endopyelotomy.

Definitive Management of Failure After Pyeloplasty

INTRODUCTION

Failure after pyeloplasty is difficult to manage. We report our experience managing pyeloplasty failures.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the case log of a single surgeon, from August 1996 to August 2014, to identify all patients undergoing a surgical procedure after failed pyeloplasty. We excluded patients without follow-up exceeding 1 year from initial postpyeloplasty procedure. Failure was defined as a need for additional definitive intervention.

RESULTS

Of 247 laparoscopic pyeloplasties, 68 endopyelotomies and 305 simple laparoscopic nephrectomies reviewed, 41 were performed after previous pyeloplasty and had sufficient follow-up. Laparoscopic nephrectomy was performed in nine patients. All three secondary laparoscopic pyeloplasties were successful. Of 29 secondary endopyelotomies, 10 (34%) were successful. Of the 19 failures after secondary endopyelotomy, 12 patients had tertiary pyeloplasty (5 laparoscopic and 7 open surgical), 5 (26%) underwent tertiary endopyelotomy, and 2 (11%) required nephrectomy. Our overall endopyelotomy success rate was 38% (13/34) vs 100% (11/11) for secondary or tertiary pyeloplasty (4 patients lost to follow-up). Median time to failure was 5 months for endopyelotomy. Median follow-up for patients free from intervention was 40.2 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Secondary pyeloplasty (including both laparoscopic and open surgical approach) is more than twice as successful as endopyelotomy after failed pyeloplasty. Secondary pyeloplasty is an excellent alternative to endopyelotomy in select patients with failure after initial pyeloplasty.

National Trends in Secondary Procedures Following Pediatric Pyeloplasty

PURPOSE

Although reported success rates after pediatric pyeloplasty to correct ureteropelvic junction are high, failure may require intervention. We sought to characterize the incidence and timing of secondary procedures after pediatric pyeloplasty using a national employer based insurance database.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Using the MarketScan® database we identified patients 0 to 18 years old who underwent pyeloplasty from 2007 to 2013 with greater than 3 months of postoperative enrollment. Secondary procedures following the index pyeloplasty were identified by CPT codes and classified as stent/drain, endoscopic, pyeloplasty, nephrectomy or transplant. The risk of undergoing a secondary procedure was ascertained using Cox proportional hazards models adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics.

RESULTS

We identified 1,976 patients with a mean ± SD followup of 23.9 ± 19.8 months. Overall 226 children (11.4%) had undergone at least 1 post-pyeloplasty procedure. The first procedure was done within 1 year in 87.2% of patients with a mean postoperative interval of 5.9 ± 11.1 months. Stents/drains, endoscopic procedures and pyeloplasties were noted in 116 (5.9%), 34 (1.7%) and 71 patients (3.1%), respectively. Length of stay was associated with undergoing a secondary procedure. Compared with 2 days or less the HR of 3 to 5 and 6 days or greater was 1.65 and 3.94 (p = 0.001 and <0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Following pediatric pyeloplasty 1 of 9 patients undergoes at least 1 secondary procedure with the majority performed within the first year. One of 11 patients undergoes intervention more extensive than placement of a single stent or drain, requiring management strategies that generally signify recurrent or persistent obstruction. Estimates of pyeloplasty success in this national data set are lower than in other published series.

[Salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the worst case scenario: after failed open repair and endoscopic salvage]

OBJECTIVES

We present the video of a laparoscopic correction of a left ureteropelvic junction obstruction in a patient who has already undergone previous surgical open pyeloplasty and subsequent acucise for failure of the first surgery. At 8 years after the second surgery, the patient showed a recurrence of the obstruction of the left ureteropelvic junction.
 It was decided to perform the retroperitoneal laparoscopic correction of the obstruction.


MATERIALS AND METHODS

With the patient placed in a 90° flank position, 4 trocars are placed in the retroperitoneum space by the Hasson tecnique.
 After the creation of the retroperitoneum space, the Gerota's fascia is opened. The posterior layer of the Gerota's fascia appears very thickened at the level of the lower pole of the kidney and is very adherent with the surrounding structures, in particular the psoas muscle.
 Gerota's fascia is incised and removed from the previous surgery and the psoas muscle is identified. The distal lumbar ureter is tenaciously anchored to the psoas muscle. The lower pole of the kidney is freed from the adhesions of the previous surgery. The proximal ureter is hardly isolable for the presence of fibrosis. The renal pelvis is fixed to the psoas due to fibrotic tissue that is cut with scissors. Once the pelvis and the ureter are separated from the psoas, the surgery proceeds with the liberation of the pelvis from the adipose tissue and fibrosis that surround it. The pieloureteral obstruction is not easily identifiable. The renal pelvis is opened at the level of the ureteral junction, the ureter is spatulated on its medial side. The scar tissue is removed until well vascularized tissue is seen. The anastomosis between the ureter and pelvis is performed with 2 semicontinuous running sutures. Once the anterior plate of the anastomosis is completed a cystoscopic retrograde DJ ureteral stent insertion is performed. The procedure ends with the packaging of the posterior plate of the anastomosis with the second running suture.


RESULTS

The operation lasted 180 minutes. The postoperative course was uneventful, the drain was removed on the second day and the bladder catheter on the 4th. The patient was discharged on the 5th day and the DJ ureteral stent was removed on the 21st post-operative day. 


DISCUSSION

The laparoscopic reoperation in patients with previous open surgery interventions is definitely difficult. This kind of surgery has to be carried out after having gained considerable laparoscopy experience. Specifically, the reoperation of laparoscopic pyeloplasty after 2 previous intervention poses the following difficulties: the creation of appropriate space, dissection of the ureter and pelvis from the psoas muscle, appropriate mobilization of the lower pole of the kidney to get a "tension free" anastomosis, liberation of the pelvis and ureter from the tenaciously adherent fibrotic tissue, identification of the stenotic ureteropelvic junction.


CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty after failure of past interventions remains a difficult procedure that should only be performed after major laparoscopic experience. In experienced hands, redo laparoscopic pyeloplasty provides high success rates.

Efficacy of endopyelotomy in patients with secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Few studies have focused on secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) as a disease entity. This study was designed to elucidate the etiology of secondary UPJO and to assess the success rate of endopyelotomy in these cases.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent an endopyelotomy by a single surgeon from May 1997 to September 2009 was conducted. Secondary UPJO was defined anastomotic strictures after dismembered pyeloplasty or as de novo formation after renal surgery. Success of the procedure was defined as both radiographic and symptomatic resolution of obstruction.

RESULTS

Of 157 endopyelotomies performed, 41 patients were considered to have secondary UPJO. Of these 41, previous open or laparoscopic pyeloplasties had failed in 14. Twenty classified as iatrogenic from previous renal surgeries: 10 open, 8 percutaneous, and 2 ureteroscopic. Two cases of secondary UPJO were attributed to strictures that were secondary to impacted stones in the past. The remaining five patients were considered to have idiopathic secondary UPJO and had previous normal imaging studies demonstrating absence of hydronephrosis before development of UJPO. The surgical success rate was 83.5% (35/41) for endopyelotomy in these cases. Seventy-five percent (3/4) of endopyelotomies in children ≤5 years old failed.

CONCLUSIONS

With proper selection, endopyelotomy for secondary UPJO in the adult population was found to be successful and should be considered before more invasive therapy. Success in the pediatric population was poor in this limited evaluation.

Ureteroscopic holmium laser endopyelotomy for ureteropelvic junction stenosis after pyeloplasty

INTRODUCTION

Pyeloplasty is a standard and highly successful treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. However, stenosis is a late complication causing symptom recurrence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of holmium laser stenosis incision-"laser endopyelotomy"-to manage this.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifteen adult patients were referred for loin pain recurrence after pyeloplasty. Subsequent to ureteropelvic junction stenosis confirmation with intravenous urogram and dynamic isotope renogram investigations, the patients underwent ureteroscopic laser endopyelotomy. Eleven patients had stents in situ before endopyelotomy. Ureteric stents (7F) were placed for 6 weeks postprocedure when ureteroscopy was repeated and stents removed. All patients had repeat intravenous urogram and renograms at 3 months postprocedure.

RESULTS

Patients presented at a median of 3.2 years (range, 9 months to 8 years) after pyeloplasty (nine open dismembered, three Culp, and three laparoscopic). Three patients (all nonstented) required a second incision. All patients were discharged from hospital within 23 hours with no complications. Symptomatic improvement was documented in all of the patients, and improved drainage was recorded in the 3-month nuclear scans.

CONCLUSION

Laser endopyelotomy is an appropriate minimally invasive procedure for postpyeloplasty stenosis. Results are better in patients with ureteric stents in situ before the procedure.

Long-term follow-up for salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty after failed open pyeloplasty

OBJECTIVES

To report our long-term experience with salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty after a failed open procedure. Laparoscopic repair of a primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is associated with very high long-term success. However, there are limited data on patients who have failed previous open pyeloplasty. We have determined that salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty is an excellent option for these patients.

METHODS

We queried our laparoscopic pyeloplasty database of 367 patients from July 1994 to May 2007 for patients who had undergone prior open pyeloplasty. We analyzed demographic data, perioperative course, complications, and follow-up studies on identified subjects. We assessed clinical status by verbal pain scale and diagnostic studies. Radiologic follow-up consisted of diuretic renal scan, intravenous pyelography, or both.

RESULTS

We identified 9 patients (2.5%) who underwent salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty for persistent obstruction after open pyeloplasty. The mean age of our cohort was 30.5 years (range, 19-50 years). Mean operative time was 204 minutes (range, 80-264 minutes), estimated blood loss was 105 mL (range, 20-300 mL), and mean length of stay was 2.1 days (range, 2-3 days). No intraoperative or postoperative complications were reported. All patients reported relief of symptoms in the immediate postoperative period. At a median follow-up of 66 months (range, 12-119 months), 8 of 9 patients (89%) had clinical and radiologic resolution of UPJO with stable renal function, pain free status, and a patent ureteropelvic junction. The remaining patient failed laparoscopic repair within the first year with evidence of persistent obstruction, necessitating endopyelotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the use of salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty as an excellent option for patients who failed previous open pyeloplasty. This approach provides durable long-term outcomes.

Antegrade percutaneous endopyelotomy

Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is a well-known pathologic condition with several potential associated urologic complications. The treatment for UPJO has evolved dramatically during the past two decades with the advent of minimally invasive treatment options. This has resulted in shorter hospital stays, reduced postoperative pain, and quicker convalescence compared with the gold standard, open pyeloplasty. Antegrade (percutaneous) endopyelotomy is one of the many minimally invasive treatment options for this disorder. In this article, we review the technical aspects, outcomes, and current role of antegrade endopyelotomy in the treatment of UPJO.

Salvage Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in the Worst Case Scenario: After Both Failed Open Repair and Endoscopic Salvage

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Historically, open pyeloplasty has been the gold-standard treatment for primary ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction, with success rates >90%. Over the past decade, laparoscopic pyeloplasty has emerged as a highly successful alternative for primary UPJ and secondary obstruction. For patients failing open pyeloplasty, endoscopic procedures such as antegrade and retrograde endopyelotomy have been used as salvage therapies with success rates as high as 87.5%. Persistent obstruction after an initial open pyeloplasty and a subsequent unsuccessful salvage endoscopic procedure presents a difficult scenario, often necessitating complex and challenging repairs. We reviewed our experience with salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty as a reconstructive option for this difficult group of patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 2002 and April 2005, 66 laparoscopic pyeloplasties were performed. Four patients, who had persistent obstruction after both open pyeloplasty and subsequent salvage endoscopic procedures, were the subject of this analysis. Operative time, length of stay (LOS), pain score resolution, and physiologic success rates were evaluated. Success was defined as resolution of obstruction on physiologic testing (renal scan).

RESULTS

The mean operative time was 310 minutes and the mean LOS 1.2 days. Three patients experienced resolution of obstruction by nuclear scan. The remaining patient, who has persistent obstruction but stable function on nuclear scan and resolution of pain, has refused evaluation with Whitaker testing. All patients have experienced at least 50% reduction of pain. Utilizing our strict physiologic criteria for success, including a diuretic T(1/2) of <10 minutes, a success rate of 75% was obtained.

CONCLUSION

Our series of laparoscopic reconstructions of the UPJ in patients failing both an initial open pyeloplasty and subsequent salvage endoscopic procedures is the largest in the literature at present. As in open surgery, the ability to respond to intraoperative findings with techniques such as flap repair and renal mobilization are essential. Although time consuming, these repairs can be successful and maintain the advantages of laparoscopy.

Antegrade versus Retrograde Endopyelotomy for Pelvi-Ureteric Junction (PUJ) Obstruction

OBJECTIVES

To compare complication and success rates of antegrade and retrograde endopyelotomy performed over 10 years and to define possible risk factors associated with treatment failure.

METHODS

From 1994 to 2004, 61 patients underwent a total of 68 endoscopic treatments: 19 antegrade and 49 retrograde endopyelotomy procedures. Antegrade endopyelotomy was always performed using diathermy. In the first 18 procedures retrograde endopyelotomy was performed using diathermy. In the most recent 30 procedures the incision was made using holmium laser. Endoluminal ultrasound was used in 78% of retrograde endopyelotomy and in 5% of antegrade endopyelotomy.

RESULTS

The retrograde endopyelotomy patients demonstrated significantly lower complication rates (12.5% vs. 42%) and shorter hospital stay (1.5 vs. 7 days) than the antegrade endopyelotomy patients. The mean follow up of the patients who remained free from disease recurrence during the study period was 46 and 24 months for the antegrade and retrograde endopyelotomy group, respectively. The overall success rate (mean time to failure) of antegrade and retrograde endopyelotomy was 56% (31 months) and 70% (17 months), respectively. There was no statistically significant increase in the overall success rate of retrograde endopyelotomy using endoluminal ultrasound per se. Stratifying retrograde endopyelotomy by the type of energy used for the incision, the overall success rate (mean time to failure) was 80% (10 months) and 53% (21 months) for Holmium laser and diathermy, respectively (p = 0.0626).

CONCLUSIONS

The overall success of antegrade and retrograde endopyelotomy in this series appears to be largely a factor of lead-time bias and is similar enough to recommend retrograde endopyelotomy with holmium laser on the basis of its relative safety and shorter hospital stay.

Ureteroscopic Laser Endopyelotomy in Secondary UPJ Obstruction after Pyeloplasty Failure

OBJECTIVES

Secondary ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction after failure of open and laparoscopic repair may be challenging to resolve due to possible extensive fibrosis and the increased invasiveness of this procedure. Alternatively, ureteroscopic laser endopyelotomy may be a more acceptable procedure for patients and surgeons. We report our preliminary experience with ureteroscopic holmium laser endopyelotomy after open pyeloplasty failure and define the complications that arose and the results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed 6 retrograde endopyelotomies with a holmium laser for failed UPJ repairs following the Anderson-Hynes procedures. Patient follow-up was carried out every 3 months using sonography and renal scan, and again after 1 year using renal scan and urography.

RESULTS

Mean hospitalization was 2.1 days. Ureteroscopic laser endopyelotomy was successful in 4 cases (66.6%). In 2 patients, failure occurred at the third month of follow-up. Complications included 1 case of slight bleeding, which was resolved conservatively without the need for blood transfusion, and 2 cases of guidewire rupture.

CONCLUSIONS

Secondary UPJ obstruction is more challenging to resolve by open or laparoscopic approach. Retrograde endopyelotomy gives a valid alternative thanks to its success rate and its better acceptance by patients. We consider retrograde laser endopyelotomy the approach to choose when faced with secondary UPJ obstruction after open or laparoscopic failures.

Endopyelotomy in Childhood: Our Experience with 37 Patients

PURPOSE

To evaluate our experience and results with endopyelotomy in the pediatric population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1990 and 2002, we performed percutaneous antegrade endopyelotomy under general anesthesia in 37 children because of ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) stricture. The youngest patient was 4.5 years and the oldest 17 years at the time of the procedure (mean age 11.5 years). One patient had bilateral stenosis; the two sides were operated on separately. After insertion of a 4F ureteral catheter and filling the collecting system with colored contrast material, a middle calix was punctured under fluoroscopic control. The tunnel was dilated to 26F by telescopic metal dilators. After insertion of a 0.035-inch gidewire through the UPJ, all its layers were cut by a cold knife in the dorsolateral direction so that the periureteral fatty tissue could be seen. Finally, the ureteral wound was stented by a 6F to 12F transrenal drain or a double-J catheter, which was removed after 6 weeks.

RESULTS

Among the 37 patients, the procedure had to be repeated in 1 because the transrenal drain stenting the UPJ slid back to the renal pelvis. We had to perform open pyeloplasty or nephrectomy in two patients because of bleeding or failed procedure. The average postoperative hospital stay was 6 days. Comparison of the preoperative intravenous urograms with studies performed 1 year after endopyelotomy showed an overall success rate of 89%. All patients are without complaints at the moment.

CONCLUSIONS

In experienced hands, endopyelotomy is a safe and effective method for the treatment of UPJ stricture, not only in the adult, but also in the pediatric, population.

MANAGEMENT OF SECONDARY URETEROPELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION AFTER FAILED PRIMARY LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic pyeloplasty has been established as a minimally invasive alternative to open pyeloplasty. However, little is known about the treatment of patients in whom this technique fails. We present our experience with treating ureteropelvic junction obstruction after failed primary laparoscopic pyeloplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From August 1993 to September of 2003, 227 patients underwent laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Of these patients 10 (4.4%), including 6 females and 4 males 24 to 62 years old (mean age 42.1), underwent secondary treatment after laparoscopic pyeloplasty failed. The type of secondary intervention varied by anatomical factors, and patient and surgeon preference. Success was defined as symptomatic relief and improved radiographic imaging at latest followup.

RESULTS

Secondary interventions were repeat laparoscopic pyeloplasty in 1 patient, retrograde endoscopic balloon dilation in 2 and endopyelotomy in 7 (laser, cold knife and cutting balloon endopyelotomy in 3, 2, and 2, respectively). No postoperative complications were seen. Patients were followed for a mean of 25.5 months (range 3 to 96) after the second procedure. Seven of 10 secondary interventions (70%) were successful with no obstruction on followup imaging. Three of 10 interventions (30%) failed, namely 1 laparoscopic pyeloplasty, 1 endoscopic balloon dilation and 1 laser endopyelotomy. Failure of the second procedure occurred at a mean of 9.3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

When given the choice, most patients select endoscopic management after failed primary laparoscopic pyeloplasty due to its minimally invasive nature and low complication rate. Success rates are 70% with repeat intervention. Some patients require a third intervention.

Impact of hydronephrosis and renal function on treatment outcome: antegrade versus retrograde endopyelotomy

OBJECTIVES

To compare, in a single-surgeon, single-institution study, the efficacy of antegrade and retrograde endopyelotomy in terms of success rate and morbidity and to identify which risk factors affect treatment outcomes.

METHODS

The results were retrospectively reviewed for 88 patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction treated with endopyelotomy. Antegrade endopyelotomy was performed with a hook knife, scissors, or cutting balloon device. Retrograde endopyelotomy was performed with a cutting balloon device. Objective results were based on intravenous urogram and/or diuretic nuclear renal scan findings, and subjective results were based on direct patient query and questionnaire.

RESULTS

Ninety-three endopyelotomy procedures, 64 antegrade and 29 retrograde, were performed. The mean follow-up was 37.0 months (range 5 to 76). The overall success rates between antegrade and retrograde endopyelotomy (81.3% versus 75.9%) were not statistically different (P = 0.553). Patients with massive hydronephrosis and poor initial renal function were less likely to have successful endopyelotomy. Antegrade endopyelotomy, however, was more successful than retrograde endopyelotomy in patients with massive hydronephrosis (66.7% versus 20.0%; P = 0.046). The average operative time for antegrade and retrograde endopyelotomy was 93.9 and 32.7 minutes (P <0.001), respectively. The average length of hospital stay after antegrade and retrograde endopyelotomy was 3.20 and 0.14 nights (P <0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Both antegrade and retrograde endopyelotomy are effective treatments for ureteropelvic junction obstruction associated with minimal morbidity. Antegrade endopyelotomy appears to be more successful in patients with high-grade hydronephrosis. Retrograde endopyelotomy results in a shorter hospital stay, a shorter operative time, and less postoperative pain.

Assessment of stricture formation with the ureteral access sheath

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the long-term incidence of ureteral stricture formation in a series of patients in whom a new-generation ureteral access sheath was used. A new generation of ureteral access sheaths has been developed to facilitate ureteroscopic procedures. However, some have questioned their safety and whether the device might cause significant ureteral trauma.

METHODS

Between September 1999 and July 2001, 150 consecutive ureteroscopic procedures with adjunctive use of an access sheath were performed. A retrospective chart review to April 2002 was done. Of the 150 patients, 130 underwent ureteroscopy for ureteral stones. Patients who underwent endoureterotomy or treatment of transitional cell carcinoma were excluded from this analysis. Sixty-two patients had follow-up greater than 3 months and were included in the analysis. Overall, 71 ureteroscopic procedures were performed, with 9 patients undergoing multiple procedures. Ninety-two percent of the patients had pathologic findings above the iliac vessels. The average patient age was 45.3 years (range 17 to 76), and 70% and 30% of the patients were male and female, respectively. The mean clinical follow-up was 332 days (range 95 to 821), and follow-up imaging was performed within 3 months after ureteroscopy in all patients.

RESULTS

The 10/12F access sheath was used in 8 ureteroscopic procedures (11.2%), the 12/14F access sheath in 56 (78.9%), and the 14/16F access sheath in 7 (9.8%). One stricture was identified on follow-up imaging of 71 procedures performed, for an incidence of 1.4%. The patient developed the stricture at the ureteropelvic junction after multiple ureteroscopic procedures to manage recurrent struvite calculi. The access sheath did not appear to be a contributing factor.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of our series indicate that the ureteral access sheath is safe and beneficial for routine use to facilitate flexible ureteroscopy. However, awareness of the potential ischemic effects with the use of unnecessarily large sheaths for long periods in patients at risk of ischemic injury should be considered. We advocate the routine use of the device for most flexible ureteroscopic procedures proximal to the iliac vessels.

Management of failed primary intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: 12-year, single-center experience

OBJECTIVES

To compare contemporary endourologic and open surgical management of failed primary intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction, specifically in regard to immediate and long-term results and complications.

METHODS

Since 1989, 48 patients have undergone management of failed primary intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Of these, 42 patients (21 females and 21 males; age range 16 to 68 years, mean age 34.9) underwent follow-up evaluations. These 42 patients constitute the present study group. The mode of secondary intervention was determined by individual upper tract anatomy, concurrent medical conditions, and informed patient preference. Secondary intervention included open operative repair (n = 20) or percutaneous (n = 11), ureteroscopic (n = 5), or retrograde cautery wire balloon (n = 6) endopyelotomy. Success was defined as symptomatic relief and improved calicectasis on radiographic evaluation at latest follow-up.

RESULTS

Follow-up ranged from 6 to 148 months (mean 47.7). Endourologic intervention was associated with a mean hospital stay of 2.3 nights and a complication rate of 13.6%. The long-term success rate of these endoscopic approaches was 59.1% overall, including a 71.4% success rate after a failed open operative procedure and a 37.5% success rate after a failed endourologic procedure. In contrast, open operative salvage was associated with a mean stay of 4.3 nights and a 15% complication rate. The success of open operative salvage was 95% overall, including 94.1% after failed endourologic intervention and 100% after failed open operative intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Endourologic intervention for failed primary management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction is associated with a short hospital stay and low rate of complications. Such intervention provides acceptable success rates in the setting of prior failed open operative intervention. However, when endourologic salvage was used for prior failed endourologic intervention, the success rates were limited. This suggests that intrinsic factors such as crossing vessels or periureteral fibrosis may play a role in limiting the utility of such procedures in this setting. In contrast, open operative salvage after any prior failed intervention for ureteropelvic junction obstruction provides excellent functional results without any increase in morbidity, with, in this contemporary series, an acceptably short hospital stay. These data should help urologists and patients make well-informed treatment decisions.

Role of acellular collagen matrix surgisis in the endoscopic management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction

PURPOSE

To investigate the role of acellular collagen matrix (Surgisis during endopyelotomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Nine female pigs (25-35 kg) were enrolled in our protocol. The pigs were categorized as follows. Group I (N = 3) had endopyelotomy + insertion of SIS, Group II (N = 3) creation of UPJ stricture + endopyelotomy + insertion of SIS, and Group III (N = 3) Davis intubated ureterotomy using SIS. The contralateral side served as a control for each group (one pig in each group). In three pigs (two in Group III and one in Group II), Surgisis was treated with India ink prior to insertion at the endopyelotomy site. An endopyelotomy stent (14/8 F x 24 cm) was used to stent the ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) for 4 weeks. Four weeks after the stent was removed, laparoscopic nephroureterectomy was performed, and the animals were euthanized. Histopathologic analysis of the Surgisis-regenerated segment of the UPJ was performed using hematoxylin and eosin, reticular (collagen), smooth muscle actin, and S-100 (nerve) stains.

RESULTS

All animals tolerated the procedure. The mean operative time was 162 minutes. One pig (Group II) developed pyonephrosis; one pig (Group III) developed significant ascites and was sacrificed 2 week before the end of the experiment. Histopathologic analysis showed complete epithelializaton at 8 weeks. Reticular stain demonstrated abundant collagen matrix in the submucosa. Smooth muscle staining revealed myofibroblastic proliferation within the SIS-regenerated tissue adjacent to disorganized smooth muscle cells. India ink-stained SIS-regenerated tissue did not show smooth muscle cells. The S-100 stain did not demonstrate neurons at 8 weeks; however, in three pigs, peristaltic activity was noted across the UPJ.

CONCLUSION

The use of acellular collagen matrix in the endoscopic management of UPJ obstruction is a promising technique. The abundance of myofibroblasts and absence of abundant smooth muscle regeneration indicates a need to investigate the role of growth factors in SIS regeneration of host tissue.

The role of endourology in ureteropelvic junction obstruction

Endopyelotomy has benefited from abundant confirmatory investigations, and significant progress in different technical modalities has occurred. Retrograde techniques, including the Acucise (Applied Medical, Laguna Hills, CA) cutting balloon and the ureteroscopic Holmium laser incision, are becoming preferred approaches while the other modalities retain their specific indications. Long-term results and potential complications have been carefully studied and reported. Better identification of risk factors has prompted precise preoperative investigations and allowed for careful patient selection, leading to improved results. These results approach those of open pyeloplasty, but with minimal morbidity.

Retroperitoneoscopic pyelotomy combined with the transposition of crossing vessels for ureteropelvic junction obstruction

PURPOSE

We developed a new approach of retroperitoneoscopic pyelotomy combined with the transposition of crossing vessels for ureteropelvic junction obstruction as an alternative to conventional antegrade or retrograde endopyelotomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From February 1997 to August 1999 we treated 5 cases of ureteropelvic junction obstruction due to crossing vessels that were diagnosed by helical computerized tomography. Ureterovascular hydronephrosis characterized by a malrotated renal pelvis with anterior crossing vessels was observed in 4 cases and ureteropelvic junction obstruction with a posterior crossing artery was present in 1. After endoureterotomy stent insertion under cystoscopic guidance we performed retroperitoneoscopic endopyelotomy with the kidney in standard position. Crossing vessels were transposed to a higher position to remove obstruction and fixed with peripelvic tissue via retroperitoneoscopy. In all cases a longitudinal incision approximately 1.5 cm. long was made with a potassium titanyl phosphate laser.

RESULTS

Convalescence was uneventful in all patients and the endoureterotomy stent was removed 4 to 8 weeks after surgery. Postoperatively helical computerized tomography showed the successful transposition of crossing vessels and significant hydronephrosis resolution in all cases. All patients were asymptomatic during followup of 17 to 28 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite our small number of patients our results are sufficient to conclude that retroperitoneoscopic pyelotomy combined with the transposition of crossing vessels is a simple and reliable method for treating ureterovascular hydronephrosis and associated conditions.

Percutaneous endopyelotomy

Percutaneous endopyelotomy, introduced over 15 years ago, is a well-established alternative to open operative pyeloplasty for management of ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) obstruction. Although several variations of the technique have been described, the goal in all cases is to develop a full thickness incision though the obstructing proximal uretra that extends out to the peripyeloureteral fat and heals over an internal stent. Though a percutaneous endopyelotomy can be considered for almost any patient with primary or secondary UPJ obstruction, it is particularly valuable in the setting of upper tract stones that can then be managed simultaneously. This article reviews the indications, techniques, and outcomes of percutaneous endopyelotomy.