Growth hormone (GH) response to GH-releasing peptide-6 and GH-releasing hormone in normal-weight and overweight patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus

Where are we now? Biased signalling of Class B G protein-coupled receptor-targeted therapeutics

Class B G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are a subfamily of 15 peptide hormone receptors with diverse roles in physiological functions and disease pathogenesis. Over the past decade, several novel therapeutics targeting these receptors have been approved for conditions like migraine, diabetes, and obesity, many of which are ground-breaking and first-in-class. Most of these therapeutics are agonist analogues with modified endogenous peptide sequences to enhance receptor activation or stability. Several small molecule and monoclonal antibody antagonists have also been approved or are in late-stage development. Differences in the sequence and structure of these therapeutic ligands lead to distinct signalling profiles, including biased behaviour or inhibition of specific pathways. Understanding this biased pharmacology offers unique development opportunities for improving therapeutic efficacy and reducing adverse effects. This review summarises current knowledge on the ligand bias of approved class B GPCR drugs, highlights strategies to refine and exploit their pharmacological profiles, and discusses key considerations related to receptor structure, localisation, and regulation for developing new therapies.

Predictive value of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor-1 axis for gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the role of growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor-1 risk factor axis in gestational diabetes mellitus, as well as to rank independently risk factors.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study conducted between April 2019 and April 2022. The baseline data and serum samples were collected and analyzed from 241 pregnant women during the second trimester. Logistic regression and restricted cubic spline analyses were conducted to assess the relationship between GH and IGF-1 correlated with risk of GDM. Back-propagation artificial neural network (BPNN) and Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were performed to identify the predictive ability of the GH/IGF-1 axis for GDM.

RESULTS

The present study found that the higher serum levels of IGF-1 and the lower serum levels of GH in pregnant women were significantly correlated with risk of GDM. GH and IGF-1 were different in both case and control groups(P < 0.05). BPNN analysis identified IGF-1 as accounting for the highest proportion in the ranking of GDM risk prediction weights (up to 25.4%). Furthermore, the area under ROC curve (AUC) value of the GH and IGF-1 combinations reached 0.770 (95%CI:0.707, 0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

GH (growth hormone) and IGF-1 (insulin-like growth factor 1) are intricately linked to the development of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). Disruptions in the GH/IGF-1 axis can trigger insulin resistance, thereby elevating the risk of GDM.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials: ChiCTR2000028811. Registration Date:20,200,104.

The Safety and Efficacy of Growth Hormone Secretagogues

INTRODUCTION

Growth hormone (GH) increases lean body mass, decreases fat mass, increases exercise tolerance and maximum oxygen uptake, enhances muscle strength, and improves linear growth. Long-term studies of GH administration offer conflicting results on its safety, which has led to strict Food and Drug Administration criteria for GH use. The potential drawbacks of exogenous GH use are believed to be due in part to impaired regulatory feedback.

AIM

To review the literature on GH secretagogues (GHSs), which include GH-releasing peptides and the orally available small-molecule drug ibutamoren mesylate.

METHODS

Review of clinical studies on the safety and efficacy of GHSs in human subjects.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Report on the physiologic changes from GHS use in human subjects including its safety profile.

RESULTS

GHSs promote pulsatile release of GH that is subject to negative feedback and can prevent supra-therapeutic levels of GH and their sequelae. To date, few long-term, rigorously controlled studies have examined the efficacy and safety of GHSs, although GHSs might improve growth velocity in children, stimulate appetite, improve lean mass in wasting states and in obese individuals, decrease bone turnover, increase fat-free mass, and improve sleep. Available studies indicate that GHSs are well tolerated, with some concern for increases in blood glucose because of decreases in insulin sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

Further work is needed to better understand the long-term impact of GHSs on human anatomy and physiology and more specifically in the context of a diversity of clinical scenarios. Furthermore, the safety of these compounds with long-term use, including evaluation of cancer incidence and mortality, is needed. Sigalos JT, Pastuszak AW. The Safety and Efficacy of Growth Hormone Secretagogues. Sex Med Rev 2018;6:45-53.

Influence of glucocorticoids and growth hormone on insulin sensitivity in humans

The seminal concept proposed by Sir Harold Himsworth more than 75 years ago that a large number of patients with diabetes were 'insulin insensitive', now termed insulin resistance, has now expanded to include several endocrine syndromes, namely those of glucocorticoid excess, and growth hormone excess and deficiency. Synthetic glucocorticoids are increasingly used to treat a wide variety of chronic diseases, whereas the beneficial effects of recombinant growth hormone replacement therapy in children and adults with growth hormone deficiency have now been well-recognized for over 25 years. However, clinical and experimental studies have established that increased circulating levels of glucocorticoids and growth hormone can also lead to worsening of insulin resistance, glucose intolerance, overt diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease. Improved understanding of the physiological 24-h rhythmicity of glucocorticoid and growth hormone secretion and its influence on the dawn phenomenon and the Staub-Trauggot effect has therefore led to renewed interest in studies on the mechanisms of insulin resistance induced by exogenous administration of glucocorticoids and growth hormone in humans. In this review, we describe the physiological events that result from the presence of resistance to insulin action at the level of skeletal muscle, adipose tissue, and liver, describe the known mechanisms of glucocorticoid- and growth hormone-mediated insulin resistance, and provide an update of the contributions of glucocorticoids and growth hormone to understanding the pathophysiology of insulin resistance and its effects on several endocrine syndromes.

Ghrelin and glucose homeostasis

Ghrelin plays an important physiological role in modulating GH secretion, insulin secretion and glucose metabolism. Ghrelin has direct effects on pancreatic islet function. Also, ghrelin is part of a mechanism that integrates the physiological response to fasting. However, pharmacologic studies indicate the important obesogenic/diabetogenic properties of ghrelin. This is very likely of physiological relevance, deriving from a requirement to protect against seasonal periods of food scarcity by building energy reserves, predominantly in the form of fat. Available data indicate the potential of ghrelin blockade as a means to prevent its diabetogenic effects. Several studies indicate a negative correlation between ghrelin levels and the incidence of type 2 diabetes and insulin resistance. However, it is unclear if low ghrelin levels are a risk factor or a compensatory response. Direct antagonism of the receptor does not always have the desired effects, however, since it can cause increased body weight gain. Pharmacological suppression of the ghrelin/des-acyl ghrelin ratio by treatment with des-acyl ghrelin may also be a viable alternative approach which appears to improve insulin sensitivity. A promising recently developed approach appears to be through the blockade of GOAT activity, although the longer term effects of this treatment remain to be investigated.

Chronobiology in the endocrine system

Biological signaling occurs in a complex web with participation and interaction of the central nervous system, the autonomous nervous system, the endocrine glands, peripheral endocrine tissues including the intestinal tract and adipose tissue, and the immune system. All of these show an intricate time structure with rhythms and pulsatile variations in multiple frequencies. Circadian (about 24-hour) and circannual (about 1-year) rhythms are kept in step with the cyclic environmental surrounding by the timing and length of the daily light span. Rhythmicity of many endocrine variables is essential for their efficacy and, even in some instances, for the qualitative nature of their effects. Indeed, the continuous administration of certain hormones and their synthetic analogues may show substantially different effects than expected. In the design of drug-delivery systems and treatment schedules involving directly or indirectly the endocrine system, consideration of the human time organization is essential. A large amount of information on the endocrine time structure has accumulated, some of which is discussed in this review.

The Dawn Phenomenon Revisited: Implications for Diabetes Therapy

OBJECTIVE

To summarize current data on the magnitude, prevalence, variability, pathogenesis, and management of the dawn phenomenon in patients with diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

On the basis of the pertinent available literature and clinical experience, we propose a quantitative definition of the dawn phenomenon, discuss potential pathogenic mechanisms, and suggest management options.

RESULTS

The "dawn phenomenon" is a term used to describe hyperglycemia or an increase in the amount of insulin needed to maintain normoglycemia, occurring in the absence of antecedent hypoglycemia or waning insulin levels, during the early morning hours. To be clinically relevant, the magnitude of the dawn increase in blood glucose level should be more than 10 mg/dL or the increase in insulin requirement should be at least 20% from the overnight nadir. Controversy exists regarding the frequency, reproducibility, and pathogenesis of the dawn phenomenon. Approximately 54% of patients with type 1 diabetes and 55% of patients with type 2 diabetes experience the dawn phenomenon when the foregoing quantitative definition is used. The most likely pathogenic mechanism underlying the dawn phenomenon is growth hormone-mediated impairment of insulin sensitivity at the liver and muscles. The exact biochemical pathways involved are unknown. Therapeutic decisions aimed at correcting fasting hyperglycemia should take into account the variability and magnitude of the dawn phenomenon within individual patients. Successful insulinization appears to minimize the effects of the dawn phenomenon. Currently, no subcutaneous depot preparation of insulin exists that is capable of mimicking the basal insulinsecretion of the healthy pancreas.

CONCLUSION

Increases in the bedtime doses of hypoglycemic agents with nighttime peaks in action may correct early morning hyperglycemia but be associated with undesirable nocturnal hypoglycemia. Targeted continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion programming can facilitate the prevention of early morning hyperglycemia in selected patients.

Evaluation of the reproducibility of the GHRH plus GHRP-6 test of growth hormone reserve in adults

BACKGROUND

The diagnosis of GH deficiency (GHD) is controversial, relying on GH secretion elicited by the provocative tests of GH reserve. However, the performance of most of the tests in use have not been evaluated rigorously. The repeatability of a test is a prerequisite before evaluating its diagnostic capability.

OBJECTIVE

The combined administration of GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) and GH-releasing hexapeptide (GHRP-6) is an efficacious test of GH reserve in adults, and the target of this work was to evaluate its reproducibility.

METHODS

Seventeen healthy subjects were challenged with GHRH plus GHRP-6 (1 micro g/kg i.v.). All subjects underwent four tests on different days separated by at least 2 months. GH peaks were evaluated by several mathematical analyses of reproducibility.

RESULTS

As a group, the subjects showed high reproducibility after the four tests, with GH peaks of 46.0 +/- 5.1; 48.4 +/- 6.4; 50.1 +/- 5.4 and 52.9 +/- 5.8 micro g/l, respectively (1 micro g/l = 3 mU/l). Individually analysed, the reproducibility was good, and the regression analysis showed a correlation between tests 1 and 2 of R = 0.729, P < 0.0009, between tests 1 and 3 of R = 0.710, P < 0.001, and between tests 1 and 4 of R = 0.683, P < 0.002. Under mathematical analysis, the multiple correlation coefficient analysis, analysis of variance (anova) with repeated measurements, repeatability index, the simplest coefficient of variation and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) all unambiguously showed that the GHRH + GHRP-6 test was reproducible. Furthermore, the repeated tests did not alter the biochemical diagnosis of the subjects, with absence of false-positive values.

CONCLUSIONS

The GHRH + GHRP-6 test of GH reserve is reproducible in adult subjects.

Growth hormone response to GHRH + GHRP-6 in type 2 diabetes during euglycemic and hyperglycemic clamp

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of two different glucose levels on GH response to the combined administration of GHRH+GHRP-6 in patients with type 2 diabetes. GH response to i.v. bolus of GHRH+GHRP-6 (100 mcg, each) was measured in 12 male patients with type 2 diabetes (mean age: 53.9+/-1.59 years; BMI: 25.58+/-0.39 kg/m(2); mean HbA(1c): 8.7+/-0.42%), during a euglycemic (mean glucose: 4.92+/-0.08 mmol) hyperinsulinemic clamp (insulin infusion rate of 100 mU/kg/h) and a hyperglycemic clamp (mean glucose: 12.19+/-0.11 mmol/l). There was no difference in basal GH levels between the hyperglycemic and euglycemic clamps (2.9+/-0.99 mU/l versus 1.48+/-0.44 mU/l; P>0.05). Peak GH response to GHRH+GHRP-6 during the hyperglycemic clamp was lower than in the englycemic clamp (112.45+/-14.45 mU/l versus 151.06+/-16.87 mU/l; P<0.05). Area under the GH curve was lower in the hyperglycemic than in the euglycemic clamp (6974.49+/-1001.95 mU/l/min versus 9560.75+/-1140.65 mU/l/min; P<0.05). It is concluded that hyperglycemia significantly reduces GH response to combined administration of GHRH+GHRP-6 in normal weight patients with type 2 diabetes. It is suggested that ambient glucose levels should be taken into account during interpretation of GH response to combined administration of GHRH+GHRP-6 in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Frequency of the dawn phenomenon in type 2 diabetes: implications for diabetes therapy

This study was designed to assess the frequency of the dawn phenomenon in patients with type 2 diabetes. A secondary aim was to examine the influence of varying treatment regimens on the frequency of the dawn phenomenon. The dawn phenomenon was defined as a rise in plasma glucose levels of > or = 0.5 mmol/L (10 mg/dL) between 0500 and 0900 h occurring after a growth hormone surge of > or = 5 microg/L. Sixteen subjects (six men, 10 women) with type 2 diabetes were studied overnight on their current mode of therapy in the General Clinical Research Center. Additionally, six of these subjects were restudied in random order after each of the following three therapeutic regimens: (1) 6 weeks of glipizide, (2) 6 weeks of bedtime NPH insulin, and (3) 3 days of intensive insulin therapy with multiple injections of regular insulin followed by assessment during overnight intravenous infusion of insulin. Thus, a total of 34 overnight studies were performed under various treatment conditions to provide an approximate frequency of the dawn phenomenon in type 2 diabetes. Blood was drawn every 30 min between midnight and 0800 h for measurement of glucose, insulin, C-peptide, and growth hormone levels. Additional counterregulatory hormone levels were determined during 24 of the studies, and the integrity of growth hormone secretion in response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia was assessed in 12 of the 16 patients. The subjects were aged 51 +/- 15 years with a body mass index of 31 +/- 5 kg/m(2) and a mean glycosylated hemoglobin of 8.1 +/- 1.2%. The dawn phenomenon occurred in only one of 34 (3%) studies. Moreover, the four different treatment regimens did not affect the frequency of occurrence of the dawn phenomenon. Ten of the 12 patients tested failed to secrete growth hormone in response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia. These data suggest that the dawn phenomenon is unusual in type 2 diabetes. Previously reported high prevalence rates in studies using similar sample size may be attributable to a Biostator-induced artifact. Decisions regarding therapies for type 2 diabetes should not be based on the assumption that the dawn phenomenon routinely causes early morning hyperglycemia.