Endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in renal transplant candidates

Pertinent issues in pretransplant recipient workup

Renal transplantation is recognized as the treatment of choice in most patients with end-stage renal disease. The evaluation of the candidate for kidney transplantation has been the recent subject of clinical practice guidelines published by the European Renal Association- European Dialysis Transplant Association and the American Society of Transplantation. The purpose of this article is to review the current literature for urological evaluation and treatment of patients prior to renal transplantation. In India, urologists are involved in evaluating not only the genitourinary problems but also vascular access and, vascular anatomy and pathology especially related to major pelvic vessels. Hence, evaluation of the transplant recipient should include assessment of vascular access for hemodialysis, access for peritoneal dialysis, assessment of pelvic vessels to which renal allograft vessels need to be anastomosed and genitourinary system. In addition, review of the serological tests for infective viral diseases like hepatitis and human immunodeficiency viruses should always be done before starting clinical evaluation. A note of the evaluation performed by other specialists like nephrologist, cardiologist, endocrinologist, pulmonologist, anesthetist etc. should always be reviewed.

Subureteral dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer injection for vesicoureteral reflux in transplant candidates

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Endoscopic subureteral injection of tissue-augmenting substances has become an alternative to antibiotic prophylaxis and open surgery for the management of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Several injectable materials have been tried for this purpose. In this study, we tried to determine the efficacy of dextranomer/hyaluronic acid copolymer (Dx/HA) injection for the treatment of VUR in renal-transplant candidates.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 21 transplant candidates (29 ureteral units; 13 females, 8 males) with a mean age of 20.2 years (range 14-26 years) underwent endoscopic correction of VUR with Dx/HA. Diagnosis of VUR was made by voiding cystourethrography. The efficacy of the treatment was assessed with voiding cystourethrography at 3 months and 1 year postoperatively. Renal transplantation with living related donor organs was performed in 11 of the 21 patients.

RESULTS

Endoscopic treatment was performed without complication in all cases. Higher success rates were obtained in patients with low-grade reflux, the overall success rate in the series being 82.7%. The mean follow- up after renal transplantation was 21.8 months (range 5-45 months). In one patient, reflux recurred after renal transplantation and was treated successfully by a repeat Dx/HA injection. The urine cultures of all patients remained sterile.

CONCLUSION

Transplant candidates with VUR can be treated with Dx/HA, which cured the majority of our patients after one or two treatments with few low side effects. Endoscopic subureteral injection of Dx/HA has become an alternative treatment for VUR in transplant candidates. Long-term results are needed before making a final statement about its value.

Use of collagen injections for vesicoureteral reflux in transplanted kidneys

Reports in the literature suggest the incidence of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) in transplanted kidneys to range from 2-79%. Collagen injections have been used with reported success rates of up to 65% to prevent VUR into native orifices in children, but have not been studied in transplant neo-orifices. We evaluated the use of collagen injections in seven patients with transplant kidney neo-orifices who displayed grades II-IV VUR and seemed to be related to symptomatic urinary tract infections (UTIs). Postoperative VCUGs obtained at 2 months showed improvement in the grade of reflux in four of seven (57.1%) patients; one (14.3%), no change; and two (28.6%), worse reflux. All patients also redeveloped symptomatic UTIs after collagen injection. We conclude that the use of collagen injections in kidney transplant neo-orifices did not prevent VUR. Although prevention of VUR may have been achieved short term, VCUG examinations 2 months after initial injection revealed persistent reflux. Etiologies for failure to prevent VUR may be the readily absorbable nature of collagen, technical aspects of the procedure, the degree of reflux, and anatomic differences between native orifices (which lie on a well-supported trigone) and transplant neo-orifices (which lie on the posterior wall with less support).