Retroperitoneoscopy-assisted living donor nephrectomy: 109 cases

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Live Kidney Donors: Techniques and Challenges

Live kidney donation is assuming an increasingly prominent role in kidney transplantation programs. The traditional operative approach has been through an incision in the upper quadrant of the abdomen or in the loin, with the attendant potential postoperative complications associated with a large surgical wound. These problems may act as disincentives to prospective donors. The introduction of laparoscopic donor surgery in 1995 heralded a new era offering reduced postoperative pain and improved cosmetic result. It is hoped that these benefits may counter some disincentives and thereby increase donation rates. Three minimal-access approaches and their advantages and disadvantages are described: classical laparoscopic, hand-assisted laparoscopic, and retroperitoneoscopic surgery. Published reports indicate extensive experience with the first 2 of these approaches and less experience with the latter. All 3 approaches present technical, physiological, and anatomical challenges in the context of retrieving an organ that is fit for transplantation. For minimal-access surgery to be accepted as the procedure of choice for live kidney donors, it must be demonstrated that morbidity is not transferred from donor to recipient when these techniques are used. Some concerns about these procedures are addressed. High-level evidence in the form of randomized controlled trials is generally lacking, but experiences of surgeons and patients suggest that, with appropriate modifications, these techniques are safe for both donors and allografts and also benefit donors' recovery.

[Comparative analysis of renal graft function after open vs. laparoscopic nephrectomy: experimental model]

INTRODUCTION

Living donor renal transplant reports a higher patient and graft survival in comparison to cadaver donor and represents a good alternative facing the current lack of organs for transplant.

GOALS

To analyze comparatively in an experimental model (pig) the influence of ischemia-reperfusion and functional outcome of renal graft retrieved by open Vs laparoscopic nephrectomy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

30 lab pigs were nephrectomized (left kidney): 15 by laparoscopy and 15 by open surgery, as living donors, in a model of renal autotransplant. Renal blood flow (RBF) was measured by means of an electromagnetic probe and creatinine levels during the first week after the implant.

RESULTS

Comparative analysis of RBF during the immediate 60 min after unclamping showed a significant reduction of average RBF in laparoscopic group in comparison to open group (p < 0.001), with a more evident reduction of RBF in the laparoscopic group during the 5-min period after unclamping (p < 0.001) and a progressive recuperation of RBF during the 1st hour, slowest in laparoscopic group. Creatinine levels in the first week after the transplant decreased progressively from 1.3 to 0.8 mgrs/dl in the open group and from 2 to 1.1 mg/dl in laparoscopic group (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Renal grafts retrieved by laparoscopy presents a more evident ischemia-reperfusion syndrome shown by a lower average RBF after unclamping and a significant deterioration of renal function during the first week after transplant.

Reluctance Over Right-Sided Retroperitoneoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy: Justified or Not?

We retrospectively compared perioperative donor outcomes and early complication rate of right- and left-sided retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy (RLDN).

METHODS

From November 2001 to April 2006, we performed 118 RLDN. Including 24% (n = 28) right-sided RLDN and 76% (n = 90) left-sided RLDN. Perioperative results and the rate of adverse events were compared for both sides.

RESULTS

We observed no significant difference in operation time, blood loss, warm ischemia time, or postoperative creatinine levels between right- and left-sided kidney donors. RLDN was successfully performed in 116 of 118 donors. One donor in each group had to be converted to an open approach. We observed one graft loss due to renal artery kinking in one recipient after left-sided RLDN. Two right donations needed a saphenous venous patch due to a short right renal vein (<2 cm). Overall, intraoperative and postoperative complications were comparable between the two donor groups.

CONCLUSION

Right-sided RLDN provides comparable perioperative and postoperative results to those of left-sided RLDN. Our results demonstrated that groups with significant experience in RLDN can perform right living donor nephrectomy safely and efficiently with minimal invasiveness.

Chyloretroperitoneum with secondary chylothorax after retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy

A 59-year-old woman complained of increasing pain in the left abdomen and of diarrheal symptoms after left-sided retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy. Computed tomography revealed chyloretroperitoneum. The fluid was drained percutaneously, followed by recurrent drain replacement surgery. Her diet was changed to short-chain and medium-chain fatty acids without success. After onset of dyspnea due to chylothorax, the donor underwent thoracic drainage, fully parenteral therapy, and finally somatostatin application therapy. The postoperative management of severe chylous fistula is difficult. Therefore, we recommend an early start of maximal conservative therapy. Surgical options depend on pain occurrence or mechanical problems.

Retroperitoneoscopic Living Donor Nephrectomy: A Retrospective Comparison to the Open Approach

A purely retroperitoneoscopic approach in living kidney donation is used by only a few centers worldwide. Data from 28 consecutive purely retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomies (RLDN) were compared to the most recent 30 open living donor nephrectomies (OLDN). Right-sided donation was performed in 12 cases (43%) of the RLDN and 11 cases (37%) of the OLDN. Comparison of the results between the two groups showed a shorter operation time and hospital stay for the RLDN group (P < 0.001). Warm ischemia time was significantly shorter in the OLDN group (P < 0.02). The rate of complications did not differ significantly between the groups. No significant difference in terms of renal graft function was detected within 30 days after surgery. As a result of the direct access, RLDN is superior in terms of operation time, even to the open access on our series, while maintaining the advantage of minimal invasiveness.

Favorable outcomes among recipients of living-donor nephrectomy using video-assisted minilaparotomy

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive, living-donor nephrectomy (LDN) is an attractive procedure for the donor in kidney transplantation (KTx). Its advantages include better cosmesis, shorter hospital stay, and rapid recovery. The most commonly performed, minimally invasive nephrectomy is done laparoscopically. However, the technical challenges, a steep learning curve for the surgeon, the risk of impaired early graft function, and the high cost of the procedure, have prevented minimally invasive LDN from gaining wide acceptance. To overcome these problems, we have developed a new surgical procedure named video-assisted minilaparotomy (VAM) for LDN. VAM-LDN is performed entirely with a small retrieval incision. Moreover, it does not require the induction of pneumoperitoneum, thereby avoiding potential vascular and renal complications.

METHODS

We evaluated the outcome of transplant recipients receiving kidneys with the VAM-LDN procedure by retrospectively comparing the surgical outcomes of patients who underwent KTx with the conventional open nephrectomy (group I, n=82) and VAM-LDN (group II, n=70) procedures from March 1, 1997, to June 30, 2002, at our institution. We compared postoperative complications, patient and graft survival, and graft functions between these two groups during a 12-month follow-up period.

RESULTS

There were no differences in demographic data, ABO compatibility, degree of human leukocyte antigen matching, or method of immunosuppression between the two groups (P >0.05). No significant difference was observed in complications such as delayed graft function, acute rejection, ureter complication, graft failure, or patient's mortality. There was no difference in graft function between the two groups, as determined by serum creatinine level measured during the 12-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The short-term recipient outcome was favorable in patients who underwent KTx with the VAM-LDN procedure.