Quality of life assessed by SF-36 health survey in renal transplant patients

Long-term quality of life and social outcome of childhood end-stage renal disease

OBJECTIVE

To assess quality of life (QoL) and social status after 30 years of renal-replacement therapy (RRT) and to explore determinants of this QoL.

STUDY DESIGN

The cohort comprised all Dutch patients, born before 1979, who started RRT at age<15 years in 1972-1992. All patients still alive in 2010 were asked to complete questionnaires on QoL (RAND-36) and sociodemographic outcomes. Scores were compared with those in the age-matched general population and with previous patient scores obtained in 2000. We performed logistic regression analysis for prediction of QoL outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 89 of 152 patients still alive in 2010 participated. Compared with the general population, QoL more often was impaired in patients receiving dialysis for most physical domains, in transplanted patients only on general health perception. Both transplanted and dialysis patients had normal or high scores on mental health. Scores in most physical domains were lower than in 2000. Patients were employed less often (61.8% vs 81.0%), had fewer offspring (31.5 vs 64.8%), and were less likely to have an income equal to or above average (34.8% vs 55.7%) compared with the general population. Disabilities, comorbidity, and unemployment were associated with impaired QoL.

CONCLUSIONS

After 30 years of RRT, adult survivors of pediatric end-stage renal disease have an impaired physical but a good mental QoL. The decrease of general health perception and physical functioning over time is worrying and may further hamper employment status and social functioning of these relatively young patients.

The effects of gender on health-related quality of life in pediatric live-donor kidney transplantation: a single-center experience in a developing country

To evaluate the effects of gender on HRQOL and overall health status in our pediatric kidney transplants. We performed a cross-sectional study in 77 children who received living renal allo-transplants in our center between 1981 and 2003. The patients were given a questionnaire at a post-transplant visit. After completing, the patients returned it in a closed envelope. The questionnaire included demographic questions plus 57 multiple-choice questions designed to analyze various aspects of post-transplant life. Overall, the patients show satisfactory HRQOL. Most of the patients lived with their parents (79.2%). The current health status did not cause difficulties at work in 70.1% and did not interfere with the social life in 62.3% of patients. Physical and sexual growth was delayed in 48% and 85.7% of patients, respectively. A total of 67.5% of patients had normal health life or minor symptoms with normal activity. There was no significant effect of gender on HRQOL except for onset of puberty, sexual function, practicing sports, and obesity. Overall, the patients show satisfactory HRQOL. There was mild significant effect of gender on HRQOL. These findings may help health care professionals to develop gender-specific interventions to optimize HRQOL of kidney transplants.

[Indications and long-term outcomes for solid organ transplant. Quality of life in solid organ transplant recipients]

Organ transplant constitutes one of the most encouraging advances in the history of the medicine. The organ transplants that were a distant challenge in the seventies currently are a routine procedure in the medical practice that has contributed to extending survival and quality of life in the general population. Spain has reached the highest rate for donation and transplants per one million inhabitants worldwide, this extraordinary health care work being a combined achievement of Spanish Health Care System. The objective of this article is to review the indications of solid organ transplants and their long-term outcomes, evaluating the impact on the health-related quality of life in solid organ transplant recipients.

Quality of life after kidney transplantation: the bright side of life?

This review describes the state-of-the-art on quality of life (QOL) in kidney transplant (KTx) recipients. More specifically, posttransplant QOL is compared with the pretransplant evaluation, with other chronically ill patient populations, and with healthy subjects. Determinants, consequences, and potential interventions to improve QOL are also summarized. However, because of the methodological diversity of published articles, this review starts with addressing some conceptual and methodological concerns surrounding research on QOL in general and in KTx recipients specifically. The ultimate goal of this review was to identify the gaps in the state-of-the-art evidence and to provide some guidelines for conduct of research in the future.

Quality of life assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey of patients on renal replacement therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) is the most widely used generic instrument to estimate quality of life of patients on renal replacement therapy. Purpose of this study was to summarize and compare the published literature on quality of life of hemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD), and renal transplant (RTx) patients.

METHODS

We used random-effects regression analyses to compare the SF-36 scores across treatment groups and adjusted this comparison for age and prevalence of diabetes using random-effects meta-regression analyses.

RESULTS

We found 52 articles that met the inclusion criteria, reporting quality of life of 36,582 patients. The unadjusted scores of all SF-36 health dimensions were not significantly different between HD and PD patients, but the scores of RTx patients were higher than those of dialysis patients, except for the dimensions Mental Health and Bodily Pain. Point differences between dialysis and RTx patients varied from 2 to 32. With adjustment for age and diabetes, the differences became smaller (point difference 2-22). The significance of the differences of both dialysis groups compared with RTx recipients disappeared for the dimensions Vitality and Social Functioning. The significance of the differences between HD and RTx patients disappeared on the dimensions Physical Functioning, Role Physical, and Bodily Pain.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that dialysis patients have a lower quality of life than RTx patients, but this difference can partly be explained by differences in age and prevalence of diabetes.

Influence of economic and demographic factors on quality of life in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to determine the influence of annual income, Medicare status, and demographic variables on the health-related quality of life (HQoL) of renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was mailed to 146 Georgia renal transplant recipients who had functional grafts. Data were collected using the SF-12 Health Survey (version 2), a demographics survey, and 2003 tax documents. One-way ANOVAs and Pearson's R correlations were used to examine relationships between annual income, Medicare status, demographic variables and SF-12 scores. Significant variables were included in stepwise multiple regression analyses.

RESULTS

Data from 130 participants (89% response rate) were collected. Recipients with no Medicare coverage had significantly higher scores on the Physical Functioning and Role Physical SF-12 scales (p = 0.005) compared to recipients with Medicare. Annual income was positively correlated with General Health (p < 0.05). Age and race were significant predictors of Vitality (p = 0.004) and Physical Component Summary (p < 0.001) scores. Age, race, and Medicare status were significant predictors of Physical Functioning and Role Physical scores (p < 0.001). Age, annual income, race, and years post-transplant were significant predictors of General Health score (p < 0.001). Age was the sole predictor of Bodily Pain score (p = 0.002), and marital status was the sole predictor of Social Functioning score (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Interventions designed to offset financial barriers may be needed to bolster renal transplant recipients' HQoL.

Comorbidities affect the impact of urinary incontinence as measured by disease-specific quality of life instruments

The aim of this study was to determine if the impact of urinary incontinence on activities of daily living, as measured by a disease-specific quality of life instrument, is dependent on comorbid conditions. Incontinent kidney transplant recipients participated in a survey to determine the impact of urinary incontinence on activities of daily living using the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire (IIQ-7). Similar information was collected from the charts of nontransplant incontinent women. Participants were matched for age, incontinence severity, pads per day, and leaks per day noted in a 3-day 24-h bladder diary. IIQ-7 scores from participants were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. Nontransplant incontinent women reported a 200% greater affect of incontinence on activities of daily living than incontinent renal transplant recipients (35.5+/-26.5 vs 12.9+/-15.4, p<0.0001) despite similarities in incontinence severity measures. Urinary incontinence has less of an impact on activities of daily living for renal transplant recipients than nontransplant incontinent women with similar incontinence severity measures because the disease-specific quality of life instrument used in this study was sensitive to their comorbid condition (transplant status).

The construct and concurrent validity of the EQ-5D in a renal transplant population

OBJECTIVES

Cost-utility analysis in renal transplant populations requires the use of a generic instrument for health status measurement that generates a single value for health. Such instruments should be widely applicable in diverse patient populations and their validity should be established. The aim of this study was to explore the validity of the EQ-5D in renal transplant patients.

METHODS

The EQ-5D was compared with the Short-Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36), the modified transplant symptom occurrence and symptom distress (MTSOSD) scale, the short-form Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and the State Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Construct and concurrent validity were tested on cross-sectional data of 350 patients.

RESULTS

Construct validity is good for some but not all EQ-5D dimensions, and the EQ-5D discriminates well among groups of patients with different health states according to the SF-36, MTSOSD scale, BDI, and STAI and between patients and the general public. Concurrent validity is good, as shown by the correspondence of EQ-5D and SF-36 results.

CONCLUSION

It is concluded that the EQ-5D is a valid instrument for the measurement of health status in renal transplant patients.