The value of brain natriuretic peptide for the diagnosis of heart transplant rejection

Diagnostic accuracy of brain natriuretic peptide and N-terminal-pro brain natriuretic peptide to detect complications of cardiac transplantation in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

We aimed to evaluate the utility of BNP and NT-proBNP in identifying adverse recipient outcomes following cardiac transplantation.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and the Cochrane Library from inception to February 2023. We included studies reporting associations between BNP or NT-proBNP and adverse outcomes following cardiac transplantation in adults. We calculated standardised mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI); or confusion matrices with sensitivities and specificities. Where meta-analysis was inappropriate, studies were analysed descriptively.

RESULTS

Thirty-two studies involving 2,297 cardiac transplantation recipients were included. We report no significant association between BNP or NT-proBNP and significant acute cellular rejection of grade 3A or higher (SMD 0.40, 95% CI -0.06-0.86) as defined by the latest 2004 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines. We also report no strong associations between BNP or NT-proBNP and cardiac allograft vasculopathy or antibody mediated rejection.

CONCLUSION

In isolation, serum BNP and NT-proBNP lack sufficient sensitivity and specificity to reliably predict adverse outcomes following cardiac transplantation.

Biomarkers of acute rejection following cardiac transplantation

Cardiac transplantation can be a life-saving treatment for selected patients with heart failure. However, despite advances in immunosuppressive therapy, acute allograft rejection remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality. The current 'gold standard' for rejection surveillance is endomyocardial biopsy, which aims to identify episodes of rejection prior to development of clinical manifestations. This is an invasive technique with a risk of false-positive and false-negative results. Consequently, a wide variety of noninvasive alternatives have been investigated for their potential role as biomarkers of rejection. This article reviews the evidence behind proposed alternatives such as imaging techniques, electrophysiological parameters and peripheral blood markers, and highlights the potential future role for biomarkers in cardiac transplantation as an adjunct to biopsy.

Brain natriuretic Peptide production and secretion in inflammation

Gene expression and secretion of the cardiac polypeptide hormones atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) are simultaneously upregulated in various cardiac disorders such as congestive heart failure, ischemic heart disease, and hypertensive heart disease, in which hemodynamic or neuroendocrine changes are key components in the progression of disease. However, during acute cardiac allograft rejection, plasma BNP levels are increased but not those of ANF. Successful treatment of the rejection episode decreases the elevated plasma BNP to prerejection values suggesting that substances related to inflammation may selectively influence BNP gene expression. Indeed, cytokines such as TNFα and IL-1β selectively stimulate cardiac BNP at the transcriptional and translational levels in cardiomyocyte cultures without affecting ANF. This selective BNP increase is seen in vivo, in addition to acute cardiac allograft rejection, in several circumstances where inflammation significantly contributes to the pathogenesis of disease such as in sepsis and in acute myocarditis.

Changes in serial B-type natriuretic peptide level independently predict cardiac allograft rejection

BACKGROUND

Despite positive associations with rejection, the clinical value of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) monitoring in heart transplant recipients has not been established. We sought to determine the predictive value of changes in serial BNP level for identifying patients with acute allograft rejection.

METHODS

BNP, hemodynamics and biopsies were obtained for 205 transplant recipients who underwent a total of 4,007 endomyocardial biopsy procedures. Samples analyzed were collected ≥ 180 days post-transplant, without evidence of rejection on the immediately preceding biopsy. Using a repeated-measures multivariate model, we assessed the association of change in BNP with Grade ≥ 3A (2R) rejection. We also determined predictive values of various cut-off thresholds of change in serial BNP levels to predict Grade ≥ 3A rejection.

RESULTS

There were 47 episodes of Grade ≥ 3A rejection among the 1,350 samples analyzed. Median change in serial BNP (ΔBNP) for those with Grade ≥ 3A rejection was 20 pg/ml (IQR -26 to 169 pg/ml) and among those with Grade <3A rejection was -4 pg/ml (IQR -34 to 22 pg/ml, p = 0.003). On multivariate analysis, ΔBNP remained the most potent independent predictor of Grade ≥ 3A rejection (p = 0.001). ΔBNP >100 pg/ml predicted increased risk of Grade ≥ 3A rejection (OR = 5.3, p < 0.001) with high specificity (93.3%) and positive predictive value (13.0%) and excellent negative predictive value (97.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Change in serial BNP level is an independent predictor of cardiac allograft rejection. With wide availability, rapid turnaround, low cost, favorable positive predictive value and excellent negative predictive value, serial BNP monitoring has several advantages for non-invasive monitoring of heart transplant recipients for acute cardiac allograft rejection.

Time-dependent changes in B-type natriuretic peptide after heart transplantation: correlation with allograft rejection and function

Endomyocardial biopsy is the gold standard to diagnose cardiac allograft rejection, although a noninvasive modality such as brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) is attractive. The authors examined the correlation of BNP levels with rejection patterns and allograft function in cardiac allograft recipients followed up to 8 years. One hundred forty-four consecutive patients underwent endomyocardial biopsy, right heart catheterization, and blood sampling. BNP levels decreased during the first 6 months after transplant but then reached a plateau. Time-dependent correlations were made between BNP levels and allograft rejection, left ventricular ejection fraction, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, right atrial pressure, and serum creatinine. BNP levels were not different between patients with any rejection pattern and no rejection prior to or after 6 months following transplant. BNP levels did not correlate with ejection fraction, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, right atrial pressure, or creatinine in the first 6 months after transplant. Statistically significant correlations existed between BNP and these parameters after 6 months following transplant. In cardiac transplant recipients, BNP levels decrease in the first 6 months following transplant and then reach a plateau regardless of the presence, type, or severity of allograft rejection. BNP levels do predict allograft rejection but correlate with allograft function after 6 months following transplant.

B-type natriuretic peptide is a sensitive screening test for acute rejection in pediatric heart transplant patients

BACKGROUND

The utility of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) for detecting acute rejection (AR) is unclear. The purpose of our study was to evaluate BNP as a screening test for AR in pediatric heart transplant patients.

METHODS

All endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs) with concurrent BNP levels from February 2004 through March 2007 at the study institution were reviewed and the association between BNP levels and acute rejection was assessed.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients underwent a total of 560 EMBs. The median age at EMB was 10.5 years (interquartile range [IQR] 3.7 to 15.4 years). There were 59 episodes of AR, 32 (54%) occurring at <1 year post-transplant. BNP levels were higher in patients with AR, median 387 pg/ml (IQR 125 to 931 pg/ml), compared with those without AR, median 66 pg/ml (IQR 37 to 148 pg/ml) (p < 0.001). The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for BNP demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.76 to 0.88) (p < 0.001). A BNP level of 100 pg/ml corresponded to a sensitivity of 0.85 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.92) and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.97 (95% CI 0.95 to 0.99) for detecting AR. The ROC curve for patients at >1 year post-transplant demonstrated an AUC of 0.86 (95% CI 0.80 to 0.93) (p < 0.001), and a BNP level of 100 pg/ml corresponded to a sensitivity of 0.96 (95% CI 0.79 to 0.99) and NPV of 0.994 (95% CI 0.962 to 0.999) for detecting AR.

CONCLUSIONS

BNP levels have a high sensitivity and NPV for evaluating AR in pediatric heart transplant patients. In patients >1 year post-transplant, a BNP level of <100 pg/ml correlates with a <1% chance of AR and may obviate the need for EMB in some cases.

Brain natriuretic peptide predicts serious cardiac allograft rejection independent of hemodynamic measurements

BACKGROUND

Serum brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) has been reported to be elevated in heart transplant recipients with both cellular and vascular rejection. Whether BNP can be used to help predict the severity of rejection is not well established.

METHODS

We analyzed serial BNP measurements obtained during endomyocardial biopsy procedures in consecutive heart transplant patients occurring >45 days after transplantation. To eliminate potential confounding from prior rejection episodes, we included only observations in which the previous biopsy grade was 0 or 1A. Multivariable linear regression was performed examining the outcome of increasing seriousness of rejection, defined as grade 0 < 1A < 2 < 1B < 3A < vascular rejection. A univariable logistic regression model was performed using log-transformed BNP as a predictor of vascular rejection.

RESULTS

There were 77 patients, with 161 separate observations. Median time between transplantation and first assessment was 6.0 months (interquartile range, 2.1, 31.6). Using multivariable linear regression, 3 factors were significantly associated with biopsy score: pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (p < 0.0001), BNP (p = 0.003), and heart rate (p = 0.01). Even after other significant univariable predictors (including pulmonary capillary wedge pressure) were forced into the model, BNP remained a significant predictor of biopsy score (p = 0.02). Log BNP was a significant univariable predictor of vascular rejection, with an odds ratio of 12.55 (per 1 unit increase, 95% confidence interval 3.43-45.84; p = 0.0001) and a model c-statistic of 0.91.

CONCLUSIONS

BNP predicts new episodes of serious cardiac allograft rejection, particularly vascular rejection, independent of hemodynamic measurements, and may be a useful part of rejection surveillance.

Value of NT-proBNP Determinations in the Follow-Up of Heart Transplantation

BACKGROUND

The N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) has been useful in the diagnosis and follow-up of heart failure. Whether it can be useful in the detection of acute rejection (AR) after heart transplantation (HT) has not been addressed. Our aim was to assess the prognostic value of NT-proBNP determinations after HT.

METHODS

We analyzed 137 endomyocardial biopsies (EMB) performed in 51 patients as assessment of AR and correlated them with NT-proBNP determinations. The value of NT-proBNP in the early follow-up of the novo HT was also assessed.

RESULTS

AR grade > or =3A was diagnosed in 10 of the 137 performed biopsies. There were no significant differences in NT-proBNP values between patients with or without AR (1047 +/- 629 versus 1886 +/- 3026 pg/mL, P = NS). There were 24 de novo HT, in these patients increased NT-proBNP levels showed an inverse significant correlation with time since HT (r = -0.40, P = .0001). During follow-up, 15 of the novo HT had a descending NT-proBNP curve over time, and in the remaining 9 (37%) a late increase of NT-proBNP values were observed. Those 9 patients had the following complications: AR > or =3A in 5 cases, 1 death, 2 required a permanent pacemaker, and in the last patient a significant EMB could not be obtained.

CONCLUSIONS

NT-proBNP values follow a descending curve early after HT. During the first months, a late increase of NT-proBNP value was associated with HT complications, with AR being the most frequent. Isolated increased NT-proBNP levels were not useful for the detection of AR. More studies are needed to establish the prognostic value of NT-proBNP after HT.

B-Type Natriuretic Peptide as a Marker of Allograft Rejection After Heart Transplantation

B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentrations, a cardiac hormone released upon cardiac stress, was monitored in patients after heart transplantation. Rejection was assessed by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) criteria. BNP was assessed by a cross-sectional approach. We found significantly (p = 0.024) increased concentrations during rejection episodes of ISHLT grade 2 and higher. BNP yielded only a moderate diagnostic accuracy (area under the receiving characteristic curve: mean = 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.53-0.92) to detect clinically significant episodes of rejection, which was too low to replace endomyocardial biopsies. Acute rejection episodes were associated with marked BNP increases and a significant decrease in case of successful treatment in the individual long-term monitoring in the majority of patients. BNP monitoring seems to be a useful addition in the individual follow-up of heart transplant recipients to rule out significant rejection.

Value of plasma B-type natriuretic peptide as a marker for rejection in pediatric heart transplant recipients

We analyzed 211 consecutive plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) measurements in 59 pediatric heart transplant patients along with echocardiographic and right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy samples. Patients with a biopsy specimen negative for rejection had significantly lower BNP levels than those patients with a biopsy positive (p </=0.04) for rejection. BNP significantly decreased with treatment (p </=0.007). BNP levels in the first year after heart transplantation in all patients were significantly greater than BNP levels after the first year in all patients (p <0.001).

Predictive value of brain natriuretic peptide in the diagnosis of heart transplant rejection

AIM

To evaluate the pattern of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) concentration in heart transplant (HT) recipients and its relation to the degree of graft rejection determined by endomyocardial biopsy specimen.

METHODS

We studied 71 consecutive HT recipients (62 men, 53 +/- 11 years). The patients underwent 383 biopsies. Creatinine and BNP concentrations and hemodynamic parameters were determined along with the degree of graft rejection using endomyocardial biopsy specimens. We considered treatable rejection as International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Grade >or=2 in the first 90 days and >or=3A thereafter. We included a control group of 36 healthy individuals.

RESULTS

Brain natriuretic peptide concentration was significantly greater among HT recipients (264 +/- 318 pg/ml) than in controls (17 +/- 16 pg/ml). In the first 90 days, BNP concentration was significantly greater among the patients with graft rejection (510 +/- 470, n = 84, vs 278 +/- 255, n = 87; p < 0.0001), although the corresponding discriminatory capacity was small. After the first 90 days, BNP values were similar in patients with and without graft rejection (170 +/- 297, n = 17, vs 142 +/- 203, n = 195; p = not significant). Creatinine concentration increased with time after transplantation and did not correlate with BNP concentration. We observed significant positive correlation between BNP concentration and hemodynamic parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Brain natriuretic peptide concentration remains increased after HT, with stabilization after the 4th month. Brain natriuretic peptide concentrations are slightly greater among patients with treatable rejection, particularly in the first 90 days, although BNP concentration lacks discriminatory capacity to serve as a guide to performing biopsy.

Ventricular natriuretic peptide (BNP) in heart transplantation: BNP correlation with endomyocardial biopsy, laboratory and hemodynamic measures

A prospective study of 81 heart transplant (HT) patients was carried out in order to evaluate the evolution of brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels in HT patients and compare them with the degree of rejection as determined by endomyocardial biopsy. All patients were subjected to endomyocardial biopsy (532), and determination of BNP and creatinine levels as well as hemodynamic parameters. A control group of 36 volunteers was included. BNP values were significantly greater in HT patients than in healthy volunteers. In the first 3 months, BNP levels in patients with treatable rejection were significantly greater than in patients without graft rejection, although evident overlapping was observed in both distributions and discriminatory potential was low. After the third month, BNP values were similar in patients with and without rejection. Creatinine levels were observed to increase over time after transplantation, but no correlation was observed between the creatinine and BNP levels. A significant positive correlation was observed between BNP and right ventricle and pulmonary arterial pressures.