Steroid weaning in heart transplantation is associated with decreased B-type natriuretic peptide: surrogate evidence for cardiac adaptation

Steroid withdrawal after heart transplantation in adults

Corticosteroids (CSs) are a key component of immunosuppressive treatment after heart transplantation (HTx). While effectively preventing acute rejection, several adverse effects including diabetes, hypertension, osteoporosis, and hyperlipidemia are associated with long-term use. As these complications may impair long-term outcome in HTx recipients, withdrawal of CSs is highly desirable, however, no uniform approach exists. Previous experience suggests that CS withdrawal can be accomplished without an increase in the incidence of acute rejection and even carrying a survival benefit. Also, common complications related to long-term CS use appear to be less frequent following CS discontinuation. Recipients who successfully discontinue CSs, however, likely belong to an immune-privileged subset of patients with low risk of post-transplant complications. Available studies evaluating CS withdrawal are highly heterogeneous and consensus on optimal timing and eligibility for withdrawal is lacking. Efforts to improve the understanding of optimal CS withdrawal strategy are of great importance in order to safely promote CS weaning in eligible patients and thereby alleviate the adverse effects of long-term CS use on post-transplant outcomes. The purpose of this review was to evaluate different protocols of CS withdrawal after HTx in terms of clinical outcomes and to explore criteria for successful CS withdrawal.

Corticosteroid weaning in the tacrolimus and mycophenolate era in heart transplantation: Clinical and neurohormonal benefits

BACKGROUND

Compared with cyclosporine, tacrolimus-based immunosuppression yields improved metabolic outcomes in heart transplantation. Whether corticosteroid freedom provides incremental metabolic benefits in tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil immunoprophylaxis remains uncertain.

METHODS

In a prospective trial, 41 heart transplant patients treated with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil underwent steroid weaning immediately after transplantation until weaning was complete. Weaning was interrupted only for treated rejection with or without hemodynamic compromise. Benefits of steroid weaning assessed following the first year included B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP), late infections, lipids, blood pressure, hyperglycemia, and body mass index (BMI).

RESULTS

Of this 41 patient cohort (age 53 +/- 9 years, 50% black American, 35% women) followed for a total of 47 +/- 5 months, 25 had corticosteroids discontinued (62%) by an average of 20 +/- 11 months. No differences between the two groups were noted in baseline characteristics. Significant predictors of failure to wean steroids included higher rejection, BNP, and lower dose of mycophenolate mofetil. No significant benefits of steroid weaning were noted on lipids, blood pressure, hyperglycemia, and BMI. However, late infections (after 1 year) requiring hospitalizations were more frequent in the failure to wean group (0.60.4 vs 0 infections/patient/y, P <.001).

INFERENCES

Unlike known metabolic benefits of steroid withdrawal with cyclosporine, heart transplant recipients treated with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil demonstrate no incremental metabolic benefits, but instead experience benefits of decreased serious late infections. Furthermore, failure to discontinue corticosteroids in this series is predicted by early allograft rejection, use of lower doses of mycophenolate mofetil, and higher BNP levels suggesting poor cardiac adaptation.

B-type natriuretic peptide in heart transplantation: an important marker of allograft performance

The successful management of a cardiac allograft recipient centers around detection of allograft dysfunction early and preferably in a noninvasive manner. Up to this point, echocardiography or right heart catherization with endomyocardial biopsy are the only definitive methods available to diagnose allograft dysfunction. However, these methods do not reflect early structural changes and neurohormonal aberrations involved in allograft dysfunction. B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) reflects ventricular wall stress and pressure and early studies have intimated potential usefulness of this marker in heart transplantation. Recent studies utilizing point-of-care BNP assay in heart transplant recipients have demonstrated elevated BNP levels at baseline compared with controls. Furthermore, the two most significant correlates of BNP levels are central hemodynamic perturbations despite preserved systolic function and presence of right sided cardiac dysfunction. Initial investigations have demonstrated BNP levels to serve as prognostic marker for cardiac related events and to track responses to therapeutic interventions. Further studies are needed to further assess the utility of BNP as surrogate marker for cardiac function and adaptation.