Mycophenolate mofetil in stable liver transplant patients with calcineurin inhibitor-induced renal impairment: single-center experience

Management of the liver transplant patient

Liver transplantation is currently the definitive treatment of end-stage liver disease. This article reviews the complex multidisciplinary care of the liver transplant recipient beginning immediately after transplantation but extending into the long term. The presentation, evaluation and treatment of common post-transplant complications are outlined. Importantly, immunosuppression strategies along with the issues of acute and chronic rejection are discussed in detail with an emphasis on how practice has evolved over time. The spectrum of infectious problems is systematically presented, based on the time since transplantation and the institution of immunosuppression. Finally, the substantial challenges of recurrent disease and long-term medical comorbidities are addressed as these are clearly the primary issues that threaten the longevity and wellbeing of the liver transplant recipient.

Conversion from a calcineurin inhibitor to everolimus therapy in maintenance liver transplant recipients: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial

Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) contribute to renal dysfunction following liver transplantation. This prospective, randomized, multicenter, 6-month study (with an additional 6 months of follow-up) evaluated whether everolimus with CNI reduction or discontinuation would improve renal function in maintenance liver transplant recipients experiencing CNI-related renal impairment. Patients started everolimus therapy with CNI reduction or discontinuation (n = 72) or continued receiving standard-exposure CNI (n = 73). At month 6, 80% of the patients who had converted to everolimus had discontinued the CNI. The mean change in creatinine clearance (CrCl) from baseline to month 6 was similar between groups (everolimus, 1.0 +/- 10.2 mL/minute; controls, 2.3 +/- 7.8 mL/minute; P = 0.46), so the primary study endpoint (8 mL/minute difference in the change in CrCl) was not achieved. Among patients who continued everolimus according to the protocol, the mean increase in CrCl was 2.1 (n = 53) and 3.8 mL/minute (n = 38) at months 6 and 12, respectively, versus 2.4 (n = 68) and 3.5 mL/minute in controls (n = 51). The high frequency of CNI dose reductions in controls (77% of the patients) and the relatively long mean time post-transplant (>3 years) likely contributed to the small difference in CrCl. Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred in 1.4% of the patients in each group, with no graft losses. Study drug discontinuation was higher in everolimus-treated patients, and adverse events were more frequent. These data demonstrate that everolimus allows for discontinuation or a major reduction of CNI exposure in liver allograft recipients suffering CNI-related renal dysfunction without a loss of efficacy. Trials targeting earlier conversion post-transplantation are required to confirm the efficacy and safety of everolimus for improving renal function after liver transplantation.

Mycophenolate mofetil promotes prolonged improvement of renal dysfunction after pediatric liver transplantation: experience of a single center

Few studies have evaluated the long-term use of MMF in liver transplanted children with renal dysfunction. The aim of this study is to report the experience of a pediatric transplantation center on the efficacy and security of long-term use of a MMF immunosuppressant protocol with reduced doses of CNIs in stable liver transplanted children with renal dysfunction secondary to prolonged use of CsA or Tac. Between 1988 and 2003, 191 children underwent OLT and 11 patients developed renal dysfunction secondary to CNIs toxicity as evaluated by biochemical renal function parameters. The interval between liver transplantation and the introduction of the protocol varied from one to 12 yr. Renal function was evaluated by biochemical parameters in five phases: immediately prior to MMF administration; 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after the introduction of MMF. Among the patients, nine of them (82%) showed improvement of renal function parameters in comparison with the pretreatment values. The two patients that did not show any improvement were patients in whom the interval of time between OLT and the introduction of MMF was longer. All parameters of liver function remained unchanged. No episodes of acute or chronic rejection or increases in infection rates during the period were detected. Two patients developed transitory diarrhea and leukopenia that were reverted with reduction of MMF dosage. In conclusion, in liver transplanted pediatric patients with CNI-induced chronic renal dysfunction, the administration of MMF in addition to reduced doses of CNIs promotes long-term improvement in renal function parameters with no additional risks.

Efficacy and safety of monotherapy with mycophenolate mofetil in liver transplantation

AIM

To analyze the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as monotherapy in liver transplant patients who have adverse effects associated with calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Seventeen patients, 13 men and four women, mean age 62 years, who received a liver transplant between 1998 and 2003 and initial immunosuppressive therapy with CNIs (10 tacrolimus and seven cyclosporine), were converted to monotherapy with MMF due to adverse events associated with CNIs: chronic renal failure in 16 patients (four with diabetes mellitus and seven with hypertension) and neurotoxicity in one patient. The mean time between transplant and starting monotherapy was 32 months (range: 18 to 70) and the mean follow-up time on monotherapy was 20 months (range: 8 to 39). MMF was introduced gradually at the same time as the CNIs were reduced.

RESULTS

There was a progressive decrease in creatinine during the initial months. Compared with baseline levels, the differences at 3 and 6 months of monotherapy were significant (P < .001), remaining so throughout the follow-up period. Renal function improved in 15 of 17 patients (88%) and normalized in 10 of 17 (60%). The patient with neurotoxicity due to CNI improved. One patient (6%) had moderate rejection that was corrected after reintroducing tacrolimus. In two patients it was necessary to suspend MMF, one due to gastrointestinal intolerance and the other due to severe myelotoxicity and Pneumocystis jiroveci infection. Other, minor adverse events were corrected by adjusting the dose: one herpes zoster, two diarrhea, and two anemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Monotherapy with MMF efficiently and safely corrected renal dysfunction associated with CNIs, with few side effects and a low incidence of rejection.

Impact of combined mycophenolate mofetil and low-dose calcineurin inhibitor therapy on renal function, cardiovascular risk factors, and graft function in liver transplant patients: preliminary results of an open prospective study

As liver transplantation (LT) is now being performed with excellent 1-year graft survival rates of 85% to 90%, attention has been shifted to reducing long-term complications of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI). We randomized LT patients (2:1) who displayed renal dysfunction under CNI treatment to either mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (1000 mg twice a day) followed by stepwise reduction of CNI (n = 21; Tac trough levels <4 ng/mL, CsA trough levels <50 ng/mL); or continue their current CNI dose (n = 11; control group). Three months after study entry, we observed significantly decreased mean values in the CNI reduction group of serum creatinine (1.88 +/- 0.36 versus 1.58 +/- 0.33 mg/dL, P < .001) and BUN (39.2 +/- 11.8 versus 29.9 +/- 9.59 mg/dL, P < .001) with a significantly increased GFR (51.4 +/- 10.8 versus 61.6 +/- 14.1 mL/min, P < .001). Improved renal function in these long-term LT recipients (5.6 +/- 3.6 years posttransplant; range, 2 to 13 years) suggests at least a partial reversibility of CNI-induced renal damage. Furthermore, we found an improved lipid profile as well as a significantly decreased mean systolic (140 +/- 19 versus 130 +/- 14 mm Hg, P < .01) and diastolic (82 +/- 9 to 74 +/- 8 mm Hg, P < .001) blood pressure 3 months after introduction of MMF therapy. Additionally, transaminases significantly improved in the CNI reduction group within this time period (ALT 37.9 +/- 25.9 versus 25.2 +/- 13.2, P < .05). MMF and CNI-reduced immunosuppressive regimens may improve long-term patient survival, suggesting a broad application within the liver transplant setting.

Mycophenolate mofetil monotherapy in liver transplant recipients: a single center experience

The long-term use of calcineurin inhibitors (CIs) is associated with significant morbidity in liver transplant recipients. Although mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is well tolerated, two small studies reported an unacceptable rate of acute allograft rejection in liver transplant recipients receiving MMF monotherapy. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the safety and efficacy of MMF monotherapy in liver transplant recipients. We reviewed the medical records of all patients who underwent liver transplant at our institution. Sixteen patients were identified who received MMF either as monotherapy (n = 13) or with corticosteroids (n = 3; 2 of them for other comorbid conditions), and these patients were studied to determine the efficacy and complications. Fifteen (15/16) patients were converted from a CI to MMF because of renal insufficiency. Patients were converted to MMF monotherapy after a median of 2,056 days (range, 606-5,893) after liver transplantation. The median postconversion follow-up was 668 days (range, 60-1,509). Four patients required dialysis despite conversion; of those patients not requiring dialysis, serum creatinine stabilized and showed a trend toward improvement (2.51 +/- 1.12 mg/dL to 1.85 +/- .58 mg/dL, P = .1). However, there were 3 episodes (47, 107, and 1,203 days after conversion) of severe, irreversible allograft rejection after conversion resulting in death in 2 patients and necessitating retransplantation in 1 patient. There were no patient characteristics, except perhaps African-American race, that predicted the development of rejection. In conclusion, MMF monotherapy was associated with a significant risk (19%) of unpredictable, severe, and irreversible allograft rejection even among long-term transplant survivors. Caution should be exercised before converting patients to MMF monotherapy.