Pre- and postrenal transplantation pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine microemulsion

From gut to kidney: transporting and metabolizing calcineurin-inhibitors in solid organ transplantation

Since their introduction circa 35 years ago, calcineurin-inhibitors (CNI) have become the cornerstone of immunosuppressive therapy in solid organ transplantation. However, CNI's possess a narrow therapeutic index with potential severe consequences of drug under- or overexposure. This demands a meticulous policy of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) to optimize outcome. In clinical practice optimal dosing is difficult to achieve due to important inter- and intraindividual variation in CNI pharmacokinetics. A complex and often interdependent set of factors appears relevant in determining drug exposure. These include recipient characteristics such as age, race, body composition, organ function, and food intake, but also graft-related characteristics such as: size, donor-age, and time after transplantation can be important. Fundamental (in vitro) and clinical studies have pointed out the intrinsic relation between the aforementioned variables and the functional capacity of enzymes and transporters involved in CNI metabolism, primarily located in intestine, liver and kidney. Commonly occurring polymorphisms in genes responsible for CNI metabolism (CYP3A4, CYP3A5, CYP3A7, PXR, POR, ABCB1 (P-gp) and possibly UGT) are able to explain an important part of interindividual variability. In particular, a highly prevalent SNP in CYP3A5 has proven to be an important determinant of CNI dose requirements and drug-dose-interactions. In addition, a discrepancy in genotype between graft and receptor has to be taken into account. Furthermore, common phenomena in solid organ transplantation such as inflammation, ischemia- reperfusion injury, graft function, co-medication, altered food intake and intestinal motility can have a differential effect on the expression enzymes and transporters involved in CNI metabolism. Notwithstanding the built-up knowledge, predicting individual CNI pharmacokinetics and dose requirements on the basis of current clinical and experimental data remains a challenge.

Factors that affect concentrations of cyclosporine during the induction period of kidney transplantation: multivariate analysis

OBJECTIVE

The pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine (CsA) depend on numerous factors over the transplantation course. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of several clinical variables on CsA concentrations during the induction period after kidney transplantation.

METHODS

Potential variables were contrasted with CsA concentrations at 2 hours postdose (C(2)) and with the area under the concentration curve of CsA (AUC) at days 3 and 10 after transplantation. Evaluated variables were: recipient age, gender, body mass index (BMI), type/duration of previous dialysis, pretransplant serum creatinine (sCr), donor type, CsA dose, cold ischemia time, reduction of sCr, and use of other immunosuppressive drugs.

RESULTS

This series included 112 patients who displayed an average age of 43 ± 13 years, including 62 men and 31 recipients of living donor organs. The induction dose of CsA was 8.36 ± 1.53 mg/kg. On day 3, the C(2) was related to the reduction of sCr (P = 0.034) and to the BMI (P = 0.033). There was an inverse correlation with pretransplant sCr (P = 0.012). The AUC correlated with BMI (P = 0.027) and living donor category (P = .002). Patients receiving rapamycin or a locally procured kidney showed a trend toward higher AUC values. On day 10, the CsA dose and use of rapamycin showed a trend to higher values of C(2); the AUC was related to the CsA dose (P = .034). None of the other variables showed significant effects. Analysis between variables showed that time on dialysis correlated with the pretransplant sCr (P = .002) and that the CsA dose was negatively associated with BMI (P = .009).

CONCLUSION

Pretransplant sCr, BMI, living donor kidney category, better functional recovery, and the dose of CsA were predictors of CsA concentrations of clinical interest during this induction period. The effect of BMI was not related to higher doses of CsA.

A drug transporter for all ages? ABCB1 and the developmental pharmacogenetics of cyclosporine

Evaluation of: Fanta S, Niemi M, Jönsson S et al.: Pharmacogenetics of cyclosporine in children suggests an age-dependent influence of ABCB1polymorphisms. Pharmacogenet. Genomics 18(2), 77-90 (2008). The clinical use of the immunosuppressive agent cyclosporine is complicated by its toxicity, narrow therapeutic window and highly variable pharmacokinetics between individuals. In adults, genetic polymorphisms in the genes encoding the cyclosporine-metabolizing enzymes CYP3A4 and CYP3A5, as well as the ABCB1 gene, which encodes the efflux-pump P-glycoprotein, seem to have a limited effect, if any, on cyclosporine pharmacokinetics. However, the authors have now reported for the first time an association between cyclosporine oral bioavailability and the ABCB1 c.1236C>T and c.2677G>T polymorphisms, as well as the related haplotype c.1199G-c.1236C-c.2677G-c.3435C, in children with end-stage renal disease older than 8 years of age. Carriers of the variant alleles had a cyclosporine oral bioavailability that was around 1.5-times higher compared with noncarriers. This association was not observed in children younger than 8 years of age. In addition, no relation between cyclosporine disposition and genetic variation in the CYP3A4, CYP3A5, ABCC2, SLCO1B1 and NR1I2 genes was observed. These data suggest that the effect of ABCB1 polymorphisms on cyclosporine pharmacokinetics is related to age, and thus developmental stage. Although further study is necessary to establish the predictive value of ABCB1 genotyping for individualization of cyclosporine therapy in children older than 8 years, an important step towards further personalized immunosuppressive drug therapy has been made.

Developmental pharmacokinetics of ciclosporin--a population pharmacokinetic study in paediatric renal transplant candidates

AIMS

To use population pharmacokinetic modelling to characterize the influence of developmental and demographic factors on the pharmacokinetic variability of ciclosporin.

METHODS

Pharmacokinetic modelling was performed in NONMEM using a dataset comprising 162 pretransplant children, aged 0.36-17.5 years. Ciclosporin was given intravenously (3 mg kg(-1)) and orally (10 mg kg(-1)) on separate occasions followed by blood sampling for 24 h.

RESULTS

A three-compartment model with first-order absorption without lag-time best described the pharmacokinetics of ciclosporin. The most important covariate affecting systemic clearance (CL) and distribution volume (V) was body weight (BW; scaled allometrically), responsible for a fourfold difference in uncorrected ciclosporin CL and a sixfold difference in ciclosporin V. The other significant covariates, haematocrit, plasma cholesterol and creatinine, were estimated to explain 20-30% of interindividual differences in CL and V of ciclosporin. No age-related changes in oral bioavailability or in BW-normalized V were seen. The BW-normalized CL (CL/BW) declined with age and prepubertal children (<8 years) had an approximately 25% higher CL/BW than did older children. Normalization of CL for allometric BW (BW(3/4)) removed its relationship to age.

CONCLUSION

The relationship between CL and allometric BW is consistent with a gradual reduction in relative liver size, until adult values, and a relatively constant CYP3A4 content in the liver from about 6-12 months of age to adulthood. Ciclosporin oral bioavailability, known previously to display large interindividual variability, is not influenced by age. These findings can enable better individualization of ciclosporin dosing in infants, children and adolescents.

Assessment of the bioequivalence of a generic cyclosporine A by a randomized controlled trial in stable renal recipients

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the bioequivalence of Cysporin, a generic cyclosporine A, compared with Neoral in stable renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

Study design consisted of an open label, two-way crossover, randomized controlled trial of Cysporin versus Neoral in stable renal transplant recipients. In all, 33 patients were enrolled; 31 were randomized and 28 were evaluable. AUCs(0-12) were done on day 14 and 28; C(0) and C(2) were done on days 0, 7, 21 and 35. Dose conversion was 1:1. Outcome measures for serum cyclosporin A concentrations expressed as the mean+/-SD were AUC(0-12) (microg x hr/L), C(max) (microg/L), C(2) (microg/L), T(max) (hr) and T(1/2) (hr). Mean and 90% CI of the ratio Cysporin/Neoral of log-transformed data were calculated using a general linear model.

RESULTS

The main pharmacokinetic features were: AUC(0-12): Cysporin 3495+/-1319, Neoral 3853+/-1378 (P<0.05); C(max): Cysporin 755+/-301, Neoral 881+/-368 (P<0.05); C(2): Cysporin 613+/-235, Neoral 672+/-255 (P>0.05); T(max): Cysporin 1.9+/-0.8, Neoral 1.4+/-0.6 (P<0.005); and T1/2: Cysporin 8.8+/-4.3, Neoral 8.7+/-6.2 (P>0.05). Estimated ratios of Cysporin/Neoral were: AUC 0.93 (90% CI 0.88-0.98; P<0.05); C(max) 0.88 (90% CI 0.80-0.97; P<0.05); and T(max) 1.32 (90% CI 1.14-1.53; P<0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Both the extent and rate of absorption of Cysporin are significantly less than those of Neoral. The 90% CI for the ratios of Cysporin/Neoral for AUC and C(max) lie within 0.80-1.25. Hence in this clinical context Cysporin is pharmacologically bioequivalent with Neoral. This study illustrates the importance of testing bioequivalence of generic cyclosporine A products in transplant recipients not healthy volunteers.

Limitations of C2 monitoring in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Recent developments have proposed the cyclosporin (CsA) concentration at 2 h post-dose (C(2)) as the best single time-point predictor of the extent of CsA exposure and as the optimal basis for monitoring immunosuppressive therapy in renal transplant patients. The present study sought to validate the cornerstones of the current concept of C(2) monitoring.

METHODS

We assessed the predictive value, dose proportionality and intrapatient variability of C(2) levels in 41 de novo renal transplant recipients treated with CsA microemulsion, steroids, mycophenolate sodium and basiliximab.

RESULTS

Patients with rejection and patients with CsA nephrotoxicity had lower C(2) (P = NS) and absorption (P<0.05 for toxicity), while C(0) did not show any significant difference. Receiver operating characteristic analysis did not detect discriminative C(2) values as a predictor of rejection or toxicity. In a substantial number of patients (29%) we observed poor and/or slow absorption, with C(0) >300 ng/ml and C(2) levels <800 ng/ml during the first month and a high rate of complications in these patients (18% rejection, 64% toxicity). Absorption increased over the first month post-transplant. Analysis of dose changes indicated that C(2) levels are not dose-proportional. Intrapatient variability of C(2) was as high as that of C(0).

CONCLUSIONS

C(2) levels do not predict rejection or toxicity. C(2) monitoring alone does not detect toxicity in poor and/or slow absorbers, who constitute a significant proportion of patients. Changes in absorption over time, high intrapatient variability and lack of dose proportionality constitute further limitations of the C(2) monitoring concept in the early post-transplant phase.