Impact of selected factors on early graft function in patients after renal transplantation

Fractional creatinine clearance of the donated kidney using Cockcroft-Gault formula as a predictor of graft function after living donor transplantation

To prevent hyperfiltration of the renal allograft, it is important to initially provide adequate functioning nephrons to meet the metabolic demands of a recipient. During the preoperative evaluation of a potential kidney donor, it is necessary to estimate the renal function of donated kidney compared with the metabolic needs of the recipient. The functional ratio of each kidney was measured using technetium-99m diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid. The serum creatinine (Scr, mg/dL) and estimated creatinine clearance (Ccr, mL/min/1.73 m(2)) using the Cockcroft-Gault formula were measured and calculated in 82 donors. We excluded recipients who had an episode of rejection, and followed all recipients for more than 6 months posttransplantation. The average functional proportion of the donated kidney was 50.5% +/- 4.7% of the total Ccr 83.4 +/- 18.3 of donors. The Scr of recipients at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months posttransplantation were significantly (P < .05) correlated with the fractional Ccr of the donated kidney; however, Scr at 1 year was not correlated (P = .307). Furthermore, the Ccr of the recipient at 1, 3, and 6 months posttransplantation were significantly (P < .05) correlated with the fractional Ccr of the donated kidney; however, the Ccr at 9 months and 1 year were not correlated (P = .094 and .141, respectively). The Scr and Ccr of recipients within 6 months after transplantation may depend on the functional mass of the donated kidney, which should be estimated prior to kidney donation and compared with the metabolic demands of the potential recipient.

Endoglin regulates renal ischaemia-reperfusion injury

BACKGROUND

Renal ischaemia-reperfusion (I-R) can cause acute tubular necrosis and chronic renal deterioration. Endoglin, an accessory receptor for Transforming Growth Factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1), is expressed on activated endothelium during macrophage maturation and implicated in the control of fibrosis, angiogenesis and inflammation.

METHODS

Endoglin expression was monitored over 14 days after renal I-R in rats. As endoglin-null mice are not viable, the role of endoglin in I-R was studied by comparing renal I-R injury in haploinsufficient mice (Eng(+/-)) and their wild-type littermates (Eng(+/+)). Renal function, morphology and molecular markers of acute renal injury and inflammation were compared.

RESULTS

Endoglin mRNA up-regulation in the post-ischaemic kidneys of rats occurred at 12 h after I-R; endoglin protein levels were elevated throughout the study period. Expression was initially localized to the vascular endothelium, then extended to fibrotic and inflamed areas of the interstitium. Two days after I-R, plasma creatinine elevation and acute tubular necrosis were less marked in Eng(+/-) than in Eng(+/+) mice. Significant up-regulation of endoglin protein was found only in the post-ischaemic kidneys of Eng(+/+) mice and coincided with an increased mRNA expression of the TGF-beta1 and collagen IV (alpha1) chain genes. Significant increases in vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) expression, nitrosative stress, myeloperoxidase activity and CD68 staining for macrophages were evident in post-ischaemic kidneys of Eng(+/+), but not Eng(+/-) mice, suggesting that impaired endothelial activation and macrophage maturation may account for the reduced injury in post-ischaemic kidneys of Eng(+/-) mice.

CONCLUSIONS

Endoglin is up-regulated in the post-ischaemic kidney and endoglin-haploinsufficient mice are protected from renal I-R injury. Endoglin may play a primary role in promoting inflammatory responses following renal I-R.

Arterial Anastomosis Without Sutures Using Ring Pin Stapler for Clinical Renal Transplantation: Comparison With Suture Anastomosis

PURPOSE

The metal ring pin stapler was initially developed for microvascular surgery and there has been little experience of their use in larger vessels. We determined if the titanium ring pin coupling system could be safely and rapidly applied for arterial reconstruction in clinical renal transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The donor renal artery was end-to-end anastomosed to the internal iliac artery with titanium ring pin staplers in 36 patients. Anastomotic, clamp and total operative time and vascular problems were compared with those in the control group of sutured anastomosis in 39 transplant recipients.

RESULTS

The completion of mechanical anastomosis required half the time of suture anastomosis. Mean clamp time was 17.8 minutes in the nonsuture group and 28.1 minutes in the control group. There was no significant difference in total operative time between the 2 groups. A small anastomotic line leak was noted in each group, which was temporary and self-limited. There were no postoperative anastomotic failures, postoperative bleeding episodes or need to revise the anastomosis (100% patency rate) in the 2 groups. Of the patients 61 were followed for 2 to 5 years. Transplant renal artery stenosis was observed in 1 patient in the nonsuture group but 3 in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The anastomotic technique with the ring pin system is safe and simple, permitting an expeditious and everting anastomosis with a smooth intima-to-intima junction. Application of this technique may decrease warm ischemia time and the incidence of anastomotic artery stenosis, thus, improving outcomes.

Are Autoimmune Diseases or Glomerulonephritis Affecting the Development of Panel-Reactive Antibodies in Candidates for Renal Transplantation?

Panel-reactive antibodies (PRA) are a major obstacle to kidney transplantation (KTx). It is not completely clear why only some patients develop PRA, whereas others do not. We hypothesized that other factors, such as autoimmune diseases involving the kidney, might be a trigger for PRA development. We reviewed the original diseases that led to renal failure and their possible role in PRA development. Charts of 270 patients on the active waiting list for KTx were reviewed for complete demographics, presence of PRA, peak PRA level, first KTx or retransplantation, original disease, blood transfusions, pregnancy and rejection. Patients were divided into group 1 (PRA >10%) and group 2 (PRA <10%). There was a significantly higher proportion of patients in group 1 with autoimmune diseases than in group 2. The same proportion was found significant for all of the patients as well as for the patients listed for the first KTx (new patients). Previous KTx has significant impact on both class I and II peak PRA levels when compared with new patients who are already sensitized. A subanalysis of retransplantation showed patients with autoimmune disease (54%) have more graft loss due to rejection compared with nonautoimmune disease (43%). There is an association between high PRA level and autoimmune diseases causing renal failure regardless of the previous KTx status. Besides the risk of recurrence, autoimmune disease seems to affect the risk of graft loss due to rejection.

Immunological monitoring of posttransplant allograft sensitization following living related donor renal transplantation

A better understanding of the immunobiological processes and predictors of graft rejection holds promise for development of new therapeutic strategies and also for individualization of immunosuppression. The objective of this study was to analyze the clinical relevance of immune parameters, such as recipient sensitization status, donor-specific antibodies, and anti-HLA antibodies, which are major predictors of graft outcome following renal transplantation. Sera from 264 renal recipients at different posttransplant period were included for detection of anti-donor antibodies (by flowcytometry); anti-HLA, antibody (by ELISA), and panel-reactive antibodies (PRA) by complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) methods. Graft survival was analyzed in relation to posttransplant PRA at 2 years follow-up time: overall survival was significantly compromised in the highly sensitized group (group III) compared to the other two groups (overall chi2 = 24.20, P = 5.5 x 10(-06)). Flow cytometric cross-matches revealed the presence of anti-donor class I antibodies (T+) in 39 patients who had a poor graft survival of 51% compared with 85% survival in 225 antibody-negative patients. (chi2 = 22.260, P = 2.381 x 10(-.06)). Further analysis was performed based on the presence or absence of FCXM and ELISA-detected antibodies. Recipients belonging to group I (ELISA+/FCXM+) showed significantly lower graft survival (43%) compared with that observed in group II, which were essentially nonsensitized individuals (90%; P = 3.1 x 10(-08)). The graft survival in the ELISA-/FCXM+ group was 63%, which was significantly lower than that in group II (P = 5.14 x 10(-03)). Group IV (ELISA+/FCXM-) including 38 (14%) serum samples with nondonor but HLA-specific antibodies was associated with significantly poorer graft survival (63%) compared with group II (P = 6.6 x 10(-05)). Our data also show that while FCXM is the most sensitive test to detect donor-specific antibodies, the ELISA method offers the additional advantage of detecting anti-HLA class-I antibodies, which are detrimental for renal graft survival. Thus the use of multiple parameters to assess recipient immune profile can predict graft outcome more accurately thus helping the individualization and optimization of immunosuppression.