Biliary reconstruction during liver transplantation in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis

Meta-analysis of Duct-to-duct versus Roux-en-Y biliary reconstruction following liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis

This meta-analysis aimed to compare outcomes following bile duct reconstruction in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) undergoing liver transplantation depending on whether duct-to-duct or Roux-en-Y anastomosis was utilized. An electronic search was performed of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed databases using both subject headings (MeSH) and truncated word searches. Pooled risk ratios and mean difference were calculated using the fixed-effects and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Ten studies including 910 patients met the inclusion criteria. There was no difference in the overall incidence of biliary strictures between the two groups [odds ratio (OR) 1.06 (0.68, 1.66); (P = 0.80)]. The anastomotic stricture rate was similar, [OR 1.18 (0.56, 2.50); (P = 0.67)]. Ascending cholangitis was higher in the Roux-en-Y group [OR 2.91 (1.17, 7.23); (P = 0.02)]. Anastomotic bile leak rates, graft survival, PSC recurrence and number of patients diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma following transplantation were comparable between both groups. Duct-to-duct and Roux-en-Y reconstruction had comparable outcomes. Both techniques are associated with similar incidence of biliary stricture. The bilioenteric reconstruction was associated with a higher risk of cholangitis. The incidence of de novo cholangiocarcinoma was similar in both groups. Duct-to-duct reconstruction should be considered when feasible in patients with PSC.

Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy versus duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis in liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy and duct-to-duct anastomosis are potential methods for biliary reconstruction in liver transplantation (LT) for recipients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). However, there is controversy over which method yields superior outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of duct-to-duct versus Roux-en-Y biliary anastomosis in patients undergoing LT for PSC.

METHODS

Studies comparing Roux-en-Y versus duct-to-duct anastomosis during LT for PSC were identified based on systematic searches of 9 electronic databases and multiple sources of gray literature.

RESULTS

The search identified 496 citations, including 7 retrospective series, and 692 patients met eligibility criteria. The use of duct-to-duct anastomosis was not associated with a significant difference in clinical outcomes, including 1-year recipient survival rates (odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-1.60; P = .95), 1-year graft survival rates (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.72-1.71; P = .64), risk of biliary leaks (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.59-2.59; P = .33), risk of biliary strictures (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 0.98-4.06; P = .06), or rate of recurrence of PSC (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.19-4.78; P = .94).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in 1-year recipient survival, 1-year graft survival, risk of biliary complications, and PSC recurrence between Roux-en-Y and duct-to-duct biliary anastomosis in LT for PSC.

Duct-to-duct reconstruction in liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis is associated with fewer biliary complications in comparison with hepaticojejunostomy

There is no consensus on the preferred type of biliary reconstruction for patients undergoing orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). The aim of this study was to compare long-term outcomes after OLT for PSC using either duct-to-duct anastomosis or Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy for biliary reconstruction. In a consecutive series of 98 adult patients undergoing OLT for PSC, 45 underwent duct-to-duct reconstruction, and 53 underwent Roux-en-Y biliary reconstruction. The median follow-up was 8.2 years (interquartile range = 3.9-14.5 years). The outcomes of the 2 groups were compared. There were no significant differences in patient demographics or general surgical variables between the groups. The overall patient and graft survival rates were similar for the 2 groups. The incidence of biliary strictures and biliary leakage within the first year after transplantation did not differ between the 2 groups. However, significantly more patients in the Roux-en-Y group suffered at least 1 episode of cholangitis within the first year (9% in the duct-to-duct group versus 25% in the Roux-en-Y group, P = 0.04). In addition, Roux-en-Y reconstruction was associated with a significantly higher rate of late-onset (>1 year after transplantation) nonanastomotic biliary strictures (NAS) in comparison with duct-to-duct reconstruction (24% versus 7% at 5 years and 30% versus 7% at 10 years, P = 0.01). In conclusion, duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction in patients with PSC is associated with lower rates of posttransplant cholangitis and late-onset NAS in comparison with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. If technically and anatomically feasible, duct-to-duct anastomosis can be performed safely in patients undergoing OLT for PSC.

Duct-to-duct biliary reconstruction in orthotopic liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis: a viable and safe alternative

Roux-en-Y loop is considered the reconstruction method of choice in Orthotopic Liver Transplantation (OLT) for Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC). We have adopted an approach of duct-to-duct (D-D) reconstruction when recipient common bile duct is free of gross disease. Patients were divided into two groups: patients who underwent a Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy and patients who had a D-D anastomosis. Morbidity, mortality, disease recurrence and graft and patient survival were compared between the two groups and analyzed. Ninety-one patients had OLT for PSC. Sixty-three patients underwent a D-D biliary reconstruction, whereas 28 patients had a Roux-en-Y loop. Biliary leak complicated 8% from the D-D group, and 14% from the Roux-en-Y group (P = 0.08), whereas biliary strictures were identified in 10% vs. 7% patients from the D-D and Roux-en-Y group, respectively (P = 0.9). Actuarial 1, 3 and 10 year survival for D-D and Roux-en-Y group was (87%, 80% and 62%) and (82%, 73% and 73%), respectively (P = 0.7). The corresponding 1, 3 and 10 year graft survival was (72%, 58% and 42%) and (67%, 58% and 53%), respectively (P = 0.6). No difference was seen in disease recurrence rates. D-D biliary reconstruction in OLT for selected PSC patients remains our first option of reconstruction.

Matrix metalloproteinase 2 genotype is associated with nonanastomotic biliary strictures after orthotopic liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Nonanastomotic biliary strictures (NAS) are a serious complication after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are involved in connective tissue remodelling in chronic liver disease and complications after OLT.

AIM

To evaluate the relationship between MMP-2 and MMP-9 gene polymorphisms and NAS.

METHODS

MMP-2 (-1306 C/T) and MMP-9 (-1562 C/T) gene promoter polymorphisms were analysed in 314 recipient-donor combinations. Serum levels of these MMPs were determined in subgroups of patients as well. NAS were identified with various radiological imaging studies performed within 4 years after OLT and defined as any stricture, dilation or irregularity of the intra- or extrahepatic bile ducts of the liver graft followed by an intervention, after exclusion of hepatic artery thrombosis and anastomotic strictures.

RESULTS

The average incidence of NAS was 15%. The major clinical risk factor for the development of NAS was PSC in the recipient. The presence of the MMP-2 CT genotype in donor and/or recipient was associated with a significantly higher incidence of NAS, up to 29% when both donor and recipient had the MMP-2 CT genotype (P=0.003). In the multivariate analyses, pre-OLT PSC (hazard ratio 2.1, P=0.02) and MMP-2 CT genotype (hazard ratio 3.5, P=0.003) were found to be independent risk factors for the development of NAS after OLT. No obvious association was found between NAS and the MMP-9 genotype and serum levels of the MMPs.

CONCLUSION

MMP-2 CT genotype of donor and recipient is an independent risk factor, in addition to PSC, for the development of NAS after OLT.

Biliary reconstruction, its complications and management of biliary complications after adult liver transplantation: a systematic review of the incidence, risk factors and outcome

Biliary reconstruction remains common in postoperative complications after liver transplantation. A systematic search was conducted on the PubMed database and 61 studies of retrospective or prospective institutional data were eligible for this review. The study comprised a total of 14,359 liver transplantations. The overall incidence of biliary stricture was 13%; 12% among deceased donor liver transplantation (DDLT) patients and 19% among living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) recipients. The overall incidence of biliary leakage was 8.2%, 7.8% among DDLT patients and 9.5% among LDLT recipients. An endoscopic strategy is the first choice for biliary complications; 83% of patients with biliary stricture were treated by endoscopic modalities with a success rate of 57% and 38% of patients with leakage were indicated for endoscopic biliary drainage. T-tube placement was not performed in 82% of duct-to-duct reconstruction. The incidence of biliary stricture was 10% with a T-tube and 13% without a T-tube and the incidence of leakage was 5% with a T-tube and 6% without a T-tube. A preceding bile leak and LDLT procedure are accepted risk factors for anastomotic stricture. Biliary complications remain common, which requires further investigation and the refinement of reconstruction techniques and management strategies.

Is Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy an independent risk factor for nonanastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation?

Biliary reconstruction using Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy has been suggested as a risk factor for the development of nonanastomotic biliary strictures (NAS) after liver transplantation. Roux-en-Y reconstruction, however, is preferentially used in patients transplanted for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), and the disease itself is also associated with a higher incidence of NAS. The aim of this study was to determine whether Roux-en-Y reconstruction is really an independent risk factor for NAS. A series of 486 consecutive adult liver transplants were studied. Biliary reconstruction in patients transplanted for PSC was either by Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy or by duct-to-duct anastomosis, depending on the quality of the recipient's extrahepatic bile duct. Univariate and multivariate statistical analyses were used to identify risk factors for the development of NAS. The overall incidence of NAS was 16.5% (80/486). In univariate analyses, the following variables were significantly associated with NAS: PSC as the indication for transplantation, type of biliary reconstruction (Roux-en-Y versus duct-to-duct), and postoperative cytomegalovirus infection. After multivariate logistic regression analysis, PSC as the indication for transplantation (odds ratio, 2.813; 95% confidence interval, 1.624-4.875; P < 0.001) and postoperative cytomegalovirus infection (odds ratio, 2.098; 95% confidence interval, 1.266-3.477; P = 0.004) remained as independent risk factors for NAS. Biliary reconstruction using Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy was not identified as an independent risk factor for NAS. In conclusion, the association between Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy and NAS observed in previous studies can be explained by the more frequent use of Roux-en-Y reconstruction in patients with PSC. Roux-en-Y reconstruction itself is not an independent risk factor for NAS. Liver Transpl 15:924-930, 2009. (c) 2009 AASLD.

Biliary complications after liver transplantation: A review

After liver transplantation, the prevalence of complications related to the biliary system is 6-35%. In recent years, the diagnosis and treatment of biliary problems has changed markedly. The two standard methods of biliary reconstruction in liver transplant recipients are the duct-to-duct choledochocholedochostomy and the Roux-en-Y-hepaticojejunostomy. Biliary leakage occurs in approximately 5-7% of transplant cases. Leakage from the site of anastomosis, the T-tube exit site and donor or recipient remnant cystic duct is well described. Symptomatic bile leakage should be treated by stenting of the duct by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) or percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography (PTCD). Biliary strictures can occur at the site of the anastomosis (anastomotic stricture; AS) or at other locations in the biliary tree (non-anastomotic strictures; NAS). AS occur in 5-10% of cases and are due to fibrotic healing. Treatment by ERCP or PTCD with dilatation and progressive stenting is successful in the majority of cases. NAS can occur in the context of a hepatic artery thrombosis, or with an open hepatic artery (ischaemic type biliary lesions or ITBL). The incidence is 5-10%. NAS has been associated with various types of injury, e.g. macrovascular, microvascular, immunological and cytotoxic injury by bile salts. Treatment can be attempted with multiple sessions of dilatation and stenting of stenotic areas by ERCP or PTCD. In cases of localized diseased and good graft function, biliary reconstructive surgery is useful. However, a significant number of patients will need a re-transplant. When biliary strictures or ischaemia of the graft are present, stones, casts and sludge can develop.

Biliary strictures following liver transplantation: past, present and preventive strategies

Biliary complications are still the major source of morbidity for liver transplant recipients. The reported incidence of biliary strictures is 5%-15% after deceased donor liver transplantation and 28%-32% after right-lobe live donor surgery. Presentation is usually within the first year, but the incidence is known to increase with longer follow-up. The anastomotic variant is due to technical factors, whereas the nonanastomotic form is due to immunological and ischemic events, which later may lead to graft loss. Endoscopic management of anastomotic strictures achieves a success rate of 70%-100%; it drops to 50%-75% for nonanastomotic strictures with a higher recurrence rate. Results of endoscopic maneuvers are disappointing for biliary strictures after live donor liver transplantation, and the success rate is 60%-75% for anastomotic strictures and 25%-33% for the nonanastomotic variant. Preventive strategies in the cadaveric donor include the standardization of the type of anastomosis and maintenance of a vascularized ductal stump. In right-lobe live donor livers, donor liver duct harvesting also involves a major risk. The concept of high hilar intrahepatic Glissonian dissection, dissecting the artery and the duct as one unit, use of microsurgical techniques for smaller ducts, use of ductoplasty, and flexibility in the performance of double ductal anastomosis are the critical components of the preventive strategies in the recipient. In the case of live donors, judicious use of intraoperative cholangiograms, minimal dissection of the hilar plate, and perpendicular transection of the duct constitute the underlying principals for obtaining a vascularized duct.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in post-orthotopic liver transplant population with Roux-en-Y biliary reconstruction

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) is a well-established modality for diagnostic and therapeutic maneuvers in pancreaticobiliary disorders. However, it is technically more challenging in patients with postsurgical anatomy like Roux-en-Y anastomoses. Its effectiveness in post-orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) patients with Roux-en-Y biliary reconstruction has not been reported. We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of ERC in this patient population. A total of 132 OLTs with Roux-en-Y biliary reconstruction were performed at our institution from June 1998 to August 2005. Data from consenting patients who underwent ERC were reviewed once they were identified through computerized medical index system. Of 132 OLT patients with Roux-en-Y biliary reconstruction, 31 patients (9 female and 22 male subjects ranging in age from 11 months to 70 years) underwent ERC. The indication for liver transplant was end-stage liver disease or occurrence of cholangiocarcinoma from primary sclerosing cholangitis in 28 patients and a case each of chronic hepatitis C, alcoholic liver disease, and metastatic islet cell carcinoma. A variable-stiffness pediatric colonoscope was used in most cases. ERC indications were both diagnostic and therapeutic and included the following: evaluation of increased liver biochemistries and fever in 12 patients, dilation of anastomotic biliary strictures in 10 patients, removal of fractured biliary tube or retained biliary stent in 6 patients, and in 1 patient each, biliary stone removal, management of bile leak, and jejunal tube extension placement for nutritional purpose. ERC was successful in 22 patients (71%). There were no postprocedural complications. Although ERC is technically more difficult and time-consuming in OLT patients with Roux-en-Y anastomoses, these data suggest that ERC is an effective and safe diagnostic and therapeutic modality with few or no complications when performed by experienced endoscopists. ERC was successful in most patients and allowed therapeutic interventions that obviated the need for percutaneous radiological intervention or surgery.

Nonanastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation, part 1: Radiological features and risk factors for early vs. late presentation

Nonanastomotic biliary strictures (NAS) are a serious complication after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The exact pathogenesis is unclear. Purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for the development of NAS after OLT. A total of 487 adult liver transplants with a median follow-up of 7.9 years were studied. All imaging studies of the biliary tree were reviewed. Cholangiography was routinely performed between postoperative days 10-14 and later on demand. Localization of NAS at first presentation was categorized into 4 anatomical zones of the biliary tree. Severity of NAS was semiquantified as mild, moderate, or severe. Donor, recipient, and surgical characteristics and variables were analyzed to identify risk factors for NAS. NAS developed in 81 livers (16.6%). Thirty-seven (7.3%) were graded as moderate to severe. In 85% of the cases, anatomical localization of NAS was around or below the bifurcation of the common bile duct. A large variation was observed in the time interval between OLT and first presentation of NAS (median 4.1 months; range 0.3-155 months). NAS presenting early (< or =1 year) after OLT were associated with preservation-related risk factors. Cold and warm ischemia times were significantly longer in patients with early NAS compared with NAS presenting late (>1 year) after OLT (694 minutes vs. 490 minutes, P = 0.01, and 57 minutes vs. 53 minutes, P < 0.05, respectively), and early NAS were more frequently located in the central bile ducts. NAS presenting late (>1 year) after OLT were found more frequently in the periphery of the liver and were more frequently associated with immunological factors, such as primary sclerosing cholangitis, as the indication for OLT (24% vs. 45%, P < 0.05). By separating cases of NAS on the basis of the time of presentation after transplantation, we were able to identify differences in risk factors, indicating different pathogenic mechanisms depending on the time of initial presentation.

Anastomotic biliary strictures after liver transplantation: causes and consequences

We retrospectively studied the prevalence, presentation, results of treatment, and graft and patient survival of grafts developing an anastomotic biliary stricture (AS) in 531 adult liver transplantations performed between 1979 and 2003. Clinical and laboratory information was obtained from the hospital files, and radiological studies were re-evaluated. Twenty-one possible risk factors for the development of AS (variables of donor, recipient, surgical procedure, and postoperative course) were analyzed in a univariate and stepwise multivariate model. Forty-seven grafts showed an anastomotic stricture: 42 in duct-to-duct anastomoses, and 5 in hepaticojejunal Roux-en-Y anastomoses. The cumulative risk of AS after 1, 5, and 10 years was 6.6%, 10.6%, and 12.3% respectively. Postoperative bile leakage (P = 0.001), a female donor/male recipient combination (P = 0.010), and the era of transplantation (P = 0.006) were independent risk factors for the development of an AS. In 47% of cases, additional (radiologically minor) nonanastomotic strictures were diagnosed. All patients were successfully treated by 1 or more treatment modalities. As primary treatment, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) was successful in 24 of 36 (67%) cases and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage in 4 of 11 (36%). In the end 15 patients (32%) were operated, all with long-term success. AS presenting more than 6 months after transplantation needed more episodes of stenting by ERCP, and more stents per episode compared to those presenting within 6 months and recurred more often. Graft and patient survival were not impaired by AS.

Surgical complications and long-term outcome of different biliary reconstructions in liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis-choledochoduodenostomy versus choledochojejunostomy

Choledochojejunostomy (CJS) is commonly used for biliary reconstruction in liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). We alternatively performed choledochoduodenostomy (CDS) and side-to-side choledochodocholedochstomy in a large cohort of patients. Fifty-one patients with PSC, transplanted between 1988 and 2000, were analyzed retrospectively. Biliary reconstruction was CDS in 25 (49%), CJS in 20 (39%) and CC in 6 transplantations (12%). Biliary leaks occurred in the early follow-up (< or =41 days) only in CDS patients (20%). However, in the late follow-up (>4 months), stricturing of anastomosis was found once in CDS (4%) and CJS (5%). Later (>9 months), intrahepatic bile duct strictures were diagnosed in four CDS (16%), one CJS (5%) and one CC (17%) patient(s). In 48% of CDS (12/25), 60% of CJS (12/20) and 17% of CC (1/6) at least one incidence of cholangitis was observed. Overall, biliary complication rates were significantly higher in CDS (40%) than CJS (10%) and CC (17%); of those none in CC and 12% in CDS were anastomosis-related. Graft/patient survival showed no significant differences among groups. Based on our results we consider CJS the standard method for biliary reconstruction in PSC; however, in selected cases where CJS is difficult to accomplish because of previous surgery or for retransplantation, CDS may present an alternative technique.

Roux-en-Y Choledochojejunostomy is the method of choice for biliary reconstruction in liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis

BACKGROUND

Opinion is divided regarding the optimal method of biliary reconstruction after liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC).

METHODS

We investigated biliary complications and graft and patient survival in all patients who underwent liver transplantation for PSC in the United Kingdom between 1994 and 2003.

RESULTS

Anastomotic leak rates were similar, but a significantly higher stricture rate was observed in patients who had a duct-to-duct reconstruction compared with those who underwent a Roux-en-Y anastomosis. Graft and patient survival were also markedly worse in patients with a duct-to-duct anastomosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Roux-en-Y choledochojejunostomy is the method of choice for biliary reconstruction in liver transplantation for PSC.

Primary living-donor liver transplantation at the University of Chicago: technical aspects of the first 104 recipients

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of technical modifications on living-donor liver transplants in children since their introduction in 1989.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Although more than 4,000 liver transplants are performed every year in the United States, only approximately 500 are performed in children. Living-donor liver transplantation has helped to alleviate the organ shortage for small children in need of liver transplantation. Few centers have amassed a sufficient number of cases to evaluate the impact of the different techniques used in pediatric living-donor liver transplantation.

METHODS

From 1989 through 1997, 104 primary living-donor liver transplants were performed at the University of Chicago. Three phases of the living-donor liver transplant program can be defined based on the techniques of vascular reconstruction: phase 1, November 1989 to November 1994 (n = 78); phase 2, November 1994 to January 1996 (n = 6); and January 1996 to present (n = 20). The patients' charts were reviewed retrospectively. The incidence and type of vascular complications and patient and graft survival rates were analyzed.

RESULTS

Although the demographics of the patients have not changed during the three phases of the living-donor liver transplant program, the outcomes have improved. Without the use of conduits, the incidence of portal vein complications has significantly decreased from 44% to 8%. The incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis has decreased from 22% to 0% with the use of microvascular techniques. The combined use of both techniques has led to a significant increase in graft survival, from 74% to 94%.

CONCLUSIONS

The living-donor liver transplant recipient operation has undergone significant technical changes since its introduction in 1989. These changes have decreased the vascular complications associated with this type of graft. Avoiding the use of vascular conduits and performing microvascular hepatic artery anastomoses are the critical steps in improving graft survival.

Hepatobiliary manifestations of inflammatory bowel disease

PSC is the most common of the clinically significant hepatobiliary diseases seen in association with IBD, with an incidence that varies from 2.5% to 7.5%. Conversely, 50% to 75% of patients with PSC have IBD. This high degree of association suggests a common pathogenetic mechanism; however, no causal relationship has been established. The etiopathogenesis of PSC remains poorly understood, despite a large number of studies looking at differing hypotheses. The diagnosis is usually established by cholangiography. Liver biopsy can sometimes be helpful in diagnosing pericholangitis. There is a significant overlap of the histology with chronic hepatitis. Serum markers have been studied for diagnosing PSC, particularly for early diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma, but none have shown the high sensitivity and specificity needed to use them clinically. PSC usually progresses insidiously and eventually leads to cirrhosis. Despite progress in early recognition, optimal management of patients with PSC remains a challenge requiring a multidisciplinary approach among hepatologists, endoscopists, surgeons, and interventional radiologists. Colectomy for ulcerative colitis does not alter the natural history of PSC. There is a high (10% to 15%) incidence of cholangiocarcinoma in patients with PSC. This incidence along with the risk of colon cancer in patients with ulcerative colitis makes it necessary to follow these patients closely. A number of pharmacologic therapies have been evaluated, but none has proven successful in slowing the progression of PSC or prolonging survival. Endoscopic therapy has a proven utility in treating complications of recurrent cholangitis or worsening jaundice in the setting of a dominant stricture, but endoscopy has not been shown to improve survival or decrease the need for liver transplantation. Liver transplantation is life-saving for patients with advanced PSC. Pericholangitis, gallstones, and chronic hepatitis are additional disorders noted in association with IBD, but they are much less common and easier to manage than PSC.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis: a clinical review

Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a cholestatic liver disease characterized by fibro-obliterative inflammation of the entire biliary tree. It is a slowly progressive disease with an undulating course, resulting in terminal biliary cirrhosis after a median period of about 12 years after diagnosis. The etiology of the disease is unknown and there is no effective therapy that can halt disease progression. Around 8% of PSC patients develop cholangiocarcinoma, which, by the time it is diagnosed, cannot be treated curatively. The purpose of this article is to review the current knowledge about primary sclerosing cholangitis and to speculate on future strategies to address the issues of etiology and therapy.