Kidney graft weight as an important risk factor for long-term graft survival

Association of obesity and muscle mass with risk of albuminuria in renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Increased albuminuria is a predictor of graft loss in kidney graft recipients. It is unknown whether obesity is an independent risk factor for the development of increased albuminuria in this population. The aim of this study was to elucidate the association between obesity and albuminuria in renal transplant recipients.

METHODS

We enrolled 330 renal transplant recipients and prospectively collected demographic, anthropomorphic, clinical and laboratory variables susceptible to influence albumin excretion. The outcome was albuminuria, measured using accurately timed urine collections. Data from 201 patients were analyzed after exclusion of participants with missing data and patients enrolled less than 6 months since renal transplantation. Analysis was carried out for an early and a late period, defined according to the 2.4-year median follow-up time.

RESULTS

Body mass index (BMI), waist circumference and urinary creatinine excretion rate were independent predictors of albuminuria in the late post-transplant period, indicating that the predictive value of body mass index for albuminuria is related to both increased abdominal fat mass and increased muscle mass. BMI was an independent predictor of microalbuminuria. Waist circumference and urinary creatinine were independent predictors of microalbuminuria for values above certain cutoffs: 110% of the accepted thresholds defining abdominal obesity and 1500 mg/day, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These associations, which have not previously been reported, suggest, but do not prove, that an imbalance between metabolic demand and nephron mass may be responsible for increased albuminuria in the renal transplant population.

The impact of donor and recipient weight incompatibility on renal transplant outcomes

BACKGROUND

Donor/recipient size mismatching and correlation to allograft outcome remains poorly defined. This study assessed the impact of donor body weight (DBW) to recipient body weight (RBW) ratio on allograft function and survival.

METHODS

A total of 898 deceased donor renal transplant recipients were included in the study. Patients were divided into quartiles depending on the ratio of DBW/RBW: Q1 (≤ 0.88), Q2 (0.89-1.00), Q3 (1.01-1.22) and Q4 (> 1.22). Donor and recipient characteristics were obtained from the national kidney transplant service database. Serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 1 and 5 years after transplant were compared.

RESULTS

Q4 patients had a higher eGFR 1 year post-transplant (median 59.5 ml/min, IQR 46.8-76.2) compared to Q1-Q3 which had median eGFRs of 54.3, 54.8 and 55.3 ml/min, respectively (p < 0.001). At 5 years post-transplant, there were modest differences in the eGFR across the four quartiles, Q1-4 with median eGFRs of 56.9, 61.1, 61.2 and 58.6 ml/min, respectively (p = 0.02). However, there were no significant differences in 1- and 5-year allograft survival between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In the setting of deceased donor renal transplantation, mismatching of donor to recipient weight had no impact on 5-year allograft survival, but a low DBW/RBW ratio is modestly associated with lower eGFR.

Does donor kidney to recipient body weight ratio influence long-term outcomes of living-donor kidney transplantation?

This study evaluated the effect of the donor kidney to recipient body weight (Kw/Rw) ratio on long-term graft function and survival. We investigated retrospectively whether there was any association between Kw/Rw ratio and long-term graft survival and function after a follow-up of >10 years. We studied a consecutive series of 123 adult-to-adult living kidney transplants. According to the Kw/Rw ratio, patients were divided into 3 groups: "low" (Kw/Rw <2.85; n = 29), "medium" (2.85 ≤ Kw/Rw < 4.04; n = 63), and "high" (≥4.04; n = 31). Among the 3 groups, the mean serum creatinine levels at 1 and 6 months as well as 1 year after transplantation were significantly lower among patients with a high Kw/Rw ratio than in those with a medium or low ratio, but serum creatinine levels at 3 and 5 years did not differ significantly (P = .394 and 0.620, respectively). Graft survival rates at 5 and 10 years after transplantation were significantly lower in the "low" group. We observed a significant association between Kw/Rw ratio and graft survival (P = .018). The Kw/Rw ratio is an important factor for long-term graft survival and early graft function. However, it did not significantly affect subsequent renal function.

Graft volume as the surrogate marker for nephron number affects the outcomes of living-donor kidney transplantation

Post-transplant outcome of kidney allografts depends on various factors, one of which may be the compatibility in volume between graft and recipient. However, previous studies adjusted the graft volume only for recipient's size. As the adjusted graft volume for donor's size would be substituted of nephron number more accurately, we adjusted the graft volume for both recipient's and donor's sizes. In 351 cases of living-donor kidney transplantation, we found that the adjusted graft volume for both recipient's and donor's body surface areas (BSAs) yielded larger area under the curves for the transplant outcomes than looking only at the adjusted volume for the recipient's BSA. The recipients were separated into two groups according to the low and high adjusted graft volumes. During the follow-up period (mean 55.6 months), the low-graft-volume group conferred greater risk of rejection, chronic change, glomerulonephritis, and graft loss than the high-graft-volume group (all p's < 0.05). However, the frequency of T-cell infiltration, as evaluated in protocol biopsy, was not different between the two adjusted graft volume groups. In conclusion, the graft volume as the surrogate marker for nephron number should be considered in kidney transplantation, especially in otherwise similar donor conditions.

The effect of donor/recipient body surface area ratio on outcomes in pediatric kidney transplantation

In pediatric kidney transplantation, the effect of inadequate nephron dosing on graft survival remains undetermined. The aim of this study was to assess the use of D/R BSA, as a reliable indicator of adequate nephron dosing, and eventually a tool to optimize pediatric graft allocation. Following Institutional Review Board approval, we reviewed deceased donor pediatric kidney transplantation (N = 156). We divided patients into three groups, based on D/R BSA: A < or =0.8; B 0.81-1.19; C > or =1.2. Five-yr graft survival rates in the groups were: A 82.0%; B 94.9%; C 97.1% (p = 0.01). Group C had the lowest rate of acute rejection, suggesting a protective effect of increased D/R BSA (group A = 35.7%, group B = 38.9%, group C = 18.8%; p = 0.029). The logistic regression analysis showed that decreased D/R BSA ratio is a risk factor for loss of graft function, at one and five yr [i.e., group A OR 6 (95% CI 1.14-39.30, p = 0.015) and OR 4.49 (95% CI 1.46-13.79, p = 0.009), respectively]. We conclude that for pediatric recipients, D/R BSA is a valuable adjunct when determining long-term graft survival. Its utility may avoid an alloimmune-independent risk factor, increasing the long-term protective value of a good matching policy.

Does donor nephron mass have any impact on graft survival?

OBJECTIVES

Functioning nephron mass namely, the number of nephrons in the grafted kidney, is one of the nonimmunologic factors that may have some impact on long-term graft survival. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of donor nephron mass on graft outcome in the recipient.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1989 to 2005, 1000 renal transplants were performed at our center. The 217 studied cases were followed for an average of 8 years. All patients received grafts from living donors. The weight of the grafted kidney (donor nephron mass) as well as the recipient's body mass index (BMI) were measured at the time of operation. Nephron mass index (NMI) was defined as the ratio of donor nephron mass to recipient BMI. Associations between variables were tested by logistic regression and Pearson correlation using the SAS system and S-plus statistical software. To evaluate graft function, we determined serum creatinine values, acute rejection episodes and chronic nephropathy.

RESULTS

Mean NMI was 8.07 +/- 0.2 and mean creatinine level was 1.43 +/- 0.4 mg/dL. There were 32 cases (14.7%) of acute rejection, who were managed successfully with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) in 28 cases. Four patients lost their grafts. There were 15 cases (7%) of graft loss due to chronic rejection. Using Pearson correlation, we observed no association between NMI and mean serum creatinine level. Logistic regression showed a significant relation between NMI and acute rejection (P<.05) with an odds ratio of 2.0. There was no significant correlation between NMI and chronic rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

The lower the NMI, the greater the short-term graft loss. However, in the long term, no significant correlation was found between graft survival and NMI. Also, mean creatinine level was not significantly different among patients regardless of NMI.

Fractional creatinine clearance of the donated kidney using Cockcroft-Gault formula as a predictor of graft function after living donor transplantation

To prevent hyperfiltration of the renal allograft, it is important to initially provide adequate functioning nephrons to meet the metabolic demands of a recipient. During the preoperative evaluation of a potential kidney donor, it is necessary to estimate the renal function of donated kidney compared with the metabolic needs of the recipient. The functional ratio of each kidney was measured using technetium-99m diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid. The serum creatinine (Scr, mg/dL) and estimated creatinine clearance (Ccr, mL/min/1.73 m(2)) using the Cockcroft-Gault formula were measured and calculated in 82 donors. We excluded recipients who had an episode of rejection, and followed all recipients for more than 6 months posttransplantation. The average functional proportion of the donated kidney was 50.5% +/- 4.7% of the total Ccr 83.4 +/- 18.3 of donors. The Scr of recipients at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months posttransplantation were significantly (P < .05) correlated with the fractional Ccr of the donated kidney; however, Scr at 1 year was not correlated (P = .307). Furthermore, the Ccr of the recipient at 1, 3, and 6 months posttransplantation were significantly (P < .05) correlated with the fractional Ccr of the donated kidney; however, the Ccr at 9 months and 1 year were not correlated (P = .094 and .141, respectively). The Scr and Ccr of recipients within 6 months after transplantation may depend on the functional mass of the donated kidney, which should be estimated prior to kidney donation and compared with the metabolic demands of the potential recipient.

Metabolic demand and renal mass supply affecting the early graft function after living donor kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Graft mass has been demonstrated to be a determinant of outcome after kidney transplantation. An insufficient nephron might fail to meet the metabolic demands of the recipient and lead to hyperfiltration.

METHODS

The study population was restricted to live donor transplants demonstrating immediate function that had neither ischemic injury, episodes of rejection, nor any complications that resulted in a functional decrease of the graft. The donated kidney was weighed just after cold flush, and the recipient's serum creatinine (Scr) was measured on a daily basis postoperatively. When the recipient's Scr reached the baseline, the recipient's 24-hour urine was collected for the amount of proteinuria (Upr), creatinine excretion (Ucr), and creatinine clearance (Ccr) calculation. As the parameters of the metabolic demands of donor and recipient, body weight, height, body surface area, lean body weight, and body mass index were noted. Pearson correlation and linear regression were carried out.

RESULTS

The graft function, as measured by Scr, Ucr, and Upr, was not directly correlated with the graft weight but rather correlated with the ratios of graft weight to the parameters of recipient's metabolic demands. As recipient size increased, the metabolic demand has increased. The parameters of recipient's metabolic demands were directly correlated with Scr and Ucr, rather than with Upr.

CONCLUSION

During living donor and recipient matching, both the potential sizes of the donated kidney and the recipient should be considered in terms of the early graft function after transplantation.

Impact of Graft Mass on the Clinical Outcome of Kidney Transplants

The effect of nephronic mass reduction of kidney transplants has not been analyzed specifically in a large cohort. Transplant injuries in cadaver kidney graft may have led to an underestimation of the magnitude of this factor. The aim of this study was to analyze the consequences of kidney mass reduction on transplantation outcome. The weights of 1142 kidney grafts were collected prospectively immediately before grafting. Donors and recipients <15 yr of age, simultaneous kidney/pancreas grafts, and technical failures before day 7 were excluded from the analysis. The analysis was performed on Cockroft-calculated creatinine clearance and proteinuria in 964 patients for whom all of the necessary information was available. This study reports that the smallest kidneys transplanted into the largest recipients (donor kidney weight/recipient body weight [DKW/RBW] <2 g/kg, n = 88) increased their clearance by 2.38 ml/min every month for 6 mo (P < 0.0001) and by 0.27 ml/min thereafter (P < 0.0001). Conversely, creatinine clearance did not change for the largest kidneys transplanted into the smallest recipients (DKW/RBW ratios >/=4 g/kg). Next, using a Cox model analysis, it was shown that the risk of having a proteinuria >0.5 g/kg was significantly increased for the low DKW/RBW ratios <2 g/kg with 50% of patients having a proteinuria, compared with DKW/RBW ratios >/=4 g/kg (P < 0.001). In cadaver transplant recipients, graft mass has a rapid impact on graft filtration rate and proteinuria. Avoiding major kidney/recipient inadequacy should have a significant influence on long-term transplant function.

Inadequate donor size in cadaver kidney transplantation

There have been conflicting reports that kidneys from small donors may be at increased risk for late graft failure if they are transplanted into large recipients. Data from the United States Renal Data System was used to study all first cadaver kidney transplantations performed during the years 1994 to 1999. Donor and recipient body surface area (BSA) combinations were included along with other patient and transplant characteristics in a Poisson analysis of factors associated with early (in the first 4 mo) and late (> or =4 mo) graft failure. The numbers of large (BSA >2.2 m(2)) and medium size (BSA 1.6 to 2.2 m(2)) recipients that received kidneys from small (BSA <1.6 m(2)) donors are less than expected (chi(2) = 118.09; P < 0.0001), suggesting that transplant centers may be refusing some kidneys on the basis of donor-recipient size differences. Large recipients who received kidneys from small donors made up 1.5% of the population and had a 43% (95% CI, 17 to 75%; P = 0.0004) increased risk of late graft failure compared with medium-size recipients who received kidneys from medium-size donors (53.4% of the population). Medium-size recipients who received kidneys from small donors made up 12.0% of the population and had a 16% (95% CI, 6 to 26%; P = 0.0012) increased risk of late graft failure. Disparities in recipient and donor size had similar adverse affects on mortality. Effects of recipient obesity (body mass index) and donor gender on late graft survival were no longer statistically significant after the effects of donor and recipient body size were taken into account. In conclusion, the relative size of the donor and recipient should possibly be taken into account when choosing kidneys for transplantation.