Detailed analysis of cell profiles in peripheral blood, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, and transbronchial biopsy specimens during acute rejection and CMV infection in lung and heart-lung allograft recipients

Acute Rejection in the Modern Lung Transplant Era

Acute cellular rejection (ACR) remains a common complication after lung transplantation. Mortality directly related to ACR is low and most patients respond to first-line immunosuppressive treatment. However, a subset of patients may develop refractory or recurrent ACR leading to an accelerated lung function decline and ultimately chronic lung allograft dysfunction. Infectious complications associated with the intensification of immunosuppression can also negatively impact long-term survival. In this review, we summarize the most recent evidence on the mechanisms, risk factors, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of ACR. We specifically focus on novel, promising biomarkers which are under investigation for their potential to improve the diagnostic performance of transbronchial biopsies. Finally, for each topic, we highlight current gaps in knowledge and areas for future research.

Chronic Lung Allograft Dysfunction: Review of CT and Pathologic Findings

Chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) is the most common cause of mortality in lung transplant recipients after the 1st year of transplantation. CLAD has traditionally been classified into two distinct obstructive and restrictive forms: bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and restrictive allograft syndrome. However, CLAD may manifest with a spectrum of imaging and pathologic findings and a combination of obstructive and restrictive physiologic abnormalities. Although the initial CT manifestations of CLAD may be nonspecific, the progression of findings at follow-up should signal the possibility of CLAD and may be present on imaging studies prior to the development of functional abnormalities of the lung allograft. This review encompasses the evolution of CT findings in CLAD, with emphasis on the underlying pathogenesis and pathologic condition, to enhance understanding of imaging findings. The purpose of this article is to familiarize the radiologist with the initial and follow-up CT findings of the obstructive, restrictive, and mixed forms of CLAD, for which early diagnosis and treatment may result in improved survival. Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2021.

Surveillance Bronchoscopy for the Care of Lung Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Single Center Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Lung transplantation is often the only treatment for end-stage lung disease. Following lung transplantation, infections and transplant rejections are major obstacles to short- and long-term success. Therefore, close monitoring for these complications is required after lung transplantation. The role of prescheduled surveillance bronchoscopies after lung transplantation is controversial. Thus, we aimed to retrospectively analyze the therapeutic implications of surveillance bronchoscopies in 110 consecutive lung transplant recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Results of 400 prescheduled surveillance bronchoscopies of 110 consecutive lung transplant recipients were analyzed. Positive results (pathologic histology, microbiology, or virology) were further investigated for their effect on clinical decision making. Additionally, cellular composition of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was analyzed.

RESULTS

Two hundred five surveillance bronchoscopies showed pathologic findings. In 81 cases clinical treatment was changed based on the results. That is, 20% of all prescheduled bronchoscopies directly influenced clinical decision making. Furthermore, analyses of BAL indicate that increased alveolar eosinophils are associated with an increased risk of transplant rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

Prescheduled surveillance bronchoscopies identify clinically unsuspected but therapeutically relevant pathologic findings in approximately 20% of cases. BAL cell composition may confer additional information, especially in cases when biopsy is not possible.

Surveillance for acute cellular rejection after lung transplantation

Acute cellular rejection (ACR) is a common complication following lung transplantation (LTx), affecting almost a third of recipients in the first year. Established, comprehensive diagnostic criteria exist but they necessitate allograft biopsies which in turn increases clinical risk and can pose certain logistical and economic problems in service delivery. Undermining these challenges further, are known problems with inter-observer interpretation of biopsies and uncertainty as to the long-term implications of milder or indeed asymptomatic episodes. Increased risk of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) has long been considered the most significant consequence of ACR. Consensus is lacking as to whether this applies to mild ACR, with contradictory evidence available. Given these issues, research into alternative, minimal or non-invasive biomarkers represents the main focus of research in ACR. A number of potential markers have been proposed, but none to date have demonstrated adequate sensitivity and specificity to allow translation from bench to bedside.

Diagnostic value of plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage samples in acute lung allograft rejection: differential cytology

Diagnosis of acute lung allograft rejection is currently based on transbronchial lung biopsies. Additional methods to detect acute allograft dysfunction derived from plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage samples might facilitate diagnosis and ultimately improve allograft survival. This review article gives an overview of the cell profiles of bronchoalveolar lavage and plasma samples during acute lung allograft rejection. The value of these cells and changes within the pattern of differential cytology to support the diagnosis of acute lung allograft rejection is discussed. Current findings on the topic are highlighted and trends for future research are identified.

Novel insights into lung transplant rejection by microarray analysis

Gene expression microarrays can estimate the prevalence of mRNA for thousands of genes in a small sample of cells or tissue. Organ transplant researchers are increasingly using microarrays to identify specific patterns of gene expression that predict and characterize acute and chronic rejection, and to improve our understanding of the mechanisms underlying organ allograft dysfunction. We used microarrays to assess gene expression in bronchoalveolar lavage cell samples from lung transplant recipients with and without acute rejection on simultaneous lung biopsies. These studies showed increased expression during acute rejection of genes involved in inflammation, apoptosis, and T-cell activation and proliferation. We also studied gene expression during the evolution of airway obliteration in a murine heterotopic tracheal transplant model of chronic rejection. These studies demonstrated specific patterns of gene expression at defined time points after transplantation in allografts, whereas gene expression in isografts reverted back to that of native tracheas within 2 wk after transplantation. These studies demonstrate the potential power of microarrays to identify biomarkers of acute and chronic lung rejection. The application of new genetic, genomic, and proteomic technologies is in its infancy, and the microarray-based studies described here are clearly only the beginning of their application to lung transplantation. The massive amount of data generated per tissue or cell sample has spawned an outpouring of invention in the bioinformatics field, which is developing methodologies to turn data into meaningful and reproducible clinical and mechanistic inferences.