Rejection rate and incidence of acute tubular necrosis after pulsatile perfusion preservation

Hypothermic machine perfusion is superior to static cold storage in deceased donor kidney transplantation: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There remains a lack of consensus on the optimal storage method for deceased donor kidneys. This meta-analysis compares storage with hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) vs traditional static cold storage (SCS).

METHODS

The Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialised Register was searched to identify (quasi-) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to include in our meta-analysis. PRISMA guidelines were used to perform and write this review.

RESULTS

There is high-certainty evidence that HMP reduces the risk of delayed graft function (DGF) when compared to SCS (2138 participants from 14 studies, RR = 0.77; 0.67-0.90, P = .0006). This benefit is significant in both donation following circulatory death (DCD; 772 patients from seven studies, RR = 0.75; 0.64-0.87, P = .0002) and donation following brainstem death (DBD) grafts (971 patients from four studies, RR = 0.78; 0.65-0.93, P = .006). The number of perfusions required to prevent one episode of DGF was 7.26 and 13.60 in DCD and DBD grafts, respectively. There is strong evidence that HMP also improves graft survival in both DBD and DCD grafts, at both 1 and 3 years. Economic analyses suggest HMP is cost-saving at 1 year compared with SCS.

CONCLUSION

Hypothermic machine perfusion is superior to SCS in deceased donor renal transplantation. Direct comparisons with normothermic machine perfusion in RCTs are essential to identify optimal preservation methods in kidney transplantation.

Machine perfusion preservation versus static cold storage for deceased donor kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment for end-stage kidney disease. Retrieval, transport and transplant of kidney grafts causes ischaemia reperfusion injury. The current accepted standard is static cold storage (SCS) whereby the kidney is stored on ice after removal from the donor and then removed from the ice box at the time of implantation. However, technology is now available to perfuse or "pump" the kidney during the transport phase or at the recipient centre. This can be done at a variety of temperatures and using different perfusates. The effectiveness of treatment is manifest clinically as delayed graft function (DGF), whereby the kidney fails to produce urine immediately after transplant.

OBJECTIVES

To compare hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) and (sub)normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) with standard SCS.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies to 18 October 2018 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing HMP/NMP versus SCS for deceased donor kidney transplantation were eligible for inclusion. All donor types were included (donor after circulatory (DCD) and brainstem death (DBD), standard and extended/expanded criteria donors). Both paired and unpaired studies were eligible for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The results of the literature search were screened and a standard data extraction form was used to collect data. Both of these steps were performed by two independent authors. Dichotomous outcome results were expressed as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Continuous scales of measurement were expressed as a mean difference (MD). Random effects models were used for data analysis. The primary outcome was incidence of DGF. Secondary outcomes included: one-year graft survival, incidence of primary non-function (PNF), DGF duration, long term graft survival, economic implications, graft function, patient survival and incidence of acute rejection.

MAIN RESULTS

No studies reported on NMP, however one ongoing study was identified.Sixteen studies (2266 participants) comparing HMP with SCS were included; 15 studies could be meta-analysed. Fourteen studies reported on requirement for dialysis in the first week post-transplant (DGF incidence); there is high-certainty evidence that HMP reduces the risk of DGF when compared to SCS (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.67 to 0.90; P = 0.0006). HMP reduces the risk of DGF in kidneys from DCD donors (7 studies, 772 participants: RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.87; P = 0.0002; high certainty evidence), as well as kidneys from DBD donors (4 studies, 971 participants: RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.93; P = 0.006; high certainty evidence). The number of perfusions required to prevent one episode of DGF (number needed to treat, NNT) was 7.26 and 13.60 in DCD and DBD kidneys respectively. Studies performed in the last decade all used the LifePort machine and confirmed that HMP reduces the incidence of DGF in the modern era (5 studies, 1355 participants: RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.91; P = 0.002; high certainty evidence). Reports of economic analysis suggest that HMP can lead to cost savings in both the North American and European settings.Two studies reported HMP also improves graft survival however we were not able to meta-analyse these results. A reduction in incidence of PNF could not be demonstrated. The effect of HMP on our other outcomes (incidence of acute rejection, patient survival, hospital stay, long-term graft function, duration of DGF) remains uncertain.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

HMP is superior to SCS in deceased donor kidney transplantation. This is true for both DBD and DCD kidneys, and remains true in the modern era (studies performed in the last decade). As kidneys from DCD donors have a higher overall DGF rate, fewer perfusions are needed to prevent one episode of DGF (7.26 versus 13.60 in DBD kidneys).Further studies looking solely at the impact of HMP on DGF incidence are not required. Follow-up reports detailing long-term graft survival from participants of the studies already included in this review would be an efficient way to generate further long-term graft survival data.Economic analysis, based on the results of this review, would help cement HMP as the standard preservation method in deceased donor kidney transplantation.RCTs investigating (sub)NMP are required.

Maximizing kidneys for transplantation using machine perfusion: from the past to the future: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The two main options for renal allograft preservation are static cold storage (CS) and machine perfusion (MP). There has been considerably increased interest in MP preservation of kidneys, however conflicting evidence regarding its efficacy and associated costs have impacted its scale of clinical uptake. Additionally, there is no clear consensus regarding oxygenation, and hypo- or normothermia, in conjunction with MP, and its mechanisms of action are also debated. The primary aims of this article were to elucidate the benefits of MP preservation with and without oxygenation, and/or under normothermic conditions, when compared with CS prior to deceased donor kidney transplantation.

METHODS

Clinical (observational studies and prospective trials) and animal (experimental) articles exploring the use of renal MP were assessed (EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane databases). Meta-analyses were conducted for the comparisons between hypothermic MP (hypothermic machine perfusion [HMP]) and CS (human studies) and normothermic MP (warm (normothermic) perfusion [WP]) compared with CS or HMP (animal studies). The primary outcome was allograft function. Secondary outcomes included graft and patient survival, acute rejection and parameters of tubular, glomerular and endothelial function. Subgroup analyses were conducted in expanded criteria (ECD) and donation after circulatory (DCD) death donors.

RESULTS

A total of 101 studies (63 human and 38 animal) were included. There was a lower rate of delayed graft function in recipients with HMP donor grafts compared with CS kidneys (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.69-0.87). Primary nonfunction (PNF) was reduced in ECD kidneys preserved by HMP (RR 0.28; 95% CI 0.09-0.89). Renal function in animal studies was significantly better in WP kidneys compared with both HMP (standardized mean difference [SMD] of peak creatinine 1.66; 95% CI 3.19 to 0.14) and CS (SMD of peak creatinine 1.72; 95% CI 3.09 to 0.34). MP improves renal preservation through the better maintenance of tubular, glomerular, and endothelial function and integrity.

CONCLUSIONS

HMP improves short-term outcomes after renal transplantation, with a less clear effect in the longer-term. There is considerable room for modification of the process to assess whether superior outcomes can be achieved through oxygenation, perfusion fluid manipulation, and alteration of perfusion temperature. In particular, correlative experimental (animal) data provides strong support for more clinical trials investigating normothermic MP.

Hypothermic machine perfusion of kidneys retrieved from standard and high-risk donors

Hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) of kidneys is a long-established alternative to static cold storage and has been suggested to be a better preservation method. Today, as our deceased donor profile continues to change towards higher-risk kidneys of lower quality, we are confronted with the limits of cold storage. Interest in HMP as a preservation technique is on the rise. Furthermore, HMP also creates a window of opportunity during which to assess the viability and quality of the graft before transplantation. The technology might also provide a platform during which the graft could be actively repaired, making it particularly attractive for higher-risk kidneys. We review the current evidence on HMP in kidney transplantation and provide an outlook for the use of the technology in the years to come.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of hypothermic machine perfusion versus static cold storage of kidney allografts on transplant outcomes

BACKGROUND

Adequate preservation of renal allografts for transplantation is important for maintaining and improving transplant outcomes. There are two prevalent methods: hypothermic machine perfusion and static cold storage. The preferred method of storage, however, remains controversial. The objective was to review systematically the evidence comparing outcomes from these two modalities.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, the Transplant Library and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. The final date for searches was 30 November 2012. Studies were assessed for methodological quality. Summary effects were calculated as relative risk (RR) with 95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.). Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs were included, but evaluated separately. Results from RCTs alone were used for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria, including seven RCTs (1475 kidneys) and 11 non-RCTs (728 kidneys). The overall risk of delayed graft function was lower with hypothermic machine perfusion than static cold storage (RR 0·81, 95 per cent c.i. 0·71 to 0·92; P = 0·002). There was no difference in the rate of primary non-function (RR 1·15, 0·46 to 2·90; P = 0·767). There was a faster initial fall in the level of serum creatinine with hypothermic machine perfusion in two RCTs, but not in another. There was no relationship between rates of acute rejection or patient survival and the method of preservation.

CONCLUSION

Data from the included studies suggest that hypothermic machine perfusion reduces delayed graft function compared with static cold storage. There was no difference in primary non-function, acute rejection, long-term renal function or patient survival. A difference in renal graft survival is uncertain.

Perfusion storage reduces apoptosis in a porcine kidney model of donation after cardiac death

BACKGROUND

Donation after cardiac death (DCD) kidneys suffer a high incidence of delayed graft function attributable to warm ischemia and cold ischemia (CI). Neither the mechanism of injury nor type of cell death has been described. Clinical studies suggest that perfusion storage (PS) of DCD kidneys may reduce injury although the mechanism of protection is unknown. In a porcine model of DCD, we hypothesized that DCD kidneys have increased caspase-1 due to warm ischemia (WI) and increased caspase-3 and apoptosis due to CI.

METHODS

Male Yorkshire pigs subjected to cardiac death were perfused with cold University of Wisconsin solution. The perfused kidneys were removed and stored in cold University of Wisconsin solution for 24 hr. Kidney biopsies were obtained before cardiac death and at 0 and 24 hr of CI.

RESULTS

There was an increase in caspase-1 activity due to WI before cold preservation. CI was associated with a massive increase in apoptosis, caspase-3/7 activity, and caspase-3 protein expression. Next, we hypothesized that PS would protect against apoptosis. We compared DCD kidneys subjected to static versus PS for 24 hr. PS significantly reduced proximal tubular apoptosis and was associated with increased B-cell lymphoma-extra large, and hypoxia-inducible transcription factor-1α.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that in DCD kidneys, WI preferentially activates caspase-1, whereas CI activates caspase-3 and causes apoptosis. PS may protect DCD kidneys through activation of antiapoptotic pathways involving B-cell lymphoma-extra large and hypoxia-inducible transcription factor-1α.

Machine perfusion preservation improves renal allograft survival

Machine perfusion (MP) has been used as the kidney preservation method in our center for over 10 years. The first, small (n = 74) prospective, single-blinded randomized study comparing MP and Cold Storage (CS) showed that the incidence of delayed graft function was higher after CS. There have been no reports in the literature on the effect of storage modality on long-term function of renal allografts. This paper presents an analysis of long-term results of renal transplantation in 415 patients operated on between 1994 and 1999. Of those, 227 kidneys were MP-stored prior to KTx. The control group consisted of 188 CS kidney transplants. Kidneys were not randomized to MP or to CS. Donor demographics, medical and biochemical data, cold ischemia time, HLA match and recipient data were collected. Standard triple-drug immunosuppression was administered to both groups. Mortality, graft survival and incidence of return to hemodialysis treatment were analyzed. Despite longer cold ischemia time and poorer donor hemodynamics in MP group, 5-year Kaplan-Meier graft survival was better in MP-stored than in CS-stored kidneys (68.2% vs. 54.2%, p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

In this nonrandomized analysis, kidney storage by MP improved graft survival and reduced the number of patients who returned to dialysis.

The Influence of Pulsatile Preservation in Kidney Transplantation From Non–Heart-Beating Donors

Continuous hypothermic pulsatile perfusion (CHPP) may offer improved early function compared with cold static perfusion (CSP) for heart-beating cadaveric donors. With an expanding pool of donors, ie, non-heart-beating donors (NHBD), we present our preliminary results with the use of CHPP compared with CSP to preserve kidney grafts retrieved from NHBD. Eighteen consecutive locally procured cadaveric kidneys from NHBD were preserved using CHPP using UW machine perfusion solution in the Life Port kidney transporter. Perfusion parameters were measured serially during pulsatile perfusion. This group was compared with 18 NHBD cadaveric kidneys preserved with CSP. No organs were lost due to faulty technique of preparation or preparation of pulsatile perfusion. Immediate renal function was observed in 13 cases (72.2%). In CSP in NHBD, we had 16 cases with delayed graft function (88.8%). These early results show that the use of pulsatile perfusion to preserve kidneys from NHBD may be associated with improved early outcomes. Longer follow-up is required to answer the more important question as to whether it offers long-term improvements that justify the extra cost and complexity.

Graft function after kidney transplantation from non-heartbeating donors according to maastricht category

PURPOSE

Donor shortages have led to some groups using alternative sources such as non-heartbeating donors (NHBDs). Kidneys from NHBDs suffer from warm ischemia at cardiac arrest which is reflected by acute tubular necrosis of the allograft, resulting in a period of delayed graft function. NHBDs are categorized by the circumstances surrounding the agonal events of death which reflect differences in the likelihood of ischemic injury to the kidney. In this study we determined the impact of ischemic injury on the renal function of kidneys procured from different categories of NHBDs.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1998 to 2003, 144 kidneys were procured from 72 NHBDs resulting in 93 transplants characterized into Maastricht categories II, III and IV NHBD renal transplants. Renal function after transplant was evaluated from the last dialysis until discharge from hospital, and then at 3 monthly intervals thereafter.

RESULTS

Primary warm ischemic time is more prolonged in the uncontrolled donor (category II) than controlled donor (category III greater than IV). Delayed graft function occurs more frequently (Maastricht category II 83.8%, III 67.4% and IV 0%, ANOVA p <0.05) and the return to normal function is more prolonged in uncontrolled donors. This is illustrated by the greater incidence of acute tubular necrosis (Maastricht category II 81.1%, III 65.2% and IV 50.0%, ANOVA p = nonsignificant) in the kidney allograft. There was no difference in year 1 allograft survival (Maastricht category II 83.9%, III 92.5% and IV 100%, ANOVA p = nonsignificant).

CONCLUSIONS

Early graft function is poorest in kidneys derived from Maastricht category II donors and best in category IV with III in-between. However, after 3 months the function of kidneys from all donors is the same.

Pulsatile machine perfusion vs. cold storage of kidneys for transplantation: a rapid and systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To identify and prioritize key areas for further research in kidney preservation systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of machine perfusion and cold storage techniques in reducing delayed graft function (DGF) and improving graft survival in recipients of kidneys from beating and non-heart-beating donors. Literature quantifying the link between DGF and graft survival was used to evaluate the potential long-term impact of machine perfusion and cold storage systems. Cox proportional hazards modelling was used to predict graft survival and graft years gained over 10 yr. Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis was conducted to evaluate stochastic uncertainties within the model.

RESULTS

Machine perfusion leads to a relative risk of DGF of approximately 80% (67%, 96%) compared with cold storage, although the evidence base is limited in quality and study size. Direct evidence on graft survival at 1 yr demonstrates no statistically significant difference between machine perfusion and cold storage. Predictions based upon quantifying the link between DGF and graft survival suggest potential improvements of between 0 and 6% at 10 yr.

DISCUSSION

Studies of high methodological quality and sufficient size are required to determine whether machine preservation leads to reduce rates of DGF. Predicted impact on graft survival implies that direct evidence would require a large population followed up over a long period of time. Registry database analysis supported by validation of the link between DGF and graft survival may be preferable and more feasible than randomized controlled trials.