Predictive value of the CD45RO positive T-helper lymphocyte subset for acute cellular rejection during the early phase after kidney transplantation

MCP-1: chemoattractant with a role beyond immunity: a review

BACKGROUND

Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein (MCP)-1, a potent monocyte attractant, is a member of the CC chemokine subfamily. MCP-1 exerts its effects through binding to G-protein-coupled receptors on the surface of leukocytes targeted for activation and migration. Role of MCP-1 and its receptor CCR2 in monocyte recruitment during infection or under other inflammatory conditions is well known.

METHOD

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from the websites of the National Library of Medicine (http://www.ncbl.nlm.nih.gov) and Pubmed Central, the US National Library of Medicine's digital archive of life sciences literature (http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/). The data was assessed from books and journals that published relevant articles in this field.

RESULT

Recent and ongoing research indicates the role of MCP-1 in various allergic conditions, immunodeficiency diseases, bone remodelling, and permeability of blood - brain barrier, atherosclerosis, nephropathies and tumors.

CONCLUSION

MCP-1 plays an important role in pathogenesis of various disease states and hence MCP-1 inhibition may have beneficial effects in such conditions.

Differential regulation of chemokine CCL5 expression in monocytes/macrophages and renal cells by Y-box protein-1

The Y-box protein-1 (YB-1) belongs to the family of cold shock proteins that have pleiotropic functions such as gene transcription, RNA splicing, and mRNA translation. YB-1 has a critical role in atherogenesis due to its regulatory effects on chemokine CCL5 (RANTES) gene transcription in vascular smooth muscle cells. Since CCL5 is a key mediator of kidney transplant rejection, we determined whether YB-1 is involved in allograft rejection by manipulating its expression. In human kidney biopsies, YB-1 transcripts were amplified 17-fold in acute and 21-fold in chronic allograft rejection with a close correlation between CCL5 and YB-1 mRNA expression in both conditions. Among three possible YB-1 binding sites in the CCL5 promoter, a critical element was mapped at -28/-10 bps. This site allowed up-regulation of CCL5 transcription in monocytic THP-1 and HUT78 T-cells and in human primary monocytes; however, it repressed transcription in differentiated macrophages. Conversely, YB-1 knockdown led to decreased CCL5 transcription and secretion in monocytic cells. We show that YB-1 is a cell-type specific regulator of CCL5 expression in infiltrating T-cells and monocytes/macrophages and acts as an adaptive controller of inflammation during kidney allograft rejection.

CXCR3 and CCR5 positive T-cell recruitment in acute human renal allograft rejection

BACKGROUND

Experimental studies suggest that the infiltration of activated T cells into the allograft, the key event in the development of acute renal allograft rejection, depends on the expression of chemokines and their interaction with chemokine receptors expressed on T cells.

METHODS

For a more detailed comprehension of the pathogenesis of T-cell recruitment in human acute rejection, the in situ expression of chemokines and chemokine receptors in allografts of 26 patients between day 3 and 9 after renal transplantation was examined in the present prospective study.

RESULTS

Immunohistochemical staining showed a significantly increased number of CXCR3 (P<0.01) and CCR5 positive T cells (P<0.01) in the tubulointerstitium of patients with acute allograft rejection according to Banff grade Ia-IIb. Likewise the intrarenal RNA expression of the CXCR3 ligands IP-10 (5.2-fold) and I-TAC (7.2-fold) and the CCR5 ligand RANTES (5.7-fold), was significantly up-regulated in rejecting organs. In situ hybridization revealed that IP-10 but not I-TAC was predominantly expressed by infiltrating leukocytes in the tubulointerstitial area, co-localizing with CXCR3 positive T cells. To a lesser degree expression by tubular cells could be detected, providing a possible explanation for the increased urinary IP-10 excretion we found in patients with rejecting organs.

CONCLUSIONS

These data from a prospective, biopsy-controlled study indicate that the local expression of IP-10 and RANTES leads to the directional movement of activated CXCR3 and CCR5 bearing T cells into the renal allograft and mediates acute rejection. Our data provide a rationale that blocking CXCR3 and CCR5 may offer a unique therapeutic approach to prevent episodes of acute rejection in the early phase after renal transplantation.