Donor origin of neuroendocrine carcinoma in 2 transplant patients determined by molecular cytogenetics

Short Tandem Repeat Analysis in a Living Related Donor Adult Renal Transplant Recipient with Rare Natural Chimerism

After renal transplant, immunosuppression therapy is used to reduce the risk of rejection. Here, we describe the case of an adult living related donor renal transplant recipient with rare natural chimerism, as discovered by short tandem repeat sequence analysis. In our process of matching transplant patients, we perform human leukocyte antigen testing and short tandem repeat chimerism testing to decide postoperative immunosuppression strategy for transplant patients. We analyzed the short tandem repeat chimerism status before renal transplant and determined that this patient represented a rare case of natural chimerism. Assessment of organ recipient chimerism can inform physicians regarding a dosage reduction of immunosuppressive agents. Short tandem repeat sequence analysis provides substantial information regarding existing polymorphisms and can identify chimerism, if present, and thereby guide immunosuppression strategies after renal transplant, which may improve the long-term immunosuppression-free survival of renal transplant recipients.

Liver re-transplantation for donor-derived neuroendocrine tumor: A case report

BACKGROUND

Donor-origin cancer is a well-recognized but rare complication after liver transplantation (LT). The rise in the use of extended criteria donors due to the current shortage of organs increases the risk. Data on donor-origin neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) and the most appropriate treatment are scarce. Here, we report a case of a patient who developed a NEN confined to the liver after LT and was treated with liver re-transplantation (re-LT).

CASE SUMMARY

A 49-year-old man with no other medical co-morbidities underwent LT in 2013 for alcoholic liver cirrhosis. The donor was a 73-year-old female with no known malignancies. Early after LT, a hypoechogenic (15 mm) lesion was detected in the left hepatic lobe on abdominal ultrasound. The lesion was stable for next 11 mo, when abdominal magnetic resonance identified two hypovascular lesions (20 and 11 mm) with atypical enhancement pattern. Follow-up abdominal ultrasound revealed no new lesions for the next 2.5 years, when magnetic resonance showed a progression in size and number of lesions, also confirmed by abdominal computed tomography. Liver biopsy proved a well-differentiated NEN. Genetic analysis of the NEN confirmed donor origin of the neoplasm. As NEN was confined to liver graft only, in 2018, the patient underwent his second LT. At 12 mo after re-LT the patient is well with no signs of NEN dissemination.

CONCLUSION

The benefits of graft explantation should be weighed against the risks of re-LT and the likelihood of NEN dissemination beyond the graft.

Tumor reductive therapies and antitumor immunity

Tumor reductive therapy is to reduce tumor burden through direct killing of tumor cells. So far, there is no report on the connection between antitumor immunity and tumor reductive therapies. In the last few years, a new category of cancer treatment, immunotherapy, emerged and they are categorized separately from classic cytotoxic treatments (chemo and radiation therapy). The most prominent examples include cellular therapies (LAK and CAR-T) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD-1 and CTLA-4). Recent advances in clinical immunotherapy and our understanding of the mechanism behind them revealed that these therapies have a closer relationship with classic cancer treatments than we thought. In many cases, the effectiveness of classic therapies is heavily influenced by the status of the underlying antitumor-immunity. On the other hand, immunotherapies have shown better outcome when combined with tumor reductive therapies, not only due to the combined effects of tumor killing by each therapy but also because of a synergy between the two. Many clinical observations can be explained once we start to look at these classic therapies from an immunity standpoint. We have seen their direct effect on tumor antigen in vivo that they impact antitumor immunity more than we have realized. In turn, antitumor immunity contributes to tumor control and destruction as well. This review will take the immunological view of the classic therapies and summarize historical as well as recent findings in animal and clinical studies to make the argument that most of the cancer treatments exert their ultimate efficacy through antitumor immunity.

Donor-Derived Hepatic Neuroendocrine Tumor: Pause Before Proceeding With Liver Retransplantation

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are rare but the age-adjusted incidence in the United States has increased, possibly due to improved radiographic and endoscopic detection. In advanced NET, hepatic metastases are common. Orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) is currently considered an acceptable therapy for selected patients with limited hepatic disease or liver metastases where complete resection is thought to have curative intent. The development of NET of donor origin is very uncommon after organ transplant, and it is unclear if the same treatment strategies applied to hepatic NET would also be efficacious after OLT. Here, we describe a unique case of an OLT recipient with a donor-derived NET that was treated with redo OLT as the primary therapy. The donor-derived NET recurred in the recipient's second liver allograft suggesting an extrahepatic reservoir. This case describes the natural history of such a rare event. Here, we highlight the treatment options for hepatic NET and challenge the role of OLT for a donor-derived hepatic NET.

A symptomatic de novo pheochromocytoma 23 years after liver transplantation: a case report and review of the literature

We report a case of subacute onset of headaches and tremors with a newly discovered adrenal pheochromocytoma 23 years after an orthotopic liver transplantation and provide a review of the scarce literature regarding endocrine malignancies in liver transplant recipients. We describe the clinical presentation, diagnostic work-up, and management. This is the second case report in the literature of a de novo pheochromocytoma after solid organ transplantation. It shows that new-onset common symptoms in transplant recipients are always challenging and deserve a very thorough work-up until the cause of the symptoms is elucidated. A broad differential diagnosis should always be included in the study of any abnormalities in this patient population.

Donor transmitted and de novo cancer after liver transplantation

Cancers in solid organ recipients may be classified as donor transmitted, donor derived, de novo or recurrent. The risk of donor-transmitted cancer is very low and can be reduced by careful screening of the donor but cannot be abolished and, in the United Kingdom series is less than 0.03%. For donors with a known history of cancer, the risks will depend on the nature of the cancer, the interventions given and the interval between diagnosis and organ donation. The risks of cancer transmission must be balanced against the risks of death awaiting a new graft and strict adherence to current guidelines may result increased patient death. Organs from selected patients, even with high-grade central nervous system (CNS) malignancy and after a shunt, can, in some circumstances, be considered. Of potential donors with non-CNS cancers, whether organs may be safely used again depends on the nature of the cancer, the treatment and interval. Data are scarce about the most appropriate treatment when donor transmitted cancer is diagnosed: sometimes substitution of agents and reduction of the immunosuppressive load may be adequate and the impact of graft removal should be considered but not always indicated. Liver allograft recipients are at increased risk of some de novo cancers, especially those grafted for alcohol-related liver disease and hepatitis C virus infection. The risk of lymphoproliferative disease and cancers of the skin, upper airway and bowel are increased but not breast. Recipients should be advised to avoid risk behavior and monitored appropriately.

Transmission of clear cell tumor in a graft liver from cadaveric donor: case report

Neoplasms in children after organ transplantation are related to the type and intensity of immunosuppression and the donor-recipient serostatus, especially in relation to the Epstein-Barr virus. The patient was a two-yr-old female child with biliary atresia who underwent a liver transplantation from a female cadaver donor. Two adults received kidney transplants from the same donor. Nine months after transplantation, one of the adult recipients developed an urothelial tumor in the kidney graft. Imaging tests were repeated monthly in the liver-transplanted child and revealed no abnormalities. However, one yr and two months after the transplantation, the patient developed episodes of fever. At that time, imaging and liver biopsy showed a clear cell tumor of urothelial origin in the graft and the disease was limited to the liver. The patient underwent liver retransplantation, and she is currently free of tumor recurrence. Although rare, the occurrence of tumors in the post-transplant period from cadaver donors, without previously diagnosed tumors, is one of the many problems encountered in the complex world of organ transplantation.

Retransplantation for donor-derived neuroendocrine tumor

Although tumor transmission through liver transplantation (LT) is a rare occurrence, the consequences can be devastating, even when a very aggressive management approach is adopted. We report the case of a donor-derived small cell neuroendocrine tumor (NET) in a patient who underwent LT for cholangiocarcinoma. Despite locoregional therapy, chemotherapy and ultimately retransplantation, the patient died from metastases. The high grade nature of the NET was the most important determinant of prognosis in this case. Our experience suggests that retransplantation for donor-derived NET should only be considered when tumor biology is favorable.

Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration diagnosis of duodenal high grade neuroendocrine carcinoma underlying a villous adenoma: report of a case

Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy is a reliable and accurate method for the diagnosis of submucosal lesions of the gastrointestinal tract. We report the cytopathologic findings of a case of duodenal high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma in a 68-year-old woman who presented with melena and marked anemia, 45 years after kidney transplantation. Imaging studies performed in the work-up of melena showed a duodenal mass, which on endoscopy proved to be an exophytic, villous duodenal lesion, 3 cm from the ampulla. Forceps biopsy of the exophytic lesion showed a villous adenoma. Endoscopic ultrasound additionally revealed an underlying submucosal lesion and EUS-guided fine needle aspiration of this submucosal mass and of the enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes was diagnostic of a high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma. The aspirates showed abundant cellularity with tumor cells arranged in sheets and occasional loose clusters. The neoplastic cells had a moderate amount of pale cytoplasm and large round to oval hyperchromatic nuclei with focally prominent nucleoli. Mitoses, apoptotic bodies and necrotic debris were also present. The tumor cells were strongly and diffusely positive for cytokeratin AE1/AE3, synaptophysin and chromogranin and showed a very high proliferative fraction on Ki67 staining, supporting the diagnosis of a high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma. This is to our knowledge the first case of high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the duodenum diagnosed by EUS-FNA. This case also emphasizes the diagnostic value of EUS-FNA sampling of the submucosal and intramural component of villous tumors of the gastrointestinal tract when mucosal forceps biopsies show only benign findings.

Tasmanian devil facial tumor disease: insights into reduced tumor surveillance from an unusual malignancy

Tasmanian devil facial tumor disease (DFTD) is a highly aggressive cancer involving the facial tissues that currently presents a serious extinction risk for the Tasmanian devil population. Although the histogenesis is uncertain, an origin from a neural crest cell-lineage is considered likely. Epidemiological, cytogenetic and immunological data all support the premise that DFTD arose from a single tumor clone from an individual diseased animal, and is being transmitted between individual animals as a tumor "allograft" by biting during social interaction. The spread of this cancer throughout the species is believed to be facilitated by a reduced MHC diversity, possibly as a result of an evolutionary bottleneck. The pathogenesis of DFTD has some similarities with certain human cancers, including donor-recipient tumor transmission, which may complicate organ transplantation, and certain forms of malignancy at the maternal/fetal interface. The natural history and pathology of DFTD, and the data describing this highly unusual tumor biology are discussed.

Organ recipients suffering from undifferentiated neuroendocrine small-cell carcinoma of donor origin: a case report

BACKGROUND

Transmission of donor-derived cancer by organ transplantation is rare, but the risk has been increasing due to the aging donor pool. Undifferentiated neuroendocrine small-cell carcinoma is an aggressive tumor with the tendency to spread. Herein we have demonstrated different approaches to treat organ recipients with transmitted tumors.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Grafts were retrieved from a decreased donor without any history of previous diseases. Autopsy was not performed after donation. The recipient of the liver graft presented with suspected nodules on routine abdominal ultrasound. After computed tomography (CT) scan, biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of a small-cell carcinoma. Donor origin was unequivocally identified by DNA fingerprinting. Despite chemotherapy the patient died 7 months after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). All involved transplantation centers were informed immediately following diagnosis. The male kidney recipient underwent detailed diagnostic work-up to exclude tumor transmission. One year after transplantation, liver metastases caused by a histologically proven small-cell carcinoma from the same donor were apparent. Chemotherapy was immediately started and the graft was removed. Despite continued treatment the tumor progressed and the patient died after repeated intestinal complications. The pathological examination of the explanted second kidney graft did not show any tumor infiltration.

CONCLUSION

Therapeutic regimens in recipients suffering from donor-derived carcinoma differ depending on the transplanted organ. Graft removal of non-life-sustaining organs and discontinuation of immunosuppressive medication should result in complete tumor rejection. Minimizing the risk of tumor transmission, a CT scan might be advisable in donors of more advanced age.

[Renal transplantation and tumour transmission]

The transplanted kidney can be a vector of various diseases including tumours. These tumours, arising from donor cells, can be benign or malignant renal tumours or extrarenal tumours transmitted to the recipient in the form of occult metastases in the transplant. The authors review the statistical risks, prevention and therapeutic management of these tumours transmitted during renal transplantation.

Donor derived malignancy following transplantation: a review

Organ and tissue transplant is now the treatment of choice for many end stage diseases. In the recent years, there has been an increasing demand for organs but not a similar increase in the supply leading to a severe shortage of organs for transplant resulted in increasing wait times for recipients. This has resulted in expanded donor criteria to include older donors and donors with mild disease. In spite of implementation of more stringent criteria for donor selection, there continues to be some risk of donor derived malignancy. Malignancy after transplantation can occur in three different ways: (a) de-novo occurrence, (b) recurrence of malignancy, and (c) donor-related malignancy. Donor related malignancy can be either due to direct transmission of tumor or due to tumor arising in cells of donor origin. We will review donor related malignancies following solid organ transplantation and hematopoeitic progenitor cell transplantation. Further, we will briefly review the methods for detection and management of these donor related malignancies.

Merkel cell carcinoma in organ-transplant recipients: report of two cases with unusual histological features and literature review

BACKGROUND

Non-melanoma skin cancers are the commonest malignancies after organ transplantation and are often associated with human papillomavirus (HPV). Merkel cell carcinoma is an uncommon neuroendocrine skin tumor, of which 67 cases have been reported up till now, usually briefly, in organ transplant patients.

METHODS

Among a cohort of 2340 organ-transplant recipients, two patients (one renal, one heart) developed cutaneous Merkel cell carcinomas 5 and 12 years of post graft, respectively. These were studied histologically and immunohistochemically, as well as virologically for the presence of HPV. A thorough literature review of all reported cases of Merkel cell carcinoma following solid organ transplantation was performed.

RESULTS

Despite a typical immunophenotype, the tumors showed unusual histological features: both were epidermotropic, and one was intermingled with a bowenoid squamous cell carcinoma. Search for HPV by immunohistochemistry and PCR proved negative in both cases.

CONCLUSION

In the setting of organ transplantation, Merkel cell carcinoma is much rarer than other non melanoma skin cancers but may show unusual histologic features. HPV do not seem to be involved in its pathogenesis.

ORTHOTOPIC ILEAL NEOBLADDER RECONSTRUCTION IN PATIENTS WITH BLADDER CANCER FOLLOWING RENAL TRANSPLANTATION

PURPOSE

We analyzed the safety and clinical outcome in a single institution experience with orthotopic ileal neobladder reconstruction following radical cystectomy for transitional cell carcinoma in renal transplant recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From April 1986 to December 2003 radical cystectomy and orthotopic ileal neobladder reconstruction were performed in 760 consecutive patients with bladder cancer, of whom 4 had bladder cancer a median of 10.5 years after renal transplantation. The postoperative clinical course and long-term results in these patients were reviewed.

RESULTS

Median followup after surgery was 51.5 months (range 11 to 118). Two patients died at 11 and 15 months of tumor progression and a pulmonary embolism, respectively, whereas 2 were alive at a mean followup of 90 months with no evidence of disease. No neobladder related reoperations were necessary. Serum creatinine as a marker of renal function was stable in 3 patients. In 1 patient chronic graft rejection led to progressive renal failure and hemodialysis. Urinary continence was satisfactory during the day and night with spontaneous voiding in all patients and no significant post-void residual urine.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge this is the largest reported series of orthotopic ileal neobladder replacement following radical cystectomy in renal transplant recipients. Our results demonstrate the feasibility of radical cystectomy and orthotopic urinary reconstruction in patients with a renal transplant who have good functional and oncological results despite the high comorbidity in this group.

Epidemiologic study on the origin of cancer after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND

Subjects who underwent solid organ transplantation are at higher risk for a wide variety of cancers.

METHODS

The authors investigated the origin of cancer in a cohort of 2,526 patients followed up for 60.7 +/- 35.6 months after kidney transplantation between 1990 and 2000 in seven transplant centers.

RESULTS

One hundred four of them developed cancer. All subjects who developed solid cancer within 6 months after transplantation (n=10) and a group of subjects who developed solid cancer after 6 months posttransplant (n=10) were selected. Short tandem repeat analysis was performed on paraffin-embedded biopsy specimens of tumors and on both donor and recipient pretransplant peripheral blood. Biologic material was obtained in 17 of the 20 selected patients (85.0%). The analysis showed that 16 of 17 tumors were genetically identical to the recipient.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' results suggest that donor transmission of solid cancer is an unlikely event in their population.

Treatment and Outcome of Invasive Bladder Cancer in Patients After Renal Transplantation

PURPOSE

Optimal management and clinical outcome of bladder cancer in renal transplant recipients are not well-defined. We analyzed single institution treatment strategies and outcomes of these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the University of California, San Francisco transplant database which contains information on 6,288 renal transplants performed between 1964 and 2002. The United Network for Organ Sharing database and Israel Penn International Transplant Tumor Registry were also queried to characterize the global nature of bladder cancer in renal transplant recipients.

RESULTS

The United Network for Organ Sharing database (1986 to 2001) contained information on 31 patients who were found to have bladder cancer (0.024% prevalence) and the Israel Penn International Transplant Tumor Registry (1967 to 2001) contained information on 135 patients representing 0.84% of all reported malignancies. We identified 7 renal transplant recipients with bladder cancer at our institution. Invasive transitional cell carcinoma developed in 5 patients at a median of 2.8 years after transplant. Three patients underwent uncomplicated radical cystectomy and preservation of the renal allograft. Overall survival at 48 months was 60%.

CONCLUSIONS

Bladder cancer after renal transplantation is not common. For patients who present with invasive disease, traditional extirpative surgery should be considered. Moreover, the allograft is rarely the source of transitional cell carcinoma and can be preserved. In our experience the cancer and urinary outcomes compare favorably with nontransplant patient outcomes after treatment.

Unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of donor origin treated with immunosuppression withdrawal and liver retransplantation

Posttransplantation allograft malignancy of donor origin is a rare complication after liver transplantation. In the case described, subjective fevers and nonspecific abdominal complaints nearly 6 months following cadaveric liver transplantation in a young woman prompted an evaluation which was remarkable for a large central liver mass. A poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma was diagnosed, but was unresectable at exploration. The tumor was confined to the liver. Histocompatibility testing using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification techniques identified both donor and recipient HLA alleles. The patient was treated with chemoembolization, systemic chemotherapy and cessation of immunosuppression. Repeat biopsy 2 months later showed the tumor to be completely necrotic. With decompensated liver disease, she was relisted and retransplanted. More than 2 years later she remains disease-free with complete pathological remission. This is the only reported case of squamous cell carcinoma of donor origin arising in a transplanted liver.

Origin of adenocarcinoma in a transplanted liver determined by microsatellite analysis

Inadvertent transmission of neoplastic cells from an organ donor can occur at the time of transplantation. Determination of recipient versus donor origin of a tumor is crucial for patient management. This report illustrates the use of microsatellite (MS) analysis to determine the origin of adenocarcinoma arising in a liver transplant. The study patient was a 42-year-old male who had received a liver transplant for hepatitis C and alcohol-related cirrhosis. At the 1-year follow-up visit, a 1.5-cm liver mass was identified during routine ultrasound of the vascular anastamoses. A liver biopsy showed a moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Tumor, donor, and recipient DNA were isolated from the paraffin-embedded liver biopsy, pretransplant donor liver biopsy, and the explant liver tissue, respectively. MS analysis was performed by polymerase chain reaction using 5 markers: D5S346, ACTC, D2S123, D18S34, and TP53. The allelic patterns of tumor DNA were identical to those of donor DNA and were distinct from the DNA profile of the recipient. The use of MS analysis clearly established that the adenocarcinoma was of donor origin.