Regulating centrosomes by protein phosphorylation

Endosulfine alpha maintains spindle pole integrity by recruiting Aurora A during mitosis

BACKGROUND

The maintenance of spindle pole integrity is essential for spindle assembly and chromosome segregation during mitosis. However, the underlying mechanisms governing spindle pole integrity remain unclear.

METHODS

ENSA was inhibited by siRNA or MKI-2 treatment and its effect on cell cycle progression, chromosome alignment and microtubule alignment was observed by immunohistochemical staining and western blotting. PP2A-B55α knockdown by siRNA was performed to rescue the phenotype caused by ENSA inhibition. The interaction between ENSA and Aurora A was detected by in situ PLA. Furthermore, orthotopic implantation of 4Tl-luc cancer cells was conducted to confirm the consistency between the in vitro and in vivo relationship of the ENSA-Aurora A interaction.

RESULTS

During mitosis, p-ENSA is localized at the spindle poles, and the inhibition of ENSA results in mitotic defects, such as misaligned chromosomes, multipolar spindles, asymmetric bipolar spindles, and centrosome defects, with a delay in mitotic progression. Although the mitotic delay caused by ENSA inhibition was rescued by PP2A-B55α depletion, spindle pole defects persisted. Notably, we observed a interaction between ENSA and Aurora A during mitosis, and inhibition of ENSA reduced Aurora A expression at the mitotic spindle poles. Injecting MKI-2-sensitized tumors led to increased chromosomal instability and downregulation of the MASTL-ENSA-Aurora A pathway in an orthotopic breast cancer mouse model.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings provide novel insights into the regulation of spindle pole integrity by the MASTL-ENSA-Aurora A pathway during mitosis, highlighting the significance of ENSA in recruiting Aurora A to the spindle pole, independent of PP2A-B55α.

With Age Comes Maturity: Biochemical and Structural Transformation of a Human Centriole in the Making

Centrioles are microtubule-based cellular structures present in most human cells that build centrosomes and cilia. Proliferating cells have only two centrosomes and this number is stringently maintained through the temporally and spatially controlled processes of centriole assembly and segregation. The assembly of new centrioles begins in early S phase and ends in the third G1 phase from their initiation. This lengthy process of centriole assembly from their initiation to their maturation is characterized by numerous structural and still poorly understood biochemical changes, which occur in synchrony with the progression of cells through three consecutive cell cycles. As a result, proliferating cells contain three structurally, biochemically, and functionally distinct types of centrioles: procentrioles, daughter centrioles, and mother centrioles. This age difference is critical for proper centrosome and cilia function. Here we discuss the centriole assembly process as it occurs in somatic cycling human cells with a focus on the structural, biochemical, and functional characteristics of centrioles of different ages.

The Role of Protein Acetylation in Centrosome Biology

Acetylation is among the most prevalent posttranslational modifications in cells and regulates a number of physiological processes such as gene transcription, cell metabolism, and cell signaling. Although initially discovered on nuclear histones, many non-nuclear proteins have subsequently been found to be acetylated as well. The centrosome is the major microtubule-organizing center in most metazoans. Recent proteomic data indicate that a number of proteins in this subcellular compartment are acetylated. This review gives an overview of our current knowledge on protein acetylation at the centrosome and its functional relevance in organelle biology.

MLL5 maintains spindle bipolarity by preventing aberrant cytosolic aggregation of PLK1

Faithful chromosome segregation with bipolar spindle formation is critical for the maintenance of genomic stability. Perturbation of this process often leads to severe mitotic failure, contributing to tumorigenesis. MLL5 has been demonstrated to play vital roles in cell cycle progression and the maintenance of genomic stability. Here, we identify a novel interaction between MLL5 and PLK1 in the cytosol that is crucial for sustaining spindle bipolarity during mitosis. Knockdown of MLL5 caused aberrant PLK1 aggregation that led to acentrosomal microtubule-organizing center (aMTOC) formation and subsequent spindle multipolarity. Further molecular studies revealed that the polo-box domain (PBD) of PLK1 interacted with a binding motif on MLL5 (Thr887-Ser888-Thr889), and this interaction was essential for spindle bipolarity. Overexpression of wild-type MLL5 was able to rescue PLK1 mislocalization and aMTOC formation in MLL5-KD cells, whereas MLL5 mutants incapable of interacting with the PBD failed to do so. We thus propose that MLL5 preserves spindle bipolarity through maintaining cytosolic PLK1 in a nonaggregated form.

Nek2-targeted ASO or siRNA pretreatment enhances anticancer drug sensitivity in triple‑negative breast cancer cells

Although the anticancer drugs paclitaxel and doxorubicin are commonly used to treat many solid tumors, their effectiveness is highly variable due to tumor cell resistance. Therefore, it is important to find mechanisms that can be targeted to increase the sensitivity of cancer cells to current chemotherapeutic agents. NIMA‑related kinase 2 (Nek2), a serine/threonine kinase is emerging as an important oncogene because of its regulatory role in mitosis. Thus, regulation of the Nek2 expression levels may prove important as a target for cancer treatment. The purpose of our study was to determine whether drug sensitivity was increased in the triple negative breast cancer cell lines MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 by using small interfering RNA (siRNA) and antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) against Nek2. To this end, MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 breast cancer cells transfected with Nek2 siRNA or ASO were exposed to various concentrations of paclitaxel and doxorubicin. Cell viability, cell cycle distribution and apoptosis were evaluated. We observed that drug susceptibility in these transfected cells was dramatically increased compared with either agent alone. FACS results showed that apoptosis was induced in siRNA- and ASO‑transfected cells as expected due to the regulatory function of Nek2 in centrosome duplication. Interestingly, the cell cyle was not arrested in transfected cells. We found that siRNA and ASO against Nek2 worked synergistically with paclitaxel and doxorubicin by promoting cell apoptosis. Our results suggest that these drugs in combination with Nek2 siRNA or ASO treatment may improve the sensitivity of cancer cells during chemotherapy treatments.

The centrosome and cell proliferation

Centrosomes are frequently amplified in cancer cells. Increased numbers of centrosomes can give rise to multipolar spindles in mitosis, and thereby lead to the formation of aneuploid daughter cells. However, whether centrosome amplification is a cause or a consequence of cancer is unclear. In contrast, loss of a functional centrosome has been shown to lead to cell cycle arrest. In this review, the potential mechanisms underlying centrosome amplification and centrosome-dependent cell cycle regulation are discussed.

Inhibition of centrosome protein assembly leads to p53-dependent exit from the cell cycle

Previous evidence has indicated that an intact centrosome is essential for cell cycle progress and that elimination of the centrosome or depletion of individual centrosome proteins prevents the entry into S phase. To investigate the molecular mechanisms of centrosome-dependent cell cycle progress, we performed RNA silencing experiments of two centrosome-associated proteins, pericentriolar material 1 (PCM-1) and pericentrin, in primary human fibroblasts. We found that cells depleted of PCM-1 or pericentrin show lower levels of markers for S phase and cell proliferation, including cyclin A, Ki-67, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, minichromosome maintenance deficient 3, and phosphorylated retinoblastoma protein. Also, the percentage of cells undergoing DNA replication was reduced by >50%. At the same time, levels of p53 and p21 increased in these cells, and cells were predisposed to undergo senescence. Conversely, depletion of centrosome proteins in cells lacking p53 did not cause any cell cycle arrest. Inhibition of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase rescued cell cycle activity after centrosome protein depletion, indicating that p53 is activated by the p38 stress pathway.

The Plk1 target Kizuna stabilizes mitotic centrosomes to ensure spindle bipolarity

Formation of a bipolar spindle is essential for faithful chromosome segregation at mitosis. Because centrosomes define spindle poles, defects in centrosome number and structural organization can lead to a loss of bipolarity. In addition, microtubule-mediated pulling and pushing forces acting on centrosomes and chromosomes are also important for bipolar spindle formation. Polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) is a highly conserved Ser/Thr kinase that has essential roles in the formation of a bipolar spindle with focused poles. However, the mechanism by which Plk1 regulates spindle-pole formation is poorly understood. Here, we identify a novel centrosomal substrate of Plk1, Kizuna (Kiz), depletion of which causes fragmentation and dissociation of the pericentriolar material from centrioles at prometaphase, resulting in multipolar spindles. We demonstrate that Kiz is critical for establishing a robust mitotic centrosome architecture that can endure the forces that converge on the centrosomes during spindle formation, and suggest that Plk1 maintains the integrity of the spindle poles by phosphorylating Kiz.

Deregulation of the centrosome cycle and the origin of chromosomal instability in cancer

Although we have begun to tap into the mechanisms behind Boveri's initial observation that supernumerary centrosomes cause chromosome missegregation in sea urchin eggs, there is still much left to discover with regard to chromosomal instability in cancer. Many of the molecular players involved in regulation of the centrosome and cell cycles, and the coupling of the two cycles to produce a bipolar mitotic spindle have been identified. One theme that has become apparent is that cross talk and interrelatedness of the pathways serve to provide redundant mechanisms to maintain genomic integrity. In spite of this, cells occasionally fall prey to insults that initiate and maintain the chromosomal instability that results in viable malignant tumours. Deregulation of centrosome structure is an integral aspect of the origin of chromosomal instability in many cancers. There are numerous routes to centrosome amplification including: environmental insults such as ionising radiation and exposure to estrogen (Li et al., 2005); failure of cytokinesis; and activating mutations in key regulators of centrosome structure and function. There are two models for initiation of centrosome amplification (Figure 2). In the first, centrosome duplication and chromosome replication remain coupled and cells enter G2 with 4N chromosomes and duplicated centrosomes. However, these cells may fail to complete mitosis, and thus reenter G1 as tetraploid cells with amplified centrosomes. In the second, the centrosome cycle is uncoupled from chromosome replication and cells go through one or more rounds of centriole/centrosome duplication in the absence of chromosome replication. If these cells then go through chromosome replication accompanied by another round of centrosome duplication, cells complete G2 with 4N chromosomes and more than 2 centrosomes, and therefore are predisposed to generate multipolar mitotic spindles. Fragmentation of centrosomes due to ionising radiation is a variation of the second model. Once centrosome amplification is present, even in a diploid cell, that cell has the potential to yield viable aneuploid progeny. The telophase cell in Figure 3C illustrates this scenario. In a normal telophase configuration, the total number of chromosomes is 92 (resulting from the segregation of 46 pairs of chromatids), with each daughter nucleus containing 46 individual chromosomes. Based on the number of kinetochore signals present, the lower nucleus in Figure 3C has approximately 28 chromosomes, and the elongate upper nucleus has approximately 60, for a total of 88. Due to superimposition of kinetochores in this maximum projection image, 88 is an underestimate of the actual number of kinetochores and is not significantly different from the expected total of 92. A cell resulting from the lower nucleus with only around 28 chromosomes would probably not be viable, much as Boveri's experiments indicated. However, the upper nucleus with at least 60 chromosomes could be viable. This cell would enter G1 as hypotriploid (69 chromosomes = triploid) with 2 centrosomes. During S and G2, the centrosomes and chromosomes would double, and the following mitosis could be tetrapolar with a 6N chromosome content. When centrosome amplification is accompanied by permissive lapses in cell cycle checkpoints, the potential for malignant growth is present. These lapses could result from specific genetic mutations and amplifications, epigenetic gene silencing, or from massive chromosomal instability caused by the centrosome amplification. Centrosome amplification, therefore, can serve to exacerbate and/or generate genetic instabilities associated with cancers.

Centrosomal microtubule nucleation activity is inhibited by BRCA1-dependent ubiquitination

In this study we find that the function of BRCA1 inhibits the microtubule nucleation function of centrosomes. In particular, cells in early S phase have quiescent centrosomes due to BRCA1 activity, which inhibits the association of gamma-tubulin with centrosomes. We find that modification of either of two specific lysine residues (Lys-48 and Lys-344) of gamma-tubulin, a known substrate for BRCA1-dependent ubiquitination activity, led to centrosome hyperactivity. Interestingly, mutation of gamma-tubulin lysine 344 had a minimal effect on centrosome number but a profound effect on microtubule nucleation function, indicating that the processes regulating centrosome duplication and microtubule nucleation are distinct. Using an in vitro aster formation assay, we found that BRCA1-dependent ubiquitination activity directly inhibits microtubule nucleation by centrosomes. Mutant BRCA1 protein that was inactive as a ubiquitin ligase did not inhibit aster formation by the centrosome. Further, a BRCA1 carboxy-terminal truncation mutant that was an active ubiquitin ligase lacked domains critical for the inhibition of centrosome function. These experiments reveal an important new functional assay regulated by the BRCA1-dependent ubiquitin ligase, and the results suggest that the loss of this BRCA1 activity could cause the centrosome hypertrophy and subsequent aneuploidy typically found in breast cancers.

Centrosome amplification and the origin of chromosomal instability in breast cancer

The development and progression of aggressive breast cancer is characterized by genomic instability leading to multiple genetic defects, phenotypic diversity, chemoresistance, and poor outcome. Centrosome abnormalities have been implicated in the origin of chromosomal instability through the development of multipolar mitotic spindles. Breast tumor centrosomes display characteristic structural abnormalities, termed centrosome amplification , including: increase in centrosome number and volume, accumulation of excess pericentriolar material, supernumerary centrioles, and inappropriate phosphorylation of centrosome proteins. In addition, breast tumor centrosomes also show functional abnormalities characterized by inappropriate centrosome duplication during the cell cycle and nucleation of unusually large microtubule arrays. These observations have important implications for understanding the mechanisms underlying genomic instability and loss of cell polarity in cancer. This review focuses on the coordination of the centrosome, DNA, and cell cycles in normal cells and their deregulation resulting in centrosome amplification and chromosomal instability in the development and progression of breast cancer.

DAP-like kinase, a member of the death-associated protein kinase family, associates with centrosomes, centromers, and the contractile ring during mitosis

DAP-like kinase (Dlk) is a nuclear serine/threonine-specific kinase which has been implicated in apoptosis. However, induction of apoptosis by Dlk requires its relocation to the cytoplasm, particularly association with the actin cytoskeleton, which is achieved through interaction with pro-apoptotic protein Par-4. On the other hand, nuclear Dlk does not induce apoptosis and has rather been implicated in transcription. To further explore the biological functions of Dlk, we established a cell clone of MCF-7 cells stably expressing a GFP-Dlk fusion protein at low level. Ectopic expression of GFP-Dlk did not affect the growth properties of the cells. During interphase, GFP-Dlk showed a diffuse nuclear distribution with punctate staining in a subpopulation of cells. During mitosis, however, Dlk was associated with centrosomes, centromeres, and the contractile ring, but not with the mitotic spindle. Association with centrosomes, as confirmed by colocalization with gamma-tubulin and pericentrin persisted throughout mitosis but was also seen in interphase cells. Interestingly, GFP-Dlk and gamma-tubulin could be co-immunoprecipitated indicating that they are present in the same protein complex. Association of Dlk with centromeres, as verified by confocal fluorescence microscopy with centromere-specific antibodies was more restricted and discernable from prophase to early anaphase. Centromere association of Dlk coincides with H3 phosphorylation at Thr11 that is specifically phosphorylated by Dlk in vitro (U. Preuss, G. Landsberg, K. H. Scheidtmann, Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 878-885, 2003). During cytokinesis, Dlk was enriched in the contractile acto-myosin ring and colocalized with Ser19-phosphorylated myosin light chain, which is an in vitro substrate of Dlk. Strikingly, a C-terminal truncation mutant of Dlk generated multi-nucleated cells. Together, these data suggest that Dlk participates in regulation and, perhaps, coordination of mitotis and cytokinesis.

Centrosome maturation: measurement of microtubule nucleation throughout the cell cycle by using GFP-tagged EB1

Understanding how cells regulate microtubule nucleation during the cell cycle has been limited by the inability to directly observe nucleation from the centrosome. To view nucleation in living cells, we imaged GFP-tagged EB1, a microtubule tip-binding protein, and determined rates of nucleation by counting the number of EB1-GFP comets emerging from the centrosome over time. Nucleation rate increased 4-fold between G(2) and prophase and continued to rise through anaphase and telophase, reaching a maximum of 7 times interphase rates. We tested several models for centrosome maturation, including gamma-tubulin recruitment and increased centrosome size. The centrosomal concentration of gamma-tubulin reached a maximum at metaphase, and centrosome size increased through anaphase, whereas nucleation remained high through telophase, implying the presence of additional regulatory processes. Injection of anti-gamma-tubulin antibodies significantly blocked nucleation during metaphase but was less effective during anaphase, suggesting that a nucleation mechanism independent of gamma-tubulin contributes to centrosome function after metaphase.

Molecular and functional analysis of the dictyostelium centrosome

The centrosome is a nonmembranous, nucleus-associated organelle that functions not only as the main microtubule-organizing center but also as a cell cycle control unit. How the approximately 100 different proteins that make up a centrosome contribute to centrosome function is still largely unknown. Considerable progress in the understanding of centrosomal functions can be expected from comparative cell biology of morphologically different centrosomal structures fulfilling conserved functions. Dictyostelium is an alternative model organism for centrosome research in addition to yeast and animal cells. With the elucidation of morphological changes and dynamics of centrosome duplication, the establishment of a centrosome isolation protocol, and the identification of many centrosomal components, there is a solid basis for understanding the biogenesis and function of this fascinating organelle. Here we give an overview of the prospective protein inventory of the Dictyostelium centrosome based on database searches. Moreover, we focus on the comparative cell biology of known components of the Dictyostelium centrosome including the gamma-tubulin complex and the homologues of centrin, Nek2, XMAP215, and EB1.

Irod/Ian5: an inhibitor of gamma-radiation- and okadaic acid-induced apoptosis

Protein phosphatase-directed toxins such as okadaic acid (OA) are general apoptosis inducers. We show that a protein (inhibitor of radiation- and OA-induced apoptosis, Irod/Ian5), belonging to the family of immune-associated nucleotide binding proteins, protected Jurkat T-cells against OA- and gamma-radiation-induced apoptosis. Unlike previously described antiapoptotic proteins Irod/Ian5 did not protect against anti-Fas, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, staurosporine, UV-light, or a number of chemotherapeutic drugs. Irod antagonized a calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II-dependent step upstream of activation of caspase 3. Irod has predicted GTP-binding, coiled-coil, and membrane binding domains. Irod localized to the centrosomal/Golgi/endoplasmic reticulum compartment. Deletion of either the C-terminal membrane binding domain or the N-terminal GTP-binding domain did not affect the antiapoptotic function of Irod, nor the centrosomal localization. The middle part of Irod, containing the coiled-coil domain, was therefore responsible for centrosomal anchoring and resistance toward death. Being widely expressed and able to protect also nonimmune cells, the function of Irod may not be limited to the immune system. The function and localization of Irod indicate that the centrosome and calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II may have important roles in apoptosis signaling.

Regulated expression of the centrosomal protein DdCP224 affects microtubule dynamics and reveals mechanisms for the control of supernumerary centrosome number

The Dictyostelium XMAP215 family member DdCP224 is involved in centrosome duplication and cytokinesis and is concentrated at the centrosome and microtubule tips. Herein, we have created a DdCP224 promoter replacement mutant that allows both over- and underexpression. Overexpression led to supernumerary microtubule-organizing centers and, independently, an increase of the number of multinuclear cells. Electron microscopy demonstrated that supernumerary microtubule-organizing centers represented bona fide centrosomes. Live cell imaging of DdCP224-green fluorescent protein mutants also expressing green fluorescent protein-histone2B as a DNA label revealed that supernumerary centrosomes were also competent of cell cycle-dependent duplication. In contrast, underexpression of DdCP224 inhibited cell growth, reduced the number and length of astral microtubules, and caused nocodazole hypersensitivity. Moreover, microtubule regrowth after nocodazole removal was dependent on DdCP224. Underexpression also resulted in a striking disappearance of supernumerary centrosomes and multinuclear cells caused by previous overexpression. We show for the first time by live cell observation that the number of supernumerary centrosomes can be reduced either by centrosome fusion (coalescence) or by the formation of cytoplasts containing supernumerary centrosomes during cytokinesis.

SAS-4 is a C. elegans centriolar protein that controls centrosome size

Centrosomes consist of a centriole pair surrounded by pericentriolar material (PCM). Previous work suggested that centrioles are required to organize PCM to form a structurally stable organelle. Here, we characterize SAS-4, a centriole component in Caenorhabditis elegans. Like tubulin, SAS-4 is incorporated into centrioles during their duplication and remains stably associated thereafter. In the absence of SAS-4, centriole duplication fails. Partial depletion of SAS-4 results in structurally defective centrioles that contain reduced levels of SAS-4 and organize proportionally less PCM. Thus, SAS-4 is a centriole-associated component whose amount dictates centrosome size. These results provide novel insight into the poorly understood role of centrioles as centrosomal organizers.

Centrosome maturation and mitotic spindle assembly in C. elegans require SPD-5, a protein with multiple coiled-coil domains

The maternally expressed C. elegans gene spd-5 encodes a centrosomal protein with multiple coiled-coil domains. During mitosis in mutants with reduced levels of SPD-5, microtubules assemble but radiate from condensed chromosomes without forming a spindle, and mitosis fails. SPD-5 is required for the centrosomal localization of gamma-tubulin, XMAP-215, and Aurora A kinase family members, but SPD-5 accumulates at centrosomes in mutants lacking these proteins. Furthermore, SPD-5 interacts genetically with a dynein heavy chain. We propose that SPD-5, along with dynein, is required for centrosome maturation and mitotic spindle assembly.

The Nek2 protein kinase: a novel regulator of centrosome structure

Regulation of the centrosome, the major microtubule organizing centre in an animal cell, is in large part controlled by cell cycle-dependent protein phosphorylation. Along with cyclin dependent kinases, polo kinases and Aurora kinases, NIMA-related kinases are emerging as critical regulators of centrosome structure and function. Nek2 is the most closely related vertebrate protein by sequence to the essential mitotic regulator NIMA of Aspergillus nidulans. Nek2 is highly enriched at the centrosome and functional studies in human and Xenopus systems support a role for Nek2 in both maintenance and modulation of centrosome architecture. In particular, current evidence supports a model in which one function of Nek2 kinase activity is to promote the splitting of duplicated centrosomes at the onset of mitosis through phosphorylation of core centriolar proteins. Recent studies in lower organisms have raised the possibility that kinases related to Nek2 may have conserved functions in MTOC organization, as well as in other aspects of mitotic progression.

DdNek2, the first non-vertebrate homologue of human Nek2, is involved in the formation of microtubule-organizing centers

Dictyostelium Nek2 (DdNek2) is the first structural and functional non-vertebrate homologue of human Nek2, a NIMA-related serine/threonine kinase required for centrosome splitting in early mitosis. DdNek2 shares 43% overall amino-acid identity with its human counterpart and 54% identity within the catalytic domain. Both proteins can be subdivided in an N-terminal catalytic domain, a leucine zipper and a C-terminal domain. Kinase assays with bacterially expressed DdNek2 and C-terminal deletion mutants revealed that catalytic activity requires the presence of the leucine zipper and that autophosphorylation occurs at the C-terminus. Microscopic analyses with DdNek2 antibodies and expression of a GFP-DdNek2 fusion protein in Dictyostelium showed that DdNek2 is a permanent centrosomal resident and suggested that it is a component of the centrosomal core. The GFP-DdNek2-overexpressing mutants frequently exhibit supernumerary microtubule-organizing centers (MTOCs). This phenotype did not require catalytic activity because it was also observed in cells expressing inactive GFP-K33R. However, it was shown to be caused by overexpression of the C-terminal domain since it also occurred in GFP-mutants expressing only the C-terminus or a leucine zipper/C-terminus construct but not in those mutants expressing only the catalytic domain or a catalytic domain/leucine zipper construct. These results suggest that DdNek2 is involved in the formation of MTOCs. Furthermore, the localization of the GFP-fusion proteins revealed two independent centrosomal targeting domains of DdNek2, one within the catalytic or leucine zipper domain and one in the C-terminal domain.

Integration of the centrosome in cell cycle control, stress response and signal transduction pathways

The identification of cell cycle control and signal transduction components on the centrosome has fostered the idea that the centrosome is more than a microtubule-organizing center. Indeed, recent molecular evidence suggests that the centrosome plays an active role not only in the regulation of microtubule nucleation activity, but also in the coordination of centrosome duplication with cell cycle progression, in stress response and in cell cycle checkpoint control. To achieve these roles, it interacts with a multitude of signal transduction molecules. The specificity of the interactions is mediated through anchoring proteins that bring centrosomal components and regulatory proteins into close proximity. The molecular composition and organization of the centrosome thus reflects its multiple functions.

Alternative splice variants of the human centrosome kinase Nek2 exhibit distinct patterns of expression in mitosis

Nek2 is a cell-cycle-regulated protein kinase that localizes to the centrosome and is likely to be involved in regulating centrosome structure at the G(2)/M transition. Here, we localize the functional human Nek2 gene to chromosome 1 and show that alternative polyadenylation signals provide a mechanism for generating two distinct isoforms. Sequencing of products generated by reverse transcriptase PCR, immunoblotting of cell extracts and transfection of antisense oligonucleotides together demonstrate that human Nek2 is expressed as two splice variants. These isoforms, designated Nek2A and Nek2B, are detected in primary blood lymphocytes as well as adult transformed cells. Nek2A and Nek2B, which can form homo- and hetero-dimers, both localize to the centrosome, although only Nek2A can induce centrosome splitting upon overexpression. Importantly, Nek2A and Nek2B exhibit distinct patterns of cell-cycle-dependent expression. Both are present in low amounts in the G(1) phase and exhibit increased abundance in the S and G(2) phases. However, Nek2A disappears in prometaphase-arrested cells, whereas Nek2B remains elevated. These results demonstrate that two alternative splice variants of the human centrosomal kinase Nek2 exist that differ in their expression patterns during mitosis. This has important implications for our understanding of both Nek2 protein kinase regulation and the control of centrosome structure during mitosis.

Aurora-A kinase is required for centrosome maturation in Caenorhabditis elegans

Centrosomes mature as cells enter mitosis, accumulating gamma-tubulin and other pericentriolar material (PCM) components. This occurs concomitant with an increase in the number of centrosomally organized microtubules (MTs). Here, we use RNA-mediated interference (RNAi) to examine the role of the aurora-A kinase, AIR-1, during centrosome maturation in Caenorhabditis elegans. In air-1(RNAi) embryos, centrosomes separate normally, an event that occurs before maturation in C. elegans. After nuclear envelope breakdown, the separated centrosomes collapse together, and spindle assembly fails. In mitotic air-1(RNAi) embryos, centrosomal alpha-tubulin fluorescence intensity accumulates to only 40% of wild-type levels, suggesting a defect in the maturation process. Consistent with this hypothesis, we find that AIR-1 is required for the increase in centrosomal gamma-tubulin and two other PCM components, ZYG-9 and CeGrip, as embryos enter mitosis. Furthermore, the AIR-1-dependent increase in centrosomal gamma-tubulin does not require MTs. These results suggest that aurora-A kinases are required to execute a MT-independent pathway for the recruitment of PCM during centrosome maturation.

APC/C-mediated destruction of the centrosomal kinase Nek2A occurs in early mitosis and depends upon a cyclin A-type D-box

Nek2 is a NIMA-related kinase implicated in regulating centrosome structure at the G(2)/M transition. Two splice variants have been identified that exhibit distinct patterns of expression during cell cycle progression and development. Here we show that Nek2A, but not Nek2B, is destroyed upon entry into mitosis coincident with cyclin A destruction and in the presence of an active spindle assembly checkpoint. Destruction of Nek2A is mediated by the proteasome and is dependent upon the APC/C-Cdc20 ubiquitin ligase. Nek2 activity is not required for APC/C activation. Nek2A destruction in early mitosis is regulated by a motif in its extreme C-terminus which bears a striking resemblance to the extended destruction box (D-box) of cyclin A. Complete stabilization of Nek2A requires deletion of this motif and mutation of a KEN-box. Destruction of Nek2A is not inhibited by the cyclin B-type D-box, but the C-terminal domain of Nek2A inhibits destruction of both cyclins A and B. We propose that recognition of substrates by the APC/C-Cdc20 in early mitosis depends upon possession of an extended D-box motif.

Centrosome cohesion is regulated by a balance of kinase and phosphatase activities

Centrosome cohesion and separation are regulated throughout the cell cycle, but the underlying mechanisms are not well understood. Since overexpression of a protein kinase, Nek2, is able to trigger centrosome splitting (the separation of parental centrioles), we have surveyed a panel of centrosome-associated kinases for their ability to induce a similar phenotype. Cdk2, in association with either cyclin A or E, was as effective as Nek2, but several other kinases tested did not significantly interfere with centrosome cohesion. Centrosome splitting could also be triggered by inhibition of phosphatases, and protein phosphatase 1 alpha (PP1 alpha) was identified as a likely physiological antagonist of Nek2. Furthermore, we have revisited the role of the microtubule network in the control of centrosome cohesion. We could confirm that microtubule depolymerization by nocodazole causes centrosome splitting. Surprisingly, however, this drug-induced splitting also required kinase activity and could specifically be suppressed by a dominant-negative mutant of Nek2. These studies highlight the importance of protein phosphorylation in the control of centrosome cohesion, and they point to Nek2 and PP1 alpha as critical regulators of centrosome structure.

Overexpression of simian virus 40 small-T antigen blocks centrosome function and mitotic progression in human fibroblasts

Recombinant adenoviruses that express high levels of the simian virus 40 (SV40) small-t (ST) antigen have been used to study the requirement for ST to drive cell cycle proliferation of confluent human diploid fibroblasts. This occurs when either large-T (LT) antigen or serum is added to provide a second signal. While cells readily completed S phase in these experiments, they were found to accumulate with 4N DNA content. Cellular and nuclear morphology, as well as the biochemical status of cyclin B complexes, showed that these cells entered mitosis but were blocked prior to mitotic metaphase. The defect appears to reflect an inability of cells overexpressing ST to form organized centrosomes that duplicate and separate normally during the cell cycle and, therefore, the absence of a mitotic spindle. The ability of ST to bind protein phosphatase 2A was required for this pattern, suggesting that altered phosphorylation of key centrosomal components may occur when ST is overexpressed. Although the possible significance of ST effects on the centrosome cycle is not fully understood, these findings suggest that ST could influence chromosomal instability patterns that are a hallmark of SV40-transformed cells and LT expression.