A high-efficiency microwave thermoablation system for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: results of a randomized, sham-controlled, prospective, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial

Which improvements does Rezum bring to BPH management? A network meta-analysis and comparison of water vapor therapy and conduction ablation techniques

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of Rezum water vapor thermal therapy (Rezum) and compared them with those of traditional conduction ablation methods for the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A comprehensive review of studies from the PubMed, Cochrane, and EMBASE databases was performed. Only randomized clinical trials that reported the outcomes of thermal ablation treatments, including transurethral microwave therapy (TUMT), transurethral needle ablation (TUNA), and Rezum, were included. A network meta-analysis was performed to compare these treatments.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Sixteen studies comprising 1622 patients were included. Rezum did not show efficacy superior to that of traditional conduction ablation methods in terms of the International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life, peak urinary flow rate, and postvoid residual volume. The incidence of acute urinary retention associated with Rezum was similar to that associated with other conduction ablation methods of TUMT and TUNA and transurethral resection of the prostate. Regarding ejaculatory dysfunction, Rezum resulted in outcomes comparable to those of sham treatment. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking curve, Rezum resulted in the lowest incidence of ejaculatory dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Rezum provides functional outcomes of urinary symptoms that are comparable to those of conduction ablation therapies. Notably, among the minimally invasive thermal ablation therapies evaluated during this study, Rezum resulted in the lowest incidence of ejaculatory dysfunction.

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy with the CoreTherm®Concept in men with prostates larger than 100 grams - a consecutive case series

OBJECTIVE

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) is well described for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with prostates between 30 and 100 grams. We aimed to describe the results in men with prostates larger than 100 grams.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively recorded age, prostate size, occurrence of urinary retention, and Danish Prostate Symptom Score (DAN-PSS) prior to treatment in men with prostates exceeding 100 grams. Following treatment, we assessed satisfaction, DAN-PSS, and the results of uroflowmetry and postvoid residual urine.

RESULTS

We included 50 consecutive patients with prostates over 100 g. The median age was 78 years, and the median prostate size was 126 g (range 101-230). Forty-four men were treated due to urinary retention and 6 due to lower urinary tract symptoms. Treatments were performed under local anesthesia. The median duration was 15 minutes (range 8-32 minutes) and the median destruction was 25% of the prostatic volume (range 11-26%). Eight patients had destruction of <20%. No side effects were noted. Forty-nine patients completed 6-month follow-up. The 41/49 (84%) men who had tissue destruction of ≥20% reported to be satisfied. The median DAN-PSS score was 3 (range 0-18), the median Qmax was 12 mL/s (range 5.1-23.1 mL/s) and the median postvoid residual volume was 89 mL (range 0-331 mL). Symptoms were unchanged in the 8/49 (16%) men who had <20% tissue destruction.

CONCLUSIONS

TUMT represents a useful alternative to surgery in men with infravesical obstruction and a prostate of more than 100 grams.

Absence of Race/Ethnicity Reporting in Clinical Trials of True Minimally Invasive Surgical Therapies for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE

To assess the extent of racial reporting and enrollment in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of minimally invasive surgical therapies (MIST) for the office-based treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted for RCTs assessing 6 office-based MISTs: transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT), prostatic artery embolization, prostatic urethral lift, temporary implantable nitinol device, water vapor thermal therapy, and Optilume. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched up to November 3, 2023. Publications were excluded if they (1) did not address one of the aforementioned office-based MISTs for the treatment of BPH; (2) were not RCTs; (3) were an abstract or conference proceeding; or (4) were not published in English. In addition to study characteristics, data about racial reporting were collected. Two independent reviewers completed screening at title, abstract, and full-text levels, with conflicts resolved by consensus with a third reviewer.

RESULTS

A total of 61 publications representing 37 unique RCTs (n = 4027 unique patients) were reviewed, with publication years spanning from 1993 to 2023. TUMT was the most frequently studied MIST. Most publications (79%) were based solely in Europe or North America. Over 50% of the publications were multicenter trials. None of the included publications reported on race/ethnicity of study participants.

CONCLUSION

None of the 61 included publications of RCTs of office-based MISTs provided information on racial/ethnic composition of study participants. There is a staggering gap in the standardization of race/ethnicity reporting and enrollment within RCTs of MISTs. More granular data on race/ethnicity allow for better generalizability and equity.

A systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing Rezūm with transurethral needle ablation and microwave thermotherapy for the management of enlarged prostate

Objectives

We aim to compare efficacy and safety of water vapour therapy (Rezūm), transurethral needle ablation (TUNA) and transurethral microwave therapy (TUMT) for treating men with moderate to severe benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) symptoms.

Materials

PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to 30 July 2023, followed by reference searching and dual-independent study selection. We analysed only randomized clinical trials. RoB-2, NIH-quality assessment tool and GRADE guidelines were used for quality-of-evidence (QoE) assessment. Relevant prospective studies without a critical risk-of-bias were included.

Results

At 12 months, Rezūm showed similar efficacy to TUNA and TUMT for improvement in International Prostate Symptoms Score - Rezūm versus TUMT: 1.33 points (95% CI: -1.66 to 4.35) favouring TUMT (QoE: Moderate) and Rezūm versus TUNA: 0.07 points (95% CI: -3.64 to 3.88) favouring TUNA (QoE: Low). Rezum had similar outcomes to TUNA and TUMT for Maximum Peak-Flow Rate (Qmax): Rezūm versus TUMT: 1.05 mL/s (95% CI: -4.88 to 2.82) favouring Rezūm (QoE: Low) and Rezūm versus TUNA: 0.37 mL/s (95% CI: -4.61 to 4.21) favouring TUNA (QoE: Low). Furthermore, post-void residual volume (PVR) comparisons demonstrated that Rezūm was similar, or inferior to other techniques at 12 months - Rezūm versus TUMT: 11.20 mL (95% CI: -32.40 to 10.30) favouring TUMT (QoE: Low) and Rezūm versus TUNA: 24.10 mL (95% CI: 2.81 to 45.10) favouring TUNA (QoE: Low). Rezūm also had a similar surgical retreatment rate with TUMT and TUNA up to 3-years - TUMT versus Rezūm RR: 1.21 (95% CI: 0.20 to 15.90) (QoE: Low) and TUNA versus Rezūm showed RR: 1.81 (95% CI: 0.2 to 24.60) (QoE: Low). In the first 12 months after treatment, Rezūm had a higher rate of serious adverse events (Clavien-Dindo ≥ Grade 3) than TUMT and TUNA. TUMT versus Rezūm with RR = 0.53 (95% CI: 0.13 to 3.14) (QoE: Low) and TUNA versus Rezūm with RR = 0.38 (95% CI: 0.04 to 3.49) (QoE: Low).

Conclusions

Moderate to weak evidence suggests that Rezūm is not superior to TUNA and TUMT in all domains studied.

Transurethral Microwave Thermotherapy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: An Updated Cochrane Review

PURPOSE

To assess the effects of transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search using multiple databases up to May 2021, with no language or publication status restrictions. We included parallel-group randomized controlled trials of participants with BPH who underwent TUMT. We used standard Cochrane methods, including a GRADE assessment of the certainty of the evidence (CoE).

RESULTS

In this update of a previous Cochrane review, we included 16 trials with 1,919 participants. TUMT probably results in little to no difference in urologic symptom scores at short-term follow-up compared to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). There is likely to be little to no difference in the quality of life. TUMT likely results in fewer major adverse events. TUMT, however, probably results in a large increase in the need for retreatment. There may be little to no difference in erectile function between these interventions. However, TUMT may result in fewer cases of ejaculatory dysfunction compared to TURP. The overall CoE was moderate to low.

CONCLUSIONS

TUMT provides a similar reduction in urinary symptoms compared to TURP, with fewer major adverse events and fewer cases of ejaculatory dysfunction at short-term follow-up. However, TUMT probably results in a large increase in retreatment rates. Study limitations and imprecision reduced the confidence we can place in these results.

Minimally invasive treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia: a Cochrane network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the comparative effectiveness and ranking of minimally invasive treatments (MITs) for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched multiple databases up to 24 February 2021. We included randomized controlled trials assessing the following treatments: convective radiofrequency water vapour thermal therapy (WVTT; or Rezūm); prostatic arterial embolization (PAE); prostatic urethral lift (PUL; or Urolift); temporary implantable nitinol device (TIND); and transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) compared to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or sham surgery. We performed a frequentist network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

We included 27 trials involving 3017 men. The overall certainty of the evidence of most outcomes according to GRADE was low to very low. Compared to TURP, we found that PUL and PAE may result in little to no difference in urological symptoms, while WVTT, TUMT and TIND may result in worse urological symptoms. MITs may result in little to no difference in quality of life, compared to TURP. MITs may result in a large reduction in major adverse events compared to TURP. We were uncertain about the effects of PAE and PUL on retreatment compared to TURP, however, TUMT may result in higher retreatment rates. We were very uncertain of the effects of MITs on erectile function and ejaculatory function. Among MITs, PUL and PAE had the highest likelihood of being the most efficacious for urinary symptoms and quality of life, TUMT for major adverse events, WVTT and TIND for erectile function and PUL for ejaculatory function. Excluding WVTT and TIND, for which there were only studies with short-term (3-month) follow-up, PUL had the highest likelihood of being the most efficacious for retreatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive treatments may result in similar or worse effects concerning urinary symptoms and quality of life compared to TURP at short-term follow-up.

Minimally invasive treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

A variety of minimally invasive treatments are available as an alternative to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for management of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). However, it is unclear which treatments provide better results.

OBJECTIVES

Our primary objective was to assess the comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms in men with BPH through a network meta-analysis. Our secondary objective was to obtain an estimate of relative ranking of these minimally invasive treatments, according to their effects.

SEARCH METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search of multiple databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and LILACS), trials registries, other sources of grey literature, and conference proceedings, up to 24 February 2021. We had no restrictions on language of publication or publication status.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included parallel-group randomized controlled trials assessing the effects of the following minimally invasive treatments, compared to TURP or sham treatment, on men with moderate to severe LUTS due to BPH: convective radiofrequency water vapor therapy (CRFWVT); prostatic arterial embolization (PAE); prostatic urethral lift (PUL); temporary implantable nitinol device (TIND); and transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model for pair-wise comparisons and a frequentist network meta-analysis for combined estimates. We interpreted them according to Cochrane methods. We planned subgroup analyses by age, prostate volume, and severity of baseline symptoms. We used risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to express dichotomous data and mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs to express continuous data. We used the GRADE approach to rate the certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 27 trials involving 3017 men, mostly over age 50, with severe LUTS due to BPH. The overall certainty of evidence was low to very low due to concerns regarding bias, imprecision, inconsistency (heterogeneity), and incoherence. Based on the network meta-analysis, results for our main outcomes were as follows. Urologic symptoms (19 studies, 1847 participants): PUL and PAE may result in little to no difference in urologic symptoms scores (MD of International Prostate Symptoms Score [IPSS]) compared to TURP (3 to 12 months; MD range 0 to 35; higher scores indicate worse symptoms; PUL: 1.47, 95% CI -4.00 to 6.93; PAE: 1.55, 95% CI -1.23 to 4.33; low-certainty evidence). CRFWVT, TUMT, and TIND may result in worse urologic symptoms scores compared to TURP at short-term follow-up, but the CIs include little to no difference (CRFWVT: 3.6, 95% CI -4.25 to 11.46; TUMT: 3.98, 95% CI 0.85 to 7.10; TIND: 7.5, 95% CI -0.68 to 15.69; low-certainty evidence). Quality of life (QoL) (13 studies, 1459 participants): All interventions may result in little to no difference in the QoL scores, compared to TURP (3 to 12 months; MD of IPSS-QoL score; MD range 0 to 6; higher scores indicate worse symptoms; PUL: 0.06, 95% CI -1.17 to 1.30; PAE: 0.09, 95% CI -0.57 to 0.75; CRFWVT: 0.37, 95% CI -1.45 to 2.20; TUMT: 0.65, 95% CI -0.48 to 1.78; TIND: 0.87, 95% CI -1.04 to 2.79; low-certainty evidence). Major adverse events (15 studies, 1573 participants): TUMT probably results in a large reduction of major adverse events compared to TURP (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.43; moderate-certainty evidence). PUL, CRFWVT, TIND and PAE may also result in a large reduction in major adverse events, but CIs include substantial benefits and harms at three months to 36 months; PUL: RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.04 to 2.22; CRFWVT: RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.01 to 18.62; TIND: RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.01 to 24.46; PAE: RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.68; low-certainty evidence). Retreatment (10 studies, 799 participants): We are uncertain about the effects of PAE and PUL on retreatment compared to TURP (12 to 60 months; PUL: RR 2.39, 95% CI 0.51 to 11.1; PAE: RR 4.39, 95% CI 1.25 to 15.44; very low-certainty evidence). TUMT may result in higher retreatment rates (RR 9.71, 95% CI 2.35 to 40.13; low-certainty evidence). Erectile function (six studies, 640 participants): We are very uncertain of the effects of minimally invasive treatments on erectile function (MD of International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF-5]; range 5 to 25; higher scores indicates better function; CRFWVT: 6.49, 95% CI -8.13 to 21.12; TIND: 5.19, 95% CI -9.36 to 19.74; PUL: 3.00, 95% CI -5.45 to 11.44; PAE: -0.03, 95% CI -6.38, 6.32; very low-certainty evidence). Ejaculatory dysfunction (eight studies, 461 participants): We are uncertain of the effects of PUL, PAE and TUMT on ejaculatory dysfunction compared to TURP (3 to 12 months; PUL: RR 0.05, 95 % CI 0.00 to 1.06; PAE: RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.92; TUMT: RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.68; low-certainty evidence). TURP is the reference treatment with the highest likelihood of being the most efficacious for urinary symptoms, QoL and retreatment, but the least favorable in terms of major adverse events, erectile function and ejaculatory function. Among minimally invasive procedures, PUL and PAE have the highest likelihood of being the most efficacious for urinary symptoms and QoL, TUMT for major adverse events, PUL for retreatment, CRFWVT and TIND for erectile function and PUL for ejaculatory function.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive treatments may result in similar or worse effects concerning urinary symptoms and QoL compared to TURP at short-term follow-up. They may result in fewer major adverse events, especially in the case of PUL and PAE; resulting in better rankings for symptoms scores. PUL may result in fewer retreatments compared to other interventions, especially TUMT, which had the highest retreatment rates at long-term follow-up. We are very uncertain about the effects of these interventions on erectile function. There was limited long-term data, especially for CRFWVT and TIND. Future high-quality studies with more extended follow-up, comparing different, active treatment modalities, and adequately reporting critical outcomes relevant to patients, including those related to sexual function, could provide more information on the relative effectiveness of these interventions.

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia

BACKGROUND

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has been the gold-standard treatment for alleviating urinary symptoms and improving urinary flow in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). However, the morbidity of TURP approaches 20%, and less invasive techniques have been developed for treating BPH. Transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) is an alternative, minimally-invasive treatment that delivers microwave energy to produce coagulation necrosis in prostatic tissue. This is an update of a review last published in 2012.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of transurethral microwave thermotherapy for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

SEARCH METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search using multiple databases (the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and LILACS), trials registries, other sources of grey literature, and conference proceedings published up to 31 May 2021, with no restrictions by language or publication status.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included parallel-group randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster-RCTs of participants with BPH who underwent TUMT.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed studies for inclusion at each stage and undertook data extraction and risk of bias and GRADE assessments of the certainty of the evidence (CoE). We considered review outcomes measured up to 12 months after randomization as short-term and beyond 12 months as long-term. Our main outcomes included: urologic symptoms scores, quality of life, major adverse events, retreatment, and ejaculatory and erectile function.

MAIN RESULTS

In this update, we identified no new RCTs, but we included data from studies excluded in the previous version of this review. We included 16 trials with 1919 participants, with a median age of 69 and moderate lower urinary tract symptoms. The certainty of the evidence for most comparisons was moderate-to-low, due to an overall high risk of bias across studies and imprecision (few participants and events). TUMT versus TURP Based on data from four studies with 306 participants, when compared to TURP, TUMT probably results in little to no difference in urologic symptom scores measured by the International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS) on a scale from 0 to 35, with higher scores indicating worse symptoms at short-term follow-up (mean difference (MD) 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.03 to 2.03; moderate certainty). There is likely to be little to no difference in the quality of life (MD -0.10, 95% CI -0.67 to 0.47; 1 study, 136 participants, moderate certainty). TUMT likely results in fewer major adverse events (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.43; 6 studies, 525 participants, moderate certainty); based on 168 cases per 1000 men in the TURP group, this corresponds to 135 fewer (153 to 96 fewer) per 1000 men in the TUMT group. TUMT, however, probably results in a large increase in the need for retreatment (risk ratio (RR) 7.07, 95% CI 1.94 to 25.82; 5 studies, 337 participants, moderate certainty) (usually by repeated TUMT or TURP); based on zero cases per 1000 men in the TURP group, this corresponds to 90 more (40 to 150 more) per 1000 men in the TUMT group. There may be little to no difference in erectile function between these interventions (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.24 to 1.63; 5 studies, 337 participants; low certainty). However, TUMT may result in fewer cases of ejaculatory dysfunction compared to TURP (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.53; 4 studies, 241 participants; low certainty). TUMT versus sham Based on data from four studies with 483 participants we found that, when compared to sham, TUMT probably reduces urologic symptom scores using the IPSS at short-term follow-up (MD -5.40, 95% CI -6.97 to -3.84; moderate certainty). TUMT may cause little to no difference in the quality of life (MD -0.95, 95% CI -1.14 to -0.77; 2 studies, 347 participants; low certainty) as measured by the IPSS quality-of-life question on a scale from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating a worse quality of life. We are very uncertain about the effects on major adverse events, since most studies reported no events or isolated lesions of the urinary tract. TUMT may also reduce the need for retreatment compared to sham (RR 0.27, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.88; 2 studies, 82 participants, low certainty); based on 194 retreatments per 1000 men in the sham group, this corresponds to 141 fewer (178 to 23 fewer) per 1000 men in the TUMT group. We are very uncertain of the effects on erectile and ejaculatory function (very low certainty), since we found isolated reports of impotence and ejaculatory disorders (anejaculation and hematospermia). There were no data available for the comparisons of TUMT versus convective radiofrequency water vapor therapy, prostatic urethral lift, prostatic arterial embolization or temporary implantable nitinol device.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

TUMT provides a similar reduction in urinary symptoms compared to the standard treatment (TURP), with fewer major adverse events and fewer cases of ejaculatory dysfunction at short-term follow-up. However, TUMT probably results in a large increase in retreatment rates. Study limitations and imprecision reduced the confidence we can place in these results. Furthermore, most studies were performed over 20 years ago. Given the emergence of newer minimally-invasive treatments, high-quality head-to-head trials with longer follow-up are needed to clarify their relative effectiveness. Patients' values and preferences, their comorbidities and the effects of other available minimally-invasive procedures, among other factors, can guide clinicians when choosing the optimal treatment for this condition.

A Relevant Midterm (12 Months) Placebo Effect on Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Maximum Flow Rate in Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptom and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia-A Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the mid- to long-term placebo effect of the medical and instrumental management of male lower urinary tract symptoms. This is generally a long-term treatment strategy. Therefore, knowledge on the mid- to long-term placebo effect is of considerable interest. The paucity of data on this topic prompted us to investigate this issue in a meta-analysis.

METHODS

All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with the indication of benign prostatic hyperplasia and lower urinary tract symptoms containing a placebo- or sham treatment arm and with a follow-up of 12 months were eligible. The 12-month effect of placebo or sham treatment on the International Prostate Symptom Score (the quality-of-life question was not analyzed herein) and the American Urological Association Symptom Score and on the maximum flow rate was quantified.

RESULTS

A total of 25 RCTs with 10.587 patients were eligible. Twenty-three studies were placebo controlled (plant extracts: n = 4, 5α-reductase inhibitors [5ARIs]: n = 9, α-blocker: n = 5, combination therapy of 5ARI and α-blocker: n = 3, and intraprostatic botulinum toxin A injection: n = 2), and 2 RCTs with transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) had a sham treatment arm. At 12 months, the mean International Prostate Symptom Score improved by a mean of 4.4 points under placebo or sham treatment with a range of 0.7-6.8 points: plant extracts, -3.6; 5ARI, -3.4; α-blocker, -4.3; combination therapy, -4.3; botulinum toxin A, -3.9; and TUMT, -6.8. The mean maximum flow rate improvement at 12 months under placebo or sham was not relevant (+0.8 mL/s), yet there were remarkable differences between trials: plant extracts, -0.3 mL/s; 5ARI, +0.8 mL/s; α-blocker, +1.1 mL/s; combination therapy, +1.4 mL/s; and TUMT, +1.0 mL/s.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis demonstrates the mid-term placebo effect on lower urinary tract function, particularly concerning subjective improvement. The degree of the placebo effect varies considerable between studies even at 12 months.

Surgical Management of Male Voiding Dysfunction

Benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) is a common cause of voiding dysfunction. BPH may lead to bladder outlet obstruction and resultant troublesome lower urinary tract symptoms. Initial management of BPH and bladder outlet obstruction is typically conservative. However, when symptoms are severe or refractory to medical therapy or when urinary retention, bladder stone formation, recurrent urinary tract infections, or upper urinary tract deterioration occur, surgical intervention is often necessary. Numerous options are available for surgical management of BPH ranging from simple office-based procedures to transurethral operative procedures and even open and robotic surgeries. This article reviews the current, most commonly used techniques available for surgical management of BPH.

Placebo Medication and Sham Surgery Responses in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Treatments: Implications for Clinical Trials

Placebo medications and sham surgeries have long been thought to be inert treatments. These groups served as a threshold to which an active treatment should be compared in a randomized trial to determine the true efficacy of the active treatment. However, surprising changes in subjective symptom scores and objective measures of voiding have been demonstrated in numerous placebo medication or sham surgery arms of trials. The exact mechanisms by which these inactive treatments augment patient outcomes are not clearly defined and multiple theories have been proposed to explain the often pronounced response. It appears that urologic outcomes are particularly prone to these effects and the astute physician should keep these responses in mind when interpreting any trial on a new therapy.

To what extent are surgery and invasive procedures effective beyond a placebo response? A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised, sham controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

To assess the quantity and quality of randomised, sham-controlled studies of surgery and invasive procedures and estimate the treatment-specific and non-specific effects of those procedures.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL (Cochrane Library), PILOTS, PsycInfo, DoD Biomedical Research, clinicaltrials.gov, NLM catalog and NIH Grantee Publications Database from their inception through January 2015.

STUDY SELECTION

We included randomised controlled trials of surgery and invasive procedures that penetrated the skin or an orifice and had a parallel sham procedure for comparison.

DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS

Three authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Studies reporting continuous outcomes were pooled and the standardised mean difference (SMD) with 95% CIs was calculated using a random effects model for difference between true and sham groups.

RESULTS

55 studies (3574 patients) were identified meeting inclusion criteria; 39 provided sufficient data for inclusion in the main analysis (2902 patients). The overall SMD of the continuous primary outcome between treatment/sham-control groups was 0.34 (95% CI 0.20 to 0.49; p<0.00001; I(2)=67%). The SMD for surgery versus sham surgery was non-significant for pain-related conditions (n=15, SMD=0.13, p=0.08), marginally significant for studies on weight loss (n=10, SMD=0.52, p=0.05) and significant for gastroesophageal reflux disorder (GERD) studies (n=5, SMD=0.65, p<0.001) and for other conditions (n=8, SMD=0.44, p=0.004). Mean improvement in sham groups relative to active treatment was larger in pain-related conditions (78%) and obesity (71%) than in GERD (57%) and other conditions (57%), and was smaller in classical-surgery trials (21%) than in endoscopic trials (73%) and those using percutaneous procedures (64%).

CONCLUSIONS

The non-specific effects of surgery and other invasive procedures are generally large. Particularly in the field of pain-related conditions, more evidence from randomised placebo-controlled trials is needed to avoid continuation of ineffective treatments.

Minimally invasive devices for treating lower urinary tract symptoms in benign prostate hyperplasia: technology update

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) represents a spectrum of related lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). The cost of currently recommended medications and the discontinuation rate due to side effects are significant drawbacks limiting their long-term use in clinical practice. Interventional procedures, considered as the definitive treatment for BPH, carry a significant risk of treatment-related complications in frail patients. These issues have contributed to the emergence of new approaches as alternative options to standard therapies. This paper reviews the recent literature regarding the experimental treatments under investigation and presents the currently available experimental devices and techniques used under local anesthesia for the treatment of LUTS/BPH in the vast majority of cases. Devices for delivery of thermal treatment (microwaves, radiofrequency, high-intensity focused ultrasound, and the Rezum system), mechanical devices (prostatic stent and urethral lift), fractionation of prostatic tissue (histotripsy and aquablation), prostate artery embolization, and intraprostatic drugs are discussed. Evidence for the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of these "minimally invasive procedures" is analyzed.

Clinically and Statistically Significant Changes Seen in Sham Surgery Arms of Randomized, Controlled Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Surgery Trials

PURPOSE

Medication trials frequently involve a placebo arm to more fairly assess the efficacy of the study drug. However, benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery trials rarely include a sham surgery group due to the inherent risks associated with simulating treatment in these patients. As a result the placebo response to sham surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia is largely unknown.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We systematically reviewed the available literature to look for randomized, controlled trials involving endoscopic or intraprostatic injection benign prostatic hyperplasia treatments that included a sham surgical arm from January 1990 to February 2015. Studies that included an objective symptom questionnaire and maximum urinary flow at 3 months were included. Results were analyzed together with weighting based on study sample size.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded a total of 1,998 potential studies. After reviewing abstracts and full text articles 14 randomized, controlled trials were included in some part. An average decrease from 22.3 to 16.7 (-27%) was seen in studies of the AUASS (American Urological Association symptom score) 3 months after a sham endoscopic procedure (p=0.0003) with an increase in maximum urinary flow of 1.3 ml per second (14%, p=0.001) at 3 months. Prostate injection based studies at 3 months were similar with a decrease from 21.3 to 15.7 (-26%, p<0.001). Maximum urinary flow increased by 2.0 ml per second (23%, p=0.043).

CONCLUSIONS

Sham controlled endoscopic and injection benign prostatic hyperplasia interventions demonstrate a considerable and statistically significant change in symptom scores and maximum urinary flow, which is comparable to the response seen in medication trials. Future uncontrolled benign prostatic hyperplasia surgical trials should consider these findings when interpreting outcomes.

Microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia

BACKGROUND

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has been the gold-standard treatment for alleviating urinary symptoms and improving urinary flow in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). However, the morbidity of TURP approaches 20%, and less invasive techniques have been developed for treating BPH. Preliminary data suggest that microwave thermotherapy, which delivers microwave energy to produce coagulation necrosis in prostatic tissue, is a safe, effective treatment for BPH.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the therapeutic efficacy and safety of microwave thermotherapy techniques for treating men with symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction.

SEARCH METHODS

Randomized controlled trials were identified from The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, bibliographies of retrieved articles, reviews, technical reports, and by contacting relevant expert trialists and microwave manufacturers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomized controlled trials evaluating transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) for men with symptomatic BPH were eligible for this review. Comparison groups could include transurethral resection of the prostate, minimally invasive prostatectomy techniques, sham thermotherapy procedures, and medications. Outcome measures included urinary symptoms, urinary function, prostate volume, mortality, morbidity, and retreatment. Two review authors independently identified potentially relevant abstracts and then assessed the full papers for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently abstracted study design, baseline characteristics, and outcomes data and assessed methodological quality using a standard form. We attempted to obtain missing data from authors or sponsors, or both.

MAIN RESULTS

In this update, we identified no new randomized comparisons of TUMT that provided evaluable effectiveness data. Fifteen studies involving 1585 patients met the inclusion criteria, including six comparisons of microwave thermotherapy with TURP, eight comparisons with sham thermotherapy procedures, and one comparison with an alpha-blocker. Study durations ranged from 3 to 60 months. The mean age of participants was 66.8 years and the baseline symptom scores and urinary flow rates, which did not differ across treatment groups, demonstrated moderately severe lower urinary tract symptoms. The pooled mean urinary symptom scores decreased by 65% with TUMT and by 77% with TURP. The weighted mean difference (WMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) was -1.00 (95% CI -2.03 to -0.03), favoring TURP. The pooled mean peak urinary flow increased by 70% with TUMT and by 119% with TURP. The WMD for peak urinary flow was 5.08 mL/s (95% CI 3.88 to 6.28 mL/s), favoring TURP. Compared to TURP, TUMT was associated with decreased risks for retrograde ejaculation, treatment for strictures, hematuria, blood transfusions, and the transurethral resection syndrome, but increased risks for dysuria, urinary retention, and retreatment for BPH symptoms. Microwave thermotherapy improved IPSS symptom scores (WMD -5.15, 95% CI -4.26 to -6.04) and peak urinary flow (WMD 2.01 mL/s, 95% CI 0.85 to 3.16) compared with sham procedures. Microwave thermotherapy also improved IPSS symptom scores (WMD -4.20, 95% CI -3.15 to -5.25) and peak urinary flow (WMD 2.30 mL/s, 95% CI 1.47 to 3.13) in the one comparison with alpha-blockers. No studies evaluated the effects of symptom duration, patient characteristics, prostate-specific antigen levels, or prostate volume on treatment response.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Microwave thermotherapy techniques are effective alternatives to TURP and alpha-blockers for treating symptomatic BPH in men with no history of urinary retention or previous prostate procedures and prostate volumes between 30 to 100 mL. However, TURP provided greater symptom score and urinary flow improvements and reduced the need for subsequent BPH treatments compared to TUMT. Small sample sizes and differences in study design limit comparisons between devices with different designs and energy levels. The effects of symptom duration, patient characteristics, or prostate volume on treatment response are unknown.

Thermal ablation of prostate diseases: advantages and limitations

Both benign and malignant conditions affecting prostate gland are very common in elderly men. However, the conventional treatment of these conditions can be associated with significant side effects and complications, and less invasive treatment alternative has been always searched for. Because of the anatomical location and easy accessibility of prostate, many newer treatment modalities using thermal ablation have been applied to the organ. These include not only heating of the pathological tissue but also freezing. Some of such treatment techniques have shown to be effective and safe and been clinically used widely. In this review article, various tissue ablation techniques using temperature change applied to prostate gland are covered. Each procedure's advantages and disadvantages are compared and discussed.

Followup of patients with interstitial cystitis responsive to treatment with intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin or placebo

PURPOSE

We evaluated the longer term response in patients with interstitial cystitis who initially responded to intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin or placebo in a randomized clinical trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with interstitial cystitis who responded positively to treatment with bacillus Calmette-Guerin or placebo after 34 weeks of followup in a double-blind clinical trial were followed for an additional 34 weeks in an observational study to assess response durability. Outcomes at 68 weeks included a patient reported global response assessment, 24-hour voiding diary, and pain, urgency and validated interstitial cystitis symptom indexes.

RESULTS

Of responders to bacillus Calmette-Guerin or placebo in the clinical trial 38 continued extended followup in the observational study. A total of 12 (75%) responders who received placebo and 19 (86%) who received bacillus Calmette-Guerin considered themselves to remain moderately or markedly improved at week 68. Improved symptom outcomes were also generally maintained during followup in the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients who respond to therapy with intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guerin or placebo maintain improved symptoms for up to 68 weeks after the initiation of therapy. However, initial response rates are low and placebo responders demonstrated essentially the same durability of response as bacillus Calmette-Guerin responders. These results argue against the routine use of bacillus Calmette-Guerin in this patient group.

Microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia

BACKGROUND

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has been the gold-standard treatment for alleviating urinary symptoms and improving urinary flow in men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). However, the morbidity of TURP approaches 20%, and less invasive techniques have been developed for treating BPH. Preliminary data suggest that microwave thermotherapy, which delivers microwave energy to produce coagulation necrosis in prostatic tissue, is a safe, effective treatment for BPH.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the therapeutic efficacy and safety of microwave thermotherapy techniques for treating men with symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Randomized controlled trials were identified from the Cochrane Collaboration Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, bibliographies of retrieved articles and reviews, and by contacting expert relevant trialists and microwave manufacturers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomized controlled trials evaluating transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) for men with symptomatic BPH were eligible for this review. Comparison groups could include transurethral resection of the prostate, minimally invasive prostatectomy techniques, sham thermotherapy procedures, and medications. Outcome measures included urinary symptoms, urinary function, prostate volume, mortality, morbidity, and retreatment. Two reviewers independently identified potentially relevant abstracts and then assessed the full papers for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently abstracted study design, baseline characteristics and outcomes data and assessed methodological quality using a standard form. We attempted to obtain missing data from authors and/or sponsors.

MAIN RESULTS

Fourteen studies involving 1493 patients met inclusion criteria, including six comparisons of microwave thermotherapy with TURP, seven comparisons with sham thermotherapy procedures, and one comparison with an alpha blocker. Study durations ranged from 3 to 60 months. The mean age of subjects was 66.8 years, and the baseline symptom scores and urinary flow rates, which did not differ across treatment groups, demonstrated moderately severe lower urinary tract symptoms. The pooled mean urinary symptom scores decreased by 65% with TUMT and by 77% with TURP. The weighted mean difference (WMD) (95% confidence interval) for the symptom score was -1.36 (-2.25 to -0.46), favoring TURP. The pooled mean peak urinary flow increased by 70% with TUMT and by 119% with TURP. The WMD for peak urinary flow was 5.08 (3.88 to 6.28) mL/s, favoring TURP. Compared to TURP, TUMT was associated with decreased risks for retrograde ejaculation, treatment for strictures, hematuria, blood transfusions, and the transurethral resection syndrome, but increased risks for dysuria, urinary retention, and retreatment for BPH symptoms. Microwave thermotherapy improved symptom scores (IPSS WMD -4.75, 95% CI -3.89 to -5.60) and peak urinary flow (WMD 1.67 mL/s, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.34) compared with sham procedures. Microwave thermotherapy also improved symptom scores (IPSS WMD -4.20, 95% CI -3.15 to -5.25) and peak urinary flow (WMD 2.30 mL/s, 95% CI 1.47 to 3.13) in the one comparison with alpha blockers. No studies evaluated the effects of symptom duration, patient characteristics, prostate-specific antigen levels, or prostate volume on treatment response.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Microwave thermotherapy techniques are effective alternatives to TURP and alpha-blockers for treating symptomatic BPH for men with no history of urinary retention or previous prostate procedures and prostate volumes between 30 to 100 mL. However, TURP provided greater symptom score and urinary flow improvements and reduced the need for subsequent BPH treatments compared to TUMT. Small sample sizes and differences in study design limit comparison between devices with different designs and energy levels. The effects of symptom duration, patient characteristics, or prostate volume on treatment response are unknown.

A Temporary Intraurethral Prostatic Stent Relieves Prostatic Obstruction Following Transurethral Microwave Thermotherapy

PURPOSE

The Spanner, a novel prostatic stent, was evaluated for safety, efficacy and patient tolerance when used to relieve prostatic obstruction following transurethral microwave thermotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Following transurethral microwave thermotherapy and routine post-procedure Foley catheterization at 1 of 9 clinical sites 186 patients meeting study criteria were randomized to receive a Spanner (100) or the standard of care (86). Baseline evaluations included post-void residual urine, uroflowmetry, International Prostate Symptom Score and International Prostate Symptom Score quality of life question. These evaluations were repeated at visits 1, 2, 4, 5 and 8 weeks after randomization (Spanner insertion) with the addition of the Spanner satisfaction questionnaire, ease of use assessment and adverse events recording. The Spanner was removed after 4 weeks, at which time the Spanner and standard of care groups underwent cystourethroscopy.

RESULTS

At the 1 and 2-week visits the Spanner group showed significantly greater improvements from baseline in post-void residual urine, uroflowmetry and International Prostate Symptom Score compared to the standard of care group. The Spanner group experienced significantly greater improvements in quality of life at the 5 and 8-week visits. Patient satisfaction with the Spanner exceeded 86%. Cystourethroscopy findings in the Spanner and standard of care groups were comparable and adverse events associated with previous stents were rare.

CONCLUSIONS

The Spanner is a safe, effective and well tolerated temporary stent for severe prostatic obstruction resulting from therapy induced edema after transurethral microwave thermotherapy. It may be a needed addition to the armamentarium for managing bladder outlet obstruction in a broad group of urological patients.

An evaluation of the economic costs and patient-related consequences of treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia

OBJECTIVE

To compare the costs and effectiveness of treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), including watchful waiting, pharmaceuticals (alpha-blockers, 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors, combined therapy), transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT), and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study used a Markov model over a 20-year period and the societal perspective to evaluate the costs of treatment alternatives for BPH. Markov states include urinary symptom improvement, symptom improvement with adverse effects, or no urinary symptom improvement. For the analysis, patients could remain on their initial treatment, change to a different treatment, have treatment failure that required TURP, or die (all-cause mortality). We used published data for outcomes, including systematic reviews when possible. Costs were estimated using a managed-care claims database and Medicare fee schedules. Costs and effectiveness outcomes were discounted at 3%/year where appropriate. Men (aged > or = 45 years) with moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms and uncomplicated BPH were included in the analysis, and results were stratified by age. Outcomes include costs, disease progression, surgery, hospitalization, and catheterization time.

RESULTS

What is the 'best' treatment depends on the value that an individual and society place on costs and consequences. alpha-Blockers are less expensive than the alternatives, and are effective at relieving patient-reported symptoms. Unfortunately, they have little effect on clinical outcomes and have the highest BPH progression rate. Other treatments have lower disease progression and better clinical outcomes, but are more expensive and entail more invasive treatments, and/or more uncertainty.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment decisions are made using a variety of information, including the cost and consequences of treatment. The best treatment depends on the patient's preference and the outcome considered most important. alpha-Blockers are very effective at treating urinary symptoms but do not improve clinical outcomes, including disease progression, relative to other treatments. TURP remains the 'gold standard' for surgical procedures. The desire to avoid TURP or the 2 weeks of catheterization associated with TUMT might affect a patient's treatment decision when symptoms are severe. Therefore, more information about patient preferences and risk aversion is needed to inform treatment decision-making for BPH.

The long-term cost effectiveness of treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia

INTRODUCTION

Excellent treatment outcomes with long-term durability and few adverse effects are expectations of treatments for chronic conditions. The long-term cost effectiveness of newer treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), including high-energy transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) and combination pharmaceutical therapy, has not been sufficiently studied against existing alternatives. The objective of this study was to estimate the incremental cost effectiveness of BPH treatment alternatives.

METHODS

We employed a Markov model over a 20-year time horizon and the payer's perspective to evaluate the cost effectiveness of watchful waiting (WW), pharmaceuticals (alpha-adrenoceptor antagonists [alpha-blockers], 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors [5-ARIs], combination therapy), TUMT and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in treating BPH. Markov states included improvement in symptoms, no improvement in symptoms, adverse effects and death. We used data from the published literature for outcomes, including systematic reviews whenever possible. Costs were estimated using a managed-care claims database and Medicare fee schedules, and were reported in Dollars US, 2004 values. Costs and effectiveness outcomes were discounted at a rate of 3% per year. Men (aged > or =45 years) with moderate to severe lower urinary tract symptoms and uncomplicated BPH were included in the analysis, and results were stratified by age and BPH symptom levels. Outcomes included costs, QALYs, incremental cost-utility ratios and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. Sensitivity analysis was performed on important parameters, with an emphasis on probabilistic sensitivity analysis.

RESULTS

alpha-Blockers and TUMT were cost effective for treating moderate symptoms using the threshold of Dollars US 50,000 per QALY. For example, at 65 years of age, the cost per QALY was Dollars US 16,018 for alpha-blockers compared with WW and Dollars US 30,204 for TUMT versus alpha-blockers. TURP was the most cost-effective treatment for severe symptoms (Dollars US 5824 per QALY ) versus WW. Model results were robust to changes in costs and sensitive to the assumed probabilities, utility weights, extent of improvement and life expectancy. Nevertheless, acceptability curves consistently demonstrated the same alternatives as most likely to be cost effective.

CONCLUSIONS

Our model suggests that alpha-blockers and TURP appear to be the most cost-effective alternatives, from a US payer perspective, for BPH patients with moderate and severe symptoms, respectively. TUMT was promising for patients with moderate symptoms and the oldest patients with severe symptoms, but otherwise was dominated. Value of information analysis could be used to determine the net benefit of additional research.

Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Using Transurethral Microwave Thermotherapy and Dilatation with Double-Balloon Catheter

PURPOSE

To improve the outcome of transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia, we combined TUMT and balloon dilatation (BD) with a double-balloon catheter and investigated its effects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

For a short-term trial, 40 patients were divided randomly into two groups: 20 patients received TUMT alone, and the other 20 received TUMT followed by BD. The degrees of symptoms were graded according to the International Prostate Symptom Score and Quality of Life score, and the peak urinary flow rate was measured before and 10 weeks after treatment. A historic control study of 527 patients was also performed to evaluate the long-term re-treatment rate: 98 of the patients received TUMT alone, and the other 429 patients received TUMT followed by BD.

RESULTS

The symptom scores improved significantly in both groups. The peak uroflow rate was significantly increased in the group who received TUMT followed by BD (P < 0.01), whereas the change was not significant in the TUMT-alone group. Significant sustainability of long-term effects was more evident in patients receiving TUMT plus BD than in the TUMT-alone group, as judged by the higher proportion of BD-treated patients who required no further treatment during the 5-year study period in comparison with patients who received TUMT alone (66.3% v 28.6%, respectively; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined TUMT and BD achieves sufficient subjective and objective improvement and a sustainable long-term effect. We consider this combination technique to be useful for the treatment of prostatic hyperplasia.

Cooled transurethral microwave thermotherapy for intractable chronic prostatitis--results of a pilot study after 1 year

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the side effects, tolerability, and efficacy of transurethral microwave thermotherapy with urethral cooling (cooled TUMT) for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome in a prospective feasibility trial. Cooled TUMT, using the Targis system from Urologix, is an established treatment option for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with minimal side effects.

METHODS

Patients with intractable chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome and symptoms for more than 3 of the 6 months before treatment (National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index [NIH-CPSI] pain score of at least 8) were randomized to cooled TUMT at an intraprostatic temperature of either approximately 55 degrees C or approximately 70 degrees C. Tolerability, side effects, and efficacy were measured with standard diagnostic tests, including the NIH-CPSI. Subgroup analysis was performed to evaluate the effects with and without BPH comorbidity.

RESULTS

A total of 42 patients were included in the study; 39 patients successfully completed treatment and 35 completed follow-up through 12 months. The baseline versus 12-month mean NIH-CPSI score was total score 23.4 +/- 6.4 versus 11.5 +/- 10.2 (improvement in mean value of 51%), pain score 11.5 +/- 2.8 versus 4.6 +/- 4.9 (improvement in mean value of 60%), quality-of-life impact score 7.2 +/- 2.9 versus 3.8 +/- 3.8 (improvement in mean value of 47%; all P <0.0001), and urinary score 4.7 +/- 2.8 versus 3.1 +/- 3.0 (improvement in mean value of 34%; P = 0.0079). Treatment discomfort was within the ranges reported for patients with Targis-treated BPH. Two patients had reduced sperm motility. Side effects were minimal and transient, resolved spontaneously or with medication, and were similar regardless of treatment temperature or BPH comorbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Cooled TUMT appears to be promising for intractable chronic prostatitis with or without BPH. Longer follow-up and a larger trial are required to evaluate the fertility impact and longer term durability further.

Long-term pooled analysis of multicenter studies of cooled thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia results at three months through four years

OBJECTIVES

To determine the long-term efficacy of cooled thermotherapy in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms of clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia.

METHODS

A total of 541 men underwent cooled thermotherapy treatment in six multicenter studies in the United States, England, and Canada. Both fixed and random effects models were used to pool the data across the six studies. The treatment response was measured as the difference between the urinary tract symptoms at baseline versus those at 3, 12, 24, 36, and 48 months after therapy. The treatment response included changes in the American Urological Association Symptom Score (AUA symptom score), peak urinary flow rate in milliliters per second (Qmax), and quality of life (QOL).

RESULTS

The baseline measures were comparable across the studies. At 3 months, the AUA symptom score had improved by a mean of 11.6 (55%), Qmax by a mean of 4.0 (51%), and QOL by a mean of 2.3 (53%). These changes persisted with only slight attenuation through 48 months (corresponding mean changes of 43%, 35%, and 50%). These changes were highly statistically significant (P <0.0001 to 0.01). An improvement of at least 25% was achieved for the AUA symptom score and QOL by more than 85% of men and by more than 65% of men for Qmax.

CONCLUSIONS

This pooled analysis of six multicenter studies of cooled thermotherapy, involving 541 men, found highly significant improvements in AUA symptom score, Qmax, and QOL. The results were highly consistent across the studies. The improvements reflected changes from baseline values of 45% to 50% for AUA symptom score and QOL and 35% to 40% for Qmax at a follow-up duration up to 48 months after therapy. The level of improvement for all three measures remained high at 48 months, indicating that the response is durable.

Cooled thermotherapy for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: durability of results obtained with the Targis System

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the durability of benefit associated with cooled high-energy thermotherapy (cooled thermotherapy) using the Targis System with data extending to 5 years after treatment.

METHODS

At three centers in Canada and the United Kingdom, 150 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia underwent cooled thermotherapy with the Targis System. This was an outpatient procedure performed without general or regional anesthesia. Patients were followed up at 1 and 6 weeks, 3, 6, and 12 months, and yearly to 5 years.

RESULTS

Patients were evaluated at 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years after treatment (n = 132, 111, 90, 77, and 59, respectively). At these intervals, the American Urological Association symptom scores improved by 11.7 (57%), 12.1 (58%), 11.5 (53%), 10.1 (47%), and 10.6 (47%) points (P <0.0001 for each), the peak flow rates improved by a mean of 4.0 (57%), 4.0 (56%), 3.4 (48%), 3.3 (47%) and 2.4 (37%) mL/s (P <0.0001 for each), and quality-of-life scores improved by 2.6, 2.6, 2.5, 2.3, and 2.3 points (P <0.0001 for each). At least a 50% improvement in the American Urological Association symptom score was observed in 63% to 68% of patients available for follow-up at years 1, 2, and 3 and 50% and 51% of patients available for follow-up at years 4 and 5, respectively. Four patients required repeated microwave thermotherapy, 27 required subsequent invasive treatments, 1 permanent catheterization, 11 required alpha-blockers, and 1 antiandrogen therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Cooled thermotherapy with the Targis System produces durable improvements in symptoms, quality of life, and flow rates to at least 5 years after treatment.

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy: the gold standard for minimally invasive therapies for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia?

From all available minimally invasive methods for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) has gained a firm position as the most attractive option. Recent research has produced innovations in high-energy TUMT, including new treatment protocols, refined selection criteria, and monitoring of intraprostatic temperature. Furthermore, long-term results from randomized studies comparing TUMT with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) or medical treatment are now available. All these data indicate that more durable clinical outcomes and less morbidity can be achieved with TUMT, strengthening its position as a standard treatment for BPH. This paper describes the status of TUMT in the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms related to BPH, focusing on variations in the outcomes with different devices, the durability of treatment outcomes, morbidity, selection criteria, and cost. The relation of TUMT to medical management and TURP also is addressed.

Interstitial laser coagulation versus transurethral prostate resection for treating benign prostatic obstruction: a randomized trial with 2-year follow-up

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether interstitial laser coagulation (ILC) is as effective and as safe as transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). The treatment of choice for bladder outflow obstruction secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia is TURP. However, ILC is a less invasive outpatient procedure that may be as effective and safe as TURP.

METHODS

In a multicenter randomized trial at six U.S. tertiary care hospitals, we treated 72 men with bladder outflow obstruction secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia with either TURP (n = 35) or ILC (n = 37). The outcome measures were peak flow rate, postvoid residual urine volume, prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen levels, symptom and quality-of-life indexes, sexual function, and adverse event rates. Measurements were taken at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months.

RESULTS

At 2 years, the TURP patients had better median peak flow rates, but not significantly so (range 16.5 to 13.9 mL/s, 95% confidence interval for the 2.6 mL/s difference of -0.4 to 7.6). The median scores on the symptom indexes and quality-of-life measures were similarly improved in both groups. Of 37 ILC patients, 6 (16%) were retreated with TURP in the first year. Sexual function declined in the TURP group but remained stable in the ILC group. The adverse event rates were similar, although the events were more serious in the TURP group.

CONCLUSIONS

ILC compares respectably with TURP. Given the advantages of an outpatient procedure, similar results in symptom reduction and quality-of-life measures, and less severe adverse effects, ILC can be an acceptable alternative to TURP.

Use and misuse of the concept of quality of life in evaluating surgical treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms

OBJECTIVE

To investigate how quality of life (QoL) components measured by given instruments direct the QoL perspective in treatment studies of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODS

Computer searches were conducted in Medline, CINAHL and Psychinfo; MeSH terms covering QoL and surgical treatments for BPH and LUTS were combined for the search. The analysis was based on a framework linking components of QoL to patient outcome.

RESULTS

Of the 74 papers meeting the inclusion criteria, 48 were published in 1997-2001, showing the increase of interest of the topic. Most of the papers reported the change in QoL by a one-item scale, whilst only a few reported results from several of the components in the QoL concept. Some papers regarded the change in general health status or parts of health status as changes in QoL. Functional status and symptoms, and the bother of symptoms, were often regarded as indicators of a change in QoL.

CONCLUSION

These analyses show an increasing interest in measuring QoL after surgery for LUTS and BPH. In most of the studies analysed, the batteries of instruments selected were too narrow in scope to study the complexity of QoL. Most papers are based on instruments sensitive to change, but the reports do not distinguish the basic assumptions for understanding relationships important in QoL research and as a result, the reason for change is open to question.

Heat versus drugs in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

The improvement in symptoms and voiding function is greater with transurethral microwave thermotherapy than with drug therapy, and the associated morbidity is low. Transient urinary retention necessitating catheterization is of short duration after targeted microwave thermotherapy. The short-term effect of microwave thermotherapy can be improved by neoadjuvant and adjuvant alpha-blockade. Microwave treatment offers greater versatility than drug therapy, allowing patients with severe baseline symptoms and small prostates to be treated successfully. Medical management improves symptoms to a more modest extent than does microwave treatment. Finasteride gives comparatively small symptom and flow rate improvements and requires several months for the maximum responses. With alpha-blockers the onset of action is fast and side-effects reversible, although they limit their utility. Finasteride or alpha-blockers must be continued indefinitely to maintain improvements in patients with BPH, but they have a favourable safety and tolerability profile.

Rationale and assessment of minimally invasive approaches to benign prostatic hyperplasia therapy

Benign prostatic hyperplasia affects quality of life, with most patients complaining of symptoms related to urination. For this reason, successful treatments can be defined by (1) their effect on lower urinary tract symptoms, (2) their impact on quality of life, and (3) their ability to unobstruct the flow of urine through the prostate. Minimally invasive therapy (MIT), which includes transurethral microwave thermotherapy, water-induced thermotherapy, interstitial devices (eg, transurethral needle ablation), and interstitial laser treatments, offers physicians and their patients cost-effective alternatives for achieving a substantially improved quality of life at an acceptable level of risk. Evidence-based medicine indicates that MIT is safe and achieves significant symptomatic improvement. Compared with long-term medical management, minimally invasive procedures offer effective, well-tolerated 1-time intervention with lasting effects that can be achieved on an outpatient basis. This article reviews the options for MIT.

Morphological and biological predictors for treatment outcome of transurethral microwave thermotherapy

The proliferation of prostatic tissue as a result of ageing typically leads to prostatic enlargement, which often causes obstruction of urine outflow from the bladder, clinically lower urinary tract symptoms, detrusor instability, incomplete bladder emptying, urinary infection, and finally acute urinary retention. The first approach to therapy depending on the severity of the symptoms is usually medical management (phytotherapy, alpha-blockers, 5 alpha-reductase inhibitors) before surgical procedures are performed. The reference standard for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia is transurethral resection of the prostate, although the introduction of minimally invasive alternatives such as transurethral microwave thermotherapy has led to a new era in surgical management. Suitable patients must be selected carefully on the basis of individual parameters that predict a favourable result.

Minimally invasive therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia in the new millennium: long-term data

Over the last decade, a number of minimally invasive therapies have been investigated for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia. Most of these therapies use thermal energy to ablate prostatic tissue. The major common problem with all these new minimally invasive therapies has been the lack of long-term data concerning efficacy, re-intervention rates and side-effects. We present here the available long-term data on these alternative minimally invasive therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia and their current place in the urologist's armamentarium.

Minimally invasive therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia

Currently, 3 categories of treatment are available for men with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): (1) medicine, such as alpha-blockers and finasteride; (2) minimally invasive treatment, such as transurethral microwave thermotherapy and interstitial ablation using either radiofrequency or laser; and (3) surgical therapy. The 1990s have seen an explosion of transurethral technology to treat symptoms caused by bladder outlet obstruction secondary to BPH. Unlike surgical debulking procedures, the minimally invasive therapies attempt to treat patients without general or regional anesthesia, and even ambulatory procedures are performed in the office. Because of the demographics of patients with BPH, it is hoped that these minimally invasive options will relieve symptoms without any surgical complications and the side effects and compliance issues associated with medical therapy. It is important that urologists have a clear understanding of the clinical usefulness of these devices, so that the overall role of such treatment may be determined by science rather than marketing. Clinically, the degree of symptom score, peak flow, and quality-of-life improvement seen with all the minimally invasive techniques are similar. The techniques may differ in their ability to reach the maximum number of responders and achieve an acceptable duration of response, and the need for analgesia/sedation associated with each technique. This study will define the minimally invasive therapies and present the differences in catheter design and technique. The pathologic basis for these therapeutic options and the advantages and disadvantages of each will be discussed. Urologists must decide which therapy can be used in their office practice. The maximum numbers of responders and enhanced durability of the treatment can be achieved based on realistic expectations, proper selection of patients, and complete information on the potential of these devices.

Minimally invasive procedures as an alternative to medical management for lower urinary tract symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia

Data are reviewed relating to the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive transurethral microwave thermotherapy and medical management in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Recent evidence is summarized indicating more pronounced long-term beneficial effects of microwave treatment. alpha-Blockade, however, offers the advantage of more rapid action than microwave treatment. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant alpha-blocker therapy can accelerate symptom and flow rate improvement in patients receiving microwave treatment. Compared with medical management, microwave treatment possesses greater versatility, allowing patients with severe baseline symptoms and small prostate sizes to be treated with a high probability of success.

Targeted transurethral microwave thermotherapy versus alpha-blockade in benign prostatic hyperplasia: outcomes at 18 months

OBJECTIVES

To compare directly the efficacy, safety, and durability of targeted transurethral microwave thermotherapy with that of alpha-blocker treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

METHODS

In a randomized, controlled clinical trial, 52 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia received terazosin treatment and 51 underwent microwave treatment under topical anesthesia. The patient evaluation included the International Prostate Symptom Score, peak flow rate, and quality-of-life score before microwave treatment or initiation of terazosin treatment and at periodic intervals thereafter up to 18 months.

RESULTS

The mean International Prostate Symptom Score, peak flow rate, and quality-of-life score all improved significantly in both groups by 6 months. However, the magnitude of improvement was significantly greater in the microwave group than in the terazosin group. The significant between-group differences observed at 6 months in the mean International Prostate Symptom Score, peak flow rate, and quality-of-life score were fully maintained at 18 months, at which time the improvements in these three outcome measures were significantly greater (P <0.0005), by 35%, 22%, and 43%, respectively, in the microwave group than in the terazosin group. The actuarial rate of treatment failure at 18 months was significantly greater by sevenfold in the terazosin group. Adverse events were generally infrequent and readily manageable in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the initial onset of terazosin action was more rapid, the longer term clinical outcomes of targeted microwave treatment were markedly superior. The more favorable results in patients who underwent microwave treatment were maintained for at least 18 months.

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy v transurethral resection of prostate

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has been the gold standard for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia for three decades but is now being challenged by other approaches such as transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT). Comparison of these techniques must consider the functional, financial, and social aspects of each procedure. Because of differences in equipment, it is difficult to draw valid conclusions from the comparisons of the functional results of TURP v TUMT, but the two appear equivalent in relieving symptoms, although TUMT appears slightly less effective in improving flow. Preliminary data suggest that TUMT is less expensive than TURP, but more data are needed. Although high-energy TUMT is not yet on a par with TURP, it is a valid alternative for many patients.

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy: an alternative to medical management in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia?

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) is being increasingly considered as an alternative to medical management with alpha-blockers or finasteride in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH). Enduring clinical benefits have been demonstrated after a single 1-hour microwave treatment session under topical anesthesia, and the associated morbidity is low. Optimal results are obtained with the delivery of high thermal doses and accurate targeting of microwave energy. Extensive evidence from randomized clinical trials supports the safety and efficacy of both microwave treatment and medical management, but randomized trial data have only recently become available directly comparing these two approaches to BPH treatment. These data indicate that greater long-term improvements in symptoms, peak urinary flow rates, and quality of life are attained with microwave treatment than with alpha-blockade. Furthermore, the actuarial rate of treatment failure is markedly lower in patients undergoing microwave v alpha-blocker treatment. However, the onset of action of alpha-blocker treatment is more rapid. The principal limitations of alpha-blockade are side effects and lack of efficacy leading to treatment failure in some patients. The maximal effects of finasteride are modest and require a period of months to be manifested, although the side effect profile and tolerability of this agent are favorable. Neoadjuvant and adjuvant alpha-blocker therapy can accelerate symptom and flow rate improvement after TUMT. In contrast to medical management, microwave treatment is highly versatile, allowing patients over a broad range of baseline symptom severities and prostate sizes to be treated with a high probability of success.

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy: how does it work?

Although some authors have proposed that the favorable impact of transurethral microwave thermotherapy (TUMT) for benign prostatic hyperplasia has only a placebo effect, this idea is inconsistent with the findings of a number of sham-controlled clinical trials. Histologic and immunohistochemical studies have shown that the nerve fibers in the periurethral tissue are damaged or ablated by TUMT, and it appears that the heat affects the innervation of the smooth muscle cells. Among the nerves damaged are the sensory neurons of the posterior urethra, and this change might reduce the excitatory signals from the urethrodetrusor facilitating reflexes. Necrosis and apoptosis within a limited area also have been described. Thus, there is likely more than one basis for the therapeutic effect of TUMT.

Clinical results of microwave thermotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia

Transurethral microwave thermotherapy is a truly office procedure without the need for anesthesia for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia. Several devices have been developed. Continuous refinement of the procedure led to higher energy protocols and high-intensity dose protocols applying the heat-shock strategy. We report on the clinical results of these protocols. Symptom scores improve around 60%, whereas maximum urinary flow rate improve from an average 9 to 10 mL/sec at baseline to 14 to 15 mL/sec during follow-up. No significant differences have been shown between the outcomes with the different devices. Long-term data show satisfactory results after 4 years. Initial clinical results with the heat-shock strategy show results comparable to those of higher-energy protocols with decreased morbidity. Treatment morbidity of higher energy protocols is moderate and consists mainly of the need for catheterization and a higher percentage of retrograde ejaculation. To improve treatment efficacy, patient selection appears to be most important. Prostate size, bladder outlet obstruction, age, and prostate composition are of predictive value for treatment outcome. Further development of the treatment protocols and refinement of the urethral applicators might enhance outcome.

Transurethral hot-water balloon thermoablation for benign prostatic hyperplasia: patient tolerance and pathologic findings

OBJECTIVES

To determine the patient tolerance and thermal ablation pattern in human prostatic tissue after treatment with a hot water, catheter-based system.

METHODS

Twenty-seven men scheduled for surgery for symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia or adenocarcinoma of the prostate underwent water-induced thermotherapy. The patients were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups. Lidocaine gel was the sole means of pain control. The patients and an observer recorded patient discomfort during therapy. A Foley catheter was left in place until surgery (n = 13) or successful voiding (n = 14). Prostates were subsequently enucleated or removed, whole mounted, and examined.

RESULTS

Patients reported mild treatment discomfort, the level of which did not correlate with the extent of necrosis, balloon diameter, or water temperature (all P >0. 05). Distal penile burning was the most commonly reported discomfort. All 14 patients successfully voided within 12 days of treatment. Prostates were enucleated (n = 24) or removed (n = 3) at a mean of 27 days (range 4 to 120) after thermotherapy, except for a single adenectomy 17 months after therapy. Pathologic findings included periurethral hemorrhagic necrosis, with focal or extensive urothelial denudation and mild inflammation. The mean maximal depth of necrosis from the urethral lumen was 7, 9, 10.33, and 11 mm in groups 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The extent of necrosis was similar in all groups (P = 0.11), regardless of the water temperature; conversely, the balloon diameter correlated with the depth of necrosis (P = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

This system of tissue ablation appears to be well tolerated, and it produced consistent pathologic results.