Value of diagnostic ultrasound in patients with chronic scrotal pain and normal findings on clinical examination

Urological Examination Compared to Ultrasonography in Testicular Lump Assessment: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background General practitioners (GPs) often expedite indeterminate scrotal lumps for urological evaluation. While a scrotal examination by a urologist is crucial, ultrasound (US) has become a routine component of clinical assessment regardless of the clinical examination findings and the nature of the symptoms. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of clinical examination compared to scrotal ultrasound, even when the suspicion of cancer was low. Methodology A retrospective review of all fast-track testicular referrals seen in the clinic between January 2018 and January 2021 was conducted. Data on clinical examination findings, ultrasound results, and final diagnoses were analyzed. Patients for whom ultrasound scans were available before clinical examination were excluded from the study to avoid confounding the results. Results A total of 398 male subjects were referred for urological assessment, and 123 cases were excluded based on specified exclusion criteria. Two hundred seventy-five patients were identified who underwent clinical examination by urologists and subsequent ultrasound scans. Among 30 (11%) potentially malignant cases, 18 (60%) were confirmed malignancies. Sixty-eight (24.7%) cases were deemed unlikely to be malignant, and an ultrasound scan confirmed 40 (58.8%) cases as normal and four (5.9%) cases of unexpected malignancy. Ultrasonography confirmed 19 of 27 hydroceles (70.4%), 64 of 89 epididymal cysts (71.9%), and 5 of 9 varicoceles (55.6%). Of 51 epididymo-orchitis cases, 14 (27.5%) were confirmed. Conclusions Urological examinations demonstrated high reliability in most cases, with clinical diagnoses frequently corroborated by ultrasonographic findings. The results indicate that when there is no clinical indication for an ultrasound scan, it is more efficient to avoid unnecessary ultrasonography, as it can be time-consuming without providing additional diagnostic benefits. This underscores the value of thorough clinical assessment in guiding the need for further imaging.

Current trends and therapies in orchialgia management

The management of pain is a complex condition that will be encountered by most practicing clinicians. In the genitourinary community, testicular pain may be classified as acute or chronic. Initial evaluation of chronic groin and scrotal content pain (CGSCP) begins with a detailed history and physical examination to elucidate the presenting pathology. Multiple therapy algorithms have been proposed with no definitive consensus; however, most begin with conservative intervention and medical management prior to advancing to more invasive procedures. Surgical approaches may range from reconstruction, as in vasovasostomy for post-vasectomy pain syndrome, to excision of the offending agent, as in epididymectomy. This review seeks to focus on chronic pain in the genitourinary community and review techniques of pain management in the current intervention for orchialgia, as well as identify future methods of treatment.

Canadian Urological Association best practice report on chronic scrotal pain

N/A

Chronic Scrotal Pain

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic scrotal pain (CSP) is a common yet poorly understood condition, with significant impacts on overall quality of life. Many patients will have sought evaluation and management from multiple providers in an attempt to find a solution for their pain.

RECENT FINDINGS

Despite many emerging treatments for CSP and further understanding of the potential etiologies and pathophysiological basis of the condition, its natural history is poorly understood. It is also important to recognize the psychosocial impact of CSP and consider formal referral for psychological evaluation and treatment if the patient endorses significant psychiatric responses to pain. It is important to also recognize the neuropathic component of pain that may arise in patients with CSP. Neuropathic medications show promise as a narcotic-sparing pharmacological intervention. There are promising surgical options for CSP including microsurgical denervation of the spermatic cord. This article highlights the current best practice recommendations on the evaluation and management of chronic scrotal pain.

Chronic Testicular and Groin Pain: Pathway to Relief

The management of patients suffering with chronic testicular and groin pain is very challenging. With increased awareness of men's health, more patients and clinicians are open to talk about this complex problem that affects over 100,000 men/year. The pathogenesis of chronic orchialgia is still not clear, but there are several postulated theories. Treatment options include conservative medical therapy with NSAIDs, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, and narcotics. Surgical options such as targeted microsurgical denervation and microcryoablation can provide permanent durable pain relief. The goal of this article is to review and discuss the management of patients with chronic orchialgia using currently available literature.

Scrotal Ultrasound for Pain: Low Frequency of Absolute Surgical Indications

OBJECTIVE

To examine the results of scrotal ultrasounds (US) conducted for scrotal or testicular pain and review the pathologic findings of orchiectomies done for lesions that were suspicious for malignancy on US.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the indications and findings of all scrotal US completed at our institution from 2002 to 2014. If a patient underwent an orchiectomy for an intratesticular lesion that was concerning for malignancy on US, the pathology report was also reviewed.

RESULTS

There were 18,593 scrotal US performed, with 7,668 (41.2%) conducted for scrotal pain. Of the US performed for pain, 80.4% revealed benign or normal findings, and only 2.2% demonstrated a finding that is an absolute indication for surgery (intratesticular lesion suspicious for malignancy 0.8%, abscess 0.7%, torsion 0.6%, infiltrative process such as lymphoma 0.1%). For those patients undergoing an orchiectomy, 75% had malignancy on pathologic analysis.

CONCLUSION

The majority of the 7668 US performed to evaluate scrotal or testicular pain reveal normal or benign findings. A low percentage demonstrates a finding that necessitates urgent or emergent surgery.

What Can We Do for Chronic Scrotal Content Pain?

Chronic scrotal content pain remains one of the more challenging urological problems to manage. This is a frustrating disorder to diagnose and effectively treat for both the patient and clinician, as no universally accepted treatment guidelines exist. Many patients with this condition end up seeing physicians across many disciplines, further frustrating them. The pathogenesis is not clearly understood, and the treatment ultimately depends on the etiology of the problem. This article reviews the current understanding of chronic scrotal content pain, focusing on the diagnostic work-up and treatment options.

What is the Role of Scrotal Ultrasound Scans in Genitourinary Medicine?

The objective of the study was to review the indications for scrotal ultrasound scans and to assess the impact on patient management.

We therefore performed a retrospective analysis. Case notes of all males referred for a scrotal ultrasound between April 1998 and March 2001 were studied. Data were extracted for the following: age, presenting complaints, physical findings on examination, results of a full sexual screen, treatment, ultrasound result and the designation of the person requesting the scan. All data were tabulated and summated using ‘Windows Excel’ software.

One hundred and fifteen men were referred for an ultrasound in this period of time. None had an ultrasound more than once. Of these, 25 subjects could not be included as they either failed to attend for their scan ( n = 8) or their notes could not be traced ( n = 17). Twelve subjects were excluded as they did not fit the selection criteria ( n = 12).

Median age was 30 years (Range 19–61 years). The commonest reason for referral was testicular pain ( n = 43) followed by testicular lump ( n = 19). The commonest abnormality on examination was an inflamed epididymis ( n = 18). Forty-two of the ultrasound scans were normal. A testicular mass was detected in only five of the 78 patients (6.4%), of which one was a malignancy (1.2%). A direct referral to a urologist for further management was made in only nine patients.

Scrotal ultrasound for pain has limited impact on patient management apart from reassuring a worried patient. However, it remains an important investigation in the management of a suspected testicular lump.

Chronic scrotal pain caused by Mild Epididymitis:Report of a series of 44 cases

Objectives: Patients with idiopathic chronic scrotal pain are challenging to both the general practioner and urologist. In this study, we tried to recognize mild epididymitis as an underrecogniczed cause of idiopathic chronic scrotal pain.

Methods: We described a consecutive series of 44 patients with idiopathic chronic scrotal pain characterized by mild scrotal pain, mild to moderate tenderness of epididymis without abnormal swelling of epididymis. We obtained a detailed history and physical examination along with routine urinalysis and Doppler ultrasound to identify the characteristics of this new clinical entity.

Results: A consecutive series of 44 patients who were primarily diagnosed as "idiopathic chronic scrotal pain" came to our hospital. All had the sign of mild to moderate tenderness on the affected epididymis without epididymis enlargement. Doppler ultrasound showed the affected epididymis with normal size and no abnormal change. We treated them with antibiotics orally along with cessation of strenuous activity and all fully recovered from scrotal pain.

Conclusion: In this study, we recognized mild epididymitis as an underrecogniczed cause of idiopathic chronic scrotal pain. It was characterized by mild scrotal pain, mild to moderate tenderness of epididymis without abnormal enlargement of epididymis.

Chronic unexplained orchialgia: a concept analysis

AIMS

To conduct an analysis of the concept of chronic unexplained orchialgia.

BACKGROUND

Chronic unexplained orchialgia is a concept unique to men's health; however, clarity is lacking regarding the precise meaning of the key attributes of this important concept.

DESIGN

Walker and Avant's framework was used to guide this concept analysis.

DATA SOURCES

Literature sources included bibliographic databases.

REVIEW METHODS

Literature published in English from January 1970 to December 31, 2012 was reviewed. Thematic analysis identified critical attributes, antecedents and consequences of the concept.

RESULTS

Based on the analysis, a contemporary definition for chronic unexplained orchialgia is proposed, rooted in the concept of chronic pain. This definition is based on the concept analysis and the defining attributes that were identified in the literature. Chronic unexplained orchialgia is a subjective negative experience of adult men, perceived as intermittent or continuous pain of variable intensity, present at least three months, localizing to the testis(es) in the absence of objective organic findings and that interferes with quality of life.

CONCLUSION

This analysis provides a precise definition for chronic unexplained orchialgia and distinguishes it from other similar terms. This concept analysis provides conceptual clarity that can guide understanding and development of a conceptual framework, middle range theory, or situation-specific theory. Further exploration of this concept is recommended to uncover the influence of social, sexual and cultural factors.

The impact of color Doppler ultrasound on treatment patterns of epididymitis in a university-based healthcare system

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Evaluate the impact of scrotal color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) on epididymitis treatment patterns in a university-based institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1 January 1999 to 30 July 2005, 870 patients from a single institution were diagnosed with epididymitis. A total of 480 men met the inclusion criteria for acute epididymitis. Scrotal ultrasound was included as a part of the diagnostic evaluation in 42.7% of men. Ultrasound reports were available for review in 187 cases. Information regarding patient demographics, diagnostic evaluation, and treatment was reviewed.

RESULTS

Ultrasound findings consistent with epididymitis were identified in 69.3% of men. The four most commonly reported irregularities were scrotal wall thickening (84.2%), abnormal epididymal echotexture (74%), increased epididymal vascularity (72.9%), and an enlarged epididymis (71.5%). Scrotal ultrasound was performed in 67% men under age 20 compared to 36% men between ages 30 and 69. Patients presenting to the Emergency Department underwent sonographic evaluation 57% of the time versus 17.2% men presenting to primary care physicians (P < 0.001). Ninety-five per cent (194/204) of patients who underwent CDUS were treated with antibiotics compared to 96% (263/275) of those who did not receive an ultrasound (P = 0.78).

CONCLUSIONS

CDUS can be helpful in patients with a potential diagnosis of testicular torsion, however, the use of CDUS as a diagnostic adjunct in the evaluation of epididymitis is of limited value. Treatment patterns and antibiotic usage were not significantly altered by ultrasound findings at this institution.

Testicular microlithiasis: is it significant?

Previously considered to be a benign finding on scrotal ultrasonography, testicular microlithiasis (TM) is now recognized as a condition associated with the development of testicular neoplasia. Despite this the management of TM remains unclear. We review the evidence for this association and suggested management strategies.

Chronic testicular pain in adult men: an integrative literature review

Past investigations of chronic testicular pain provide a sparse representation of the men with this condition and lack key details to aid our understanding of this important men's health condition. As a chronic pain syndrome, more research is necessary to understand the phenomenon of chronic testicular pain and the pain experience of these men. This integrative literature review provides a summary of the current state of the science of chronic testicular pain in men, identifies the gaps in our knowledge, and provides recommendations to address this knowledge gap.

Pediatric chronic orchalgia

INTRODUCTION

Chronic orchalgia, defined as testicular pain lasting > 3 months and interfering with normal activities, is neglected in the pediatric literature. We describe our experience with the evaluation and treatment of pediatric chronic orchalgia patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Charts were screened to identify patients meeting the criteria for chronic orchalgia. Charts were further reviewed to record the history and physical exam, diagnostic tests, treatment and outcomes.

RESULTS

65/982 patients met the criteria for chronic orchalgia. Mean age was 13 and mean duration of pain was 8.6 months. Physical exam findings were normal in 46 patients (70%). 59 patients were managed conservatively with resolution (10/59, 17%) or a single visit (36/59, 61%) in 78%. 13/59 (22%) patients showed either minor improvement or no change in symptoms. 5 non-responding patients were managed by the anesthesia pain service; 4 received epidurals with or without additional oral pain medications with 3 experiencing significant pain improvement.

CONCLUSION

Conservative management of chronic orchalgia allowed symptoms to subside in the majority of cases. We recommend patients be treated with conservative measures for 1-2 months. If this fails, early involvement of the anesthesia pain service can offer treatment modalities such as epidural analgesia. Surgical management in the face of a normal physical exam does not seem to have a role.

[Special pain conditions in urology. Summary, literature review and suggestions]

The diagnosis of acute or chronic pain syndromes of the urogenital system can be verified and successfully treated by exact exploration of the patients medical history, the physical examination and a few image-guided or laboratory analyses Pain conditions which remain of unknown etiology even after extensive investigations are difficult to treat by the urologist alone. In cases where no causally determined morphological changes can be found or the alteration is disproportionate to the discomfort sensed by the patient, a multidisciplinary therapy strategy offers an approach to find a solution.

EAU guidelines on chronic pelvic pain

CONTEXT

These guidelines were prepared on behalf of the European Association of Urology (EAU) to help urologists assess the evidence-based management of chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and to incorporate the recommendations into their clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

To revise guidelines for the diagnosis, therapy, and follow-up of CPP patients.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Guidelines were compiled by a working group and based on a systematic review of current literature using the PubMed database, with important papers reviewed for the 2003 EAU guidelines as a background. A panel of experts weighted the references.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The full text of the guidelines is available through the EAU Central Office and the EAU Web site (www.uroweb.org). This article is a short version of the full guidelines text and summarises the main conclusions from the guidelines on the management of CPP.

CONCLUSIONS

A guidelines text is presented including chapters on chronic prostate pain and bladder pain syndromes, urethral pain, scrotal pain, pelvic pain in gynaecologic practice, neurogenic dysfunctions, the role of the pelvic floor and pudendal nerve, psychological factors, general treatment of CPP, nerve blocks, and neuromodulation. These guidelines have been drawn up to provide support in the management of the large and difficult group of patients suffering from CPP.

[Urethral and scrotal pain syndromes]

Painful diseases of the pelvis are not rare. Urethral and scrotal pains are part of the chronic pelvic pain syndromes along with chronic prostatitis and painful bladder syndrome/interstitial cystitis. The objective of this review is to update the current knowledge about epidimiology, etiology, diagnosis and best treatment for patients with urethral and scrotal pain syndromes. Epidemiological data for both syndromes are scant. We lack of uniform definition or readily available diagnostic marker and aetiology remains unclear. The pain could be a neuropathic without a specific stimulus or disproportionate to the stimulus intensity. Regarding diagnosis, there is no evidence to qualify or quantify the symptoms to include or exclude patients. Nevertheless, it is very important to know functional neuroanatomy in the evaluation of these patients. Treatment always should be primary conservatively. Surgery should be avoided if possible. As no specific treatment is available, decrease the pain is the main objective, therefore urologist should know how to manage analgesics, antidepressant and anticonvulsants.

Chronic scrotal pain syndrome: management among urologists in Switzerland

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Management of patients presenting with chronic or recurrent pain located in the scrotum is often very challenging. Evidence-based literature and clinical practice guidelines for the management of chronic scrotal pain syndrome (CSPS) are not available. We assessed the current perception and management of chronic scrotal pain syndrome by urologists in Switzerland.

METHODS

In July 2004, all the members of the Swiss Society of Urology received a questionnaire focusing on diagnostic and treatment practices for the management of chronic scrotal pain syndrome. The questionnaire consisted of 6 topics concerning practice setting, incidence, aetiology, diagnostics, therapy and treatment success rate.

RESULTS

103 questionnaires were completed (63%). All but 2 (2%) responding Swiss urologists see a mean of 6.5 new patients per month (range 1-30). 79% of Swiss urologists consider CSPS to be infectious or post-infectious in nature. Furthermore, a history of vasectomy, psychosomatic disorders, chronic prostatitis, neuromuscular disorders, a history of inguinal surgery, and idiopathic aetiology were mentioned in decreasing order. The most commonly used examinations are urinalysis in 96% and ultrasound in 93%. Additional assessments include blood sampling, duplex ultrasound, assessment for coexisting chronic prostatitis, and referral to an Orthopaedist, Rheumatologist or Psychiatrist. The predominant medication prescribed for CSPS is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent given for a mean of 15.5 days. An antibiotic trial is prescribed by 82% for a mean of 20.5 days. 74% consider epididymectomy the treatment option of choice in recurrence. Inguinal orchiectomy is performed by 7%, microsurgical spermatic cord denervation is performed by 6% of surgeons. Mean estimated recurrence rate after conservative treatment is 48% and thus higher than after epididymectomy with 18%.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic pain located in the scrotum is a common clinical condition in Switzerland. Most urologists consider an infection or post-infectious alterations as the predominant aetiology for CSPS. Consequently, an antibiotic trial in combination with an anti-inflammatory agent is prescribed as first-line therapy. Recurrence rates for conservative treatment are estimated high which is in contradiction to the presumed aetiology. Therefore, further evaluation of this poorly described disease complex is required.

[Chronic pain syndrome in uorology]

Chronic pain of the genital region remains a therapeutic challenge. Among men, symptoms are mainly related to the prostate, bladder and scrotal organs, and among women to the bladder and vagina. Only some of the cases demonstrate pathologic changes of the symptomatic organs requiring specific treatment. Among pain medications, peripheral analgesics are the most suitable. In the case of chronic pain, which can be classified according to Gerbershagen, a psychosomatic origin also has to be considered and needs to be evaluated. Analgesics are of minor importance in the treatment of psychosomatic syndromes but tricyclic antidepressants or anticonvulsants may be helpful. Relaxation techniques also need to be considered.