Safety and efficacy of adefovir dipivoxil in patients co-infected with HIV-1 and lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus: an open-label pilot study

Adefovir for lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B

Adefovir, a nucleotide analog developed by John Martin, was a major breakthrough in the treatment of chronic Hepatitis B. Prior to adefovir, Hepatitis B treatment was limited to two therapeutic modalities, either interferon, which carried significant side effects and was efficacious in a minority of patients, or lamivudine which showed no durable effects with short-term use and a high rate of resistance with long-term use. Adefovir was found to be effective in suppressing viral replication and in resolving the hepatic inflammation associated with hepatitis B with only rare instances of resistance. In this article, we appreciate John Martin’s contribution to science and medicine as we review the landmark trials of adefovir that brought forth a new era of treatment of Hepatitis B.

Telbivudine Plus Adefovir Versus Lamivudine Plus Adefovir for Lamivudine-Resistant Chronic Hepatitis B: TeSLA Randomized Trial

Background: In countries with unavailable tenofovir, a combination of lamivudine (LMV) and adefovir (ADV) is recommended for the treatment of LMV-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB). Considering that telbivudine (L-dT) was demonstrated to be superior to LMV in previous studies, L-dT and ADV combination therapy is expected to show better antiviral efficacy than the combination of LMV and ADV in patients with LMV-resistant CHB. Methods: This was a prospective randomized multicenter study. The primary endpoint was Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) DNA reduction after 52 weeks of treatment. The secondary endpoints were HBV DNA undetectability, hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion, the incidence of virological and biochemical breakthroughs, and safety during the study period. Results: A total of 43 LMV-resistant CHB patients were enrolled. Twenty-one were treated with LMV + ADV and 22 with L-dT + ADV. After 52 weeks of antiviral treatment, the HBV DNA reduction showed no significant intergroup difference (-4.54 ± 1.23 log IU/mL in the LMV + ADV group, -4.24 ± 1.46 log IU/mL in the L-dT + ADV group, P = 0.475). There were no significant intergroup differences in HBV DNA undetectability rates, mean HBV DNA level, or hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion rate at 13, 26, 39, and 52 weeks of treatment. In terms of safety, the mean creatine phosphokinase level was significantly higher in the L-dT + ADV group. Conclusions: In the treatment of LMV-resistant CHB, the combination of L-dT and ADV did not show any clinical benefit compared to the combination of LMV and ADV.

HBV/HIV Coinfection: Impact on the Development and Clinical Treatment of Liver Diseases

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a common contributor to chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Approximately 10% of people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) also have chronic HBV co-infection, owing to shared transmission routes. HIV/HBV coinfection accelerates the progression of chronic HBV to cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease, or hepatocellular carcinoma compared to chronic HBV mono-infection. HBV/HIV coinfection alters the natural history of hepatitis B and renders the antiviral treatment more complex. In this report, we conducted a critical review on the epidemiology, natural history, and pathogenesis of liver diseases related to HBV/HIV coinfection. We summarized the novel therapeutic options for these coinfected patients.

Performance of the Xpert HBV Viral Load assay versus the Aptima Quant assay for quantifying hepatitis B virus DNA

Quantification of HBV DNA is used for initiating and monitoring antiviral treatment. We have evaluated the Xpert HBV Viral Load (VL) assay on the GeneXpert instrument. We estimated its limit of detection to be 7.5 IU/mL. Reproducibility was 1.1-12.7% as assessed by the coefficients of variation for 3 different samples. The assay was linear from 2 to 8 log₁₀ IU/mL for HBV genotypes A to F. Its clinical performance was evaluated by testing prospectively 100 HBV DNA-positive samples with the Xpert HBV VL and Aptima Quant HBV assays. The results from the 2 assays were correlated, with a modest bias (-0.10 log₁₀ IU/mL) between them by Bland-Altman analysis. Patient monitoring with 80 samples performed with both assays gave similar patient profiles with trends in the same direction. The Xpert HBV Viral load assay is reliable enough for quantifying HBV DNA in clinical practice.

Comparative effectiveness of anti-viral drugs with dual activity for treating hepatitis B and HIV co-infected patients: a network meta-analysis

Background

There are randomized trials assessing a variety of antiviral drugs for hepatitis B virus (HBV), but the relative effectiveness of these drugs in the treatment of patients co-infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) remains unclear. The objectives of the current study were to estimate and rank the relative effectiveness of antiviral drugs for treating HBV and HIV co-infected patients.

Methods

Randomized trials, assessing the efficacy of antiviral drugs for HBV and HIV co-infected patients were searched in health-related databases. The methodological quality of the included trials was evaluated using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Main outcome in this meta-analysis study was the success of treatment by antivirals as determined by virologic response. We performed pairwise and network meta-analysis of these trials and assessed the quality of evidence using the GRADE approach.

Results

Seven randomized trials (329 participants) were included in this network meta-analysis study. A network geometry was formed with six treatment options including four antiviral drugs, adefovir (ADV), emtricitabine (FTC), lamivudine (LMV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), combination treatment of TDF plus LMV, and placebo. The weighted percentage contributions of each comparison distributed fairly equally in the entire network of evidence. An assumption of consistency required for network meta-analysis was not violated (the global Wald test for inconsistency: Chi²(4) = 3.63, p = 0.46). The results of estimates showed no differences between the treatment regimens in terms of viral response for treating HBV and HIV co-infected patients, which spanned both benefit and harm (e.g. LMV vs TDF plus LMV: OR: 0.37, 95%CI: 0.06–2.41). Overall, the certainty of evidence was very low in all comparisons (e.g. LMV vs TDF plus LMV: 218 fewer per 1000,121 more to 602 fewer, very low certainty). Therefore, we remained uncertain to the true ranking of the antiviral treatments in HBV/ HIV co-infected patients.

Conclusions

The findings suggest that the evidence is insufficient to provide guidance to the relative effectiveness of currently available antiviral drugs with dual activity in treating co-infection of HBV/HIV. Well-designed, large clinical trials in this field to address other important outcomes from different epidemiological settings are recommended.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12879-018-3506-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Molecular Mechanisms for Species Differences in Organic Anion Transporter 1, OAT1: Implications for Renal Drug Toxicity

Species differences in renal drug transporters continue to plague drug development with animal models failing to adequately predict renal drug toxicity. For example, adefovir, a renally excreted antiviral drug, failed clinical studies for human immunodeficiency virus due to pronounced nephrotoxicity in humans. In this study, we demonstrated that there are large species differences in the kinetics of interactions of a key class of antiviral drugs, acyclic nucleoside phosphonates (ANPs), with organic anion transporter 1 [(OAT1) SLC22A6] and identified a key amino acid residue responsible for these differences. In OAT1 stably transfected human embryonic kidney 293 cells, the K_m value of tenofovir for human OAT1 (hOAT1) was significantly lower than for OAT1 orthologs from common preclinical animals, including cynomolgus monkey, mouse, rat, and dog. Chimeric and site-directed mutagenesis studies along with comparative structure modeling identified serine at position 203 (S203) in hOAT1 as a determinant of its lower K_m value. Furthermore, S203 is conserved in apes, and in contrast alanine at the equivalent position is conserved in preclinical animals and Old World monkeys, the most related primates to apes. Intriguingly, transport efficiencies are significantly higher for OAT1 orthologs from apes with high serum uric acid (SUA) levels than for the orthologs from species with low serum uric acid levels. In conclusion, our data provide a molecular mechanism underlying species differences in renal accumulation of nephrotoxic ANPs and a novel insight into OAT1 transport function in primate evolution.

Circulating kidney injury molecule-1 is a novel diagnostic biomarker for renal dysfunction during long-term adefovir therapy in chronic hepatitis B

The aim of this study was to evaluate serum kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1) as a new diagnostic marker of renal dysfunction in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients receiving long-term adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) treatment.We retrospectively enrolled 85 patients treated with ADV and 85 patients treated with entecavir (ETV) monotherapy, for at least 6 months. The 2 groups were matched for baseline age (± 5 years), sex, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Serum creatinine, cystatin C, and KIM-1 concentrations were measured, and eGFR was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) creatinine-cystatin C equation, at baseline and last follow-up.eGFR decreased by 10-20% from baseline in 11/85 (14.1%) patients, 20-30% in 5/85 (5.9%), and ≥ 30% in 2/85 (2.4%) patients treated with ADV. Serum KIM-1 was more significantly increased after ADV treatment 86.53 (10.20-355.40) pg/mL than ETV treatment 61.54 (10.53-200.56) pg/mL (P < 0.01). Furthermore, serum KIM-1 was positively correlated with serum cystatin C (r = 0.47; P < 0.001) and negatively correlated with eGFR (r = -0.46; P < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC) of serum KIM-1 for identifying renal dysfunction in all enrolled patients was 0.94 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.87 to 1.02; P < 0.001), while the AUC-ROC of serum creatinine was only 0.82 (95% CI, 0.60 to 1.03; P < 0.01).Serum KIM-1 is a promising new diagnostic biomarker of renal dysfunction during long-term ADV therapy for CHB patients.

The 2015 Clinical Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of HIV/AIDS in HIV-Infected Koreans

The Committee for Clinical Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of HIV/AIDS of the Korean Society for AIDS was founded in 2010. The first edition of the Korean guidelines was published in 2011, and revised in 2013. The recommendations in the guideline contain important information for physicians working with HIV/AIDS in the clinical field. However, due to the rapid discovery of new data in the field of HIV and the evolution of the clinical environment in Korea, it has become necessary to revise the guideline again. This guideline aims to provide up-to-date comprehensive information regarding the diagnosis and management of HIV/AIDS in Korea. This guideline deals with issues regarding the initial assessment of newly diagnosed patients, timing of antiretroviral treatment (ART) initiation, preferred ART regimens in treatment-naïve as well as treatment-experienced patients and special populations such as HBV/HCV co-infected patients, or pregnant women. A brief summary of the revised guidelines and key changes to the original version of the guidelines are summarized below.

Comparison of lamivudine plus adefovir therapy versus entecavir with or without adefovir therapy for adefovir-resistant chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND AND GOALS

Data regarding the management of adefovir (ADV) resistance are still limited. The aim of this study is to investigate treatment outcomes of rescue therapy in ADV-resistant chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients.

STUDY

CHB patients who began rescue therapy due to documented genotypic resistance mutations to ADV between October 2006 and July 2012 were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients were included in this study. Most patients had history of lamivudine (LAM) resistance. Treatment response was evaluated at 3-month intervals up to 12 months. The cumulative rate of complete virologic response (CVR) in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected patients (HBV DNA<60 IU/mL) was 15.9%, 27.2%, 28.9%, and 31.7% after 3, 6, 9, and 12 months of rescue therapy. Thirty-five patients were treated with a combination of LAM plus ADV (LAM+ADV group) and 28 patients were treated with entecavir (ETV)-based therapy (ETV with or without ADV therapy, ETV±ADV group). The cumulative CVR rate was significantly higher in the ETV±ADV group than in the LAM+ADV group at month 12 (46.4% vs. 20.6%, respectively, P=0.040). Multivariate analysis showed that pretreatment serum HBV DNA levels at <6 log10 IU/mL (hazard ratio: 34.109, P=0.001) and type of rescue therapy (hazard ratio: 4.944, P=0.036) were associated with CVR.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower baseline HBV DNA level and ETV±ADV therapy were the important predictive factors for CVR in ADV-resistant CHB patients. This study suggests the need of early switching to a rescue therapy such as ETV±ADV at the time of low-level viremia.

Maintaining remission in lamivudine-resistant patients with a virological response to adefovir add-on lamivudine after stopping lamivudine therapy

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We examined the durability of the virological response after discontinuing lamivudine (LVD) in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with LVD-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV), who responded to LVD plus adefovir (ADV) combination therapy, and the outcome of switching to ADV monotherapy compared to maintaining combination therapy.

METHODS

This study enrolled 72 patients with undetectable viral loads (≤12 IU/ml) and normal alanine aminotransferase levels after ADV add-on therapy for at least 6 months in LVD-resistant CHB patients. The enrolled patients were randomly assigned to continue with LVD-ADV combination therapy or switch to ADV monotherapy (n = 36 per group). Virological rebound was defined as HBV DNA detection at more than 12 IU/ml by quantitative polymerase chain reaction determined on two consecutive measurements.

RESULTS

During 96 weeks of follow-up, 100% (36/36) of the patients in the LVD-ADV combination maintained group had persistently undetectable HBV DNA, compared with 94.4% (34/36) patients in the ADV monotherapy switched group. These two patients had undetectable HBV DNA after switching back to LVD-ADV combination therapy. There were no significant differences in the HBsAg levels between the two treatment groups during the 96-week follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, switching to ADV monotherapy resulted in sustained HBV DNA suppression in 94.4% of the patients for 96 weeks. Prior complete viral suppression with LVD-ADV combination therapy conferred a significant advantage in patients who switched to ADV monotherapy. LVD may be discontinued in patients who show a complete virological response to LVD-ADV combination therapy for at least 6 months.

Potential of acyclic nucleoside phosphonates in the treatment of DNA virus and retrovirus infections

The acyclic nucleoside phosphonates [HPMPC: cidofovir, Vistide; PMEA: adefovir dipivoxil, Hepsera; and PMPA: tenofovir, Viread] have proven to be effective in vitro (cell culture systems) and in vivo (animal models and clinical studies) against a wide variety of DNA virus and retrovirus infections, for example, cidofovir against herpesvirus [herpes simplex virus type 1 and 2, varicella-zoster virus, cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, human herpesvirus type 6, 7 and 8), polyoma-, papilloma-, adeno- and poxvirus (variola virus, cowpox virus, vaccinia virus, molluscum contagiosum virus and orf) infections; adefovir against herpesvirus, hepadnavirus [human hepatitis B virus] and retrovirus [HIV type-1 and 2, simian immunodeficiency virus and feline immunodeficiency virus] infections; and tenofovir against both hepadna- and retrovirus infections. Cidofovir has been officially approved for the treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis in AIDS patients, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (Viread) for the treatment of HIV infections (i.e., AIDS) and adefovir dipivoxil for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B.

Adefovir dipivoxil in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Adefovir dipivoxil (Hepsera, Gilead Sciences) is a prodrug of adefovir, with potent antiviral activity against hepatitis B virus. Adefovir dipivoxil therapy, 10 mg daily for 48 weeks, is effective in hepatitis B e antigen-positive and -negative chronic hepatitis B. In hepatitis B e antigen-negative chronic hepatitis B, adefovir dipivoxil was recently found to maintain its efficacy even after 3 years of therapy. Adefovir dipivoxil is effective in patients with compensated or decompensated chronic viral B liver disease, and in pre- and post-transplant hepatitis B virus patients who develop resistance to lamivudine (Epivir, GlaxoSmithKline). It is well-tolerated and safe even after the third year of long-term therapy, and is associated with low rates of viral resistance. All these characteristics make adefovir dipivoxil an important drug for the treatment of hepatitis B virus infection and an excellent candidate for long-term maintenance therapy in chronic viral B liver disease.

The 2013 Clinical Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of HIV/AIDS in HIV-Infected Koreans

While a variety of clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of HIV/AIDS are used extensively around the world, the implementation of such guidelines is not assured in Korea due to constraints with respect to the diagnostic tests and antiretroviral drugs currently available in the country. Consequently, the Committee for Clinical Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of HIV/AIDS of the Korean Society for AIDS was founded in 2010, and the first edition of the Korean guidelines was published a year later. However, due to the rapid discovery of new data in the field of HIV and the evolution of the clinical environment in Korea in the last few years, it has become necessary to revise the first set of guidelines. This guideline aims to provide comprehensive information regarding the diagnosis and management of HIV/AIDS in Korea. The recommendations contain important information for physicians working with HIV/AIDS in the clinical field. A brief summary of the revised guidelines and key changes to the original version of the guidelines are summarized below.

Prevalence of hepatitis B and C viral co-infections among HIV-1 infected individuals in Nairobi, Kenya

Background

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and Hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infections among HIV-1 infected individuals are growing worldwide health problems characterized by lack of effective vaccines, need for expensive treatment, chronicity of morbidity and associated mortality. Their prevalence and distribution patterns continue to vary across geographical locations with high prevalence being detected among high risk populations. To determine the prevalence of HBV and HCV among HIV-1 infected individuals, blood samples were collected from consenting study subjects visiting comprehensive HIV clinics in Nairobi during the period between October and December 2009.

Methods

Blood samples from volunteers were screened with ELISA tests for detecting HIV, HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) and anti-HCV antibodies.

Results

In a total of three (300) hundred infected individuals consisting of 129 (43%) males and 171 (57%) females 15.3% (46/300) were HIV-1 co-infected with either HBV or HCV or both, 10.3% (31/300) with HIV-1 and HCV and 6% (18/300) with HIV-1 and HBV infections. However, only three individuals (1%) were coinfected with the three viruses (HIV/HBV/HCV).

Conclusion

Though, low levels of co-infection with all three viruses were reported, there could be higher prevalence rates than reported here especially among high risk populations.

Systemic and Renal Pharmacokinetics of Adefovir and Tenofovir Upon Coadministration

Adefovir and tenofovir are nucleotide analogs that undergo renal secretion by the human renal organic anion transporter. The pharmacokinetics of tenofovir and adefovir following the administration of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and adefovir dipivoxil alone and together were determined in 24 healthy subjects in an 8-day, open-label, fixed-sequence study. Subjects received oral doses of adefovir dipivoxil on days 1 and 8 and oral doses of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate on days 2 to 8. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed on days 1, 7, and 8. The plasma pharmacokinetics of tenofovir and adefovir were unaltered upon coadministration. Furthermore, the renal clearances (CLrenal) of tenofovir and adefovir were unaffected by their coadministration. The plasma Cmax values of tenofovir and adefovir were 33-fold and 340-fold lower than their Km values for the human renal organic anion transporter. These results demonstrate that coadministration of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and adefovir dipivoxil does not result in substantial changes to their individual pharmacokinetic profiles.

Direct acting antivirals for the treatment of chronic viral hepatitis

The development and evaluation of antiviral agents through carefully designed clinical trials over the last 25 years have heralded a new dawn in the treatment of patients chronically infected with the hepatitis B and C viruses, but not so for the D virus (HBV, HCV, and HDV). The introduction of direct acting antivirals (DDAs) for the treatment of HBV carriers has permitted the long-term use of these compounds for the continuous suppression of viral replication, whilst in the case of HCV in combination with the standard of care [SOC, pegylated interferon (PegIFN), and ribavirin] sustained virological responses (SVRs) have been achieved with increasing frequency. Progress in the case of HDV has been slow and lacking in significant breakthroughs.This paper aims to summarise the current state of play in treatment approaches for chonic viral hepatitis patients and future perspectives.

Adefovir dipivoxil in chronic hepatitis B: history and current uses

INTRODUCTION

The nucleotide analogue adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) was approved in 2002 for the treatment of chronic infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV), in both hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and -negative patients. ADV 10 mg daily has been associated with improved liver histology, decreased levels of HBV DNA and alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and seroconversion of HBeAg.

AREAS COVERED

This paper reviews the use of ADV as a first-line treatment for chronic hepatitis B and as an add-on therapy in chronic HBV-infected patients with lamivudine resistance. In the years since its launch, clinical resistance to ADV has emerged, and tenofovir and entecavir have shown greater efficacy in reducing viral load.

EXPERT OPINION

Many patients who started antiviral therapy with ADV (either as monotherapy or in combination with lamivudine) remain on this agent because they have undetectable viremia, but its future use will probably diminish because of the availability of more potent drugs. ADV is generally well tolerated, though the 10 mg dose is associated with low risk of nephrotoxicity.

Antiviral therapies: focus on hepatitis B reverse transcriptase

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the etiologic agent of mankind's most serious liver disease. While the availability of a vaccine has reduced the number of new HBV infections, the vaccine does not benefit the approximately 350 million people already chronically infected by the virus. Most of the drugs approved by the FDA for the treatment of hepatitis B target the reverse transcriptase (RT or P gene product) and are nucleoside RT inhibitors (NRTIs) that suppress viral replication. However, prolonged monotherapies directed against a single target result in the emergence of viral resistance. HBV genotypic differences affect NRTI resistance, and because the reading frames of the S (surface antigen) and P genes partially overlap, genomic differences that affect the surface of the virus may also alter the viral polymerase sequence, function and drug susceptibility. The scope of this review is to assess the effects of HBV genotypic variation on the development of drug resistance to NRTIs. Some RT residues that vary among different genotypes are in the vicinity of residues that mutate and give rise to NRTI resistance. Interactions between these amino acids can help explain the effect of HBV genotype on the development of NRTI resistance during antiviral therapies, and might help in the design of improved therapeutic strategies.

Activity of antiretroviral drugs in human infections by opportunistic agents

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is used in patients infected with HIV. This treatment has been shown to significantly decrease opportunist infections such as those caused by viruses, fungi and particularly, protozoa. The use of HAART in HIV-positive persons is associated with immune reconstitution as well as decreased prevalence of oral candidiasis and candidal carriage. Antiretroviral therapy benefits patients who are co-infected by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), human herpes virus 8 (HHV-8), Epstein-Barr virus, hepatitis B virus (HBV), parvovirus B19 and cytomegalovirus (CMV). HAART has also led to a significant reduction in the incidence, and the modification of characteristics, of bacteremia by etiological agents such as Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase negative staphylococcus, non-typhoid species of Salmonella, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. HAART can modify the natural history of cryptosporidiosis and microsporidiosis, and restore mucosal immunity, leading to the eradication of Cryptosporidium parvum. A similar restoration of immune response occurs in infections by Toxoplasma gondii. The decline in the incidence of visceral leishmaniasis/HIV co-infection can be observed after the introduction of protease inhibitor therapy. Current findings are highly relevant for clinical medicine and may serve to reduce the number of prescribed drugs thereby improving the quality of life of patients with opportunistic diseases.

Treatment response and evolution of HBV resistance during lamivudine plus adefovir or entecavir therapy in patients with adefovir-resistant mutants

BACKGROUND

Here, we investigated the treatment response and evolution of HBV resistance during lamivudine (LAM) plus adefovir (ADV) and entecavir (ETV) monotherapy in patients with ADV-resistant mutants.

METHODS

Of the 53 patients with ADV-resistant mutants, 25 received combined LAM plus ADV therapy (LAM+ADV group) and 28 received ETV monotherapy (ETV group) for at least 12 months (median 24 months and range 12-67 months).

RESULTS

During 24 months therapy, no significant difference was noted in HBV DNA reduction from baseline, HBV DNA<200 copies/ml, hepatitis B e antigen loss and ALT normalization between the two groups. In the LAM+ADV group, patients with single rtN236T resistant mutation had higher rates of undetectable HBV DNA than those with the double mutant rtA181T/V+rtN236T at months 3-18 of therapy. No virological breakthrough occurred except for one patient with rtN236T resistant mutation who experienced virological and biochemical breakthrough after the emergence of an additional rtA181T mutant under LAM+ADV therapy. Of the 28 patients receiving ETV monotherapy, ETV-resistant mutants developed in 8. The cumulative rates of ETV-resistant mutations and virological breakthrough at months 12, 24 and 36 were 3.6%, 25.7% and 46.8%, respectively. ADV-resistant mutations were rapidly replaced by LAM-resistant mutations (median 12 months) followed by ETV-resistant mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in virological response between the LAM+ADV and ETV groups in patients with ADV-resistant mutants. LAM+ADV were less effective in patients with the double mutant rtA181T/V+rtN236T than the single rtN236T mutation. The incidence of ETV-resistant mutation was high in patients with LAM/ADV-resistant mutants treated with ETV monotherapy.

Telbivudine in combination with adefovir versus adefovir monotherapy in HBeAg-positive, lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B

PURPOSE

Lamivudine (LAM) resistance is common on lamivudine monotherapy for chronic hepatitis B. This study examined the safety and efficacy of telbivudine (LDT) given with adefovir (ADV) versus ADV monotherapy in patients with chronic, lamivudine-resistant HBV infection.

METHODS

An open-label, 96 week study with planned recruitment of 150 HBeAg-positive, lamivudine-experienced Asian patients with a confirmed YMDD resistance mutation, randomized 1:1 to receive ADV alone or with LDT. The study was terminated early due to difficulty in enrolling monotherapy patients. At termination, 42 patients had received study medication for 8-61 weeks. Due to incomplete enrolment, summary statistics only were prepared, without significance testing.

RESULTS

A total of 42 patients underwent rescue therapy (switch to ADV or LDT + ADV; n = 21 per group). Median treatment duration was 48 weeks in both groups. HBV DNA changes from baseline were greater in the LDT + ADV arm at all time points (Week 48: -7.4 log10 vs. -4.9 log10 copies/ml), and serum DNA was undetectable (<300 copies/mL) at week 48 in 38.5% (5/13) on LDT + ADV versus 0% (0/9) on ADV monotherapy Two patients (9.6%) on ADV monotherapy experienced virologic breakthrough without evidence of ADV resistance, but none on LDT + ADV; and no confirmed ADV resistance was observed in any on-treatment sample. HBeAg loss occurred in three patients on LDT + ADV and one patient on ADV monotherapy through week 48. Safety profiles were similar between the arms.

CONCLUSION

LDT + ADV combination treatment showed better outcomes against lamivudine resistant HBV than ADV alone, with a similar safety profile.

[Human immunodeficiency virus infection and viral hepatitis]

Hepatic complications currently represent one of the leading reasons for medical consultations, hospitalisation, and death in the HIV-infected population. This is due to a large extent to viral hepatitis, given its disproportionate frequency in this population. Chronic hepatitis B affects 5-10% of the HIV-infected population. Vaccination has reduced the incidence of liver disease related to hepatitis-B virus (HBV), and the availability of tenofovir has dramatically improved the prognosis of HIV/HBV carriers. Delta hepatitis affects around 15% of HIV-infected individuals in Europe harbouring positive HBsAg. It has the worst prognosis, given its accelerated course to cirrhosis and the absence of successful therapy. Lastly, chronic hepatitis C is the major cause of liver disease in the HIV population. Although classically linked to persons infected parenterally (i.e., intravenous drug users), outbreaks of acute hepatitis C among homosexual men have been reported over the last decade. Treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin provides a cure in less than 40% of patients. However, the introduction of new direct acting antivirals against hepatitis- C virus (HCV) (telaprevir, boceprevir) has revolutionised the field, as HAART did in 1996 in the HIV field, improving the prognosis of co-infected patients. However, interactions between these drugs and antiretroviral agents and the risk of selective resistance pose huge threats in this population.

Management of HIV and hepatitis virus coinfection

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Liver disease related to infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and/or hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality in those infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in this era of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Although progress has been made in the treatment of HBV and HCV in the setting of HIV-coinfection, there is a lack of data in certain areas and several aspects of the management are unclear at this time.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

Available data on the treatment of HBV and HCV infections, especially in the HIV-coinfected patient, are presented. Practical aspects of the management of these patients are reviewed, including diagnosis, treatment indications, monitoring, and toxicities. The impact of HAART on liver disease, end-stage-liver disease, and new therapeutic approaches are also reviewed.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

There are two modalities for the treatment of chronic HBV infection: interferon and nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI). The latter is the mainstream of therapy for HIV-HBV-coinfected patients. The double antiviral activity of NRTI requires coordination and careful selection of treatment for both viruses to avoid selection of resistance mutations and toxicity. Combination of pegylated interferon and ribavirin, the current standard treatment for chronic hepatitis C, has significant toxicity and limited efficacy in HIV-HCV-coinfected individuals. Oral anti-HCV treatments are currently under development and need to be studied in the HIV-coinfected population. Liver transplantation has a better outcome in HBV- than in HCV-HIV-coinfected patients. HAART seems to have a positive impact on the liver disease of HBV- and/or HCV-coinfected subjects but the CD4 threshold above which the benefit might take place is unknown at this time.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Anti-HBV treatment in the HIV-coinfected patient relies on the available NRTIs with activity against both viruses. Whereas HBV suppression can be achieved with this approach, toxicities and the selection of HBV-resistant variants result in challenging clinical scenarios. Current anti-HCV treatment (pegylated interferon and ribavirin) has limited efficacy in the HIV-coinfected patient, and STAT-C drugs are eagerly awaited.

Drug safety evaluation of adefovir in HBV infection

INTRODUCTION

Several nucleos(t)ide analogs (NUC) are available for the management of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). In most patients, NUC need to be administered on a long-term basis, thus increasing the risk of adverse effects. Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV), the first nucloeotide analog developed to treat CHB, may indeed cause nephrotoxicity.

AREAS COVERED

The pharmacokinetic mechanism of action, potential mechanism of renal damage and long-term safety profile of ADV in CHB patients have been reported. The current monitoring modalities, together with dosage adjustments, treatment of patients with ADV-related kidney impairment and the therapeutic algorithm in place at the authors' Liver Center are also summarized. Although, in short-term clinical trials, a daily dose of 10 mg of ADV was safe owing to a low rate of negligible nephrotoxic effects, the same dose may be associated with a usually reversible, proximal renal tubular toxicity as reflected by hypophosphatemia and elevated creatinine levels. Occasionally, Fanconi syndrome occurred in ADV-treated patients.

EXPERT OPINION

Renal function at baseline and during treatment should be carefully assessed in all patients receiving ADV to adjust the dose according to creatinine clearance, aimed to prevent or minimize nephrotoxicity.

[Long-term therapy for chronic hepatitis B in HIV co-infected patients]

As human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) are acquired through the same routes of contamination, the prevalence of HBV serological markers found in the HIV-infected population is approximately 7%. Liver-related mortality and morbidity is higher in HIV/HBV co-infected patients than in HBV mono-infected patients. Both viruses must be considered before a treatment decision is made. According to the European consensus conference on the treatment of chronic hepatitis B and C in HIV coinfected patients, treatment is based on whether there is an existing indication of anti- HIV therapy or not. In patients with no indication of anti-HIV therapy, drugs with dual anti-viral activity (lamivudine, entecavir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate) should not be used due to the risk of developing HIV-resistance. Interferon or adefovir in combination with telbivudine are recommended. In patients with an indication of anti-HIV therapy, a backbone of highly active anti-retroviral therapy should include tenofovir in combination with lamivudine or emtricitabine. The same regimen is recommended in patients who develop lamivudine resistance.

Extended treatment with lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil in chronic hepatitis B patients with lamivudine resistance

PURPOSE

We and others have reported that adding adefovir dipivoxil (adefovir) to lamivudine results in virological and biochemical improvement in cases of lamivudine resistance. The current study assessed the efficacy and safety of combined therapy after 104 weeks of combined treatment and analyzed the frequency of persistent lamivudine resistant HBV.

METHODS

A total of 78 patients with compensated CHB (Group A) were maintained on either adefovir 10 mg daily (n = 38) or placebo (n = 40) while continuing lamivudine. An additional 38 patients with decompensated cirrhosis or post liver transplantation (Group B) received lamivudine plus adefovir. The primary endpoint was HBV DNA response at year 2.

RESULTS

At week 104 of therapy, a significantly greater proportion of patients in Group A on combination therapy (76%) had a decline in serum HBV DNA to ≤10(5) copies or >2 log(10) reduction from baseline compared to those receiving lamivudine alone (13%; p < 0.001). Fifty-two percent of Group A patients on combination treatment continued to have the M204V/I HBV mutation compared to 92% receiving lamivudine alone (p = 0.0013). Virologic response occurred less frequently in patients expressing persistent lamivudine resistant HBV. In Group B, 87% of patients had HBV DNA response at week 104 (median change from baseline of -5.84 log(10) copies/mL).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of lamivudine and adefovir for 2 years generally proved effective in lamivudine-resistant cases, but there was a persistently high rate of detection of lamivudine resistant mutants and impaired virologic response in compensated patients.

Management and treatment of hepatitis B virus in patients with HIV infection: A practical guide for health care professionals

The management and treatment of HIV and hepatitis B virus (HBV)-coinfected patients present specific challenges for clinicians. The morbidity and mortality related to these concomitant infections are growing concerns, while the use of antiviral drugs effective against both viruses complicates therapeutic decision making. The present document provides guidelines for physicians regarding care and treatment of patients coinfected with HIV and HBV. Primary prevention of HBV in HIV-positive patients is achieved through appropriate vaccination schedules. Follow-up before treatment of HBV may include liver biopsy, screening for hepatocellular carcinoma and testing for esophageal varicies in cases of cirrhosis. In HBV-infected patients requiring treatment, recommendations regarding initiation, duration and choice of first-line drugs are made. Finally, in the case of resistance, appropriate alternative therapies are necessary.

Th1 and Th2 immune response in chronic hepatitis B patients during a long-term treatment with adefovir dipivoxil

Adefovir dipivoxil treatment has significantly improved the outcome of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. However, it remains largely unknown how immune system responds to the treatment. Chronic HBV patients were treated with adefovir dipivoxil and examined for serum HBV DNA loads, cytokines, and T helper (Th1) and 2 (Th2) cytokine producing T cells during 104 weeks of the treatment. Th1/Th2 cytokines producing T cells were significantly lower in chronic HBV patients as compared to normal individuals. Adefovir dipivoxil treatment led to the increase of Th1/Th2 cytokines producing T cells and serum cytokine levels in association with the decline of HVB DNA load. In contrast, Th1/Th2 cytokines producing T cells remained lower in one patient detected with adefovir dipivoxil resistant HBV A181T/V mutation. This study has established inverse correlation of the increase of Th1/Th2 immunity and the decline of HBV DNA load in chronic HBV patients during adefovir dipivoxil treatment.

Hepatitis B virus infection and renal transplantation

Although the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection has declined in renal transplant recipients (RTRs), it remains a relevant clinical problem with high morbidity and mortality in long-term follow up. A thorough evaluation, including liver biopsy as well as assessment of HBV replication in serum (i.e. hepatitis B e antigen and/or HBV DNA) is required before transplantation. Interferon should not be used in this setting because of low efficacy and precipitation on acute allograft rejection. The advent of effective antiviral therapies offers the opportunity to prevent the progression of liver disease after renal transplantation. However, as far as we are aware, no studies have compared prophylactic and preemptive strategies. To date, the majority of RTRs with HBV-related liver disease have had a high virological and biochemical response to lamivudine use. However, lamivudine resistance is frequent with a prolonged course of therapy. Considering long-term treatment, antiviral agents with a high genetic barrier to resistance and lack of nephrotoxicity are suggested. The optimal strategy in RTRs with HBV infection remains to be established in the near future.

Hepatitis B in HIV: available treatment options and approach to therapy

In the past 5 years, three new drugs were approved for hepatitis B, bringing the total number of therapies to five nucleos(-t)ide analogues and two interferons. Some of these drugs are also active against HIV. As the complexity of hepatitis B treatment increases, it becomes important for practitioners to be familiar with the potency, resistance patterns, and response rates for each hepatitis B agent. In this article, the efficacy in HIV and the best regimens for coinfected patients are discussed for those needing treatment for both infections. A particular emphasis is placed on cross-resistance among hepatitis B drugs.

Current therapeutic strategies for recurrent hepatitis B virus infection after liver transplantation

Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver disease is the leading indication for liver transplantation (LT) in Asia, especially in China. With the introduction of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and oral antiviral drugs, the recurrent HBV infection rate after LT has been evidently reduced. However, complete eradication of recurrent HBV infection after LT is almost impossible. Recurrent graft infection may lead to rapid disease progression and is a frequent cause of death within the first year after LT. At present, the availability of new oral medications, especially nucleoside or nucleotide analogues such as adefovir dipivoxil, entecavir and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, further strengthens our ability to treat recurrent HBV infection after LT. Moreover, since combined treatment with HBIG and antiviral agents after liver re-transplantation may play an important role in improving the prognosis of recurrent HBV infection, irreversible graft dysfunction secondary to recurrent HBV infection in spite of oral medications should no longer be considered an absolute contraindication for liver re-transplantation. Published reviews focusing on the therapeutic strategies for recurrent HBV infection after LT are very limited. In this article, the current therapeutic strategies for recurrent HBV infection after LT and evolving new trends are reviewed to guide clinical doctors to choose an optimal treatment plan in different clinical settings.

Evolution of full-length HBV sequences in chronic hepatitis B patients with sequential lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil resistance

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The aim of this study was to determine the evolution of full-length hepatitis B virus (HBV) sequences in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients with sequential lamivudine (LAM) and adefovir (ADV) resistance.

METHODS

The full-length genomes of HBV were sequenced from 11 CHB patients before LAM treatment and at the emergence of LAM- and ADV-resistant HBV.

RESULTS

Besides the known LAM-resistant polymerase gene mutations, 10 of 11 patients who had LAM-resistant HBV variants had additional amino acid changes in the reverse transcriptase (RT) domain, and ADV therapy reversed these additional changes to pre-LAM therapy status. Furthermore, new amino acid changes in the RT domain, distinct from the known ADV-resistant HBV variants, were selected at the emergence of ADV resistance in six of 11 patients. Seven patients had amino acid changes within the known T-cell or B-cell epitopes of HBV surface and core antigens at the emergence of LAM and/or ADV resistance. The frequency of pre-S deletions between nucleotide 3037-56 was higher at the emergence of ADV resistance compared with that at the emergence of LAM resistance (7/11 vs. 1/11; p=0.024). Combined LAM-ADV resistance was detected in one of 11 patients. This patient had resistant mutations to both drugs on the same viral genome by molecular cloning (5/24 polymerase gene clones).

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to the known LAM- and ADV-resistant mutations accompanying the emergence of LAM and ADV resistance, the changes of nucleotide or amino acid sequences occurred commonly in the HBV surface antigen or RT domain and were scattered along the full-length HBV genomes.

Frequent hepatitis B virus rebound among HIV-hepatitis B virus-coinfected patients following antiretroviral therapy interruption

BACKGROUND

The impact of antiretroviral therapy (ART) interruption in HIV-hepatitis B virus (HBV)-coinfected patients was examined in the Strategic Management of AntiRetroviral Therapy (SMART) study.

METHODS

Plasma HBV DNA was measured in all hepatitis B surface antigen-positive (HBV-positive) participants at baseline, and at months 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12.

RESULTS

Among HBV-positive participants in the ART interruption (drug conservation) (n = 72) and ART continuation (virological suppression) (n = 62) arms, HBV DNA rebound of more than 1 log from baseline at months 1-4 was seen in 31-33% (P = 0.003) and 3-4% (P = 0.017), respectively. Thirteen HBV-positive participants had HBV DNA rebound of more than 3 log, including 12 in the drug conservation arm, of which eight were on tenofovir-containing regimens. Factors independently associated with a HBV DNA rebound were drug conservation arm (P = 0.0002), nondetectable HBV DNA at baseline (P = 0.007), and black race (P = 0.03). Time to ART reinitiation was shorter (7.5, 15.6, and 17.8 months; P < 0.0001) and proportion reinitiating greater (62.5, 46.5, and 39.7%; P = 0.0002) among HBV-positive participants as compared with hepatitis C virus-positive and non-HBV/hepatitis C virus participants in the drug conservation arm. No hepatic decompensation events occurred among HBV-positive participants in either arm.

CONCLUSION

HBV DNA rebound following ART interruption is common and may be associated with accelerated immune deficiency in HIV-HBV-coinfected patients.

rtE218G, a novel hepatitis B virus mutation with resistance to adefovir dipivoxil in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Antiviral therapy is a potentially successful approach for the treatment of patients with Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. One antiviral agent is the nucleoside analogue adefovir dipivoxil (ADV). Its efficiency is compromised by the emergence of drug-resistant HBV mutants. Although three major ADV-resistant mutations of HBV are known, rtA181T/V and rtN236T, HBV mutations associated with ADV resistance have not been fully identified. We analyzed DNA sequences that covered a 244 base pair region of the HBV polymerase gene from patients with clinical manifestations of ADV resistance. A novel pattern of amino acid substitutions in HBV polymerase was detected in 26 out of 86 patients. This mutant exhibited a substitution of glycine for glutamic acid at residue 218 (rtE218G). Transient transfection of the HBV replication-competent construct including the rtE218G mutation was performed in HepG2 cells in order to determine the relevance of this mutation to ADV resistance. Phenotypic analyses demonstrated that the rtE218G mutation could independently confer resistance to ADV in vitro, with a 50% inhibitory concentration (IC(50)) 5.5-fold higher than wild-type HBV. RtE218G-mutated HBV also showed a decreased replication capacity in vitro, equal to 87% of wild-type HBV. The present study showed that the rtE218G mutation may be a novel ADV-resistant mutation. Further work will focus on resistance surveillance and cross-resistance analyses, and the molecular mechanisms involved.

Does RNA interference provide new hope for control of chronic hepatitis B infection?

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a global human health problem, with an estimated 350 million people having chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection worldwide. The majority of infections acquired during adulthood are resolved without intervention; however, infections acquired at birth or during early childhood have a 90% chance of progressing to CHB, leading to a host of adverse effects on the liver, including cirrhosis and cancer. CHB is currently treated with a combination of cytokines and/or nucleoside/nucleotide analogues; however, adverse side effects to cytokine therapy and the selection of resistance mutations to nucleoside analogues often abrogate the efficacy of treatment. The recent discovery that small interfering RNA and microRNA are active in mammalian cells suggests it might be possible to supplement existing HBV therapies with small RNA-based therapeutic(s).

Doctor-to-patient transmission of Hepatitis B virus: the potential of antiviral therapy for prevention

Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected health-care workers (HCWs) have infected patients during medical procedures. In many countries HBV-infected HCWs are restricted in performing exposure prone procedures based on either HBeAg status or serum HBV DNA level. To prevent loss of skilled HCWs and to minimize transmission risk, highly viraemic HCWs can be offered antiviral therapy. Nucleoside analogues have proven to be effective in reducing transmission of HIV and HBV in the setting of vertical mother-to-infant transmission. Following the same rationale, suppression of viral load in HBV-infected HCWs could minimize the risk of doctor-to-patient transmission to such an extent that job modifications are no longer indicated. To limit the risk of drug resistance, the use of combination therapy is advocated. We describe two chronic HBV-infected HCWs treated with antiviral therapy, eventually leading to well-tolerated and highly effective combination therapy with lamivudine and tenofovir, with continuation of medical practice.

Impact of hepatitis B virus genotypes and surface antigen variants on the performance of HBV real time PCR quantification

Quantitative PCR assays used to monitor hepatitis B virus (HBV) load differ in their ability to detect different HBV variants. This study evaluated the performance of the Abbott RT PCR assay for quantitating DNA from different HBV genotypes and from HBV variants bearing HBsAg gene mutations. The study was performed on a randomly-selected sample with a viral load >6logIU/mL for each genotype and on 25 HBsAg variants. Each sample was assayed using the Abbott RT assay and with the Roche Cobas AmpliPrep-Cobas TaqMan as a reference method. All HBV genotypes were detected with the Abbott RT assay with an equivalent dynamic range (1-8logIU/mL). For each genotype, the data suggest that the assay was linear over the entire dilution range (r(2): 0.985-0.995). For the 25 HBsAg variants, viral titres determined with the two assays correlated well (r(2): 0.929). The mean difference between the two methods was -0.295 (95% CI: -0.520 to -0.071). The difference was lower than 1log unit in all but two cases. In conclusion, the Abbott RT assay can detect and quantify DNA from different HBV variants with equivalent performance and is thus suitable for routine monitoring of patients with chronic HBV infections.

Hepatitis B and human immunodeficiency virus coinfection

Coinfection with human immunodeficiency virus-1 (HIV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) is common; worldwide, an estimated 10% of HIV-infected persons have chronic hepatitis B. Because the incidence of traditional acquired immunodeficiency syndrome-related opportunistic infections has decreased with successful anti-HIV therapy, liver disease has emerged as a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected individuals. HIV infection negatively impacts all phases of the natural history of hepatitis B leading to increased rates of persistent infection, higher HBV DNA levels, lower rates of hepatitis B e antigen loss, increased cirrhosis and liver-related mortality, and increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma at lower CD4+ T cell counts. The management of hepatitis B in HIV infection is complicated by the dual activity of several nucleoside analogs, the more rapid development of lamivudine-resistant HBV in patients who are HIV-positive, and the paucity of studies in this population. Until further research emerges on the optimal treatment for this population, data from HBV monoinfected persons will need to be extrapolated to the HIV-HBV coinfected population. Further research is also needed to determine the mechanism(s) for the increased liver disease progression and optimal treatment goals.

Association of lamivudine-resistant mutational patterns with the antiviral effect of adefovir in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Adefovir has a potent antiviral activity as a rescue treatment against lamivudine-resistant strains. The aim of this study was to assess the patterns of lamivudine-resistant mutations and their influence on the virologic response to adefovir rescue therapy in patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B. Sixty-seven patients with lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B were treated with adefovir monotherapy. Baseline blood samples were analyzed for lamivudine-resistant mutations via restriction fragment mass polymorphism. Virologic responses, ALT normalization and loss of HBeAg were assessed. Serum HBV DNA levels were measured using real-time PCR at baseline and 24 weeks of adefovir therapy. Of the 67 patients with chronic hepatitis B, 65 patients (97%) had lamivudine-resistant mutations in the YMDD motif [27 (41%) rtM204I, 22 (34%) rtM204V, and 16 (25%) rtM204I/V]. In addition to the YMDD mutations, the rtL180M, rtL80I, and rtV173L mutations were also present in 78%, 43%, and 11% of patients, respectively. The rtM204V mutation always accompanied rtL180M, and rtL80I was always observed in conjunction with rtM204I. Decrease in mean serum HBV did not differ between patients carrying the rtM204I versus rtM204V mutant at week 24 (-3.3 vs. -3.3 log(10) copies/ml, respectively; P = 0.303). The presence of the rtL180M, rtL80I, and rtV173L did not significantly affect viral load reduction during adefovir administration. These results demonstrate that the rtL80I mutant is co-selected with rtM204I as a compensatory mutation in the same manner as rtL180M with rtM204V, and that adefovir shows similar antiviral efficacy against all of the evaluated patterns of lamivudine-resistant HBV mutations.

[Nucleoside and nucleotide analogs in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B]

At least 4 nucleos(t)ide analogs have been approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil, entecavir, and telbivudine. The introduction of these drugs has radically changed the treatment of this disease. The advantages of these drugs are their oral administration, excellent tolerability and efficacy in all types of chronic hepatitis B (compensated and decompensated disease). The limitations are the need for prolonged treatments, which hampers adherence and can cause selection of HBV strains resistant to distinct drugs. The resistance rate differs for each of the drugs. Nucleotide analogs such as adefovir and tenofovir are useful in patients resistant to nucleoside analogs such as lamivudine, entecavir and telbivudine and vice versa. In cases of resistance to one of these drugs, combined treatment is advised.

[Treatment of chronic hepatitis B in HIV co-infected patients]

Because of complex interactions between HIV, hepatitis B virus (HBV), immune system and antiretrovirals, treatment of HBV infection in HIV population should consider both viruses. In co-infected patients with no indication of antiretrovirals, drugs with dual activity against HBV and HIV are not recommended to avoid development of HIV resistance (lamivudine, emtricitabine, entecavir, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate). Adefovir dipivoxil or pegylated interferon may be used. Telbivudine may have a role in combination with adefovir dipivoxil in this situation. In patients with an indication of antiretroviral therapy, regimens should include tenofovir in association with lamivudine or emtricitabine. In patients who had developed HBV lamivudine (or emtricitabine) resistance addition of tenofovir to antiretroviral regimen including maintenance of lamivudine or emtricitabine is the preferred choice.