Effect of nicorandil on coronary events in patients with stable angina: the Impact Of Nicorandil in Angina (IONA) randomised trial

An updated review on therapeutic strategies in coronary microvascular dysfunction

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is well-known cause of angina, yet treatment options remain limited. This systematic review and meta-analysis examines the current literature and provides a contemporary evaluation of treatments using a stringent definition for CMD with accurate methods of microvascular assessment in accordance with recent consensus guidelines. Methods and Results: A search strategy was conducted independently by two authors (CK and RR). Studies were required to be prospective trials in adult patients with documented CMD by IC doppler wire, thermodilution techniques, or perfusion imaging via PET/MRI. CMD was defined as either coronary flow reserve (CFR)/myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) < 2.5, and/or index of microvascular resistance (IMR) > 25. Methodological quality of studies was assessed via the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The primary and secondary endpoints were change in CFR/MPR/IMR and change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) scores respectively. Two-sided p-values were used and considered significant if p < 0.05. A total of 11,360 records were identified, from which 14 were included in this review covering 9 different treatments. Two treatments (quinapril and ranolazine) showed significant improvement in both CFR and angina. Three ranolazine trials were pooled in meta-analysis. The standardised mean difference showed a weak positive effect (0.24) with wide intervals (-0.21 to 0.26) which was not statistically significant (p = 0.20). We subsequently reviewed all treatments as mentioned in recent European consensus statements. Conclusions: The overall quality of evidence surrounding treatments for CMD is of "low", with lack of robust data highlighting the dire need for higher quality trials in this area.

Patient-centric no-option refractory angina management: establishing comprehensive angina relief (CARE) clinics

INTRODUCTION

Refractory angina (RA) is a debilitating condition characterized by persistent angina despite optimized medical therapy and limited options for further revascularization, leading to diminished quality of life and increased healthcare utilization. The RA patient population is rapidly expanding with significant unmet needs. Specialty clinics should be developed to focus on the long-term efficacy and safety of clinically available and novel treatment strategies, emphasizing quality of life.

AREAS COVERED

Patient-focused Comprehensive Angina Relief (CARE) clinics can enhance care and outcomes by providing individualized management for complex RA. This review summarizes peer-reviewed articles from PubMed and trial data from ClinicalTrials.gov. We discuss the epidemiology and pathophysiology of RA, introduce standardized tools for evaluating angina and psychosocial factors, and address symptom management. We also review treatment options such as risk factor modification, medication, and complex revascularization. Additionally, we explore emerging therapies, including coronary sinus occlusion, regenerative therapy, and neuromodulation for 'no-option' RA.

EXPERT OPINION

In the next five years, patients with refractory chest pain with or without coronary artery disease will increasingly be referred to specialty clinics for follow-up. Conducting more randomized control clinical trials with larger population subsets will bring novel therapies to the forefront.

Preventive effects of nitric oxide donors in contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing coronary artery angiography: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is associated with increased mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to assess the latest evidence on the preventive effects of nitric oxide (NO) donors in CIN patients undergoing CAG/PCI.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane searches until May 5th, 2024. Dichotomous data were pooled using risk ratio (RR), and continuous data were pooled using mean difference (MD), both with a 95% confidence interval (CI), using (R version 4.3).

RESULTS

Our analysis included 13 RCTs encompassing 3,550 patients. NO donors were significantly associated with a decreased incidence of CIN compared to placebo either as an oral administration (RR: 0.33 with 95% CI [0.26, 0.42], P < 0.01) or IV infusions (RR: 0.56 with 95% CI [0.40, 0.78], P < 0.01). Moreover, NO donors were significantly associated with decreased serum creatinine levels compared to placebo either as an oral administration (MD: - 0.07 with 95% CI [- 0.10, - 0.04], P < 0.01) or IV infusions (MD: - 0.07 with 95% CI [- 0.09, - 0.04], P < 0.01). In terms of safety, NO donors were significantly associated with a decreased incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) compared to placebo as an oral administration (RR: 0.64 with 95% CI [0.45, 0.89], P < 0.01). However, there was no significant difference between NO donors as IV infusions and placebo in MACE (RR: 0.68 with 95% CI [0.38, 1.21], P = 0.18). Finally, NO donors were significantly associated with a decreased incidence of all-cause mortality compared to placebo as an oral administration (RR: 0.58 with 95% CI [0.36, 0.94], P = 0.03). Nevertheless, there was no statistically significant difference in all-cause mortality between IV infusions of NO donors and placebo (RR: 1.84 with 95% CI [0.40, 8.52], P = 0.44).

CONCLUSION

NO donors as adjunct therapy are associated with reduced incidence of CIN and decreased serum creatinine levels, either as an oral or IV administration. They were also associated with reduced incidence of MACE, all-cause mortality, and recurrent myocardial infarction as an oral administration, which makes this simple, low-cost intervention an important therapeutic option in patients undergoing CAG/PCI.

Efficacy of Nicorandil in Preventing Myocardial Injury and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a common procedure for treating coronary artery disease, but it carries a risk of periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI). This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of nicorandil, a hybrid compound with nitrate-like and potassium channel-opening properties, in preventing PMI during PCI. A comprehensive literature search identified 14 studies involving 1,762 patients, with 882 receiving nicorandil and 880 in the control group. The analysis revealed that nicorandil significantly reduced the incidence of PMI (RR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.61-0.86) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.58-0.99) compared to the control group. Nicorandil's cardioprotective effects are attributed to its ability to improve coronary blood flow, precondition the myocardium, and reduce oxidative stress and inflammation. These findings suggest that nicorandil could be a valuable adjunctive therapy during PCI, potentially improving patient outcomes. However, the study had limitations, including variations in drug administration methods and a lack of individual-level data for subgroup analysis. Future research should focus on optimizing dosing regimens and administration timing and comparing nicorandil's effectiveness with other cardioprotective agents.

Effect of Perioperative Nicorandil on Myocardial Protection in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery with Cardiopulmonary Bypass, a Retrospective Study

Background

The potential myocardial protective effect of nicorandil (NICD) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention has been established. However, its efficacy in the context of cardiac surgery remains controversial. The present study aimed to evaluate the myocardial protective effect of perioperative NICD use in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).

Methods

We retrospectively gathered data from patients undergoing cardiac bypass surgery between 12/2018 and 04/2021 in Fuwai Hospital. Subsequently, the patients were divided into two groups, NICD group and non-nicorandil (non-NICD) group. A 1, 3 propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted. The primary outcome was the incidence of myocardial injury. The secondary outcomes included the mechanical ventilation (MV) duration, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, duration of chest drainage, the drainage volume, the total cost, the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), and the incidence of acute liver injury (ALI). Subsequently, we divided the entire population into two distinct subgroups based on their administration of NICD, and performed a comprehensive subgroup analysis.

Results

A total of 2406 patients were ultimately included in the study. After PSM, 250 patients in NICD group and 750 patients in non-NICD group were included in the analysis. Perioperative NICD reduced the incidence of myocardial injury (47.2% versus 38.8%, P=0.025). Our subgroup analysis revealed that preoperative NICD administration not only provided myocardial protection benefits (45.7% vs 35.8%, OR 0.66, 95% CI [0.45-0.97], P=0.041), but also demonstrated statistically significant reduction in ALI, the ICU and hospital LOS, and the duration of chest drainage (all P<0.05).

Conclusion

The perioperative NICD administration may confer myocardial protection in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with CPB. Furthermore, the preoperative utilization of NICD has the potential to mitigate the incidence of postoperative ALI, a reduction in the ICU and hospital LOS, and the duration of chest drainage.

Cardioprotective and Antianginal Efficacy of Nicorandil: A Comprehensive Review

ABSTRACT

Angina pectoris remains a significant burden despite advances in medical therapy and coronary revascularization. Many patients (up to 30%) with angina have normal coronary arteries, with coronary microvascular disease and/or coronary artery vasospasm being major drivers of the myocardial demand-supply mismatch. Even among patients revascularized for symptomatic epicardial coronary stenosis, recurrent angina remains highly prevalent. Medical therapy for angina currently centers around 2 disparate goals, viz secondary prevention of hard clinical outcomes and symptom control. Vasodilators, such as nitrates, have been first-line antianginal agents for decades, along with beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers. However, efficacy in symptoms control is heterogenous, depending on underlying mechanism(s) of angina in an individual patient, often necessitating multiple agents. Nicorandil (NCO) is an antianginal agent first discovered in the late 1970s with a uniquely dual mechanism of action. Like a typical nitrate, it mediates medium-large vessel vasodilation through nitric oxide. In addition, NCO has adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-dependent potassium channel agonist activity (K ATP ), mediating microvascular dilatation. Hence, it has proven effective in both coronary artery vasospasm and coronary microvascular disease, typically challenging patient populations. Moreover, emerging evidence suggests that cardiomyocyte protection against ischemia through ischemic preconditioning may be mediated through K ATP agonism. Finally, there is now fairly firm evidence in favor of NCO in terms of hard event reduction among patients with stable coronary artery disease, following myocardial infarction, and perhaps even among patients with congestive heart failure. This review aims to summarize the mechanism of action of NCO, its efficacy as an antianginal, and current evidence behind its impact on hard outcomes. Finally, we review other cardiac and emerging noncardiac indications for NCO use.

Effectiveness of intraoperative nicorandil in patients with a history of ischemic heart disease undergoing high-risk noncardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

Nicorandil is occasionally administered to prevent myocardial ischemia during the perioperative period in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD); however, its effectiveness has not been clarified. In this study, we examined the effectiveness of intraoperative nicorandil administration in noncardiac surgery.

METHODS

We identified patients with a history of IHD who had undergone high-risk noncardiac surgery between April 2015 and March 2020 from a nationwide in-patient database in Japan. The patients were divided into those who received nicorandil (nicorandil group) and those who did not (control group). The primary outcome was the 30-day in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as the composite outcome of the 30-day in-hospital mortality, acute myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention, and coronary artery bypass grafting. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed. The outcomes were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Of 8037 patients, 2886 received nicorandil during surgery. After propensity score matching, 2554 pairs were analyzed. There was no significant difference in the 30-day in-hospital mortality (26 [1.02%] vs. 36 [1.41%]; hazard ratio [HR] 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82-2.26; P = 0.229) or incidence of MACE (42 [1.64%] vs. 55 [2.15%]; HR 1.24; 95% CI 0.86-1.93; P = 0.216) between the control and nicorandil groups.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study suggest that intraoperative nicorandil administration is not associated with the 30-day in-hospital mortality in high-risk noncardiac surgery.

Incidence and Severity of Acute Myocardial Injury after Thoracic Surgery: Effects of Nicorandil

Aim. To study the perioperative dynamics of myocardial injury biomarkers high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI), ischemia-modified albumin (IMA) and soluble ST2 (sST2) when taking nicorandil in lung cancer patients with concomitant coronary heart disease (CHD) undergoing surgical lung resection.

Material and methods. The study included 54 patients (11 women and 43 men) with non-small cell lung cancer and concomitant stable CHD who underwent lung resection in the volume of lobectomy or pneumonectomy. Patients were randomly assigned to the nicorandil group (oral administration 10 mg BID for 7 days before and 3 days after surgery; n=27) and the control group (n=27). In the study groups, the perioperative dynamics of hscTnI, IMA and sST2, determined in the blood before and 24 and 48h after surgery, were compared. We calculated the incidence of acute myocardial injury in the groups, which was diagnosed in cases of postoperative hs-cTnI increase of more than one 99th percentile of the upper reference limit. The associations of nicorandil intake and acute myocardial injury were evaluated.

Results. The groups were comparable in gender, age, basic clinical characteristics, as well as baseline levels of myocardial injury biomarkers. After the intervention, both samples showed an increase in the hs-cTnI and sST2 levels and a decrease in IMA concentration (all p<0.02 for related group differences). In the nicorandil group, in comparison with the control one, 48h after surgery, we found lower mean levels of hs-cTnI [16.7 (11.9;39.7) vs 44.3 (15.0;130.7) ng/l; p<0.05) and sST2 [62.8 (43.6;70.1) vs 76.5 (50.2;87.1) ng/ml; p<0.05), concentration increase rates of hs-cTnI [14.8 (0.7;42.2) vs 32.5 (14.0;125.0) ng/l; p<0.01) and sST2 [24.4 (10.3;42.4) vs 47.4 (17.5;65.3) ng/ml; p<0.05), as well as highest concentrations for the entire postoperative period of hs-cTnI [30.7 (12.0;53.7) vs 79.0 (20.3;203.3) ng/L, p<0.01] and sST2 [99.8 (73.6;162.5) vs 147.8 (87.8;207.7) ng/mL; p<0.05]. The serum IMA decreased when taking nicorandil to a greater extent [-8.0 (-12.6; -2.0) vs -2.7 (-6.0; +5.5) ng/ ml; p<0.01] 24h after surgery. Acute myocardial injury was diagnosed in 7 people in the nicorandil group (25.9%) and in 15 in the control one (55.6%; pχ2=0.027). The adjusted odds ratio of acute myocardial injury when taking nicorandil was 0.35 (95% confidence interval 0.15-0.83, p=0.017).

Conclusion. Taking  nicorandil  in patients with lung cancer and concomitant CHD  who underwent  surgical  lung resection is associated  with a lower postoperative  increase in hs-cTnI  and sST2  and a reduced risk of acute myocardial  injury, which may indicate the cardioprotective effect of nicorandil under acute surgical stress conditions.

Combination of Nicorandil and Beta-Adrenergic Receptor Blockers in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: A Real-World Observational Study

BACKGROUND

The effect of combined nicorandil and beta-adrenergic receptor blockers (BBs) compared with that of BBs alone on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) remains undetermined.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective cohort study was performed. Adult patients who had been hospitalized for CAD and treated for angina with a combination of nicorandil and BBs or BBs alone were included. The effect of different treatments on the cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) and their components within a follow-up duration of 2.5 years were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method was used to adjust for the possible effect of confounding factors.

RESULTS

A total of 137,714 patients were screened, of whom 16,912 individuals (mean age: 61.5 years, men: 67.1%) were successfully enrolled. Among the enrolled participants, 4669 received the combined treatment of nicorandil and BBs, while 12,243 received BBs alone. After IPTW, the results demonstrated that the combined treatment was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of MACE (hazard ratio [HR] 0.79, 95% conidence interval [CI] 0.72-0.87) and stroke (HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.42-0.54) but not of MI (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.92-1.15) or all-cause mortality (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.64-1.37). Sensitivity analyses revealed similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

A combined antiangina treatment of nicorandil and BBs may be more effective than treatment of BBs alone in reducing the long-term incidence of MACE in patients with CAD.

Angina in 2022: Current Perspectives

Angina is the main symptom of ischemic heart disease; mirroring a mismatch between oxygen supply and demand. Epicardial coronary stenoses are only responsible for nearly half of the patients presenting with angina; whereas in several cases; symptoms may underlie coronary vasomotor disorders; such as microvascular dysfunction or epicardial spasm. Various medications have been proven to improve the prognosis and quality of life; representing the treatment of choice in stable angina and leaving revascularization only in particular coronary anatomies or poorly controlled symptoms despite optimal medical therapy. Antianginal medications aim to reduce the oxygen supply-demand mismatch and are generally effective in improving symptoms; quality of life; effort tolerance and time to ischemia onset and may improve prognosis in selected populations. Since antianginal medications have different mechanisms of action and side effects; their use should be tailored according to patient history and potential drug-drug interactions. Angina with non-obstructed coronary arteries patients should be phenotyped with invasive assessment and treated accordingly. Patients with refractory angina represent a higher-risk population in which some therapeutic options are available to reduce symptoms and improve quality of life; but robust data from large randomized controlled trials are still lacking.

The Safety of Nicorandil Therapy and the Relationship with Treatment Adherence in Patients with Stable Angina Pectoris (According to the NIKEA Observational Study)

The working group of the NIKEA study: Reznik I.I. (Ekaterinburg), Akulina E.N. (Ekaterinburg), Ezhov A.V. (Izhevsk), Shinkareva S.I. (Izhevsk), Grebnev S.A. (Izhevsk), Skibitsky V.V. (Krasnodar), Kudryashov E.A. (Krasnodar), Fendrikova A.V. (Krasnodar), Skibitsky A.V. (Krasnodar), Matyushin G.V. (Krasnoyarsk), Nemik D.B. (Krasnoyarsk), Pitaev R.R. (Krasnoyarsk), Altaev V.D. (Krasnoyarsk), Samokhvalov E.V. (Krasnoyarsk), Stolbikov Y.Y.. (Krasnoyarsk), Voronina V.P. (Moscow), Lerman O.V. (Moscow), Gaisenok O.V. (Moscow), Dmitrieva N.A. (Moscow), Zagrebelny A.V. (Moscow), Zakharova A.V. (Moscow), Balashov I.S. (Moscow), Leonov A.S. (Moscow), Sladkova T.A. (Moscow), Zelenova T.I. (Moscow), Shestakova G.N. (Moscow), Kolganova E.V. (Moscow), Maksimova M.A. (Moscow), Kuimov A.D. (Novosibirsk), Moskalenko I.V. (Novosibirsk), Shurkevich A.A. (Novosibirsk), Nechaeva G.I. (Omsk), Loginova E.N. (Omsk), Gudilin V.A. (Omsk), Mitroshina T.N. (Orel), Zhuravleva L.L. (Orel), Lobanova G.N. (Orel), Luneva M.M. (Orel), Libis R.A. (Orenburg), Kondratenko V.Yu. (Orenburg), Chesnikova A.I. (Rostov-on-Don), Kalacheva N.M. (Rostov-on-Don), Kolomatskaya O.O. (Rostov-on-Don), Dubishcheva N.F. (Rostov-on-Don), Romadina G.V. (Rostov-on-Don), Chugunova I.B. (Rostov-on-Don), Skarzhinskaya N.S. (Rostov-on-Don), Dobrynina N.V. (Ryazan), Yakushin S.S. (Ryazan), Bulanov A.V. (Ryazan), Trofimova Ya.M. (Ryazan), Nikolaeva A.S. (Ryazan), Sokolova L.A. (St. Petersburg), Savinova E.B. (St. Petersburg), Ievskaya E.V. (St. Petersburg), Vasilyeva L.B. (St. Petersburg), Gomova T.A. (Tula), Zubareva L.A. (Tula), Berberfish L.D. (Tula), Gorina G.I. (Tula), Nadezhkina K.N. (Tula), Yunusova K.N. (Tula), Nikitina V.F. (Tula), Dabizha V.G. (Tula), Renko I.E. (Tula), Soin I.A. (Tula)

Aim. To analyze the adverse events (AEs) of nicorandil therapy based on the results of an observational study of NIKEA, to assess the relationship between the occurrence of AEs treatment and adherence to it in patients with stable angina pectoris.

Material and methods. The study included 590 people who had nicorandil added to the basic therapy of coronary artery disease (CAD). The followup period averaged 21 months. There were two visits of 1 and 3 months of follow-up (V1 and V3), and after 21 months, by telephone contact (PhC21), it was possible to obtain information about 524 patients (89% response), 509 of whom were alive. Information about the treatment adherence and AEs of nicorandil was collected during V1, V3 and at PhC21.

Results. Out of 590 people, 402 (68.1%) patients started treatment with nicorandil. During 21 months of follow-up, 35 AEs were registered in 34 patients. There were no serious AEs associated with taking medications in the study. The most frequent AEs of treatment with nicorandil were hypotension and headache, which led to non-adherence to therapy in 94% and 42% of cases, respectively. The majority of AEs (24 out of 35) occurred during the first three months of nicorandil treatment. Both any AEs of drug therapy and AEs of nicorandil therapy, on average, increase the chance of non-adherence to the recommended treatment by 3 times (p=0.004).

Conclusion. The results of the NIKEA study confirmed the good safety of nicorandil in patients with stable angina pectoris, the absence of serious adverse events associated with taking this antianginal drug. The most frequent nicorandil AEs were hypotension and headache. Any AEs of therapy increase the chance of patients' non-adherence by 3 times.

Effects of Nicorandil Administration on Infarct Size in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The CHANGE Trial

Background Nicorandil was reported to improve microvascular dysfunction and reduce reperfusion injury when administered before primary percutaneous coronary intervention. In this multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial (CHANGE [Effects of Nicorandil Administration on Infarct Size in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention]), we investigated the effects of nicorandil administration on infarct size in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Methods and Results A total of 238 patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction were randomized to receive intravenous nicorandil (n=120) or placebo (n=118) before reperfusion. Patients in the nicorandil group received a 6-mg intravenous bolus of nicorandil followed by continuous infusion at a rate of 6 mg/h. Patients in the placebo group received the same dose of placebo. The predefined primary end point was infarct size on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging performed at 5 to 7 days and 6 months after reperfusion. CMR imaging was performed in 201 patients (84%). Infarct size on CMR imaging at 5 to 7 days after reperfusion was significantly smaller in the nicorandil group compared with the placebo (control) group (26.5±17.1 g versus 32.4±19.3 g; P=0.022), and the effect remained significant on long-term CMR imaging at 6 months after reperfusion (19.5±14.4 g versus 25.7±15.4 g; P=0.008). The incidence of no-reflow/slow-flow phenomenon during primary percutaneous coronary intervention was much lower in the nicorandil group (9.2% [11/120] versus 26.3% [31/118]; P=0.001), and thus, complete ST-segment resolution was more frequently observed in the nicorandil group (90.8% [109/120] versus 78.0% [92/118]; P=0.006). Left ventricular ejection fraction on CMR imaging was significantly higher in the nicorandil group than in the placebo group at both 5 to 7 days (47.0±10.2% versus 43.3±10.0%; P=0.011) and 6 months (50.1±9.7% versus 46.4±8.5%; P=0.009) after reperfusion. Conclusions In the present trial, administration of nicorandil before primary percutaneous coronary intervention led to improved myocardial perfusion grade, increased left ventricular ejection fraction, and reduced myocardial infarct size in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03445728.

Nicorandil Improves Left Ventricular Myocardial Strain in Patients With Coronary Chronic Total Occlusion

Background

Nicorandil is recommended as a second-line treatment for stable angina; however, randomized-controlled trials to evaluate the benefit of nicorandil for patients with chronic total occlusion (CTO) are lacking.

Objective

To determine whether nicorandil can improve left ventricular (LV) myocardial strain in patients with CTO.

Methods

Patients with CTO were included and randomized to the nicorandil group (n = 31) and the control group (n = 30). Nicorandil was given orally at 15 mg/day for 3 months in the nicorandil group. Three-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography and the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) survey were performed at baseline and at 3 months. The primary study endpoint was the LV global area strain (GAS) at 3 months.

Results

The nicorandil and the control groups were well-matched at baseline, including the mean GAS and SAQ scores. At 3 months, GAS in the nicorandil group was significantly higher than that in the control group (−23.7 ± 6.3% vs. −20.3 ± 5.6%, respectively; p = 0.033). There were no significant differences in LV global longitudinal strain, global circumferential strain, global radial strain, LV ejection fraction, LV end-diastolic volume, and LV end-systolic volume at 3 months between the two groups. At 3 months, the SAQ scores for angina stability, angina frequency, and treatment satisfaction in the nicorandil group were significantly higher than those in the control group.

Conclusion

Nicorandil treatment can improve GAS and angina symptoms in patients with CTO.

Clinical Trial Registration

www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT05087797.

2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: Developed by the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). With the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC

Document Reviewers: Rudolf A. de Boer (CPG Review Coordinator) (Netherlands), P. Christian Schulze (CPG Review Coordinator) (Germany), Magdy Abdelhamid (Egypt), Victor Aboyans (France), Stamatis Adamopoulos (Greece), Stefan D. Anker (Germany), Elena Arbelo (Spain), Riccardo Asteggiano (Italy), Johann Bauersachs (Germany), Antoni Bayes-Genis (Spain), Michael A. Borger (Germany), Werner Budts (Belgium), Maja Cikes (Croatia), Kevin Damman (Netherlands), Victoria Delgado (Netherlands), Paul Dendale (Belgium), Polychronis Dilaveris (Greece), Heinz Drexel (Austria), Justin Ezekowitz (Canada), Volkmar Falk (Germany), Laurent Fauchier (France), Gerasimos Filippatos (Greece), Alan Fraser (United Kingdom), Norbert Frey (Germany), Chris P. Gale (United Kingdom), Finn Gustafsson (Denmark), Julie Harris (United Kingdom), Bernard Iung (France), Stefan Janssens (Belgium), Mariell Jessup (United States of America), Aleksandra Konradi (Russia), Dipak Kotecha (United Kingdom), Ekaterini Lambrinou (Cyprus), Patrizio Lancellotti (Belgium), Ulf Landmesser (Germany), Christophe Leclercq (France), Basil S. Lewis (Israel), Francisco Leyva (United Kingdom), AleVs Linhart (Czech Republic), Maja-Lisa Løchen (Norway), Lars H. Lund (Sweden), Donna Mancini (United States of America), Josep Masip (Spain), Davor Milicic (Croatia), Christian Mueller (Switzerland), Holger Nef (Germany), Jens-Cosedis Nielsen (Denmark), Lis Neubeck (United Kingdom), Michel Noutsias (Germany), Steffen E. Petersen (United Kingdom), Anna Sonia Petronio (Italy), Piotr Ponikowski (Poland), Eva Prescott (Denmark), Amina Rakisheva (Kazakhstan), Dimitrios J. Richter (Greece), Evgeny Schlyakhto (Russia), Petar Seferovic (Serbia), Michele Senni (Italy), Marta Sitges (Spain), Miguel Sousa-Uva (Portugal), Carlo G. Tocchetti (Italy), Rhian M. Touyz (United Kingdom), Carsten Tschoepe (Germany), Johannes Waltenberger (Germany/Switzerland) All experts involved in the development of these guidelines have submitted declarations of interest. These have been compiled in a report and published in a supplementary document simultaneously to the guidelines. The report is also available on the ESC website www.escardio.org/guidelines For the Supplementary Data which include background information and detailed discussion of the data that have provided the basis for the guidelines see European Heart Journal online.

Kir6.2-deficient mice develop somatosensory dysfunction and axonal loss in the peripheral nerves

Glucose-responsive ATP-sensitive potassium channels (K_ATP) are expressed in a variety of tissues including nervous systems. The depolarization of the membrane potential induced by glucose may lead to hyperexcitability of neurons and induce excitotoxicity. However, the roles of K_ATP in the peripheral nervous system (PNS) are poorly understood. Here, we determine the roles of K_ATP in the PNS using K_ATP-deficient (Kir6.2-deficient) mice. We demonstrate that neurite outgrowth of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons was reduced by channel closers sulfonylureas. However, a channel opener diazoxide elongated the neurite. K_ATP subunits were expressed in mouse DRG, and expression of certain subunits including Kir6.2 was increased in diabetic mice. In Kir6.2-deficient mice, the current perception threshold, thermal perception threshold, and sensory nerve conduction velocity were impaired. Electron microscopy revealed a reduction of unmyelinated and small myelinated fibers in the sural nerves. In conclusion, K_ATP may contribute to the development of peripheral neuropathy.

Functional Angioplasty: Definitions, Historical Overview, and Future Perspectives

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is used to treat obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). The role of PCI is well defined in acute coronary syndrome, but that for stable CAD remains debatable. Although PCI generally relieves angina in patients with stable CAD, it may not change its prognosis. The extent and severity of CAD are major determinants of prognosis, and complete revascularization (CR) of all ischemia-causing lesions might improve outcomes. Several studies have shown better outcomes with CR than with incomplete revascularization, emphasizing the importance of functional angioplasty. However, different definitions of inducible myocardial ischemia have been used across studies, making their comparison difficult. Various diagnostic tools have been used to estimate the presence, extent, and severity of inducible myocardial ischemia. However, to date, there are no agreed reference standards of inducible myocardial ischemia. The hallmarks of inducible myocardial ischemia such as electrocardiographic changes and regional wall motion abnormalities may be more clinically relevant as the reference standard to define ischemia-causing lesions. In this review, we summarize studies regarding myocardial ischemia, PCI guidance, and possible explanations for similar findings across studies. Also, we provide some insights into the ideal definition of inducible myocardial ischemia and highlight the appropriate PCI strategy.

Clinical Implications of Nicorandil Combined with Trimetazidine in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: A Real-World Observational Study

INTRODUCTION

Coronary heart disease (CHD) remains the leading cause of mortality in China. The treatment strategies, especially for patients with ischemic angina pectoris, are still far from satisfactory. Hence, this study was carried out to evaluate the long-term potential of nicorandil in Chinese patients with CHD.

METHODS

Adult patients with CHD were reviewed retrospectively from three hospitals in Central China to obtain relevant data. The primary outcome was the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) which is the composite outcome of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and mortality at 3 years while the secondary outcomes included rates of MACE, stroke, MI, and mortality at 1 and 2 years. The rates of MACE were estimated using Kaplan-Meir survival curves and compared by log-rank test. The association between various treatment regimens and hazards of MACE was estimated using Cox proportional hazards model. All analyses were carried out using SAS 9.4.

RESULTS

A total of 5504, 1674, and 3923 patients treated with the nicorandil-trimetazidine combination, nicorandil, and trimetazidine were included in the study, respectively. At 3-year follow-up, the rate of MACE [hazard ratio (HR) 0.85; 95% CI 0.74-0.97; P = 0.017] and stroke (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.48-0.71; P < 0.0001) was lower in the combination group compared to trimetazidine group. Similarly, the rate of stroke was significantly lower (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.52-0.93; P = 0.0146) at 3 years in the nicorandil group compared to the trimetazidine group. The rate of stroke (HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.52-0.83; P = 0.0004) was significantly lower among the combination group compared with the trimetazidine group at 1-year follow-up. Similarly, the rate of stroke was significantly lower at 1 year (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.50-0.97; P = 0.03) but not at 2 years (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.52-0.94; P = 0.0177), while the rate of other outcomes, though lower in the nicorandil group than the trimetazidine group, was not statistically significant at 1 and 2 years respectively.

CONCLUSION

Nicorandil in combination with trimetazidine can be considered as an effective and potential treatment strategy in reducing the rate of MACE in patients with CHD in the Chinese population.

A pathophysiological compass to personalize antianginal drug treatment

Myocardial ischaemia results from coronary macrovascular or microvascular dysfunction compromising the supply of oxygen and nutrients to the myocardium. The underlying pathophysiological processes are manifold and encompass atherosclerosis of epicardial coronary arteries, vasospasm of large or small vessels and microvascular dysfunction - the clinical relevance of which is increasingly being appreciated. Myocardial ischaemia can have a broad spectrum of clinical manifestations, together denoted as chronic coronary syndromes. The most common antianginal medications relieve symptoms by eliciting coronary vasodilatation and modulating the determinants of myocardial oxygen consumption, that is, heart rate, myocardial wall stress and ventricular contractility. In addition, cardiac substrate metabolism can be altered to alleviate ischaemia by modulating the efficiency of myocardial oxygen use. Although a universal agreement exists on the prognostic importance of lifestyle interventions and event prevention with aspirin and statin therapy, the optimal antianginal treatment for patients with chronic coronary syndromes is less well defined. The 2019 guidelines of the ESC recommend a personalized approach, in which antianginal medications are tailored towards an individual patient's comorbidities and haemodynamic profile. Although no antianginal medication improves survival, their efficacy for reducing symptoms profoundly depends on the underlying mechanism of the angina. In this Review, we provide clinicians with a rationale for when to use which compound or combination of drugs on the basis of the pathophysiology of the angina and the mode of action of antianginal medications.

Ranolazine: a better understanding of pathophysiology and patient profile to guide treatment of chronic stable angina

Chronic stable angina pectoris, the most prevalent symptomatic manifestation of coronary artery disease, greatly impairs quality of life and is associated with an increased risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes. Better understanding of the pathophysiologic mechanisms of myocardial ischemia permitted new therapeutic strategies to optimize the management of angina patients. Ideally, antianginal drug treatment should be tailored to individual patient's profile and chosen according to the pathophysiology, hemodynamic profile, adverse effects, potential drug interactions and comorbidities. In this respect, and because of its peculiar mechanism of action, ranolazine represents an alternative therapeutic approach in patients with chronic stable angina and may be considered the first choice in presence of comorbidities that difficult the use of traditional therapies.

State of the art approach to managing angina and ischemia: tailoring treatment to the evidence

Stable angina represents a chronic and often debilitating condition that affects daily activities and quality of life in patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS). Current European Society of Cardiology guidelines recommend a four-step approach for the medical treatment of patients taking into consideration hemodynamic variables (heart rate and blood pressure) and the presence or absence of left ventricular dysfunction. However, CCS patients often have several comorbidities and risk factors. Thus, a tailored approach that takes into consideration patient risk factors and comorbidities may have additional benefits beyond angina relief. This is a state of the art review of stable angina treatment based on the currently available evidence.

Nicorandil inhibits TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB/NLRP3 signaling pathway to reduce pyroptosis in rats with myocardial infarction

Pyroptosis is an inflammatory cell death that regulates cardiomyocyte loss after myocardial infarction. Reports indicate that nicorandil has a strong anti-inflammatory effect and protects the myocardium from myocardial infarction. However, its relationship with pyroptosis is largely unreported. Here, we investigated to influence and mechanism of action of nicorandil on cardiomyocyte pyroptosis. Forty Sprague Dawley rats were randomly assigned to sham, MI, MI + nicorandil, and MI + nicorandil + TAK242 groups (10 per group). Myocardial infarction modeling was performed through ligation of the anterior descending branch of the left coronary artery. The function of cardiac was evaluated through echocardiography, detection of myocardial adenine nucleotides, cTnI, LDH, TTC, and HE staining. Moreover, we used qRT-PCR, immunohistochemistry, and Western blotting to examine the expression of pyroptosis-related molecules and the inflammasome pathway of TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB/NLRP3. Myocardial infarction caused the activation of GSDMD, aggravated myocardial injury, and triggered cardiac dysfunction. Myocardial infarction induced pyroptotic cell death, manifested as upregulation in mRNA and protein levels associated with pyroptosis, including caspase-1 cleavage and increased expression of IL-1β and IL-18. These changes were mitigated by nicorandil. The achieved data implicate that myocardial infarction induces pyroptosis via the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB/NLRP3 pathway, which can be inhibited by nicorandil pretreatment. Therefore, nicorandil exerts cardioprotective effects by activating K_ATP channels, and at least in part through inhibition of the TLR4/MyD88/NF-κB/NLRP3 pathway to reduce myocardial infarction-induced pyroptosis. As such, it is a potential therapy for ischemic heart disease.

Myocardial protective effect of intracoronary administration of nicorandil and alprostadil via targeted perfusion microcatheter in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of nicorandil and alprostadil on myocardial protection in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

In this prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled study, 90 consecutive patients scheduled for elective PCI for de novo coronary lesions were assigned to the nicorandil, alprostadil, and nitroglycerin groups in a 1:1:1 ratio. Drugs were administered intracoronary via a targeted perfusion microcatheter. The primary endpoint was the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) myocardial perfusion frame count (TMPFC). Additionally, the corrected TIMI frame count (cTFC), TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG), and incidence of periprocedural myocardial injury (PMI) were assessed.

RESULTS

Both nicorandil and alprostadil were significantly effective in reducing TMPFC (114.6 ± 33.7 vs 93.4 ± 30.9, P = .016; 114.3 ± 34.3 vs 94.7 ± 33.3, P = .029, respectively). Similar findings were observed in the improvement of cTFC (20.3 ± 10.5 vs 13.5 ± 5.0, P = .003; 20.2 ± 7.4 vs 15.2 ± 5.2, P = .003, respectively) and percentage of TMPG 3 (100% vs 82.8%, P = .052; 83.3% vs 96.7%, P = .196, respectively); whereas, nitroglycerin produced a limited effect on TMPFC (114.4 ± 30.9 vs 112.1 ± 31.9, P = .739), cTFC (19.4 ± 7.2 vs 19.3 ± 7.2, P = .936), and percentage of TMPG 3 (86.7% vs 86.7%, P = 1.000). No significant difference was found in the incidence of PMI (16.7% vs 16.0% vs 27.6%, P = .537), though it was comparatively lower in the nicorandil and alprostadil groups. Furthermore, the intracoronary administration of nicorandil and alprostadil had a mild effect on blood pressure and heart rate.

CONCLUSIONS

The intracoronary administration of nicorandil and alprostadil via a targeted perfusion microcatheter was more effective in improving myocardial perfusion in patients undergoing elective PCI than nitroglycerin.

Observational studies and registers. Their quality and role in modern evidence-based medicine

The article describes the basic rules for conducting observational studies, in particular, registers. The principles of the assessment of its quality and impact on the results are discussed. The potential for evaluating therapeutic effect and side effects in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies is compared. Effects of one drug identified in RCTs and observational studies are compared.

Comparison of the outcomes of the prolonged antianginal therapy use in stable coronary artery disease patients according to the data of randomized and observational studies

Objective

To compare the results of treatment with antianginal drug nicorandil in patients with stable coronary artery disease according to the results of the observational study (OS) «NIKEA» and randomized controlled trial (RCT) «IONA».

Methods

«NIKEA » observational program included 590 patients with stable angina pectoris. Subgroups in the OS were formed based on the adherence to nicorandil use. Adherence was assessed during follow-up direct questioning. «IONA » RCT included 5126 patients with stable angina pectoris.

Results

Follow-up period and mean age of patients were equal in OS and RCT. In OS the group of adherent to nicorandil use patients had fewer males, life-saving drugs were administered significantly more often than in RCT, comorbidities (arterial hypertension, peripheral atherosclerosis and diabetes mellitus) were more pronounced. Angina pectoris class III was diagnosed in 32% of the OS patients vs 11% of the RCT patients, and class I – in 4.4% and 26%, respectively (р<0.001). Both in RCT and OS, there were significantly fewer cases of all cardiovascular events in the groups of nicorandil and adherent to nicorandil use patients in comparison with the groups of placebo and nonadherent patients. Both in RCT and OS the use of nicorandil led to significant decrease in the risk of all cardiovascular events.

Conclusion

Results of the efficacy and effectiveness studies complement each other and give the opportunity to assess the realisation of the RCT results in real clinical practice.

Nicorandil-induced colovesical fistula in a patient with diverticular disease

Nicorandil's adverse effects can cause severe patient morbidity and can present to any specialty. Those with underlying diverticular disease are most susceptible. Medication reviews are vital for patients presenting with ulcer or fistula symptoms.

Comparison of antiangina therapies in patients with coronary heart disease in China: study protocol for a multicentre, retrospective, hospital system-based study

INTRODUCTION

China has the largest number of patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) in the world. Numerous pharmacological strategies are available for CHD in routine clinical practice. CHD-induced angina pectoris affects patients' quality of life and is a key predictor of prognosis. This study will compare the effectiveness of different antiangina treatments, particularly ATP-sensitive potassium channel (KATP) activators, in the Central China District. This proposal underpins the first comparison of antiangina therapies in patients with CHD in China using a multicentre, retrospective, hospital system-based assessment.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This retrospective real-world study will assess the largest hospital databases in Wuhan City in Central China to evaluate outcomes including mortality, revascularisation, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and other cardio-cerebrovascular events in patients with CHD. Data will be consecutively collected between 1 April 2009 and 31 August 2019 through the hospital information system, laboratory information system and hospital imaging system. All data will be standardised by at least three independent technicians and statisticians using International Classification of Diseases Tenth Version, ISO15189 and Specification for Drafting of Basic Dataset of Electronic Medical Record (WS445). The data will include patient demographics, physical and laboratory examinations, imaging examinations, medical history, diagnosis, treatment options and payment information. We will compare KATP activators with other antiangina drugs using propensity score matching. The primary outcome will be major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as a composite of death, MI, stroke and rehospitalisation due to angina.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The current study is designed to translate research into improved care for patients. The institutional review board of Wuhan Tongji Hospital (Liao Jiazhi, Du Aiye, Chen Zhishui, Fang Feng, Yu Shiying, Liu Dong and Li Yaping) approved the study protocol (version 1.0, July 2019, approval number TJ-IRB201909112). Here we reported a protocol related to a pre-results. Data will be presented in peer-reviewed journals, social media and relevant conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR1900027812; Pre-results.

The Role of Nicorandil in the Management of Chronic Coronary Syndromes in the Gulf Region

Chronic coronary syndromes (CCS) and stable angina are a growing clinical burden worldwide. This is of particular concern in the Gulf region given its high prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, especially diabetes mellitus and smoking. Despite recommendations on the use of first- and second-line anti-anginal medication, management challenges remain. Current guidelines for pharmacologic treatment are not determined by the range of pathophysiological mechanisms of ischaemia and consequent angina, which may occur either in isolation or co-exist. In this article, we highlight the need to improve knowledge of the epidemiology of chronic coronary syndromes in the Middle East and Gulf region, and the need for studies of stratified pharmacologic approaches to improve symptomatic angina and quality of life in the large and growing number of patients with coronary artery disease from this region. We discuss the role of nicorandil, currently recommended as a second-line anti-anginal drug in CCS patients, and suggest that this may be a particularly useful add-on therapy for patients in the Gulf region.

Effects of Nicorandil on Inflammation, Apoptosis and Atherosclerotic Plaque Progression

Nicorandil, a balanced vasodilator, is used in the second-line therapy of angina pectoris. In this study, we aimed to illuminate the effects of nicorandil on inflammation, apoptosis, and atherosclerotic plaque progression. Twenty-five LDL-R -/- mice were fed a high-fat diet for 14 weeks. After 6 weeks mice were randomly allocated to treatment with nicorandil (10 mg/kg/day) or tap water. Nicorandil treatment led to a more stable plaque phenotype, displaying an increased thickness of the fibrous cap (p = 0.014), a significant reduction in cholesterol clefts (p = 0.045), and enhanced smooth muscle cell content (p = 0.009). In endothelial cells nicorandil did not reduce the induction of adhesion molecules or proinflammatory cytokines. In H₂O₂ challenged endothelial cells, pretreatment with nicorandil significantly reduced the percentage of late apoptotic/necrotic cells (p = 0.016) and the ratio of apoptotic to living cells (p = 0.036). Atherosclerotic lesions of animals treated with nicorandil exhibited a significantly decreased content of cleaved caspase-3 (p = 0.034), lower numbers of apoptotic nuclei (p = 0.040), and reduced 8-oxogunanine staining (p = 0.039), demonstrating a stabilizing effect of nicorandil in established atherosclerotic lesions. We suggest that nicorandil has a positive effect on atherosclerotic plaque stabilization by reducing apoptosis.

Untapped Possibilities of Antiischemic Therapy after Acute Myocardial Infarction: Data from the PROFILE-IM Register

Aim. To evaluate the practice of prescribing antianginal/antiischemic therapy in patients who, after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), retained typical clinical manifestations of stable angina.

Material and methods. The registry includes 160 patients who applied to the polyclinic from March 01, 2014 to June 30, 2015 after suffering an AMI. Anti-ischemic therapy was evaluated in patients with typical angina pectoris.

Results. Based on the survey, typical angina attacks were detected in almost a quarter of patients (38 patients – 23.8%). According to the main indicators, patients with typical angina pectoris practically did not differ from the rest of the group of patients, with the exception of a significantly larger proportion of patients with diagnosed ischemic heart disease before AMI and patients under dispensary supervision. Almost all patients received beta-blockers (97.4%), about a third of patients received calcium antagonists (28.9%) or long-acting nitrates (34,2%). During the first year after AMI, second-line drugs were practically not prescribed to enhance antianginal therapy. According to international non-proprietary names, the choice of doctors tended to prescribe bisoprolol, amlodipine, and isosorbide dinitrate. Exacerbation of the disease course with hospitalization for unstable angina pectoris was recorded in 9 (23.7%) patients from the group with typical angina pectoris and in 5 (4.1%) patients in the rest of the group (p<0.001).

Conclusion. In real clinical practice, only a small part of patients with typical angina pectoris receive drug therapy that corresponds to evidence-based medicine; therefore, the unique possibilities of antianginal (anti-ischemic) therapy often remain unrealized.

Refractory Angina-Unsolved Problem

The article discusses pharmacologic and interventional therapeutic options for patients with refractory angina. Refractory angina refers to long-lasting symptoms (≥3 months) due to established reversible ischemia in the presence of obstructive coronary artery disease, which cannot be controlled by escalating medical therapy with second-line and third-line pharmacologic agents, bypass grafting, or stenting. Due to an aging population, increased number of comorbidities, and advances in coronary artery disease treatment, incidence of refractory angina is growing. Although the number of therapeutic options is increasing, there is a lack of randomized clinical trials that could help create recommendations for this group of patients.

Effects of nicorandil infusion on ECG parameters in patients with unstable angina pectoris and percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is effective in treating patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) but is associated with some serious complications. Nicorandil is an anti-anginal agent acting to improve microvascular circulation and to increase coronary blood flow. The objective of this article is to evaluate the effects of intracoronary injection followed with continuous intravenous injection of nicorandil on ECG parameters in patients with unstable angina pectoris (UA) undergoing PCI.

METHODS

A single-center, self-controlled clinical trial was conducted at the Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University between January 2019 and April 2019. Sixty-three consecutive patients with UA who received coronary angiography and selective PCI were enrolled. ECG was recorded and analyzed before and 24 hr after nicorandil infusion.

RESULTS

Patients were divided into three groups: control group (n = 23, aged 63.43 ± 12.55 years), short-term, and prolonged use with nicorandil group (n = 20 and 20, aged 66.45 ± 8.06 years and 65.80 ± 9.49 years, respectively). Clinical characteristics and ECG parameters were similar before PCI among three groups (p > .05). In nicorandil treatment groups, intervals of QTd and Tp-e in patients post-PCI were significantly shorter than that in control and pre-PCI (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Nicorandil infusion reduces QTd and Tp-e interval in patients with UA. Further studies will be needed to determine whether these electrophysiological changes are associated with a reduction of ventricular arrhythmias and improved outcomes.

ATP-sensitive potassium channels gene polymorphism rs1799858 affects the risk of macro-/micro-vascular arteriosclerotic event in patients with increased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels

Background

Plasma concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is causally related to the risk of arteriosclerotic events. Whether ATP-sensitive potassium channels (KATP) genetic variants predict increased LDL-C concentration (≥1.8 mmol/L) and risk of macro-/micro-vascular arteriosclerotic event remain elusive.

Methods

A total of 320 subjects with increased LDL-C concentration (≥1.8 mmol/L) and 320 counterpart subjects (< 1.8 mmol/L) from the South China were enrolled in this study. Three KATP polymorphisms (rs1799858, rs4148671 and rs78148713) were genotyped by the Sequenom MassARRAY system. Binary logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the association of the 3 KATP variants with increased LDL-C concentration and carotid artery stenosis (CAS) ≥50%. Two-way ANOVA was used to analyze the association of the 3 KATP variants with microalbumin in urine (MAU) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (HsCRP) levels. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was used to retrospectively analyse the association of the optimal variant with the risk of new onset/recurrent acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Results

Among the 3 studied KATP gene single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), only rs1799858 (TT + CT genotype) was associated with elevated risk of LDL-C ≥ 1.8 mmol/L (adjusted OR = 2.25, 95% CI: 1.31–3.85, P = 0.003) and CAS ≥50% (adjusted OR = 2.80, 95% CI: 1.12–6.98, P = 0.028). KATP SNP rs1799858 was also associated with increased MAU (P = 0.013) and HsCRP (P = 0.027) levels. The follow-up for an average of 51.1-months revealed that participants carrying the T-allele (TT + CT) of rs1799858 was associated with high risk of new onset/recurrent AMI (adjusted HR = 2.90, 95% CI: 1.06–7.94, P = 0.038).

Conclusion

The KATP SNP rs1799858 may be an optimal genetic predisposition marker for increased LDL-C concentration (≥1.8 mmol/L) and its related macro-/micro-vascular arteriosclerotic event risk. The KATP variant rs1799858 was associated with higher risk of macro-/micro-vascular arteriosclerotic events in patients with elevated serum LDL-C levels.

Effect of nicorandil administration on cardiac burden and cardio-ankle vascular index after coronary intervention

Myocardial injury is a problem associated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study aimed to clarify the role of nicorandil administration in preventing myocardial injury. This study included patients with stable angina who underwent PCI from November 2013 to June 2016. Of 58 consecutive patients, the first 20 patients received only saline infusion after PCI (control group); the other 38 patients received a continuous intravenous infusion of nicorandil and saline after PCI (nicorandil group). Troponin I and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels were measured. Vascular parameters, such as blood pressure (BP), cardiac output, cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI), and estimated systemic vascular resistance (eSVR), were measured. Troponin I of both groups increased 12 h after PCI. Changes in BNP levels between immediately after PCI and 12 h after PCI were significantly higher in the control than in the nicorandil group (10.8 ± 44.2 vs. − 2.6 ± 14.6 pg/ml, p = 0.04). In the nicorandil group, BP, eSVR, and CAVI decreased significantly at 12 h after PCI compared with those immediately after PCI (p < 0.0001), whereas no change was observed in the control group. In a single linear analysis, the change in BP (r = 0.36, p < 0.01) and nicorandil administration (r = − 0.47, p < 0.001) was significantly correlated with the change in CAVI, multiple regression analysis revealed that the changes in CO and eSVR were significant contributing factors for the changes in CAVI. PCI could result in myocardial injury and/or cardiac burden in patients with stable angina. Nicorandil administration after PCI may be effective in relieving the burden by decreasing arterial stiffness (CAVI).

The Effect of Pharmacological Preconditioning with Nicorandil before Elective Coronary Stenting on the Long-Term Prognosis of Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease

Aim. To study nicorandil prescription effects before elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to prevent myocardial injury and 4a type acute myocardial infarction (MI, primary endpoint) and cardiovascular events (CVE) in the first year after PCI (secondary endpoint) in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

Material and methods. 182 patients with stable coronary artery disease were included into the study and were randomized into two groups: nicorandil treatment group (n=90) and a control group with a standard medical treatment (n=92). Nicorandil was prescribed orally: 2 days before PCI – 30 mg/day; on the day of PCI – 20 mg 2 hours before intervention and 10 mg 6-12 hours after PCI; over the next 30 days – 30 mg/day. High sensitivity troponin I (hs-Tr) and creatine kinase-MB tests were carried out before PCI, 24 and 72 hours after the intervention; the 4a type MI was diagnosed according to the 4th Universal Definition. Non-fatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, death from cardiovascular diseases, repeat revascularization (PCI, coronary artery bypass surgery due to aggravation), hospital admissions for angina pectoris recurrence (without interventions) and death from any causes were considered as cardiovascular events. Data on adverse outcomes were collected over the hospital stay, and then 30, 180 and 365 days after the hospital discharge.

Results. 4a type MI was diagnosed in 14 patients (8%), in women – 12% and in men – 6%. There was a significant decrease in the incidence of type 4a MI in the nicorandil group (n=3; 3%) compared with the control group (n=11; 12%; p=0.05). Secondary endpoint was recorded in 21% of patients. The relationship was found between 4a type MI and the incidence of CVE the next year after the PCI (p=0.01). In patients with type 4a MI CVE odd ratio increases 5.8 times with confidence interval from 1.5426 to 21.6024. According to the logistic regression analysis the significant relationship between hs-Tr growth 24 hours after the PCI and CVE incidence next year after the PCI was found with cutting value 389.8 pg/ml, AUC=0.641 (p=0.04).

Сonclusion. Peroral nicorandil 30 mg/day 2 days before PCI, 20 mg 2 hours before surgery and 10 mg 6-12 hours after PCI, and 30 mg/day next 30 days after PCI decreases the risk of intraoperative myocardial injury and CVE in the next year after PCI.

Exogenous NO Therapy for the Treatment and Prevention of Atherosclerosis

Amyl nitrite was introduced in 1867 as the first molecule of a new class of agents for the treatment of angina pectoris. In the following 150 years, the nitric oxide pathway has been the subject of a number of pharmacological approaches, particularly since when this elusive mediator was identified as one of the most important modulators of vascular homeostasis beyond vasomotion, including platelet function, inflammation, and atherogenesis. While having potent antianginal and antiischemic properties, however, nitric oxide donors are also not devoid of side effects, including the induction of tolerance, and, as shown in the last decade, of oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction. In turn, endothelial dysfunction is itself felt to be involved in all stages of atherogenesis, from the development of fatty streaks to plaque rupture and thrombosis. In the present review, we summarize the agents that act on the nitric oxide pathway, with a particular focus on their potentially beneficial antiatherosclerotic and unwanted pro-atherosclerotic effects.

Effects of Intracoronary Nicorandil on Myocardial Microcirculation and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND

The amelioration of myocardial reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) remains a significant issue.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to better assess the effects of intracoronary nicorandil administration on myocardial microcirculation and clinical outcomes in these patients.

METHODS

The meta-analysis was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement. A literature search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases up to April 2019, with no time or language limitations. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) were calculated to evaluate the treatment effects.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs involving a total of 562 patients were included. Compared with control, intracoronary nicorandil significantly reduced the incidence of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) grade ≤ 2 (RR 0.349; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.199-0.611; P < 0.001) and TIMI myocardial perfusion grade ≤ 2 (RR 0.611; 95% CI 0.438-0.852; P = 0.004) and was associated with higher complete ST-segment resolution rates (RR 1.326; 95% CI 1.090-1.614; P = 0.005). However, no significant benefits were observed on clinical outcomes, including death (RR 0.370; 95% CI 0.085-1.618; P = 0.187), recurrent myocardial infarction (RR 0.507; 95% CI 0.156-1.655; P = 0.261), heart failure (RR 0.528; 95% CI 0.224-1.247; P = 0.145), and target lesion/vessel revascularization (RR 1.109; 95% CI 0.553-2.224; P = 0.770).

CONCLUSIONS

Intracoronary nicorandil can significantly improve myocardial microcirculation in patients with AMI undergoing PPCI, but it failed to offer clinically significant benefits.

Nicorandil, a KATP Channel Opener, Attenuates Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Isolated Rat Lungs

PURPOSE

Nicorandil is a hybrid between nitrates and K_ATP channel opener activators. The aim of this study was to evaluate the nicorandil's effects on ischemia-reperfusion (IR) lung injury and examine the mechanism of its effects.

METHODS

Isolated rat lungs were divided into 6 groups. In the sham group, the lungs were perfused and ventilated for 150 min. In the IR group, after perfusion and ventilation for 30 min, they were interrupted (ischemia) for 60 min, and then resumed for 60 min. In the nicorandil (N) + IR group, nicorandil 6 mg was added before ischemia (nicorandil concentration was 75 µg ml^-1). In the glibenclamide + N + IR group, the L-NAME (N_ω-Nitro-L-arginine methyl ester) + N + IR group and ODQ (1H-[1,2,4]oxadiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one) + N + IR group, glibenclamide 3 µM, L-NAME 100 µM, and ODQ 30 µM were added 5 min before nicorandil administration, respectively. We measured the coefficient of filtration (Kfc) of the lungs, total pulmonary vascular resistance, and the wet-to-dry lung weight ratio (WW/DW ratio).

RESULTS

Kfc was significantly increased after 60 min reperfusion compared with baseline in the IR group, but no change in the sham group. An increase in Kfc was inhibited in the N + IR group compared with the IR group (0.92 ± 0.28 vs. 2.82 ± 0.68 ml min^-1 mmHg^-1 100 g^-1; P < 0.01). Also, nicorandil attenuated WW/DW ratio was compared with IR group (8.3 ± 0.41 vs. 10.9 ± 2.5; P < 0.05). Nicorandil's inhibitory effect was blocked by glibenclamide and ODQ (P < 0.01), but not by L-NAME.

CONCLUSIONS

Nicorandil attenuated IR injury in isolated rat lungs. This protective effect appears to involve its activation as K_ATP channel opener as well as that of the sGC-cGMP pathway.