Ototoxicity induced by once-daily gentamicin

Gentamicin sulphate permeation through porcine intestinal epithelial cell monolayer

Gentamicin is an aminoglycoside antibiotic widely used in combination with dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) in topical drug formulations. It is not known, however, whether DMSO can enhance the permeation of gentamicin through biological membranes, leading to oto- and nephrotoxic side effects. A simple and reliable high-performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method was applied for the quantitative determination of gentamicin collected from the apical and basolateral compartments of the porcine intestinal epithelial cell line IPEC-J2 cell monolayer using fluorometric derivatisation of the analyte with fluorenylmethyloxycarbonyl chloride (FMOC) prior to chromatographic run in the presence and absence of 1% DMSO. The lack of change in transepithelial electrical resistance (TER) demonstrated that gentamicin and 1% DMSO did not affect IPEC-J2 cell monolayer integrity via the disruption of cell membranes. Chromatographic data also ascertained that gentamicin penetration across the cell monolayer even in the presence of 1% DMSO was negligible at 6 h after the beginning of apical gentamicin administration. This study further indicates that the addition of this organic solvent does not increase the incidence of toxic effects related to gentamicin permeation.

Antimicrobial treatment of febrile neutropenia: pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic considerations

Patients with cancer or hematologic diseases are particularly at risk of infection leading to high morbidity, mortality and costs. Extensive data show that optimization of the administration of antimicrobials according to their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters improves clinical outcome. Evidence is growing that when pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters are used to target not only clinical cure but also eradication, the selection resistance is also contained. This is of particular importance in patients with neutropenia in whom increasing rates of drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria have been reported, particularly Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Based on experimental and clinical studies, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters are discussed in this review for each antibiotic used in febrile neutropenia in order to help physicians improve dosing and optimization of antimicrobial agents.

Hearing loss and vestibular dysfunction among children with cancer after receiving aminoglycosides

BACKGROUND

Children undergoing cancer therapy often receive aminoglycosides to treat febrile neutropenia or gram-negative infections. The magnitude of the risk of developing aminoglycoside-induced ototoxicity and the dose threshold at which that risk significantly increases are unknown.

PROCEDURE

Eligible cancer patients received the aminoglycoside amikacin at Children's Medical Center between 2004 and 2007. They were aged 3-8 years; were without prior hearing loss; had no platinum-based chemotherapy, cranial radiation, nor bone marrow transplant; and received no loop diuretics within 6 weeks of testing. Consenting patients underwent complete hearing and vestibular testing.

RESULTS

We tested 23 patients who had significant amikacin exposure. Three (13%) had abnormal hearing tests, and four (17%) had subclinical vestibular dysfunction; none had both. Of those with hearing loss, two were known to have developed hearing loss after aminoglycoside exposure, but the third had moderate to severe high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss bilaterally that had been undiagnosed. We observed clear dose-dependent ototoxicity; of the eight patients who received amikacin for a cumulative total of more than 50 days, five (68%) developed toxicity. Similarly, of the seven who received a cumulative total of more than 1,200 mg/kg, five developed toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

These data highlight the risks of prolonged aminoglycoside administration and warrant further validation in a larger group of patients. Patients to be treated with prolonged aminoglycoside therapy may benefit from prospective hearing screening.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of antimicrobials

Optimizing the prescription of antimicrobials is required to improve clinical outcome from infections and to reduce the development of antimicrobial resistance. One such method to improve antimicrobial dosing in individual patients is through application of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). The aim of this manuscript is to review the place of TDM in the dosing of antimicrobial agents, specifically the importance of pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) to define the antimicrobial exposures necessary for maximizing killing or inhibition of bacterial growth. In this context, there are robust data for some antimicrobials, including the ratio of a PK parameter (e.g. peak concentration) to the minimal inhibitory concentration of the bacteria associated with maximal antimicrobial effect. Blood sampling of an individual patient can then further define the relevant PK parameter value in that patient and, if necessary, antimicrobial dosing can be adjusted to enable achievement of the target PK/PD ratio. To date, the clinical outcome benefits of a systematic TDM programme for antimicrobials have only been demonstrated for aminoglycosides, although the decreasing susceptibility of bacteria to available antimicrobials and the increasing costs of pharmaceuticals, as well as emerging data on pharmacokinetic variability, suggest that benefits are likely.

Once-daily gentamicin in infants and children: a prospective cohort study evaluating safety and the role of therapeutic drug monitoring in minimizing toxicity

BACKGROUND

The clinical evidence base for ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity outcomes with once-daily dosing (ODD) of gentamicin in children is suboptimal. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in once-daily gentamicin regimens is variable and its role in predicting or preventing clinical toxicity is unclear. We aimed to assess the safety of ODD of gentamicin and the usefulness of TDM in a pediatric cohort.

METHODS

Children with suspected sepsis were prospectively enrolled to receive ODD of gentamicin at 7 mg/kg/day. Hearing and renal function were objectively assessed at baseline, during therapy, and after therapy. TDM was performed using an interval-adjusted graphical method (Hartford nomogram).

RESULTS

A total of 79 children (median age: 5.6 years; range: 1 month-16 years) received 106 episodes of therapy. In all, 61% of these episodes were for febrile neutropenia. Evaluation was complete in 88% for ototoxicity and 92% for nephrotoxicity. Two patients (1.88%, 95% confidence interval: 0.10%-7.13%) experienced permanent hearing loss. One patient (0.94%, 95% confidence interval: <0.10%-5.73%) experienced transient nephrotoxicity. No abnormal serum gentamicin values were detected, even in those experiencing toxicity. Children experiencing toxicity were undergoing treatment for malignancies and had received nephrotoxic or ototoxic medicines before gentamicin.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pediatric cohort receiving ODD of gentamicin, nephrotoxicity was uncommon and reversible, but irreversible ototoxicity occurred more frequently. TDM using a nomogram neither predicted nor prevented toxicity, which was only observed in those with risk factors.

Classification of childhood hearing impairment: implications for rehabilitation in developing countries

AIM

To ascertain the rehabilitation needs of hearing impaired school entrants in developing countries based on current criteria for evaluating classification of childhood hearing impairment.

METHODS

The profile of hearing impairment was examined in 50 children from eight randomly selected mainstream schools, based on findings from medical history, physical examination, otoscopy, pure-tone audiometry and tympanometry. The hearing thresholds across frequencies 0.25 - 8.0 kHz were analysed. The results were compared with conventional pure-tone averages (0.5 - 4.0 kHz) and WHO's criteria/threshold for disabling hearing impairment.

RESULTS

Seventeen (94.4%) of the 18 children with conductive hearing loss based on conventional audiometry had high-frequency hearing loss. Similarly, 10 children (83.3%) of the 12 children with sensorineural hearing loss and 19 children (95%) of the 20 children with mixed hearing loss had high-frequency hearing loss. Forty-six hearing impaired children (92%): comprising those with permanent unilateral hearing loss > 30 dBHL, permanent hearing loss would have been missed by WHO criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional school audiometry and WHO criteria for disabling hearing impairment are unlikely to detect the full spectrum of hearing disability in relation to activity limitation and participation restriction. The rehabilitation needs of the affected children cannot therefore be appropriately addressed by these approaches.

A survey of the antibiotic treatment of febrile neutropenia in haematology units in the United Kingdom

We performed a nationwide survey to define the different practices in managing febrile neutropenia in haematology units. A questionnaire was sent out to a named haematologist in each of 220 haematology units in the UK. Questions were asked regarding antibiotics of choice in managing febrile neutropenia and the use of antibiotic prophylaxis. Responses were received from 167 (76%) haematology units. Combination therapy with piperacillin-tazobactam and gentamicin is used first-line in febrile neutropenia by 72% of units. Piperacillin-tazobactam monotherapy is used first-line by 5% of units. When response to initial empirical therapy does not occur after 24-48 h, 32% of haematology units add a glycopeptide (vancomycin or teicoplanin) and 31% change to a carbapenem and a glycopeptide. Seventy-one percent of units use oral fluoroquinolone prophylaxis for all neutropenic patients. The antibiotic treatment of febrile neutropenia in haematology patients, and the use of antibiotic prophylaxis, vary significantly across the UK. This survey is the first to examine the prescribing of UK haematology units in this area, and could help in the formulation of practice guidelines.

Gentamicin induced ototoxicity during treatment of enterococcal endocarditis: resolution with substitution by netilmicin

Enterococcal endocarditis can be very difficult to eradicate, requiring prolonged treatment with a combination of a penicillin and an aminoglycoside. In this patient with a pacemaker associated enterococcal endocarditis, ototoxicity occurred due to total gentamicin dose despite plasma concentrations consistently within the treatment range. Substitution with netilmicin, without a break in aminoglycoside treatment, resulted in a rapid improvement in hearing and allowed the required course of aminoglycoside to be completed. The risk factors for ototoxicity with gentamicin are reviewed, in particular the dangers of increasing age and of multiple and prolonged courses. Close treatment monitoring does not totally avoid this risk, especially when prolonged aminoglycoside treatment is required. This case emphasises the need for prompt investigation and adequate, definitive treatment of enterococcal endocarditis to avoid the increased risk consequent on repeated courses of antibiotics. The resolution of the ototoxicity with netilmicin is consistent with other reports of lower cochleotoxicity than with other aminoglycosides.

Permanent Gentamicin Vestibulotoxicity

OBJECTIVE

To determine the natural history of permanent gentamicin vestibulotoxicity.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective; comparison of retrospective and prospective studies.

SETTING

Tertiary neurotology clinic. Clinical research and technology center.

SUBJECTS

Thirty-three subjects with permanent gentamicin-induced vestibulotoxicity.

INTERVENTIONS

Medical records review, neurotologic examination, and vestibular and auditory function tests.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Vestibular and auditory function test results at least 1 year after discontinuation of gentamicin, clinical examination results, serum gentamicin levels, and serum creatinine levels.

RESULTS

Thirty-three subjects had vestibular function test results consistent with permanent gentamicin ototoxicity. All complained of dysequilibrium, 32 described oscillopsia, and 23 had tinnitus. All 33 subjects had complained of symptoms consistent with ototoxicity within 1 to 3 weeks of initiation of gentamicin therapy; however, gentamicin vestibulotoxicity was not recognized before hospital discharge in 32 of 33 subjects. Serum peak and trough gentamicin levels did not correlate with the development of vestibulotoxicity, nor did observance of recommended "safe" dosage ranges. Of 17 subjects whose serum creatinine levels were recorded, 6 experienced abnormal elevations in serum creatinine in conjunction with gentamicin use.

CONCLUSION

Gentamicin can cause permanent vestibular and auditory ototoxicity. There is no safe dose of gentamicin. Serum gentamicin levels are of no value in predicting the onset, occurrence, or severity of vestibulotoxicity or cochleotoxicity. Termination of gentamicin on appearance of signs or symptoms of ototoxicity may reduce the incidence of permanent vestibular ototoxicity. When possible, other antibiotics should be administered.

New Developments in Antibacterial Choice for Lower Respiratory Tract Infections in Elderly Patients

Elderly patients are at increased risk of developing lower respiratory tract infections compared with younger patients. In this population, pneumonia is a serious illness with high rates of hospitalisation and mortality, especially in patients requiring admission to intensive care units (ICUs). A wide range of pathogens may be involved depending on different settings of acquisition and patient's health status. Streptococcus pneumoniae is the most common bacterial isolate in community-acquired pneumonia, followed by Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis and atypical pathogens such as Chlamydia pneumoniae, Legionella pneumophila and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. However, elderly patients with comorbid illness, who have been recently hospitalised or are residing in a nursing home, may develop severe pneumonia caused by multidrug resistant staphylococci or pneumococci, and enteric Gram-negative bacilli, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Moreover, anaerobes may be involved in aspiration pneumonia. Timely and appropriate empiric treatment is required in order to enhance the likelihood of a good clinical outcome, prevent the spread of antibacterial resistance and reduce the economic impact of pneumonia. International guidelines recommend that elderly outpatients and inpatients (not in ICU) should be treated for the most common bacterial pathogens and the possibility of atypical pathogens. The algorithm for therapy is to use either a selected beta-lactam combined with a macrolide (azithromycin or clarithromycin), or to use monotherapy with a new anti-pneumococcal quinolone, such as levofloxacin, gatifloxacin or moxifloxacin. Oral (amoxicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefuroxime axetil) and intravenous (sulbactam/ampicillin, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime) beta-lactams are agents of choice in outpatients and inpatients, respectively. For patients with severe pneumonia or aspiration pneumonia, the specific algorithm is to use either a macrolide or a quinolone in combination with other agents; the nature and the number of which depends on the presence of risk factors for specific pathogens. Despite these recommendations, clinical resolution of pneumonia in the elderly is often delayed with respect to younger patients, suggesting that optimisation of antibacterial therapy is needed. Recently, some new classes of antibacterials, such as ketolides, oxazolidinones and streptogramins, have been developed for the treatment of multidrug resistant Gram-positive infections. However, the efficacy and safety of these agents in the elderly is yet to be clarified. Treatment guidelines should be modified on the basis of local bacteriology and resistance patterns, while dosage and/or administration route of each antibacterial should be optimised on the basis of new insights on pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters and drug interactions. These strategies should be able to reduce the occurrence of risk factors for a poor clinical outcome, hospitalisation and death.

Individualising aminoglycoside dosage regimens after therapeutic drug monitoring: simple or complex pharmacokinetic methods?

Measurements of aminoglycoside concentration in serum are used to individualise dosage regimens (dose per administration and/or administration interval) with the goal of attaining the desired therapeutic range as quickly as possible. Therapeutic range is defined in terms of peak concentration (to monitor effectiveness) and trough concentration (to avoid toxicity). This article focuses on methods to individualise aminoglycoside dosage regimens in the context of extended dosage intervals. Simple pharmacokinetic methods involve linear dosage adjustment based on peak or trough concentrations or area under the concentration-time curve, or nomograms. The once daily aminoglycoside nomogram determines the dosage interval for aminoglycosides given as a fixed dose per administration, based on a single concentration measurement drawn 6 to 14 hours after the start of the first infusion. This is a preferred method because of its simplicity, strong pharmacodynamic rationale and prospective validation in a large population. However, it does not work when the fixed dose assumed is not relevant, for example for patients with burns, cystic fibrosis, ascites or pregnancy. Furthermore, it has not been validated in children. In these cases, a more sophisticated method is required. Complex pharmacokinetic methods require dedicated software. Non-Bayesian least-squares methods allow the optimisation of both the dose and the dosage interval, but require aminoglycoside concentrations from two or more samples taken in the post-distributive phase during a single dosage interval. With Bayesian least-squares methods, only one concentration measurement is required, although any number of samples can be taken into account. In the Bayesian maximum a posteriori (MAP) method, the parameter estimates are taken as the values corresponding to the maximum of the posterior density. In 'full' Bayesian approaches (also called stochastic control), all the information about the parameters revealed by the posterior distribution is taken into account, and the optimal regimen is found by minimising the expected value of the weighted sum of squared deviations between predicted and target concentrations. If the population model is reasonably well known, Bayesian methods (MAP or stochastic control) should be used because of their good predictive performance. Although only one concentration measurement is required, better precision is afforded by a two-sample strategy, preferably drawn 1 and 6 hours after the start of the first infusion. If the population model is not known, then the non-Bayesian least-squares method is the method of choice, because of its robustness and lack of requirement for prior information about the distribution of parameters in the population.

Ototoxicity induced by gentamicin and furosemide

OBJECTIVE

To present a case of ototoxicity induced by furosemide and once-daily gentamicin therapy.

CASE SUMMARY

A 60-year-old white woman presented to the hospital with community-acquired pneumonia and urinary tract infection. The antibiotic regimen included gentamicin and, after 5 doses, the patient reported profound bilateral hearing loss. A Pure Tone Audiogram suggested moderate to moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss bilaterally. The only risk factors present included her age, elevated temperature, and the use of furosemide.

DISCUSSION

Several risk factors may predispose a patient to developing aminoglycoside ototoxicity: the 1555 chromosomal mutation, preexisting disorders of hearing and balance, hypovolemia, bacteremia, liver and renal dysfunction, and the simultaneous administration of other ototoxic medications. The cumulative dose and duration of aminoglycoside therapy are more important than serum concentrations. Administration of an aminoglycoside followed by furosemide may increase the risk of ototoxicity. The aminoglycoside interacts with the cell membranes in the inner ear, increasing their permeability. This theoretically allows the loop diuretic to penetrate into the cells in higher concentrations, causing more severe damage.

CONCLUSIONS

Auditory toxicity occurred after only 5 days of gentamicin therapy and 1 dose of furosemide. An aminoglycoside followed by furosemide may increase the risk for ototoxicity. Clinicians need to be aware of the synergistic potential of ototoxic medications.

Once-daily versus multiple-daily gentamicin in empirical antibiotic therapy of febrile neutropenia following intensive chemotherapy

The clinical efficacy and toxicity of once-daily compared with multiple-daily gentamicin dosing, in combination with azlocillin, were studied retrospectively in febrile neutropenic episodes following intensive chemotherapy. Fifty-two episodes were studied in 28 patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. Reasons for initiation of antibiotic therapy, dose, duration of treatment, organism isolation rates, response, cost comparison and toxicity were studied in the two treatment groups. The main indication for initiation of antibiotic therapy was neutropenic fever without a documented infection (80.8% of episodes). The response rate to once-daily gentamicin dosing and azlocillin was three times higher than to multiple-daily gentamicin dosing and azlocillin (P = 0.0112). The incidence of toxicity was low overall and was slightly but not significantly higher in the once-daily group. In this clinical context once-daily gentamicin at a dose of 7 mg/kg/day is more effective than a multiple-daily dosing regimen but may be more toxic.

The therapeutic monitoring of antimicrobial agents

AIMS

To review the basis and optimal use of therapeutic drug monitoring of antimicrobial agents.

METHODS

Antimicrobial agents for which a reasonable case exists for therapeutic drug monitoring were reviewed under the following headings: pharmacokinetics, why monitor, therapeutic range, individualisation of therapy, sampling times, methods of analysis, interpretative problems and cost-effectiveness of monitoring.

RESULTS

There is a strong historical case for monitoring aminoglycosides. The recent move to once-daily dosing means that criteria for therapeutic drug monitoring need to be redefined. Vancomycin has been monitored routinely but many questions remain about the most appropriate approach to this. A case can be made for monitoring teicoplanin, flucytosine and itraconazole in certain circumstances.

CONCLUSIONS

The approach to monitoring aminoglycosides needs to be redefined in the light of once-daily dosing. It is premature to suggest that less stringent monitoring is necessary as toxicity remains a problem with these drugs. The ideal method of monitoring vancomycin remains to be defined although a reasonable case exists for measuring trough concentrations, mainly to ensure efficacy. Teicoplanin is monitored occasionally to ensure efficacy while flucytosine is monitored occasionally to avoid high concentrations associated with toxicity. Itraconazole has various pharmacokinetic problems and monitoring has been suggested to ensure that adequate concentrations are achieved.