Oral ixazomib maintenance following autologous stem cell transplantation (TOURMALINE-MM3): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial

Efficacy of maintenance or consolidation therapy for multiple myeloma based on proteasome inhibitors: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study assessed the efficacy of proteasome inhibitors (PIs) in both maintenance and consolidation therapies for MM patients.

METHODS

A comprehensive search across multiple databases was conducted, including PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar, CNKI, EMBASE, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and others, to identify randomized controlled trials published in both Chinese and English languages that examined the use of PIs in either consolidation or maintenance therapy for multiple myeloma. The effectiveness outcomes assessed included complete response (CR), very good partial response or better (≥ VGPR), partial response (PR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Our analysis comprised four (4) randomized controlled trials investigating maintenance therapy and six (6) randomized controlled trials assessing consolidation therapy, including data from 4711 patients. PIS-based treatments significantly improved PFS and OS compared to the control group. PI-based consolidation therapy significantly prolonged PFS. In maintenance therapy, both PIs improved PFS and OS relative to the observation group. PIs significantly improved the achievements of CR in patients compared to the control group. CR attainment in maintenance therapy appeared slightly less effective than in consolidation therapy. PIs significantly improved ≥ VGPR in patients compared to the control group. Consolidation therapy demonstrated a greater improvement in ≥ VGPR compared to maintenance therapy.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with PI-based maintenance or consolidation therapy showed improvements in CR,  ≥ VGPR, PFS, and OS in patients with MM. However, it is noteworthy that PIs-based maintenance and consolidation therapy were associated with an increased risk of  ≥ grade 3 adverse events.

First Line Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Transplant Eligible Multiple Myeloma Recommendations From a Canadian Consensus Guideline Consortium

The availability of effective therapies for multiple myeloma (MM) has sparked debate on the role of first line autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), particularly in standard-risk patients. However, treatment for individuals with high-risk disease continues to display suboptimal outcomes. With novel therapies used earlier, practice is changing rapidly in the field of MM. Presently, quadruplet induction therapy incorporating an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody to a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory drug prior to ASCT followed by maintenance therapy stands as the foremost strategy for attaining deep and sustained responses in transplant eligible MM (TEMM). This Canadian Consensus Guideline Consortium (CGC) proposes consensus recommendations for the first line treatment of TEMM. To address the needs of physicians and people diagnosed with MM, this document focuses on ASCT eligibility, induction therapy, mobilization and collection, conditioning, consolidation, and maintenance therapy, as well as, high-risk populations, management of adverse events, assessment of treatment response, and monitoring for disease relapse. The CGC will periodically review the recommendations herein and update as necessary.

Real-world outcomes of maintenance therapy post-autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma

BACKGROUND

In the Republic of Korea, only lenalidomide, bortezomib, ixazomib, and thalidomide monotherapy are available as maintenance therapy post-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT).

METHODS

To determine whether maintenance therapy confers a survival benefit in the real world, we compared treatment outcomes according to the use and type of maintenance therapy in patients who underwent ASCT following frontline therapy with the triplet regimen of bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in 15 nationwide centers.

RESULTS

A total of 512 patients were analyzed (no-maintenance group, n = 359, and maintenance group, n = 153 patients). Among those receiving maintenance therapy, 104 (68%) received thalidomide, 33 (21%) lenalidomide, and 16 (10%) bortezomib or ixazomib. The median progression-free survival (PFS) from the time of ASCT was 26.4 and 44.1 months in the no-maintenance and maintenance groups, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, the use of maintenance therapy was significantly associated with better PFS. After adjustment for the type and duration of maintenance therapy, the use of bortezomib or ixazomib was associated with better PFS than other drugs. Longer duration of therapy was associated with improved PFS. No statistically significant difference was observed in overall survival and secondary malignancy rates by use or type of maintenance.

CONCLUSION

Despite practical limitations, maintenance therapy after ASCT demonstrated a gain in PFS in the real world, and there was no clear increase in the risk of secondary malignancy. Therefore, it may be prudent to consider implementing maintenance therapy in a feasible manner.

Autologous stem-cell transplantation and maintenance therapy for transplant-eligible multiple myeloma patients: cost-effectiveness analysis based on a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ASCT and maintenance therapy strategies for transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma from a Chinese healthcare perspective.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A short-run decision tree and a long-run Markov model were created to assess the mean costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of ASCT plus maintenance therapy over a lifetime horizon. Utility values were sourced from published literature, while healthcare costs were based on a single-center retrospective analysis and national drug bidding data.

RESULTS

The ASCT strategy with two-year daratumumab maintenance had the lowest discounted costs (1,394,183 CNY). Compared to no ASCT with continuous lenalidomide maintenance, ASCT had an ICER of 90,997 CNY/QALY. With one-year lenalidomide maintenance, ASCT provided more QALYs at lower costs. One-year lenalidomide maintenance after ASCT also resulted in higher QALYs and lower costs than no maintenance, while continuous lenalidomide had an ICER of 396,731 CNY/QALY.

CONCLUSIONS

Under the WTP threshold of CNY 268,074 per QALY, ASCT strategies were more cost-effective than non-ASCT approaches. One-year lenalidomide therapy after ASCT was more cost-effective than no maintenance or continuous therapy. Among all strategies, ASCT followed by two years of daratumumab maintenance was the most cost-effective option.

Evidence-based Korean guidelines for the clinical management of multiple myeloma: addressing 12 key clinical questions

Multiple myeloma (MM), a hematological malignancy, is characterized by malignant plasma cell proliferation in the bone marrow. Recent treatment advances have significantly improved patient outcomes associated with MM. In this study, we aimed to develop comprehensive, evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of MM. We identified 12 key clinical questions essential for MM management, guiding the extensive literature review and meta-analysis of the study. Our guidelines provide evidence-based recommendations by integrating patient preferences with survey data. These recommendations include current and emerging diagnostic tools, therapeutic agents, and treatment strategies. By prioritizing a patient-centered approach and rigorous data analysis, these guidelines were developed to enhance MM management, both in Korea and globally.

The Progress of Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma (Review)

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant hematological disease originating from plasma cells that remains incurable. Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is an important treatment method for MM. With the development of new drugs, the treatment of MM patients who meet the ASCT criteria has significantly improved, and the median survival time has increased by 8-10 years. The current treatment for MM patients who meet the ASCT criteria consists mainly of the following stages: induction therapy, stem cell collection, stem cell transplantation, and consolidation and maintenance therapy. Even today, long-term disease control remains the goal of MM treatment in clinical practice. In the era of new drugs, early ASCT still results in longer progression-free survival (PFS) and is currently the standard treatment method for young newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. Moreover, tandem transplantation can be considered for MM patients with high-risk cytogenetics. This review discusses mainly the role of ASCT in MM, the conditions for patient transplantation, the induction chemotherapy regimen before transplantation, the conditioning regimen, the timing of transplantation, and the effectiveness of tandem transplantation, including maintenance and salvage ASCT after transplantation.

Induction Chemotherapy-Related Covert Cardiac Remodeling in Pre-Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma: A Retrospective Observational Study

BACKGROUND

Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) has emerged as a cornerstone in multiple myeloma (MM) management, offering the prospect of prolonged disease control. However, the induction chemotherapy drugs required prior to ASCT carry cardiovascular toxicity (CVT), potentially leading to a range of cardiovascular complications.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This retrospective observational study, conducted at Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital from January 2020 to December 2023, analyzed 47 of the initial 173 patients who met the criteria. The cohort, comprising 22 males (46.81%) and 25 females (53.19%), had a mean age of 55.68 ± 11.38 years. They underwent various induction chemotherapy regimens, receiving a median of 5 (4-6) cycles of the course over an average duration of 7.10 ± 2.46 months. Before ASCT treatment following induction chemotherapy, echocardiographic findings indicated reductions in left ventricular end-systolic dimension, right atrial diameter, E-wave velocity, E/e' ratio, and the E/A ratio. The latter altered from a pretreatment value greater than 1 to posttreatment less than 1, marking diastolic dysfunction emergence or aggravation in 51.06% of patients. The electrocardiographic data indicate a reduced heart rate and prolonged P-wave duration and P-R duration, with an increase in arrhythmia incidence to 19.15% following induction chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Induction chemotherapy, administered prior to ASCT in patients with MM, can lead to the emergence or aggravation of cardiac diastolic dysfunction and increase the incidence of arrhythmic events. Therefore, it is crucial to emphasize the importance of balancing the benefits and risks of induction chemotherapy to maximize its efficacy while minimizing CVT.

Ixazomib as consolidation and maintenance versus observation in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma eligible for salvage autologous stem-cell transplantation (Myeloma XII [ACCoRD]): interim analysis of a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of consolidation and maintenance in the context of salvage autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) for relapsed multiple myeloma remains unclear. We aimed to assess whether consolidation after salvage autologous HSCT, using ixazomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone, followed by maintenance with single agent ixazomib is superior to observation.

METHODS

This is an interim analysis of Myeloma XII (ACCorD; referred to as ACCorD hereafter), an open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial done at 79 hospitals in the UK. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, had relapsed multiple myeloma with measurable disease, an ECOG performance status of 2 or less with adequate renal, hepatobiliary, pulmonary, and cardiac function, and required treatment for first progressive disease occurring at least 12 months after first autologous HSCT. In a first randomisation, patients were assigned (1:1) to receive either conventional autologous HSCT with melphalan or augmented autologous HSCT with melphalan and ixazomib. In the second randomisation, reported here, patients were assigned (1:1) to consolidation using ixazomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (oral ixazomib 4 mg per day on days 1, 8, and 15, oral thalidomide 100 mg per day on days 1-28, and oral dexamethasone 40 mg per day on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 of 28-day cycles), followed by maintenance with single agent ixazomib (oral ixazomib 4 mg per day on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles until disease progression or intolerance), or observation. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, analysed by intention-to-treat. Safety was analysed per-protocol. This study is registered with ISRCTN, ISRCTN10038996, and EudraCT, 2016-000905-35, and recruitment is complete.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 12, 2017, and April 21, 2023, 206 patients entered the second randomisation (103 in the consolidation and maintenance group and 103 in the observation group). This prespecified interim analysis (data cutoff April 21, 2023), was done at a median follow-up of 27 months (IQR 13-38). Median progression-free survival was 20 months (95% CI 15-29) in the consolidation and maintenance group and 13 months (11-18) in the observation group (hazard ratio 0·55 [95% CI 0·39-0·78]; p=0·0006). Serious adverse events were reported in 29 (32%) of 92 patients in the consolidation and maintenance group compared with seven (7%) of 103 patients in the observation group. The most common serious adverse events were infections and infestations in both the consolidation and maintenance group and the observation group. The most common grade 3, 4, or 5 adverse events for patients in the consolidation and maintenance group were upper respiratory infection (seven [8%] of 92 patients). No deaths in the consolidation and maintenance group were deemed treatment related.

INTERPRETATION

ACCorD provides evidence that an orally administered, deliverable, and tolerable post-salvage autologous HSCT treatment regimen can improve the durability of response for transplantation-eligible patients at first relapse. The findings are of relevance to patients who had durable disease control from autologous HSCT in the first line, representing a viable alternative to continuous parentally-administered relapse therapies.

FUNDING

Cancer Research UK, Takeda Oncology.

Alliance A061202: ixazomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone for patients with lenalidomide-refractory MM in first relapse

ABSTRACT

Optimal therapy for the growing number of patients with lenalidomide (LEN)-refractory multiple myeloma in their first relapse remains poorly defined. We therefore undertook a randomized phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib (IXA) with pomalidomide (POM) and dexamethasone (DEX) in this patient population. The overall response rate (ORR) for POM-DEX was 43.6%, and for IXA-POM-DEX, it was 63.2%. The depth of response, measured by the attainment of at least a very good partial response, favored triplet therapy over doublet therapy (28.9% vs 5.1%; P = .0063). A preplanned interim analysis after 75% of the progression events had occurred demonstrated an improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) that favored IXA-POM-DEX and that crossed the predefined boundary of superiority, leading to release of the study results. With additional follow-up, the median PFS for POM-DEX was 7.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8-13.6 months) vs 20.3 months for IXA-POM-DEX (95% CI, 7.7-26.0 months; hazard ratio, 0.437; upper 90% bound = 0.657). The ORR and median PFS for 26 of 30 eligible patients who crossed over from the doublet to the triplet therapy at disease progression was 23.1% and 5.6 months, respectively. Overall survival was similar between the 2 groups. More hematologic toxicities were seen with the triplet therapy, but nonhematologic adverse events were similar between the 2 arms. Our data support further testing of this all-oral triplet therapy in comparison with current standard triplet therapy in the context of phase 3 studies for patients with LEN-refractory disease at first relapse. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02004275.

Mitigating time toxicity in lymphoma and multiple myeloma

The concept of time toxicity in oncology refers to the presence of frequent healthcare-related interactions that can interfere with patient well-being. In this review, we examine several manifestations of time toxicity in non-Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma and discuss their impact on decision-making with patients. For example, time toxicity may influence the choice of chemoimmunotherapy versus lenalidomide-rituximab in follicular lymphoma. In myeloma, it may inform the optimal dosing schedule for proteasome inhibitors and bisphosphonates. In both malignancies, varying time toxicity profiles are a key distinction between chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies and bispecific antibodies. We outline the challenges with measuring time toxicity as a trial endpoint but discuss its importance as a consideration for patient care, both in standard-of-care settings and in clinical trials. Throughout the review, we highlight strategies to lower the time toxicity of therapies in lymphoma and myeloma without compromising their efficacy or patient safety.

Meta-analysis of effectiveness and safety of proteasome inhibitor-dependent maintenance treatment for multiple myeloma a systematic review

Background

Even with significant advancements, treating multiple myeloma (MM) remains difficult. At present, the main treatment methods include combined treatment of stem cell transplantation, drug treatment, etc. With the clarification of the molecular biological mechanism of MM, as well as the in-depth study of the internal signal of myeloma cells and the microenvironment of MM patients, more and more new drugs targeting myeloma and microenvironment are gradually used in clinical maintenance treatment, such as inhibit the proteosome: ixazomib, bortezomib and carfilzomib, immune - modulators: thalidomide and lenalidomide, monoclonal antibodies, etc. have made great progress in MM maintenance treatment. With the continuous development of proteasome inhibitor maintenance treatment in MM, the prognosis of the disease has been significantly improved. Our aim is to evaluate the effectiveness and adverse reactions of proteasome inhibitors in maintenance therapy for multiple myeloma, providing new ideas for clinical medication.

Methods

Four databases containing randomized controlled studies on the effectiveness and safety of proteasome inhibitors in the maintenance therapy of multiple myeloma are retrieved by the computer. Once the quality of the literature has been thoroughly evaluated, run the data via the RevMan 5.3 software.

Results

Eventually 8 studies were added in this systematic review. Compared with the placebo group, proteasome inhibitor in maintenance treatment of multiple myeloma patients with prolonged the survival without progression and overall existence. 5 studies reported the peripheral neuropathy of multiple myeloma in the treatment group compared to placebo group, which was remarkably greater (OR: 1.98; 95 % Cl: 1.35, 2.92; P < 0.001) compared to placebo group, Serious adverse events (OR: 1.60; 95 % Cl: 1.19, 2.14; P < 0.01), Rash (OR: 2.23; 95 % Cl: 1.62, 3.05; P < 0.001) and Vomiting (OR: 5.12; 95 % Cl: 3.36, 7.80; P < 0.001). The Serious adverse events of the treatment group were remarkably greater compared with the untreated group (OR: 1.60; 95 % Cl: 1.19, 2.14; P < 0.01).

Conclusion

The study results proposed that proteasome inhibitors are effective in the multiple myeloma maintenance treatment compared with the placebo group. Bortezomib has certain advantages in prolonging PFS, followed by ixazomib and carfilzomib in terms of efficacy. Bortezombib may be superior to carfilzombib in extending OS. However, the adverse reactions caused by proteasome inhibitors, such as Peripheral neuropathy, Serious adverse events, Rash, Vomiting, etc., should be paid enough attention.

Maintenance therapy for cytogenetically high-risk multiple myeloma: landscape in the era of novel drugs

Although the significant strides in novel therapeutic approaches have prolonged the survival of multiple myeloma (MM) patients, the unfavorable prognosis of cytogenetically high-risk newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) remains intractable with the lack of consensus regarding the choice of maintenance regimens. Therefore, this study was initiated with the aim of examining the effectiveness of various maintenance treatments for this group of patients in jeopardy. Overall, 17 studies with 1937 high-risk NDMM patients were included in the network meta-analysis. Combination therapies involving novel drugs presented encouraging prospects in the maintenance phase, while the patients and circumstances for the application of different regimens still needed to be further distinguished and clarified. To investigate the current status of maintenance therapy of high-risk NDMM patients in clinical practice, a real-world cohort of high-risk NDMM was retrospectively incorporated 80 patients with lenalidomide maintenance and 53 patients with bortezomib maintenance, presenting the median PFS of 31.7 months and 30.4 months, respectively (p = 0.874, HR = 0.966, 95% CI: 0.628-1.486). Collectively, this study illuminated the present constraints of conventional approaches during the maintenance phase for high-risk NDMM patients while highlighting the future potential associated with enhanced regimens integrating novel medications.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Phase 3 Clinical Trials for Blood Cancers: A Systematic Review

Importance

Published research suggests that patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are neither commonly collected nor reported in randomized clinical trials (RCTs) for solid tumors. Little is known about these practices in RCTs for hematological malignant neoplasms.

Objective

To evaluate the prevalence of PROs as prespecified end points in RCTs of hematological malignant neoplasms, and to assess reporting of PROs in associated trial publications.

Evidence Review

All issues of 8 journals known for publishing high-impact RCTs (NEJM, Lancet, Lancet Hematology, Lancet Oncology, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Blood, JAMA, and JAMA Oncology) between January 1, 2018, and December 13, 2022, were searched for primary publications of therapeutic phase 3 trials for adults with hematological malignant neoplasms. Studies that evaluated pretransplant conditioning regimens, graft-vs-host disease treatment, or radiotherapy as experimental treatment were excluded. Data regarding trial characteristics and PROs were extracted from manuscripts and trial protocols. Univariable analyses assessed associations between trial characteristics and PRO collection or reporting.

Findings

Ninety RCTs were eligible for analysis. PROs were an end point in 66 (73%) trials: in 1 trial (1%) as a primary end point, in 50 (56%) as a secondary end point, and in 15 (17%) as an exploratory end point. PRO data were reported in 26 of 66 primary publications (39%): outcomes were unchanged in 18 and improved in 8, with none reporting worse PROs with experimental treatment. Trials sponsored by for-profit entities were more likely to include PROs as an end point (49 of 55 [89%] vs 17 of 35 [49%]; P < .001) but were not significantly more likely to report PRO data (20 of 49 [41%] vs 6 of 17 [35%]; P = .69). Compared with trials involving lymphoma (18 of 29 [62%]) or leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome (18 of 28 [64%]), those involving plasma cell disorders or multiple myeloma (27 of 30 [90%]) or myeloproliferative neoplasms (3 of 3 [100%]) were more likely to include PROs as an end point (P = .03). Similarly, compared with trials involving lymphoma (3 of 18 [17%]) or leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome (5 of 18 [28%]), those involving plasma cell disorders or multiple myeloma (16 of 27 [59%]) or myeloproliferative neoplasms (2 of 3 [67%]) were more likely to report PROs in the primary publication (P = .01).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this systematic review, almost 3 of every 4 therapeutic RCTs for blood cancers collected PRO data; however, only 1 RCT included PROs as a primary end point. Moreover, most did not report resulting PRO data in the primary publication and when reported, PROs were either better or unchanged, raising concern for publication bias. This analysis suggests a critical gap in dissemination of data on the lived experiences of patients enrolled in RCTs for hematological malignant neoplasms.

Autologous HSCT with novel agent-based induction and consolidation followed by lenalidomide maintenance for untreated multiple myeloma

Triplet regimen comprising proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and dexamethasone (DEX) is a recommended induction/consolidation therapy for multiple myeloma (MM) patients eligible for transplant. In this Japanese phase II study conducted from 2017 to 2019, newly diagnosed MM patients aged 20-65 received four induction cycles with bortezomib (Bor), lenalidomide (Len), and DEX (VRD), followed by Bor and high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell rescue. Subsequently, they underwent four consolidation cycles with carfilzomib, Len, and DEX (KRD), followed by Len maintenance until disease progression. A total of 141 patients were analyzed. In an intent-to-treat population, the complete or better response post induction was 19.9%, rising to 39.7%, 58.9%, and 62.4% after transplant, consolidation, and 1-year maintenance, respectively. With a median follow-up of 38 months, the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 83.5% and the 3-year overall survival rate was 92.5%. Severe adverse events (≥grade 3) occurred in ~30% of patients; however, there was no treatment-related mortality. These findings clearly showed the tolerability and effectiveness of this protocol. Nevertheless, patients with high-risk cytogenetics showed a trend toward lower 3-year PFS than those without (77.8% vs. 89.4%, p = 0.051), and ultra-high-risk cytogenetics (≥2 high-risk cytogenetics) had an even worse prognosis, with 61.2% 3-year PFS. To overcome this situation, a more potent treatment strategy incorporating novel agents such as the CD38-antibody should be assessed in future studies.

Real-World Outcomes in Transplant-Ineligible Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Treated With Bortezomib/Cyclophosphamide/Dexamethasone and Bortezomib/Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone as Upfront Treatment

Introduction Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological disorder characterized by aberrant multiplication of malignant plasma cells in the bone marrow. The current mainstay of treatment for patients with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) is a triplet regimen with a proteasome inhibitor, immunomodulatory imide, and dexamethasone. The two most common of these triplet regimens are VLD (bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone) and VCD (bortezomib/cyclophosphamide/dexamethasone). This study aims to compare the outcomes between these two therapies in transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM. Methods We conducted a retrospective study at the Aga Khan University Hospital in Karachi, Pakistan. All NDMM transplant-ineligible patients either receiving VLD or VCD therapy between January 2015 and December 2022 were included in our study. Hematological parameters before and after treatment were obtained from hospital records. Response to treatment was classified according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) response criteria as either complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), partial response (PR), minimal response (MR), stable disease (SD), or progressive disease (PD). The response to treatment as well as overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) was compared between VCD and VLD therapy. A p-value of 0.05 or less was taken to be statistically significant. Results Twenty (23.8%) patients in the VCD group and 20 (23.0%) in the VLD group underwent complete remission. Seven (8.3%) patients experienced disease progression in the VCD group, while the figure stood at three (3.4%) in the VLD group. There was no statistically significant difference in the overall response rate between the VCD (58; 69.0%) and VLD (70; 80.5%) groups (p=0.086), a difference that was not statistically significant on the Chi-square test. OS was comparable between VCD (69.1 months, 95%CI: 61.3-77.0) and VLD (76.9 months, 95%CI: 69.0-85.0) therapies. Conclusions The study did not identify any statistically significant distinction in the treatment outcomes between the VCD and VLD regimens among NDMM patients ineligible for transplantation. Nevertheless, the study highlights the positive outcomes observed with both treatments in this specific patient cohort. This implies that either regimen could be deemed suitable as a treatment option for patients in low- and middle-income countries. Since both regimens demonstrate comparable effectiveness, assessing the cost-effectiveness of these regimens is crucial. Future research should also explore the economic aspects of the two treatment options.

Role of Consolidation and Maintenance

Consolidation therapy consists of short-term therapy after stem cell transplant in multiple myeloma. Key consolidation trials have shown mixed results on whether consolidation should be included after transplant, leading to varied clinical practice. Maintenance therapy consists of long-term, typically fixed-duration or indefinite, therapy. Standard-risk patients typically receive single-agent therapy, whereas high-risk may benefit from doublet therapy and beyond. Adverse events and quality of life concerns should be considered, as optimal duration of maintenance therapy continues to be studied.

The role of maintenance therapy following autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: Considerations on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT

Recent treatment advancements in multiple myeloma have led to significant improvements in patient outcomes. Maintenance therapy following autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHCT) is now standard of care and has been demonstrated to prolong and deepen treatment responses. Currently, lenalidomide remains the single agent that has been approved for maintenance post-AHCT in Europe and the USA which, if tolerated, is continued until disease progression. The treatment landscape is rapidly expanding however, and the optimal personalised maintenance approach for a patient is becoming more complex. Treatment outcomes for patients with high-risk disease remain poor and choice of maintenance in this population also remains unclear. This review article evaluates up-to-date literature regarding established maintenance approaches. It further analyses ongoing studies exploring maintenance regimens using combination and novel agents, approaches to maintenance in patients with cytogenetic high-risk disease and minimal residual disease response-adapted strategies that reflect the current evolving treatment paradigm.

Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone (IRD) Treatment with Cytogenetic Risk-Based Maintenance in Transplant-Eligible Myeloma: A Phase 2 Multicenter Study by the Nordic Myeloma Study Group

Scarce data exist on double maintenance in transplant-eligible high-risk (HR) newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. This prospective phase 2 study enrolled 120 transplant-eligible NDMM patients. The treatment consisted of four cycles of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRD) induction plus autologous stem cell transplantation followed by IRD consolidation and cytogenetic risk-based maintenance therapy with lenalidomide + ixazomib (IR) for HR patients and lenalidomide (R) alone for NHR patients. The main endpoint of the study was undetectable minimal residual disease (MRD) with sensitivity of <10-5 by flow cytometry at any time, and other endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We present the preplanned analysis after the last patient has been two years on maintenance. At any time during protocol treatment, 28% (34/120) had MRD < 10-5 at least once. At two years on maintenance, 66% of the patients in the HR group and 76% in the NHR group were progression-free (p = 0.395) and 36% (43/120) were CR or better, of which 42% (18/43) had undetectable flow MRD <10-5. Altogether 95% of the patients with sustained MRD <10-5, 82% of the patients who turned MRD-positive, and 61% of those with positive MRD had no disease progression at two years on maintenance (p < 0.001). To conclude, prolonged maintenance with all-oral ixazomib plus lenalidomide might improve PFS in HR patients.

Long-Term Outcomes of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Newly Diagnosed POEMS Syndrome

POEMS (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, monoclonal gammopathy, and skin changes) syndrome is a rare form of plasma cell dyscrasia often treated with high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). ASCT has resulted in satisfactory and sustained therapeutic outcomes. However, a substantial number of patients eventually experience disease progression, requiring second-line treatment. Therefore, it would be of further benefit to identify patients who will acquire the best long-term survival after ASCT. The aim of this study was to fully reveal the outcomes of patients undergoing ASCT in a large series with long-term follow-up. Long-term outcomes of 239 patients with newly diagnosed POEMS syndrome undergoing ASCT at a single center were evaluated retrospectively. Rates of hematologic complete response (CRH) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) complete response (CRV) were 57.3% and 68.6%, respectively, with 90.5% of patients achieving an overall clinical response. At a median follow-up of 94 months, the 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 92.8%, and the 5-year time to next-line treatment (TTNT) rate was 72.2% (median TTNT, 96 months). Patients achieving CRH (5-year TTNT rate, 82.5% versus 60.7%; P < .0001) or CRV (5-year TTNT rate 83.7% versus 54.2%; P < .0001) had better survival outcomes compared to non-CR group patients. Dual hematologic and VEGF complete responses carry further benefit for survival (median TTNT, 129 months versus 68 months; P < .0001). Seven cases of second primary malignancy were recorded, all of which were solid tumors. Front-line ASCT resulted in excellent long-term survival in patients with POEMS syndrome, with the best survival observed in those achieving dual hematologic and VEGF CRs.

Contribution of post-transplantation therapy to sustained MRD negativity in multiple myeloma: a retrospective analysis

Post-transplantation therapy is commonly performed in patients with myeloma and can prolong progression-free survival (PFS). However, whether post-transplantation therapy contributes to achieving and continuing MRD-negativity remains controversial. This retrospective analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of post-transplantation therapy, including tandem autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), in myeloma patients. The subjects were 79 patients (median age: 62 years) who received induction therapy, including bortezomib and/or lenalidomide, of whom 58 underwent post-transplantation therapy. At the median follow-up time of 50 months, the 4-year PFS rate was significantly higher in patients who underwent post-transplantation therapy than those who did not (60.6% vs. 28.6%, P = 0.012). Multivariate analysis revealed post-transplantation therapy to be a significant prognostic factor for long PFS. Tandem ASCT followed by consolidation and/or maintenance therapies improved PFS and OS. The minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative rate was significantly higher in patients who underwent post-transplantation therapy than those who did not (50.9% vs. 16.7%, P = 0.006). Post-transplantation therapy contributed to sustained MRD-negativity, which predicted long PFS and overall survival. Patients frequently discontinued post-transplantation therapy due to adverse events within 4 months. In conclusion, post-transplantation therapy improved PFS and contributed to sustained MRD-negativity in myeloma patients.

Lenalidomide and dexamethasone maintenance with or without ixazomib, tailored by residual disease status in myeloma

From November 2014 to May 2017, 332 patients homogeneously treated with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRD) induction, autologous stem cell transplant, and VRD consolidation were randomly assigned to receive maintenance therapy with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (RD; 161 patients) vs RD plus ixazomib (IRD; 171 patients). RD consisted of lenalidomide 15 mg/d from days 1 to 21 plus dexamethasone 20 mg/d on days 1 to 4 and 9 to 12 at 4-week intervals, whereas in the IRD arm, oral ixazomib at a dose of 4 mg on days 1, 8, and 15 was added. Therapy for patients with negative measurable residual disease (MRD) after 24 cycles was discontinued, whereas those who tested positive for MRD remained on maintenance with RD for 36 more cycles. After a median follow-up of 69 months from the initiation of maintenance, the progression-free survival (PFS) was similar in both arms, with a 6-year PFS rate of 61.3% and 55.6% for RD and IRD, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.136; 95% confidence interval, 0.809-1.603). After 2 years of maintenance, treatment was discontinued in 163 patients with negative MRD, whereas 63 patients with positive MRD continued with RD therapy. Maintenance discontinuation in patients tested negative for MRD resulted in a low progression rate (17.2% at 4 years), even in patients with high-risk features. In summary, our results show the efficacy of RD maintenance and support the safety of maintenance therapy discontinuation in patients with negative MRD at 2 years. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02406144 and at EudraCT as 2014-00055410.

Efficacy of Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Myeloma Patients with Suboptimal Response: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis

Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard of care for myeloma patients who achieve partial response (PR) or better after induction therapy. However, its clinical significance in patients with suboptimal response (SR) before ASCT, including stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD), has not been established. Additionally, functional high-risk, including SR and early PD within 12 months, was a poor prognostic factor up to now. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of ASCT in myeloma patients with SR in the novel agent era. This multicenter retrospective study was conducted using the Transplant Registry Unified Management Program database of the Japanese Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy and included 3898 transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who underwent ASCT between 2007 and 2020 and were followed up until 2021. The SR rate was 4.7%, including 1.7% with PD. In survival time analysis for overall cases, a significant difference in PFS between the very good partial response (VGPR) and PR groups was observed, whereas there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the VGPR and PR groups. Additionally, there was no significant difference in OS or PFS between the PR and SD groups. Therefore, we focused on the PR, SD, and PD groups, as the purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the clinical significance of ASCT in patients with SR compared with those with PR. The median patient age was 60 years (range, 30 to 77 years). In total, 1605 (97.4%) patients received bortezomib, 561 (38.2%) received an immunomodulatory drug (ImiD), and 512 (34.9%) received both bortezomib and an ImiD. A total of 558 patients (38.0%) received reinduction therapy. There were 229 patients (37.7%) with high-risk cytogenetics (HRCA). With a median follow-up of 31.7 months, there was a significant difference in 30-month OS rates among the PR, SD, and PD groups (86.3%, 78.5%, and 39.4%, respectively; P <.001). OS was significantly shorter in the SD group compared to the PR group among the patients with HRCA (P < .001) and patients treated with reinduction therapy (P = .013). In the PD group, the 30-month OS and PFS rates were 39.4% and 17.9%, respectively. Finally, early PD within 12 months after ASCT was predictive of short OS, whereas OS without early PD even in the PD group was similar to that in the SD and PR groups. In conclusion, OS in the SR group was not always short, but SR in the HRCA and the reinduction therapy groups was predictive of short OS, so that therapeutic alternatives to ASCT are needed. OS in the PD group was significantly short, but ASCT improved clinical outcomes when early PD did not occur even in the PD group.

Treatment of multiple myeloma based on autologous stem cell transplant: An overview of systematic reviews

BACKGROUND

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant plasma cell disease. In recent years, several systematic reviews, and meta-analyses have been published on treatment protocols, including autologous stem cell transplantation for MM.

METHODS

Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched to systematically summarize the quality of the methodology and evidence of meta-analyses regarding treatment of MM including autologous stem cell transplantation.

RESULTS

Total 11 meta-analyses were included. The preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses evaluation revealed that the quality of included reviews was affected by possible unevaluated bias between studies and the lack of protocol and registration. The AMSTAR2 scale indicated that the quality of the methodology of included reviews ranged from very low to moderate. The grading, assessment, development, and evaluation of recommendations evaluation showed that among the included outcome indicators, most of them are of low quality.

CONCLUSION

This overview suggested that the combination of drugs has improved patient survival rates, efficacy and safety compared with the standard regimen. However, the strength of the evidence is uneven and due to methodological errors, the results should be interpreted with caution in order to provide a reference for further improvement of the study design. The methodological quality of the relevant meta-analysis needs to be further improved.

Real-world data on the effectiveness and safety of Ixazomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients: a multicenter experience in Turkey

A multicenter, retrospective, observational study was conducted to explore effectiveness and safety of ixazomib plus lenalidomide with dexamethasone (IRd) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients following at least ≥ two lines of therapy. Patients' treatment responses, overall response rate, progression-free survival rate, and adverse events were recorded. Mean age of 54 patients was 66.5 ± 9.1 years. There were 20 patients (37.0%) with progression. Median progression-free survival was 13 months in patients who received a median of three therapy lines in a 7.5-month follow-up period. Overall response rate was 38.5%. Of 54 patients, 19 (40.4%) had at least one adverse event, and nine (19.1%) had an adverse event of at least grade 3 or more. Of 72 adverse events observed in 47 patients, 68% were grade 1 or 2. Treatment was not stopped in any patient due to adverse events. IRd combination therapy was effective and safe in heavily treated RRMM patients.

Ixazomib, daratumumab and low-dose dexamethasone in intermediate-fit patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: an open-label phase 2 trial

Background

The outcome of non-transplant eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients is heterogeneous, partly depending on frailty level. The aim of this study was to prospectively investigate the efficacy and safety of Ixazomib-Daratumumab-low-dose dexamethasone (Ixa-Dara-dex) in NDMM intermediate-fit patients.

Methods

In this phase II multicenter HOVON-143 study, IMWG Frailty index based intermediate-fit patients, were treated with 9 induction cycles of Ixa-Dara-dex, followed by maintenance with ID for a maximum of 2 years. The primary endpoint was overall response rate on induction treatment. Patients were included from October 2017 until May 2019. Trial Registration Number: NTR6297.

Findings

Sixty-five patients were included. Induction therapy resulted in an overall response rate of 71%. Early mortality was 1.5%. At a median follow-up of 41.0 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was 18.2 months and 3-year overall survival 83%. Discontinuation of therapy occurred in 77% of patients, 49% due to progression, 9% due to toxicity, 8% due to incompliance, 3% due to sudden death and 8% due to other reasons. Dose modifications of ixazomib were required frequently (37% and 53% of patients during induction and maintenance, respectively), mainly due to, often low grade, polyneuropathy. During maintenance 23% of patients received daratumumab alone. Global quality of life (QoL) improved significantly and was clinically relevant, which persisted during maintenance treatment.

Interpretation

Ixazomib-Daratumumab-low-dose dexamethasone as first line treatment in intermediate-fit NDMM patients is safe and improves global QoL. However, efficacy was limited, partly explained by ixazomib-induced toxicity, hampering long term tolerability of this 3-drug regimen. This highlights the need for more efficacious and tolerable regimens improving the outcome in vulnerable intermediate-fit patients.

Funding

Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited.

Breaking through Multiple Myeloma: A Paradigm for a Comprehensive Tumor Ecosystem Targeting

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a cancerous condition characterized by the proliferation of plasma cells within the hematopoietic marrow, resulting in multiple osteolytic lesions. MM patients typically experience bone pain, kidney damage, fatigue due to anemia, and infections. Historically, MM was an incurable disease with a life expectancy of around three years after diagnosis. However, over the past two decades, the development of novel therapeutics has significantly improved patient outcomes, including response to treatment, remission duration, quality of life, and overall survival. These advancements include thalidomide and its derivatives, lenalidomide and pomalidomide, which exhibit diverse mechanisms of action against the plasma cell clone. Additionally, proteasome inhibitors such as bortezomib, ixazomib, and carfilzomib disrupt protein degradation, proving specifically toxic to cancerous plasma cells. Recent advancements also involve monoclonal antibodies targeting surface antigens, such as elotuzumab (anti-CS1) and daratumumab (anti-CD38), bispecific t-cell engagers such as teclistamab (anti-BCMA/CD3) and Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T)-based strategies, with a growing focus on drugs that exhibit increasingly targeted action against neoplastic plasma cells and relevant effects on the tumor microenvironment.

[Multiple Myeloma Treatment Guidelines by the Portuguese Group of Multiple Myeloma]

The treatment of multiple myeloma has profoundly changed with the introduction of several innovative therapies. The optimization of therapeutic sequencing through the combined use of the various drugs developed in recent years and the attention given to the characteristics of patients have allowed the reduction of toxicities and increased survival and quality of life of patients with multiple myeloma. These treatment recommendations from the Portuguese Multiple Myeloma Group offer guidance for first-line treatment and progression/relapse situations. These recommendations are given highlighting the data that justify each choice and referring to the respective levels of evidence that support these options. Whenever possible, the respective national regulatory framework is presented. These recommendations constitute an advance towards the best treatment of multiple myeloma in Portugal.

First-line treatment of multiple myeloma in both transplant and non-transplant candidates

INTRODUCTION

The last decade's progress in the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma has relied on the synergistic combination of agents with different mechanisms of action, basically proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents, and monoclonal antibodies, in order to achieve the deepest possible response early in the course of treatment. Following induction, several therapeutic strategies aim to improve and maintain response.

AREAS COVERED

The manuscript reviews available data for the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients with a focus on most recent induction and maintenance combinations and the still important role of autologous stem transplantation. Future perspectives in the light of initial results from ongoing clinical trials are also addressed.

EXPERT OPINION

Remarkable progress has been made in myeloma treatment due to the integration of immunomodulators, proteasome inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, and high dose therapy in the frontline setting. Upfront therapy may be further improved intensifying induction combinations, adapting high dose therapy and consolidation strategies to the patient's profile, improving maintenance in high-risk individuals, or limiting maintenance duration in those with a better prognosis. Evidence needs to be reviewed, taking into account the therapeutic objectives at each treatment stage and patient specific risk factors.

Ixazomib Versus Placebo as Postinduction Maintenance Therapy in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Patients: An Analysis by Age and Frailty Status of the TOURMALINE-MM4 Study

BACKGROUND

The TOURMALINE-MM4 trial demonstrated a significant and clinically meaningful progression-free survival (PFS) benefit with ixazomib versus placebo as postinduction maintenance in nontransplant, newly-diagnosed multiple myeloma patients, with a manageable and well-tolerated toxicity profile.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this subgroup analysis, efficacy and safety were assessed by age (< 65, 65-74, and ≥ 75 years) and frailty status (fit, intermediate-fit, and frail).

RESULTS

In this analysis, PFS benefit with ixazomib versus placebo was seen across age subgroups, including patients aged < 65 years (hazard ratio [HR], 0.576; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.299-1.108; P = .095), 65-74 years (HR, 0.615; 95% CI, 0.467-0.810; P < .001), and ≥ 75 years (HR, 0.740; 95% CI, 0.537-1.019; P = .064). PFS benefit was also seen across frailty subgroups, including fit (HR, 0.530; 95% CI, 0.387-0.727; P < .001), intermediate-fit (HR, 0.746; 95% CI, 0.526-1.058; P = .098), and frail (HR, 0.733; 95% CI, 0.481-1.117; P = .147) patients. With ixazomib versus placebo, rates of grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 28-44% vs. 10-36%), serious TEAEs (15-29% vs. 3-29%), and discontinuation due to TEAEs (7-19% vs. 5-11%) were higher or similar across age and frailty subgroups, and generally somewhat higher in older age groups and intermediate-fit/frail patients in both arms. Treatment with ixazomib versus placebo did not adversely affect patient-reported quality-of-life scores across age and frailty status subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Ixazomib is a feasible and effective maintenance option for prolonging PFS across this heterogeneous patient population.

A Multicenter Phase II, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Maintenance Ixazomib After Allogeneic Transplantation for High-Risk Multiple Myeloma: Results of the Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network 1302 Trial

The role of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) followed by maintenance therapy in high-risk multiple myeloma (MM) remains controversial. We evaluated the efficacy of ixazomib maintenance therapy after reduced-intensity conditioning allo-HCT from HLA-matched donors in patients with high-risk MM. The primary study endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) postrandomization, treated as a time to event. Secondary endpoints were grade II-IV and grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host-disease (GVHD), chronic GVHD, best response, disease progression, nonrelapse mortality (NRM), overall survival (OS), toxicity, infection, and health-related quality of life. In this phase 2, double-blinded, prospective multicenter trial, we randomized patients with high-risk MM (ie, those with poor-risk cytogenetics, plasma cell leukemia, or relapsing within 24 months after autologous HCT) to ixazomib (3 mg on days 1, 8, and 15) or placebo after allo-HCT. The conditioning regimen included fludarabine/melphalan/bortezomib with tacrolimus plus methotrexate for GVHD. Fifty-seven patients were enrolled, of whom 52 (91.2%) underwent allo-HCT and 43 (82.7%) were randomized to ixazomib versus placebo. At 21 months postrandomization, the ixazomib and placebo groups had similar PFS (55.3% versus 59.1%; P = 1.00) and OS (94.7% versus 86.4%; P = .17). The cumulative incidences of grade III-IV acute GVHD at 100 days (9.5% versus 0%) and chronic GVHD at 12 months (68.6% versus 63.6%) also were similar in the 2 groups. The secondary analysis showed that at 24 months post-allo-HCT, PFS and OS were 52% and 82%, respectively, with a corresponding NRM of 11.7%. These results demonstrate the safety and durable disease control with allo-HCT in high-risk MM patients. We could not adequately assess the efficacy of ixazomib maintenance because the trial terminated early owing to enrollment delays, but there was no indication of any impact on outcomes.

Impact of newly diagnosed extramedullary myeloma on outcome after first autograft followed by maintenance: A CMWP-EBMT study

BACKGROUND

No adequate data exist on the impact of multiple myeloma (MM) with extramedullary disease (EMD) after autograft and maintenance therapy.

METHODS

We identified 808 patients with newly diagnosed MM who received first autograft, of whom 107 had EMD (83 paraskeletal and 24 organ involvement), and who had been reported to the EBMT registry December 2018. Distribution according to type of involvement was similar between the treatment groups (p = .69). For EMD, 46 (40%) received thalidomide, 59 (51%) lenalidomide, and 11 (10%) bortezomib.

RESULTS

The median follow-up from maintenance start was 44 months. Three-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 52% (48%-57%) for no EMD, 56% (44%-69%) for paraskeletal involvement, and 45% (22%-68%) for organ involvement (p = .146). Early PFS (within first year) appeared to be significantly worse for organ involvement (hazard ratio, 3.40), while no significant influence was found after first year from maintenance start. Three-year overall survival (OS) was 81% (77%-84%), 88% (80%-96%), and 68% (47%-89%; p = .064), respectively. With thalidomide as reference, lenalidomide was significantly associated with better PFS and OS, whereas bortezomib appeared to improve outcome specifically in EMD.

CONCLUSION

Lenalidomide maintenance is standard of care for MM without EMD, whereas extramedullary organ involvement remains a significant risk factor for worse outcome, especially for early events after maintenance start.

Maintenance therapy after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma

In the last two decades, proteasome inhibitors (PIs), immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), and monoclonal antibodies have greatly improved the overall survival of patients with multiple myeloma. However, multiple myeloma remains incurable, and high-risk patients have poor long-term survival. Although allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is not considered standard therapy because of relatively high transplant-related mortality and relapse rates, the graft-versus-myeloma (GVM) effect makes it a potentially curative therapy. Therefore, allo-HCT remains a treatment option for younger patients and those with high-risk myeloma. Maintenance therapy with novel agents has recently been attempted to reduce relapse in patients undergoing allo-HCT, but its effectiveness remains unclear. This review focuses on the role of maintenance therapy after allo-HCT in patients with myeloma. Maintenance therapy using IMiDs and/or PIs after allo-HCT may be effective in reducing relapse or improving response because it may prevent early progression before achievement of the GVM effect or enhance the GVM effect. However, care must be taken to avoid complications, such as graft-versus-host disease. Further studies are necessary to determine the optimal maintenance drugs, drug combinations, dosing, start timing, and number of cycles.

Increased Bone Volume by Ixazomib in Multiple Myeloma: 3-Month Results from an Open Label Phase 2 Study

Multiple myeloma (MM) is an incurable bone marrow cancer characterized by the development of osteolytic lesions due to the myeloma-induced increase in osteoclastogenesis and decrease in osteoblastic activity. The standard treatment of MM often involves proteasome inhibitors (PIs), which can also have a beneficial off-target bone anabolic effect. However, long-term treatment with PIs is unadvised due to their high side-effect burden and inconvenient route of administration. Ixazomib is a new-generation, oral PI that is generally well tolerated; however, its bone effect remains unknown. Here, we describe the 3-month results of a single-center phase II clinical trial investigating the effect of ixazomib treatment on bone formation and bone microstructure. Thirty patients with MM in stable disease not receiving antimyeloma treatment for ≥3 months and presenting ≥2 osteolytic lesions received monthly ixazomib treatment cycles. Serum and plasma samples were collected at baseline and monthly thereafter. Sodium ¹⁸ F-Fluoride positron emission tomography (NaF-PET) whole-body scans and trephine iliac crest bone biopsies were collected before and after three treatment cycles. The serum levels of bone remodeling biomarkers suggested an early ixazomib-induced decrease in bone resorption. NaF-PET scans indicated unchanged bone formation ratios; however, histological analyses of bone biopsies revealed a significant increase in bone volume per total volume after treatment. Further analyses of bone biopsies showed unchanged osteoclast number and COLL1A1^High -expressing osteoblasts on bone surfaces. Next, we analyzed the superficial bone structural units (BSUs), which represent each recent microscopic bone remodeling event. Osteopontin staining revealed that following treatment, significantly more BSUs were enlarged (>200,000 μm² ), and the distribution frequency of their shape was significantly different from baseline. Overall, our data suggest that ixazomib induces overflow remodeling-based bone formation by decreasing the level of bone resorption and promoting longer bone formation events, making it a potentially valuable candidate for future maintenance treatment. © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Real world outcomes of lenalidomide or bortezomib maintenance in patients with multiple myeloma not undergoing stem cell transplantation

Maintenance is one form of long-term therapies in multiple myeloma (MM). Lenalidomide and bortezomib are two commonly used options. The role of maintenance in patients not undergoing transplant remains unclear. A total of 248 newly diagnosed MM patients who received over 180 days of any standard-of-care induction therapy and did not receive autologous stem cell transplantation were included. Patients either receive lenalidomide, bortezomib or no maintenance. Patterns of usage, survival benefit, discontinuation status were analyzed. 93, 99 and 56 patients received no, lenalidomide (Len) and bortezomib (Bor) maintenance respectively. Patients receiving Bor had a higher incidence of traditional high-risk cytogenetics (14.0% (No) vs 14.1% (Len) vs 41.1% (Bor), P < 0.001). Len maintenance conferred a superior progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to no maintenance (median PFS, 60.1 vs 26.9 months, P = 0.003; median OS, NR vs 56.7 months, P = 0.046), with a near independent impact on PFS (adjusted HR 0.580, P = 0.058). The PFS and OS benefit of Len maintenance was seen in subgroups of ISS stage I/II, traditional standard-risk cytogenetics, and pre-maintenance < CR. Bor maintenance did not confer PFS or OS benefit for the entire cohort, but improved OS in patients with pre-maintenance < CR. Discontinuation due to toxicity was recorded in 11.1% and 8.9% of patients receiving Len or Bor maintenance respectively. Our study supports lenalidomide maintenance as the standard-of-care in MM patients not undergoing transplant. Further studies are warranted for bortezomib maintenance in the non-transplant setting, and better maintenance strategy is needed for patients with adverse prognostic factors.

A minimally invasive tubular retractor-assisted retropleural approach for thoracic disc herniations - case series and technical note

PURPOSE

Thoracic disc herniations are uncommon and carry a high risk for neurological deterioration. Traditional surgical approaches include thoracotomy, costotransversectomy or posterior approaches with considerable morbidity. In this technical note with case series, we describe a minimally invasive tubular retractor-assisted retropleural approach for simple and less invasive microsurgical exploration of thoracic disc herniations from a lateral angle.

METHODS

Surgical technique consisted of partial rib resection and retropleural dissection followed by the placement of a tubular retractor (METRx Tubes, Medtronic) for an anterior-lateral exposure of the disc and neuroforamen. Epidemiological, clinical and surgical patient data were acquired.

RESULTS

Between 2017 and 2020, six patients were surgically treated using the minimally invasive tubular retractor-assisted retropleural approach. Microsurgical exposure of the disc and neural structures was achieved from a lateral direction without requiring thoracotomy or lung deflation. Control imaging confirmed resection in all cases without relevant residuum. As postoperative complications, one dural injury and one postoperative pneumothorax occured. No neurologic deterioration or recurrence occurred during a median follow-up of 3 months.

CONCLUSION

The described tubular retractor-assisted retropleural exposure serves as a feasible minimally invasive microsurgical approach to the anterior-lateral thoracic spine.

MRD dynamics during maintenance for improved prognostication of 1280 patients with myeloma in the TOURMALINE-MM3 and -MM4 trials

Measurable residual disease (MRD) evaluation may help to guide treatment duration in multiple myeloma (MM). Paradoxically, limited longitudinal data exist on MRD during maintenance. We investigated the prognostic value of MRD dynamics in 1280 transplant-eligible and -ineligible patients from the TOURMALINE-MM3 and -MM4 randomized placebo-controlled phase 3 studies of 2-year ixazomib maintenance. MRD status at randomization showed independent prognostic value (median progression-free survival [PFS], 38.6 vs 15.6 months in MRD- vs MRD+ patients; HR, 0.47). However, MRD dynamics during maintenance provided more detailed risk stratification. A 14-month landmark analysis showed prolonged PFS in patients converting from MRD+ to MRD- status vs those with persistent MRD+ status (76.8% vs 27.6% 2-year PFS rates). Prolonged PFS was observed in patients with sustained MRD- status vs those converting from MRD- to MRD+ status (75.0% vs 34.2% 2-year PFS rates). Similar results were observed at a 28-month landmark analysis. Ixazomib maintenance vs placebo improved PFS in patients who were MRD+ at randomization (median, 18.8 vs 11.6 months; HR, 0.65) or at the 14-month landmark (median, 16.8 vs 10.6 months; HR, 0.65); no difference was observed in patients who were MRD-. This is the largest MM population undergoing yearly MRD evaluation during maintenance reported to date. We demonstrate the limited prognostic value of a single-time point MRD evaluation, because MRD dynamics over time substantially impact PFS risk. These findings support MRD- status as a relevant end point during maintenance and confirm the increased progression risk in patients converting to MRD+ from MRD- status. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02181413 and #NCT02312258.

Upfront autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation versus carfilzomib-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone consolidation with carfilzomib maintenance in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in England and Wales (CARDAMON): a randomised, phase 2, non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND

Standard-of-care treatment for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma is bortezomib-based induction followed by high-dose melphalan and autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) and lenalidomide maintenance. We aimed to evaluate whether an immunomodulatory-free carfilzomib-based induction, consolidation, and maintenance protocol without autologous HSCT was non-inferior to the same induction regimen followed by autologous HSCT and maintenance.

METHODS

CARDAMON is a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial in 19 hospitals in England and Wales, UK. Newly diagnosed, transplantation-eligible patients with multiple myeloma aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2 received four 28-day cycles of carfilzomib (56 mg/m² intravenously on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16), cyclophosphamide (500 mg orally on days 1, 8, and 15), and dexamethasone (40 mg orally on days 1, 8, 15, and 22; KCd), followed by peripheral blood stem cell mobilisation. Patients with at least a partial response were randomly assigned (1:1) to either high-dose melphalan and autologous HSCT or four cycles of KCd. All randomised patients received 18 cycles of carfilzomib maintenance (56 mg/m² intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15). The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients with at least a very good partial response after induction and difference in progression-free survival rate at 2 years from randomisation (non-inferiority margin 10%), both assessed by intention to treat. Safety was assessed in all patients who started treatment. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02315716); recruitment is complete and all patients are in follow-up.

FINDINGS

Between June 16, 2015, and July 8, 2019, 281 patients were enrolled, with 218 proceeding to randomisation (109 assigned to the KCd consolidation group [99 of whom completed consolidation] and 109 to the HSCT group [104 of whom underwent transplantation]). A further seven patients withdrew before initiation of carfilzomib maintenance (two in the KCd consolidation group vs five in the HSCT group). Median age was 59 years (IQR 52 to 64); 166 (59%) of 281 patients were male and 115 (41%) were female. 152 (71%) of 214 patients with known ethnicity were White, 37 (17%) were Black, 18 (8%) were Asian, 5 (2%) identified as Mixed, and 2 (1%) identified as other. Median follow-up from randomisation was 40·2 months (IQR 32·7 to 51·8). After induction, 162 (57·7%; 95% CI 51·6 to 63·5) of 281 patients had at least a very good partial response. The 2-year progression-free survival was 75% (95% CI 65 to 82) in the HSCT group versus 68% (95% CI 58 to 76) in the KCd group (difference -7·2%, 70% CI -11·1 to -2·8), exceeding the non-inferiority margin. The most common grade 3-4 events during KCd induction and consolidation were lymphocytopenia (72 [26%] of 278 patients who started induction; 15 [14%] of 109 patients who started consolidation) and infection (50 [18%] of 278 for induction; 15 [14%] of 109 for consolidation), and during carfilzomib maintenance were hypertension (20 [21%] of 97 patients in the KCd consolidation group vs 23 [23%] of 99 patients in the HSCT group) and infection (16 [16%] of 97 patients vs 25 [25%] of 99). Treatment-related serious adverse events at any point during the trial were reported in 109 (39%) of 278 patients who started induction, with infections (80 [29%]) being the most common. Treatment-emergent deaths were reported in five (2%) of 278 patients during induction (three from infection, one from cardiac event, and one from renal failure) and one of 99 patients during maintenance after autologous HSCT (oesophageal carcinoma).

INTERPRETATION

KCd did not meet the criteria for non-inferiority compared with autologous HSCT, but the marginal difference in progression-free survival suggests that further studies are warranted to explore deferred autologous HSCT in some subgroups, such as individuals who are MRD negative after induction.

FUNDING

Cancer Research UK and Amgen.

Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone or lenalidomide alone as maintenance therapy after autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma (ATLAS): interim analysis of a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Lenalidomide is a cornerstone of maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma after autologous stem-cell transplantation. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of maintenance therapy with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone versus lenalidomide alone in this patient population.

METHODS

This study is an interim analysis of ATLAS, which is an investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial in 12 academic and clinical centres in the USA and Poland. Participants were aged 18 years or older with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, completed any type of induction and had stable disease or better, autologous stem-cell transplantation within 100 days, initiated induction 12 months before enrolment, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using permuted blocks of sizes 4 and 6 and a web-based system to receive up to 36 cycles of carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (28-day cycles of carfilzomib 20 mg/m2 administered intravenously in cycle one on days 1 and 2 then 36 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 in cycles one to four and 36 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, 15, and 16 from cycle five up to 36 [per protocol]; lenalidomide 25 mg administered orally on days 1-21; and dexamethasone 20 mg administered orally on days 1, 8, 15, and 22) or lenalidomide alone (10 mg administered orally for the first three cycles and then at the best tolerated dose [≤15 mg for 28 days in 28-day cycles]) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity as maintenance therapy. After 36 cycles, patients in both treatment groups received lenalidomide maintenance. Randomisation was stratified by response to previous treatment, cytogenetic risk factors, and country. Investigators and patients were not masked to treatment allocation. Patients in the carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone group with no detectable minimal residual disease after cycle six (as per International Myeloma Working Group criteria) and standard-risk cytogenetics were switched to lenalidomide maintenance as of cycle nine. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population (defined as all randomly assigned patients). Safety was analysed in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This unplanned interim analysis was triggered by the occurrence of 59 (61%) of the expected 96 events for the primary analysis and the results are considered preliminary. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02659293 (active, not recruiting) and EudraCT, 2015-002380-42.

FINDINGS

Between June 10, 2016, and Oct 21, 2020, 180 patients were randomly assigned to receive either carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (n=93) or lenalidomide alone (n=87; intention-to-treat population). The median age of patients was 59·0 years (IQR 49·0-63·0); 84 (47%) patients were female and 96 (53%) were male. With a median follow-up of 33·8 months (IQR 20·9-42·9), median progression-free survival was 59·1 months (95% CI 54·8-not estimable) in the carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone group versus 41·4 months (33·2-65·4) in the lenalidomide group (hazard ratio 0·51 [95% CI 0·31-0·86]; p=0·012). The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were neutropenia (44 [48%] in the carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone group vs 52 [60%] in the lenalidomide group), thrombocytopenia (12 [13%] vs six [7%]), and lower respiratory tract infections (seven [8%] vs one [1%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 28 (30%) patients in the carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone group and 19 (22%) in the lenalidomide group. One treatment-related adverse event led to death (respiratory failure due to severe pneumonia) in the carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone group.

INTERPRETATION

This interim analysis provides support for considering carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who completed any induction regimen followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation, which requires confirmation after longer follow-up of this ongoing phase 3 trial.

FUNDING

Amgen and Celgene (Bristol Myers Squibb).

Cardiovascular Toxicity of Proteasome Inhibitors: Underlying Mechanisms and Management Strategies: JACC: CardioOncology State-of-the-Art Review

Proteasome inhibitors (PIs) are the backbone of combination treatments for patients with multiple myeloma and AL amyloidosis, while also indicated in Waldenström's macroglobulinemia and other malignancies. PIs act on proteasome peptidases, causing proteome instability due to accumulating aggregated, unfolded, and/or damaged polypeptides; sustained proteome instability then induces cell cycle arrest and/or apoptosis. Carfilzomib, an intravenous irreversible PI, exhibits a more severe cardiovascular toxicity profile as compared with the orally administered ixazomib or intravenous reversible PI such as bortezomib. Cardiovascular toxicity includes heart failure, hypertension, arrhythmias, and acute coronary syndromes. Because PIs are critical components of the treatment of hematological malignancies and amyloidosis, managing their cardiovascular toxicity involves identifying patients at risk, diagnosing toxicity early at the preclinical level, and offering cardioprotection if needed. Future research is required to elucidate underlying mechanisms, improve risk stratification, define the optimal management strategy, and develop new PIs with safe cardiovascular profiles.

A pooled analysis of outcomes according to cytogenetic abnormalities in patients receiving ixazomib- vs placebo-based therapy for multiple myeloma

Some cytogenetic abnormalities (CAs) are associated with poorer prognosis in multiple myeloma (MM); proteasome inhibitors appear to benefit patients with high-risk CAs. We evaluated 2247 MM patients from the TOURMALINE-MM1/-MM2/-MM3/-MM4 trials to assess the PFS benefit of ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) vs placebo-Rd (TOURMALINE-MM1/-MM2) or ixazomib vs placebo (TOURMALINE-MM3/-MM4) in specific high-risk CAs. After a pooled median follow-up of 25.6 months, the hazard ratio (HR) for PFS with ixazomib- vs placebo-based therapy for high-risk patients was 0.74 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-0.93; median PFS [mPFS] 17.8 vs 13.2 months), and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.62-0.80; mPFS 26.3 vs 17.6 months) for complementary standard-risk patients. The HR for expanded high-risk patients was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.64-0.87; mPFS 18.1 vs 14.1 months), and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.59-0.85; mPFS 36.1 vs 21.4 months) for complementary standard-risk patients. The HR for PFS with ixazomib- vs placebo-based therapy was 0.68 in patients with t(4;14) (95% CI: 0.48-0.96; mPFS 22.4 vs 13.2 months), and 0.77 for patients with amp1q21 (95% CI: 0.63-0.93; mPFS 18.8 vs 14.5 months). A PFS benefit was demonstrated with ixazomib- vs placebo-based therapy regardless of cytogenetic status, with greatest benefit observed in patients with t(4;14) and amp1q21.

Carfilzomib induction, consolidation, and maintenance with or without autologous stem-cell transplantation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: pre-planned cytogenetic subgroup analysis of the randomised, phase 2 FORTE trial

BACKGROUND

Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma and high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCA) represent an unmet medical need. In the FORTE trial, lenalidomide and dexamethasone plus carfilzomib (KRd) induction resulted in a higher proportion of patients with at least a very good partial response as compared with carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (KCd), and carfilzomib plus lenalidomide maintenance prolonged progression-free survival compared with lenalidomide maintenance. In this prespecified analysis of the FORTE trial, we described the outcomes of enrolled patients according to their cytogenetic risk.

METHODS

The UNITO-MM-01/FORTE was a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial done at 42 Italian academic and community practice centres, which enrolled transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma aged 18-65 years. Eligible patients had newly diagnosed multiple myeloma based on standard International Myeloma Working Group criteria, a Karnofsky performance status of at least 60%, and had not received any previous treatment with anti-myeloma therapy. At enrolment, patients were stratified according to International Staging System stage (I vs II/III) and age (<60 years vs 60-65 years) and randomly assigned (1:1:1) to KRd plus autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT; four 28-day induction cycles with KRd, melphalan at 200 mg/m² and ASCT [MEL200-ASCT], followed by four 28-day KRd consolidation cycles), 12 28-day KRd cycles, or KCd plus ASCT (four 28-day induction cycles with KCd, MEL200-ASCT, and four 28-day KCd consolidation cycles), using a web-based system (block randomisation, block size of 12). Carfilzomib was administered at 20 mg/m² on days 1 and 2 of cycle 1, followed by 36 mg/m² intravenously administered on days 8, 9, 15, and 16 of cycle 1, and then 36 mg/m² intravenously administered for all subsequent doses on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16; lenalidomide 25 mg was administered orally on days 1-21; cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m² was administered orally on days 1, 8, and 15; and dexamethasone 20 mg was administered orally or intravenously on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, and 23. After the consolidation phase, patients were stratified according to induction-consolidation treatment and randomly assigned (1:1; block size of 8) to maintenance treatment with carfilzomib plus lenalidomide or lenalidomide alone. Carfilzomib 36 mg/m² was administered intravenously on days 1-2 and days 15-16, every 28 days for up to 2 years, and lenalidomide 10 mg was administered orally on days 1-21 every 28 days until progression or intolerance in both groups. The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients with at least a very good partial response after induction with KRd versus KCd and progression-free survival with carfilzomib plus lenalidomide versus lenalidomide alone as maintenance treatment. In this preplanned analysis, we included patients enrolled in the FORTE trial with complete cytogenetic data on del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16), del(1p), gain(1q) (3 copies), and amp(1q) (≥4 copies) assessed by fluorescence in-situ hybridisation analysis on CD138-positive sorted cells. We assessed progression-free survival, overall survival, minimal residual disease negativity, and 1-year sustained minimal residual disease negativity according to the presence of zero, one, and two or more HRCA across treatment groups. The FORTE trial is ongoing, and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02203643.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 23, 2015, and April 5, 2017, 477 patients were enrolled, of whom 396 (83%) had complete cytogenetic data and were analysed (176 [44%] of whom were women and 220 [56%] were men). The median follow-up from first randomisation was 51 months (IQR 46-56). 4-year progression-free survival was 71% (95% CI 64-78) in patients with zero HRCA, 60% (95% CI 52-69) in patients with one HRCA, and 39% (95% CI 30-50) in patients with two or more HRCA. Compared with patients with zero HRCA, the risk of progression or death was similar in patients with one HRCA (hazard ratio [HR] 1·33 [95% CI 0·90-1·97]; p=0·15) and higher in patients with two or more HRCA (HR 2·56 [95% CI 1·74-3·75]); p<0·0001) across the induction-intensification-consolidation groups. Moreover, the risk of progression or death was also higher in patients with two or more HRCA versus those with one HRCA (HR 1·92 [95% CI 1·34-2·76]; p=0·0004). 4-year overall survival from the first randomisation was 94% (95% CI 91-98) in patients with zero HRCA, 83% (95% CI 76-90) in patients with one HRCA, and 63% (95% CI 54-74) in patients with two or more HRCA. Compared with patients with zero HRCA, the risk of death was significantly higher in patients with one HRCA (HR 2·55 [95% CI 1·22-5·36]; p=0·013) and two or more HRCA (HR 6·53 [95% CI 3·24-13·18]; p<0·0001). Patients with two or more HRCA also had a significantly higher risk of death than those with one HRCA (HR 2·56 [95% CI 1·53-4·28]; p=0·0004). The rates of 1-year sustained minimal residual disease negativity were similar in patients with zero HRCA (53 [35%] of 153] and with one HRCA (57 [41%] of 138) and were lower in patients with two or more HRCA (25 [24%] of 105). The median duration of follow-up from second randomisation was 37 months (IQR 33-42). 3-year progression-free survival from the second randomisation was 80% (95% CI 74-88) in patients with zero HRCA, 68% (95% CI 59-78) in patients with one HRCA, and 53% (95% CI 42-67) in patients with two or more HRCA. The risk of progression or death was higher in patients with one HRCA (HR 1·68 [95% CI 1·01-2·80]; p=0·048) and two or more HRCA (2·74 [95% CI 1·60-4·69], p=0·0003) than in patients with zero HRCA.

INTERPRETATION

This preplanned analysis of the FORTE trial showed that carfilzomib-based induction-intensification-consolidation regimens are effective strategies in patients with standard risk (zero HRCA) and high-risk (one HRCA) myeloma, resulting in similar rates of progression-free survival and 1-year sustained minimal residual disease negativity. Despite promising progression-free survival, patients with ultra-high-risk disease (those with 2 or more HRCA) still have an increased risk of progression and death and therefore represent an unmet medical need.

FUNDING

Amgen and Celgene/Bristol Myers Squibb.

The first relapse in multiple myeloma: how to pick the next best thing

The choice of treatment for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) at first relapse/progression is based on many factors: (1) treatment-related factors, which include the regimen used during first induction, the quality and duration of first response achieved, toxicities from the first treatment, whether the patient underwent autologous stem cell transplant, and whether the patient was on maintenance at the time of relapse/progression; (2) disease-related factors, including disease presentation and pace of progression; and (3) patient-related factors, including functional age and performance status. The learning objectives are to present the treatment options for patients with MM upon their first relapse and to learn about various strategies for selecting an optimal treatment regimen.

Newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: making sense of the menu

The development of new drugs and subsequent novel combinations for the treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) has resulted in a plethora of treatment options that can make the choice of initial induction therapy a challenge. A greater understanding of both patient- and disease-specific factors can provide a personalized approach to help design a treatment course. Historically, the choice of an induction regimen has been tethered to an initial impression of transplant eligibility at the time of diagnosis. As more effective and better-tolerated induction regimens have emerged, there has been increasing overlap in the induction strategies used for all patients with NDMM, which increasingly provide the ultimate goal of deep and durable remissions. The current treatment options and strategies for the management of NDMM are evaluated using the best available data to provide a rationale for these decisions.

Efficacy of maintenance treatment in patients with multiple myeloma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Despite conspicuous advances in innovating novel drugs and combination regimens in multiple myeloma (MM) in recent decades, the most appropriate maintenance regimens after inductive therapy are still controversial and opaque.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to identify the most effective maintenance treatment for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients via network meta-analysis.

METHOD

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Google Scholars from inception to April, 2022. Odds ratios (ORs) were generated for dichotomous variants. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Eventually a total of 19 trials, including 11 treatments and 8337 patients, were included in this analysis. For OS, lenalidomide (OR ranged from 1.61 to 1.99) and daratumumab (OR ranged from 1.83 to 2.41) showed significant efficacy over placebo. Maintenance therapy comprising lenalidomide-carfilzomib (OR ranged from 3.19 to 6.95), lenalidomide-prednisone (OR ranged from 2.62 to 4.44), bortezomib-thalidomide (OR ranged from 2.48 to 3.64), daratumumab (OR ranged from 2.0 to 2.98), lenalidomide (OR ranged from 1.4 to 3.19), ixazomib (OR ranged from 1.36 to 2.05), thalidomide (OR ranged from 1.5 to 1.86) demonstrated significant effects in prolonging PFS compared with placebo; Among the efficient therapies, lenalidomide-carfilzomib was significantly superior to lenalidomide (OR ranged from 2.18 to 2.20), daratumumab (OR ranged from 1.49 to 2.66) and ixazomib (OR ranged from 2.75 to 3.57).

CONCLUSION

Considering OS and PFS, lenalidomide-carfilzomib should be recommended as the best therapy. In clinical practice, this must be weighed against the increased risk of adverse events and financial burden. However, more head-to-head studies are needed to confirm these findings.

An update on the safety of ixazomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma

INTRODUCTION

Treatment options for multiple myeloma (MM) have rapidly expanded over the past few years with several newly approved drugs. While there is need to explore treatments that lead to longer responses and survival, special consideration should be given on reducing treatment burden, reducing toxicities, and improving quality of life. Ixazomib is the first oral proteasome inhibitor for the treatment of MM, combining clinical efficacy with a favorable safety profile.

AREAS COVERED

Here, we discuss the clinical efficacy and safety of ixazomib. Pharmacokinetic considerations, management of common toxicities, and the impact of the drug on the current and future treatment strategies are also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Ixazomib is an effective and welltolerated MM drug. It is also being studied in combination with other newer agents. It does not have long-term cumulative toxicities, and the most adverse events are mild and manageable. These findings, along with the ease of oral administration, make it a possible option for long-term treatment approaches for MM patients, as well as in the frail/elderly patient population.

Roadmap for new practitioners to navigate the multiple myeloma landscape

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a blood cancer in which monoclonal plasma cells cause end organ damage resulting in hypercalcemia, renal failure, anemia, and bone lesions. MM is considered incurable, however, recent advances in treatment have improved survival. Historically, MM has been treated with immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs), proteosome inhibitors (PIs), and corticosteroids. While newer therapeutic approaches such as monoclonal antibodies and cellular therapies have broadened the treatment horizon, the selection and sequencing of these therapies has become more complex. This review aims to help advanced practice providers navigate through the diagnosis, staging, treatment, and supportive care considerations in the MM space.

Multiple myeloma: 2022 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management

DISEASE OVERVIEW

Multiple myeloma accounts for approximately 10% of hematologic malignancies.

DIAGNOSIS

The diagnosis requires ≥10% clonal bone marrow plasma cells or a biopsy-proven plasmacytoma plus evidence of one or more multiple myeloma defining events (MDE): CRAB (hypercalcemia, renal failure, anemia, or lytic bone lesions) attributable to the plasma cell disorder, bone marrow clonal plasmacytosis ≥60%, serum involved/uninvolved free light chain (FLC) ratio ≥ 100 (provided involved FLC is ≥100 mg/L), or >1 focal lesion on magnetic resonance imaging.

RISK STRATIFICATION

The presence of del(17p), t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14;20), gain 1q, or p53 mutation is considered high-risk multiple myeloma. The presence of any two high risk factors is considered double-hit myeloma, and three or more high risk factors is triple-hit myeloma.

RISK-ADAPTED INITIAL THERAPY

In patients who are candidates for autologous stem cell transplantation, induction therapy consists of bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (VRd) given for approximately 3-4 cycles followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). In high-risk patients, daratumumab, bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (Dara-VRd) is an alternative to VRd. Selected standard-risk patients can collect stem cells, get additional cycles of induction therapy, and delay transplant until first relapse. Patients who are not candidates for transplant are treated with VRd for approximately 8-12 cycles followed by maintenance or alternatively with daratumumab, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (DRd) until progression.

MAINTENANCE THERAPY

Standard-risk patients need lenalidomide maintenance, while bortezomib plus lenalidomide maintenance is needed for high-risk myeloma.

MANAGEMENT OF RELAPSED DISEASE

A triplet regimen is usually needed at relapse, with the choice of regimen varying with each successive relapse.