HIV in the USA: priorities for the new administration

Ending the HIV Epidemic in Black America: Qualitative Insights Following COVID-19

BACKGROUND

The disproportionate effects of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and the Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) on Black American communities highlight structural systems rooted in racism and must be addressed with national strategies that improve both biomedicine and social determinants of health.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to qualitatively examine the experiences and interpretations of experts in the HIV workforce (local, state, and national HIV-related organizations) regarding the state of HIV and COVID-19 among Black Americans.

METHODS

Within key informant interviews and a focus group recorded and transcribed verbatim, fifteen members of the HIV workforce and Black community described their experiences and provided insights to inform ending the negative outcomes resulting from HIV and COVID-19.

RESULTS

Data were analyzed using NVivo software, and eight themes emerged to address disease disproportionality through a Black lens. Themes reflected (1) accessing information and care; (2) key potential partners/stakeholders; (3) investing in Black communities; (4) governmental support; (5) increasing engagement and advocacy; (6) HIV-related community conversations; (7) developments since COVID-19; and (8) the Ending the HIV Epidemic (EHE) trajectory.

CONCLUSIONS

Themes directly speak to recommendations to adjust education and policy strategies for HIV and COVID-19 prevention and intervention. Such recommendations, (1) amplifying Black voices, (2) investing sustainable dollars into Black communities, and (3) leaning into advocacy, can bolster the foundation for the HIV workforce and Black community to break ineffective response patterns and lead the fight against these systemic issues of inequity.

Temporal Trend and Clinical Outcomes in HIV and Non-HIV Patients following Liposuction: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Because of the availability of highly active antiretroviral therapy, individuals infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are enjoying greater longevity with chronic conditions including abnormal adipose distribution. However, prior data on postoperative outcomes of liposuction in HIV-positive patients were limited by small sample size. Therefore, the authors aimed to compare differences in temporary trend, clinical characteristics, and outcomes between patients with and without HIV who underwent liposuction.

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample database from 2010 to 2017 was queried to identify patients who underwent liposuction. Univariate, multivariate logistic regression and 1:4 propensity score-matched analyses were used to assess the primary outcomes (i.e., in-hospital mortality and postoperative outcomes) and secondary outcomes (i.e., discharge disposition, prolonged length of stay, and total cost).

RESULTS

Overall, 19,936 patients who underwent liposuction were identified, among whom 61 patients (0.31%) were infected with HIV. Patients with HIV were more likely to be male, insured by Medicare, and had more comorbidities and lower income. Unadjusted length of stay was longer among patients with HIV (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.09 to 2.99; P = 0.020); nevertheless, multivariable models and propensity score-matched analysis demonstrated that patients with HIV were no more likely to have complications than the general population. This was also the case for length of stay and total costs.

CONCLUSIONS

The authors' findings indicated that patients with HIV who underwent liposuction did not experience an increased risk of major complication or mortality. Liposuction could be safely considered as a surgical treatment for HIV-positive patients with local fat deposition.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, II.

Disrupting the Systems: Opportunities to Enhance Methodological Approaches to Address Socio-Structural Determinants of HIV and End the Epidemic Through Effective Community Engagement

A world without HIV is only possible by addressing the socio-structural determinants of health. Our understanding of socio-structural determinants is constantly changing, and parallel changes must occur with the methodologies used to explain the drivers of the HIV epidemic. We argue for the need to engage communities in the planning, implementation, and dissemination of research on the socio-structural determinants of HIV. Community engagement should cross-cut various types of research including rigorous measurement development of socio-structural determinants and novel analytic techniques to model their role in the trajectory of the epidemic and the impact of interventions. Considering the role of place, we recommend collaboration between scientists and communities in the interpretation of results from studies that map HIV-related behaviors and movement. As we collectively delve into historically oppressive systems with colonial antecedents, we must be ready to challenge these systems and replace them with collaborative models. The success of research-driven HIV policy and programming will best be evaluated with methodologies derived from the insights of the very individuals that these policies and programs aim to serve.

Toward Greater Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Equity: Increasing Provision and Uptake for Black and Hispanic/Latino Individuals in the U.S

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly effective at preventing HIV acquisition and is a critical tool in the Ending the HIV Epidemic in the U.S. initiative. However, major racial and ethnic disparities across the pre-exposure prophylaxis continuum, secondary to structural inequities and systemic racism, threaten progress. Many barriers, operating at the individual, network, healthcare, and structural levels, impede PrEP access and uptake within Black and Hispanic/Latino communities. This review provides an overview of those barriers and the innovative and collaborative solutions that health departments, healthcare organizations, and community partners have implemented to increase PrEP provision and uptake among disproportionately affected communities. Promising strategies at the individual and network levels focus on increasing patient support throughout the PrEP continuum, positioning and training community members to expand knowledge of and interest in PrEP, and leveraging mobile technologies to support PrEP uptake. Healthcare-level solutions include expanding the venues and types of healthcare professionals that can provide PrEP, and structural- and policy-level options focus on financial assistance programs and health insurance expansion. Key research gaps include demonstrating that pilot studies and interventions remain effective at scale and across varied contexts. Although the last 2 decades have provided effective tools to end the HIV epidemic, realizing this vision for the U.S. will require addressing persistent and pervasive HIV-related disparities in Black and Hispanic/Latino communities. Federal, state, and local partners should expand efforts to address longstanding health and structural inequities and partner with disproportionately affected communities to rapidly expand PrEP scale-up.