Effectiveness of low-dose heparin in prevention of myocardial reinfarction

Clinical Studies with Anticoagulants that Have Changed Clinical Practice

Anticoagulant therapy is the cornerstone of treatment and prevention of arterial and venous thromboembolism. Taking a historical perspective, starting in the 1960s, and progressing through to 2022, we discuss key clinical trials of anticoagulants that have changed clinical practice, and examine obstacles encountered in bringing these anticoagulants to the clinic. The design of some of the early studies that shaped clinical practice was poor by current standards, but their results were influential because nothing better was available. Both heparin and vitamin K antagonists had been in clinical use for several decades before well-designed trials in the 1980s optimized their dosing and enhanced their safety and efficacy. Low-molecular-weight heparin then replaced unfractionated heparin because it had a more predictable dose-response and a longer half-life, thereby allowing it to be used conveniently in out-of-hospital settings. More recently, direct oral anticoagulants became the oral anticoagulants of choice for most indications because they were shown to be at least as safe and effective as vitamin K antagonists when used in fixed doses without the need for laboratory monitoring. The design of the trials that led to the approval of the direct oral anticoagulants was excellent, but further studies are required to optimize their dosing in selected patients who were underrepresented in these trials.

Small molecules as inhibitors of PCSK9: Current status and future challenges

Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) plays an important role in regulating lipoprotein metabolism by binding to low-density lipoprotein receptors (LDLRs), leading to their degradation. LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering drugs that operate through the inhibition of PCSK9 are being pursued for the management of hypercholesterolemia and reducing its associated atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Two PCSK9-blocking monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), alirocumab and evolocumab, were approved in 2015. However, the high costs of PCSK9 antibody drugs impede their prior authorization practices and reduce their long-term adherence. Given the potential of small-molecule drugs, the development of small-molecule PCSK9 inhibitors has attracted considerable attention. This article provides an overview of the recent development of small-molecule PCSK9 inhibitors disclosed in the literature and patent applications, and different approaches that have been pursued to modulate the functional activity of PCSK9 using small molecules are described. Challenges and potential strategies in developing small-molecule PCSK9 inhibitors are also discussed.

Heparan sulfate proteoglycans present PCSK9 to the LDL receptor

Coronary artery disease is the main cause of death worldwide and accelerated by increased plasma levels of cholesterol-rich low-density lipoprotein particles (LDL). Circulating PCSK9 contributes to coronary artery disease by inducing lysosomal degradation of the LDL receptor (LDLR) in the liver and thereby reducing LDL clearance. Here, we show that liver heparan sulfate proteoglycans are PCSK9 receptors and essential for PCSK9-induced LDLR degradation. The heparan sulfate-binding site is located in the PCSK9 prodomain and formed by surface-exposed basic residues interacting with trisulfated heparan sulfate disaccharide repeats. Accordingly, heparan sulfate mimetics and monoclonal antibodies directed against the heparan sulfate-binding site are potent PCSK9 inhibitors. We propose that heparan sulfate proteoglycans lining the hepatocyte surface capture PCSK9 and facilitates subsequent PCSK9:LDLR complex formation. Our findings provide new insights into LDL biology and show that targeting PCSK9 using heparan sulfate mimetics is a potential therapeutic strategy in coronary artery disease.PCSK9 interacts with LDL receptor, causing its degradation, and consequently reduces the clearance of LDL. Here, Gustafsen et al. show that PCSK9 interacts with heparan sulfate proteoglycans and this binding favors LDLR degradation. Pharmacological inhibition of this binding can be exploited as therapeutic intervention to lower LDL levels.

Orally Ingested Heparin Is Absorbed in, Humans

It has been accepted for many years that orally ingested heparin is not absorbed. Recent evidence has shown that heparin placed in the stomach of rats is very rapidly absorbed and that it also quickly and almost completely attaches to the vascular endothelium and prevents jugular vein thrombosis. Within 6 min, heparin was undetectable in the blood plasma. If a similar situation exists in humans, blood samples taken >15 min after heparin ingestion will lack evidence of anticoagulant activity. In this study, 45 individuals swallowed 20,000 units of heparin. Plasma activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) levels were determined (in duplicate) before and at frequent intervals for 30 min after the heparin ingestion. There as a slightly prolonged APTT (range, 1-5 s) after swallowing the heparin. The average increase in the APTT was 2.3 s, which is statistically significant (p < 0.001), as the standard deviation of the method is .43 s. In several instances, frozen plasma aliquots, analyzed for heparin by a chromogenic method, showed its presence after ingestion. The preliminary results are important, although obviously oral heparin does not attain effective anticoagulant levels, as the many non-anticoagulant actions of heparin and the observation of its absorption after oral ingestion present numerous possibilities for new clinical applications. Key Words: Heparin—Oral absorption.

Monitoring and Reversal of Anticoagulation and Antiplatelets

Since percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty was first described and the breakthrough studies of the role of stents were reported, the evolution in anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy used during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has reduced periprocedural ischemic events and stent thrombosis. Although greater combinations and doses of anticoagulation with antiplatelets seem to provide the best protection against thrombogenic and embolic events, there is a significant trade-off with a higher risk of major and minor bleeding episodes. This review article expands on each of the commonly used antiplatelet and anticoagulants used at time of PCI, focusing on drug monitoring and reversal.

The primary and secondary prevention of coronary artery disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition)

The following chapter devoted to antithrombotic therapy for chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) is part of the Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that the benefits do or do not outweigh risks, burden, and costs. Grade 2 suggests that individual patient values may lead to different choices (for a full understanding of the grading see the "Grades of Recommendation" chapter by Guyatt et al in this supplement, CHEST 2008; 133[suppl]:123S-131S). Among the key recommendations in this chapter are the following: for patients with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE)-acute coronary syndrome (ACS) we recommend daily oral aspirin (75-100 mg) [Grade 1A]. For patients with an aspirin allergy, we recommend clopidogrel, 75 mg/d (Grade 1A). For patients who have received clopidogrel and are scheduled for coronary bypass surgery, we suggest discontinuing clopidogrel for 5 days prior to the scheduled surgery (Grade 2A). For patients after myocardial infarction, after ACS, and those with stable CAD and patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), we recommend daily aspirin (75-100 mg) as indefinite therapy (Grade 1A). We recommend clopidogrel in combination with aspirin for patients experiencing ST-segment elevation (STE) and NSTE-ACS (Grade 1A). For patients with contraindications to aspirin, we recommend clopidogrel as monotherapy (Grade 1A). For long-term treatment after PCI in patients who receive antithrombotic agents such as clopidogrel or warfarin, we recommend aspirin (75 to 100 mg/d) [Grade 1B]. For patients who undergo bare metal stent placement, we recommend the combination of aspirin and clopidogrel for at least 4 weeks (Grade 1A). We recommend that patients receiving drug-eluting stents (DES) receive aspirin (325 mg/d for 3 months followed by 75-100 mg/d) and clopidogrel 75 mg/d for a minimum of 12 months (Grade 2B). For primary prevention in patients with moderate risk for a coronary event, we recommend aspirin, 75-100 mg/d, over either no antithrombotic therapy or vitamin K antagonist (Grade 1A).

Long-term anticoagulant therapy in patients with coronary artery disease

Secondary prevention of coronary events in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients with aspirin is generally accepted because of ease of administration, predictable safety, and proven efficacy. The use of long-term anticoagulant therapy with heparins, vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs), or thrombin inhibitors is, however, more controversial. During the last 40 years, several trials have been conducted in order to evaluate the role of anticoagulant therapy in patients with CAD as a protection against subsequent death and thrombo-embolic complications. The conducted trials are heterogeneous in many ways, concerning comparative medications, patient populations, endpoints and follow-up, which makes a standardized recommendation on the basis of these studies difficult. This review is an overview of the largest and best studies on this topic and discusses the scientific background for a possible use of VKA or an alternative anticoagulant treatment in CAD patients, looking at both the beneficial effects and the risk of bleeding.

Antithrombotic therapy for coronary artery disease: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy

This chapter about antithrombotic therapy for coronary artery disease (CAD) is part of the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence Based Guidelines. Grade 1 recommendations are strong and indicate that the benefits do, or do not, outweigh risks, burden, and costs. Grade 2 suggests that individual patients' values may lead to different choices (for a full understanding of the grading see Guyatt et al, CHEST 2004; 126:179S-187S). Among the key recommendations in this chapter are the following: For patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndrome (ACS), we recommend immediate and then daily oral aspirin (Grade 1A). For patients with an aspirin allergy, we recommend immediate treatment with clopidogrel, 300-mg bolus po, followed by 75 mg/d indefinitely (Grade 1A). In all NSTE ACS patients in whom diagnostic catheterization will be delayed or when coronary bypass surgery will not occur until > 5 days, we recommend clopidogrel as bolus therapy (300 mg), followed by 75 mg/d for 9 to 12 months in addition to aspirin (Grade 1A). In NSTE ACS patients in whom angiography will take place within 24 h, we suggest beginning clopidogrel after the coronary anatomy has been determined (Grade 2A). For patients who have received clopidogrel and are scheduled for coronary bypass surgery, we recommend discontinuing clopidogrel for 5 days prior to the scheduled surgery (Grade 2A). In moderate- to high-risk patients presenting with NSTE ACS, we recommend either eptifibatide or tirofiban for initial (early) treatment in addition to treatment with aspirin and heparin (Grade 1A). For the acute treatment of NSTE ACS, we recommend low molecular weight heparins over unfractionated heparin (UFH) [Grade 1B] and UFH over no heparin therapy use with antiplatelet therapies (Grade 1A). We recommend against the direct thrombin inhibitors as routine initial antithrombin therapy (Grade 1B). For patients after myocardial infarction, after ACS, and with stable CAD, we recommend aspirin in doses from 75 to 325 mg as initial therapy and in doses of 75 to 162 mg as indefinite therapy (Grade 1A). For patients with contraindications to aspirin, we recommend long-term clopidogrel (Grade 1A). For primary prevention in patients with at least moderate risk for a coronary event, we recommend aspirin, 75 to 162 mg/d, over either no antithrombotic therapy or vitamin K antagonist (VKA) [Grade 2A]; for patients at particularly high risk of events in whom the international normalized ratio (INR) can be monitored without difficulty, we suggest low-dose VKA (target INR, 1.5) [Grade 2A].

Hemorrhagic Complications of Anticoagulant Treatment

This chapter about hemorrhagic complications of anticoagulant treatment is part of the seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy: Evidence Based Guidelines. Bleeding is the major complication of anticoagulant therapy. The criteria for defining the severity of bleeding varies considerably between studies, accounting in part for the variation in the rates of bleeding reported. The major determinants of vitamin K antagonist-induced bleeding are the intensity of the anticoagulant effect, underlying patient characteristics, and the length of therapy. There is good evidence that vitamin K antagonist therapy, targeted international normalized ratio (INR) of 2.5 (range, 2.0 to 3.0), is associated with a lower risk of bleeding than therapy targeted at an INR > 3.0. The risk of bleeding associated with IV unfractionated heparin (UFH) in patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) is < 3% in recent trials. This bleeding risk may increase with increasing heparin dosages and age (> 70 years). Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is associated with less major bleeding compared with UFH in acute VTE. UFH and LMWH are not associated with an increase in major bleeding in ischemic coronary syndromes, but are associated with an increase in major bleeding in ischemic stroke. Information on bleeding associated with the newer generation of antithrombotic agents has begun to emerge. In terms of treatment decision making for anticoagulant therapy, bleeding risk cannot be considered alone, ie, the potential decrease in thromboembolism must be balanced against the potential increased bleeding risk.

Combined effects of melagatran and eptifibatide on platelet aggregation inhibition but not thrombin generation inhibition

The aim of our study was to investigate the combined in vitro effects of melagatran and eptifibatide on platelet aggregation and thrombin generation under low and high coagulant challenge in tissue-factor-activated, platelet-rich plasma. Increasing amounts of melagatran dose-dependently decreased prothrombin fragment 1.2 and activated factor X values, and dose-dependently prolonged the lag phase until the onset of platelet aggregation. Eptifibatide exerted a dose-dependent anti-aggregating effect under both high and low coagulant challenge. The combination of melagatran and eptifibatide resulted in significant additive prolongation of the lag phase until the onset of platelet aggregation, which was more pronounced under low coagulant challenge. Under low, but not under high, coagulant challenge, the combination of melagatran and eptifibatide had a significant additive inhibitory effect on platelet aggregation. No additive effects on decreasing prothrombin fragment 1.2 and activated factor X values were observed with combined administration of the drugs. The present study demonstrates the additive effect of melagatran and eptifibatide on platelet aggregation inhibition and on prolongation of the lag phase until the onset of platelet aggregation.

Hemorrhagic complications of anticoagulant treatment

Bleeding is the major complication of anticoagulant therapy. The criteria for defining the severity of bleeding varied considerably between studies, accounting in part for the variation in the rates of bleeding reported. Since the last review, there have been several meta-analyses published on the rates of major bleeding in trials of anticoagulants for atrial fibrillation and ischemic heart disease. The major determinants of oral anticoagulant-induced bleeding are the intensity of the anticoagulant effect, underlying patient characteristics, and the length of therapy. There is good evidence that low-intensity oral anticoagulant therapy (targeted INR of 2.5; range, 2.0 to 3.0) is associated with a lower risk of bleeding than therapy targeted at a higher intensity. Lower-intensity regimens (INR < 2.0) are associated with an even smaller increase in major bleeding. In terms of treatment decision making for anticoagulant therapy, bleeding risk cannot be considered alone, ie, the potential decrease in thromboembolism must be balanced against the potential increased bleeding risk. The risk of bleeding associated with IV heparin in patients with acute venous thromboembolism is < 3% in recent trials. There is some evidence to suggest that this bleeding risk increases with the heparin dosage and age (> 70 years). LMW heparin is not associated with increased major bleeding compared with standard heparin in acute venous thromboembolism. Standard heparin and LMW heparin are not associated with an increase in major bleeding in ischemic coronary syndromes, but are associated with an increase in major bleeding in ischemic stroke.

Randomized trial comparing intravenous nitroglycerin and heparin for treatment of unstable angina secondary to restenosis after coronary artery angioplasty

BACKGROUND

The treatment of unstable angina targets the specific pathophysiological thrombotic process at the site of the active culprit lesion. In unstable angina due to a restenotic lesion, smooth muscle cell proliferation and increased vasoreactivity may play a more important role than thrombus formation. Therefore, the relative benefits of nitroglycerin and heparin might differ in unstable angina associated with restenosis compared with classic unstable angina.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We randomized 200 patients hospitalized for unstable angina within 6 months after angioplasty (excluding those with intracoronary stents) to double-blind administration of intravenous nitroglycerin, heparin, their combination, or placebo for 63+/-30 hours. Recurrent angina occurred in 75% of patients in the placebo and heparin-alone groups, compared with 42.6% of patients in the nitroglycerin-alone group and 41.7% of patients in the nitroglycerin-plus-heparin group (P<0.003). Refractory angina requiring angiography occurred in 22.9%, 29.2%, 4. 3%, and 4.2% of patients, respectively (P<0.002). The odds ratios for being event free were 0.24 (95% CI, -0.13 to 0.45, P=0.0001) for nitroglycerin versus no nitroglycerin and 0.98 (95% CI, -0.55 to 1. 73, P=NS) for heparin versus no heparin. No patient died or suffered myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous nitroglycerin is highly effective in preventing adverse ischemic events (recurrent or refractory angina) in patients with unstable angina secondary to restenosis, whereas heparin has no effect.

Current concepts in secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction

Acute myocardial infarction (MI) is the leading cause of death around the globe. Advances in the field of cardiology have identified several effective treatments that have lead to decrease in mortality from this cause over the past 3 decades. The purpose of this article is to review the existing literature in regards to secondary prevention after acute MI. A search of MEDLINE through August of 1999 was carried out to identify any available publications on secondary prevention after MI. Evidence on the use of both pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions that was shown to be effective in improving morbidity and mortality was sought. Recommendations for the treatment of patients with acute MI are made based on existing evidence. Betablockers, aspirin and lipid-lowering agents for patients with low density lipoprotein-cholesterol > 130 mg% should be used for all patients following a MI. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors are indicated for patients with congestive heart failure and/or reduced left ventricular ejection fraction and are likely protective in most patients. Calcium channel blockers (Verapamil and Diltiazem) are indicated as second-line therapy for patients who have contraindications or are intolerant to betablockers. The routine prophylactic use of antiarrhythmic drugs to suppress ventricular ectopic beats should be avoided. Recommendations regarding diet, smoking cessation and achievement of ideal body weight should be an integral part of patient management. Referral for outpatient rehabilitation should also be strongly encouraged. Finally, adequate control of blood pressure and diabetes cannot be overemphasized. Adherence to these goals in patients with acute MI will lead to better long-term outcomes and reduction in cardiac death, recurrent MI, stroke, and need for coronary revascularization.

Randomized trial of the effects of low-dose calcium-heparin in patients with peripheral arterial disease and claudication. Italian CAP Study Group

PURPOSE

We performed a long-term, multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of low-dose, subcutaneous calcium-heparin (12,500 IU/day) in comparison with placebo in patients with stable peripheral arterial disease of the lower extremities.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

At the end of a 2-week washout period, during which aspirin placebo was given, 201 patients were randomly assigned to receive either subcutaneous calcium-heparin or placebo for two 3-month treatment periods, each of which was followed by a 6-month period of observation. All of the patients were given low-dose aspirin (50 mg/day) throughout the 18-month study. The main efficacy variables were pain-free and maximum walking time (by standard treadmill test). Patients answered a questionnaire about pain and the limitation of daily activities. Results were analyzed by intention-to-treat.

RESULTS

At the end of the study, the estimated increase in pain-free walking time was 39% in the heparin group and 23% in the placebo group (P = 0.09). The estimated increase in maximum walking time was 40% in the heparin group and 16% in the placebo group (P = 0.05). Patients treated with heparin also reported that they had to stop walking because of leg pain, or had daily activities limited by leg pain, less frequently than the placebo group (P <0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with low-dose subcutaneous calcium-heparin is safe and effective in improving walking performance and reducing physical disability in patients with stable peripheral arterial disease and claudication.

Low-molecular-weight heparins for acute coronary syndromes: an emergency medicine perspective

Patients with chest pain represent one of the largest and most challenging populations for emergency departments to treat. Diagnostic and treatment modalities implemented in the emergency department are associated with significant clinical outcomes and financial implications. Critical pathways are being developed to increase the speed and efficiency with which these patients are managed. Of particular importance is the evolving role of low-molecular-weight heparins, which have both clinical and economic advantages over unfractionated heparins in treating unstable angina and non-Q wave myocardial infarction.

Effect of low-dose heparin on fibrinogen levels in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease

Several prospective studies have demonstrated that high plasma fibrinogen levels are associated with an increased risk of ischemic heart disease. Since in most patients an increased thrombin generation has been reported, we investigated whether the control of thrombin generation could affect plasma fibrinogen levels. Forty male outpatients (20 asymptomatic with previous myocardial infarction and 20 with stable effort angina) were enrolled in a randomized medium-term (6 months) cross-over study. Clottable fibrinogen, according to Clauss, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2, thrombin-antithrombin complex, and fibrinopeptide A were evaluated in relation to treatment with low-dose heparin. After a 15-day wash-out period, during which patients had been treated only with nitrates if needed, patients were allocated to two sequential periods of treatment with standard heparin (12,500 U, subcutaneously daily) plus antianginal treatment or antianginal treatment alone, separated by a second 15-day wash-out period. At the end of the treatment period with low-dose heparin significant decreases in the plasma fibrinogen (2.5 +/- 0.6 g/l vs. 3.3 +/- 0.5 g/l, P < 0.001), prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (1.4 +/- 0.5 nmol/l vs. 1.9 +/- 0.7 nmol/l, P < 0.001), thrombinantithrombin (4.5 +/- 2.4 ng/ml vs. 9.7 +/- 3.6 ng/ml, P < 0.001), and fibrinopeptide A (2.1 +/- 1.1 ng/ml vs. 3.5 +/- 2.1 ng/ml, P < 0.001) were observed compared with the period without heparin. The present results indicate that low-dose heparin can effectively control the increased abnormal thrombin generation and elevated fibrinogen levels in patients with ischemic heart disease, possibly decreasing the risk of cardiovascular death.

Effects of heparin treatment on hemostatic abnormalities in obese non-insulin-dependent diabetic patients

This study was conducted to identify the mechanisms responsible for coagulative and fibrinolytic alterations and to study the effects of a short-term treatment with low-dose heparin on hemostatic abnormalities in obese non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) patients. Four groups of age- and sex-matched patients were studied: (1) lean nondiabetic subjects (n = 30) with a body mass index (BMI) less than 25 kg/m2 (lean control subjects), (2) obese nondiabetic subjects (n = 30) with a BMI greater than 30 kg/m2 (obese control subjects), (3) lean NIDDM patients (n = 30), and (4) obese NIDDM patients (n = 30). All subjects were tested on the following parameters: fibrinogen, factor VII, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2), thrombin-antithrombin III complexes (TAT), tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) antigen (Ag) before and after venous occlusion (VO), and plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 (PAI-1) activity pre- and post-VO. In addition, all these parameters were evaluated in obese NIDDM patients after 10 days of treatment with a single dose of 12,500-U/d subcutaneous calcium heparin and after a 10-day washout period. At baseline, obese nondiabetic subjects, lean NIDDM patients, and especially obese NIDDM patients displayed significantly (P < .01) higher levels of fibrinogen, factor VII, F1 + 2, TAT, t-PA(Ag) pre-VO, and PAI-1 pre- and post-VO and significantly (P < .01) lower levels of t-PA(Ag) post-VO. In obese NIDDM patients treated with heparin fibrinogen, factor VII, F1 + 2, TAT, t-PA(Ag) pre-VO, and PAI-1 pre- and post-VO levels significantly (P < .01) decreased and t-PA(Ag) post-VO levels significantly (P < .01) increased at the end of treatment. Our findings demonstrate in obese nondiabetic subjects, lean NIDDM patients, and especially obese NIDDM patients the hemostatic abnormalities contributing to an enhanced risk of thrombotic complications. We conclude that in obese NIDDM patients, short-term treatment with heparin may reduce this thrombophilic state and have a potential benefit in the progression of diabetic microvascular and macrovascular disease and needs further investigation.

Comparison of low-molecular-weight heparin with unfractionated heparin acutely and with placebo for 6 weeks in the management of unstable coronary artery disease. Fragmin in unstable coronary artery disease study (FRIC)

BACKGROUND

Low-molecular-weight heparin has a number of pharmacological and pharmacokinetic advantages over unfractionated heparin that make it potentially suitable, when used in combination with aspirin, for the treatment of unstable coronary artery disease.

METHOD AND RESULTS

Patients with unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction (1482) were included in the study, which had two phases. In an open, acute phase (days 1 to 6), patients were assigned either twice-daily weight-adjusted subcutaneous injections of dalteparin (120 i.u./kg) or dose-adjusted intravenous infusion of unfractionated heparin. In the double-blind, prolonged treatment phase (days 6 to 45), patients received subcutaneously either dalteparin (7500 i.u. once daily) or placebo. During the first 6 days, the rate of death, myocardial infarction, or recurrence of angina was 7.6% in the unfractionated heparin-treated patients and 9.3% in the dalteparin-treated patients (relative risk, 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 1.66). The corresponding rates in the two treatment groups for the composite end point of death or myocardial infarction were 3.6% and 3.9%, respectively (relative risk, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.80). Revascularization procedures were undertaken in 5.3% and 4.8% of patients in unfractionated heparin and dalteparin groups, respectively (relative risk, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.57 to 1.35). Between days 6 and 45, the rate of death, myocardial infarction, or recurrence of angina was 12.3% in both the placebo and dalteparin groups (relative risk, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.38). The corresponding rates for death or myocardial infarction were 4.7% and 4.3% (relative risk, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.54 to 1.57). Revascularization procedures were undertaken in 14.2% and 14.3% of patients in the placebo and dalteparin groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results add to previous evidence suggesting that the low-molecular-weight heparin dalteparin administered by twice-daily subcutaneous injection may be an alternative to unfractionated heparin in the acute treatment of unstable angina or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Prolonged treatment with dalteparin at a lower once-daily dose in our study did not confer any additional benefit over aspirin (75 to 165 mg) alone.

Effects of low-dose heparin infusion on arterial endothelin-1 release in humans

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of low-dose heparin infusion on arterialized endothelin-1 (ET-1) release in the presence of fasting or high insulin levels in healthy humans.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eleven normal subjects underwent two tests in random order lasting 240 minutes. A primed (250 IU), continuous heparin (600 IU/h) infusion was performed in test 1; saline was infused in test 2 as control. At 120 minutes, a euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp (25 mU.kg-1.h-1) was started that lasted 2 hours in both tests. Two hours after heparin infusion (test 1), ET-1 levels decreased by 32% (3.52 +/- 0.60 to 3.02 +/- 0.73 pg/mL), while nitric oxide (NO) and forearm blood flow increased by 29% and 14%, respectively. During saline infusion, ET-1, nitric oxide, and forearm blood flow remained unchanged. There was a significant interaction between the effect of decreasing ET-1 levels and the heparin treatment (F, 4.06; df, 3.30; P < .01). The decrease in ET-1 levels was significantly correlated with the increase in forearm blood flow in test 1 (r = .74; P < .01) but not in test 2. During the heparin/insulin period, ET-1 increased by 25%, returning to fasting values; nitric oxide levels increased by 12%; and forearm blood flow remained unchanged.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showed that it is possible to decrease ET-1 levels by use of low-dose heparin infusion in humans. This effect seems mediated by a simultaneous increase in nitric oxide levels and is completely reversed by a mild increase in insulin concentrations.

Randomised comparison of subcutaneous heparin, intravenous heparin, and aspirin in unstable angina. Studio Epoorine Sottocutanea nell'Angina Instobile (SESAIR) Refrattorie Group

Intravenous heparin has been used in the control of myocardial ischaemia in patients with unstable angina. We set out to assess the efficacy of subcutaneous heparin in reducing myocardial ischaemia in patients with unstable angina. 343 of 399 patients with unstable angina were monitored for 24 h and 108 were refractory to conventional antianginal treatment and were entered into a randomised multicentre trial. 37 patients were assigned to heparin infusion (partial thromboplastin time 1.5-2 times baseline), 35 to subcutaneous heparin (adjusted dose with partial thromboplastin time 1.5-2 times baseline), and 36 to aspirin (325 mg daily). All had additional conventional antianginal therapy. After the run-in patients were monitored for 3 days. The primary endpoint was reduced myocardial ischaemia assessed by the number of anginal attacks, silent ischaemic episodes, and duration of ischaemia per day. At 1 week and 1 month we accounted for anginal attacks and other clinical events (myocardial infarction, revascularisation procedures, and death). Aspirin did not significantly affect the incidence of myocardial ischaemia. On the first 3 days, infused and subcutaneous heparin significantly decreased the frequency of angina (on average by 91% and 86%, respectively), episodes of silent ischaemia (by 56% and 46%), and the overall duration of ischaemia (66% and 61%) versus run-in day and aspirin (p < 0.001 for all variables). The favourable effects of heparin therapy remained evident during follow-up. Only minor bleeding complications occurred. Subcutaneous heparin is effective in the control of myocardial ischaemia in patients with unstable angina.

IPO-V2: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, comparative clinical investigation of the effects of sulodexide in preventing cardiovascular accidents in the first year after acute myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to assess the efficacy of sulodexide, a glycosaminoglycan compound with antithrombotic properties, in preventing death and thromboembolic events after acute myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND

Antithrombotic therapy has been found to play an important role in the prevention of cardiovascular events and death after acute myocardial infarction. Glycosaminoglycan-containing compounds, including sulodexide, show profibrinolytic and antithrombotic properties that render them suitable for use in patients after infarction.

METHODS

A total of 3,986 patients who had recovered from acute myocardial infarction were randomized to receive either the standard therapy routinely administered at each study center, excluding antiplatelet and anticoagulant drugs (control group, 1,970 patients), or the standard therapy plus sulodexide (treated group, 2,016 patients). Between 7 and 10 days after the episode of acute myocardial infarction, sulodexide was administered as a single daily 600-lipoprotein-lipase-releasing unit (LRU) intramuscular injection for the 1st month, followed by oral capsules of 500 LRU twice daily. Patients were evaluated for > or = 12 months.

RESULTS

At the end of the study, 140 deaths (7.1%) were recorded in the control group and 97 (4.8%) in the sulodexide group (32% risk reduction, p = 0.0022, chi-square test). A total of 90 patients (4.6%) in the control group had a further infarction, compared with 66 (3.3%) in the sulodexide group (28% risk reduction, p = 0.035). Furthermore, a reduction in left ventricular thrombus formation (evaluated by echocardiography) was observed in the sulodexide group (n = 12; 0.6%), compared with values in the control group (n = 25; 1.3%) (53% risk reduction, p = 0.027). Sulodexide was well tolerated and devoid of significant adverse events. All significant results were confirmed by "actual treatment" analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

The study provides evidence that long-term therapy with sulodexide started early after an episode of acute myocardial infarction is associated with reductions in total mortality, rate of reinfarction and mural thrombus formation.

Indium 111-labeled platelets accumulation over abdominal aortic graft with chronic disseminated intravascular coagulation--a case history

The authors describe a seventy-six-year-old man with aortic graft, which became the focus of chronic disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). The patient had abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and the size had increased up to 38 mm in diameter. The AAA was excised and replaced by Dacron graft. Ten months later, the DIC became chronic with renal dysfunction. Indium 111-labeled platelets scintigraphy showed increased accumulation of radioactivity over the graft. In the treatment of chronic DIC, low-dose subcutaneous heparin injection (5,000-10,000/day) was effective, and he was discharged. In this case there was also suspicion of lung cancer and recurrent aortic aneurysm, which were a more reasonable cause of chronic DIC. This case suggests that an aortic graft prosthesis may be a cause of localized chronic DIC and that indium 111-labeled platelets scintigraphy is useful for the detection of localized chronic DIC. Moreover, subcutaneous heparin administration may be effective for chronic DIC in patients with an abdominal aortic graft prosthesis.

Pharmacodynamics, clinical indications, and adverse effects of heparin

Heparins are a heterogenous group of naturally occurring glycosaminoglycans characterized by anticoagulant activity and a wide range of molecular weights (low molecular weight or fractionated heparins evolving within the past two decades). Cofactors for endogenous inhibitors of coagulation (antithrombin III and heparin cofactor II), heparin administration results in a hypocoagulable state. Various platelet activities, including inhibition of activity induced by platelet-derived growth factors on vascular smooth muscle, also have been noted. Divorced of anticoagulant nature, novel applications may include a role in atherosclerosis prevention, acceleration of collateral coronary as well as peripheral circulation (i.e., angiogenesis), and continued (chronic) post-myocardial infarction therapy. Established indications include treatment of various thrombotic diseases, unstable angina, and thrombosis chemoprophylaxis in medical/surgical patients. The antithrombotic potential of the heparins is used also in thrombosis management related to extracorporeal circulatory assistance or dialysis devices. Heparin's therapeutic potential in the postphlebitic syndrome as well as in acute treatment of myocardial infarction (primarily and adjunctively with various thrombolytic agents) continues to undergo evaluation; however, early data review shows favorable trends for its inclusion in situations that favor thrombus generation (e.g., anterior myocardial infarction). Although associated with thrombocytopenia or hypertransaminasemia, the heparins are relatively well tolerated. In a small subset of patients, a severe thrombocytopenia may ensue, which generally resolves on medication withdrawal. As this class of glycosaminoglycans becomes better characterized, new indications may emerge for both native and the newer fractionated heparins.

Plasma fibrinopeptide A levels in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with alteplase. Correlation with concomitant heparin, coronary artery patency, and recurrent ischemia. The European Cooperative Study Group

BACKGROUND

Fibrin generation during and after therapy with alteplase may depend on the level of concomitant anticoagulation. The hypothesis that fibrinopeptide A (FPA) levels, as markers of ongoing in vivo fibrin formation, correlate with the angiographic and clinical outcome of thrombolysis is tested.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Serial plasma FPA levels were determined in 334 patients of the randomized European Cooperative Study Group trial comparing heparin versus placebo plus alteplase and aspirin in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Median FPA levels (with the 10th to 90th percentiles) were 21 ng/ml (2-390 ng/ml) before treatment in placebo-allocated patients (n = 166) and increased to 49 (15-580), 34 (4-320), 27 (2-240), 29 (2-430), and 30 (3-390) ng/ml after 0.75, 3, 12, 24, and 36 hours, respectively. In heparin-allocated patients (n = 168), median baseline FPA values were 18 ng/ml (2-210 ng/ml) and decreased to 6 (1-110), 5 (1-75), 5 (1-60), 7 (1-100), and 10 (1-170) ng/ml at corresponding time points (p less than 0.0001 for the difference at each time point). Adequate anticoagulation, defined as no activated partial thromboplastin time value below twice the pretreatment value at 3, 12, 24, and 36 hours after initiation of treatment, was obtained in 48 patients assigned to heparin. It was associated with normal median FPA levels (less than or equal to 4 ng/ml) at all time points compared with 12 (2-80), 16 (2-240), and 15 (2-240) ng/ml at 12, 24, and 36 hours, respectively, in heparin-assigned but inadequately anticoagulated patients (n = 102, p less than 0.001 for each time point). In the heparin-treated group, median FPA values tended to be lower at all time points in patients with patent vessels than in patients with occluded arteries, but the difference was significant only at 24 hours (p = 0.04). FPA levels did not correlate with clinically apparent recurrent ischemia or with left ventricular thrombosis on two-dimensional echocardiography.

CONCLUSIONS

During and after thrombolytic therapy with alteplase, the enhanced fibrin generation is suppressed by sustained concomitant anticoagulation with intravenous heparin. Adequate anticoagulation warrants individual titration of the heparin dose. High plasma FPA levels 24 hours after alteplase therapy are specific but insensitive markers of vessel occlusion in anticoagulated patients. They do not correlate with clinical outcome.