The anatomy of large inpatient waiting lists

The shadows of waiting and care: on discourses of waiting in the history of the British National Health Service

Waiting is at the centre of experiences and practices of healthcare. However, we know very little about the relationship between the subjective experiences of patients who wait in and for care, health practitioners who 'prescribe' and manage waiting, and how this relates to broader cultural meanings of waiting. Waiting features heavily in the sociological, managerial, historical and health economics literatures that investigate UK healthcare, but the focus has been on service provision and quality, with waiting (including waiting lists and waiting times) drawn on as a key marker to test the efficiency and affordability of the NHS. In this article, we consider the historical contours of this framing of waiting, and ask what has been lost or occluded through its development. To do so, we review the available discourses in the existing literature on the NHS through a series of 'snapshots' or key moments in its history. Through its negative imprint, we argue that what shadows these discourses is the idea of waiting and care as phenomenological temporal experiences, and time as a practice of care. In response, we begin to trace the intellectual and historical resources available for alternative histories of waiting - materials that might enable scholars to reconstruct some of the complex temporalities of care marginalized in existing accounts of waiting, and which could help reframe both future historical accounts and contemporary debates about waiting in the NHS.

Space, place and (waiting) time: reflections on health policy and politics

Health systems have repeatedly addressed concerns about efficiency and equity by employing trans-national comparisons to draw out the strengths and weaknesses of specific policy initiatives. This paper demonstrates the potential for explicit historical analysis of waiting times for hospital treatment to add value to spatial comparative methodologies. Waiting times and the size of the lists of waiting patients have become key operational indicators. In the United Kingdom, as National Health Service (NHS) financial pressures intensified from the 1970s, waiting times have become a topic for regular public and political debate. Various explanations for waiting times include the following: hospital consultants manipulate NHS waiting lists to maintain their private practice; there is under-investment in the NHS; and available (and adequate) resources are being used inefficiently. Other countries have also experienced ongoing tensions between the public and private delivery of universal health care in which national and trans-national comparisons of waiting times have been regularly used. The paper discusses the development of key UK policies, and provides a limited Canadian comparative perspective, to explore wider issues, including whether 'waiting crises' were consciously used by policymakers, especially those brought into government to implement new economic and managerial strategies, to diminish the autonomy and authority of the medical professional in the hospital environment.

Waiting lists in the post-review NHS

Waiting lists for hospital inpatient treatment have existed since the foundation of the NHS. There have been many theories put forward to explain them and a wide range of proposals have been advanced to reduce or eliminate them. The effect of the recent changes in the NHS, coupled with the renewed political focus on waiting lists, is explored. It is concluded that access to waiting lists may be restricted, either by explicit rationing or as a result of contractual specifications. Further, the introduction of GP Fundholding, together with the purchaser-provider split, could result in a two-tier service, at least for non-urgent patients. These conclusions are illustrated by the findings from a simple simulation model.

Prevalence of total hip replacement: how much demand has been met?

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of completed elective total hip replacements in a defined elderly population.

DESIGN

Cross sectional postal questionnaire survey with additional data and validation from general practice and hospital records.

SETTING

Six general practices in the English counties of Avon, Somerset, and Oxfordshire.

SUBJECTS

A total of 7806 patients aged 65 years and over (94.7% response).

RESULTS

The overall prevalence (95% confidence intervals) of elective total hip replacement was 5.3 (4.8,5.8)% Age and sex specific prevalences were 2.7 (2.0,3.5)% in men and 4.1 (3.3,4.9)% in women aged 65-74 years, and 5.2 (4.0,6.5)% in men and 8.8 (7.6,10.0)% in women aged 75 years and over. Of the 415 patients who had received elective total hip replacement, 28.2% had required bilateral surgery, 20% had received at least one operation privately, and 13% had required revision surgery.

CONCLUSION

Our results show an increased level of satisfied demand for total hip replacement in elderly people compared with earlier estimates. The increasing prevalence of hip replacement is an indicator of increasing potential demand for revision procedures. Population based surveys are required to establish the level of unmet demand for primary procedures. Differences in past surgical activity may be important in interpreting the wide variation in current surgical rates.

Incapacity for work in elective orthopaedic surgery: a study of occurrence and the probability of returning to work after treatment

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The extent to which patients undergoing elective surgery for orthopaedic disorders were incapacitated for work while they were on the waiting list and whether they were able to return to work after surgery were studied.

DESIGN

This was a prospective cohort study of patients admitted to hospital for elective orthopaedic surgery. Main outcome measures were occurrence of sickness certification during the waiting time, and whether those incapacitated for work at the time of surgery returned to work during the first year after treatment. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate adjusted odds ratios for factors influencing return to work.

SETTING

Orthopaedic department in charge of all elective orthopaedic surgery in a population of 197,354 persons in central Norway.

SUBJECTS

All 2803 patients admitted to hospital for chronic orthopaedic disorders in the defined population between 1 September 1988 and 31 August 1990 were included in the study.

MAIN RESULTS

Of the 1333 patients who were employed, 42% had been certified sick due to the orthopaedic disorder for some period of the waiting time. Sickness benefits from the national insurance scheme (paid from the 15th day of sickness certification) had been received by 33% and were received by 29% at the time of surgery. Of 380 patients incapacitated for work at the time of surgery, 53% returned to work within the first year after surgery. Using those treated within one month of being placed on the waiting list as the reference group, the adjusted odds ratios for not returning to work during the first year after surgery were 9.2 (p < 0.0001) for those who waited more than a year for surgery, 6.2 (p = 0.002) for those waiting nine to 12 months, and 4.9 (p = 0.02) for those waiting for six to nine months.

CONCLUSIONS

A high proportion of these patients were incapacitated for work, 53% of those incapacitated returned to work within the first year after surgery. The probability of returning to work after surgery is strongly influenced by the length of time on the waiting list. Waiting for more than one year, compared with immediate treatment, was associated with an adjusted odds ratio of 9.2 for not returning to work.

The National Cataract Surgery Survey: I. Method and descriptive features

The National Cataract Surgery Survey is a prospective cross-sectional survey of surgery for age-related cataract within the National Health Service. It is the first national study of cataract surgery in the United Kingdom providing clinical data. This is the first in a series of papers and describes a profile of the characteristics of patients admitted for cataract surgery that includes: demography, referral sources, presence of co-existing ocular pathology, level of visual impairment on admission and waiting time for surgery. A profile of the process of the surgical procedure for 1990 is also described: number of operations performed, type of admission, type of anaesthetic, cataract extraction and intraocular lens and the grade of surgeon performing the procedure.

Unnecessary arthroscopies

A review of the results of arthroscopies on patients taken from an 'open access' service waiting list has been carried out. One-third of all arthroscopies proved to be negative. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis was not related to the clinical grade of the examining doctor. The excess annual cost to the Northern Ireland Orthopaedic Service of unnecessary arthroscopies may have been of the order of 89,000 pounds.

An audit of the usage of operating theatre time in a peripheral teaching surgical unit

A recent report by the National Audit Office found that only 50% to 60% of weekday operating time was being used. This report was examined by the Committee of Public Accounts and much of the blame for underutilization of operating theatres was attributed to poor working practices among surgeons. We investigated theatre utilization in our hospital and found underutilization on the same scale as the National Audit Office. Twenty-five per cent of theatre sessions were not allocated for use, 23% of general surgical lists were cancelled and, of the lists which did take place, a further 23% of theatre time was not utilized. The single largest cause of underutilization was understaffing. To increase theatre utilization higher levels of staffing and expenditure are needed rather than changes in the working practices of surgeons.

Variations in surgical practice: welcome diversity of disturbing differences

The review examines the variations in surgical practice and assesses the value of surgical audit in quality control and allocation of surgical resources.