Lower homologous blood requirement in autologous blood donors after treatment with recombinant human erythropoietin

THE USE OF AUTOLOGOUS BLOOD TRANSFUSION IN DIGESTIVE TRACT SURGERY: A LITERATURE REVIEW

BACKGROUND

The use of autologous blood transfusion in digestive tract surgeries, whether after preoperative blood collection or intraoperative blood salvage, is an alternative to allogeneic blood, which brings with it certain risks and shortage, due to the lack of donors. Studies have shown lower mortality and longer survival associated with autologous blood, however the theoretical possibility of spreading metastatic disease is still one of the limiting factors of its use.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the application of autologous transfusion in digestive tract surgeries, noting the benefits, damages and effects on the spread of metastatic disease.

METHODS

This is an integrative review of the literature available in the PubMed, Virtual Health Library and SciELO databases, by searching for "Autologous Blood Transfusion AND Gastrointestinal Surgical Procedures". Observational and experimental studies and guidelines published in the last five years in Portuguese, English or Spanish were included.

RESULTS

Not all patients benefit from blood collection before elective procedures, with the time of surgery and hemoglobin levels some of the factors that may indicate the need for preoperative storage. Regarding the intraoperative salvaged blood, it was observed that there is no increased risk of tumor recurrence, but the importance of using leukocyte filters and blood irradiation is highlighted. There was no consensus among the studies whether there is a maintenance or reduction of complication rates compared to allogeneic blood. The cost related to the use of autologous blood may be higher, and the less stringent selection criteria prevent it from being added to the general donation pool.

CONCLUSION

There were no objective and concordant answers among the studies, but the strong evidence of less recurrence of digestive tumors, the possibility of changes in morbidity and mortality, and the reduction of costs with patients suggest that the practice of autologous blood transfusion should be encouraged in digestive tract surgeries. It is necessary to note if the deleterious effects would stand out amidst the possible benefits to the patient and to health care systems.

Postoperative hemoglobin and recovery of hip muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty

Background

The presence/absence of postoperative anemia are presumed to have an impact on early recovery after surgery. This study was performed to compare hip muscle strength and hemoglobin during the perioperative period in 82 patients undergoing THA.

Methods

Evaluation of presence/absence of anemia was performed by calculating the 10-day postoperative/preoperative Hb ratio. Muscle strength was investigated before and 2 months after surgery.

Results

Postoperative SLR strength showed a significant difference between the patients whose 10-day postoperative/preoperative Hb ratio was <85% and ≧ 85%.

Conclusion

We need to consider perioperative strategies to minimize anemia in order to improve patient outcomes.

Blood Management Strategies in Total Knee Arthroplasty

A perioperative blood management program is one of a number of important elements for successful patient care in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and surgeons should be proactive in its application. The aims of blood conservation are to reduce the risk of blood transfusion whilst at the same time maximizing hemoglobin (Hb) in the postoperative period, leading to a positive effect on outcome and cost. An individualized strategy based on patient specific risk factors, anticipated blood loss and comorbidities are useful in achieving this aim. Multiple blood conservation strategies are available in the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative periods and can be employed in various combinations. Recent literature has highlighted the importance of preoperative Hb optimization, minimizing blood loss and evidence-based transfusion guidelines. Given TKA is an elective procedure, a zero allogenic blood transfusion rate should be the aim and an achievable goal.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Comparison of Two Recombinant Human Erythropoietin Formulations, PDA10 and Eprex, in Healthy Korean Male Volunteers: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Single-Dose, Two-Period Crossover Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A new biosimilar human recombinant epoetin alfa product (PDA10) has been developed by PanGen Biotech Inc., Korea. This study was planned to demonstrate the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparability of PDA10 to an existing epoetin alfa (Eprex) after a single intravenous administration to healthy adult male volunteers.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blinded, single-dose, crossover study was conducted in 30 subjects. The subjects were assigned randomly to one of two sequence groups, and single doses of 100 IU/kg PDA10 or Eprex were administered intravenously on each of 2 treatment days separated by a 4-week washout period. Plasma erythropoietin concentrations were measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and the pharmacokinetic parameters of the two treatments were compared. The time course and area under the effect curve (AUEC) of absolute reticulocyte counts were used as surrogate parameters for the pharmacodynamic evaluation. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 30 subjects were enrolled, and 27 completed the study. The geometric mean ratios (PDA10/Eprex) of erythropoietin for maximum plasma concentration (C max) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve to the last measurable concentration (AUC0-last) after intravenous administration of 100 IU/kg were 1.00 (90% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-1.05) and 0.96 (90% CI 0.93-1.00). The absolute reticulocyte counts of PDA10 and Eprex were similar, as determined from the maximum reticulocyte count and AUEC0-last values. Treatment-emergent AEs were mild and occurred in seven subjects.

CONCLUSION

PDA10 and Eprex met the regulatory criteria for bioequivalence with respect to their pharmacokinetic profiles and pharmacodynamic actions.

Detection, evaluation, and management of preoperative anaemia in the elective orthopaedic surgical patient: NATA guidelines

Previously undiagnosed anaemia is common in elective orthopaedic surgical patients and is associated with increased likelihood of blood transfusion and increased perioperative morbidity and mortality. A standardized approach for the detection, evaluation, and management of anaemia in this setting has been identified as an unmet medical need. A multidisciplinary panel of physicians was convened by the Network for Advancement of Transfusion Alternatives (NATA) with the aim of developing practice guidelines for the detection, evaluation, and management of preoperative anaemia in elective orthopaedic surgery. A systematic literature review and critical evaluation of the evidence was performed, and recommendations were formulated according to the method proposed by the Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group. We recommend that elective orthopaedic surgical patients have a haemoglobin (Hb) level determination 28 days before the scheduled surgical procedure if possible (Grade 1C). We suggest that the patient's target Hb before elective surgery be within the normal range, according to the World Health Organization criteria (Grade 2C). We recommend further laboratory testing to evaluate anaemia for nutritional deficiencies, chronic renal insufficiency, and/or chronic inflammatory disease (Grade 1C). We recommend that nutritional deficiencies be treated (Grade 1C). We suggest that erythropoiesis-stimulating agents be used for anaemic patients in whom nutritional deficiencies have been ruled out, corrected, or both (Grade 2A). Anaemia should be viewed as a serious and treatable medical condition, rather than simply an abnormal laboratory value. Implementation of anaemia management in the elective orthopaedic surgery setting will improve patient outcomes.

Increased iron absorption during autologous blood donation supported by recombinant human erythropoietin therapy

BACKGROUND

Recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) therapy improves the success of autologous blood (AB) donation programs before elective surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate iron absorption during an AB donation program with or without rHuEPO.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Thirty-two patients were randomly assigned among placebo (Group 1) or 300 (Group 2) or 600 UI per kg rHuEPO (Group 3) on the first, second, and third donation visits. All patients also received daily oral iron (200 mg Fe(+)).

RESULTS

The number of units collected in Group 3 was higher than in Group 1 (4.6 +/- 0.5 vs. 3.6 +/- 0.8 units; p < 0.01). Red blood cell (RBC) production increased in a rHuEPO dose-dependent manner. With rHuEPO, the RBC volume collected per unit presented a lower decrease with number of donated units than with placebo and was similar to that of homologous blood units. Storage iron did not influence the number of units collected, whereas circulating mobilizable iron was the limiting factor. Oral iron absorption increased in a rHuEPO dose-dependent manner (12-fold with 600 UI/kg rHuEPO) and was proportional to erythropoietic activity.

CONCLUSION

rHuEPO does not only improve the number of AB units collected but also their quality. Storage iron cannot meet marrow iron requirements, but rHuEPO strongly increased oral iron absorption in a dose-dependent fashion through stimulation of erythropoietic activity.

Modern concepts of autologous haemotherapy

The increasing current perception that the safety of allogeneic blood transfusion has dramatically been improved during the last decade is challenging autologous haemotherapy methods. In addition, growing concern about the unfavourable cost-effectiveness of most autologous haemotherapy methods requires a refinement of the application of these measures to well defined circumstances. In contrast, newly emerging transfusion-transmissible infections or periods of blood shortage might revive interest in these blood sparing techniques. Preoperative autologous blood donation still plays a significant role in settings with high individual benefit for the patient, high transfusion probabilities and when all opportunities of cost minimization can be applied. Preoperative plasmapheresis is considered to be a sensible adjunct if intraoperative retransfusion of salvaged and washed red cells is planned. Acute normovolaemic haemodilution is valuable when the patient's tolerability of the haemodilution and the expected blood loss are carefully examined beforehand. Intra- or postoperative salvage of wound blood can also be regarded as useful measures to prevent allogeneic transfusions as long as the specific advantages and disadvantages of the different methods are taken into account. Finally, alternative and supplemental measures such as iron or erythropoietin administration should always be considered in order to optimize the efficacy and effectiveness of autologous haemotherapy methods. The goal of a "bloodless medicine" might not be reached but is supposed to be approached closely with an integrated concept exploiting all measures available. However, in times of restricted health care resources, regular sound cost-effectiveness analyses, taking the availability and the current safety profile of allogeneic blood products into account, are always warranted and needed.

Orthopedic Surgery Transfusion Hemoglobin European Overview (OSTHEO) study: blood management in elective knee and hip arthroplasty in Europe

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess current practices in blood management in elective orthopedic surgery in Europe.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

For this 225-center prospective survey, data were collected on 3996 patients. Actual perioperative blood loss was compared to preoperative estimates. Differences in Hb levels and other outcome variables for patients receiving allogeneic versus autologous transfusions were evaluated. The probability of allogeneic transfusion based on selected predictor variables was estimated.

RESULTS

A total of 2640 (67%) hip and 1305 (33%) knee arthroplasty patients were evaluated. Estimated blood loss (median, 750 mL) was significantly lower than computed blood loss (median, 1944 mL). A total of 2762 (69%) patients received transfusions, including 1393 (35%) autologous-only and 1024 (25%) allogeneic-only. The probability of allogeneic transfusion decreased with increasing baseline Hb, but differentially so for men and women. Transfusion triggers were Hb levels of 8.93 +/- 1.83 g per dL for allogeneic transfusions, and 21 percent of these occurred when the Hb level was greater than 10 g per dL. Autologous blood transfusion was associated with a significantly lower rate (1%) of wound infections than allogeneic blood transfusion (4.2%).

CONCLUSION

Accurate assessment of preoperative Hb levels, better estimation of perioperative blood loss, efficient use of autologous blood, adherence to transfusion guidelines, and pharmacologic alternatives contribute to effective and comprehensive blood and anemia management.

Planning for hemorrhage. Steps an anesthesiologist can take to limit and treat hemorrhage in the obstetric patient

Obstetric hemorrhage continues to be a significant cause of maternal mortality and morbidity. Blood transfusion in such circumstances may be life saving but involves exposing the patient to additional risks. Limiting blood transfusion and using autologous blood when possible may reduce some of these risks. This article outlines the techniques that may be used to limit and more effectively treat hemorrhage in the obstetric patient, with particular attention paid to reducing the use of allogeneic blood transfusion.

Intravenous versus oral iron supplementation for preoperative stimulation of hemoglobin synthesis using recombinant human erythropoietin

To compare two modalities of iron supplementation for the preoperative stimulation of erythropoiesis using recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO), 12 adults in normal hemoglobin and iron status due for elective surgery were randomized to rhEPO 200 U/kg body weight subcutaneously twice weekly combined with either iron sucrose 200 mg intravenously twice weekly or iron sulfate 160 mg/day orally, for 3 weeks preoperatively. Efficacy was measured by the increases over baseline in hemoglobin, reticulocyte count, and ferritin determined 3 days before surgery; preoperative reticulocyte count and ferritin were significantly higher with intravenous iron, whereas the only significant intragroup increases in hemoglobin between time points also occurred in this group. Intravenous iron significantly boosts the hematopoietic response to rhEPO and prevents iatrogenic iron depletion in otherwise healthy candidates for elective surgery.

Erythropoietin and preoperative autologous blood donation in the prevention of hepatitis C infection: necessity or luxury?

BACKGROUND

Prevention of exposure to allogeneic blood transfusion during surgery is an important financial issue when recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) is used in addition to preoperative blood donation.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

The aim of this study was to carry out a cost-effectiveness analysis of the use of rHuEPO in preoperative blood donation in orthopedic surgery. The study, based on a decision tree analysis of the use of rHuEPO, was conducted from the perspective of the French health care system. The efficacy criterion was the number of hepatitis C infections prevented. The decision tree analysis was constructed as follows: the residual risk of hepatitis C infection was 8.26 per million units transfused, and the chance node was defined according to the number of units transfused.

RESULTS

With the use of rHuEPO in preoperative blood donation, 0.30562 cases of hepatitis C infection per 100,000 patients were prevented. The incremental cost of one prevented hepatitis C infection amounted to $888,000,000 (US).

CONCLUSION

Despite the limitations of our model, the cost-effectiveness ratio was so large that variations only slightly modified the size of the result. From the societal perspective, it was not cost-effective to add rHuEPO to preoperative blood donation.

Perioperative management of selected problems in patients with rheumatic diseases

Patients undergoing surgery are subject to multiple perioperative problems. This article reviews several issues that occur in surgical patients with rheumatic diseases, including management of medications, diagnosis of fat embolism syndrome, prophylaxis against endocarditis, postoperative fever, and perioperative myocardial infarction.

Erythropoietin to minimize perioperative blood transfusion: a systematic review of randomized trials. The International Study of Peri-operative Transfusion (ISPOT) Investigators

Our aim was to perform a systematic review to determine the efficacy and side-effects of erythropoietin, given with or without autologous predonation, to patients undergoing orthopaedic or cardiac surgery. A number of studies have been done to determine whether erythropoietin minimizes exposure to perioperative allogeneic red cell transfusion. A systematic review of all randomized trials will provide the best estimate of the efficacy and side-effects of erythropoietin therapy. All randomized trials of erythropoietin in cardiac or orthopaedic surgery that reported the proportion of patients receiving perioperative allogeneic transfusion were included. The efficacy of erythropoietin was evaluated in subgroups of patients depending upon the route of administration, dose of erythropoietin, the type of control and the methodological quality of the study report. The odds ratio for the proportion of patients transfused with allogeneic blood in studies of erythropoietin to augment autologous donation was 0.42 (95% confidence limits 0.28-0.62; P < 0.0001) for orthopaedic surgery and 0.25 (95% CI 0.08-0.82; P = 0.02) for cardiac surgery. The odds ratio for erythropoietin alone was 0.36 (95% CI 0.24-0.56; P = 0.0001) in orthopaedic surgery and 0.25 (95% CI 0.06-1.04; P < 0.06) in cardiac surgery. The route of administration, dose of erythropoietin, type of control and methodological quality of the study report had no statistically significant effect upon the odds ratios. Although there was no convincing evidence that erythropoietin used alone increased the frequency of thrombotic complications, some studies found an excess of events in erythropoietin-treated patients, and the number of patients studied was relatively small. Erythropoietin, when given alone or to augment autologous donation, decreased exposure to perioperative allogeneic transfusion in orthopaedic and cardiac surgery. Further studies are required to definitively establish the safety of erythropoietin alone, to determine the optimal dose of perioperative erythropoietin, and to compare its efficacy and cost-effectiveness with other methods of minimizing perioperative transfusion.

Erythropoietin therapy in the perioperative setting

Recombinant human erythropoietin has been approved for use in patients undergoing autologous donation in Japan, Europe, and Canada since 1993, 1994, and 1996, respectively, and for perisurgical adjuvant therapy without autologous donation in Canada and the United States since 1996. Early clinical trials of erythropoietin therapy in the setting of autologous donation have provided important information regarding clinical safety, erythropoietin dose, and erythropoietic response. Later trials of perisurgical erythropoietin therapy without autologous donation provided data on efficacy (reduced allogeneic blood exposure) that led to approval of erythropoietin in patients undergoing surgery. However, the erythropoietin doses (300 U/kg subcutaneous x14 days) used in these trials, and their subsequent inclusion in labeling for the use of this product, are costly and tedious to administer. A recent study reported that a weekly regimen of erythropoietin (600 U/kg) for 4 weeks is less costly but just as effective at reducing allogeneic blood exposure in elective orthopaedic surgery. The most cost effective regimen that has been shown to minimize allogeneic exposure is preoperative erythropoietin therapy (600 U/kg subcutaneous weekly x2 and 300 U/kg subcutaneous on day of surgery) coupled with acute normovolemic hemodilution in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy. A similar regimen of erythropoietin therapy in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (2500 U/kg subcutaneous in divided doses for 2 weeks preoperatively) coupled with hemodilution also was effective. Low dose erythropoietin therapy coupled with acute normovolemic hemodilution ultimately may be shown to be cost equivalent to the predonation of three autologous blood units before elective surgery.

Effect of blood transfusion on survival after esophagogastrectomy for carcinoma

BACKGROUND

There is growing evidence that blood transfusion is associated with clinical factors that can lead to transfusion-induced immunosuppression. This effect can be beneficial or deleterious.

METHODS

The effect of perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion on survival was studied retrospectively in 524 patients who were discharged from the hospital after esophagogastrectomy for carcinoma performed in a single unit over a 10-year period.

RESULTS

The median operative blood loss for the series was 500 mL (range, 50 to 3,750 mL). Three hundred thirty-five patients (64%) received a perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion related to esophagogastrectomy, and 189 (36%) did not. The median perioperative blood transfusion administered was 900 mL (range, 300 to 12,950 mL). Perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion was associated with reduced survival for patients in stage III (p < 0.05) at 1 year, but no significant difference was found in this stage at 3 or 5 years after resection. Stage III disease accounted for 250 (48%) of the 524 patients discharged.

CONCLUSIONS

Although perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion does not affect long-term survival after esophagogastrectomy for carcinoma, it does have a significant association with short-term survival in a group whose overall survival is often limited after resection. Attention should be directed toward minimizing operative blood loss and transfusing only for factors known to be clinically important, such as oxygen delivery and hemodynamics, not arbitrary hemoglobin levels.

[Blood transfusion in surgery: can it still be reduced by human recombinant erythropoietin?]

New agents such as recombinant human erythropoietin (rHu EPO) modify conventional transfusionnal strategies. For accurate indications, such as, anaemia associated with chronic renal failure, cancer or cardiac disease, the preoperative prescription of rHu EPO may reduce transfusion requirements. rHu EPO may also be associated with pre-deposit transfusion in patients with anaemia before blood donation, when the transfusion needs are high, or the period for blood pre-deposit donation shortened. Postoperatively rHu EPO is only efficient if it is administered for a prolonged period; this condition limits its indications and value because of its high cost.

Haemopoietic growth factors

Haemopoietic growth factors are involved in the production of the various blood cells from progenitors in the bone marrow, making them useful in a range of clinical situations. The genes for several of them have been cloned and their production engineered by recombinant technology, making them widely available. Myeloid growth factors are used to support patients in the aftermath of chemotherapy and bone marrow transplantation and have potential application in the treatment of infectious diseases. Erythropoietin is widely used for patients with anaemia due to failure of marrow production, having established its effectiveness in chronic renal failure. Thrombopoietin has recently been described and may provide a means to alleviate thrombocytopenia. Current indications and areas of recent reappraisal are addressed in this review.

Perioperative use of recombinant human erythropoietin in patients refusing blood transfusions. Pathophysiological considerations based on 5 cases

The efficacy of the administration of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) in the treatment of anaemia in critically ill surgical patients refusing red cell transfusions requires further documentation. Herein, we report the outcome of 5 consecutive severely anaemic Jehovah's Witness patients (lowest haemoglobin concentration 27 g/1), who were discharged from the hospital in good condition after treatment. RHuEPO (50-280 U/kg body weight) was daily administered to 4 of the patients, who either exhibited preoperative anaemia or developed postoperative anaemia refractory to endogenous EPO probably due to inflammation. RHuEPO treatment was followed by a steep rise in reticulocytes and haemoglobin concentration. The fifth patient, who exhibited no signs of systemic inflammation following emergency hemicolectomy, was also treated with intravenous iron, but not with rHuEPO. His blood haemoglobin concentration rose from 27 g/l to 92 g/l in 3 wk. These observations indicate that the administration of rHuEPO is justified in the management of life-threatening anaemia, although only on a humanitarian basis, because there is no predictor for the possible spontaneous recovery.

Avoidance of Allogeneic Blood Transfusions by Treatment With Epoetin Beta (Recombinant Human Erythropoietin) in Patients Undergoing Open-Heart Surgery

In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we evaluated the ability of epoetin beta (recombinant human erythropoietin) to avoid allogeneic blood transfusions (ABT) and the associated risks in patients undergoing primary elective open-heart surgery and in whom autologous blood donation (ABD) was contraindicated. Seventy-six patients overall were enrolled onto the trial and were randomly assigned to the two treatment groups, 5 × 500 U/kg body weight (BW) epoetin beta or placebo intravenously over 14 days preoperatively. All patients received 300 mg Fe2+ orally per day during the treatment period. Preoperatively, the mean hemoglobin increase was 1.50 g/dL greater in epoetin beta patients than in placebo patients (95% confidence interval, 1.10 to 1.90 g/dL), allowing a rapid return to the baseline value by the seventh postoperative day in most epoetin beta patients. The mean volume of blood collected by intraoperative isovolemic hemodilution was 562 mL (red blood cell mass, 274 mL) in the epoetin beta group and 218 mL (red blood cell mass, 94 mL) in the placebo group, respectively. Only four patients (11%) in the epoetin beta group received an ABT, compared with 19 (53%) in the placebo group (P = .0003). Epoetin beta was most useful in patients with a perioperative blood loss greater than 750 mL, in those with a baseline hematocrit value less than 0.42, and in those aged ≥60 years. The iron supplementation proved adequate despite the fact that a significant decrease in ferritin (median, 48.1%) and transferrin saturation (median, 40.5%) was observed in epoetin beta patients preoperatively. No influence of epoetin beta therapy on blood pressure, laboratory safety variables, or the frequency of specific adverse events was observed. Intravenous epoetin beta treatment of 5 × 500 U/kg BW in combination with 300 mg Fe2+ orally per day administered over 14 days preoperatively is an adequate therapy for increasing mean hemoglobin levels by approximately 1.50 g/dL and reducing the allogeneic blood requirement in patients undergoing elective open-heart surgery and in whom ABD is contraindicated.

Improving the efficacy of preoperative autologous blood donation in patients with low hematocrit: a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of recombinant human erythropoietin

The effects of therapy with recombinant human erythropoietin (Epoetin alfa) on erythropoiesis, preoperative autologous blood donation, and risk of exposure to allogeneic blood were evaluated in 204 patients scheduled to undergo elective orthopedic surgery. Study protocol required patients to have a baseline hematocrit < or = 39% and surgery scheduled 25-35 days in advance. Patients were randomized to two equal groups and were seen at study centers every 3-4 days within the 21-day trial period. At each visit, phlebotomy(< or = 450 mL) was performed if the hematocrit was > or = 33%, and Epoetin alfa (600 U/kg) or placebo was administered intravenously. A total of 173 patients were assessable; 31% of placebo recipients and 20% of Epoetin alfa recipients required allogeneic transfusion (p = 0.09). Logistic regression modeling showed that the risk of allogeneic transfusion was reduced by Epoetin alfa (p = 0.025). When patients receiving > 6 units of blood (necessitating allogeneic units) were excluded from analysis, 29% of placebo recipients and 14% of Epoetin alfa recipients were exposed to allogeneic blood (p = 0.015). Epoetin alfa recipients predonated more autologous units than did placebo recipients (4.5 vs 3.0 units, respectively; p < 0.001), and their production of red blood cells increased significantly more over baseline production values (668 vs 353 mL, respectively; p < 0.05). These results demonstrate that administration of Epoetin alfa stimulates erythropoiesis, allows predonation of more units of autologous blood, and reduces the risk of exposure to allogeneic blood. Optimal dosing regimens and surgical patients most likely to benefit fro Epoetin alfa therapy must be established.

Blood conservation in acute care and critical care

Blood conservation has evolved into an important issue in hospital-based medicine. Increased awareness of and worry about transfusion-associated diseases have prompted a focus on this important area. New technologies, including continuous intraarterial monitoring devices, microchemical technologies, new drug development (recombinant human erythropoietin and aprotinin) and intraoperative salvage techniques have made the concept of clinically important blood conservation possible. In this article, the authors review clinically important areas regarding blood conservation, which are subsequently detailed in this issue of AACN Clinical Issues. Emphasis is placed on the need for blood conservation in acute and critical care practice and the technologies available to achieve this goal.

Perisurgical erythropoietin application in anemic patients with colorectal cancer: A double-blind randomized study

BACKGROUND

Blood transfusions are associated with higher postoperative morbidity and tumor recurrence rates in colorectal cancer surgery, To reduce the need for transfusions in patients with tumor-induced anemia who are not suitable for autologous blood donation, it was tested whether perisurgical erythropoietin application would be able to stimulate hematopoiesis adequately.

METHODS

In a double-blind randomized study 150 IU/kg body weight erythropoietin was given subcutaneously every 2 days beginning 10 days before operation and continuing until postoperative day 2. Twenty patients were randomized into the erythropoietin group with three observed dropouts and 10 patients into the placebo group.

RESULTS

In the erythropoietin group two episodes of hypertension and one deep venous thrombosis were observed. Preoperative hemoglobin response in the erythropoietin group (p = 0.069) was paralleled by a highly significant reticulocyte increase (p = 0.0004). However, frequency of blood transfusion was not different between both study groups (erythropoietin, 1.82 +/- 0.80 units/ patient; placebo, 1.80 +/- 0.97 units/patient). If iron availability was analyzed, a strong correlation between ferritin blood levels and transferrin iron saturation with hemoglobin response was observed in regression analysis (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate that hematopoiesis in anemic patients with colorectal cancer can be stimulated by erythropoietin; however, clinical efficacy is to be expected only in selected patients with high iron availability, which calls for further studies combining erythropoietin and parenteral iron application.

Optimising collection of autologous blood. A pilot study of the use of recombinant human erythropoietin and parenteral iron

OBJECTIVE

To optimise collection of sufficient autologous blood for elective surgery.

METHODS

Prospective study of 40 patients referred for donation of autologous blood, who were booked for elective orthopaedic surgery in the period August 1992 - September 1994. Patients received recombinant erythropoietin (r-EPO) to stimulate erythropoiesis, and sufficient iron by injection so that iron deficiency did not limit the bone marrow response to the r-EPO.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight of the 40 patients treated with this protocol stored an average of 3.7 units each on a twice-weekly donation schedule. Only one patient required supplemental homologous blood (two units) in subsequent surgery. One patient developed persistent hypotension, and one a late reaction to parenteral iron (which was controlled with corticosteroids). There were no other adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

r-EPO in combination with parenteral iron is a safe and effective method of ensuring the collection of optimal amounts of autologous blood before surgery.

Post-operative erythropoiesis is limited by the inflammatory effect of surgery on iron metabolism

The decrease in haemoglobin concentration commonly observed after major surgery is usually corrected by red cell transfusions or oral iron medication. The increased awareness of blood-transmissible diseases has led to the restrictive use of homologous blood and to interest in alternatives for correcting anaemia. We investigated the pathophysiology of postoperative anaemia by studying variables of erythropoiesis, iron metabolism, and inflammation in 48 consecutive patients who underwent total hip replacement. Haemoglobin concentration remained low during 14 days after surgery with only a mild increase in erythropoietin concentration and reticulocyte count. No increase in serum transferrin receptor concentration was observed during the first 2 weeks after surgery. Postoperative serum ferritin increased, whereas serum iron, transferrin and transferrin saturation decreased significantly. There was a marked increase in interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein with maximal values on the 1st and 4th post-operative day, respectively. At 6 weeks after surgery, haemoglobin concentration and variables of iron metabolism were almost at the preoperative level and serum transferrin receptor concentration was significantly increased, indicating increased erythropoietic activity. These changes were preceded by the normalization of interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein levels. Haemoglobin, iron, transferrin, and ferritin concentrations were not influenced by iron therapy during the postoperative period and no differences of erythropoietic and iron variables were observed between transfused and non-transfused patients. In conclusion, post-operative erythropoiesis is associated with an inflammatory effect of surgery on iron metabolism, which can explain, despite a slightly increased production of erythropoietin, the persistence of anaemia and the lack of effect of iron supplementation after surgery.

Detrimental effects of perioperative blood transfusion

Evidence suggests that perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion increases the risk of infectious complications after major surgery and of cancer recurrence after curative operation. This has been attributed to immunosuppression. Several authors have suggested that filtered whole blood and/or red cell concentrate, or leucocyte- and buffy coat-reduced red cells in artificial medium or their own plasma, may reduce postoperative immunosuppression. It was also anticipated that the use of autologous blood might minimize the risk of perioperative transfusion, but studies have unexpectedly shown similar postoperative infectious complications and cancer recurrence and/or survival rates in patients receiving autologous blood donated before operation and those receiving allogeneic blood. Future studies should identify common risk factors associated with blood storage.