Recognition of uridine diphosphate glucuronosyl transferases by LKM-3 antibodies in chronic hepatitis D

Evaluation of immunoserological detection of anti-liver kidney microsomal, anti-soluble liver antigen and anti-mitochondrial antibodies

Autoantibodies are the diagnostic hallmark of autoimmune liver diseases. Indirect immunofluorescence (IFT) is the reference method for the detection of anti-mitochondrial antibodies (AMA) and anti-liver kidney microsomal type-1 (anti-LKM1) antibodies, and inhibition ELISA (iELISA) for anti-soluble liver antigen (anti-SLA) antibodies. Given the complexity of these techniques, commercial ELISAs have emerged as a practical alternative, but without head-to-head validations. This study evaluated the agreement between three commercial ELISAs and the reference techniques and the impact of polyreactive immunoglobulin G (pIgG), a recently described phenomenon in autoimmune hepatitis, on commercial ELISAs. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using Cohen-Kappa coefficient (κ). Forty-eight, 46, and 66 samples were analyzed for AMA, anti-LKM1, and anti-SLA, respectively. For AMA, one commercial assay showed high agreement (κ = 0.91 (0.78-1.00)) with the reference method, while the other two showed weak or moderate agreement. For anti-LKM1, only one commercial assay showed high agreement (κ = 0.86 (0.71-1.0)). For anti-SLA antibodies only moderate agreement was achieved (κ up to 0.71 (0.52-0.89)). There was a trend towards higher pIgG levels in false-positives in the commercial ELISAs. Patients with high suspicion of autoimmune liver diseases should be referred to reference laboratories with the capacity of performing gold standard methods if the initial ELISA-based screening was performed.

Non-organ-specific autoantibodies with unspecific patterns are a frequent para-infectious feature of chronic hepatitis D

Infections with hepatotropic viruses are associated with various immune phenomena. Hepatitis D virus (HDV) causes the most severe form of viral hepatitis. However, few recent data are available on non-disease-specific and non-organ-specific antibody (NOSA) titers and immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels in chronic hepatitis D (CHD) patients. Here, we examined the NOSA titers and IgG levels of 40 patients with CHD and different disease courses and compared them to 70 patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection. 43% of CHD patients had previously undergone treatment with pegylated interferon-α (IFN-α). The antibody display of 46 untreated patients diagnosed with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) was used as a reference. The frequency of elevated NOSA titers (CHD 69% vs. CHB 43%, p < 0.01), and the median IgG levels (CHD 16.9 g/L vs. CHB 12.7 g/L, p < 0.01) were significantly higher in CHD patients than in patients with CHB, and highest in patients with AIH (96%, 19.5 g/L). Also, the antinuclear antibody pattern was homogeneous in many patients with AIH and unspecific in patients with viral hepatitis. Additionally, f-actin autoantibodies were only detectable in patients with AIH (39% of SMA). In CHD patients, IgG levels correlated with higher HDV viral loads, transaminases, and liver stiffness values. IgG levels and NOSA were similar in CHD patients irrespective of a previous IFN-α treatment. In summary, autoantibodies with an unspecific pattern are frequently detected in CHD patients with unclear clinical relevance.

Hepatitis delta virus: Disease assessment and stratification

Hepatitis D virus (HDV) causes one of the most severe forms of hepatitis in people with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection. Timely and accurate assessment of hepatitis delta virus (HDV) and disease stratification is mandatory for thorough pre-therapeutic evaluation for prioritizing treatment and outcome prediction. Viral biomarkers associated with HDV and hepatitis B virus (HBV) are crucial to aid in diagnosis, and monitoring of serum viral nucleic acids for both viruses is recommended. Liver biopsy remains the gold standard for staging of liver fibrosis and grading of histological activity and should remain central for diagnostic purposes, but is also of importance for research to enhance our understanding of HDV. The emergence of novel non-invasive tests for the assessment of liver fibrosis in HDV patients coupled with the well-recognized potential complications of liver biopsy has resulted in reduced utility of liver biopsy in clinical practice. Preliminary data suggest that these emerging non-invasive modalities appear to be reliable, and their use is supported, similar to other viral hepatitis. Nevertheless, further validation is required before their widespread adoption into clinical practice.

Autoimmune Hepatitis: Serum Autoantibodies in Clinical Practice

Circulating autoantibodies are a key diagnostic tool in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), being positive in 95% of the cases if tested according to dedicated guidelines issued by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group. They also allow the distinction between type 1 AIH, characterized by positive anti-nuclear and/or anti-smooth muscle antibody, and type 2 AIH, characterized by positive anti-liver kidney microsomal type 1 and/or anti-liver cytosol type 1 antibody. Anti-soluble liver antigen is the only AIH-specific autoantibody, and is found in 20-30% of both type 1 and type 2 AIH. Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody is frequently positive in type 1 AIH, being associated also with inflammatory bowel disease and with primary/autoimmune sclerosing cholangitis. The reference method for autoantibody testing remains indirect immunofluorescence on triple tissue (rodent liver, kidney and stomach), allowing both the detection of the majority of liver-relevant reactivities, including those autoantibodies whose molecular target antigens are unknown. Of note, the current knowledge of the clinical significance of autoantibodies relies on studies based on this technique. However, immunofluorescence requires trained laboratory personnel, is observer-dependent, and lacks standardization, leading to ongoing attempts at replacing this method with automated assays, the sensitivity, and specificity of which, however, require further studies before they can be used as a reliable alternative to immunofluorescence; currently, they may be used as complementary to immunofluorescence.

Autoantibodies in Autoimmune Liver Disease-Clinical and Diagnostic Relevance

Testing for liver-related autoantibodies should be included in the workup of patients with hepatitis or cholestasis of unknown origin. Although most of these autoantibodies are not disease specific, their determination is a prerequisite to diagnose autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), and they are components of the diagnostic scoring system in these diseases. In primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), on the other hand, autoantibodies are frequently present but play a minor role in establishing the diagnosis. In PSC, however, data on antibodies suggest a link between disease pathogenesis and the intestinal microbiota. This review will focus on practical aspects of antibody testing in the three major autoimmune liver diseases AIH, PBC, and PSC.

Autoantibodies in Autoimmune Hepatitis: Can Epitopes Tell Us about the Etiology of the Disease?

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) are serious autoimmune liver diseases that are characterized by a progressive destruction of the liver parenchyma and/or the hepatic bile ducts and the development of chronic fibrosis. Left untreated autoimmune liver diseases are often life-threatening, and patients require a liver transplantation to survive. Thus, an early and reliable diagnosis is paramount for the initiation of a proper therapy with immunosuppressive and/or anticholelithic drugs. Besides the analysis of liver biopsies and serum markers indicating liver damage, the screening for specific autoantibodies is an indispensable tool for the diagnosis of autoimmune liver diseases. Such liver autoantigen-specific antibodies might be involved in the disease pathogenesis, and their epitope specificity may give some insight into the etiology of the disease. Here, we will mainly focus on the generation and specificity of autoantibodies in AIH patients. In addition, we will review data from animal models that aim toward a better understanding of the origins and pathogenicity of such autoantibodies.

Contemporary issues and future directions in autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a severe life-threatening hepatopathy of unknown etiology, affecting both pediatric and adult populations, and characterised by inflammatory liver histology, circulating non-organ-specific autoantibodies, and hypergammaglobulinaemia. AIH is a very heterogeneous disease with a variety of clinical presentations, ranging from asymptomatic liver test abnormalities to acute severe hepatitis or even acute liver failure. It responds very well to immunosuppressive treatment with prednisolone with or without azathioprine. Patients who are intolerant or fail to respond to standard therapy are candidates for alternative immunosuppressive regimens, the combination of steroids with mycophenolate mofetil or calcineurin inhibitors being the most frequently reported. The pathogenesis of AIH remains not completely understood, although there is evidence that genetic predisposition, molecular mimicry and defective immunoregulatory mechanisms contribute to the autoimmune liver damage. Areas covered: A literature search was conducted using the key-words 'autoimmune hepatitis', 'immunogenetics', 'regulatory T-cells' and 'immunosuppression'. The aim of this review is to discuss recent breakthroughs in the understanding AIH pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. Expert commentary: Progress in the understanding of AIH pathogenesis is likely to contribute to the development of novel therapeutic strategies, such as the adoptive transfer of autologous expanded antigen-specific regulatory T-cells.

Cutting edge issues in autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a severe liver disease affecting all age groups worldwide. Novel basic and clinical aspects of AIH, addressed at a Monothematic Conference in London in September 2015, are highlighted in this review. The diagnosis of AIH relies upon detection of characteristic autoantibodies, hypergammaglobulinemia, and interface hepatitis on liver histology. The International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) has devised diagnostic scoring systems to help in comparative studies and clinical practice. AIH arises in a genetically predisposed host, when yet unknown triggers - such an encounter with a pathogen - lead to a T cell-mediated immune response targeting liver autoantigens. This immune response is inadequately controlled because regulatory mechanisms are impaired. The mainstay of treatment for AIH is immunosuppression, which should be instituted as soon as the diagnosis is made. Standard treatment regimens include relatively high doses of predniso(lo)ne, which are tapered gradually as azathioprine is introduced. Recent guidelines have described newer treatment regimens and have tightened the goal of therapy to complete normalization of biochemical, serological and histological parameters. Mycophenolate mofetil, calcineurin inhibitors, mTOR inhibitors and biological agents are potential salvage therapies, but should be reserved for selected non-responsive patients and administered only in experienced centers. Liver transplantation is a life-saving option for those patients who progress to end-stage liver disease. Further dissection of cellular and molecular pathways involved in AIH pathogenesis is likely to lead to the discovery of novel, tailored and better tolerated therapies.

Autoantibodies in Autoimmune Liver Diseases-Methods of Detection and Interpretation: An Update for the Reporting Pathologist

Autoimmune liver disease (AILD) is a type of chronic liver disease with autoimmune etiology. The diagnosis of the disease is multipronged and detection of autoantibodies in AILDs is an important diagnostic tool and it also helps in the classification of the disease. There are multiple autoantibodies that are detected in AILDs but none is diagnostic. Moreover, these autoantibodies are detected in many other pathological and nonpathological conditions. So the significance of seropositivity for these autoantibodies should be known by both the pathologists as well as the clinicians. In addition, there is prognostic significance associated with some of the antibodies and they also sometimes help in the disease monitoring. The whole array of antibodies detected in AILDs is discussed in detail in this review along with their clinical significance and interpretation.

Hepatitis D and hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatitis D virus (HDV) is a defective circular shape single stranded HDV RNA virus with two types of viral proteins, small and large hepatitis D antigens, surrounded by hepatitis B surface antigen. Superinfection with HDV in chronic hepatitis B is associated with a more threatening form of liver disease leading to rapid progression to cirrhosis. In spite of some controversy in the epidemiological studies, HDV infection does increase the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared to hepatitis B virus (HBV) monoinfection. Hepatic decompensation, rather than development of HCC, is the first usual clinical endpoint during the course of HDV infection. Oxidative stress as a result of severe necroinflammation may progress to HCC. The large hepatitis D antigen is a regulator of various cellular functions and an activator of signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)3 and the nuclear factor kappa B pathway. Another proposed epigenetic mechanism by which HCC may form is the aberrant silencing of tumor suppressor genes by DNA Methyltransferases. HDV antigens have also been associated with increased histone H3 acetylation of the clusterin promoter. This enhances the expression of clusterin in infected cells, increasing cell survival potential. Any contribution of HBV DNA integration with chromosomes of infected hepatocytes is not clear at this stage. The targeted inhibition of STAT3 and cyclophilin, and augmentation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ have a potential therapeutic role in HCC.

Autoantibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis has a variable clinical phenotype, and the absence of conventional autoantibodies does not preclude its diagnosis or need for treatment. The goals of this review are to describe the frequency and nature of autoantibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis, indicate its outcome after corticosteroid treatment, and increase awareness of the diagnosis in patients with unexplained acute and chronic hepatitis. The frequency of presumed autoantibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis in patients with acute and acute severe presentations is ≤7%, and its frequency in patients with chronic presentations is 1-34%. Patients with acute presentations can have normal serum γ-globulin levels, centrilobular zone 3 necrosis, and low pre-treatment international diagnostic scores. Liver tissue examination is essential for the diagnosis, and hepatic steatosis can be a co-morbid feature. The comprehensive international scoring system can support but never override the clinical diagnosis pre-treatment, and non-standard serological markers should be sought if the clinical diagnosis is uncertain or the diagnostic score is low. A 3-month treatment trial with corticosteroids should be considered in all patients, regardless of the serological findings, and improvements have occurred in 67-87% of cases. Autoantibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis may be associated with an autoantibody outside the conventional battery; it may have a signature autoantibody that is still undiscovered, or its characteristic autoantibodies may have been suppressed or have a delayed expression. The pathogenic mechanisms are presumed to be identical to those of classical disease. Autoantibody-negative autoimmune hepatitis is an infrequent but treatable disease that must be considered in unexplained acute and chronic hepatitis.

Hepatitis delta virus infection: open issues

Hepatitis delta virus (HDV) consists of a circular single-stranded RNA genome which assembles two viral proteins and acquires a lipid envelope in which the hepatitis B surface antigens (HBsAg) are embedded. HDV does not encode its own polymerase, but exploits a cellular enzyme for its replication. A better understanding of the mechanisms of HDV replication mechanism would provide new insights for antiviral strategies. Based on genomic variability, eight major genotypes of HDV have been identified, which differ as much as 40% in the nucleotide sequence. The cloning of HDV-RNA has provided genetic probes for the measurement of HDV-RNA in serum and liver; the sensitivity of HDV-RNA detection improved significantly when the reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique was introduced. As no commercial test is standardized for viral load detection, home-made assays have been developed in the different referral centers, which may not be comparable. Quantification of HDV in serum by real-time PCR has been recently proposed in the management of chronically infected patients. No specific inhibitors of HDV are available at present and, in spite of the crucial relationship between HDV and HBV, drugs that block HBV have only a theoretical but no sound effect on HDV replication.

Autoantibodies as prognostic markers in autoimmune liver disease

Certain autoantibodies in autoimmune liver disease have prognostic implications that are under-utilized and under-developed. The goals of this review are to indicate progress in characterizing the autoantibodies with prognostic connotations and to indicate the feasibility and importance of discovering other markers. Prime source and review articles in English were selected by a Medline search through 2010. Antibodies to soluble liver antigen, actin, liver cytosol type 1, asialoglycoprotein receptor, chromatin, cyclic citrullinated peptide, and uridine glucuronosyltransferases have been associated with the occurrence, severity, and progression of autoimmune hepatitis, and antibodies to Sp100, gp210, and centromere have had similar implications in primary biliary cirrhosis. Antibodies to soluble liver antigen have shown the most promise in autoimmune hepatitis as they have been associated with severe histological changes, long durations of treatment, relapse after drug withdrawal, and high frequency of liver failure. Antibodies to the nuclear rim pore protein, gp210, have shown the most promise in primary biliary cirrhosis as they have been associated with severe interface hepatitis, lobular inflammation, and progression to liver failure. The major limitations of the autoantibodies have been their lack of standardized assays, low negative predictabilities, and fluctuating levels. Performance parameters will improve as critical pathogenic pathways, comprehensive testing batteries, and standardized assays through international exchange workshops are developed. Progress has been made in identifying the serological markers of prognosis in autoimmune liver disease, and they promise to reflect critical disease mechanisms and enhance patient management.

Autoantibodies and liver disease: uses and abuses

Confirming whether a patient has autoimmune liver disease is challenging, given its varied presentation and complex definitions. In the continued absence of pathognomonic serum markers, diagnosis requires evaluation of laboratory investigations and, frequently, a liver biopsy - all of which need to be interpreted in the correct clinical context, with an emphasis on exclusion of viral infections, drug toxicity and metabolic disease. However, clear diagnosis is important for appropriate and timely therapy. Autoantibodies remain important tools for clinicians, and were the first proposed serological markers to aid in differentiating viral from chronic autoimmune hepatitis. Their presence is occasionally considered to be synonymous with autoimmune liver disease - a misinterpretation of their clinical significance. The present article summarizes the serum autoantibodies currently investigated in clinical and research practice, along with a description of their value in adult chronic liver diseases, with an emphasis on their appropriate use in the diagnosis and management of patients with autoimmune liver disease.

Advances in the diagnosis, pathogenesis, and management of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is characterized by chronic inflammation of the liver, interface hepatitis (based on histologic examination), hypergammaglobulinemia, and production of autoantibodies. Many clinical and basic science studies have provided important insights into the pathogenesis and treatment of AIH. Transgenic mice that express human antigens and develop autoantibodies, liver-infiltrating CD4(+) T cells, liver inflammation, and fibrosis have been developed as models of AIH. AIH has been associated with autoantibodies against members of the cytochrome P450 superfamily of enzymes, transfer RNA selenocysteine synthase, formiminotransferase cyclodeaminase, and the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferases, whereas alleles such as DRB1*0301 and DRB1*0401 are genetic risk factors in white North American and northern European populations. Deficiencies in the number and function of CD4(+)CD25(+) (regulatory) T cells disrupt immune homeostasis and might be corrected as a therapeutic strategy. Treatment can be improved by continuing corticosteroid therapy until normal liver test results and normal liver tissue are within normal limits, instituting ancillary therapies to prevent drug-related side effects, identifying problematic patients early, and providing long-term maintenance therapy after patients experience a first relapse. Calcineurin inhibitors and mycophenolate mofetil are potential salvage therapies, and reagents such as recombinant interleukin-10, abatacept, and CD3-specific antibodies are feasible as therapeutics. Liver transplantation is an effective salvage therapy, even in the elderly, and AIH must be considered in all patients with graft dysfunction after liver transplantation. Identification of the key defects in immune homeostasis and antigen targets will direct new therapies.

Serum autoantibodies: a road map for the clinical hepatologist

The widespread use of serum autoantibodies in the practice of clinical hepatology has led to novel challenges in the interpretation of results obtained with routine techniques, such as indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) or with recombinant antigens. In fact, the laboratory methods are often overlooked factors in the interpretation of data by the bedside clinician despite being critical in the interpretation of data. Importantly, the sensitivity and specificity of these serum hallmarks are not defined in all cases. Taken altogether, these observations point towards the need for a systematic discussion of autoimmune serology in the clinical setting of everyday practice. The target of this review article is therefore, to illustrate the current knowledge and available experimental evidence to guide the diagnostic and prognostic decision making in autoimmune and viral chronic liver diseases.

New insights to the immunopathology and autoimmune responses in primary biliary cirrhosis

Primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) is an autoimmune liver disease with profound changes in different compartments of the immune system, including those involved in innate, and adaptive immunity. New data from epidemiological studies of PBC have reinforced the thesis that the cause for this relatively uncommon disease is likely to be a combination of both environmental factors and a susceptible genetic predisposition. Recent findings of abnormalities of the innate immune system in PBC suggest that they may serve as links between the environmental factors and the early events in PBC development. Viral and bacterial infections as well as xenobiotics are some of the potential environmental factors that have been implicated in this complex process. Identification of the etiological factors for PBC will point to new preventive or therapeutic treatments.

Autoimmune hepatitis, from mechanisms to therapy

In 1950, Waldenström was the first to describe a chronic form of hepatitis in young women. Subsequently, the disease was found to be associated with other autoimmune syndromes and was later termed "lupoid hepatitis" because of the presence of antinuclear antibodies. In 1965, it became designated by Mackay et al. as "autoimmune hepatitis" at an international meeting, at which the general concept of autoimmunity was endorsed by the scientific community. In the early 1960s and 1970s, the value of immunosuppressive therapy with glucocorticoids and/or azathioprine was well documented in several studies. The original association of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) and HLA alleles, which has remarkably stood the test of time, was published in 1972. In the 1970s and 1980s, several autoantibodies were identified in patients with autoimmune hepatitis directed against proteins of the endoplasmatic reticulum expressed in liver and kidney and against soluble liver antigens. Subsequently, the molecular targets of these antibodies were identified and more precisely characterized. In the last two decades many additional pieces of the AIH puzzle have been collected leading to the identification of additional antibodies and genes associated with AIH and to the emergence of new therapeutic agents. Meanwhile, the immunoserological and genetic heterogeneity of AIH is well established and it has become obvious that clinical manifestations, disease behavior, and treatment outcome may vary by racial groups, geographical regions and genetic predisposition. Currently, the International Autoimmune hepatitis group is endorsing multi-center collaborative studies to more precisely define the features at disease presentation and to define prognostic indices and appropriate treatment algorithms. Given the importance of serological testing, the IAHG is also working on guidelines and procedures for more reliable and standardized testing of autoantibodies.

Natural Course and Treatment of Hepatitis D Virus Infection

Hepatitis D virus (HDV) is a subviral satellite with hepatitis B virus (HBV) as its natural helper virus. After entry into hepatocytes, it utilizes host cellular enzymes to replicate by a double-rolling-circle mechanism. HDV is most often transmitted by contact with contaminated blood and body fluid, similar to HBV infection. Approximately 5% of the global HBV carriers are coinfected with HDV, leading to a total of 10-15 million HDV carriers worldwide. HDV infection can occur concurrently with HBV infection (coinfection) or in a patient with established HBV infection (superinfection). The pathogenesis of HDV remains controversial. A decline in the prevalence of both acute and chronic hepatitis D (CHD) has been observed worldwide. At present, therapy for chronic HDV infection is by the use of interferon-alpha. Compared to chronic hepatitis B or C, CHD treatment requires a higher dosage and a longer duration of treatment, and post-treatment relapses are common. In order to prevent the progression of CHD and its related morbidity and mortality, more effective treatments are needed.

Autoantibodies directed against the UDP-glucuronosyltransferases in human autoimmune hepatitis

Liver-Kidney Microsomes Type 3 (LKM3) autoantibodies (aAbs) have been described in chronic hepatitis D virus infection in 1983. The detection of such aAbs in autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) Type 2 was thereafter reported. The molecular targets of LKM3 aAbs have been identified as enzymes belonging to the UDP-glucuronosyltransferase family 1. Since 20-30% of suspected AIH are negative for the classical autoimmune serological markers, such as aAbs directed against antinuclear autoantibodies, smooth muscle autoantibodies and Liver-Kidney Microsomes Type 1 aAbs, LKM3 aAbs could be of great interest in the diagnosis of such negative AIH. In this review, we discuss the sensitivity and specificity of these aAbs in AIH in order to stress out their potential clinical use as a marker.

Autoantibodies and autoantigens in autoimmune hepatitis: important tools in clinical practice and to study pathogenesis of the disease

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic necroinflammatory disease of the liver characterized by hypergammaglobulinemia, characteristic autoantibodies, association with HLA DR3 or DR4 and a favorable response to immunosuppressive treatment. The etiology is unknown. The detection of non-organ and liver-related autoantibodies remains the hallmark for the diagnosis of the disease in the absence of viral, metabolic, genetic, and toxic etiology of chronic hepatitis or hepatic injury. The current classification of AIH and the several autoantibodies/target-autoantigens found in this disease are reported. Current aspects on the significance of these markers in the differential diagnosis and the study of pathogenesis of AIH are also stated. AIH is subdivided into two major types; AIH type 1 (AIH-1) and type 2 (AIH-2). AIH-1 is characterized by the detection of smooth muscle autoantibodies (SMA) and/or antinuclear antibodies (ANA). Determination of antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies (ANCA), antibodies against the asialoglycoprotein receptor (anti-ASGP-R) and antibodies against to soluble liver antigens or liver-pancreas (anti-SLA/LP) may be useful for the identification of patients who are seronegative for ANA/SMA. AIH-2 is characterized by the presence of specific autoantibodies against liver and kidney microsomal antigens (anti-LKM type 1 or infrequently anti-LKM type 3) and/or autoantibodies against liver cytosol 1 antigen (anti-LC1). Anti-LKM-1 and anti-LKM-3 autoantibodies are also detected in some patients with chronic hepatitis C (HCV) and chronic hepatitis D (HDV). Cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) has been documented as the major target-autoantigen of anti-LKM-1 autoantibodies in both AIH-2 and HCV infection. Recent convincing data demonstrated the expression of CYP2D6 on the surface of hepatocytes suggesting a pathogenetic role of anti-LKM-1 autoantibodies for the liver damage. Family 1 of UDP-glycuronosyltransferases has been identified as the target-autoantigen of anti-LKM-3. For these reasons the distinction between AIH and chronic viral hepatitis (especially of HCV) is of particular importance. Recently, the molecular target of anti-SLA/LP and anti-LC1 autoantibodies were identified as a 50 kDa UGA-suppressor tRNA-associated protein and a liver specific enzyme, the formiminotransferase cyclodeaminase, respectively. Anti-ASGP-R and anti-LC1 autoantibodies appear to correlate closely with disease severity and response to treatment suggesting a pathogenetic role of these autoantibodies for the hepatocellular injury. In general however, autoantibodies should not be used to monitor treatment, predict AIH activity or outcome. Finally, the current aspects on a specific form of AIH that may develop in some patients with a rare genetic syndrome, the autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy syndrome (APECED) are also given. Autoantibodies against liver microsomes (anti-LM) are the specific autoantibodies detected in AIH as a disease component of APECED but also in cases of dihydralazine-induced hepatitis. Cytochrome P450 1A2 has been identified as the target-autoantigen of anti-LM autoantibodies in both APECED-related AIH and dihydralazine-induced hepatitis. The latter may indicate that similar autoimmune pathogenetic mechanisms can lead to liver injury in susceptible individuals irrespective of the primary defect. Characterization of the autoantigen-autoantibody repertoire continues to be an attractive and important tool to get access to the correct diagnosis and to gain insight into the as yet unresolved mystery of how hepatic tolerance is given up and AIH ensues.

Autoimmunity and hepatitis C

Hepatitis C is a widespread chronic liver disease leading to cirrhosis and to the complications of portal hypertension. Based on biochemical and clinical features, it is almost indistinguishable from autoimmune hepatitis, which is characterized by the absence of viral infection, and other causes of chronic liver diseases, and represents a classical autoimmune disease with loss of immunological tolerance of liver tissue. Although the differentiation between both diseases is not difficult due the availability of diagnostic viral markers, it is well recognized that not only are autoantibodies present in autoimmune hepatitis frequently detected in hepatitis C, but also that an array of immune-mediated symptoms and diseases occur in patients with chronic hepatitis C. This has prompted research aimed at identifying a link between hepatitis C and autoimmunity, and autoimmune hepatitis in particular. This review focuses on the general immunological mechanisms linking viral infections with autoimmunity and includes the specific features of hepatitis C- and D-associated autoimmunity. Virus infection remains at the center of molecular and cellular research aimed at identifying the forces driving human autoimmunity and autoimmune diseases.

Autoantibodies in the diagnosis and management of liver disease

Autoantibodies are nonpathogenic manifestations of immune reactivity, and they may occur in acute and chronic liver diseases. Autoantibodies may be consequences rather than causes of the liver injury, and they should be regarded as diagnostic clues rather than etiologic markers. Conventional autoantibodies used in the categorization of autoimmune liver disease are antinuclear antibodies, smooth muscle antibodies, antibodies to liver/kidney microsome type 1, antimitochondrial antibodies, and atypical perinuclear anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies. Ancillary autoantibodies that enhance diagnostic specificity, have prognostic connotation, or direct treatment are antibodies to endomysium, tissue transglutaminase, histones, doubled-stranded DNA, and actin. Autoantibodies that have an emerging diagnostic and prognostic significance are antibodies to soluble liver antigen/liver pancreas, asialoglycoprotein receptor, liver cytosol type 1, and nuclear pore complex antigens. Autoantibodies of uncertain clinical value that remain under investigation are antibodies to chromatin, lactoferrin, and Saccharomyces cervisiae. Continued recognition and characterization of autoantibodies should improve diagnostic precision, provide prognostic indices, and elucidate target autoantigens. These advances may in turn clarify pathogenic mechanisms, facilitate the development of animal models, and generate novel site-specific therapies.

Autoimmunity and viruses

Although viruses are commonly cited as triggers for autoimmune disease, the actual mechanisms by which they initiate autoimmunity are unknown. Molecular mimicry is the most popular hypothesis, and it proposes that viral antigens that share homologies with host antigens generate an immune response that damages host tissue. The viral antigen may not be needed for perpetuation of the disease, and cross-reacting immune responses can involve humoral, cellular, or both types of reactivity. Linear and conformational epitopes may be involved, and foreign antigens do not need to share exact amino acid sequences with self-proteins to activate autoreactive T cells. Bystander effects can enhance the autoimmune process if previously sequestered or cryptic antigens are exposed to the immune system, and superantigens that are produced by the pathogen and are not MHC restricted can result in marked polyclonal activation of CD4 and CD8 T cells. Future studies must differentiate the targets of pathologic immunity and distinguish self-antigens from infectious nonself-antigens. Transgenic animal models of AIH are needed to assess the pathogenicity of the antigenic targets.

Autoantibodies and defined target autoantigens in autoimmune hepatitis: an overview

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a disease of unknown aetiology characterised by hypergammaglobulinaemia, non-organ and liver-related autoantibodies, association with HLA-DR3 or DR4 and a favourable response to immunosuppression. The current classification of AIH and the several autoantibodies/target autoantigens found in this disease are reported. The importance of these markers in the differential diagnosis and the study of pathogenesis of AIH is also given. AIH is subdivided into two major types: AIH type 1 (AIH-1) and AIH type 2 (AIH-2). AIH-1 is characterised by the detection of smooth muscle autoantibodies (SMA) and/or antinuclear antibodies (ANA). Antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies (ANCA), in most cases of perinuclear pattern (p-ANCA), by the indirect immunofluorescence assay, antibodies against the asialoglycoprotein receptor (anti-ASGP-R) and antibodies to soluble liver antigens or liver-pancreas (anti-SLA/LP) may be useful for the identification of individuals who are seronegative for ANA/SMA. AIH-2 is characterised by the presence of specific autoantibodies against liver and kidney microsomal antigens (anti-LKM type 1 or infrequently anti-LKM type 3) and/or autoantibodies against liver cytosol 1 antigen (anti-LC1). Anti-LKM-1 and anti-LKM-3 autoantibodies are also detected in some patients with chronic hepatitis C (HCV) and chronic hepatitis D (HDV). For these reasons, the distinction between AIH and chronic viral hepatitis is of particular importance. Cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) is the major target autoantigen of anti-LKM-1 autoantibodies in both conditions (AIH-2 and HCV infection). Recent data have demonstrated the expression of CYP2D6 on the surface of hepatocytes, suggesting a pathogenetic role of anti-LKM-1 autoantibodies in liver injury. Family 1 of UDP-glycuronosyltransferases has been identified as the target autoantigen of anti-LKM-3. The molecular target of anti-SLA/LP autoantibodies has been identified recently as a 50 kDa protein with unknown structure and function. A liver-specific enzyme, the formiminotransferase cyclodeaminase, was identified as the target autoantigen of anti-LC1 autoantibodies. Anti-ASGP-R and anti-LC1 autoantibodies appear to correlate better with the severity of AIH and the response to treatment. The latter may suggest a pathogenic role of these autoantibodies in the hepatocellular damage in AIH. In general, however, autoantibodies should not be used to monitor treatment or to predict AIH activity or outcome. Finally, current knowledge concerning a specific form of AIH that may develop in some patients with a rare genetic syndrome, the autoimmune polyglandular syndrome type-1 (APS-1), is also discussed. Autoantibodies against liver microsomes (anti-LM) are the specific autoantibodies found in AIH as a disease component of APS-1. However, anti-LM autoantibodies have also been described in cases of dihydralazine-induced hepatitis. Cytochrome P450 1A2 has been identified as the target autoantigen of anti-LM autoantibodies in both disease entities.

Mechanisms of liver injury relevant to pediatric hepatology

Hepatocyte injury and necrosis from many causes may result in pediatric liver disease. Influenced by other cell types in the liver, by its unique vascular arrangements, by lobular zonation, and by contributory effects of sepsis, reactive oxygen species and disordered hepatic architecture, the hepatocyte is prone to injury from exogenous toxins, from inborn errors of metabolism, from hepatotrophic viruses, and from immune mechanisms. Experimental studies on cultured hepatocytes or animal models must be interpreted with caution. Having discussed general concepts, this review describes immune mechanisms of liver injury, as seen in autoimmune hepatitis, hepatitis B and C infection, the anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome, and autoimmune polyendocrinopathy. Of the monogenic disorders causing significant liver injury in childhood, alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency and Niemann-Pick C disease demonstrate the effect of endoplasmic or endosomal retention of macromolecules. Tyrosinemia illustrates how understanding the biochemical defect leads to understanding cell injury, extrahepatic porphyric effects, oncogenesis, pharmacological intervention, and possible stem cell therapy. Pathogenesis of cirrhosis in galactosemia remains incompletely understood. In hereditary fructose intolerance, phosphate sequestration causes ATP depletion. Recent information about mitochondrial disease, NASH, disorders of glycosylation, Wilson's disease, and the progressive familial intrahepatic cholestases is discussed.

Increased incidence of anti-LKM autoantibodies in a consecutive cohort of hepatitis C patients from central Greece

OBJECTIVES

In Greece, there are insufficient data regarding the presence of non-organ and liver-related autoantibodies in hepatitis C patients. This study in a consecutive cohort of 39 such patients from central Greece investigates (1) the prevalence of non-organ and liver-related autoantibodies, and (2) the reactivity of anti-liver-kidney microsomal type 1 antibodies (in the case of positivity with at least one of the methods used) against their molecularly defined antigens.

DESIGN

All serum samples were tested by standard and molecular assays for the presence of anti-nuclear antibodies, smooth muscle antibodies, anti-liver-kidney microsomal type 1 antibodies, antibodies against parietal cells, anti-CYP2A6, anti-CYP1A2 and anti-CYP2D6 autoantibodies.

METHODS

Indirect immunofluorescence, competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, immunoblotting and novel radioligand assays based on immunoprecipitation of [35S]-methionine labelled recombinant CYP2A6, CYP1A2 and CYP2D6 His-taq fusion proteins produced by in vitro transcription/translation were used.

RESULTS

Seven out of 39 patients (17.9%) tested positive for smooth muscle antibodies, 2/39 (5.1%) tested positive for anti-nuclear antibodies, 1/39 (2.5%) tested positive for parietal cell antibodies, and 4/39 (10.3%) were found to be anti-liver-kidney microsomal positive (with at least one of the methods used). All sera were negative for anti-CYP2A6 and anti-CYP1A2 autoantibodies. Three out of four anti-liver-kidney microsomal positive samples had the typical liver-kidney microsomal staining pattern shown by indirect immunofluorescence. However, none tested positive for anti-CYP2D6 autoantibodies using the competitive CYP2D6 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, the specific CYP2D6 radioligand assay, and western blot using either human microsomes or recombinant CYP2D6. The fourth patient tested negative for anti-liver-kidney autoantibodies by either indirect immunofluorescence or the competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, but was repeatedly positive for anti-CYP2D6 autoantibodies by the sensitive and specific radioligand assay. Western blot experiments using human microsomes in this patient serum revealed two bands of 50 kDa and 55 kDa that documented as anti-CYP2D6 and anti-uridine triphosphate glucuronosyltransferase autoantibodies when recombinant CYP2D6 and recombinant uridine triphosphate glucuronosyltransferase autoantigens were used for immunoblot, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A relatively high incidence of anti-liver-kidney microsomal autoantibodies (10.3%) was found in a consecutive sample of Greek patients with hepatitis C. The expanded panel of assays, however, failed to document CYP2D6 as the target autoantigen of anti-liver-kidney microsomal autoantibodies in most patients. We report for the first time the detection of parietal cell antibodies and both anti-CYP2D6 (anti-liver-kidney microsomal type 1) and anti-uridine triphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (anti-liver-kidney microsomal type 3) autoantibodies in patients who were hepatitis C positive/hepatitis D negative. Further studies are needed to confirm our findings and to determine whether these preliminary results have a clinical importance or not.

Current concepts in the diagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment of autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis has a global distribution and affects all ages. Genetic factors strongly influence susceptibility, clinical expression, and treatment response. The diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis has been codified by an international panel. An acute or fulminant presentation is recognized but not a cholestatic form. Subclassifications by predominant autoantibody profile have been proposed, but they lack etiologic and prognostic differences. Autoantibodies continue to be characterized to improve diagnostic specificity, predict outcome, and identify pertinent antigenic targets. Cytosolic enzymes are prime candidates as autoantigens. DRB1*0301 and DRB1*0401 are the susceptibility alleles in Caucasoid Northern Europeans and North Americans, and they also affect clinical expression and treatment outcome. Other autoimmune promoters affecting cytokine production and immunocyte activation may act in synergy with the susceptibility alleles to affect disease behavior. Cell-mediated and antibody-dependent forms of cytotoxicity are probably interactive pathogenic mechanisms, and novel site-specific therapies are feasible because these mechanisms are defined. Potent new immunosuppressive agents are emerging from the transplantation arena, but prednisone alone or in combination with azathioprine remains the mainstay of treatment. Corticosteroid therapy is effective but not ideal.

Xenobiotic considerations for the development of autoimmune liver diseases: bad genes and bad luck

The etiologic origins of autoimmune disease remain an enigma. Although considerable information on the mechanisms of immunopathology has been acquired, in part from murine models, such mechanisms have yet to be substantiated in human autoimmune disease. This absence of validation is especially true for organ-specific diseases like those affecting the liver. In this review we focus on the putative role of xenobiotics as inducing agents for autoimmune liver pathology. In particular, we discuss the autoantibody immune response, the humoral hallmark of autoimmune disease, as well as cellular immune responses. We believe that exposure to environmental factors, namely xenobiotics, is the initiating straw that breaks the camel's back, leading to the loss of tolerance to self proteins in genetically susceptible hosts. The end result is a perpetuating process that is determined by the governing features of the genetics of the host and by exposure to the inciting environmental agent. Interestingly, the liver, an organ that plays a major role in immune tolerance, can itself become the target of autoreactivity and immune destruction.

Hepatitis C and D, retroviruses and autoimmune manifestations

Chronic infections with hepatitis C virus (HCV) are associated with various autoimmune manifestations, i.e. mixed cryoglobulinemia, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, autoimmune thyroid diseases, sporadic porphyria cutanea tarda and B cell lymphoma. Since exacerbation of hepatitis occurs in 5-10% of HCV patients receiving interferon-alpha treatment and may be successfully treated by immunosuppression afterwards, hepatitis C was also suspected to be associated with autoimmune hepatitis. LKM3 autoantibodies in chronic hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection and epitope recognition are discussed. Lately, endogenous and exogenous retroviruses have been investigated for the induction of autoimmune diseases. Human A type retroviral particles (HIAP), reverse transcriptase activity and anti-HIAP autoantibodies were detected in patients with Sjögren's syndrome. Anti-HIAP and anti-HIV p24 autoantibodies are seen in systemic lupus erythematosus, primary biliary cirrhosis and multiple sclerosis. Multiple sclerosis was even associated with a new human retrovirus called multiple sclerosis associated retrovirus (MSRV). In diabetes long terminal repeats (LTR) were detected in the HLA DQB1 locus, which was shown to associate with an increased risk of diabetes. A second retrovirus called IDDMK(1,2)22 was reported to code for a superantigen, which was implicated as a potential cause of diabetes. This hypothesis, however, was challenged repeatedly. Until now it is unknown whether endogenous retroviruses are aetiological agents of autoimmune diseases or an epiphenomenon, induced by coinfecting viruses (e.g. herpes viruses) and inflammatory processes.

LKM3 autoantibodies in hepatitis C cirrhosis: a further phenomenon of the HCV-induced autoimmunity

Chronic hepatitis C is frequently associated with laboratory markers-including LKM1 autoantibodies--of autoimmunity. A 62-yr-old woman with hepatitis C cirrhosis presented autoantibodies against liver and kidney microsomal proteins. By further evaluation of autoantibodies using ELISA and immunoblotting LKM1 and LKM3 autoantibodies could be revealed. The target antigen of LKM3 autoantibodies proved to be UGT-1.1 isoenzyme. In the absence of chronic hepatitis D infection or autoimmune hepatitis type 2, this is the first case that reports the occurrence of LKM3 autoantibodies in HCV-induced chronic liver disease.

Human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases: metabolism, expression, and disease

In vertebrates, the glucuronidation of small lipophilic agents is catalyzed by the endoplasmic reticulum UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs). This metabolic pathway leads to the formation of water-soluble metabolites originating from normal dietary processes, cellular catabolism, or exposure to drugs and xenobiotics. This classic detoxification process, which led to the discovery nearly 50 years ago of the cosubstrate UDP-glucuronic acid (19), is now known to be carried out by 15 human UGTs. Characterization of the individual gene products using cDNA expression experiments has led to the identification of over 350 individual compounds that serve as substrates for this superfamily of proteins. This data, coupled with the introduction of sophisticated RNA detection techniques designed to elucidate patterns of gene expression of the UGT superfamily in human liver and extrahepatic tissues of the gastrointestinal tract, has aided in understanding the contribution of glucuronidation toward epithelial first-pass metabolism. In addition, characterization of the UGT1A locus and genetic studies directed at understanding the role of bilirubin glucuronidation and the biochemical basis of the clinical symptoms found in unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia have uncovered the structural gene polymorphisms associated with Crigler-Najjar's and Gilbert's syndrome. The role of the UGTs in metabolism and different disease states in humans is the topic of this review.

Autoimmune hepatitis

Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a rare disease, characterized by female predominance, hypergammaglobulinemia, autoantibodies, association with HLA DR3 and HLA DR4 and a good response to immunosuppression. Different subtypes of AIH may be distinguished, based on differences in the autoantibody patterns. AIH type 1 is characterized by anti-nuclear (ANA) and/or anti-smooth muscular (SMA) autoantibodies. AIH type 2 is characterized by liver/kidney microsomal autoantibodies (LKM). AIH type 3 may be distinguished by autoantibodies to soluble liver proteins (SLA) or the liver pancreas antigen (LP). AIH-2 affects predominantly pediatric patients and is characterized by a more severe clinical course, a higher frequency of relapse under immunosuppressive treatment and a more frequent progression to cirrhosis. In contrast, AIH types 1 and 3 show a higher age of onset and a better long-term response to immunosuppressive treatment. At present, the treatment of choice is prednisone alone or a combination with prednisone and azathioprine. Both treatment protocols show high survival rates. However, a rate of 13% of treatment failures and the failure to induce permanent remission in most patients underlines the urgent need to develop additional treatment regimens. A yet unknown genetic predisposition is believed to act as the underlying etiological factor in AIH. This genetic predisposition includes a few known risk factors such as the presence of HLA DR3 or HLA DR4, deletions of C4A alleles and female gender. Furthermore, it has to be postulated that defects in immunoregulatory genes exist. A model for such defects may be the autoimmune polyglandular syndrome type 1 (APS1), which results from the defects in a single gene, the autoimmune regulator type 1 (AIRE-1). Patients with APS1 suffer from mucocutaneous candidiasis and a number of organ-specific autoimmune diseases. Characteristic is a high variability in the number and character of the disease components in APS1, indicating that other genetic and environmental factors may strongly modulate the outcome of disease. Environmental factors may comprise chemical influences, such as nutritional compounds and drugs, or virus infections. Several drugs or chemicals were shown to induce hepatitis with autoimmune involvement, e.g. tienilic acid, dihydralazine and halothane. Adduct formation of an activated metabolite is believed to act as a trigger and to induce a specific immune response. Similarly, viruses were repeatedly shown to trigger autoimmune hepatitis. In virus infections, sequence similarities between viral and self-proteins may trigger autoimmune processes and the simultaneous presence of inflammatory cytokines during virus infection may further increase the risk of developing self-perpetuating autoimmune reactions which overshoot.

Autoantigen characterization in liver/kidney microsome positive hepatitis

Liver/kidney microsome autoantibodies are detectable in different forms of chronic hepatitis, namely autoimmune, viral, and drug-induced hepatitis and in hepatitis associated with Type 1 autoimmune polyglandular syndrome. Based on the aetiology of chronic hepatitis, liver/kidney microsome autoantibodies are directed against different enzymes with very little overlap. Thus, the simple Indirect Immunofluorescence test, which is universally used as a screening test to detect autoantibodies, does not allow subtyping of liver/kidney microsome autoantibodies. This brief review stresses the need to use methods such as Western-Blotting and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay together with Indirect Immunofluorescence to characterize the liver/kidney microsome autoantibodies. Identification of the liver/kidney microsome target antigens, when possible, makes differential diagnosis easier and, at times, may help the clinician to choose the best approach to treatment.

Regulation and function of family 1 and family 2 UDP-glucuronosyltransferase genes (UGT1A, UGT2B) in human oesophagus

Human UDP-glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) are expressed in a tissue-specific fashion in hepatic and extrahepatic tissues [Strassburg, Manns and Tukey (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 8719-8726]. Previous work suggests that these enzymes play a protective role in chemical carcinogenesis [Strassburg, Manns and Tukey (1997) Cancer Res. 57, 2979-2985]. In this study, UGT1 and UGT2 gene expression was investigated in human oesophageal epithelium and squamous-cell carcinoma in addition to the characterization of individual UGT isoforms using recombinant protein. UGT mRNA expression was characterized by duplex reverse transcriptase-PCR analysis and revealed the expression of UGT1A7, UGT1A8, UGT1A9 and UGT1A10 mRNAs. UGT1A1, UGT1A3, UGT1A4, UGT1A5 and UGT1A6 transcripts were not detected. UGT2 expression included UGT2B7, UGT2B10 and UGT2B15, but UGT2B4 mRNA was absent. UGT2 mRNA was present at significantly lower levels than UGT1 transcripts. This observation was in agreement with the analysis of catalytic activities in oesophageal microsomal protein, which was characterized by high glucuronidation rates for phenolic xenobiotics, all of which are classical UGT1 substrates. Whereas UGT1A9 was not regulated, differential regulation of UGT1A7 and UGT1A10 mRNA was observed between normal oesophageal epithelium and squamous-cell carcinoma. Expression and analysis in vitro of recombinant UGT1A7, UGT1A9, UGT1A10, UGT2B7 and UGT2B15 demonstrated that UGT1A7, UGT1A9 and UGT1A10 catalysed the glucuronidation of 7-hydroxybenzo(alpha)pyrene, as well as other environmental carcinogens, such as 2-hydroxyamino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo-(4, 5-beta)-pyridine. Although UGT1A9 was not regulated in the carcinoma tissue, the five-fold reduction in 7-hydroxybenzo(alpha)pyrene glucuronidation could be attributed to regulation of UGT1A7 and UGT1A10. These data elucidate an individual regulation of human UGT1A and UGT2B genes in human oesophagus and provide evidence for specific catalytic activities of individual human UGT isoforms towards environmental carcinogens that have been implicated in cellular carcinogenesis.

Small intestinal UDP-glucuronosyltransferase sheUGT1A07: partial purification and cDNA cloning from sheep small intestine

A phenol UDPglucuronosyltransferase (UGT) was partially purified, and the cDNA encoding the isoform was cloned and sequenced from sheep small intestine. The purified preparation containing a one major band (57 kDa) and one minor band (50 kDa) revealed high activities toward xenobiotics such as 1-naphthol (1-NA), 4-nitrophenol, and 4-methylumbelliferone. The preparation, however, had only little activity toward 4-hydroxybiphenyl and no activity toward bilirubin, suggesting that the preparation contains UGT1 isoforms. The NH2-terminal amino acid sequence of the major band was determined to be Gly-Lys-Leu-Leu-Val-Val-Pro-Met-Asp-Gly-Ser. A full-length UGT cDNA was obtained by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction with the degenerated 5'-primer from the NH2-terminal amino acid sequence of the purified major one and rapid amplification of cDNA ends from sheep small intestine. The cloned cDNA named sheUGT1A07 by amino acid similarity has a NH2-terminus sequence identical to that of the purified major one. Another phenol UGT cDNA named sheUGT1A6 was also cloned from sheep liver. sheUGT1A6 was expressed mainly in the liver, whereas sheUGT1A07 mRNA was expressed almost only in the alimentary organs, suggesting that sheUGT1A6 plays a role as a general drug metabolizing UGT isoform in the liver and sheUGT1A07 plays important role in the xenobiotics glucuronidation in the sheep small intestine.