Practical approach to analgesia and sedation in the neonatal intensive care unit

Opioids for newborn infants receiving mechanical ventilation

BACKGROUND

Mechanical ventilation is a potentially painful and discomforting intervention that is widely used in neonatal intensive care. Newborn infants demonstrate increased sensitivity to pain, which may affect clinical and neurodevelopmental outcomes. The use of drugs that reduce pain might be important in improving survival and neurodevelopmental outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the benefits and harms of opioid analgesics for neonates (term or preterm) receiving mechanical ventilation compared to placebo or no drug, other opioids, or other analgesics or sedatives.

SEARCH METHODS

We used the standard search strategy of Cochrane Neonatal to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2020, Issue 9), in the Cochrane Library; MEDLINE via PubMed (1966 to 29 September 2020); Embase (1980 to 29 September 2020); and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (1982 to 29 September 2020). We searched clinical trials databases, conference proceedings, and the reference lists of retrieved articles for randomised controlled trials and quasi-randomised trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing opioids to placebo or no drug, to other opioids, or to other analgesics or sedatives in newborn infants on mechanical ventilation. We excluded cross-over trials. We included term (≥ 37 weeks' gestational age) and preterm (< 37 weeks' gestational age) newborn infants on mechanical ventilation. We included any duration of drug treatment and any dosage given continuously or as bolus; we excluded studies that gave opioids to ventilated infants for procedures.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

For each of the included trials, we independently extracted data (e.g. number of participants, birth weight, gestational age, types of opioids) using Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group (EPOC) criteria and assessed the risk of bias (e.g. adequacy of randomisation, blinding, completeness of follow-up). We evaluated treatment effects using a fixed-effect model with risk ratio (RR) for categorical data and mean difference (MD) for continuous data. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 23 studies (enrolling 2023 infants) published between 1992 and 2019. Fifteen studies (1632 infants) compared the use of morphine or fentanyl versus placebo or no intervention. Four studies included both term and preterm infants, and one study only term infants; all other studies included only preterm infants, with five studies including only very preterm infants. We are uncertain whether opioids have an effect on the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) Scale in the first 12 hours after infusion (MD -5.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) -6.88 to -4.59; 50 participants, 2 studies) and between 12 and 48 hours after infusion (MD -0.98, 95% CI -1.35 to -0.61; 963 participants, 3 studies) because of limitations in study design, high heterogeneity (inconsistency), and imprecision of estimates (very low-certainty evidence - GRADE). The use of morphine or fentanyl probably has little or no effect in reducing duration of mechanical ventilation (MD 0.23 days, 95% CI -0.38 to 0.83; 1259 participants, 7 studies; moderate-certainty evidence because of unclear risk of bias in most studies) and neonatal mortality (RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.55; 1189 participants, 5 studies; moderate-certainty evidence because of imprecision of estimates). We are uncertain whether opioids have an effect on neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 24 months (RR 2.00, 95% CI 0.39 to 10.29; 78 participants, 1 study; very low-certainty evidence because of serious imprecision of the estimates and indirectness). Limited data were available for the other comparisons (i.e. two studies (54 infants) on morphine versus midazolam, three (222 infants) on morphine versus fentanyl, and one each on morphine versus diamorphine (88 infants), morphine versus remifentanil (20 infants), fentanyl versus sufentanil (20 infants), and fentanyl versus remifentanil (24 infants)). For these comparisons, no meta-analysis was conducted because outcomes were reported by one study.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We are uncertain whether opioids have an effect on pain and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 24 months; the use of morphine or fentanyl probably has little or no effect in reducing the duration of mechanical ventilation and neonatal mortality. Data on the other comparisons planned in this review (opioids versus analgesics; opioids versus other opioids) are extremely limited and do not allow any conclusions. In the absence of firm evidence to support a routine policy, opioids should be used selectively - based on clinical judgement and evaluation of pain indicators - although pain measurement in newborns has limitations.

Pain management in newborns

As a standard of care for preterm/term newborns effective pain management may improve their clinical and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Neonatal pain is assessed using context-specific, validated, and objective pain methods, despite the limitations of currently available tools. Therapeutic approaches reducing invasive procedures and using pharmacologic, behavioral, or environmental measures are used to manage neonatal pain. Nonpharmacologic approaches like kangaroo care, facilitated tucking, non-nutritive sucking, sucrose, and others can be used for procedural pain or adjunctive therapy. Local/topical anesthetics, opioids, NSAIDs/acetaminophen and other sedative/anesthetic agents can be incorporated into NICU protocols for managing moderate/severe pain or distress in all newborns.

Psychometric evaluation of the Sophia Observation withdrawal symptoms scale in critically ill children

OBJECTIVE

The Sophia Observation withdrawal Symptoms scale is an instrument for screening benzodiazepine and opioid withdrawal syndrome in pediatric critical care patients. The objectives of this study were to establish cutoff scores and to test sensitivity to change. Second, risk factors for withdrawal syndrome were explored.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study with repeated measures.

SETTING

Level IV ICU at a university children's hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 154 children with median age 5 months (interquartile range, 0-42 mo) who received continuous infusion of benzodiazepines and/or opioids for 5 or more days.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Nurses repeatedly applied the Sophia Observation withdrawal Symptoms scale and the Numeric Rating Scale withdrawal when children were weaned off benzodiazepines and opioids. The latter represents the nurse's expert opinion. We analyzed 3,754 paired assessments; the median number per child was 15 (interquartile range, 7-31) over a median of 5 days (interquartile range, 3-11 d). Sensitivity and specificity were 0.83 and 0.93, respectively, for the Sophia Observation withdrawal Symptoms scale cutoff score of 4 or higher against a Numeric Rating Scale-withdrawal score of 4 or higher. Sensitivity to change was determined by comparing 156 Sophia Observation withdrawal Symptoms scale assessments (n = 51 patients) before and after additional sedatives or opioids. Multilevel regression analysis showed a mean decline of 1.5 points (at score range 0-15) after intervention (p < 0.0001). Logistic regression analysis identified duration of preweaning of midazolam, duration of weaning of midazolam, duration of preweaning of morphine, duration of weaning of morphine, and number of additional sedatives/opioids as statistically significant risk factors for withdrawal syndrome in these children.

CONCLUSIONS

The Sophia Observation withdrawal Symptoms scale is a valid tool with good psychometric properties to assess withdrawal symptoms in PICU patients.

Rectal paracetamol in newborn infants after assisted vaginal delivery may increase pain response

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of paracetamol (acetaminophen) for neonatal pain relief.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial in 3 Swiss university hospitals. Term and near-term infants (n = 123) delivered by forceps or vacuum were randomized to receive 2 suppositories with paracetamol (60/80/100 mg in infants <3000 g/3000-4000 g/>4000 g birth weight) or placebo at 2 and 8 hours of life. Pain and discomfort during the first 24 hours was assessed by the échelle de douleur et d'inconfort du nouveau né [neonatal pain and discomfort scale] score. The response to the subsequent heel prick for metabolic screening at days 2-3 of life was investigated by the Bernese Pain Scale for Neonates (BPSN).

RESULTS

The échelle de douleur et d'inconfort du nouveau né [neonatal pain and discomfort scale] pain scale ratings after assisted vaginal delivery were low and declined within 4 hours of life (P < .01) irrespective of paracetamol administration. At 2-3 days of life, BPSN scores after heel prick were significantly higher in infants who had received paracetamol, compared with controls, both when BPSN were scored by nurses at the bedside (median [IQR] 4 [2-7] vs 2 [0-5], P = .017) or off-site from videos (4 [2-8] vs 2 [1-7], P = .04). Thirty-five of 62 (57%) infants treated with paracetamol cried after heel prick, compared with 25 of 61 (41%) controls (P = .086).

CONCLUSIONS

Infants born by assisted vaginal delivery have low pain scores in the immediate period after birth. Paracetamol given to newborns soon after birth may aggravate a subsequent stress response.

Biomarkers and clinical tools in critically ill children: are we heading toward tailored drug therapy?

In pediatric critical care, validated biomarkers are essential for guiding drug therapy. The aim of this article is to present examples of current biomarker developments in its full breadth, including biochemical substances, physiological measurements and clinical scoring tools, with a focus on the field of circulatory, renal and neurophysiologic failure. Within each field we consecutively discuss the rationale for the selected biomarkers, studies in critically ill children, biomarker validation stage and biomarker use or potential use in drug studies and clinical drug dosing. This article demonstrates that there is paucity of properly validated biomarkers. Nevertheless, recent developments in, for instance, the field of sepsis, point us toward a future wherein, for critically ill children, drug therapy may be personalized using proteomic profiling instead of a small number of biomarkers, in order to establish a personal and dynamic disease profile.

Stress response and procedural pain in the preterm newborn: the role of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments

Repeated invasive procedures occur routinely in neonates who require intensive care, causing pain at a time when it is developmentally unexpected. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that repeated and prolonged pain exposure alters their subsequent pain processing, long-term development, and behaviour. Primary outcome of this study was to evaluate the reduction of procedural pain induced by "heel-lances" in preterm newborns with three different treatment [administration of fentanyl (FE, 1-2 μg/kg), facilitated tucking (FT), sensorial saturation (SS)]. Secondary outcome was the measurement of the levels of cytokines as markers of stress correlated to pain. A prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing three different pharmacological or non-pharmacological treatments was performed involving 150 preterm newborn (gestational age 27-32 weeks). No other analgesic treatment was performed during the study. CRIES score was used to evaluate the procedural pain. The results showed that the reduction in the pain score was greater in FE and SS groups than FS group. The differences were statistically significant (p < 0.01). The levels of IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α were higher in the FT individuals than in the FE or SS-treated infants at 1 day (p < 0.01), at 3 days (p < 0.01), and at 7 days (p < 0.01) of life.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study suggest that FE and SS provide a superior analgesia in preterm neonates during procedural pain. In particular, sensorial saturation seems to be an important non-pharmacological alternative treatment to prevent and reduce the procedural pain in preterm newborn.

Anesthesia and analgesia in the NICU

Painful procedures in the neonatal intensive care unit are common, undertreated, and lead to adverse consequences. A stepwise approach to treatment should include pain recognition, assessment, and treatment, starting with nonpharmacologic and progressing to pharmacologic methods for increasing pain. The most common nonpharmacologic techniques include nonnutritive sucking with and without sucrose, kangaroo care, swaddling, and massage therapy. Drugs used to treat neonatal pain include the opiates, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, ketamine, propofol, acetaminophen, and local and topical anesthetics. The indications, advantages, and disadvantages of the commonly used analgesic drugs are discussed. Guidance and references for drugs and dosing for specific neonatal procedures are provided.

Local anaesthetic eye drops for prevention of pain in preterm infants undergoing screening for retinopathy of prematurity

BACKGROUND

Screening examinations for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) are performed routinely in the neonatal intensive care unit and are a recognised cause of pain in the newborn.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of instillation of topical anaesthetic eye drops compared with placebo or no treatment on pain in infants undergoing ROP screening.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We used the standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group. This included a search of the Cochrane Neonatal Group register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 10, 2010). We identified relevant studies by searching the following: (1) computerised bibliographic databases: MEDLINE (1966 to October 2010), EMBASE (1988 to October 2010) and Web of Science (1975 to March 2010; (2) the Oxford Database of Perinatal Trials. We searched electronically abstracts from PAS from 2000 to 2010 and handsearched abstracts from ESPR from 2000 to 2009.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised, or quasi-randomised controlled trials, or randomised cross-over trials.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used the standard methods of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified two studies for inclusion. Both studies were randomised cross-over trials performed in single centres. Both studies used the Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) score as a measure of pain response. Different methods of evaluating PIPP scores are presented including the absolute PIPP score, a PIPP score > 10 or > 12 and an increase in PIPP ≥ 4 from the baseline value. There is a nonsignificant reduction in pain scores at one minute and a nonsignificant increase at five minutes post insertion of the speculum. PIPP score > 12 at one minute resulted in a statistically significant reduction in the number of patients who experienced pain (typical risk ratio (RR) 0.56, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.89; typical risk difference (RD) -0.23, 95% CI -0.39 to -0.86; number needed to treat to benefit (NNTB) 4). When pain was defined as an increase in PIPP > 4 there was a statistically significant reduction in the absolute number of patients who experienced pain at one minute (typical RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.94; typical RD -0.19, 95% CI -0.34 to -0.04; NNTB 5.3).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The administration of topical proparacaine 30 seconds prior to the ophthalmological evaluation was associated with a reduction in pain scores especially at the time of speculum insertion. However, despite treatment, screening remains a painful procedure and the role of nonpharmacological and pharmacological intervention including different local anaesthetic agents should be ascertained in future randomised trials.

Pain management in newborns: from prevention to treatment

All neonates in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) or during the first days of life undergo painful and stressful procedures. Epidemiologic studies have shown that pain induced by these procedures is not effectively prevented or is inadequately treated. Pain experienced during the neonatal period may lead to negative outcomes, especially in preterm neonates. Prevention is the first step of pain management, and practical guidelines should be used in the NICU. Assessment must be done with adequate tools that take into account the infant's pathology and gestational age. Distinguishing between acute and prolonged pain is important for both assessment and treatment. The most common drugs that have been studied for the treatment of pain and stress are opioids, hypnosedatives, and NMDA receptor antagonists. Morphine and fentanyl are most frequently used for acute or prolonged pain in the NICU. They have potent analgesic effects and few immediate or long-term adverse effects. Midazolam is a commonly used hypnosedative, but its adverse effects limit its use. Drugs such as propofol and ketamine have been used for acute painful procedures; however, further research is needed to assess their long-term effects. Use of non-pharmacologic pain management techniques has increased in recent years. These methods are easy, inexpensive, and effective in helping newborns recover from painful procedures. Sweet solutions and non-nutritive sucking, breastfeeding, skin-to-skin mother care, swaddling, and facilitated tucking are the most commonly employed and evaluated non-pharmacologic methods. Hospitals should promote and improve parent involvement in pain management. In-service education and well organized hospital teams are crucial for successful implementation of pain protocols in newborns.

Endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ depletion activates XBP1 and controls terminal differentiation in keratinocytes and epidermis

BACKGROUND

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) Ca(2+) depletion, previously shown to signal pathological stress responses, has more recently been found also to trigger homeostatic physiological processes such as differentiation. In keratinocytes and epidermis, terminal differentiation and barrier repair require physiological apoptosis and differentiation, as evidenced by protein synthesis, caspase 14 expression, lipid secretion and stratum corneum (SC) formation.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the role of Ca(2+) depletion-induced ER stress in keratinocyte differentiation and barrier repair in vivo and in cell culture.

METHODS

The SERCA2 Ca(2+) pump inhibitor thapsigargin (TG) was used to deplete ER calcium both in cultured keratinocytes and in mice. Levels of the ER stress factor XBP1, loricrin, caspase 14, lipid synthesis and intracellular Ca(2+) were compared after both TG treatment and barrier abrogation.

RESULTS

We showed that these components of terminal differentiation and barrier repair were signalled by physiological ER stress, via release of stratum granulosum (SG) ER Ca(2+) stores. We first found that keratinocyte and epidermal ER Ca(2+) depletion activated the ER-stress-induced transcription factor XBP1. Next, we demonstrated that external barrier perturbation resulted in both intracellular Ca(2+) emptying and XBP1 activation. Finally, we showed that TG treatment of intact skin did not perturb the permeability barrier, yet stimulated and mimicked the physiological processes of barrier recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

This report is the first to quantify and localize ER Ca(2+) loss after barrier perturbation and show that homeostatic processes that restore barrier function in vivo can be reproduced solely by releasing ER Ca(2+), via induction of physiological ER stress.

Guidelines for procedural pain in the newborn

Despite accumulating evidence that procedural pain experienced by newborn infants may have acute and even long-term detrimental effects on their subsequent behaviour and neurological outcome, pain control and prevention remain controversial issues. Our aim was to develop guidelines based on evidence and clinical practice for preventing and controlling neonatal procedural pain in the light of the evidence-based recommendations contained in the SIGN classification. A panel of expert neonatologists used systematic review, data synthesis and open discussion to reach a consensus on the level of evidence supported by the literature or customs in clinical practice and to describe a global analgesic management, considering pharmacological, non-pharmacological, behavioural and environmental measures for each invasive procedure. There is strong evidence to support some analgesic measures, e.g. sucrose or breast milk for minor invasive procedures, and combinations of drugs for tracheal intubation. Many other pain control measures used during chest tube placement and removal, screening and treatment for ROP, or for postoperative pain, are still based not on evidence, but on good practice or expert opinions.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines should help improving the health care professional's awareness of the need to adequately manage procedural pain in neonates, based on the strongest evidence currently available.

Drugs of choice for sedation and analgesia in the neonatal ICU

Painful procedures in the neonatal ICU are common, undertreated, and lead to adverse consequences. The drugs most commonly used to treat neonatal pain include the opiates, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, ketamine, propofol, acetaminophen, and local and topical anesthetics. This article discusses the indications for and advantages and disadvantages of the commonly used analgesic drugs. Guidance and references for drugs and dosing for specific neonatal procedures are provided.

Drugs of choice for sedation and analgesia in the neonatal ICU

Painful procedures in the neonatal ICU are common, undertreated, and lead to adverse consequences. The drugs most commonly used to treat neonatal pain include the opiates, benzodiazepines, barbiturates, ketamine, propofol, acetaminophen, and local and topical anesthetics. This article discusses the indications for and advantages and disadvantages of the commonly used analgesic drugs. Guidance and references for drugs and dosing for specific neonatal procedures are provided.

Withdrawal symptoms in critically ill children after long-term administration of sedatives and/or analgesics: a first evaluation

OBJECTIVE

To establish frequencies of benzodiazepine and opioid withdrawal symptoms, and correlations with total doses and duration of administration.

DESIGN

A prospective, repeated-measures design.

SETTING

Two pediatric intensive care units in a university children's hospital.

PATIENTS

Seventy-nine children, aged 0 days to 16 yrs, who received intravenous midazolam and/or opioids for >5 days.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Pediatric intensive care unit nurses assessed withdrawal symptoms using the Sophia Benzodiazepine and Opioid Withdrawal Checklist, which includes all withdrawal symptoms (n = 24) described in the pediatric literature. Over 6 months, 2188 observations in 79 children were recorded. Forty-two percent of observations were performed within 24 hrs after tapering off or discontinuation of medication. Symptoms representing overstimulation of the central nervous system, such as anxiety, agitation, grimacing, sleep disturbance, increased muscle tension, and movement disorder, were observed in >10% of observations. Of symptoms reflecting gastrointestinal dysfunction, diarrhea and gastric retention were most frequently observed. Tachypnea, fever, sweating, and hypertension as manifestations of autonomic dysfunction were observed in >13% of observations. The Spearman's rank-correlation coefficient between total doses of midazolam and maximum sum score (of the Sophia Benzodiazepine and Opioid Withdrawal Checklist) was .51 (p < 0.001). The correlation between total doses of opioids and the maximum sum score was .39 (p < 0.01). A significant correlation (.52; p < 0.001) was also found between duration of use and maximum sum score.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to report frequencies of all 24 withdrawal symptoms observed in children after decrease or discontinuation of benzodiazepines and/or opioids. Agitation, anxiety, muscle tension, sleeping <1 hr, diarrhea, fever, sweating, and tachypnea were observed most frequently. Longer duration of use and high dosing are risk factors for development of withdrawal symptoms in children.

Opioids for neonates receiving mechanical ventilation

BACKGROUND

Mechanical ventilation is a potentially painful and discomforting intervention widely used in neonatal intensive care units. Newborn babies (neonates) demonstrate increased sensitivity to pain, which may affect clinical and neurodevelopmental outcomes. The use of drugs that reduce pain might be important in improving survival and neurodevelopmental outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of opioid analgesics (pain-killing drugs derived from opium e.g. morphine), compared to placebo, no drug, or other non-opioid analgesics or sedatives, on pain, duration of mechanical ventilation, mortality, growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes in newborn infants on mechanical ventilation.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches included: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 2, 2007); MEDLINE (1966 to June 2007); EMBASE (1974 to June 2007); and CINAHL (1982 to 2007). Previous reviews and lists of relevant articles were cross-referenced.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing opioids to a control, or to other analgesics or sedatives in newborn infants on mechanical ventilation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted independently by two review authors. Categorical outcomes were analysed using relative risk and risk difference; and continuous outcomes with weighted mean difference or standardised mean difference. A fixed effect model was used for meta-analysis except where heterogeneity existed, in which case a random effects model was used.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirteen studies on 1505 infants were included. Infants given opioids showed reduced premature infant pain profile (PIPP) scores compared to the control group (weighted mean difference -1.71; 95% confidence interval -3.18 to -0.24). Differences in execution and reporting of trials mean that this meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution. Heterogeneity was significantly high in all analyses of pain, even when lower quality studies were excluded and analysis limited to very preterm newborns. Meta-analyses of mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, and long and short-term neurodevelopmental outcomes showed no statistically significant differences. Very preterm infants given morphine took significantly longer to reach full enteral feeding than those in control groups (weighted mean difference 2.10 days; 95% confidence interval 0.35 to 3.85). One study compared morphine with a sedative: the treatments showed similar pain scores, but morphine had fewer adverse effects.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine use of opioids in mechanically ventilated newborns. Opioids should be used selectively, when indicated by clinical judgment and evaluation of pain indicators. If sedation is required, morphine is safer than midazolam. Further research is needed.

Withdrawal symptoms in children after long-term administration of sedatives and/or analgesics: a literature review. "Assessment remains troublesome"

BACKGROUND

Prolonged administration of benzodiazepines and/or opioids to children in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) may induce physiological dependence and withdrawal symptoms.

OBJECTIVE

We reviewed the literature for relevant contributions on the nature of these withdrawal symptoms and on availability of valid scoring systems to assess the extent of symptoms.

METHODS

The databases PubMed, CINAHL, and Psychinfo (1980-June 2006) were searched using relevant key terms.

RESULTS

Symptoms of benzodiazepine and opioid withdrawal can be classified in two groups: central nervous system effects and autonomic dysfunction. However, symptoms of the two types show a large overlap for benzodiazepine and opioid withdrawal. Symptoms of gastrointestinal dysfunction in the PICU population have been described for opioid withdrawal only. Six assessment tools for withdrawal symptoms are used in children. Four of these have been validated for neonates only. Two instruments are available to specifically determine withdrawal symptoms in the PICU: the Sedation Withdrawal Score (SWS) and the Opioid Benzodiazepine Withdrawal Scale (OBWS). The OBWS is the only available assessment tool with prospective validation; however, the sensitivity is low.

CONCLUSIONS

Withdrawal symptoms for benzodiazepines and opioids largely overlap. A sufficiently sensitive instrument for assessing withdrawal symptoms in PICU patients needs to be developed.

A new model of neonatal stress which produces lasting neurobehavioral effects in adult rats

BACKGROUND

During critical care in neonatal intensive care units (NICU), infants experience stressors and treatments that may produce lasting effects on adult health. An animal model simulating the NICU experience is needed to understand the impact of specific neonatal stressors.

OBJECTIVE

We combined approaches to develop a neonatal rat model simulating NICU stressors in order to examine the hypothesis that early stress and morphine sulfate (MS) exposure would affect development and alter adult behavior.

METHODS

Rat pups were exposed to stressors and given twice daily MS injections (2 mg/kg s.c.) for 5 days (postnatal days 3-7). Stress included daily maternal separation (from 08.00 to 16.00 h), hand feedings, a daily hypoxia/hyperoxia episode (100% N(2) for 8 min, then 100% O(2) for 4 min), and cold exposure (4 degrees C for 20 min/day). Five treatment groups were formed: (1) 'control control' (dam reared and untreated); (2) control vehicle; (3) stress vehicle; (4) control morphine, and (5) stress morphine. Early growth and developmental indices were measured. Adult neurobehavioral tests were paw flick, passive avoidance, and forced swimming. Neonatal MS pharmacokinetics, neonatal and adult corticosterone levels, and adult hematocrit and blood pressure values were measured.

RESULTS

Neonatal stress significantly increased the mortality. Neonatal stress and MS treatment slowed early growth. Neonatal MS impaired passive avoidance learning and increased frequency, duration, and distance of forced swimming. There were no differences in corticosterone, hematocrit, or blood pressure values.

CONCLUSIONS

This model simulates NICU stressors and enables measurement of acute physiological and long-term neurobehavioral indices. Neonatal MS treatment impaired the adult cognitive functioning.

Evaluation and development of potentially better practices to improve pain management of neonates

OBJECTIVE

Despite increased knowledge, improved options, and regulatory mandates, pain management of neonates remains inadequate, promoted by the ineffective translation of research data into clinical practice. The Neonatal Intensive Care Quality Improvement Collaborative 2002 was created to provide participating NICUs the tools necessary to translate research, related to prevention and treatment of neonatal pain, into practice. The objective for this study was to use proven quality improvement methods to develop a process to improve neonatal pain management collaboratively.

METHODS

Twelve members of the Neonatal Intensive Care Quality Improvement Collaborative 2002 formed an exploratory group to improve neonatal pain management. The exploratory group established group and site-specific goals and outcome measures for this project. Group members crafted a list of potentially better practices on the basis of the available literature, encouraged implementation of the potentially better practices at individual sites, developed a database for sharing information, and measured baseline outcomes.

RESULTS

The goal "improve the assessment and management of infants experiencing pain in the NICU" was established. In addition, each site within the group identified local goals for improvement in neonatal pain management. Data from 7 categories of neonates (N = 277) were collected within 48 hours of NICU admission to establish baseline data for clinical practices. Ten potentially better practices were developed for prioritized pain conditions, and 61 potentially better practices were newly implemented at the 12 participating sites. Various methods were used for pain assessment at the participating centers. At baseline, heel sticks were used more frequently than peripheral intravenous insertions or venipunctures, with substantial variability in the number of avoidable procedures between centers. Pain was assessed in only 17% of procedures, and analgesic interventions were performed in 19% of the procedures at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Collaborative use of quality improvement methods resulted in the creation of self-directed, efficient, and effective processes to improve neonatal pain management. Group establishment of potentially better practices, collective and site-specific goals, and extensive baseline data resulted in accelerated implementation of clinical practices that would not likely occur outside a collaborative setting.

Pharmacological therapy for analgesia and sedation in the newborn

Rapid advances have been made in the use of pharmacological analgesia and sedation for newborns requiring neonatal intensive care. Practical considerations for the use of systemic analgesics (opioids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, other drugs), local and topical anaesthetics, and sedative or anaesthetic agents (benzodiazepines, barbiturates, other drugs) are summarised using an evidence-based medicine approach, while avoiding mention of the underlying basic physiology or pharmacology. These developments have inspired more humane approaches to neonatal intensive care. Despite these advances, little is known about the clinical effectiveness, immediate toxicity, effects on special patient populations, or long-term effects after neonatal exposure to analgesics or sedatives. The desired or adverse effects of drug combinations, interactions with non-pharmacological interventions or use for specific conditions also remain unknown. Despite the huge gaps in our knowledge, preliminary evidence for the use of neonatal analgesia and sedation is available, but must be combined with a clear definition of clinical goals, continuous physiological monitoring, evaluation of side effects or tolerance, and consideration of long-term clinical outcomes.

Pain assessment and pharmacologic management for infants with NEC: a retrospective chart audit

Purpose: To examine (1) the frequency and types of painful procedures, (2) the frequency and types of analgesic/sedative use, and (3) the frequency of documented pain assessments that infants experience during the five days following a diagnosis of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC).

Design: A retrospective descriptive cohort design.

Sample: Thirty-nine infants from one tertiary care unit diagnosed with stage II NEC.

Main Outcome Variable: Painful procedure data were classified into highly invasive procedures and moderately invasive procedures and were collected for five days following the diagnosis of NEC. Frequency and types of analgesic/sedative administration and frequency of documented pain assessments during each of the five days following the NEC diagnosis were collected.

Results: The average number of painful procedures was 16.3 per day, with documented PIPP scores performed on 30–60 percent of the infants during each of the days following the diagnosis of NEC. At no time were more than two PIPP scores per infant documented in a 24-hour period. Analgesics were used in 52–76 percent of infants during the first three days following the diagnosis of NEC, but use decreased gradually on the fourth and fifth days. No correlation between painful procedures and analgesic/sedative administration on any day was found. Similarly, no correlation between documented PIPP scores and analgesic/sedative use on any day was found.

Pain control: opioid dosing, population kinetics and side-effects

Neonates undergoing invasive procedures, postoperative pain or ventilatory support commonly receive opioids for treating pain and stress. Randomized clinical trials have examined the benefits and adverse effects of morphine or fentanyl for ventilated neonates and other indications. This paper summarizes the current evidence for opioid dosing in newborns, reviews their side-effects and explains the use of population kinetics and non-linear mixed-effects modeling to analyze the data from clinical trials. Opioid use should be reserved for severe pain postoperatively or during intensive care in neonates, using continuous infusions rather than intermittent boluses. The safety and efficacy data from prolonged opioid use, particularly on the long-term outcomes of neonates, is still lacking. The pharmacodynamics and pharmacogenetics of opioid use in infancy needs further investigation, using non-linear mixed-effects models to drive individualized therapy. The current interest in opioid research will reap rich dividends in providing pain relief for neonates and avoiding dangerous side effects.

Prospective sonographic evaluation of fentanyl side effects on the neonatal gallbladder

OBJECTIVE

In an effort to minimise the stress and pain of mechanically ventilated neonates, the application of opioids has increased markedly. Abdominal adverse effects of opioid analgesics are constipation and increased pressure in the biliary system. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of continuous intravenous infusion of fentanyl on the volume of the neonatal gallbladder and to assess potential gastrointestinal side effects.

METHODS

We prospectively matched pairs of 40 mechanically ventilated neonates (28-42 gestational weeks) under total parenteral nutrition and midazolam sedation. One group (20 patients) received continuous fentanyl infusions (dose 0.5-2 microg kg(-1) h(-1)) the other group (20 patients) served as controls. Sonographic measurements of gallbladder length, depth and width were performed to calculate gallbladder volume using the ellipsoid method. Repeated ultrasound images, date of meconium release and serum bilirubin levels were documented.

RESULTS

Fentanyl application was not associated with gallbladder sludge/stones, gallbladder hydrops, hyperbilirubinemia or prolonged meconium release. Neonatal gallbladder length, width and volume did not differ significantly (data expressed as mean, standard deviation, median, interquartile range: length (cm) 3.16+/-0.68, 3.3, 0.675 vs 3.06+/-0.62, 3.3, 1.1; P=0.645; width (cm) 1.02+/-0.23, 1.0, 0.28 vs 0.89+/-0.27, 0.9, 0.38, P=0.12; volume (cm(3)) 1.52+/-0.67, 1.7, 0.86 vs 1.22+/-0.77, 1.09, 1.19, P=0.20).

CONCLUSION

In our study fentanyl caused no major complications in the biliary system and intestine of ventilated preterm and term neonates. Sonographic investigations of the gallbladder under fentanyl treatment may be dispensable. Further investigations are required to assess adverse gastrointestinal effects.

Analgesia and sedation during mechanical ventilation in neonates

BACKGROUND

Endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilation are major components of routine intensive care for very low birth weight newborns and sick full-term newborns. These procedures are associated with physiologic, biochemical, and clinical responses indicating pain and stress in the newborn. Most neonates receive some form of analgesia and sedation during mechanical ventilation, although there are marked variations in clinical practice. Clinical guidelines for pharmacologic analgesia and sedation in newborns based on robust scientific data are lacking, as are measures of clinical efficacy.

OBJECTIVE

This article represents a preliminary attempt to develop a scientific rationale for analgesia sedation in mechanically ventilated newborns based on a systematic analysis of published clinical trials.

METHODS

The current literature was reviewed with regard to the use of opioids (fentanyl, morphine, diamorphine), sedative-hypnotics (midazolam), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (ibuprofen, indomethacin), and acetaminophen in ventilated neonates. Original meta-analyses were conducted that collated the data from randomized clinical comparisons of morphine or fentanyl with placebo, or morphine with fentanyl.

RESULTS

The results of randomized trials comparing fentanyl, morphine, or midazolam with placebo, and fentanyl with morphine were inconclusive because of small sample sizes. Meta-analyses of the randomized controlled trials indicated that morphine and fentanyl can reduce behavioral and physiologic measures of pain and stress in mechanically ventilated preterm neonates but may prolong the duration of ventilation or produce other adverse effects. Randomized trials of midazolam compared with placebo reported significant adverse effects (P < 0.05) and no apparent clinical benefit; the findings of a meta-analysis suggest that there are insufficient data to justify use of IV midazolam for sedation in ventilated neonates.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite ongoing research in this area, huge gaps in our knowledge remain. Well-designed and adequately powered clinical trials are needed to establish the safety, efficacy, and short- and long-term outcomes of analgesia and sedation in the mechanically ventilated newborn.

Summary proceedings from the neonatal pain-control group

Recent advances in neurobiology and clinical medicine have established that the fetus and newborn may experience acute, established, and chronic pain. They respond to such noxious stimuli by a series of complex biochemical, physiologic, and behavioral alterations. Studies have concluded that controlling pain experience is beneficial with respect to short-term and perhaps long-term outcomes. Yet, pain-control measures are adopted infrequently because of unresolved scientific issues and lack of appreciation for the need for control of pain and its long-term sequelae during the critical phases of neurologic maturation in the preterm and term newborn. The neonatal pain-control group, as part of the Newborn Drug Development Initiative (NDDI) Workshop I, addressed these concerns. The specific issues addressed were (1) management of pain associated with invasive procedures, (2) provision of sedation and analgesia during mechanical ventilation, and (3) mitigation of pain and stress responses during and after surgery in the newborn infant. The cross-cutting themes addressed within each category included (1) clinical-trial designs, (2) drug prioritization, (3) ethical constraints, (4) gaps in our knowledge, and (5) future research needs. This article provides a summary of the discussions and deliberations. Full-length articles on procedural pain, sedation and analgesia for ventilated infants, perioperative pain, and study designs for neonatal pain research were published in Clinical Therapeutics (June 2005).

Douleur du nouveau-né : traitement pharmacologique

Pain causes numerous physiological changes in neonates. All invasive procedures induce undesirable stress responses; theses responses can, however, be eliminated or reduced by a judicious use of analgesia. Even though a large number of analgesics and sedatives are currently available, most of them have not been studied in the neonate. At present, a precise understanding of the pharmacological mechanisms of analgesics is difficult because many interactions still remain unknown in the term and premature neonate. This article describes the main analgesics and sedative agents used in the neonate: morphine, fentanyl, sufentanil, alfentanil, nalbuphine, ketamine, midazolam, propofol, acetaminophen, and Emla cream. After a review of the literature regarding these drugs, some practical advices and suggestions for the treatment of procedure-induced pain, and background sedation/analgesia for ventilated neonates are given. It is also stated in this article that the best way to soothe pain in neonates is to combine non pharmacological and pharmacological strategies. At the national level, written guidelines should be prepared in order to improve pain management in the neonate.

State of the science: procedural pain management in the neonate

Neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit experience painful procedures. Over the last 10 years, investigators have examined several pharmacologic and nonpharmacolgic treatment strategies to decrease or eliminate the pain associated with mechanical ventilation, endotrachial intubation, insertion of percutaneous or central venous lines, heel stick, and venipuncture. These procedures and others are addressed as well as the reported severity of pain associated with these procedures. Progress has been made in the past decade to establish evidence-based treatments that will help the clinician more effectively relieve neonatal stress and pain when performing many routine procedures.

Opioids for neonates receiving mechanical ventilation

BACKGROUND

Mechanical ventilation is a potentially painful intervention widely used in neonatal intensive care units. Since newborn babies (neonates) demonstrate increased sensitivity to pain, which may affect clinical and neurodevelopmental outcomes, the use of drugs which reduce pain might be very important.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of opioid analgesics (pain-killing drugs derived from opium e.g. morphine), compared to placebo, no drug, or other non-opioid analgesics or sedatives, on pain, duration of mechanical ventilation, mortality, growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes in newborn infants on mechanical ventilation.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic searches included: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2004); MEDLINE (1966 to June 2004); EMBASE (1974 to June 2004); and CINAHL (1982 to 2003). Previous reviews and lists of relevant articles were cross-referenced.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials or quasi-randomised controlled trials comparing opioids to a control, or to other analgesics or sedatives in newborn infants on mechanical ventilation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data were extracted by two reviewers independently. Categorical outcomes were analysed using relative risk and risk difference; and continuous outcomes with weighted mean difference or standardised mean difference. A fixed effect model was used for meta-analysis except where heterogeneity existed, when a random effects model was used.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirteen studies on 1505 infants were included. Infants given opioids showed reduced premature infant pain profile (PIPP) scores compared to the control group (weighted mean difference -1.71; 95% confidence interval -3.18 to -0.24). Differences in execution and reporting of trials mean that this meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution. Heterogeneity was significantly high in all analyses of pain, even when lower quality studies were excluded and analysis limited to very preterm newborns. Meta-analyses of mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, and long and short term neurodevelopmental outcomes showed no statistically significant differences. Very preterm infants given morphine took significantly longer to reach full enteral feeding than those in control groups (weighted mean difference 2.10 days; 95% confidence interval 0.35 to 3.85). One study compared morphine with a sedative: the treatments showed similar pain scores, but morphine had fewer adverse effects.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is insufficient evidence to recommend routine use of opioids in mechanically ventilated newborns. Opioids should be used selectively, when indicated by clinical judgment and evaluation of pain indicators. If sedation is required, morphine is safer than midazolam. Further research is needed.

[Multicentric study on neonatal medical pain management in the Nord-Pas-de-Calais]

The aim of this study was to describe pain management for newborn infants in neonatal intensive care units and neonatal units in the Nord-Pas-de-Calais.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A questionnaire was distributed to the 52 physicians practising in the six neonatal intensive care units and six neonatal units. The questions were in reference to pain assessment, treatment and prevention.

RESULTS

Forty questionnaires were completed (77%). Eleven units proclaimed an interest in neonatal pain management. The tool for assessing pain was the EDIN scale (Echelle Douleur Inconfort Nouveau-né, neonatal pain and discomfort scale). Analgesic treatment was administered in 100% of cases for the insertion of chest tube, in 92% of cases for the insertion of percutaneous central catheter in a ventilated newborn infant and in 91% of cases for necrotizing enterocolitis requiring a mechanical ventilation. Prescribed analgesic drugs were propacetamol, nalbuphin or fentanyl; a sedation by midazolam or diazepam was occasionally associated. Emla cream was used before lumbar puncture in 80% of cases in the neonatal intensive care units and in 92% of cases in the neonatal units. Three neonatal intensive care units and four neonatal units administered a sucrose solution for blood samples.

CONCLUSION

At the time of study, the interest in the pain of the physicians working in neonatal intensive care units and neonatal units was inadequate to guarantee an optimum management of pain in newborn infants. Physicians' approach remained heterogeneous.

Assessment and management of acute pain in high-risk neonates

Neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit experience hundreds of painful procedures at a time of rapid neurological development. Although the immediate responses to pain may be protective, the potential long-term effects of early and under-treated pain are concerning. As pain assessment is the first step in the provision of appropriate and timely pain management, attention should be directed to the quantification of pain in terms of its location, severity, intensity and duration. Over the past decade, numerous pain measures have been developed for preterm and term neonates, however, most of them have been developed for research purposes and have not been tested in the clinical setting. In order to effectively implement pain measures in the clinical setting, the psychometric properties of reliability, validity, feasibility and clinical utility must be established. This review paper will highlight the importance of neonatal pain assessment and examine the psychometric properties of various measures of neonatal pain. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to manage acute pain in high-risk neonates will be addressed and future research topics will be proposed.

Are postoperative pain instruments useful for specific groups of vulnerable infants?

Based on the authors' review of the literature on pediatric postoperative pain assessment with special attention to groups of vulnerable infants, this article (1) reports on type of surgery and its relationship to postoperative pain intensity; (2) reviews the characteristics of existing postoperative pain instruments for neonates, infants, and toddlers; (3) discusses timing, duration, and who should assess postoperative pain; (4) reviews the specific literature on pain assessment in critically ill infants, including the extremely low birth weight and the cognitively and/or neurologically impaired infant, and (5) discusses the role of parents in postoperative pain assessment. Postoperative pain instruments are useful for specific groups of vulnerable infants, but it is important that in addition to the valuable scoring of pain, common sense is used and factors such as developmental stage, temperament and personality, number of previous painful experiences, anxiety, and environmental factors are taken into account.

Assessment and management of pain and distress in the neonate

Pain management is an integral focus of neonatal care. This article reviews the physiology and impact of neonatal pain and distress and pain assessment tools, as well as clinical interventions and current controversies in the management of pain and distress in neonates. Current guidelines to enhance the recognition and treatment of pain are highlighted.

Effect of multisensory stimulation on analgesia in term neonates: a randomized controlled trial

Many attempts have been made to obtain safe and effective analgesia in newborns. Oral glucose-water has been found to have analgesic properties in neonates. We investigated whether other sensory stimulation added to oral glucose provided more effective analgesia than oral glucose alone. In a randomized prospective double-blind trial, we studied 120 term newborns during heel prick. The babies were divided randomly into six groups of 20, and each group was treated with a different procedure during heel prick: A) control; B) 1 mL 33% oral glucose given 2 min before the heel prick; C) sucking; D) 1 mL 33% oral glucose plus sucking; E) multisensory stimulation including 1 mL 33% oral glucose (sensorial saturation); F) multisensory stimulation without oral glucose. Sensorial saturation consisted in massage, voice, eye contact, and perfume smelling during heel prick. Each heel prick was filmed and assigned a point score according to the Douleur Aiguë du Nouveau-né (DAN) neonatal acute pain scale. Camera recording began 30 s before the heel prick, so it was impossible for the scorers to distinguish procedure A (control) from B (glucose given 2 min before), C (sucking water) from D (sucking glucose), and E (multisensory stimulation and glucose) from F (multisensory stimulation and water) from the video. Procedure E (multisensory stimulation and glucose) was found to be the most effective procedure, and the analgesia was even more effective than that produced by procedure D (sucking glucose). We conclude that sensorial saturation is an effective analgesic technique that potentiates the analgesic effect of oral sugar. It can be used for minor painful procedures on newborns.

An analysis of research and clinical practice in neonatal pain management

PURPOSE

To review the literature on neonatal pain management with a focus on historical misconceptions, ethical issues, barriers to practice, the role of the advanced practice nurse (APN), and suggested improvements.

DATA SOURCES

Selected research and review articles in nursing and medical literature.

CONCLUSIONS

Health care professionals agree that neonates experience pain and in turn deserve effective treatment. Research is controversial regarding the extent of pain management necessary in relation to short-term benefits and long-term consequences. Ethical issues arise when research supporting pain management is not consistently utilized in nursing practice.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Protocols and standardized pain management strategies have demonstrated a beneficial effect on overall patient outcomes. The APN is identified as being in the optimal position to facilitate enhanced neonatal pain management through research, education, and direct clinical care.

Randomised controlled trial of thiopental for intubation in neonates

AIMS

To determine the effects of premedication with thiopental on heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation during semi-elective nasotracheal intubation in neonates.

METHODS

A randomised, placebo controlled, non-blinded study design was used to study 30 neonates (mean birthweight 3.27 kg) requiring semi-elective nasotracheal intubation. The babies were randomly allocated to receive either 6 mg/kg of thiopental (study group) or an equivalent volume of physiological saline (control group) one minute before the start of the procedure. Six infants were intubated primarily and 24 were changed from orotracheal to a nasotracheal tube. The electrocardiogram, arterial pressure wave, and transcutaneous oxygen saturation were recorded continuously 10 minutes before, during, and 20 minutes after intubation. Minute by minute measurements of heart rate, heart rate variability, mean blood pressure (MBP) and transcutaneous oxygen saturation (SpO(2)) were computed. The differences for all of these between the baseline measurements and those made during and after intubation were determined. Differences in the measurements made in the study and the control groups were compared using Student's t test.

RESULTS

During intubation, heart rate increased to a greater degree (12.0 vs -0.5 beats per minute, p < 0.03) and MBP increased to a lesser degree (-2.9 vs 4.4 mm Hg; p < 0.002) in the infants who were premedicated with thiopental. After intubation only the changes in MBP differed significantly between the two groups (-3.8 vs 4.6 mm Hg; p < 0.001). There were no significant changes in the oxygen saturation between the two groups during or after intubation. The time taken for intubation was significantly shorter in the study group (p < 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The heart rate and blood pressure of infants who are premedicated with thiopental are maintained nearer to baseline values than those of similar infants who receive no premedication. Whether this lessening of the acute drop in the heart rate and increase in blood pressure typically seen during intubation of unmedicated infants is associated with long term advantages to the infants remains to be determined.