Leuprolide acetate 22.5 mg 12-week depot formulation in the treatment of patients with advanced prostate cancer

AKR1C3 Converts Castrate and Post-Abiraterone DHEA-S into Testosterone to Stimulate Growth of Prostate Cancer Cells via 5-Androstene-3β,17β-Diol

Androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI) are used to treat castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) to stop a resurgence of androgen receptor (AR) signaling. Despite early success, patients on ARSIs eventually relapse, develop drug resistance, and succumb to the disease. Resistance may occur through intratumoral steroidogenesis mediated by upregulation of aldo-keto reductase family 1C member 3 (AKR1C3). Patients treated with leuprolide (castrate) and those treated with leuprolide plus abiraterone (post-Abi) harbor a reservoir of DHEA-S which could fuel testosterone (T) biosynthesis via AKR1C3 to cause a resurgence of prostate cancer cell growth. We demonstrate that concentrations of DHEA-S found in castrate and post-Abi patients are (i) converted to T in an AKR1C3-dependent manner in prostate cancer cells, and (ii) in amounts sufficient to stimulate AKR1C3-dependent cell growth. We observed this in primary and metastatic prostate cancer cell lines, CWR22PC and DuCaP, respectively. Androgen measurements were made by stable isotope dilution LC-MS/MS. We demonstrate AKR1C3 dependence using stable short hairpin RNA knockdown and pharmacologic inhibitors. We also demonstrate that free DHEA is reduced to 5-androstene-3β,17β-diol (5-Adiol) by AKR1C3 and that this is a major metabolite, suggesting that in our cell lines 5-Adiol is a predominant precursor of T. We have identified a mechanism of ARSI resistance common to both primary and metastatic cell lines that is dependent on the conversion of DHEA to 5-Adiol on route to T catalyzed by AKR1C3.

SIGNIFICANCE

We show that reservoirs of DHEA-S that remain after ARSI treatment are converted into T in primary and metastatic prostate cancer cells in amounts sufficient to stimulate cell growth. Pharmacologic and genetic approaches demonstrate that AKR1C3 is required for these effects. Furthermore, the route to T proceeds through 5-Adiol. We propose that this is a mechanism of ARSI drug resistance.

Long-acting injectable PLGA/PLA depots for leuprolide acetate: successful translation from bench to clinic

The excellent properties of polyesters combined with their ease of synthesis and modification enabled their wide use in the pharmaceutical industry. This has been translated into the approval of several injectable depots for clinical use. Long-acting depots for leuprolide acetate were among the first and most successful examples including Lupron Depot^® and ELIGARD^®. Studying these products is of great interest for researchers in both industry and academia. This will undoubtedly pave the road for the development of new as well as generic long-acting depots for a variety of drugs.

Advances with androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been a treatment of choice for prostate cancer in almost all phases, particularly in the locally advanced, metastatic setting in both hormone-sensitive and castration-resistant diseaseand in those who are unfit for any local therapy. Different ways of administering ADT comes in the form of surgical or chemical castration with the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH-agonists) being the foremost way of delivering ADT.

AREAS COVERED

This review encompasses ADT history, use of leuprolide, degarelix, and relugolix, with contextual use of ADT in combination with androgen-signaling inhibitors and potential mechanisms of resistance. Novel approaches with regard to hormone therapy are also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

The use of GnRH-agonists and GnRH-antagonists yields efficacy that is likely equivalent in resulting in testosterone suppression. While the side-effect profile with ADT are generally equivalent, effects on cardiovascular morbidity may be improved with the use of oral relugolix though this is noted with caution since the cardiovascular side-effects were a result of secondary subgroup analyses. The choice of ADT hinges upon cost, availability, ease of administration, and preference amongst physicians and patients alike.

The role of adrenal derived androgens in castration resistant prostate cancer

Castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) remains androgen dependant despite castrate levels of circulating testosterone following androgen deprivation therapy, the first line of treatment for advanced metstatic prostate cancer. CRPC is characterized by alterations in the expression levels of steroidgenic enzymes that enable the tumour to derive potent androgens from circulating adrenal androgen precursors. Intratumoral androgen biosynthesis leads to the localized production of both canonical androgens such as 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) as well as less well characterized 11-oxygenated androgens, which until recently have been overlooked in the context of CRPC. In this review we discuss the contribution of both canonical and 11-oxygenated androgen precursors to the intratumoral androgen pool in CRPC. We present evidence that CRPC remains androgen dependent and discuss the alterations in steroidogenic enzyme expression and how these affect the various pathways to intratumoral androgen biosynthesis. Finally we summarize the current treatment strategies for targeting adrenal derived androgen biosynthesis.

A 3-(4-nitronaphthen-1-yl) amino-benzoate analog as a bifunctional AKR1C3 inhibitor and AR antagonist: Head to head comparison with other advanced AKR1C3 targeted therapeutics

Drugs used for the treatment of castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) include Abiraterone acetate (Zytiga®) and Enzalutamide (XTANDI®). However, these drugs provide clinical benefit in metastatic disease for only a brief period before drug resistance emerges. One mechanism of drug resistance involves the overexpression of type 5 17-β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (aldo-keto reductase 1C3 or AKR1C3), a major enzyme responsible for the formation of intratumoral androgens that activate the androgen receptor (AR). 3-((4-Nitronaphthalen-1-yl)amino)benzoic acid 1 is a "first-in-class" AKR1C3 competitive inhibitor and AR antagonist. Compound 1 was compared in a battery of in vitro studies with structurally related N-naphthyl-aminobenzoates, and AKR1C3 targeted therapeutics e.g. GTx-560 and ASP9521, as well as with R-bicalutamide, enzalutamide and abiraterone acetate. Compound 1 was the only naphthyl derivative that was a selective AKR1C3 inhibitor and AR antagonist in direct competitive binding assays and in AR driven reporter gene assays. GTx-560 displayed weak activity as a direct AR antagonist but had high potency in the AR reporter gene assay consistent with its ability to inhibit the co-activator function of AKR1C3. By contrast ASP9521 did not act as either an AR antagonist or block AR reporter gene activity. Compound 1 was the only compound that showed comparable potency to inhibit AKR1C3 and act as a direct AR antagonist. Compound 1 blocked the formation of testosterone in LNCaP-AKR1C3 cells, and the expression of PSA driven by the AKR1C3 substrate (4-androstene-3,17-dione) and by an AR agonist, 5α-dihydrotestosterone consistent with its bifunctional role. Compound 1 blocked the nuclear translocation of the AR at similar concentrations to enzalutamide and caused disappearance of the AR from cell lysates. R-biaclutamide and enzalutamide inhibited AKR1C3 at concentrations 200x greater than compound 1, suggesting that its bifunctionality can be explained by a shared pharmacophore that can be optimized.

Outcomes of Inpatient Administration of Restricted Antineoplastic Medications at a Large Academic Medical Institution

BACKGROUND

Restricting oncology and hematology medications to outpatient infusion centers may be considered when infrequent administration is required, a low risk of serious adverse effects exists, or when prompt amelioration of a condition is not expected. At the University of California, San Diego (UCSD), we created a new formulary status for medications designated "formulary, outpatient-restricted use only." This designation could optimize payer reimbursement, as well as improve patient comfort, by negating the need for inpatient admission. When the inpatient administration of a restricted medication is requested at UCSD, there ensues a loosely defined review process involving an informal conversation between the requesting prescriber and the oncology pharmacy and therapeutics (P&T) chair. Patient outcomes associated with this formulary status and informal request process are limited. The purpose of this study is to describe the use of formulary, outpatient-restricted oncology and hematology medications in the inpatient setting at a single-center, academic, and comprehensive cancer center.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted between January 1, 2015 and May 1, 2017. The primary outcome was to determine the percentage of formulary, outpatient-restricted oncology or hematology medications that were administered in the inpatient setting and continued to the outpatient setting. Secondary outcomes included overall survival, hospice enrollment, disease progression status, level of evidence supporting the medication usage, and cost.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients and 24 outpatient-restricted medications met the inclusion criteria. Thirteen (54%) medications were continued upon discharge and eight (33%) were not continued in the outpatient setting. Five of those eight medications were discontinued as a result of patient death.

CONCLUSION

In this single-center study, approximately one-third of the outpatient-restricted medications were not continued upon discharge. The findings suggest that our informal approval process could result in the suboptimal use of formulary outpatient-restricted medications for oncology and hematology indications. A more formalized request process might lead to the more effective utilization of these medications.

Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA)-SO4 Depot and Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA)-SO₄ of adrenal origin is the major C19 steroid in the serum. It is a precursor of intratumoral androgen biosynthesis in patients with advanced prostate cancer following chemical or surgical castration. DHEA is a product of the P450c17 (17α-hydroxylase-17,20-lyase) enzyme. Despite inhibition of P450c17 with new agents, e.g., Abiraterone acetate, Orterenol, and Galeterone, the level of enzyme inhibition rarely exceeds 90% leaving behind a significant depot for androgen biosynthesis within the tumor. For DHEA-SO₄ to be utilized there is uptake by organic anion transporter polypeptides, deconjugation catalyzed by steroid sulfatase, and adaptive upregulation of prostate steroidogenic enzymes that will convert DHEA into either testosterone or dihydrotestosterone. The depot of DHEA-SO₄ that remains after P450c17 inhibition and the adaptive responses that occur within the tumor to promote DHEA utilization contribute to mechanisms of drug resistance observed with P450c17 inhibitors. Knowledge of these mechanisms identify new targets for therapeutics that could be used to surmount drug resistance in prostate cancer.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparison of subcutaneous versus intramuscular leuprolide acetate formulations in male subjects

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of two distinct formulations of leuprolide acetate (LA); subcutaneous (SC) injection and intramuscular (IM) injection.

METHODS

A total of 32 healthy men were randomized to receive a single 7.5 mg injection of SC-LA (n = 16) or IM-LA (n = 16) in this phase I, open-label, parallel-group study. PK was assessed via LA concentrations, and PD via serum luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone (T) concentrations.

RESULTS

The initial surge of LA was higher for IM-LA than SC-LA (Cmax 27 ± 4.9 versus 19 ± 8.0 ng/ml, respectively), with a shorter tmax (1.0 ± 0.4 versus 2.1 ± 0.8 h). The duration of quantifiable LA concentration was longer for SC-LA (up to 56 versus 42 days for SC-LA and IM-LA, respectively). Median LH concentrations in both groups rapidly increased, followed by gradual decrease. However, SC-LA demonstrated a longer duration of LH suppression, with median levels remaining below 1.0 IU/l through Day 56 compared with IM-LA where LH started to rise by Day 35. Consequently, serum T began to increase by Day 42 in the IM-LA group, with only four subjects maintaining levels ⩽50 ng/dl, compared with 14 subjects in the SC-LA group. By Day 56, 13 SC-LA subjects maintained serum T levels ⩽50 ng/dl. Both SC-LA and IM-LA were well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Both formulations demonstrated consistent delivery of drug over 1 month; however, SC-LA provided a longer duration of action than expected based on the dosing interval. This profile suggests that SC-LA will provide effective suppression of T over a longer period of time, permitting greater injection scheduling flexibility.

Estradiol for the mitigation of adverse effects of androgen deprivation therapy

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in men. Conventional endocrine treatment for PCa leads to global sex steroid deprivation. The ensuing severe hypogonadism is associated with well-documented adverse effects. Recently, it has become apparent that many of the biological actions attributed to androgens in men are in fact not direct, but mediated by estradiol. Available evidence supports a primary role for estradiol in vasomotor stability, skeletal maturation and maintenance, and prevention of fat accumulation. Hence there has been interest in revisiting estradiol as a treatment for PCa. Potential roles for estradiol could be in lieu of conventional androgen deprivation therapy or as low-dose add-back treatment while continuing androgen deprivation therapy. These strategies may limit some of the side effects associated with conventional androgen deprivation therapy. However, although available data are reassuring, the potential for cardiovascular risk and pro-carcinogenic effects on PCa via estrogen receptor signalling must be considered.

Risk of Testosterone Flare in the Era of the Saturation Model: One More Historical Myth

CONTEXT

When luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists were introduced in the 1980s, it was universally believed that the initial transient rise in serum testosterone (T), termed T flare, caused rapid prostate cancer (PCa) growth and led to disease progression, complications, and death. It became routine to offer antiandrogens (AAs) to prevent these risks. However, over the last decade, it has become recognized that androgens have a finite ability to stimulate PCa growth (the saturation model), providing a theoretical challenge to the risks of T flare.

OBJECTIVE

To review evidence for the risks associated with T flare from a modern perspective, specifically prostate-specific antigen (PSA) flare, disease progression, and spinal cord compression.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

An Ovid Medline database search was conducted to identify articles related to "testosterone flare", "disease flare", and "PSA flare" associated with LHRH agonists. The literature review included papers published from May 1, 1980 through May 1, 2016. Key search terms included, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone, gonadotropin-releasing hormone, and antiandrogens.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Initial administration of LHRH agonists uniformly results in peak increases in serum T by 40-100% on days 2-3, returning to baseline by days 7-8, after which T declines to castrate levels by approximately 2-3 wk. Of six LHRH agonist studies reporting PSA during the period of T flare, five showed no significant rise in PSA despite the presence of advanced disease with mean baseline PSA as high as ≥500ng/ml. Evidence for disease flare was limited to one report of greater bone pain with LHRH agonists alone versus LHRH agonists with AAs. Three other RCTs reported no disease flare. Rates of spinal cord compression were no greater for LHRH agonists alone compared with castration or estrogen treatment. We identified no studies of men treated with LHRH agonists versus placebo/no treatment to assess the effects of LHRH agonists compared with the natural history of advanced PCa.

CONCLUSIONS

Although T flare has been considered risky for 30 yr, a modern review of the evidence collected primarily in the 1980s and 1990s fails to support this view. Specifically, T flare does not appear to be associated with significantly increased PSA, disease progression, or adverse events, even in men with widely metastatic disease. These results are consistent with the saturation model, first introduced in 2006. There seems little value in adding AA to LHRH agonists, except possibly for men with extensive vertebral metastases and serum T concentrations well below the saturation point of approximately 250ng/dl (8.7nmol/l).

PATIENT SUMMARY

A review of the literature reveals no evidence for increased risks associated with testosterone flare from the initiation of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists. This appears to be an unsupported belief from an earlier era when our understanding of testosterone's relationship to prostate cancer was less sophisticated. Except in rare instances, there appears to be no need to use an androgen blocker when beginning treatment with LHRH agonists.

Extended release, 6-month formulations of leuprolide acetate for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer: achieving testosterone levels below 20 ng/dl

INTRODUCTION

Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists such as leuprolide acetate (LA) are the most frequently utilized treatment of advanced prostate cancer as the regimen for achieving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). The efficacy of LA is determined by extent of testosterone (T) suppression in prostate cancer patients. Although, the historical castrate T suppression target has been defined as < 50 ng/dl, this level may not be as low as required to deliver equivalent suppression as achieved by surgical castration. Recent studies have demonstrated that a T level as low as 20 ng/dl may produce improved clinical outcomes.

AREAS COVERED

LA is available in long-acting formulations that deliver active drug over the course of 1-6 months from a single-dose administration. The technologies utilized to provide sustained drug delivery differ: one mode of administration uses microspheres, which encapsulate the drug and are injected as a suspension intramuscularly; another mode of administration uses a liquid polymer that creates a single, solid depot after injection subcutaneously. This article will review the safety and efficacy of both 6-month LA formulations, as well as their impact in prostate cancer treatment.

EXPERT OPINION

As the understanding of optimal T castrate level evolves and may be refined pending new data from contemporaneous trials, achievement and maintenance of T levels well below 50 ng/dl may be important in evaluating potential differences in ADT regimens.

Luteinizing hormone as a key player in the cognitive decline of Alzheimer's disease

This article is part of a Special Issue "SBN 2014". Alzheimer's disease is one of the most prevalent and costly neurological diseases in the world. Although decades of research have focused on understanding Alzheimer's disease pathology and progression, there is still a great lack of clinical treatments for those who suffer from it. One of the factors most commonly associated with the onset of Alzheimer's disease is a decrease in levels of gonadal hormones, such as estrogens and androgens. Despite the correlational and experimental data which support the role of these hormones in the etiology of Alzheimer's disease, clinical trials involving their reintroduction through hormone therapy have had varied results and these gonadal hormones often have accompanying health risks. More recently, investigation has turned toward other hormones in the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis that are disrupted by age-related decreases in gonadal hormones. Specifically, luteinizing hormone, which is increased with age in both men and women (in response to removal of negative feedback), has surfaced as a potentially powerful player in the risk and onset of Alzheimer's disease. Mounting evidence in basic research and epidemiological studies supports the role of elevated luteinizing hormone in exacerbating age-related cognitive decline in both males and females. This review summarizes the recent developments involving luteinizing hormone in increasing the cognitive deficits and molecular pathology characteristic of Alzheimer's disease.

Mechanisms of drug resistance that target the androgen axis in castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC)

Castrate resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is the fatal-form of prostate cancer and remains androgen dependent. The reactivation of the androgen axis occurs due to adaptive intratumoral androgen biosynthesis which can be driven by adrenal androgens and/or by changes in the androgen receptor (AR) including AR gene amplification. These mechanisms are targeted with P450c17 inhibitors e.g., abiraterone acetate and AR super-antagonists e.g., enzalutamide, respectively. Clinical experience indicates that with either agent an initial response is followed by drug resistance and the patient clinically progresses on these agents. This article reviews the mechanisms of intrinsic and acquired drug resistance that target the androgen axis and how this might be surmounted.

Androgen biosynthesis in castration-resistant prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of death in adult males in the USA. Recent advances have revealed that the fatal form of this cancer, known as castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), remains hormonally driven despite castrate levels of circulating androgens. CRPC arises as the tumor undergoes adaptation to low levels of androgens by either synthesizing its own androgens (intratumoral androgens) or altering the androgen receptor (AR). This article reviews the major routes to testosterone and dihydrotestosterone synthesis in CRPC cells and examines the enzyme targets and progress in the development of isoform-specific inhibitors that could block intratumoral androgen biosynthesis. Because redundancy exists in these pathways, it is likely that inhibition of a single pathway will lead to upregulation of another so that drug resistance would be anticipated. Drugs that target multiple pathways or bifunctional agents that block intratumoral androgen biosynthesis and antagonize the AR offer the most promise. Optimal use of enzyme inhibitors or AR antagonists to ensure maximal benefits to CRPC patients will also require application of precision molecular medicine to determine whether a tumor in a particular patient will be responsive to these treatments either alone or in combination.

Maximal testosterone suppression in prostate cancer--free vs total testosterone

Testosterone remains a key target in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. The relationship of free testosterone to prostate cancer treatment and outcomes remains largely unexplored. A consensus of prostate cancer experts was convened in 2013 to review current knowledge surrounding relationship of total and free testosterone to prostate cancer, discuss the free hormone hypothesis, and highlight future avenues for therapeutics. Free testosterone may better reflect prostate cancer tissue androgen levels than serum total testosterone concentration. Free testosterone deserves more research regarding its relation to clinical outcomes.

Six-month leuprorelin acetate depot formulations in advanced prostate cancer: a clinical evaluation

For nearly three decades, gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists, particularly leuprorelin acetate (LA), have served as an important part of the treatment armamentarium for prostate cancer. The introduction of LA depot formulations provided a significant improvement in the acceptance of this therapy; however, their indicated treatment duration of 1 to 4 months was still not long enough to satisfy all medical needs. For this reason some manufacturers developed new injectable formulations that provide testosterone suppression for 6 months. This review article assesses key publications in order to compare these long-acting, commercially available, LA depot formulations and their clinical performance. The literature search identified 14 publications; by excluding reviews, duplications, and non-English articles, only three original papers describing clinical trial remained for review: two focused on microsphere-based LA formulations with either a 30 mg or 45 mg dose and one focused on a gel-based leuprorelin acetate with a 45 mg dose. All products were tested in individual clinical trials and have demonstrated their efficacy and safety.

A nanoparticle depot formulation of 4-(N)-stearoyl gemcitabine shows a strong anti-tumour activity

OBJECTIVES

Depot formulation as a carrier for cytotoxic chemotherapeutic drugs is not well studied. The objective of this study is to test the feasibility of using a subcutaneous depot formulation to administer a cytotoxic anti-cancer drug for systemic therapy.

METHODS

A fatty-acid amide prodrug of the nucleoside analogue gemcitabine (4-(N)-stearoyl gemcitabine (GemC18)) was incorporated into poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles or microspheres. A GemC18 solution was used as a control. The anti-tumour activity was evaluated after subcutaneous injection of the different formulations in C57BL/6 mice with pre-established model tumours. The clearance of GemC18 from the injection site was determined by measuring the percentage of GemC18 remaining at the injection site at different times after the injection.

KEY FINDINGS

The depot formulation based on the GemC18-loaded PLGA nanoparticles showed the strongest anti-tumour effect, likely due to the proper 'release' of GemC18 from the injection site.

CONCLUSIONS

It is feasible to dose cytotoxic anti-cancer drugs as a nanoparticle-based depot formulation, especially when combined with an advanced prodrug strategy.

Variations of serum testosterone levels in prostate cancer patients under LH-releasing hormone therapy: an open question

The hypothesis 'the lower the better when achieving castration levels of testosterone' is based on the data from second-line hormonal manipulation and its molecular basis, and on better oncological results reported for lower castration levels in prostate cancer (PCa) patients, including those achieved with maximal androgen blockade. In this regard, the equivalence of surgical and different pharmacological castrations has been controversial. The modified amino acid structure that makes LH-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogs more potent than LHRH, and the method of delivering the analogs impacts on bioavailibility and potentially causes differences in androgen levels and in its final oncological efficacy. In addition to this, there is a myriad of circumstances, such as those related to ethnic variations and co-morbidities, which uniquely impact on the pharmacological approach in a highly heterogeneous population of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients. Ineffective testosterone suppression through hormonal escape is currently poorly recognized and may result in increased PCa mortality. Until now, the optimal serum testosterone level in patients under castration, and the impact of its variations in patients under LHRH therapy, remain open questions and have been merged to a broad spectra of patients who are highly heterogeneous. This heterogeneity relates to a number of mechanisms regarding response to treatment, which influences the biology of the relapsing tumor and the sensitivity to subsequent therapies in the individual patient. The rationale to achieve testosterone levels below 20-50 ng/dl warrant further investigation as these levels have recently rescued CRPC patients. In the last few years and months, important advancements in prostate cancer treatment have been achieved. Nevertheless, these advances are measured in a few months of additional survival and under high costs, not available to most of the world population, compared with the benefits of hormonal manipulation that are measured in years, there is a huge potential for accessible and durable effect expansion and optimization of treatment, particularly with the current tendency of a more individual approach.

Testosterone in prostate cancer: the Bethesda consensus

OBJECTIVE

• Androgen stimulation of prostate cancer (PCa) cells has been extensively studied. The increasing trend of using serum testosterone as an absolute surrogate for castration state means that the diagnostic measurement of testosterone and the values potentially influencing prognosis must be better understood. This is especially important when PCa progresses from an endocrine to an intracrine status.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

• We performed a literature review using the MEDLINE database for publications on: (i) hormonal changes with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT); (ii) monitoring hormonal therapy with testosterone measurement; (iii) the efficacy of intermittent androgen deprivation (IAD) compared with continuous androgen deprivation; (iv) the underlying mechanisms of castration-resistance; and (v) novel treatments for castration-resistant PCa (CRPCa).

RESULTS

• The optimum serum castration levels to be achieved with ADT are still debated. Recently, the 50 ng/dL threshold has been questioned because of reports indicating worse outcomes when levels between 20 and 50 ng/dL were studied. Instead, a 20 ng/dL threshold for serum testosterone after ADT in patients with advanced prostate cancer was recommended.

CONCLUSION

• Understanding the mechanisms of androgen biosynthesis relating to PCa as well as prognostic implications might achieve a consensus regarding the role of ADT for both the androgen-sensitive and -insensitive disease state.

Black men have lower rates than white men of biochemical failure with primary androgen-deprivation therapy

INTRODUCTION

Black men have a higher incidence of advanced stage at diagnosis and mortality from prostate cancer than do men in other racial groups. Given that androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) is one of the mainstays of treatment for advanced prostate cancer, we investigated the development of biochemical failure, or recurrence of elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, among different races in men receiving ADT.

METHODS

Patients with prostate cancer who received ADT in the Kaiser Permanente Southern California Cancer Registry between January 2003 and December 2006 were eligible for inclusion in our study. Patients who had prior treatment for their cancer with surgery or radiation were excluded. Treatment failure was defined as an increase in PSA of >2 ng/mL from PSA nadir, with no subsequent decrease in PSA. We compared the biochemical failure rate in white patients to those in black, Hispanic, and Asian/other patients. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to estimate hazards ratios.

RESULTS

Our study population consisted of 681 patients: 416 (61%) were white; 107 (16%) were black; 107 (16%) were Hispanic; and 51 (7%) were Asian or another race. After we controlled for all demographic variables and for variables related to prostate cancer, blacks were the only group with a lower risk of treatment failure compared with whites. The hazard ratios for treatment failure were as follows: black versus white, 0.66 (p = 0.03); Hispanic versus white, 1.00 (p = 0.8); Asian/other race versus white, 1.5 (p = 0.1). In this multivariate analysis, pretreatment PSA level and cancer stage were the only other variables associated with a higher risk of treatment failure.

CONCLUSION

Among patients receiving ADT as primary monotherapy for prostate cancer, blacks may have a lower rate of biochemical failure compared with whites. Although the etiology of this finding is unclear, it suggests the possibility that prostate cancer in black men may be more androgen sensitive than it is in white men.

Six-month gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist depots provide efficacy, safety, convenience, and comfort

Two different 6-month GnRH agonist depot formulations approved for palliative treatment of advanced and metastatic prostate cancer in the United States - leuprolide acetate 45 mg and triptorelin pamoate 22.5 mg - provide patients with efficacy and safety comparable to those of existing 1-, 3-, and 4-month GnRH agonist depots. However, the 6-month formulations can increase patient convenience, comfort, and compliance by reducing the number of physician visits and injections required. At the conclusion of their pivotal trials, the 6-month formulations demonstrated efficacy rates in achieving chemical castration (serum testosterone ≤50 ng/dL) that ranged between 93% and 99%. As with existing GnRH agonist depot formulations, hot flashes represented the most common adverse event reported in trials of 6-month leuprolide acetate or triptorelin. As such, these products may prove useful not only for their labeled indication, but also as adjuncts to other treatments such as radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. We recommend further research, including head-to-head trials between the 6-month GnRH depots, to refine our understanding of these products.

Individual variations of serum testosterone in patients with prostate cancer receiving androgen deprivation therapy

OBJECTIVE

To analyse individual variations in serum testosterone level, the cumulative rate of 'breakthrough' increases over castrate levels, and to evaluate whether the increases can be predicted.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Serum testosterone levels were determined every 6 months over 3 years in 73 consecutive patients with prostate cancer who were medically castrated, prospectively enrolled in a single tertiary academic centre. Patients recruited for this study were being treated with a 3-monthly depot of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist over 6-48 months. Serum testosterone was measured using a chemiluminescent assay with a lower sensitivity level of 15 ng/dL and interassay coefficient of variation of 25% at low testosterone concentrations.

RESULTS

Individual variations could not be explained by the interassay variation coefficient in 26% of the patients. The rate of breakthrough increases >50 ng/dL increased from 12.3% at the first determination to 24.7% at the third, then remaining stable. The rate of breakthrough increases of 20-50 ng/dL increased from 27.4% at the first determination to 31.5% at the second, and then remained stable. A first determination of <20 ng/dL provided an 11.4% probability for future increases of >50 ng/dL, with a 5.7% probability if two consecutive determinations were <20 ng/dL and a null probability when three consecutive determinations were <20 ng/dL.

CONCLUSIONS

Individual variations in serum testosterone level cannot be explained by the coefficient of variation of the assay in a quarter of patients who are medically castrated. Breakthrough increases over castrate levels increase over time and those of >50 ng/dL can be predicted from the previous levels.

Testosterone recovery after prolonged androgen suppression in patients with prostate cancer

PURPOSE

We prospectively examined the extent and timing of testosterone recovery in patients with prostate cancer treated with 2 years of androgen suppression.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 153 patients with pT3N0M0 prostate cancer or positive margins after radical prostatectomy, or with prostate specific antigen relapse were treated with radiation to the prostate bed plus 2 years of androgen suppression as per a phase II study. Androgen suppression consisted of nilutamide for 4 weeks plus busereline acetate bimonthly for 2 years. Serum testosterone was measured at baseline, every 4 months during androgen suppression and every 6 months after androgen suppression during followup. Testosterone recovery to supracastrate levels, and to baseline and/or normal levels was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Prognostic factors for testosterone recovery were examined.

RESULTS

A total of 121 patients who completed 2 years of androgen suppression and 20 patients who received shorter durations of androgen suppression (median 16 months) were available for testosterone recovery analysis. Median followup after finishing androgen suppression was 38.9 months. All patients achieved castrate levels on androgen suppression. At 36 months after completion of androgen suppression 93.2% and 71.5% had recovery to supracastrate (median time 12.7 months), and to baseline and/or normal testosterone levels (median time 22.3 months), respectively. On multivariate analysis younger age (younger than 60 years, p = 0.0006) and shorter androgen suppression duration (less than 2 years, p = 0.028) were prognostic for faster recovery to baseline and/or normal testosterone levels after adjusting for baseline testosterone levels (p = 0.447).

CONCLUSIONS

Testosterone recovery after prolonged androgen suppression is protracted. Older age and longer duration of androgen suppression result in significantly longer recovery times to baseline and/or normal testosterone levels.

Redefining clinically significant castration levels in patients with prostate cancer receiving continuous androgen deprivation therapy

PURPOSE

We determined the testosterone castration level with clinical relevance in patients with prostate cancer on continuous androgen deprivation therapy. Secondary objectives were to analyze the role of associated bicalutamide in breakthrough increases of serum testosterone in these patients and the possible benefit of maximal androgen blockade.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Serum testosterone was determined 3 times (in 6 months) in 73 patients with nonmetastatic prostate cancer treated with medical castration, 28 (38.4%) of whom also received bicalutamide (maximal androgen blockade). During a mean followup of 51 months (range 12 to 240) 41 (67.1%) events of androgen independent progression were identified, and correlated with breakthrough testosterone increases of 50 ng/dl (classic level) and 20 ng/dl (surgical castration level).

RESULTS

Testosterone was less than 20 ng/dl in all determinations in 32 patients (43.6%). Breakthrough increases between 20 and 50 ng/dl were observed in 23 patients (31.5%), and increases greater than 50 ng/dl were observed in the remaining 18 (24.7%). The lowest testosterone level with a significant impact on survival free of androgen independent progression was 32 ng/dl. Mean survival free of androgen independent progression in patients with breakthrough increases greater than 32 ng/dl was 88 months (95% CI 55-121) while it was 137 months (95% CI 104-170) in those without breakthrough increases (p <0.03). Patients on maximal androgen blockade had an incidence of testosterone increase similar to those receiving monotherapy. However, maximal androgen blockade provided a significantly longer survival free of androgen independent progression in those with breakthrough increases greater than 50 ng/dl.

CONCLUSIONS

In the current report the lowest testosterone castration level with clinical relevance in medically castrated patients with prostate cancer was 32 ng/dl. Breakthrough increases greater than this threshold predicted a lower survival free of androgen independent progression. Maximal androgen blockade might benefit medically castrated cases of prostate cancer with breakthrough increases of more than 50 ng/dl.

Determining dosing intervals for luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonists based on serum testosterone levels: a prospective study

PURPOSE

Long acting luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonists are the predominant form of androgen suppression in the treatment of prostate cancer with the goal of maintaining castrate levels of testosterone. Current dosing of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonists does not include monitoring the end organ response of serum testosterone. Recent evidence suggests standard dosing regimens fail to achieve castrate levels of testosterone in some patients while in other patients testosterone can remain at castrate levels longer than the manufacturer recommended dosing interval. We prospectively evaluated patients with prostate cancer receiving luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonist hormonal therapy to determine the length of time that serum testosterone remains at or below castrate levels.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A 3-month dose of 22.5 mg leuprolide was administered to all patients as a first dose followed by a second dose 3 months later. Serum testosterone and prostate specific antigen were measured prospectively before starting hormonal therapy, after the first dose (12 weeks) and again following the second dose (24 weeks) to assess if castrate levels of testosterone (50 ng/dl or less) had been reached. At 24 weeks if patient serum testosterone was 50 ng/dl or less, then 22.5 mg leuprolide were not administered, and serum testosterone and prostate specific antigen were checked monthly. When serum testosterone was greater than 50 ng/dl a subsequent dose of 22.5 mg leuprolide was given. Serum testosterone and prostate specific antigen were then checked 3 months later and monthly thereafter until testosterone was greater than 50 ng/dl. Thus, the time that testosterone remained at castrate levels could be accurately established.

RESULTS

From February 2003 to August 2005, 42 patients were treated in this manner with a median followup of 18 months (range 10 to 30). Average patient age was 77 years. Median Gleason grade was 7 (range 6 to 9). Median pretreatment prostate specific antigen was 15.1 ng/ml (range 0.6 to 433) and median posttreatment prostate specific antigen was 0.74 (less than 0.1 to 120). The median dosing interval was 6 months (range 5 to 12). Three patients had an increase in prostate specific antigen while receiving treatment despite castrate levels of testosterone. No patient required more frequent dosing than every 5 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Testosterone based luteinizing hormone releasing hormone agonist therapy makes empirical sense. It represents continuous androgen ablation based on the patient physiological end point, namely testosterone. Early data suggest that using serum testosterone to guide luteinizing hormone releasing hormone dosing is safe, efficacious and cost-effective. By following end organ response, patients receive individualized care and more accurate androgen suppression therapy.

Failure to Maintain a Suppressed Level of Serum Testosterone during Long-Acting Depot Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Agonist Therapy in Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer

OBJECTIVES

It was the aim of this study to analyze the failure rates in achieving or maintaining castrate levels of serum testosterone in patients with advanced prostate cancer treated with the 3-month luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist (LH-RH) therapy.

METHODS

Total serum testosterone was determined in 234 patients with prostate cancer in a cross-sectional study. A subset of 90 patients submitted to radical prostatectomy was used as the control group (group 1), and 144 patients with advanced prostate cancer under androgen suppression therapy were included in the study group (groups 2 and 3). The study group was divided into 93 patients (group 2) treated with 50 mg daily bicalutamide and LH-RH agonist (maximal androgen blockade, MAB) and 51 patients treated with the LH-RH agonist alone (group 3). Median follow-up after androgen suppression was 42 months. The castrate testosterone level was defined below 50 ng/dl.

RESULTS

The mean serum testosterone level was 29.1 ng/dl in patients undergoing MAB (group 2) and 29.5 ng/dl in patients treated with the LH-RH agonist (group 3; p > 0.05). In group 1, the mean serum testosterone was 445.2 ng/dl (p < 0.0001). The rate of patients with a serum testosterone level higher than 50 ng/dl was 10.9% in patients undergoing androgen suppression, 10% in patients with MAB treatment and 12.5% in those with LH-RH agonist therapy (p > 0.05). In group 1, 98.9% of the patients had a serum testosterone level higher than 50 ng/dl.

CONCLUSIONS

A small but clinically significant rate of patients under 3-month LH-RH agonist therapy fail to achieve or maintain castrate testosterone serum levels. This finding supports the need of monitoring testicular response during LH-RH agonist therapy.

A 12-month clinical study of LA-2585 (45.0 mg): a new 6-month subcutaneous delivery system for leuprolide acetate for the treatment of prostate cancer

PURPOSE

The safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of LA-2585, a new 6-month subcutaneous depot of leuprolide acetate (Atrix Laboratories, Fort Collins, Colorado) were investigated in patients with prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this 12-month, open label, multicenter study 111 patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate were administered 45.0 mg LA-2585 subcutaneously once every 6 months. The primary efficacy parameter was serum testosterone 50 ng/dl or less. Leuprolide acetate pharmacokinetics were analyzed in a subset of 28 patients.

RESULTS

Of the 111 enrolled patients 103 (93%) completed the 12-month study. Eight patients withdrew due to nonmedical reasons in 1, disease progression in 5 and cardiovascular disease in 2. By day 28, 108 of the 109 remaining patients (99%) achieved testosterone suppression, while 1 who never attained suppression was withdrawn at day 85. Mean time to castrate suppression was 21.2 days (median 21). At study completion 102 of 103 patients (99%) were below medical castrate testosterone levels of 50 ng/dl (mean +/- SE 12.3 +/- 2.1 ng/dl) with 91 of 103 (88%) at less than 20 ng/dl. Mean luteinizing hormone decreased from 6.98 +/- 0.48 mIU/ml at baseline to 0.23 +/- 0.14 mIU/ml at month 12. Luteinizing hormone was consistently below 1 mIU/ml. Mean prostate specific antigen decreased 97% from 39.8 +/- 21.5 ng/ml at baseline to 1.2 +/- 0.3 ng/ml at 12 months. No clinically significant flare reactions were observed. The most common treatment related adverse event was mild to moderate hot flashes.

CONCLUSIONS

LA-2585 (45.0 mg depot) consistently produced and maintained safe and effective serum testosterone suppression with total serum testosterone well below the medical castrate level of less than 50 ng/dl.

The effect of 6 months of androgen deprivation therapy on muscle and fat mass in older men with localized prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate body composition changes, specifically skeletal muscle mass, in men receiving androgen deprivation with luteinizing-hormone releasing hormone-agonist (LHRH-A) for prostate cancer (PCa) in comparison with healthy controls.

DESIGN

Retrospective analysis of body composition changes in men with prostate cancer receiving LHRH-A therapy from 2 clinical trials compared to men without prostate cancer serving as a placebo-control in another clinical trial.

SETTING

Clinical Research Center in Connecticut.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty men (> 60 years) receiving 6 months of LHRH-A therapy for PCa were compared to a healthy group of 25 men without PCa.

MEASUREMENTS

Appendicular skeletal muscle/height2 (ASM/ht2), lean and fat mass were assessed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry. Total testosterone levels were assessed by enzyme immunoassay.

RESULTS

At baseline, 12/30 (40%) of the treatment group and 7/25 (28%) of the control group (p = 0.11) met criteria for sarcopenia. There were no differences between control groups in ASM/ht2 or lean mass. The LHRH-A group had a higher percent body fat than the control group, 29.8 +/- 6.3 versus 26.3 +/- 4.6 (p = 0.02). ASM/ht2 and lean mass decreased in the LHRH-A group from 7.5 +/- 0.9 kg to 7.3 +/- 0.9 kg (-2.3% +/- 0.03; p < or = 0.001) and 53.5 +/- 5.4 kg to 52.3 +/- 5.3 kg (-2.1% +/- 0.03; p < or = 0.001), respectively. There was no muscle loss in the control group. At 6 months, the LHRH-A group had increased percent body fat from 29.8 +/- 6.4 to 32.2 +/- 5.8 (9.5% +/- 0.13; p < or = 0.001), whereas the control group had decreased in percent body fat from 26.6 +/- 4.6 to 25.3 +/- 5.0 (-3.8% +/- 0.08; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Men undergoing LHRH-A treatment for PCa decreased appendicular skeletal muscle and lean tissue and increased body fat within 6 months of initiation of therapy. Lifestyle changes or medical interventions to minimize the effects of androgen deprivation therapy for PCa deserve investigation.

Similar frequency of testosterone surge after repeat injections of goserelin (Zoladex) 3.6 mg and 10.8 mg: Results of a randomized open-label trial

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether testosterone surges occur on repeat injections of 3.6 or 10.8 mg goserelin (Zoladex) depot and, if so, their extent.

METHODS

Men with prostate cancer for whom hormonal therapy was indicated were randomized to open-label goserelin 3.6 mg every 28 days (n = 129) or 10.8 mg every 84 days (n = 118) for 48 weeks. Serum testosterone and luteinizing hormone levels were measured before repeat injection on day 1 of each treatment cycle and then on days 4 and 8. Surges were defined in three ways: type 1, simultaneous increase in both testosterone and luteinizing hormone to within the age-specific normal range; type 2, increase in testosterone to within the age-specific normal range; and type 3, elevation in testosterone from less than to greater than the castrate level (greater than 18.5 ng/dL).

RESULTS

Most patients did not experience a testosterone surge. Two patients (1.8%) in the 10.8-mg group had a type 1 surge after one repeat injection and two (1.6%) in the 3.6-mg group had a type 2 surge after one repeat injection. Type 3 surges occurred after one or more repeat injections in 34 (27.0%) and 20 (17.7%) patients in the 3.6-mg and 10.8-mg groups, respectively (P = 0.065); the mean surge (+/- standard deviation) was 11.2 ng/dL (+/-13.5) and 17.3 ng/dL (+/-24.6), respectively. No patient with a testosterone surge had clinical symptoms of a tumor flare reaction.

CONCLUSIONS

The testosterone levels were consistently maintained within the castrate range (18.5 ng/dL or less) in most (77.4%) patients receiving long-term 3.6 mg or 10.8 mg goserelin.

3-month formulation of goserelin acetate ('Zoladex' 10.8-mg depot) in advanced prostate cancer: results from an Italian, open, multicenter trial

OBJECTIVES

To determine the endocrine effects, efficacy and tolerability of the 3-month formulation of goserelin acetate ('Zoladex' 10.8-mg depot; 'Zoladex' is a trade mark of the AstraZeneca group of companies) in the treatment of patients with advanced prostate cancer.

METHODS

Between February 1996 and October 1997, this open, multicentre study enrolled 120 patients with locally advanced (T3/4) or metastatic (N+ or M1) disease, or an increase in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level after radical prostatectomy. Patients received goserelin acetate 10.8-mg depot every 12 weeks until clinical progression or interruption for adverse events or other reasons.

RESULTS

The mean testosterone concentrations were suppressed to the castration range (< or =2 nmol/l) after 4 weeks of treatment and remained suppressed throughout the study. In total, 99/115 (86%) patients had a serum PSA response, and the mean PSA value decreased significantly during treatment (p = 0.006). The mean PSA level at baseline was significantly lower in patients without disease progression compared to those who experienced disease progression (p = 0.0002). Goserelin acetate 10.8-mg depot was well tolerated and there were no injection site reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

The goserelin acetate 10.8-mg depot is well tolerated with no injection site reactions. It produces PSA responses and provides reliable suppression of serum testosterone.

An eight-month clinical study of LA-2575 30.0 mg: a new 4-month, subcutaneous delivery system for leuprolide acetate in the treatment of prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of a new 4-month subcutaneous depot of leuprolide acetate in patients with prostate cancer.

METHODS

Ninety patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the prostate were enrolled in an open-label, multicenter study. LA-2575 30.0 mg was administered subcutaneously once every 4 months for 8 months. The primary efficacy parameter was a serum testosterone level of 50 ng/dL or less. The pharmacokinetics of leuprolide acetate were analyzed in the first 24 enrolled patients. The values are reported as the mean +/- standard error.

RESULTS

Of 90 enrolled patients, 82 (91%) completed the 8-month study. Eight patients voluntarily withdrew from the study for the following reasons: nonmedical reasons (n = 3), treatment-related adverse events (n = 3), disease progression (n = 1), and cardiovascular disease (n = 1). By day 28, 85 (94%) of the 90 patients had achieved a serum testosterone level less than 50 ng/dL. At study completion, 88 (98%) of the 90 patients had a testosterone value less than the castrate level (mean 12.4 +/- 0.8 ng/dL), with 81 (90%) at less than 20 ng/dL. From baseline to month 6, the mean luteinizing hormone level had decreased from 7.51 +/- 0.69 mIU/mL to 0.12 +/- 0.02 mIU/mL. The mean prostate-specific antigen level had decreased 90% from 13.2 +/- 2.0 ng/mL at baseline to 1.3 +/- 0.3 ng/mL at 8 months. No clinically significant flare reactions were observed. The most common treatment-related adverse event was mild hot flashes.

CONCLUSIONS

LA-2575 30.0-mg depot consistently produced and maintained safe and effective suppression of serum testosterone, with total serum testosterone concentrations well below the medical castrate level of less than 50 ng/dL.

Optimisation of treatment by applying programmable rate-controlled drug delivery technology

A number of programmable rate-controlled drug delivery technologies have been developed during the last two decades with the aim of regulating the rate of drug delivery, sustaining the duration of therapeutic action and/or targeting the delivery of drug to a specific tissue. As a result, several therapeutically beneficial outcomes can be achieved, such as: (i) controlled delivery of a therapeutic dose at a desirable rate of delivery; (ii) maintenance of drug concentrations within an optimal therapeutic range for prolonged duration of treatment; (iii) maximisation of efficacy-dose relationship; (iv) reduction of adverse effects; (v) minimisation of the need for frequent dose intake; and (vi) enhancement of patient compliance. The treatment of illness can thus be optimised. To gain a better understanding of how to optimise the treatment of illnesses by applying programmable rate-controlled drug delivery technologies, this article reviews the scientific concepts and technical principles behind the development of various programmable rate-controlled drug delivery systems that have been marketed or are under active development. Finally, the roles of these technologies in optimising therapeutic outcomes in nine therapeutic areas are discussed.

A six-month, open-label study assessing a new formulation of leuprolide 7.5 mg for suppression of testosterone in patients with prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

The safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of monthly subcutaneous injections of a new leuprolide acetate (LA) depot formulation were investigated in patients with advanced prostate cancer.

METHODS

The 2-part, 6-month (168-day), open-label, multicenter study enrolled male patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the prostate (Jewett stage C or D). LA-2500 7.5-mg (a new subcutaneous depot formulation containing 7.5 mg of LA) injections were administered at monthly (28-day) intervals. The primary efficacy parameter was total serum testosterone level. A breakthrough response was defined as a single testosterone measurement > 50 ng/dL after achieving castration testosterone levels. Testosterone was isolated from sera by alumina column chromatography and measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA). LA was purified by solid-phase extraction and high-performance liquid chromatography and was then quantitated by RIA.

RESULTS

One hundred seventeen of the 120 enrolled patients completed the 6-month study. Three patients withdrew for reasons not related to treatment. LA had a mean (SD) maximal concentration of 26.3 (12.6) ng/mL at 4.66 (1.44) hours and was detected for a mean of 37 days (range, 28-49 days). By day 28, 94.1% (112/119) of the patients achieved medical castration (serum testosterone < or = 50 ng/dL). By day 42, 100.0% (118/118) of the patients remaining in the study had serum testosterone levels < or = 50 ng/dL and 97.5% (115/118) had levels < or = 20 ng/dL. At study completion, the mean (SD) serum testosterone level was 6.12 (4.3) ng/dL (range, 3.0-27.0 ng/dL). No breakthrough or acute-on-chronic responses were reported throughout the study. From baseline to month 6, mean (SD) luteinizing hormone level decreased from 8.0 (7.3) mIU/mL to 0.09(0.1) mIU/mL, and mean (SD) prostate-specific antigen level decreased from 32.9 (86.3) ng/mL to 3.2 (12.0) ng/mL. Treatment-related adverse events were reported by 74.2% (89/120) of patients, the most common being hot flashes (56.7%).

CONCLUSION

This 6-month, open-label, noncontrolled study showed LA-2500 7.5-mg depot was well tolerated and maintained testosterone suppression (< or = 50 ng/dL) in the patients completing the study without any testosterone breakthrough responses.

Serum testosterone suppression and potential for agonistic stimulation during chronic treatment with monthly and 3-month depot formulations of leuprolide acetate for advanced prostate cancer

PURPOSE

The pattern of serum testosterone suppression as well as the potential for agonistic stimulation of serum testosterone during chronic treatment was compared in patients with prostate cancer randomized to receive 4 depot injections of either the monthly or 3-month depot formulations of leuprolide acetate in an open label study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 71 patients were enrolled in a randomized prospective study comparing the pattern of serum testosterone suppression and the potential for agonistic stimulation of serum testosterone following reinjection ("acute-on-chronic" effect) during treatment of advanced stage prostate cancer with monthly (7.5 mg.) and 3-month (22.5 mg.) depot formulations of leuprolide acetate.

RESULTS

The 2 formulations produced nearly identical patterns of testosterone suppression which included uniform suppression throughout the duration of the dosing intervals. A transient minor "escape" from suppression (defined as a single testosterone value greater than 50 ng./dl. once suppression was achieved) occurred in 1 patient receiving each formulation. Assessment of agonistic stimulation ("acute-on-chronic" response) following the second depot injection as well as the depot injection following 3 months of treatment for each formulation revealed no pattern of stimulation.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that monthly and 3-month sustained release (depot) formulations of leuprolide acetate provide consistent, uniform suppression of serum testosterone throughout the respective dosing intervals, and that the initial depot injection of each formulation provides sufficient pituitary desensitization to prevent agnostic stimulation of serum testosterone during chronic treatment.

A clinical study of 22.5 mg. La-2550: A new subcutaneous depot delivery system for leuprolide acetate for the treatment of prostate cancer

PURPOSE

The safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of a unique 3-month subcutaneous depot of leuprolide acetate were investigated in patients with prostate cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This open label, noncomparative, 6-month multicenter study enrolled 117 patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the prostate. LA-2550 (22.5 mg. depot) (Atrix Laboratories, Fort Collins, Colorado) was administered subcutaneously once every 3 months. The primary efficacy parameter was serum testosterone 50 ng./dl. or less. Pharmacokinetics were analyzed in a subset of 22 patients.

RESULTS

Of the 117 enrolled patients 111 (98%) completed the 6-month study. Five patients withdrew for nontreatment related events and 1 was withdrawn because he received less than a full dose of the study drug. By day 28, 98% of patients had serum testosterone 50 ng./dl. or less and 84% had achieved 20 ng./dl. or less. By day 35 all patients had 50 ng./dl. or less testosterone. A patient with a breakthrough response after testosterone suppression on day 49 (112 ng./dl.) regained suppression (27 ng./dl.) 14 days after the second injection (day 98). At study completion all patients had 50 ng./dl. or less testosterone (mean plus or minus standard error of mean 10.1 +/- 0.07) and 104 of the 111 (94%) had 20 ng./dl. or less. From baseline to month 6 mean luteinizing hormone decreased from 9.2 +/- 1.1 to 0.08 +/- 0.01 mIU/ml. and mean prostate specific antigen decreased more than 98%. No flare reactions were observed and patient assessments of bone pain and urinary symptoms were unchanged. The most common treatment related adverse event was hot flashes, which were mild in 57% of cases, moderate in 12% and severe in 0%.

CONCLUSIONS

LA-2550 (22.5 mg. depot) produced and maintained safe and effective suppression of serum testosterone to well below the medical castrate level of 50 ng./dl. or less.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of depot leuprorelin

Leuprorelin acetate is a synthetic agonist analogue of gonadotropin-releasing hormone. Continued leuprorelin administration results in suppression of gonadal steroid synthesis, resulting in pharmacological castration. Since leuprorelin is a peptide, it is orally inactive and generally given subcutaneously or intramuscularly. Sustained release parenteral depot formulations, in which the hydrophilic leuprorelin is entrapped in biodegradable highly lipophilic synthetic polymer microspheres, have been developed to avoid daily injections. The peptide drug is released from these depot formulations at a functionally constant daily rate for 1, 3 or 4 months, depending on the polymer type [polylactic/glycolic acid (PLGA) for a 1-month depot and polylactic acid (PLA) for depot of >2 months], with doses ranging between 3.75 and 30mg. Mean peak plasma leuprorelin concentrations (C(max)) of 13.1, 20.8 to 21.8, 47.4, 54.5 and 53 microg/L occur within 1 to 3 hours of depot subcutaneous administration of 3.75, 7.5, 11.25, 15 and 30 mg, respectively, compared with 32 to 35 microg/L at 36 to 60 min after a subcutaneous injection of 1mg of a non-depot formulation. Sustained drug release from the PLGA microspheres maintains plasma concentrations between 0.4 and 1.4 microg/L over 28 days after single 3.75, 7.5 or 15mg depot injections. Mean areas under the concentration-time curve (AUCs) are similar for subcutaneous or intravenous injection of short-acting leuprorelin 1mg; a significant dose-related increase in the AUC from 0 to 35 days is noted after depot injection of leuprorelin 3.75, 7.5 and 15mg. Mean volume of distribution of leuprorelin is 37L after a single subcutaneous injection of 1mg, and 36, 33 and 27L after depot administration of 3.75, 7.5 and 15mg, respectively. Total body clearance is 9.1 L/h and elimination half-life 3.6 hours after a subcutaneous 1mg injection; corresponding values after intravenous injection are 8.3 L/h and 2.9 hours. A 3-month depot PLA formulation of leuprorelin acetate 11.25mg ensures a C(max) of around 20 microg/L at 3 hours after subcutaneous injection, and continuous drug concentrations of 0.43 to 0.19 microg/L from day 7 until before the next injection. Recently, an implant that delivers leuprorelin for 1 year has been evaluated. Serum leuprorelin concentrations remained at a steady mean of 0.93 microg/L until week 52, suggesting zero-order drug release from the implant. In general, regular or depot leuprorelin treatment is well tolerated. Local reactions are more common after application of the 3- or 4-month depot in comparison with the 1-month depot.

An in vivo/in vitro comparison with a leuprolide osmotic implant for the treatment of prostate cancer

An osmotically driven implantable system was designed and characterized for the delivery of leuprolide over a year-long duration. Leuprolide has been used in the treatment of prostate cancer since the 1980s. The DUROS implant consists of a titanium alloy cylinder, measures 4 mm in diameter by 45 mm in length and holds approximately 150 microl of formulation. Stability studies indicated that leuprolide was stable, as a solution formulation in DMSO, for several years at 37 degrees C. In vitro release rate testing, at weekly intervals, showed zero-order delivery for 1 year. DUROS implants demonstrated release rates that were reproducible and similar to one another after storage at 25 degrees C for 18 months prior to testing. In vivo studies, with implants placed subcutaneously, revealed delivery rates comparable to those observed under in vitro conditions. Leuprolide stability was also comparable between in vivo and in vitro conditions. Steady leuprolide serum levels produced by the implant resulted in the desired pharmacodynamic efficacy endpoint of testosterone suppression, both in canines and in humans. The good agreement between in vivo/in vitro delivery rates was as expected for a delivery system based on the principles of osmosis.

Radiation therapy for the treatment of locally advanced and metastatic prostate cancer

Radiation therapy for locally advanced PCa continues to evolve. A current treatment recommendation for nonmetastatic, high-risk disease includes AS combined with RT. The precise duration and sequencing of AS has not been established but most frequently includes treatment in the neoadjuvant, concomitant and, occasionally, adjuvant periods. As technology allows higher doses without significant increases in morbidity and as clinical data provide proof of a radiation dose response, RT doses continue to escalate. The goal of therapy for metastatic disease continues to focus on the relief of pain and the improvement in quality of life. Multiple studies document the significant role RT plays in achieving these goals. Focal RT and systemic radioisotopes have become the mainstay of management in this patient group and the development of newer isotopes that cause less marrow toxicity will improve the therapeutic ratio and provide an opportunity for their use with systemic chemotherapy. As molecular and genomic technologies advance, directed targeting of critical cellular radiation-response pathways hold the promise of improved radiation response and individualized, tailored therapy.