Methotrexate treatment for sarcoid-associated panuveitis

Insights into the diagnosis and management of sarcoid uveitis: A review

Sarcoidosis is a leading cause of non-infectious uveitis that commonly affects middle-aged individuals and has a female preponderance. The disease demonstrates age, sex and ethnic differences in clinical manifestations. A diagnosis of sarcoidosis is made based on a compatible clinical presentation, supporting investigations and histologic evidence of non-caseating granulomas, although biopsy is not always possible. Multimodal imaging with widefield fundus photography, optical coherence tomography and angiography can help in the diagnosis of sarcoid uveitis and in the monitoring of treatment response. Corticosteroid remains the mainstay of treatment; chronic inflammation requires steroid-sparing immunosuppression. Features on multimodal imaging such as vascular leakage may provide prognostic indicators of outcome. Female gender, prolonged and severe uveitis, and posterior involving uveitis are associated with poorer visual outcomes.

Clinical Features and Course in Patients Diagnosed with Ocular Sarcoidosis without Previously Known Systemic Disease at a Tertiary Referral Center in Turkey

PURPOSE

To evaluate the ocular features, course, and prognosis of uveitis in the ocular sarcoidosis (OS) subgroups without previously known systemic sarcoidosis.

METHODS

Ninety-one eyes of 49 patients were included. Definite OS patients were classified as group 1 (n = 15), presumed OS patients as group 2 (n = 15), and probable OS patients as group 3 (n = 19).

RESULTS

 The most common presentation of OS was panuveitis in all groups. During the follow-up, bilateral ocular involvement was observed in 85.7% of the patients. The most common extraocular involvement was pulmonary involvement, which was detected in 61.2% of the patients at the time of diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Ophthalmologists should be aware that uveitis may be the first sign of systemic sarcoidosis. In all subgroups of OS, uveitis tends to be bilateral and the most common type is panuveitis. Therefore, the eye without obvious clinical findings should be carefully evaluated clinically and angiographically.

Hydroxychloroquine Therapy in Sarcoidosis-Associated Uveitis

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and tolerance of hydroxychloroquine in sarcoidosis-associated uveitis.

METHODS

Retrospective study on all patients with sarcoidosis-associated uveitis who were treated with hydroxychloroquine between 2003 and 2019 in a French university hospital.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients with sarcoidosis-associated uveitis received hydroxychloroquine. The mean duration of treatment was 20.0 ± 10.9 months. At the end of the follow-up, hydroxychloroquine success was achieved in 15 (55.6%) patients. Four of them were also on oral corticosteroids, with a prednisone dose ≤5 mg/day. Under treatment, the median prednisone dose decreased from 20.0 (interquartile range (IQR), 7-25) to 5.0 (IQR, 3-6.5) mg/day (p = .02). The incidence rate of flare decreased from 204.6 to 63.8 per 100 person-years (p = .02). Hydroxychloroquine was discontinued in 12 (44.4%) patients during follow-up, including 8 (29.6%) for ineffectiveness, and three who experienced side effects.

CONCLUSION

Hydroxychloroquine appears as an interesting option in sarcoidosis-associated uveitis.Abbreviations: AZA: Azathioprine; BAL: Bronchoalveolar Lavage; BCVA: Best-Corrected Visual Acuity; ENT: Ears, Nose and Throat; HCQ: Hydroxychloroquine; IOP: Intra-Ocular Pressure; IQR: interquartile range; MHC: Major Histocompatibility Complex; MMF: Mycophenolate Mofetil; MTX: Methotrexate; PMSI: Programme de Médicalisation du Système d'Information; SAU: Sarcoidosis-Associated Uveitis; SD: Standard Deviation; SUN: Standard Uveitis Nomenclature.

Diagnosis and Management of Non-Infectious Uveitis in Pediatric Patients

Uveitis in children accounts for 5-10% of all cases. The causes vary considerably. Classically, uveitis is distinguished according to its infectious or inflammatory origin and whether it is part of a systemic disease or represents an isolated ocular disease. It is important to highlight the specificity of certain etiologies among children such as juvenile idiopathic arthritis. The development of visual function can potentially be hindered by amblyopia (children aged < 7 years), in addition to the usual complications (synechiae, macular edema) seen in adult patients. Moreover, the presentation of uveitis in children is often "silent" with few warning signs and few functional complaints from young children, which frequently leads to a substantial diagnostic delay. The diagnostic approach is guided by the presentation of the uveitis, which can be characterized by its location, and corresponds to the initial and main site of intraocular inflammation; its presentation, whether acute or chronic, granulomatous or not; and the response to treatment. Pediatricians have an important role to play and must be aware of the various presentations and etiologies of uveitis in children. Juvenile idiopathic arthritis is the most common etiology of pediatric non-infectious uveitis, but other causes must be recognized. Promptly initiated treatment before complications arise requires early diagnosis, recognition, and treatment. Any dependence on prolonged local corticosteroid therapy justifies discussing the introduction of a corticosteroid-sparing treatment considering the risk to develop corticoid-induced glaucoma and cataracts. Systemic corticosteroid therapy can be required for urgent control of inflammation in the case of severe uveitis. Long-lasting immunosuppressive treatment and biotherapies are most often prescribed at the same time to reinforce treatment efficacy and to prevent relapse and corticosteroid dependency. We review the different causes of uveitis, excluding infection, and the diagnostic and therapeutic management aimed at limiting the risk of irreversible sequelae.

Trends in Immunosuppressive Agent Use for Non-Infectious Uveitis by US Ophthalmologists in Medicare Beneficiaries and Association with Physician-Industry Interactions

PURPOSE

To report the trends of immunosuppressive drug use for non-infectious uveitis and explore their relationship with industry payments.

METHODS

A retrospective review of ophthalmologists reimbursed by Medicare for the administration of adalimumab (ADA), repository corticotropin (RCI), methotrexate (MTX), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) between 2014 and 2018.

RESULTS

A total of 316 ophthalmologists were reimbursed by Medicare for 1567 ADA, 465 RCI, 1752 MTX, and 12 333 MMF administrations. The number and dollar amount of industry payments were positively associated with ADA and RCI use (P < 0.001). From 2014 to 2018, there was a positive trend in the proportion of ADA (P = 0.007) and RCI (P = 0.007) used and negative trend in the proportion of MMF (P = 0.025) used.

CONCLUSION

From 2014 to 2018, the use of ADA and RCI increased while MMF decreased and MTX remained stable. There was a positive association between ADA and RCI use and physician-industry interactions. A causal relationship is not determined.

The Effect of Leflunomide as Adjunctive Therapy With a TNF Inhibitor in Pediatric Patients With Uveitis

PURPOSE

To describe the effectiveness of leflunomide as adjunctive therapy with anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agents in pediatric patients with uveitis who are not able to tolerate methotrexate.

METHODS

A retrospective case series was performed of pediatric patients who were receiving leflunomide in conjunction with anti-TNF agent therapy after intolerance to a combination of methotrexate with anti-TNF therapy. Dose and duration of methotrexate, leflunomide, and anti-TNF therapy were recorded. Extensive history, demographics, laboratory data, and uveitis flare rate were obtained.

RESULTS

A total of five children were included in the study. Most patients were initially receiving methotrexate and an anti-TNF agent was added subsequently due to inadequate response to monotherapy. After discontinuation of methotrexate, leflunomide was initiated with anti-TNF therapy. The replacement of methotrexate with leflunomide showed decreased side effects and was associated with lower flare rates and steroid-free remission.

CONCLUSIONS

Leflunomide was found to be well tolerated and effective at maintaining uveitis quiescence in conjunction with anti-TNF agents in pediatric patients who do not tolerate methotrexate. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2023;60(6):417-420.].

[Sarcoid uveitis: Ophthalmologist's and internist's viewpoints]

Sarcoidosis is one of the leading causes of inflammatory eye disease. All ocular structures can be affected, but uveitis is the main manifestation responsible for vision loss in ocular sarcoidosis. Typical sarcoid anterior uveitis presents with mutton-fat keratic precipitates, iris nodules, and posterior synechiae. Posterior involvement includes vitritis, vasculitis, and choroidal lesions. Cystoid macular edema is the most important and sight-threatening consequence of sarcoid uveitis. Patients with clinically isolated uveitis at diagnosis rarely develop other organ involvement. Even though, ocular sarcoidosis can have a severe impact on visual prognosis, early diagnosis and a wider range of available therapies (including intravitreal implants) have lessened the functional impact of the disease, particularly in the last decade. Corticosteroids are the cornerstone of treatment for sarcoidosis, but up to 30% of patients achieve remission with requiring high-dose systemic steroids. In these cases, the use of steroid-sparing immunosuppressive therapy (such as methotrexate) is unavoidable. Among these immunosuppressive treatments, anti TNF-α drugs have been a revolution in the management of non-infectious uveitis.

[Hydroxychloroquine for non-severe extra-pulmonary sarcoidosis]

Sarcoidosis can develop into a chronic disease in about 30% of cases. When general treatment is indicated, corticosteroids are the first-line treatment. More than one third of patients treated with corticosteroids receive a steroid-sparing agent. Although methotrexate is the most commonly used sparing agent, synthetic antimalarials have been used for more than fifty years on the basis of small, randomised, therapeutic trials. Despite this low level of evidence, chloroquine or more often hydroxychloroquine are used in daily practice, particularly to treat skin, bone and joint sarcoidosis, as well as hypercalcemia and certain types of uveitis. This review summarises the state of knowledge on steroid-sparing therapy in sarcoidosis, particularly in its extra-pulmonary form. These data support the need for good quality therapeutic trials to validate the use of hydroxychloroquine in this specific indication.

Evidence-based efficacy of methotrexate in adult Crohn's disease in different intestinal and extraintestinal indications

INTRODUCTION

Methotrexate (MTX) is included in the therapeutic armamentarium of Crohn's disease (CD), although its positioning is currently uncertain in an era in which many effective biological drugs are available. No systematic reviews or meta-analysis have stratified the clinical outcomes of MTX according to the specific clinical scenarios of its use.

METHODS

Medline, PubMed and Scopus were used to extract eligible studies, from database inception to May 2021. A total of 163 studies were included. A systematic review was performed by stratifying the outcomes of MTX according to formulation, clinical indication and criteria of efficacy.

RESULTS

The use of MTX is supported by randomized clinical trials only in steroid-dependent CD, with similar outcomes to thiopurines. The use of MTX in patients with steroid-refractoriness, failure of thiopurines or in combination with biologics is not supported by high levels of evidence. Combination therapy with biologics can optimize the immunogenic profile of the biological drug, but the impact on long-term clinical outcomes is described only in small series with anti-TNFα. Other off-label uses, such as fistulizing disease, mucosal healing, postoperative prevention and extraintestinal manifestations, are described in small uncontrolled series. The best performance in most indications was shown by parenteral MTX, favouring higher doses (25 mg/week) in the induction phase.

DISCUSSION

Evidence from high-quality studies in favour of MTX is scarce and limited to the steroid-dependent disease, in which other drugs are the leading players today. Many limitations on study design have been found, such as the prevalence of retrospective underpowered studies and the lack of stratification of outcomes according to specific types of patients and formulations of MTX.

CONCLUSION

MTX is a valid option as steroid-sparing agent in steroid-dependent CD. Numerous other clinical scenarios require well-designed clinical studies in terms of patient profile, drug formulation and dosage, and criteria of efficacy.

ERS clinical practice guidelines on treatment of sarcoidosis

BACKGROUND

The major reasons to treat sarcoidosis are to lower the morbidity and mortality risk or to improve quality of life (QoL). The indication for treatment varies depending on which manifestation is the cause of symptoms: lungs, heart, brain, skin, or other manifestations. While glucocorticoids (GC) remain the first choice for initial treatment of symptomatic disease, prolonged use is associated with significant toxicity. GC-sparing alternatives are available. The presented treatment guideline aims to provide guidance to physicians treating the very heterogenous sarcoidosis manifestations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A European Respiratory Society Task Force (TF) committee composed of clinicians, methodologists, and patients with experience in sarcoidosis developed recommendations based on the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations) methodology. The committee developed eight PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) questions and these were used to make specific evidence-based recommendations.

RESULTS

The TF committee delivered twelve recommendations for seven PICOs. These included treatment of pulmonary, cutaneous, cardiac, and neurologic disease as well as fatigue. One PICO question regarding small fiber neuropathy had insufficient evidence to support a recommendation. In addition to the recommendations, the committee provided information on how they use alternative treatments, when there was insufficient evidence to support a recommendation.

CONCLUSIONS

There are many treatments available to treat sarcoidosis. Given the diverse nature of the disease, treatment decisions require an assessment of organ involvement, risk for significant morbidity, and impact on QoL of the disease and treatment.

MESSAGE

An evidence based guideline for treatment of sarcoidosis is presented. The panel used the GRADE approach and specific recommendations are made. A major factor in treating patients is the risk of loss of organ function or impairment of quality of life.

Efficacy and safety of immunomodulatory drugs in patients with non-infectious intermediate and posterior uveitis, panuveitis and macular edema: A systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Non-infectious non-anterior uveitis (NINA) is a sight-threatening condition that often requires immunomodulatory drugs (IMDs) for its management.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the published evidence regarding the use of IMDs in adult patients with NINA uveitis including intermediate (IU) and posterior uveitis (PU), panuveitis (PanU) and macular edema (ME).

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature review. Search strategies were designed for Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Libraries for articles up to 2019 to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the IMDs. A quality assessment was performed using the Jadad Scale.

RESULTS

Nineteen randomized clinical trials were selected from the 1,103 articles retrieved. Characteristics of patients, treatment dosages and outcome measures were heterogeneous. The outcomes most frequently analyzed were visual acuity (VA), macular thickness and vitreous haze (VH). Different IMDs were used at their usual dosages. Methotrexate (MTX), micophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine A (CsA), tacrolimus, adalimumab and sarilumab were effective in NINA uveitis. Rituximab combined with MTX was effective in PU. Interferon-β was superior to MTX, albeit with more adverse events in IU with ME. CsA was similar to cyclophosphamide (Cyc) in Behçet uveitis. Tacrolimus was safer and similar to CsA. Cyc was effective in serpiginoid choroiditis, but when combined with azathioprine in PU, but did not improve VA. Secukinumab did not prevent NINA uveitis recurrences, although intravenously it showed a higher response rate than when used subcutaneously. Daclizumab did not show any benefits in Behçet NINA uveitis.

CONCLUSION

Several IMDs and their combinations can be useful in treating NINA uveitis. The available studies were heterogeneous regarding patient characteristics and outcomes.

Ocular Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is one of the leading causes of inflammatory eye disease. Any part of the eye and its adnexal tissues can be involved. Uveitis and optic neuropathy are the main manifestations, which may require systemic treatment. Two groups of patients with sarcoid uveitis can be distinguished: one of either sex and any ethnicity in which ophthalmological findings are various and another group of elderly Caucasian women with mostly chronic posterior uveitis. Clinically isolated uveitis revealing sarcoidosis remains a strictly ocular condition in a large majority of cases. Although it can be a serious condition involving functional prognosis, early recognition in addition to a growing therapeutic arsenal (including intravitreal implant) has improved the visual prognosis of the disease in recent years. Systemic corticosteroids are indicated when uveitis does not respond to topical corticosteroids or when there is bilateral posterior involvement, especially macular edema. In up to 30% of the cases that require an unacceptable dosage of corticosteroids to maintain remission, additional immunosuppression is used, especially methotrexate. As with other forms of severe noninfectious uveitis, monoclonal antibodies against tumor necrosis factor-α have been used. However, only very rarely does sarcoid uveitis fail to respond to combined corticosteroids and methotrexate therapy, a situation that should suggest either poor adherence or another granulomatous disease. Optic neuropathy often affects women of African and Caribbean origins. Some authors recommend that patients should be treated with high-dose of corticosteroids and concurrent immunosuppression from the onset of this manifestation, which is associated with a poorer outcome.

Effect of Corticosteroid-Sparing Treatment With Mycophenolate Mofetil vs Methotrexate on Inflammation in Patients With Uveitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

IMPORTANCE

Methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil are commonly used immunomodulatory therapies for achieving corticosteroid-sparing control of noninfectious uveitis, but there is uncertainty about which drug is more effective.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of methotrexate and mycophenolate for achieving corticosteroid-sparing control of noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, and panuveitis.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

The First-line Antimetabolites as Steroid-sparing Treatment (FAST) uveitis trial screened 265 adults with noninfectious uveitis requiring corticosteroid-sparing immunosuppressive therapy from 9 referral eye centers in India, the United States, Australia, Saudi Arabia, and Mexico between August 22, 2013, and August 16, 2017. Follow-up ended on August 20, 2018.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to receive oral methotrexate, 25 mg weekly (n = 107), or oral mycophenolate mofetil, 3 g daily (n = 109).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was treatment success at 6 months, which was defined as having control of inflammation in both eyes, no more than 7.5 mg prednisone daily and less than or equal to 2 drops of prednisolone acetate 1%, and no treatment failure due to safety or intolerability. Patients underwent follow-up to 12 months while receiving the same treatment or switched to the other antimetabolite, depending on their 6-month outcome.

RESULTS

Among 216 patients who were randomized (median age, 38 years; 135 (62.5%) women), 194 (89.8%) completed follow-up through 6 months. Treatment success occurred in 64 (66.7%) patients in the methotrexate group vs 56 (57.1%) in the mycophenolate group (difference, 9.5% [95% CI, -5.3% to 21.8%]; odds ratio [OR], 1.50 [95% CI, 0.81 to 2.81]; P = .20). Among patients with posterior uveitis or panuveitis, treatment success was achieved in 58 (74.4%) in the methotrexate group vs 42 (55.3%) in the mycophenolate group (difference, 19.1% [95% CI, 3.6% to 30.6%]; OR, 2.35 [95% CI, 1.16 to 4.90]; P = .02); whereas among patients with intermediate uveitis treatment success occurred in 6 (33.3%) in the methotrexate group vs 14 (63.6%) in the mycophenolate group (difference, -30.3% [95% CI, -51.6% to 1.1%]; OR, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.08 to 1.05]; P = .07; P for interaction = .004). Elevated liver enzymes were the most common nonserious laboratory adverse event, occurring in 14 patients (13.0%) in the methotrexate group and 8 patients (7.4%) in the mycophenolate group.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among adults with noninfectious uveitis, the use of mycophenolate mofetil compared with methotrexate as first-line corticosteroid-sparing treatment did not result in superior control of inflammation. Further research is needed to determine if either drug is more effective based on the anatomical subtype of uveitis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01829295.

Efficacy and adverse reactions of methotrexate in the treatment of ocular cicatricial pemphigoid: A case series study

The application of methotrexate (MTX) in the treatment of autoimmune diseases has been gradually increasing, but reports of MTX treatment for advanced ocular cicatricial pemphigoid (OCP) are extremely rare. This study investigated the efficacy and adverse reactions of low-dose MTX in patients with OCP.This was a retrospective, noncontrolled, case series study. Eleven patients diagnosed with advanced OCP (4 cases in stage III and 7 cases in stage IV) were enrolled. Treatment by oral administration of MTX (7.5 ± 2.5 mg) alone was performed. Visual acuity of the patients, conjunctival inflammation, cicatrization, ocular surface keratinization, and toxic side effects of drugs were evaluated.All patients enrolled in this study were females aged 32 to 83 years. Patients were followed up for 4 to 33 months. Low-dose MTX improved visual acuity of 3 cases (6 eyes, 27.3%). Conjunctival inflammation of 5 patients (10 eyes) rested after treatment, and conjunctival inflammation of 3 cases (6 eyes, 27.3%) was decreased with an effective rate of 72.7%. Cicatrices of 8 cases (15 eyes) showed degeneration after treatment with an effective rate of 71.4% (15/21). Ocular surface keratinization receded in 4 cases with an effective rate of 66.7%. None of the patients discontinued the treatment due to severe toxic side effects. All patients tolerated mild drug-induced gastrointestinal reactions. Three patients terminated the treatment in advance after 4 to 6 months due to no improvement in the disease condition.Observation of clinical efficacy and safety findings demonstrated that low-dose MTX can be used to treat patients with advanced OCP.

A Novel Method for Preparing Surface-Modified Fluocinolone Acetonide Loaded PLGA Nanoparticles for Ocular Use: In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluations

Our objective was to prepare nanoparticulate system using a simple yet attractive innovated method as an ophthalmic delivery system for fluocinolone acetonide to improve its ocular bioavailability. Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles were prepared by adopting thin film hydration method using PLGA/poloxamer 407 in weight ratios of 1:5 and 1:10. PLGA was used in 75/25 and 50/50 copolymer molar ratio of DL-lactide/glycolide. Results revealed that using PLGA with lower glycolic acid monomer ratio exhibited high particle size (PS), zeta potential (ZP) and drug encapsulation efficiency (EE) values with slow drug release pattern. Also, doubling the drug concentration during nanoparticles preparation ameliorated its EE to reach almost 100%. Furthermore, studies for separating the un-entrapped drug in nanoparticles using centrifugation method at 20,000 rpm for 30 min showed that the separated clear supernatant contained nanoparticles encapsulating an important drug amount. Therefore, separation of un-entrapped drug was carried out by filtrating the preparation using 20-25 μm pore size filter paper to avoid drug loss. Aiming to increase the PLGA nanoparticles mucoadhesion ability, surface modification of selected formulation was done using different amount of stearylamine and chitosan HCl. Nanoparticles coated with 0.1% w/v chitosan HCl attained most suitable results of PS, ZP and EE values as well as high drug release properties. Transmission electron microphotographs illustrated the deposition of chitosan molecules on the nanoparticles surfaces. Pharmacokinetic studies on Albino rabbit's eyes using HPLC indicated that the prepared novel chitosan-coated PLGA nanoparticles subjected to separation by filtration showed rapid and extended drug delivery to the eye.

Treatment of Sarcoidosis

Treatment of sarcoidosis is not required in all patients with the diagnosis. The decision to treat and the strategy for how to treat usually require input and shared decision making by the patient. Some common consequences of sarcoidosis are not caused by granulomatous inflammation, but may be the dominant disease manifestation and should be actively considered when formulating a treatment plan. The medication regimen should be tailored to each patient. Steroid-sparing medications should be prescribed early as part of a long-term strategy.

Ocular Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is one of the leading causes of inflammatory eye disease. Ocular sarcoidosis can involve any part of the eye and its adnexal tissues and may cause uveitis, episcleritis/scleritis, eyelid abnormalities, conjunctival granuloma, optic neuropathy, lacrimal gland enlargement, and orbital inflammation. Glaucoma and cataract can be complications from inflammation itself or adverse effects from therapy. Ophthalmic manifestations can be isolated or associated with other organ involvement. Patients with ocular sarcoidosis can present with a wide range of clinical presentations and severity. Multidisciplinary approaches are required to achieve the best treatment outcomes for both ocular and systemic manifestations.

Corticosteroids in Sarcoidosis

Corticosteroids are the drug of choice for the treatment of sarcoidosis. Because the natural course of sarcoidosis may be self-limiting and/or cause no long-term harm, treatment is not mandatory. Corticosteroids are usually effective for all forms of sarcoidosis, and they work quickly. However, because of the potential toxicities of corticosteroids, alternative medications often need to be considered. Efforts should be made to minimize the corticosteroid dose while keeping the risk of toxicity as low as possible. This article outlines the indications for corticosteroid therapy for sarcoidosis, discusses various dosing regimens, and suggests when alternative corticosteroid agents should be considered.

Comparing Prednisone and Methotrexate to Off-label Biologic Infliximab for Management of Ocular Uveitis: A Cost-minimization Analysis

Background: Approximately 3.75% of cases of blindness in the United States are caused by uveitis. Incurred clinical costs and lost productivity related to vision loss in these cases totals $3.58 billion annually. Objective: To evaluate whether infliximab, a modern off-label biologic, is cost-effective for treating posterior uveitis and panuveitis compared to current standards of care, methotrexate and prednisone. Methods: A cost-effectiveness analysis using a Markov model to simulate a patient cohort with posterior uveitis or panuveitis. The model followed patients' therapy from the onset of posterior uveitis or panuveitis using the U.S. societal perspective. The lifetime model simulated health states that could lead to successful reversal of uveitis with standard or intensified treatment with prednisone, methotrexate, or infliximab. Probabilities, health utilities, and costs were included in the model based on findings from the literature. We conducted univariate sensitivity analyses and a Bayesian multivariate probablistic sensitivity analysis to estimate uncertainty in results. Outcomes were measured in terms of costs ($US, 2010) and effects (qualityadjusted life years; QALYs) discounted at 3% per year were estimated for each simulated treatment. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for pairwise results was interpretted assuming a predetermined willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000/QALY. Results: Average lifetime costs and QALYs for each drug were ($306.95; 15.80 QALYs) for prednisone, methotrexate ($36,232.24; 16.21 QALYs), and inflixmab ($74,762.63; 15.04 QALYs). Methotrexate was on average compared to prednisone, with an ICER of $86,901.16/QALY. Prednisone and methotrexate dominated infliximab. Sensitivity analyses suggested that the model was most sensitive to the utility for successful recovery from uveitis. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis returned results similar to the base case. Conclusion: This cost-effectiveness analysis suggests that despite advances in the use of biologics for treating sight-threatening posterior uveitis and panuveitis, infliximab had lower effectiveness and higher costs compared to both prednisone and methotrexate. As compared to prednisone, methotrexate was associated with increased costs and QALYs and was found to be a good value. Clinical trials of infliximab in the uveitis population are needed to reduce the uncertain estimates of inflixmab treatment success and the drug's cost-effectiveness.

Uveitis profile and treatment response in Iranian patients with sarcoidosis

The aim of the study was to assess the clinical features and treatment responses in Iranian patients with sarcoid uveitis. A retrospective review of patients diagnosed with sarcoid uveitis from 1996 to 2010 was performed in a referral clinic in Tehran, Iran. Demographic and clinical features of patients, treatment modalities and therapeutic responses, and outcomes were recorded. Sixty-six eyes from 36 patients were studied. Twenty cases had biopsy-proven sarcoidosis. Mean duration of follow-up was 44.7 ± 45 months (range 3-175). Thirty-six eyes (54.5 %) had intermediate uveitis, 25 (37.9 %) panuveitis, and 5 (7.6 %) anterior uveitis. Twenty patients (55.5 %) responded to both systemic and/or topical corticosteroids, and 16 (44.4 %) required immunomodulatory drugs for control of uveitis. All of the patients finally responded to treatment in the form of inflammation reduction and/or vision improvement. The average time interval before initial clinical response following treatment was 3.2 ± 3 months (range 1-72). This study disclosed a higher predominance of females and intermediate form of uveitis in Iranian patients with sarcoid uveitis. Use of immunomodulatory drugs combined with corticosteroids resulted in good visual outcome and control of uveitis with a possible fewer corticosteroid side effects.

A randomized clinical trial comparing methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil for noninfectious uveitis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the relative effectiveness of methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil for noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, or panuveitis.

DESIGN

Multicenter, block-randomized, observer-masked clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

Eighty patients with noninfectious intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis requiring corticosteroid-sparing therapy at Aravind Eye Hospitals in Madurai and Coimbatore, India.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomized to receive 25 mg weekly oral methotrexate or 1 g twice daily oral mycophenolate mofetil and were monitored monthly for 6 months. Oral prednisone and topical corticosteroids were tapered.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Masked examiners assessed the primary outcome of treatment success, defined by achieving the following at 5 and 6 months: (1) ≤0.5+ anterior chamber cells, ≤0.5+ vitreous cells, ≤0.5+ vitreous haze and no active retinal/choroidal lesions in both eyes, (2) ≤10 mg of prednisone and ≤2 drops of prednisolone acetate 1% a day, and (3) no declaration of treatment failure because of intolerability or safety. Additional outcomes included time to sustained corticosteroid-sparing control of inflammation, change in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, resolution of macular edema, adverse events, subgroup analysis by anatomic location, and medication adherence.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were randomized to methotrexate and 39 to mycophenolate mofetil. A total of 67 patients (35 methotrexate, 32 mycophenolate mofetil) contributed to the primary outcome. Sixty-nine percent of patients achieved treatment success with methotrexate and 47% with mycophenolate mofetil (P = 0.09). Treatment failure from adverse events or tolerability was not different by treatment arm (P = 0.99). There were no differences between treatment groups in time to corticosteroid-sparing control of inflammation (P = 0.44), change in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (P = 0.68), or resolution of macular edema (P = 0.31).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no statistically significant difference in corticosteroid-sparing control of inflammation between patients receiving methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil. However, there was a 22% difference in treatment success favoring methotrexate.

Extrapulmonary manifestations of sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a systemic disease characterized by the development of epithelioid granulomas in various organs. Although the lungs are involved in most patients with sarcoidosis, virtually any organ can be affected. Recognition of extrapulmonary sarcoidosis requires awareness of the organs most commonly affected, such as the skin and the eyes, and vigilance for the most dangerous manifestations, such as cardiac and neurologic involvement. In this article, the common extrapulmonary manifestations of sarcoidosis are reviewed and organ-specific therapeutic considerations are discussed.

The frequency of granulomatous lacrimal gland inflammation as a cause of lacrimal gland enlargement in patients without a diagnosis of systemic sarcoidosis

PURPOSE

To determine the rates of orbital sarcoidosis in patients with clinical lacrimal gland enlargement and no history of sarcoidosis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients from the Orbital Surgery Service at Wills Eye Institute who underwent lacrimal gland incisional biopsy from 1994-2009 for lacrimal gland enlargement. Patients were excluded if they had a history of sarcoidosis, other autoimmunities, or lacrimal gland enlargement thought to be malignant in etiology. Subject charts were reviewed for pathology results, as well as clinical and demographic data. Rates of sarcoidosis in a patient population presenting with isolated lacrimal gland enlargement were thereby analyzed.

RESULTS

75 patients fulfilling study criteria had lacrimal gland biopsies. 67 (89)% had benign lacrimal gland pathology and 8 (11)% had malignant lacrimal gland pathology. Sarcoidosis was found histologically in 15 (20%). The most frequent pathologic finding was non-specific chronic non-granulomatous inflammation, seen in 32 (43%) studies specimens. Age and gender were not statistically different between sarcoid positive and sarcoid negative patients. Patients with a positive biopsy were more likely to be African American. 26 (35%) of the studied patients had ACE levels obtained. The average ACE level was statistically greater in patients with sarcoidosis-positive biopsies than in those with negative biopsies.

DISCUSSION

In patients with clinical lacrimal gland enlargement, incisional biopsy led to a diagnosis of sarcoidosis in 20% of patients. An elevated ACE level may help predict which patients have a greater diagnostic yield with biopsy.

Monitoring of nonsteroidal immunosuppressive drugs in patients with lung disease and lung transplant recipients: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines

OBJECTIVES

Immunosuppressive pharmacologic agents prescribed to patients with diffuse interstitial and inflammatory lung disease and lung transplant recipients are associated with potential risks for adverse reactions. Strategies for minimizing such risks include administering these drugs according to established, safe protocols; monitoring to detect manifestations of toxicity; and patient education. Hence, an evidence-based guideline for physicians can improve safety and optimize the likelihood of a successful outcome. To maximize the likelihood that these agents will be used safely, the American College of Chest Physicians established a committee to examine the clinical evidence for the administration and monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs (with the exception of corticosteroids) to identify associated toxicities associated with each drug and appropriate protocols for monitoring these agents.

METHODS

Committee members developed and refined a series of questions about toxicities of immunosuppressives and current approaches to administration and monitoring. A systematic review was carried out by the American College of Chest Physicians. Committee members were supplied with this information and created this evidence-based guideline.

CONCLUSIONS

It is hoped that these guidelines will improve patient safety when immunosuppressive drugs are given to lung transplant recipients and to patients with diffuse interstitial lung disease.

Therapy for sarcoidosis: evidence-based recommendations

The options for treatment of sarcoidosis have expanded. In this article, we outline a stepwise approach to treatment. Recommendations for treatment are based on available evidence. While corticosteroids remain the treatment of choice for initial systemic therapy, other agents have been shown to be steroid sparing, and therefore useful for long-term management. In addition, new agents have proved to be useful for patients with refractory disease.

Adalimumab successful in sarcoidosis patients with refractory chronic non-infectious uveitis

INTRODUCTION

Adalimumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeted against TNF-α, has proved to be successful in the treatment of uveitis. Another anti-TNF-α agent, i.e., infliximab, has been reported of benefit in the treatment of refractory sarcoidosis. The aim of this prospective case series was to evaluate the effect of adalimumab on intraocular inflammatory signs and other relevant clinical manifestations (lung function, serological inflammatory parameters, and fatigue) of sarcoidosis.

METHODS

Sarcoidosis patients with refractory posterior uveitis (n = 26, 17 females, 41 eyes in total) were systematically followed for 12 months after initiation of adalimumab 40 mg sc once a week. Inclusion criteria were non-responsiveness to prednisone and methotrexate (MTX) or intolerance to these drugs. Adjunctive therapy with prednisone and MTX was tapered during treatment with adalimumab. Localization and improvement, stabilization or deterioration of intraocular inflammatory signs was scored. Pulmonary function- and laboratory testing were performed and Fatigue Assessment Scale was completed. Results at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months were compared.

RESULTS

Choroidal involvement resolved in 10/15 patients, five had partial improvement; vasculitis resolved in 1/1 patient; papillitis resolved in 7/8 patients, one had partial response; macular edema resolved in 5/8 patients, three had partial response; vitreous cleared completely in 5/5 patients. Overall outcome regarding intraocular inflammatory signs showed improvement in 22 patients (85%) and stabilization in four patients (15%). At 12 months, no recurrences were reported in those successfully treated. Laboratory parameters of inflammatory activity (C-reactive protein; serum angiotensin-converting enzyme and soluble interleukin-2 Receptor) improved (p < 0.01). Moreover, fatigue improved in 14/21 (67%) of the patients suffering from fatigue and the diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) improved in 7/8 (88%) of patients with a decreased DLCO (p < 0.01). The dosage of both prednisone and MTX could be tapered down significantly (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Adalimumab appeared successful in sarcoidosis patients with refractory chronic non-infectious uveitis showing improvement in intraocular inflammatory signs as well as in other relevant clinical indicators of disease activity. Future randomized studies are needed to determine the optimal dosage, dose interval and duration of therapy in refractory multisystemic sarcoidosis.

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor treatment for sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a chronic multisystem disease of unknown etiology, characterized by noncaseating granulomatous infiltration of virtually any organ system. Treatment is often undertaken in an attempt to resolve symptoms or prevent progression to organ failure. Previous studies have suggested a prominent role for tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) in the inflammatory process seen in sarcoidosis. TNF-α and interleukin-1 are released by alveolar macrophages in patients with active lung disease. Corticosteroids have proved to be efficacious in the treatment of sarcoidosis, possibly by suppressing the production of TNF-α and other cytokines. Three agents are currently available as specific TNF antagonists: etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab. Although data from noncomparative trials suggest that all three have comparable therapeutic effects in rheumatoid arthritis, their effects in a granulomatous disease such as sarcoidosis are less consistent. In this review, current data on the effectiveness are summarized.

Pars plana vitrectomy, fluocinolone acetonide implantation, and silicone oil infusion for the treatment of chronic, refractory uveitic hypotony

PURPOSE

To assess the feasibility and outcomes of combining fluocinolone acetonide sustained drug delivery implant insertion, pars plana vitrectomy, and silicone oil infusion to treat patients with chronic, refractory ocular hypotony resulting from uveitis.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

METHODS

A retrospective, institutional chart review was performed. Outcome measures included visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 13 eyes of 11 patients were studied. All patients were women, had a mean age of 57 years (range, 26 to 73 years), and had a diagnosis of panuveitis. The mean duration of preoperative hypotony was 42 months (range, 11 to 108 months). Patients were followed up on average for 22 months (range, 9 to 46 months) after the combined surgical procedure. The mean preoperative visual acuity was 20/1000 (logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution, 1.7). At the 6- and 12-month visits, the mean visual acuity remained stable at 20/800 (logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution, 1.6; P = .74) and 20/600 (P = .34), respectively. At baseline, the mean intraocular pressure (IOP) was 2.3 mm Hg. The average IOP was 5.9 mm Hg, 5.1 mm Hg, and 5.0 mm Hg at 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery, respectively. The increase in IOP relative to the baseline IOP was statistically significant at 6 and 12 months (P = .027 and P = .004, respectively). The duration of preoperative hypotony inversely correlated with the IOP at 6 months (P = .027). No intraoperative complications were encountered and the procedure was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Fluocinolone acetonide implantation combined with pars plana vitrectomy and silicone oil infusion is feasible and is well tolerated in the management of chronic, refractory ocular hypotony associated with uveitis.

[Branch retinal vein occlusion and sarcoidosis in a child: a case report]

We report a case of branch retinal vein occlusion associated with sarcoidosis in a child. A 13-year-old boy with a history of chronic fatigue was referred for ophthalmologic examination. Fundus examination in the right eye showed periphlebitis of the inferotemporal branch retinal vein, with nerve fiber layer hemorrhages without iridocyclitis. A fluorescein angiogram confirmed the occlusion of the inferotemporal branch retinal vein. His left eye was normal. The diagnosis of sarcoidosis, suggested by the presence of bilateral hilar adenopathy, increased angiotensin-converting enzyme levels, and lymphocytosis in the broncho-alveolar lavage, was confirmed by liver biopsy demonstrating epithelioid granulomas. Branch retinal vein occlusion was successfully treated with systemic corticosteroids. Branch retinal vein occlusion may occur as a rare vascular complication of sarcoidosis even without iridocyclitis.

Systemic treatment of sarcoidosis

PURPOSE

To compare the evidence base and systemic treatment strategies for sarcoidosis.

METHODS

Medline and EMBASE literature search on "sarcoidosis AND treatment", "sarcoidosis AND uveitis AND treatment", and "sarcoidosis AND eye AND treatment". The search was limited to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 19 RCTs for the systemic treatment of extraocular sarcoidosis were identified. The majority were on corticosteroid-oral and inhaled. There were two meta-analyses on corticosteroid, including a Cochrane review. Only two RCTs were indentified for the treatment of intraocular sarcoidosis, one on etanercept, and the other from 1967 on prednisolone or oxyphenbutazone vs. placebo. There were no meta-analyses. Due to the paucity of RCTs other treatment studies were included but these were limited to only a few immunosuppressive agents and on small numbers of patients.

CONCLUSION

Limited high-quality evidence exists for the systemic treatment of sarcoidosis, in particular intraocular disease.

Mycophenolate mofetil monotherapy in the management of paediatric uveitis

PURPOSE

To evaluate effectiveness and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) monotherapy in paediatric autoimmune uveitis.

METHODS

We reviewed medical records of patients, 18 years of age or younger, with autoimmune uveitis treated with MMF at our practice from 2005 to 2009. The dose and duration of MMF therapy, inflammation status, visual acuity, previous immunomodulatory therapies, and adverse effects were recorded. In addition, the following subgroups were defined: (1) Durable Disease Control: patients whose uveitis remained quiescent for at least 2 years on MMF monotherapy, with no more than two flare-ups successfully treated with an increase in MMF dosage and/or a short course (<1 month) of corticosteroids; (2) Short-term Inflammation Control: patients whose uveitis remained quiescent for less than 2 years, with no more than one flare-up successfully treated with an increase in MMF dosage and/or a short course of corticosteroids, or who initially achieved inflammation control but discontinued MMF because of significant adverse effects.

RESULTS

A total of 38 out of 52 patients (73.1%) obtained inflammation control following 2 months of MMF monotherapy, achieving ≤ 0.5+ grading in anterior chamber cell/flare and vitreous haze. In the cross-sectional analysis, 25 patients (48.1%) met the criteria for Durable Disease Control, and 13 others (25.0%) qualified for Short-term Inflammation Control. Visual acuity remained stable or improved in 94.2% of the study population. Six patients (11.5%) discontinued MMF because of significant adverse effects, the most common of which was gastrointestinal disturbances.

CONCLUSION

MMF monotherapy appears to be an effective and safe treatment in paediatric autoimmune uveitis.

The potential of newer immunomodulating drugs in the treatment of uveitis: a review

Uveitis, or intraocular inflammation, remains an ongoing challenge to ophthalmologists and patients alike. In most patients, uveitis is limited to the anterior ocular structures and is readily managed with topical steroids. The inflammatory process can extend behind the lens to involve the pars plana, the vitreous cavity, the choroid and the retina. These intermediate and posterior uveitides are relatively rare but contribute disproportionately to visual morbidity and present serious diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties. Systemic steroids constitute the first line of treatment for most sight-threatening uveitides. Their long term use is limited by universal and debilitating adverse effects. Second-line, steroid-sparing agents allow a reduction in steroid dosage. Cyclosporin and azathioprine are the main steroid-sparing agents currently in use. However, these compounds are limited by a narrow therapeutic window and significant adverse effects. This paper offers a brief discussion of some of the immune mechanisms involved in the pathogenesis of uveitis and reviews categories of investigational compounds. Inhibitors of T cell function: tacrolimus (previously FK506), licensed for use in liver transplantation, and sirolimus (rapamycin) are macrolide antibiotics. Sirolimus is a functional cytokine antagonist and in vitro studies suggest it could be up to 100 times more potent than cyclosporin. Drug synergy between sirolimus and cyclosporin has been demonstrated, resulting in immunosuppression at lower drug doses and with fewer adverse effects. Nucleotide synthesis inhibitors: mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and leflunomide. Human lymphocytes are only able to synthesise nucleic acids de novo. Having no alternative or 'salvage' pathway, they are exquisitely sensitive to interference with the de novo nucleotide synthesis enzymatic pathway. MMF is a purine synthesis inhibitor. Compared to other purine inhibitors, early data suggest that MMF is more efficacious and less toxic than azathioprine. Leflunomide is an inhibitor of pyrimidine synthesis. Monoclonal surface receptor antibodies and immunoadhesins: the IL-2 receptor is essential for clonal expansion of activated T cells; this has led to the development of anti-IL-2 receptor antibodies. Daclizumab is a genetically engineered humanised IgG1 monoclonal antibody. In conjunction with cyclosporin, it significantly reduces renal allograft rejection rates and is also showing promise in the treatment of T cell mediated autoimmune disorders. The mechanism of action of monoclonal antibodies to other pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNFalpha and IL-12 and data from animal and human uveitis trials are also discussed. Finally, new avenues of research in immunopharmaco-modulation are mentioned.

Current approach in the diagnosis and management of panuveitis

Panuveitis is a generalized inflammation of not only the whole of the uveal tract but also involves the retina and vitreous humor. It differs from other anatomical sites of inflammation in terms of causes as well as distribution. The common causes of panuveitis in our population are tuberculosis, Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada syndrome, sympathetic ophthalmia, Behcet's disease and sarcoidosis. A large number of cases still remain idiopathic. A stepwise approach is essential while evaluating these patients to be able to identify and treat the disease timely and correctly. Ancillary tests can be appropriately applied once the anatomic site of inflammation is identified. An exhaustive approach comprising a full battery of tests is obsolete. Only specific tailored investigations are ordered as suggested by the preliminary clinical and ocular examination. The mainstay of the treatment of uveitis is corticosteroids. Immunosuppressive agents are administered if the inflammation is not adequately controlled with corticosteroids. One of the recent breakthroughs in the treatment of refractory uveitis includes the introduction of immunomodulating drugs: Tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonist and Interferon-alpha. Vitrectomy has been used in uveitis for over a few decades for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. When compared to other anatomical sites of inflammation, panuveitis has poor visual outcome due to more widespread inflammation. The side-effects of the chronic treatment that these patients receive cannot be overlooked and should be specifically monitored under the supervision of an internist with special interest in inflammatory diseases.

Pars plana vitrectomy in the management of paediatric uveitis: the Massachusetts Eye Research and Surgery Institution experience

PURPOSE

To assess the effectiveness and safety of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) in the management of chronic paediatric uveitis.

METHODS

We reviewed records of patients 16 years old or younger who underwent PPV due to persistent uveitis. Data including inflammatory status, ocular findings, visual acuity, dosage and duration of various medical therapies, surgical techniques and complications were collected.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight eyes of 20 patients were included in the study. The diagnoses of uveitis included pars planitis in 15 eyes (54%), idiopathic panuveitis in 8 eyes (29%), and juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated iridocyclitis in five eyes (18%). Six eyes presented with associated retinal vasculitis. The mean age at the time of PPV was 11.2 years. The mean follow-up after surgery was 13.5 months. All 28 eyes had active uveitis with or without medical therapy at the time of PPV. At last follow-up, uveitis control was achieved with or without adjuvant medical therapy in 27 eyes (96%). These included five of the six eyes with persistent retinal vasculitis. Two eyes that had 20-G PPV developed intra-operative retinal tears. Four eyes with pre-operative clear lenses developed cataract within the first 6 months after PPV.

CONCLUSIONS

PPV is effective and safe in the management of chronic paediatric uveitis and its complications. It was able to reduce the amount of systemic medications required to control inflammation in this study. Patients with uveitis complicated by retinal vasculitis, however, are more likely to require long-term medical therapy to achieve inflammatory control.

Methotrexate for ocular inflammatory diseases

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcome of treatment with methotrexate for noninfectious ocular inflammation.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with noninfectious ocular inflammation managed at 4 tertiary ocular inflammation clinics in the United States observed to add methotrexate as a single, noncorticosteroid immunosuppressive agent to their treatment regimen, between 1979 and 2007, inclusive.

METHODS

Participants were identified from the Systemic Immunosuppressive Therapy for Eye Diseases Cohort Study. Demographic and clinical characteristics, including dosage, route of administration of methotrexate, and main outcome measures, were obtained for every eye of every patient at every visit via medical record review by trained expert reviewers.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Control of inflammation, corticosteroid-sparing effects, and incidence of and reason for discontinuation of therapy.

RESULTS

Among 384 patients (639 eyes) observed from the point of addition of methotrexate to an anti-inflammatory regimen, 32.8%, 9.9%, 21.4%, 14.6%, 15.1%, and 6.3%, respectively, had anterior uveitis, intermediate uveitis, posterior or panuveitis, scleritis, ocular mucous membrane pemphigoid, and other forms of ocular inflammation. In these groups, complete suppression of inflammation sustained for >or=28 days was achieved within 6 months in 55.6%, 47.4%, 38.6%, 56.4%, 39.5%, and 76.7%, respectively. Corticosteroid-sparing success (sustained suppression of inflammation with prednisone <or=10 mg/d) was achieved within 6 months among 46.1%, 41.3%, 20.7%, 37.3%, 36.5%, and 50.9%, respectively. Overall, success within 12 months was 66% and 58.4% for sustained control and corticosteroid sparing (<or=10 mg), respectively. Methotrexate was discontinued within 1 year by 42% of patients. It was discontinued owing to ineffectiveness in 50 patients (13%); 60 patients (16%) discontinued because of side effects, which typically were reversible with dose reduction or discontinuation. Remission was seen in 43 patients, with 7.7% remitting within 1 year of treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that adding methotrexate to an anti-inflammatory regimen not involving other noncorticosteroid immunosuppressive drugs is moderately effective for management of inflammatory activity and for achieving corticosteroid-sparing objectives, although many months may be required for therapeutic success. Methotrexate was well tolerated by most patients, and seems to convey little risk of serious side effects during treatment.