Naltrexone-reversible pain suppression in the isolated attacking mouse

Internal and External Factors Affecting the Development of Neuropathic Pain in Rodents. Is It All About Pain?

It is important to know the factors that will influence animal models of neuropathic pain. A good reproducibility and predictability in different strains of animals for a given test increases the clinical relevance and possible targeting. An obligatory requirement for enabling comparisons of results of different origin is a meticulous definition of the specific sensitivities of a model for neuropathic pain and a description of the test conditions. Factors influencing neuropathic pain behavior can be subdivided in external and internal factors. The most important external factors are; timing of the measurement of pain after induction of neuropathy, circadian rhythms, seasonal influences, air humidity, influence of order of testing, diet, social variables, housing and manipulation, cage density, sexual activity, external stress factors, and influences of the experimenter. The internal factors are related to the type of animal, its genetic background, gender, age, and the presence of homeostatic adaptation mechanisms to specific situations or stress. In practice, the behavioral presentations to pain depend on the combination of genetic and environmental factors such as accepted social behavior. It also depends on the use of genetic manipulation of the animals such as in transgenic animals. These make the interpretation of data even more difficult. Differences of pain behavior between in- and outbred animals will be better understood by using modern analysis techniques. Substrains of animals with a high likelihood for developing neuropathic pain make the unraveling of specific pathophysiological mechanisms possible. Concerning the effect of stress on pain, it is important to differentiate between external and internal stress such as social coping behavior. The individual dealing with this stress is species sensitive, and depends on the genotype and the social learning. In the future, histo-immunological and genetic analysis will highlight similarities of the different pathophysiological mechanisms of pain between different species and human subjects. The final objective for the study of pain is to describe the genetics of the eliciting pain mechanisms in humans and to look for correlations with the knowledge from basic research. Therefore, it is necessary to know the genetic evolution of the different mechanisms in chronic pain. In order to be able to control the clinical predictability of a putative treatment the evolutionary pharmacogenomic structure of specific transmitters and receptors must be clarified.

Identification and ranking of genetic and laboratory environment factors influencing a behavioral trait, thermal nociception, via computational analysis of a large data archive

Laboratory conditions in biobehavioral experiments are commonly assumed to be 'controlled', having little impact on the outcome. However, recent studies have illustrated that the laboratory environment has a robust effect on behavioral traits. Given that environmental factors can interact with trait-relevant genes, some have questioned the reliability and generalizability of behavior genetic research designed to identify those genes. This problem might be alleviated by the identification of the most relevant environmental factors, but the task is hindered by the large number of factors that typically vary between and within laboratories. We used a computational approach to retrospectively identify and rank sources of variability in nociceptive responses as they occurred in a typical research laboratory over several years. A machine-learning algorithm was applied to an archival data set of 8034 independent observations of baseline thermal nociceptive sensitivity. This analysis revealed that a factor even more important than mouse genotype was the experimenter performing the test, and that nociception can be affected by many additional laboratory factors including season/humidity, cage density, time of day, sex and within-cage order of testing. The results were confirmed by linear modeling in a subset of the data, and in confirmatory experiments, in which we were able to partition the variance of this complex trait among genetic (27%), environmental (42%) and genetic x environmental (18%) sources.

An ethological model for the study of activation and interaction of pain, memory and defensive systems in the attacked mouse. Role of endogenous opioids

The present work reviews neurochemical, physiological and behavioral data recorded from the attacked mouse and integrates them into a model of coping mechanisms during social conflict. More specifically, the possible relationships between systems of pain, memory and defense are presented, with special emphasis on the role of endogenous opioid peptides (EOPs). In recipients of attack, decreased beta-endorphin-like immunoreactivity and changes in opiate and benzodiazepine binding characteristics are found in structures of the brain defensive system. EOPs mediate the social conflict-induced increase of dopamine synthesis in the periaqueductal grey and frontal cortex. Social conflict analgesia in attacked mice is under the control of central opioid and nonopioid (e.g., benzodiazepine, glutamate) mechanisms, and is modified by experience (e.g., long-term analgesic reaction; tolerance). EOPs and pain-inhibitory mechanisms participate in the organization of behavioral defense, recuperative behavior and the memory of attack experience. The data are considered in relation to the perceptual-defensive-recuperative model of fear and pain, forwarded by Bolles and Fanselow.

Endogenous opiates: 1988

This paper is the eleventh installment in our annual review of the research during the past year involving the endogenous opiate system. It is concerned with nonanalgesic and behavioral studies of the opiate peptides that were published during 1988. The specific topics this year include stress; tolerance and dependence; eating; drinking; gastrointestinal, renal, and hepatic functions; mental illness; learning, memory, and reward; cardiovascular responses; respiration and thermoregulation; seizures and other neurological disorders; electrical activity; locomotor activity; sex, pregnancy, and development; immunology and cancer; and other behavior.