Apparently unrelated clones shown by spectral karyotyping to represent clonal evolution of cryptic t(10;11)(p13;q23) in a patient with acute monoblastic leukemia

Cytogenetically Unrelated Clones in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Showing Different Responses to Chemotherapy

We report a case of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with two cytogenetically unrelated clones. The patient was a 45-year-old male who was diagnosed with acute monoblastic leukemia (AMoL). Initial G-band analysis showed 51,XY,+6,+8,inv(9)(p12q13)c,+11,+13,+19[12]/52,idem,+Y[8], but G-band analysis after induction therapy showed 45,XY,-7,inv(9)(p12q13)c[19]/46,XY,inv(9)(p12q13)c[1]. Retrospective FISH analysis revealed a cryptic monosomy 7 clone in the initial AML sample. The clone with multiple trisomies was eliminated after induction therapy and never recurred, but a clone with monosomy 7 was still detected in myelodysplastic marrow with a normal blast percentage. Both clones were successfully eliminated after related peripheral blood stem cell transplantation, but the patient died of relapsed AML with monosomy 7. We concluded that one clone was de novo AMoL with chromosome 6, 8, 11, 13, and 19 trisomy and that the other was acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes(AML-MRC) with chromosome 7 monosomy showing different responses to chemotherapy. Simultaneous onset of cytogenetically unrelated hematological malignancies that each have a different disease status is a rare phenomenon but is important to diagnose for a correct understanding of the disease status and for establishing an appropriate treatment strategy.

Mutation position within evolutionary subclonal architecture in AML

Cytogenetic data suggest that acute myeloid leukemia (AML) develops through a process of branching evolution, especially during relapse and progression. Recent genomic data from AML cases using digital sequencing, temporal comparisons, xenograft cloning, and single-cell analysis indicate that most, if not all, AML cases emerge through branching evolution. According to a review of the current literature, the balanced translocations (t[15;17], t[8;21], and inv[16]) and nucleotide variants in DNMT3A and TET2 most commonly occur in the founding clone at diagnosis. These mutations are rarely gained or lost at relapse, and the latter 2 mutations are observed in elderly subjects with mosaic hematopoiesis antedating overt leukemia. In contrast, +8, +13, +22, -X, -Y, and nucleotide variants in FLT3, NRAS/KRAS, WT1, and KIT frequently occur in subclones and are observed either to emerge or to be lost at relapse. Because drugs that target mutations within a subclone are unlikely to eliminate all leukemic cells, it will be essential to understand not only which mutations a patient has but also how they organize within the leukemic subclonal architecture.

Multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization characterization of cytogenetically polyclonal hematologic malignancies

Several different investigations and methodologies have provided data supporting a monoclonal origin of neoplasia. For example, the vast majority of neoplastic disorders are cytogenetically monoclonal. Occasionally, however, clones with unrelated karyotypic anomalies are found, as, for example, in approximately 2% of acute myeloid leukemias (AML), myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and chronic myeloproliferative disorders (CMD). Whether such a cytogenetic polyclonality represents a polyclonal origin or whether different clones share a submicroscopic primary change, indicating a monoclonal origin, remains to be elucidated. Our objective was to ascertain if cryptic aberrations can be found in cytogenetically polyclonal hematologic malignancies using multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization (M-FISH). Fourteen AML, MDS, and CMD cases were investigated. In none of these was a cryptic aberration found, common to all subclones, although the karyotypes were revised in two AMLs and one MDS. Thus, all malignancies were still classified as polyclonal after the M-FISH analyses. Based on the present results, we conclude that M-FISH, in general, does not reveal primary cryptic aberrations supporting a monoclonal origin of cytogenetically polyclonal hematologic malignancies.

Frequencies and characterization of cytogenetically unrelated clones in various hematologic malignancies: seven years of experiences in a single institution

Cytogenetically unrelated clones are uncommon findings in hematologic disorders. In the present study, among the 1,110 various hematologic malignancies analyzed during the past seven years, 27 (2.4%) patients had karyotypically unrelated clones: 3.5% (7/202) of acute myeloid leukemias, 5.3% (11/206) of myelodysplastic syndromes, none of 40 acute lymphoblastic leukemias, 0.4% (1/233) of myeloproliferative disorders, and 2.6% (8/306) lymphoproliferative disorders with clonal chromosomal abnormalities. Twenty-five patients showed two unrelated clones and two had three unrelated clones. The most consistent chromosome abnormalities were del(5q) (seven cases), +8 (six cases), del(20q) (five cases), and del(7q), +12, +21, and -22 (three cases each). Of interest, the high frequency of different numeric or structural abnormalities affecting the same chromosomes in such clones supports the hypothesis that these karyotypically unrelated clones originate from the common malignant clone through submicroscopic molecular genetic changes and evolutionary processes.

Classical and molecular cytogenetic abnormalities and outcome of childhood acute myeloid leukaemia: report from a referral centre in Israel

The incidence of cytogenetic abnormalities in childhood de novo acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and its prognostic significance was assessed in an Israeli paediatric referral centre. Cytogenetic analysis was successful in 86 of 97 children (< 20 years of age) diagnosed between 1988 and 2002 with de novo AML. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis detected new information in 11 of them, leading to reassignment in cytogenetic group classification. The incidence of the various cytogenetic subgroups was as follows: normal - 9%; t(11q23) - 22%; t(8;21) - 13%; t(15;17) - 8%; inv(16) - 3.4%; abn(3q) - 4.6%; 7/7q-(sole or main) - 5.8%; del(9q)(sole) and +21(sole) - 4.6% each; t(8;16) - 2.3%; t(6;9), t(1;22), +8(sole) - 1.1% each; and miscellaneous - 18%. The overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) (4 years) for 94 patients treated with the modified Berlin-Frankfürt-Münster (BFM) AML protocols (non-irradiated) were 59.9% (SE = 5%) and 55.7% (SE = 5%), respectively, and for the favourable t(8;21), t(15;17) and inv(16), OS was 60% (SE = 15%), 83% (SE = 15%) and 100% respectively. For the normal group it was 62% (SE = 17%), miscellaneous 64% (SE = 12%), t(11q23) 44.6% (SE = 11%) and of the -7/7q-, del(9q)(sole) or t(6;9), none had survived at 4 years. The incidence of cytogenetic subgroups in the Israeli childhood AML population and their outcome were similar to other recently reported paediatric series. Cytogenetic abnormalities still carry clinical relevance for treatment stratification in the context of modern chemotherapy.

Cytogenetics, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction are necessary to clarify the various mechanisms leading to an MLL-AF10 fusion in acute myelocytic leukemia with 10;11 rearrangement

In acute myelocytic leukemia (AML), predominantly in AML M5a, a recurrent chromosome aberration involves 11q23/MLL and the short arm of chromosome 10. Molecular studies have shown that the AF10 gene at 10p12 is consistently a partner gene in cases with 10;11 rearrangement. A simple reciprocal translocation cannot lead to the known MLL-AF10 fusion transcript because the 3' part of the MLL gene is orientated to the telomere and the 3' part of the AF10 gene to the centromere. In a series of 1897 AML samples, 14 cases (0.74%) showed 10;11 rearrangements leading to a MLL-AF10 fusion transcript. These cases were analyzed in detail with G banding analyses, fluorescence in situ hybridization, and molecular investigation in a single center. Five different mechanisms of (10;11) rearrangements leading to a MLL-AF10 fusion transcript can be observed (i.e., reciprocal translocations, insertions of either 10p into 11q or 11q into 10p, as well as complex and cryptic rearrangements). Compared to translocations involving MLL and other partner genes, complex rearrangements are unique for MLL-AF10 fusions. This may result from the opposite orientation of MLL and AF10.

Different clones of t(1;12)/t(12;12) involving the ETV6 gene in a case of acute myeloid leukemia

We describe here a case of a 77-year-old Japanese man who developed acute myeloid leukemia (AML-M2). Chromosome analysis of the bone marrow blast cells showed 46,XY,del(7q) at onset, and after relapse, two clones, 46,XY,t(1;12) and 46,XY,del(7q),t(12;12), were present. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis confirmed that each clone with the 12p abnormality involved the ETV6 gene. These findings suggest that the ETV6 gene rearrangements in this case were apparently independent of contribution to leukemogenesis, because this cytogenetic aberration appeared as a secondary change. To our knowledge, this is the first report of two different clones with ETV6 gene rearrangements in the same patient.

Molecular cytogenetic analysis of 10;11 rearrangements in acute myeloid leukemia

MLLT10 (previously called AF10) is a moderately common MLL fusion partner predominantly occurring in acute monoblastic leukemia (AML-M5). 10;11 rearrangements require at least three breaks in order to generate an in-frame MLL-MLLT10 fusion as a result of the opposite orientations of both genes on the respective chromosome arms. In this study, we describe a detailed molecular cytogenetic analysis of MLL-MLLT10 positive 10;11 rearrangements in two patients. We observed an as yet unreported chromosomal mechanism with at least four breakpoints, leading to MLL-MLLT10 gene fusion in a 24-year-old male. An inversion of 11q13-q23 with a breakpoint in the MLL gene was followed by an additional break 3' of MLL prior to insertion of the 11q segment into MLLT10. In a second patient, a 37-year-old male with AML-M5b, molecular cytogenetic analysis of an apparent 10;11 reciprocal translocation showed an intrachromosomal inversion of 3'MLLT10followed by a reciprocal translocation between 10p12 and 11q23. Review of the literature showed that all cases were the result of an inversion of either 10p or 11q followed by translocation 10p;11q or insertion of the inverted segment into MLLT10 or MLL.

Near haploid childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia masked by hyperdiploid line: detection by fluorescence in situ hybridization

Near-haploid (<30 chromosomes) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is a rare and unique subgroup of childhood common ALL associated with a very poor outcome. It may be underdiagnosed when masked by a co-existing hyperdiploid line, which has to be distinguished from the common good-prognostic hyperdiploid (>50 chromosomes) ALL. We present three children in whom, by conventional cytogenetics, near-haploid ALL was detected on relapse. Using interphase FISH probes of chromosomes X, Y, 4, 12, and 21, we were able, in two cases, to trace the hidden near-haploid lines of approximately 5% and 20% of the cells, masked by hyperdiploid cells of approximately 80% and 70%, respectively; at relapse, the proportion was reversed, with predominant near-haploid lines of over 80% and residual hyperdiploidy of less than 10%. The near-haploid lines consisted of 24 and 27 chromosomes, and always retained the second copy of chromosome 21 or its derivative, as detected in one of our patients by SKY. The hyperdiploid clones were the exact duplicates of the near-haploid ones and contained four and two copies of the chromosomes represented in two and one copies in the near-haploid stem line, respectively. Unlike the common hyperdiploid ALL, no trisomies were observed. The patients were all aged >10 years, with WBC 0.7-30 x 10(9)/L, and a common ALL phenotype. They were treated with the ALL-BFM-95 protocol, medium risk group, and responded well to 8 days of steroid therapy, but relapsed early, within 11 months, and died a few months later. Interphase FISH technique is recommended for the detection of cryptic near-haploid clones in the diagnostic survey of ALL. To assess the prognostic value of near-haploidy in the context of the ALL-BFM protocols, a larger cohort of patients is required.