Safety of powered instrumentation for adenoidectomy

Adenoidectomy and persistent velopharyngeal insufficiency: Considerations, risk factors, and treatment

IMPORTANCE

Persistent velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI) is a rare but well-recognized complication of adenoidectomy. VPI can have a significant impact on the communication of a child.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the pathophysiology of post-adenoidectomy VPI, identify its associated risk factors, and illustrate the techniques used to treat the entity.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

A search of English or translated English articles concerning adenoidectomy, partial adenoidectomy, superior adenoidectomy; and velopharyngeal insufficiency, speech and voice from 1980 to 2021 was performed using Pubmed and Embase. Data from prospective and retrospective studies and their relevant references were pooled.

RESULTS

By objective measures, hypernasality is noted in many pediatric patients post-adenoidectomy, but this typically resolves in 3-6 months. Risk factors for the development of post-adenoidectomy VPI include low birth weight, family history of hypernasality, and history of speech problems or nasal regurgitation. The cleft palate, submucous cleft palate, poor palate mobility, and a deep pharynx may indicate susceptibility to VPI. Speech therapy is successful in up to 50% of patients, while surgical intervention may be tailored based on the diagnostic evaluation of the velopharynx with videofluoroscopy or nasoendoscopy.

CONCLUSION

We present a comprehensive review of the literature on the pathophysiology, risk factors, and treatment of post-adenoidectomy VPI. We hope to bring awareness to the factors that can lead to a rare but potentially devastating complication in one of the most common procedures performed by Otolaryngologists.

Comparison of transnasal and transoral routes of microdebrider combined curettage adenoidectomy and assessment of endoscopy for residue: a randomized prospective study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study is to investigate the frequency and locations of residual adenoid tissue in conventional curettage adenoidectomy (CA) via transnasal endoscopic examination at the end of the operation and to determine the most appropriate technique for residual adenoid tissue removal by transoral or transnasal microdebrider usage.

METHODS

Sixty-three patients aged 4-12 years who were scheduled for CA were included in this randomized prospective study in a tertiary reference center. Patients who underwent CA had the endoscopic residual tissue exploration at the end of surgery. The amount and locations of residual tissue were recorded. Patients with > 20% residual tissue were divided into two groups according to randomization list for removing the residual tissue, depending on the use of transoral microdebrider (TOMD) and transnasal microdebrider (TNMD). Two procedures were compared in terms of duration, bleeding, pain, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) transfer time, and complications.

RESULTS

Residual tissue was detected in 38 patients (60.2%). The most common location of residual tissue was peritubal area (41.3%). The TOMD group had lower surgical duration, blood loss, pain scores and shorter PACU transfer time (p = 0.001, p = 0.002, p˂0.001, and p = 0.006, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic exploration at the end of CA should be considered to avoid residual tissue retention. Furthermore, if residual tissue is present, the use of TOMD is easier, faster, and associated with lower morbidity than the use of TNMD.

Curettage adenoidectomy versus endoscopic microdebrider adenoidectomy in children: A randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Adenoidectomy is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedures with different techniques and technologies. Although curettage adenoidectomy (CA) has been practiced conventionally for many years, endoscopic microdebrider adenoidectomy (EMA) has emerged as an innovative surgical method. Comparing physiological effects, efficacy and safety of the endoscopic microdebrider adenoidectomy (EMA) and curettage adenoidectomy (CA) in pediatric population is aimed with this prospective, single-blind, randomized, controlled trial.

METHODS

Sixty pediatric patients with type-A tympanogram according to Jerger classification in both ears before surgery were randomly assigned to receive the CA (n = 30) and the EMA (n = 30). Tympanometry evaluation for each ear was performed the day before surgery firstly and was repeated on days 1, 7 and 14 after surgery. Intraoperative time, complications during and after the operation were recorded. Postoperative pain was also evaluated for 10 days postoperatively.

RESULTS

Tympanometric evaluation revealed significantly reduced middle ear peak pressure levels with the EMA than with the CA for each ear on day 1 after surgery and for only left ear on day 7 after surgery (P < 0.05). In addition, statistically significant reduced pain scores in postoperative first 3 days were related to the EMA (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the methods in terms of duration of surgery and complications.

CONCLUSION

According to findings from this study, the EMA procedure may be as safe and rapid as the CA. Furthermore, the EMA may be more controlled and less invasive to the surrounding tissues. Further studies are advised to support these data.

Coblation versus microdebrider in pediatric adenoidectomy

OBJECTIVE

To compare and contrast coblation and microdebrider with touch-up electrocautery (ME) for adenoidectomy in children.

METHODS

Patients <18 years old undergoing adenoidectomy without tonsillectomy were selected for this prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Participants were enrolled into one of two groups based on birth date: coblation or ME. The surgeons completed a standard survey about intraoperative factors for each method. Recovery nurses filled out a standardized survey postoperatively. A third standardized survey was completed via a phone interview with the parent or patient caregiver on postoperative day 3 to assess procedure outcomes. The survey results were then compared using ANOVA statistical analysis.

RESULTS

50 patients were enrolled in the coblation group and 51 were enrolled in the ME group. There was no significant difference in mean age between the coblation (4.96 years) and ME groups (4.58 years) (p = 0.525). The mean time (in minutes) for coblation (5.50) was significantly lower than ME (9.47) when controlling for the confounder: surgical site exposure (p < 0.001). The surgical time was significantly influenced by the quality of exposure/visualization (p = 0.037). The coblator method had significantly less intraoperative blood loss compared to ME (p < 0.001). There was a statistically significant difference between coblation (1.53) and ME (2.05) for days of pain (p = 0.045) when controlling for the confounder adenoid size.

CONCLUSION

In our study we found that coblation demonstrated significantly less intraoperative time and less blood loss, as well as a shorter duration of postoperative pain, when compared to ME for adenoidectomy.

Does Increased Electrocautery during Adenoidectomy Lead to Neck Pain?

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to assess the impact of electrocautery on complications in adenoidectomy. We sought to quantify cautery-related temperature changes in prevertebral fascia that may occur during the procedure, retrospectively evaluate the incidence of cautery-related complications, and prospectively assess the role of cautery in postoperative neck pain.

METHODS: Three consecutive related trials were performed. Initially, adenoidectomy was performed on 20 fresh cadavers, using a thermister to evaluate temperature changes in the prevertebral fascia after electrocautery (30 watts over a 30-second period). Next, retrospective analysis of adenoidectomy complications in 1206 children over a 5-year period was performed. Based on these findings, a prospective study of the incidence of neck pain following adenoidectomy was performed in a cohort of 276 children. Adenoidectomy technique, wattage, and duration of electro-cautery were recorded for each child. Children with significant neck pain were evaluated with MRI.

RESULTS: Peak thermister readings averaged 74°C, for a mean change of 51.8°C. Complications observed in retrospective analysis included neck pain (3), Grisel's syndrome (1), prolonged velopharyngeal insufficiency (1), retropharyngeal edema (1), and severe nasopharyngeal stenosis (1). The incidence of neck pain in the prospective study was 12% (33 pts), and was independent of adenoidectomy technique, cautery wattage, or duration of cautery use. MRIs revealed edema without abscess.

CONCLUSIONS: Cautery can result in substantial temperature changes in the surgical adenoid bed. Despite this, the incidence of complications, specifically neck pain, associated with adenoidectomy is low, although underreported. Complications appear to be independent of adenoidectomy technique and cautery use.

Adenoids in children: Advances in immunology, diagnosis, and surgery

Adenoids are strategically located for mediating local and regional immune functions as they are exposed to antigens from both the outside air and the alimentary tract. Recurrent or chronic respiratory infections can induce histomorphological and functional changes in the adenoidal immunological barrier, sometimes making surgical treatment necessary. Our aim in this review is to summarize the crucial points about not only the immunological histopathology of adenoidal tissue, especially in patients with adenoid hypertrophy, but also the most common and useful diagnostic techniques and surgical options.

Powered instrumentation for transnasal endoscopic partial adenoidectomy in children with submucosal cleft palate

OBJECTIVES

Partial adenoidectomy is the selective removal of the obstructing part of adenoid tissue, thus relieves obstruction symptoms and preserves the velopharyngeal valve action. Patients with palatal dysfunction are candidates for the technique. This study describes the use of microdebrider, transnasally (guided by the nasal endoscope) to perform partial adenoidectomy in patients with submucosal cleft palate, who presented with adenoidal hypertrophy and also it discusses its effects on nasal obstruction and speech.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This prospective study was carried out on twenty-three submucosal cleft palate patients who were referred to the ORL-HN department; Zagazig University Hospitals complaining of respiratory obstruction and sleep disturbances due to adenoids hypertrophy. After preoperative nasoendoscopic and speech evaluation, transnasal endoscopic, power-assisted partial adenoidectomy was done for all patients. All patients were followed up at regular visits including nasoendoscopy and speech evaluation.

RESULTS

The procedure insured fast, safe, reliable, under vision and well controlled steps. Intraoperatively no major complications were recorded. During follow up, nasal obstruction and respiratory obstruction symptoms were improved. Speech outcome results were reported.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrates the feasibility of using the microdebrider for performing transnasal partial adenoidectomy (under endoscopic guidance). The procedure is precise, rapid, safe and well-tolerated with the advantage of direct visualization of a traditionally difficult-to-expose area. The study reported improvement of respiratory obstruction symptoms with good speech results.

Comparison of transoral power-assisted endoscopic adenoidectomy to curettage adenoidectomy

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this prospective and randomized study was to compare patients who underwent curettage adenoidectomy (CA) or transoral power-assisted endoscopic adenoidectomy (PAEA) performed as isolated procedures by a single surgeon over a period of 7 years. The success of an adenoidectomy has been evaluated by assessing the amount of reduction in the adenoid size and the symptomatic improvement at the sixth postoperative month.

METHODS

Patients' nasal airway obstruction was graded by the parents of the patient on a visual analog scale (VAS), with a range from 0 to 10, with grade 10 representing total obstruction. The ratio of the choanal opening obstructed by an adenoid mass was measured and expressed in percentages as representative of the adenoid size. Preoperative and 6-month postoperative adenoid sizes were compared.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients (CA group 27 patients/PAEA group 26 patients) completed the study. In the CA group, VAS score improved from the preoperative score of 8.63 ± 0.88 to the 6-month score of 2.22 ± 1.01 (P < 0.0001); and in the PAEA group, the preoperative VAS score of 8.69 ± 0.84 improved to 2.08 ± 1.05 in the same period (P < 0.0001). No statistical significance was found when VAS score improvements were compared (P = 0.4569). The average ratio of choanal opening obstructed by an adenoid mass improved from the preoperative ratio of 89.41% ± 6.48% to the 6-month ratio of 7.85% ± 2.28% in the CA group; and the preoperative ratio of 90.19% ± 6.95% in the PAEA group improved to 3.65% ± 1.38% after 6 months. The reduction of adenoid size was significantly superior in PAEA than CA (P < 0.0001). The operative time in PAEA was significantly shorter than that in CA (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Although symptomatic improvement at the 6-month follow-up is statistically indifferent, PAEA has been shown to be superior to CA with its superior performance in providing a near-total elimination of the adenoid mass in a shorter operating time.

The evolution of the adenoidectomy: analysis of different power-assisted techniques

Techniques and instruments for adenoidectomy have considerably changed over the years. With the introduction in Otolaryngology of power-assisted instruments for endoscopic sinus surgery, the classic adenoidectomy performed with curette or adenotome has evolved, with an improved patients&#x0027; outcome and a better satisfaction of the surgeon. The purpose of this article is to describe and critically analyze the literature reports about different methods of power-assisted adenoidectomy. We performed a literature search (Medline) to identify all available reports. We discussed the surgical techniques and reviewed advantages and disadvantages of each method. The techniques can be schematically divided in non-endoscopic, usually performed with a laryngeal mirror, and endoscopic-assisted. The endoscopic control can be obtained either trans-nasally or trans-orally, as well as the microdebrider can be inserted in the nasal cavity or maneuvered through the oral cavity. Some authors reported the usage of the power-assisted instruments in performing the entire adenoidectomy; while, according with other authors, the microdebrider can be used as a step of the surgical procedure, for a combined adenoidectomy. In conclusion, all the methods seem to be safe and effective, and the personal experience of the surgeon should guide the choice of the instruments. However, we personally consider the endoscopic techniques as the most suitable, and among these the Transoral Endonasal-Controlled Combined Adenoidectomy (TECCA) should be considered as the most ergonomic technique to perform a power-assisted adenoidectomy.

How we do it: a combined method of traditional curette and power-assisted endoscopic adenoidectomy

CONCLUSION

After conventional curette adenoidectomy, a significant mass of residual adenoid tissue is observed in about 50% of the cases. The combined approach of conventional curette and endoscopic adenoidectomy with microdebrider assures a complete and accurate removal of the mass. It is an effective and safe method without significantly prolonging the operative time.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the surgical technique of conventional curette adenoidectomy completed with the microdebrider under endoscopic vision in case of residual adenoid tissue.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective review of 143 consecutive patients (age range 2-16 years, mean 6.2) who underwent endoscopic adenoidectomy for adenoid hypertrophy at an academic hospital-based institution. A classic transoral curette adenoidectomy was performed initially. Then a rigid fibre-optic endoscope was used transnasally to assess the completeness of surgery. Residual adenoid tissue was removed using a microdebrider under endoscopic vision.

RESULTS

After conventional curette adenoidectomy 70 children (48.9%) underwent residual adenoid tissue transnasal removal. Mean curette adenoidectomy time with endoscopic visualization of the nasopharynx was 9.1 min and, in the case of completion with the microdebrider, 14.6 min. No significant intraoperative bleeding, postoperative haemorrhage or other complications have occurred. After a mean follow-up of 24.4 months, no patients have been readmitted for symptoms of adenoid regrowth.

Blunt dissection versus electronic molecular resonance bipolar dissection for tonsillectomy: operative time and intraoperative and postoperative bleeding and pain

OBJECTIVE

To compare operative time, intraoperative and postoperative bleeding and pain using two different techniques for tonsillectomy: electronic molecular resonance bipolar tonsillectomy and blunt dissection tonsillectomy.

METHODS

From January 2005 to December 2006, a prospective, randomised study was performed in 800 children, aged from 3 to 10 years, admitted to the ENT (Ear Nose Throat) Unit of Giannina Gaslini Institute, Genoa, Italy to undergo tonsillectomy. Patients were randomised into two surgical groups, Group A (electronic molecular resonance tonsillectomy, EMRBT) and Group B (blunt dissection tonsillectomy). Operative time, intraoperative blood loss and postoperative complications were recorded. During 10 days after surgery, children and their parents were also asked to provide a rating of the patients' current pain intensity using a visual analogue scale. In this period, the parents were also asked to note the analgesic drugs administered.

RESULTS

Duration of surgery and blood loss were significantly much lower in the group undergoing electronic molecular resonance bipolar tonsillectomy (p<0.0001). Postoperative pain scores resulted significantly different between the two methods on days 5 (p=0.05) and 8 (p=0.001) in evaluations by mothers. Moreover, in evaluations by patients pain scores resulted significantly different between the two methods on days 3 (p=0.02), 8 (p=0.005) and 9 (p=0.01). We found no difference between boys and girls in pain scores in the 10 days considered, nor between children older than 5 yrs and children younger than or aged 5 years. No statistically significant differences between the two techniques were found in the use of analgesics in all postoperative evaluations.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the use of electronic molecular resonance bipolar tonsillectomy, compared to blunt dissection, has several advantages. Reduced operative time and intraoperative bleeding make EMRBT more cost effective and allow an increased number of operations. Concerning postoperative pain, the two techniques did not present significant differences in the use of analgesics. The number of postoperative bleeding episodes was also similar in the two groups of patients.

Safety of electronic molecular resonance adenoidectomy

Adenoidectomy is one of the most frequent operations in children. In order to reduce hospital stay costs, today, this procedure is performed as day surgery. Even though adenoidectomy is not considered risky, some minor complications may occur, the most important being bleeding (0.5-8% incidence). The surgical technique used can influence considerably postoperative pain and time to recovery. This aspect is essential in the management of day surgery patients, for whom the need of safe and rapid maneuvers associated with early recovery determines the choice of the surgical procedure. Recently, we developed a surgical technique based on the use of an electronic molecular resonance tool associated with bendable suction electrocautery. This study was carried out on 600 patients, divided into two groups, the first undergoing ablation using the molecular resonance tool and the second undergoing curette adenoidectomy. The two groups were homogeneous for age, sex, surgical indications, and grade of adenoid hypertrophy. The following parameters were considered: duration of surgery, importance of intraoperative bleeding, time to cicatrization, incidence of bleeding complications. Duration of surgery and intra- and postoperative bleeding were much lower in the first group than in the group undergoing traditional adenoidectomy. In addition, rhinopharyngeal complete cicatrization, defined as absolute absence of pseudomembrane, was much quicker in the first group, as assessed by postoperative endoscopy. Another major advantage offered by the molecular resonance tool is the accuracy of surgery performed under visual control in a practically bloodless field. To sum up, this method, thanks to its technical features and safety, is particularly indicated in children and in patients with coagulation disorders.

A survey on the management of reactionary haemorrhage following adenoidectomy in the UK and our practice

We present the results of a nation-wide survey in the management of reactionary haemorrhage following adenoidectomy, in the absence of specific national guidelines for this complication in the UK. We have reported the practice of the consultant members of the BAO-HNS through a confidential postal questionnaire with regard to their preferred method of management and experience. Valid replies were received from 285 ENT surgeons, of which 87.3% (249) prefer to manage reactionary haemorrhage with post-nasal packs and 223 (78.2%) would use an overnight post-nasal pack. 7.7% (22) use other techniques, and 9.1% (26) leave post-nasal packs for as short time as possible. Our experience of using a post-nasal pack for 4 h appears equally as effective as a post-nasal pack left for 24 h and reduces the discomfort and subsequent risks related to overnight post-nasal packing.

Value-based approach to power-assisted adenoidectomy

A recognized disadvantage of power-assisted adenoidectomy (PAA) is the increased patient charge associated with the disposable instrumentation. The elimination of pathological review of routine adenoid specimens may provide a means of offsetting the increased charge, as 1) unsuspected findings are rare, and 2) PAA specimens are too traumatized to provide the microscopic detail necessary to make an unsuspected diagnosis. The pathology reports of all adenoidectomy specimens removed over a 10-year period were reviewed and combined with previously published reviews in order to estimate the prevalence of unsuspected disease. The estimated prevalence of unsuspected diagnoses found by routine pathological review of adenoid specimens is 37 per 100,000 cases (95% confidence interval, 26-51). In a separate analysis, a pathologist blinded to the technique of adenoid removal assessed the tissue effects of curette adenoidectomy versus PAA. Significant tissue damage at the microscopic level was identified in 6 of 11 specimens removed with the power-assisted technique as compared to 0 of 11 specimens removed by curette (p = .03). Eliminating histopathologic review of routine adenoidectomy specimens can potentially offset the increased patient charge of PAA by 62%. Power-assisted adenoidectomy, however, should be avoided in nonroutine cases in which the potential for occult disease exists.

Endoscopic partial adenoidectomy for children with submucous cleft palate

OBJECTIVE

Children with submucous cleft palate who suffer from chronic nasal obstruction because of hypertrophic adenoids usually are not subjected to adenoidectomy because of the fear of postoperative velopharyngeal insufficiency. These patients present a therapeutic challenge because we are aware more than ever of the importance of normal nasal breathing and nocturnal respiration, especially during childhood. Our hypothesis was that transnasal endoscopic horizontal limited adenoidectomy may relieve nasal obstruction while preserving the function of the velopharyngeal valve. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of transnasal endoscopic horizontal partial adenoidectomy in patients with submucous cleft palate and adenoidal hypertrophy.

SETTING

Patients were either referred to the outpatient clinic of the Palate Surgery Unit (seven patients) or were patients referred to the senior author's (Y.F.) private clinic. All the patients had been operated on by this senior author (Y.F.).

PATIENTS

Ten children aged 3.5 to 13 years (six girls and four boys) with submucous cleft palate and hypertrophic adenoids were included in the study. All the patients were hyponasal and suffered nasal obstruction, loud snoring, and episodes of apnea.

INTERVENTIONS

Endoscopic partial adenoidectomy was accomplished to open the lower third of the choanae. Nasal breathing was achieved in all the patients, and only mild snoring remained in two patients. The hyponasality disappeared and speech intelligibility normalized. Mild hypernasality developed in two patients but was still perceived as an overall improvement in speech.

CONCLUSIONS

Transnasal endoscopic horizontal partial adenoidectomy may be an effective surgical method for relief of nasal obstruction while preserving velopharyngeal valve function in patients with submucous cleft palate who suffer from obstructive adenoids.