Identification of a gene in the euryarchaeal Thermococcus species AN1 encoding a protein homologous to the alpha subunit of the eukaryal signal recognition particle (SRP) receptor

The very early evolution of protein translocation across membranes

In this study, we used a computational approach to investigate the early evolutionary history of a system of proteins that, together, embed and translocate other proteins across cell membranes. Cell membranes comprise the basis for cellularity, which is an ancient, fundamental organizing principle shared by all organisms and a key innovation in the evolution of life on Earth. Two related requirements for cellularity are that organisms are able to both embed proteins into membranes and translocate proteins across membranes. One system that accomplishes these tasks is the signal recognition particle (SRP) system, in which the core protein components are the paralogs, FtsY and Ffh. Complementary to the SRP system is the Sec translocation channel, in which the primary channel-forming protein is SecY. We performed phylogenetic analyses that strongly supported prior inferences that FtsY, Ffh, and SecY were all present by the time of the last universal common ancestor of life, the LUCA, and that the ancestor of FtsY and Ffh existed before the LUCA. Further, we combined ancestral sequence reconstruction and protein structure and function prediction to show that the LUCA had an SRP system and Sec translocation channel that were similar to those of extant organisms. We also show that the ancestor of Ffh and FtsY that predated the LUCA was more similar to FtsY than Ffh but could still have comprised a rudimentary protein translocation system on its own. Duplication of the ancestor of FtsY and Ffh facilitated the specialization of FtsY as a membrane bound receptor and Ffh as a cytoplasmic protein that could bind nascent proteins with specific membrane-targeting signal sequences. Finally, we analyzed amino acid frequencies in our ancestral sequence reconstructions to infer that the ancestral Ffh/FtsY protein likely arose prior to or just after the completion of the canonical genetic code. Taken together, our results offer a window into the very early evolutionary history of cellularity.

The core Escherichia coli signal recognition particle receptor contains only the N and G domains of FtsY

Previous studies have proposed that the N-terminal A domain (approximately 200 amino acid residues) of the Escherichia coli signal recognition particle (SRP) receptor, FtsY, is required for membrane targeting. In contrast to this suggestion, we show that A domain-truncated versions of FtsY, harboring only domains N and G, are functional. Therefore, we propose that N and G domains constitute the core SRP receptor.

Sequencing, expression, characterisation and phylogeny of the ADP-dependent phosphofructokinase from the hyperthermophilic, euryarchaeal Thermococcus zilligii

The full-length gene encoding the ADP-dependent phosphofructokinase (PFK) from the euryarchaeal Thermococcus zilligii was cloned, using degenerate primer polymerase chain reaction (PCR) combined with inverse-PCR techniques, and ultimately expressed in Escherichia coli. The expressed enzyme was biochemically characterised and found to be similar to the native enzyme for most properties examined. Sequence database searches suggest that this unique ADP-PFK possesses a limited phylogenetic distribution with homologues being found only in the other euryarchaeta Methanococcus jannaschii, Methanosarcina mazei and closely related members of the order Thermococcales. A phylogenetic analysis suggests that a single ancestral gene diverged to form the glucokinase and PFK lineages of this unique sequence family. Thus, the PFK reaction, one of the defining enzymatic activities of the Embden-Meyerhof pathway, can now be represented by three separate sequence families, the well-known PFKA family exemplified by the primary E. coli ATP-PFK (E.C. 2.7.1.11) and its associated ATP- and pyrophosphate-dependent PFKs (EC.2.7.1.90), the PFKB family (E. coli PFK 2 encoded by the pfkB gene and its homologues) and the ADP-PFKs of the Euryarchaeota reported here.

New prospects in studying the bacterial signal recognition particle pathway

In vivo and in vitro studies have suggested that the bacterial version of the mammalian signal recognition particle (SRP) system plays an essential and selective role in protein biogenesis. The bacterial SRP system consists of at least two proteins and an RNA molecule (termed Ffh, FtsY and 4.5S RNA, respectively, in Escherichia coli). Recent evidence suggests that other putative bacterial-specific SRP components may also exist. In vitro experiments confirmed the expected basic features of the bacterial SRP system by demonstrating interactions among the SRP components themselves, between them and ribosomes, ribosome-linked hydrophobic nascent polypeptides or inner membranes. The availability of a conserved (and essential) bacterial SRP version has facilitated the implementation of powerful genetic and biochemical approaches for studying the cascade of events during the SRP-mediated targeting process in vivo and in vitro as well as the three-dimensional structures and the properties of each SRP component and complex.

Archaeal protein translocation crossing membranes in the third domain of life

Proper cell function relies on correct protein localization. As a first step in the delivery of extracytoplasmic proteins to their ultimate destinations, the hydrophobic barrier presented by lipid-based membranes must be overcome. In contrast to the well-defined bacterial and eukaryotic protein translocation systems, little is known about how proteins cross the membranes of archaea, the third and most recently described domain of life. In bacteria and eukaryotes, protein translocation occurs at proteinaceous sites comprised of evolutionarily conserved core components acting in concert with other, domain-specific elements. Examination of available archaeal genomes as well as cloning of individual genes from other archaeal strains reveals the presence of homologues to selected elements of the bacterial or eukaryotic translocation machines. Archaeal genomic searches, however, also reveal an apparent absence of other, important components of these two systems. Archaeal translocation may therefore represent a hybrid of the bacterial and eukaryotic models yet may also rely on components or themes particular to this domain of life. Indeed, considering the unique chemical composition of the archaeal membrane as well as the extreme conditions in which archaea thrive, the involvement of archaeal-specific translocation elements could be expected. Thus, understanding archaeal protein translocation could reveal the universal nature of certain features of protein translocation which, in some cases, may not be readily obvious from current comparisons of bacterial and eukaryotic systems. Alternatively, elucidation of archaeal translocation could uncover facets of the translocation process either not yet identified in bacteria or eukaryotes, or which are unique to archaea. In the following, the current status of our understanding of protein translocation in archaea is reviewed.

Assembly of archaeal signal recognition particle from recombinant components

Signal recognition particle (SRP) takes part in protein targeting and secretion in all organisms. Searches for components of archaeal SRP in primary databases and completed genomes indicated that archaea possess only homologs of SRP RNA, and proteins SRP19 and SRP54. A recombinant SRP was assembled from cloned, expressed and purified components of the hyperthermophilic archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus. Recombinant Af-SRP54 associated with the signal peptide of bovine pre-prolactin translated in vitro. As in mammalian SRP, Af-SRP54 binding to Af-SRP RNA required protein Af-SRP19, although notable amounts bound in absence of Af-SRP19. Archaeoglobus fulgidus SRP proteins also bound to full-length SRP RNA of the archaeon Methanococcus jannaschii, to eukaryotic human SRP RNA, and to truncated versions which corresponded to the large domain of SRP. Dependence on SRP19 was most pronounced with components from the same species. Reconstitutions with heterologous components revealed a significant potential of human SRP proteins to bind to archaeal SRP RNAs. Surprisingly, M.jannaschii SRP RNA bound to human SRP54M quantitatively in the absence of SRP19. This is the first report of reconstitution of an archaeal SRP from recombinantly expressed purified components. The results highlight structural and functional conservation of SRP assembly between archaea and eucarya.