Pathology of fatal perioperative myocardial infarction: implications regarding pathophysiology and prevention

Pathophysiological mechanisms underlying increased circulating cardiac troponin in noncardiac surgery: a narrative review

Assay-specific increases in circulating cardiac troponin are observed in 20-40% of patients after noncardiac surgery, depending on patient age, type of surgery, and comorbidities. Increased cardiac troponin is consistently associated with excess morbidity and mortality after noncardiac surgery. Despite these findings, the underlying mechanisms are unclear. The majority of interventional trials have been designed on the premise that ischaemic cardiac disease drives elevated perioperative cardiac troponin concentrations. We consider data showing that elevated circulating cardiac troponin after surgery could be a nonspecific marker of cardiomyocyte stress. Elevated concentrations of circulating cardiac troponin could reflect coordinated pathological processes underpinning organ injury that are not necessarily caused by ischaemia. Laboratory studies suggest that matching of coronary artery autoregulation and myocardial perfusion-contraction coupling limit the impact of systemic haemodynamic changes in the myocardium, and that type 2 ischaemia might not be the likeliest explanation for cardiac troponin elevation in noncardiac surgery. The perioperative period triggers multiple pathological mechanisms that might cause cardiac troponin to cross the sarcolemma. A two-hit model involving two or more triggers including systemic inflammation, haemodynamic strain, adrenergic stress, and autonomic dysfunction might exacerbate or initiate acute myocardial injury directly in the absence of cell death. Consideration of these diverse mechanisms is pivotal for the design and interpretation of interventional perioperative trials.

Locoregional Anesthesia Has Lower Risks of Cardiac Complications Than General Anesthesia After Prolonged Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

OBJECTIVES

Although general anesthesia is the primary anesthesia in endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), some studies suggest locoregional anesthesia could be a feasible alternative for eligible patients. However, most evidence was from retrospective studies and was subjected to an inherent selection bias that general anesthesia is often chosen for more complex and prolonged cases. To mitigate this selection bias, this study aimed to compare 30-day outcomes of prolonged, nonemergent, intact, infrarenal EVAR in patients undergoing locoregional or general anesthesia. In addition, risk factors associated with prolonged operative time in EVAR were identified.

DESIGN

Retrospective large-scale national registry study.

SETTING

American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted database from 2012 to 2022.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 4,075 out of 16,438 patients (24.79%) had prolonged EVAR. Among patients with prolonged EVAR, 324 patients (7.95%) were under locoregional anesthesia. There were 3,751 patients (92.05%) under general anesthesia, and 955 of them were matched to the locoregional anesthesia cohort.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients undergoing infrarenal EVAR were included. Exclusion criteria included age <18 years, emergency cases, ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, and acute intraoperative conversion to open. Only cases with prolonged operative times (>157 minutes) were selected. A 1:3 propensity-score matching was used to address demographics, baseline characteristics, aneurysm diameter, distant aneurysm extent, and concomitant procedures between patients under locoregional and general anesthesia. Thirty-day postoperative outcomes were assessed. Moreover, factors associated with prolonged EVAR were identified by multivariate logistic regression.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Except for general anesthesia contraindications, patients undergoing locoregional or general anesthesia exhibited largely similar preoperative characteristics. After propensity-score matching, patients under locoregional and general anesthesia had a lower risk of myocardial infarction (0.93% v 2.83%, p = 0.04), but comparable 30-day mortality (3.72% v 2.72%, p = 0.35) and other complications. Specific concomitant procedures, aneurysm anatomy, and comorbidities associated with prolonged EVAR were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Locoregional anesthesia can be a safe and effective alternative to general anesthesia, particularly in EVAR cases with anticipated complexity and prolonged operative times, as it offers the potential benefit of reduced cardiac complications. Risk factors associated with prolonged EVAR can aid in preoperative risk stratification and inform the decision-making process regarding anesthesia choice.

Assessment and Management of Ischaemic Heart Disease in Non-Cardiac Surgery

In the setting of non-cardiac surgery, cardiac complications contribute to over a third of perioperative deaths. With over 230 million major surgeries performed annually, and an increasing prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and ischaemic heart disease, the incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction is also rising. The recent European Society of Cardiology guidelines on cardiovascular risk in noncardiac surgery elevated practices aiming to identify those at most risk, including biomarker monitoring and stress testing. However the current evidence base on if, and how, the risk of cardiac events can be modified is lacking. This review focuses on patient, surgical and cardiac risk assessment, as well as exploring the data on perioperative revascularization and other risk-reduction strategies.

Sarcopenic Obesity as a Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Disease: An Underrecognized Clinical Entity

Sarcopenic obesity (SO) is a chronic condition and an emerging health challenge, in view of the growing elderly population and the obesity epidemic. Due to a lack of awareness among treating doctors and the non-specific nauture of the associated symptoms, SO remains grossly underdiagnosed. There is no consensus yet on a standard definition or diagnostic criteria for SO, which limits the estimation of the global prevalence of this condition. It has been linked to numerous metabolic derangements, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. The treatment of SO is multimodal and requires expertise across multiple specialties. While dietary modifications and exercise regimens have shown a potential therapeutic benefit, there is currently no proven pharmacological management for SO. However, numerous drugs and the role of bariatric surgery are still under trial, and have great scope for further research. This article covers the available literature regarding the definition, diagnostic criteria, and prevalence of SO, with available evidence linking it to CVD, metabolic disease and mortality, and an overview of current directives on management.

Antiplatelet therapy and long-term mortality in patients with myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery

BACKGROUNDS

Myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS) has recently been accepted as a common complication associated with increased mortality. However, little is known about the treatment of MINS. The aim of this study was to investigate an association between antiplatelet therapy and long-term mortality after MINS.

METHODS

From 2010 to 2019, patients with MINS, defined as having a peak high-sensitivity troponin I higher than 40 ng/L within 30 days after non-cardiac surgery, were screened at a tertiary centre. Patients were excluded if they had a history of coronary revascularisation before or during index hospitalisation. Clinical outcomes at 1 year were compared between patients with and without antiplatelet therapy at hospital discharge. The primary outcome was death, and the secondary outcome was major bleeding.

RESULTS

Of the 3818 eligible patients with MINS, 940 (24.6%) received antiplatelet therapy at hospital discharge. Patients with antiplatelet therapy had a significantly lower mortality at 1 year than those without antiplatelet therapy (7.5% vs 15.9%, adjusted HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.79, p<0.001). A risk of major bleeding at 1 year was not significantly different between the patients with and without antiplatelet therapy (6.6% vs 7.6%, adjusted HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.17, p=0.324). In propensity score-matched analysis of 886 pairs, patients with antiplatelet therapy had a significantly lower risk of 1-year mortality (adjusted HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.73, p<0.001) than those without antiplatelet therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with MINS, antiplatelet therapy at discharge was associated with decreased 1-year mortality.

Myocardial injury after major non-cardiac surgery evaluated with advanced cardiac imaging: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS) is a frequent complication caused by cardiac and non-cardiac pathophysiological mechanisms, but often it is subclinical. MINS is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, justifying the need to its diagnose and the investigation of their causes for its potential prevention.

METHODS

Prospective, observational, pilot study, aiming to detect MINS, its relationship with silent coronary artery disease and its effect on future adverse outcomes in patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery and without postoperative signs or symptoms of myocardial ischemia. MINS was defined by a high-sensitive cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) concentration > 14 ng/L at 48-72 h after surgery and exceeding by 50% the preoperative value; controls were the operated patients without MINS. Within 1-month after discharge, cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies were performed in MINS and control subjects. Significant coronary artery disease (CAD) was defined by a CAD-RADS category ≥ 3. The primary outcomes were prevalence of CAD among MINS and controls and incidence of major cardiovascular events (MACE) at 1-year after surgery. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of individual MACE components and mortality.

RESULTS

We included 52 MINS and 12 controls. The small number of included patients could be attributed to the study design complexity and the dates of later follow-ups (amid COVID-19 waves). Significant CAD by CCTA was equally found in 20 MINS and controls (30% vs 33%, respectively). Ischemic patterns (n = 5) and ischemic segments (n = 2) depicted by cardiac MRI were only observed in patients with MINS. One-year MACE were also only observed in MINS patients (15.4%).

CONCLUSION

This study with advanced imaging methods found a similar CAD frequency in MINS and control patients, but that cardiac ischemic findings by MRI and worse prognosis were only observed in MINS patients. Our results, obtained in a pilot study, suggest the need of further, extended studies that screened systematically MINS and evaluated its relationship with cardiac ischemia and poor outcomes. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03438448 (19/02/2018).

Cardiovascular imaging following perioperative myocardial infarction/injury

Patients developing perioperative myocardial infarction/injury (PMI) have a high mortality. PMI work-up and therapy remain poorly defined. This prospective multicenter study included high-risk patients undergoing major non-cardiac surgery within a systematic PMI screening and clinical response program. The frequency of cardiovascular imaging during PMI work-up and its yield for possible type 1 myocardial infarction (T1MI) was assessed. Automated PMI detection triggered evaluation by the treating physician/cardiologist, who determined selection/timing of cardiovascular imaging. T1M1 was considered with the presence of a new wall motion abnormality within 30 days in transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), a new scar or ischemia within 90 days in myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), and Ambrose-Type II or complex lesions within 7 days of PMI in coronary angiography (CA). In patients with PMI, 21% (268/1269) underwent at least one cardiac imaging modality. TTE was used in 13% (163/1269), MPI in 3% (37/1269), and CA in 5% (68/1269). Cardiology consultation was associated with higher use of cardiovascular imaging (27% versus 13%). Signs indicative of T1MI were found in 8% of TTE, 46% of MPI, and 63% of CA. Most patients with PMI did not undergo any cardiovascular imaging within their PMI work-up. If performed, MPI and CA showed high yield for signs indicative of T1MI.Trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02573532 .

Postoperative Myocardial Injury in Patients Classified as Low Risk Preoperatively Is Associated With a Particularly Increased Risk of Long-Term Mortality After Noncardiac Surgery

Background

Prior studies have shown an association between myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery (MINS) and all‐cause mortality in patients following noncardiac surgery. However, the association between preoperative risk assessments, Revised Cardiac Risk Index and American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, and postoperative troponin elevations and long‐term mortality is unknown.

Methods and Results

A retrospective chart review identified 548 patients who had a troponin I level drawn within 14 days of noncardiac surgery that required an overnight hospital stay. Patients aged 40 to 80 years with at least 2 cardiovascular risk factors were included, while those with trauma, pulmonary embolism, and neurosurgery were excluded. Kaplan–Meier survival and odds ratio (OR) with sensitivity/specificity analysis were performed to assess the association between preoperative risk and postoperative troponin elevation and all‐cause mortality at 1 year. Overall, 69%/31% were classified as low‐risk/high‐risk per the Revised Cardiac Risk Index and 66%/34% per American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Comparing the low‐risk versus high‐risk groups, preoperative risk assessment was not associated with either postoperative troponin elevation or 1‐year mortality. MINS portended a 1‐year mortality of OR, 3.9 (95% CI, 2.44–6.33) in the total population. Patients classified as low risk preoperatively with MINS had the highest risk of 1‐year mortality (OR, 9.6; 95% CI, 4.27–24.38), with a low prevalence of statin use.

Conclusions

Current preoperative risk stratification tools do not prognosticate the risk of postoperative troponin elevation and all‐cause mortality at 1 year. Interestingly, patients classified as low risk preoperatively with MINS had a markedly higher 1‐year mortality risk compared with the general population, and most of them are not taking a statin. Our results suggest that evaluating preoperatively low‐risk patients for MINS presents an opportunity for prognostication, risk reclassification, and initiating therapies such as statins to mitigate long‐term risk.

Effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on mortality and morbidity after non-cardiac surgery: meta-analysis

Background

Remote ischaemic preconditioning (RIPC) has been shown to have a protective role on vital organs exposed to reperfusion injury. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the effects of non-invasive RIPC on clinical and biochemical outcomes in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery

Methods

A systematic literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, and Cochrane databases was carried out in February 2020. RCTs investigating the effect of non-invasive RIPC in adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery were included. Meta-analyses and trial sequential analyses (TSAs) were performed on cardiovascular events, acute kidney injury, and short- and long-term mortality.

Results

Some 43 RCTs including 3660 patients were included. The surgical areas comprised orthopaedic, vascular, abdominal, pulmonary, neurological, and urological surgery. Meta-analysis showed RIPC to be associated with fewer cardiovascular events in non-cardiac surgery (13 trials, 1968 patients, 421 events; odds ratio (OR) 0.68, 95 per cent c.i. 0.47 to 0.96; P = 0.03). Meta-analyses of the effect of RIPC on acute kidney injury (12 trials, 1208 patients, 211 events; OR 1.14, 0.78 to 1.69; P = 0.50; I² = 9 per cent), short-term mortality (7 trials, 1239 patients, 65 events; OR 0.65, 0.37 to 1.12; P = 0.12; I² = 0 per cent), and long-term mortality (4 trials, 1167 patients, 9 events; OR 0.67, 0.18 to 2.55; P = 0.56; I² = 0 per cent) showed no significant differences for RIPC compared with standard perioperative care in non-cardiac surgery. However, TSAs showed that the required information sizes have not yet been reached.

Conclusion

Application of RIPC to non-cardiac surgery might reduce cardiovascular events, but not acute kidney injury or all-cause mortality, but currently available data are inadequate to confirm or reject an assumed intervention effect.

Non-cardiac surgery in patients with coronary artery disease: risk evaluation and periprocedural management

Perioperative cardiovascular complications are important causes of morbidity and mortality associated with non-cardiac surgery, particularly in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Although preoperative cardiac risk assessment can facilitate the identification of vulnerable patients and implementation of adequate preventive measures, excessive evaluation might lead to undue resource utilization and surgical delay. Owing to conflicting data, there remains some uncertainty regarding the most beneficial perioperative strategy for patients with CAD. Antithrombotic agents are the cornerstone of secondary prevention of ischaemic events but substantially increase the risk of bleeding. Given that 5-25% of patients undergoing coronary stent implantation require non-cardiac surgery within 2 years, surgery is the most common reason for premature cessation of dual antiplatelet therapy. Perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy, which necessitates concomitant evaluation of the individual thrombotic and bleeding risks related to both clinical and procedural factors, poses a recurring dilemma in clinical practice. Current guidelines do not provide detailed recommendations on this topic, and the optimal approach in these patients is yet to be determined. This Review summarizes the current data guiding preoperative risk stratification as well as periprocedural management of patients with CAD undergoing non-cardiac surgery, including those treated with stents.

Effects of beta-blocker therapy on mortality after elective colon cancer surgery: a Swedish nationwide cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Colon cancer surgery remains associated with substantial postoperative morbidity and mortality despite advances in surgical techniques and care. The trauma of surgery triggers adrenergic hyperactivation which drives adverse stress responses. We hypothesised that outcome benefits are gained by reducing the effects of hyperadrenergic activity with beta-blocker therapy in patients undergoing colon cancer surgery. This study aims to test this hypothesis.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

This is a nationwide study which includes all adult patients undergoing elective colon cancer surgery in Sweden over 10 years. Patient data were collected from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. The national drugs registry was used to obtain information about beta-blocker use. Patients were subdivided into exposed and unexposed groups. The association between beta-blockade, short-term and long-term mortality was evaluated using Poisson regression, Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES

Primary outcome of interest was 1-year all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included 90-day all-cause and 5-year cancer-specific mortality.

RESULTS

The study included 22 337 patients of whom 36.1% were prescribed preoperative beta-blockers. Survival was higher in patients on beta-blockers up to 1 year after surgery despite this group being significantly older and of higher comorbidity. Regression analysis demonstrated significant reductions in 90-day deaths (IRR 0.29, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.35, p<0.001) and a 43% risk reduction in 1-year all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.63, p<0.001) in beta-blocked patients. In addition, cancer-specific mortality up to 5 years after surgery was reduced in beta-blocked patients (adjusted HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.88, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative beta-blockade is associated with significant reductions in postoperative short-term and long-term mortality following elective colon cancer surgery. Its potential prophylactic effect warrants further interventional studies to determine whether beta-blockade can be used as a way of improving outcomes for this patient group.

Type 2 Myocardial Infarction: JACC Review Topic of the Week

Acute myocardial infarction (MI) can occur from increased myocardial oxygen demand and/or reduced supply in the absence of acute atherothrombotic plaque disruption; a condition called type 2 myocardial infarction (T2MI). As with any MI subtype, there must be clinical evidence of myocardial ischemia to make the diagnosis. This condition is increasingly diagnosed due to the increasing sensitivity of cardiac troponin assays and is associated with adverse short-term and long-term prognoses. Limited data exist defining optimal management strategies because T2MI is a heterogeneous entity with varying etiologies and triggers. Thus, these patients require individualized care. A major barrier is the absence of a uniform definition that can be operationalized with high reproducibility. This document provides a synthesis of the data about T2MI to assist clinicians' understanding of its pathobiology, when to deploy the diagnosis, and its associated treatments. It also clarifies prognosis, identifies gaps in knowledge, and provides recommendations for moving forward.

Preoperative biomarker evaluation for the prediction of cardiovascular events after major vascular surgery

OBJECTIVE

The cause of perioperative myocardial infarction (PMI) is postulated to involve hemodynamic stress or coronary plaque destabilization. We aimed to evaluate perioperative factors in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) undergoing major vascular surgery to determine the likely mechanisms and predictors of PMI.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study of 133 patients undergoing major vascular surgery including open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair (n = 40) and major suprainguinal or infrainguinal arterial bypasses (non-AAA; n = 93). Preoperative assessment with history, physical examination, and peripheral artery tonometry was performed in addition to plasma sampling of biomarkers associated with inflammation and coronary plaque instability. The primary outcome was occurrence of a 30-day cardiovascular event (CVE; composite of PMI [troponin I elevation >99th percentile reference of ≥0.1 μg/L], stroke, or death).

RESULTS

Of 133 patients, 36 patients (27%) developed a 30-day CVE after vascular surgery, and all were PMI. Patients with 30-day CVE were older (75 ± 8 years vs 69 ± 10 years, mean ± standard deviation; P = .001), had higher prevalence of hypertension (94% vs 79%; P = .01) and preoperative beta-blocker therapy (50% vs 29%; P = .02), and had longer duration of surgery (5.1 ± 1.8 hours vs 4.0 ± 1.1 hours; P < .0001). Significant elevations in cystatin C, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), troponin I, high-sensitivity troponin T, matrix metalloproteinase 3, and osteoprotegerin occurred in those who developed 30-day CVE (all P < .05). Multivariate binary logistic regression identified AAA surgery and log-transformed NT-proBNP to be independent preoperative predictors of 30-day CVE (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with peripheral artery disease undergoing major vascular surgery, the likely mechanism of PMI appears to be the hemodynamic stress related to the type and duration of surgery. NT-proBNP was a useful independent predictor of CVE and thus may serve as an important biomarker of cardiovascular fitness for surgery.

Prevalence and risk factors of subclinical coronary artery disease in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is closely associated with carotid artery stenosis in the context of systemic arteriosclerosis, and it is a known perioperative risk factor for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). We aimed to evaluate the prevalence and risk factors of subclinical CAD in patients without known CAD undergoing CEA.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study conducted between January 2013 and December 2016. Among the patients scheduled for elective CEA, 69 with no medical history of CAD and no clinical symptoms (mean age, 76.4±7.8 years; 71.0% men) underwent coronary computed tomography (CT). Coronary angiography (CAG) and subsequent fractional flow reserve (FFR) estimation were performed if necessary. Subclinical CAD was defined as newly found significant coronary lesions after coronary CT screening. Significant coronary lesions were defined as lesions that showed total or subtotal occlusion on coronary CT, had ≥75% stenosis on CAG, or had FFR≤0.80 in major coronary arteries.

RESULTS

The prevalence of subclinical CAD was 17.4% (12 of 69 patients). Among the patient characteristics assessed, only high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) levels were significantly different between patients with and those without subclinical CAD (45.8±10.1 vs. 59.7±16.7 mg/dL, P=0.0072). A multivariate analysis revealed that low HDL-C levels were independent risk factors for subclinical CAD after adjusting for possible confounders (adjusted odds ratio: 0.91, 95% confidence interval: 0.84-0.98, P=0.0099).

CONCLUSIONS

Subclinical CAD is a common finding and is associated with low HDL-C in patients without known CAD undergoing CEA.

Elevated Presepsin Is Associated With Perioperative Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Complications in Elevated-Risk Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery: The Leukocytes and Cardiovascular Perioperative Events Study

BACKGROUND

Perioperative major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) are incompletely understood, and risk prediction is imprecise. Atherogenic leukocytes are crucial in cardiovascular events. However, it is unclear if surgical interventions affect leukocyte counts or activation status. Therefore, we investigated whether noncardiac surgery in patients with elevated cardiovascular risk is associated with changes in atherogenic leukocyte subsets and if these changes are related to perioperative MACCEs.

METHODS

We enrolled 40 patients in this single-center prospective observational cohort study. Total leukocytes and subpopulations, including classical, intermediate, and nonclassical monocytes and natural killer and regulatory T cells, were quantified before surgery, at 2 and 6 hours after skin incision, and at postoperative days 1 and 2 (POD1+2). The monocyte activation marker presepsin (sCD14-ST) was measured post hoc to determine differentiation of classical to nonclassical monocytes. We evaluated presepsin for prediction of the composite primary end point MACCE (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, myocardial ischemia, and stroke) at 30 days. Its additive value to risk assessment based on high-sensitive cardiac troponin T and N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was analyzed.

RESULTS

We evaluated 38 patients, of whom 5 (13%) reached MACCE. In the entire cohort, classical monocytes continuously increased and peaked at POD1 (0.35 [0.23-0.43] cells per nanoliter blood [nL] vs 0.45 [0.31-0.66] cells·nL, preoperative [pre-OP] vs POD1, P = .002). Intermediate monocytes doubled by POD1 (0.017 [0.013-0.021] vs 0.036 [0.022-0.043] cells·nL, pre-OP versus POD1, P = .0003). Nonclassical monocytes decreased (0.022 [0.012-0.032] vs 0.012 [0.005-0.023] cells·nL, pre-OP vs 6 hours, P = .003). In our patient population, we did not detect changes in any of the other predefined leukocyte subsets investigated. In patients experiencing a MACCE, classical monocyte expansion was reduced (0.081 [-0.16 to 0.081] cells·nL vs 0.179 [0.081 to 0.292] cells·nL, MACCE versus non-MACCE, P = .016). Patients in the event group presented with elevated pre-OP presepsin (1528 [406-1897] pg·mL vs 123 [82.2-174] pg·mL, MACCE versus non-MACCE, P = .0001). Presepsin was associated with MACCE (area under the curve = 0.964, [0.846-0.998], P = .001). Presepsin above the calculated threshold >184 pg·mL was superior to high-sensitive cardiac troponin T for improvement of NT-proBNP-based risk prediction (28 [74%] vs 22 [58%] correctly classified patients, P = .014).

CONCLUSIONS

Noncardiac surgery was associated with an increase in atherogenic leukocyte subsets. In a post hoc analysis, elevated pre-OP presepsin was associated with MACCE and improved NT-proBNP-based risk assessment. After validation in an independent data set, a presepsin cutoff of 184 pg·mL might qualify to complement NT-proBNP-based risk prediction, thereby increasing the proportion of correctly identified high-risk patients.

Etiology of Acute Coronary Syndrome after Noncardiac Surgery

BACKGROUND

The objective of this investigation was to determine the etiology of perioperative acute coronary syndrome with a particular emphasis on thrombosis versus demand ischemia.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, adult patients were identified who underwent coronary angiography for acute coronary syndrome within 30 days of noncardiac surgery at a major tertiary hospital between January 2008 and July 2015. Angiograms were independently reviewed by two interventional cardiologists who were blinded to clinical data and outcomes. Acute coronary syndrome was classified as ST-elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, or unstable angina; myocardial infarctions were adjudicated as type 1 (plaque rupture), type 2 (demand ischemia), or type 4b (stent thrombosis).

RESULTS

Among 215,077 patients screened, 146 patients were identified who developed acute coronary syndrome: 117 were classified as non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (80.1%); 21 (14.4%) were classified as ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and 8 (5.5%) were classified as unstable angina. After coronary angiography, most events were adjudicated as demand ischemia (type 2 myocardial infarction, n = 106, 72.6%) compared to acute coronary thrombosis (type 1 myocardial infarction, n = 37, 25.3%) and stent thrombosis (type 4B, n = 3, 2.1%). Absent or only mild, nonobstructive coronary artery disease was found in 39 patients (26.7%). In 14 patients (9.6%), acute coronary syndrome was likely due to stress-induced cardiomyopathy. Aggregate 30-day and 1-yr mortality rates were 7 and 14%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The dominant mechanism of perioperative acute coronary syndrome in our cohort was demand ischemia. A subset of patients had no evidence of obstructive coronary artery disease, but findings were consistent with stress-induced cardiomyopathy.

Myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery-incidence and predictors from a prospective observational cohort study at an Indian tertiary care centre

Asymptomatic myocardial injury following noncardiac surgery (MINS) is an independent predictor of 30-day mortality and may go unrecognized based on standard diagnostic definition for myocardial infarction (MI). Given lack of published research on MINS in India, our study aims to determine incidence of MINS in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery at our tertiary care hospital, and evaluate the clinical characteristics including 30-day outcome.The prospective observational study included patients >65 years or >45 years with either hypertension (HTN), diabetes mellitus (DM), coronary artery disease (CAD), cerebrovascular accident (CVA), or peripheral arterial disease undergoing noncardiac surgery. MINS was peak troponin level of ≥0.03 ng/dL at 12-hour or 24-hour postoperative. All patients were followed for 30 days postoperatively. Predictors of MINS and mortality were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression. Patients categorized based on peak troponin cut-off values determined by receiver operating characteristic curve were analyzed by Kaplan-Meir test to compare the survival of patients between the groups.Among 1075 patients screened during 34-month period, the incidence of MINS was 17.5% (188/1075). Patients with DM, CAD, or who underwent peripheral nerve block anaesthesia were 1.5 (P < .01), 2 (P < .001), and 12 (P < .001) times, respectively, more likely to develop MINS than others. Patients with heart rates ≥96 bpm before induction of anesthesia were significantly associated with MINS (P = .005) and mortality (P = .02). The 30-day mortality in MINS cohort was 11.7% (22/188, 95% CI 7.5%-17.2%) vs 2.5% (23/887, 95% CI 1.7%-3.9%) in patients without MINS (P < .001). ECG changes (P = .002), peak troponin values >1 ng/mL (P = .01) were significantly associated with mortality. A peak troponin cut-off of >0.152 ng/mL predicted mortality among MINS patients at 72% sensitivity and 58% specificity. Lack of antithrombotic therapy following MINS was independent predictor of mortality (P < .001), with decreased mortality in patients who took post-op ASA (Aspirin) or Clopidogrel. Mortality among MINS patients with post-op ASA intake is 6.7% vs 12.1% among MINS patients without post-op ASA intake. Mortality among MINS patients with post-op Clopidogrel intake is 10.5% vs 11.8% among MINS patients without post-op Clopidogrel intake.A higher (17.5%, 95% CI 15-19%) incidence of MINS was observed in our patient cohort with significant association with 30-day mortality. Serial postoperative monitoring of troponin following noncardiac surgery as standard of care, would identify "at risk" patients translating to improved outcomes.

Prevalence and predictors of myocardial ischemia by preoperative myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery

BACKGROUND

The prevalence and predictors of myocardial ischemia before noncardiac surgery are unknown. In addition the predictive value of myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) before noncardiac in individual patients is uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the prevalence and predictors of myocardial ischemia before noncardiac surgery, and determine the postoperative cardiac outcome based on results of myocardial perfusion SPECT.

DESIGN

Retrospective.

SETTING

Single tertiary care center.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We reviewed the records of adult patients diagnosed with myocardial ischemia by myocardial perfusion SPECT who were undergoing noncardiac surgery. Myocardial perfusion SPECT had been performed within 4 weeks prior to noncardiac surgery requiring general anesthesia.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prevalence of abnormal myocardial perfusion SPECT results on preoperative evaluation; abnormal myocardial perfusion SPECT results as a predictor for postoperative cardiac events such as cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and unstable angina.

RESULTS

Of 131 patients who underwent noncardiac surgery from February 2015 to April 2016, 84 (64%) patients were female and the mean (SD) age was 64.1 (13.6) years. The prevalence of abnormal myocardial perfusion SPECT was 18% (24 of 131). Normal myocardial perfusion SPECT was highly predictive (up to 100%), but a positive myocardial perfusion SPECT had low positive predictive value (4%). Variables associated with an abnormal myocardial perfusion SPECT included ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, ASA score of 3 or more, limited exercise capacity (less than 4 METs), male sex, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, smoking, and abnormal ECG. In a multivariable analysis, history of ischemic heart disease and history of smoking were significant predictors of abnormal myocardial perfusion SPECT (P=.001, and .029, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Because of the low positive predictive value of myocardial perfusion SPECT, utilization of the technique in the workup of cardiac patients undergoing noncardiac surgery has been inappropriate. Myocardial perfusion SPECT should be restricted to only clearly defined appropriate use criteria.

LIMITATIONS

Relatively small number of patients and retrospective design.

Role of prophylactic coronary revascularisation in improving cardiovascular outcomes during non-cardiac surgery: A narrative review

Coronary revascularisation has been a topic of debate for over three decades in patients undergoing high-risk non-cardiac surgery. The paradigm shifted from routine coronary angiography toward stress test guided decision-making based on larger randomised trials. However, this paradigm is challenged by relatively newer data where routine coronary angiography and revascularisation is shown to improve perioperative cardiovascular outcomes. We review major studies performed over a long period including more contemporary data with regard to the 2014 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association as well as 2014 European Society of Cardiology guideline on perioperative cardiovascular evaluation of patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery.

Perioperative Statin Treatment: Can it Decrease Postsurgical Cardiac Event Risk in Noncardiac Surgery?

Cardiac events are an important cause of postsurgical morbidity and mortality. Statin drugs have been studied as potentially risk-modifying agents in perioperative medicine. They have been shown to confer a protective benefit in cardiac surgery, but the evidence available in noncardiac surgery patient populations remains less conclusive. We hypothesized that perioperative statin treatment would be associated with lower incidence of postsurgical cardiac events (PSCEs) after major noncardiac surgery. A retrospective cohort study included 21,637 major noncardiac surgeries. Statin treatment was the exposure of interest and PSCE was the primary outcome measure. Data collection included patient age, body mass index, smoking status, diabetic status, cardiac event history, statin treatment history, and PSCE diagnoses. Perioperative statin treatment occurred in 4176 cases (19.3%). PSCEs occurred in 50 cases (0.23%), 29 in the untreated control group (0.17%) and 21 in the statin treatment group (0.50%). Relative risk in the untreated group was 0.3303 (95% confidence interval = 0.1886, 0.5786). This implied that statin-treated patients had higher risk than the untreated group. However, a logistic regression model that accounted for observed cardiac disease risk factors showed statin treatment not to be a significant predictor of PSCE in this sample. Analysis repeated in high-risk subsets of the cohort yielded similar results. A propensity score matching method that minimized differences between study groups also failed to demonstrate a significant association between statin treatment and PSCE risk. Our study did not demonstrate a significant association between perioperative statin treatment and PSCEs after major noncardiac surgery.

Chronic Antiplatelet Use Associated With Increased Blood Loss in Lumbar Spinal Surgery Despite Adherence to Protocols

There are conflicting reports regarding postoperative bleeding risks associated with discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy at least 7 days preoperatively. Most of the studies in the spine literature are based on surveys or anecdotal evidence. The majority of surgeons discontinue therapy 7 days preoperatively, but this varies widely from 5 to 21 days. The purpose of this retrospective study was to assess whether chronic antiplatelet use is associated with increased intraoperative blood loss, need for transfusion, and perioperative complications. Of 454 patients who underwent elective lumbar spinal surgery, 85 were on antiplatelet therapy and 369 were not. All patients stopped antiplatelet therapy at least 7 days preoperatively with approval from their cardiologist or primary care provider. Multiple regression analysis was performed and corrected for age, sex, antiplatelet therapy, number of levels decompressed/fused/instrumented, preoperative hematocrit, and postoperative hematocrit. Results showed that preoperative antiplatelet therapy, despite at least 7 days of discontinuation, is a statistically significant predictor (P=.04) of increased intraoperative blood loss. Blood transfusion was not associated with antiplatelet use but was associated with the number of levels fused, age, and low preoperative hematocrit (all P<.01). There were no recorded complications in either group. The authors conclude that antiplatelet therapy is associated with an increased risk of intraoperative blood loss in spine patients despite discontinuation at least 7 days preoperatively, but the clinical significance of this is unclear given the lack of association with blood transfusions and perioperative complications. [Orthopedics. 2016; 39(4):e695-e700.].

Statin Use Is Associated with Reduced All-Cause Mortality after Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair

It has been shown that preoperative statin therapy reduces all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients undergoing major noncardiac vascular surgery. In this report, we investigated the influence of statin use on early and late outcome following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR).

The study population, consisting of patients collated in the EUROSTAR registry, was stratified in two groups according to statin use. Baseline characteristics between the two groups were compared by chi-square and Wilcoxon rank sum tests for discrete and continuous variables. The effects of statin use on outcomes after EVAR were analyzed by multivariate regression models.

Of the 5,892 patients enrolled in the EUROSTAR registry, 731 (12.4%) patients used statins for hyperlipidemia. Statin users were younger, were more obese, and had a higher prevalence of diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and hypertension. After 5 years of follow-up, the cumulative survival rate was 77% for nonusers of statin versus 81% for statin users ( p = .005). After adjustment for age and other risk factors, statin use was still an independent predictor of improved survival ( p = .03).

Our results revealed that statin prescription was more frequent in younger patients. However, when adjusted for age and medical risk factors, the use of statin in patients who underwent EVAR was still independently associated with reduced overall mortality.

Coronary Angiography and Revascularization Prior to Noncardiac Surgery

OPINION STATEMENT

The role of coronary angiography and revascularization, including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) prior to noncardiac surgery remains poorly defined. The goal of preoperative angiography and PCI is improved risk stratification and ideally risk reduction of postoperative cardiovascular events, such as myocardial infarction (MI). By current guidelines, these procedures should be performed sparingly in high-risk stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients and routinely in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Anatomic assessment of CAD by routine invasive angiography is discouraged, although noninvasive assessment may soon be possible. As prior trials have failed to show a clear benefit in outcomes, PCI should only be considered in patients with high-risk anatomic features. The ideal management of other anatomic disease discovered by angiography is currently unknown. Limited registry data suggest that PCI is used more frequently than recommended, although the features of these procedures remain poorly elaborated. In patients who do undergo preoperative PCI, careful attention must be paid to patient-specific factors including the nature and urgency of surgery and duration of dual antiplatelet therapy. In summary, substantial evidence gaps warrant further research in this important area.

Cardiac and renal protective effects of dexmedetomidine in cardiac surgeries: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Cardiac and renal injuries are common insults after cardiac surgeries that contribute to perioperative morbidity and mortality. Dexmedetomidine has been shown to protect several organs against ischemia/reperfusion-(I/R) induced injury. We performed a randomized controlled trial to assess the effect of dexmedetomidine on cardiac and renal I/R injury in patients undergoing cardiac surgeries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgeries were randomized to dexmedetomidine group that received a continuous infusion of dexmedetomidine initiated 5 min before cardiopulmonary bypass (1 μg/kg over 15 min, followed by 0.5 μg/kg/h) until 6 h after surgery, whereas the control group received an equivalent volume of physiological saline. Primary outcome measures included myocardial-specific proteins (troponin-I, creatine kinase-MB), urinary-specific kidney proteins (N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase, alpha-1-microglobulin, glutathione transferase-pi, glutathione transferase alpha), serum proinflammatory cytokines (tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-1 beta), norepinephrine, and cortisol levels. They were measured within 5 min of starting anesthesia (T₀), at the end of surgery (T₁), 12 h after surgery (T₂), 24 h after surgery (T₃), 36 h postoperatively (T₄), and 48 h postoperatively (T₅). Furthermore, creatinine clearance and serum cystatin C were measured before starting surgery as a baseline, and at days 1, 4, 7 after surgery.

RESULTS

Dexmedetomidine reduced cardiac and renal injury as evidenced by lower concentration of myocardial-specific proteins, kidney-specific urinary proteins, and pro-inflammatory cytokines. Moreover, it caused higher creatinine clearance and lower serum cystatin C.

CONCLUSION

Dexmedetomidine provided cardiac and renal protection during cardiac surgery.

Acute perioperative-stress-induced increase of atherosclerotic plaque volume and vulnerability to rupture in apolipoprotein-E-deficient mice is amenable to statin treatment and IL-6 inhibition

Myocardial infarction and stroke are frequent after surgical procedures and consume a considerable amount of benefit of surgical therapy. Perioperative stress, induced by surgery, is composed of hemodynamic and inflammatory reactions. The effects of perioperative stress on atherosclerotic plaques are ill-defined. Murine models to investigate the influence of perioperative stress on plaque stability and rupture are not available. We developed a model to investigate the influence of perioperative stress on plaque growth and stability by exposing apolipoprotein-E-deficient mice, fed a high cholesterol diet for 7 weeks, to a double hit consisting of 30 min of laparotomy combined with a substantial blood loss (approximately 20% of total blood volume; 400 µl). The innominate artery was harvested 72 h after the intervention. Control groups were sham and baseline controls. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and serum amyloid A (SAA) plasma levels were determined. Plaque load, vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) and macrophage content were quantified. Plaque stability was assessed using the Stary score and frequency of signs of plaque rupture were assessed. High-dose atorvastatin (80 mg/kg body weight/day) was administered for 6 days starting 3 days prior to the double hit. A single dose of an IL-6-neutralizing antibody or the fusion protein gp130-Fc selectively targeting IL-6 trans-signaling was subcutaneously injected. IL-6 plasma levels increased, peaking at 6 h after the intervention. SAA levels peaked at 24 h (n=4, P<0.01). Plaque volume increased significantly with the double hit compared to sham (n=8, P<0.01). More plaques were scored as complex or bearing signs of rupture after the double hit compared to sham (n=5-8, P<0.05). Relative VSMC and macrophage content remained unchanged. IL-6-inhibition or atorvastatin, but not blocking of IL-6 trans-signaling, significantly decreased plaque volume and complexity (n=8, P<0.01). Using this model, researchers will be able to further investigate the pathophysiology of perioperative plaque stability, which can result in myocardial infarction, and, additionally, to test potential protective strategies.

Summary: We developed a model to study the dynamics of atherosclerotic plaque growth and stability following surgery, and show that IL-6 inhibition and statins beneficially affect plaque volume and complexity.

Role of aspirin for prevention and treatment of perioperative cardiovascular events

Among adults undergoing non-cardiac surgery who are at risk of a myocardial infarction, a long-standing question has been whether these patients should receive aspirin throughout the perioperative period. A large (n = 10,010 patients) international trial (POISE-2) demonstrated that perioperative aspirin did not prevent myocardial infarction, and the result was consistent both for patients who had been taking aspirin before the trial (continuation stratum, 4382 patients) and for patients who had not been taking aspirin before the trial (initiation stratum, 5628 patients). Aspirin did, however, increase the risk of major bleeding. Therefore, the best evidence does not support the use of aspirin for the prevention of myocardial infarction in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. In patients who have an indication for long-term aspirin usage and have their aspirin held during the perioperative period, it is important to ensure aspirin is restarted after the high-risk period for bleeding has passed (i.e., 8-10 days after surgery).

Preoperative Rosuvastatin Protects Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery

Objectives: We explored whether preoperative rosuvastatin could protect the cardiac health of patients with coronary artery disease undergoing emergency, noncardiac surgery. Methods: We randomized 550 noncardiac emergency surgery patients with stable coronary artery disease on long-term statin therapy to treatment with and without preoperative rosuvastatin. All patients received rosuvastatin after surgery. We evaluated the incidence of myocardial necrosis and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) 30 days and 6 months after surgery. Results: Creatinine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB) isoform elevations occurred less frequently 12 and 24 h after noncardiac emergency surgery in the experimental group than in the control group (p = 0.029). After surgery, the incidence of MACCE was also lower in the experimental group than in the control group (p = 0.019). The difference was mainly due to the incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction (p = 0.029). Multivariable analysis found that rosuvastatin reload reduced the incidence of MACCE 52% 6 months after surgery (p = 0.03). Conclusions: Preoperative rosuvastatin reload therapy decreases the incidence of myocardial necrosis and MACCE after noncardiac emergency surgery in patients with stable coronary artery disease on long-term statin therapy.

Non-cardiac surgery after percutaneous coronary intervention

Perioperative management of patients after percutaneous coronary intervention presents physicians with unique challenges and dilemmas. Although newer generation drug-eluting stents, transcatheter-based therapies, and minimally invasive surgical techniques have changed the medical landscape, guidelines for managing perioperative patients after percutaneous intervention are based largely on expert opinion and inconsistent data from an earlier era. In conclusion, the aims of this review are to summarize the data pertinent to managing patients after percutaneous coronary intervention in the perioperative period and to explore future perspectives.

Perioperative clinical variables and long-term survival following vascular surgery

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Coronary artery disease (CAD) is highly prevalent, and often times coexist, in patients with PAD. The management of patients with PAD that requires a high-risk vascular surgical procedure for intermittent claudication, critical limb ischemia or expanding abdominal aortic aneurysm requires risk stratification with the revised cardiac risk index, optimization of medical therapies, and limited use of cardiac imaging prior to surgery. Preventive revascularization in patients with stable CAD, with the sole intention to mitigate the risk of cardiac complications in the peri-operative period, is not effective and may be associated with significant bleeding and thrombotic risks, in particular if stents are used. A strategy of universal use of cardiac troponins in the perioperative period for active surveillance of myocardial ischemia may be more reasonable and cost-effective than the current standard of care of widespread use of cardiac imaging prior to high-risk surgery. An elevated cardiac troponin after vascular surgery is predictive of long-term mortality risk. Medical therapies such as aspirin and statins are recommended for patients with post-operative myocardial ischemia. Ongoing trials are assessing the role of novel anticoagulants. Additional research is needed to define the role of cardiac imaging and invasive angiography in this population.