Pilot study of natural human interleukin-2 in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Immunomodulatory and antiviral effects

Low-Dose Interleukin-2 Therapy: Fine-tuning Treg in Solid Organ Transplantation?

Regulatory T cells (Treg), a subset of CD4+ T cells, are potent regulators of immune reactions, which have been shown to be a promising therapeutic alternative to toxic immunosuppressive drugs. Data support the utility of Treg in managing immunopathologies, including solid organ transplant rejection, graft-versus-host disease, and autoimmune disorders. Notably, reports suggest that interleukin-2 (IL-2) is critical to survival of Treg, which constitutively express high levels of CD25, that is, the IL-2 receptor α-chain, and are exquisitely sensitive to IL-2, even at very low concentrations in contrast to effector T cells, which only upregulate IL-2 receptor α-chain on activation. This has led to the notion of using low doses of exogenous IL-2 therapeutically to modulate the immune system, specifically Treg numbers and function. Here, we summarize developments of clinical experience with low-dose IL-2 (LD-IL-2) as a therapeutic agent. So far, no clinical data are available to support the therapeutic use of LD-IL-2 therapy in the solid organ transplant setting. For the latter, fine-tuning by biotechnological approaches may be needed because of the narrow therapeutic window and off-target effects of LD-IL-2 therapy and so to realize the therapeutic potential of this molecule.

Development of Therapy Based on the Exploration of Biological Events Underlying the Pathogenetic Mechanisms of Chronic Hepatitis B Infection

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), an estimated 296 million people are chronically infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV). Approximately 15-25% of these people develop complications such as advanced chronic liver diseases (ACLDs). Mortality due to HBV-related complications accounted for an estimated 882,000 deaths in 2019. Potent preventive vaccines have already restricted new HBV infections, and several drugs are available to treat chronic HBV infections. However, the positive impacts of these drugs have been recorded in only a few patients with chronic HBV infection. These drugs do not show long-term efficacy and cannot halt the progression to complications. Thus, more effective and evidence-based therapeutic strategies need to be urgently developed for patients with chronic HBV infection. CHB is a pathological entity induced by HBV that progresses due to impaired host immunity. This indicates the inherent limitations of antiviral-drug-based monotherapy for treating patients with chronic HBV infection. Additionally, commercially available antiviral drugs are not available to patients in developing and resource-constrained countries, posing a challenge to achieving the following WHO goal: "Elimination of Hepatitis by 2030". As such, this review aimed to provide insights regarding evidence-based and effective management strategies for chronic HBV infection.

HBV Infection and Host Interactions: The Role in Viral Persistence and Oncogenesis

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a major cause of chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Despite the advent of vaccines and potent antiviral agents able to suppress viral replication, recovery from chronic HBV infection is still an extremely difficult goal to achieve. Complex interactions between virus and host are responsible for HBV persistence and the risk of oncogenesis. Through multiple pathways, HBV is able to silence both innate and adaptive immunological responses and become out of control. Furthermore, the integration of the viral genome into that of the host and the production of covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) represent reservoirs of viral persistence and account for the difficult eradication of the infection. An adequate knowledge of the virus-host interaction mechanisms responsible for viral persistence and the risk of hepatocarcinogenesis is necessary for the development of functional cures for chronic HBV infection. The purpose of this review is, therefore, to analyze how interactions between HBV and host concur in the mechanisms of infection, persistence, and oncogenesis and what are the implications and the therapeutic perspectives that follow.

Development of Therapeutic Vaccine for Chronic Hepatitis B: Concept, Cellular and Molecular Events, Design, Limitation, and Future Projection

Four decades have passed since the first usage of the therapeutic vaccine in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). However, there is no approved regimen of vaccine therapy for the treatment of CHB. This is mainly attributable to faulty conception, an improper understanding of the cellular and molecular mechanisms of CHB, and the impaired design of vaccine therapy for CHB. With the advent of new techniques and a better understanding of cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the genesis of CHB, the limitations and failures of previous regimens of therapeutic vaccines have been primarily understood. Additionally, the importance of immune therapy for treating millions of CHB patients and achieving the target of "Elimination of Hepatitis by 2030" has been focused on in the international arena. This has been amplified by the apparent limitation of commercially available antiviral drugs that are infinite in duration, endowed with safety concerns, and unable to cure liver damage due to their minimal immune modulation capacities. The proposed review article comprehensively discusses each of these points and proposes evidence-based approaches for viable types of vaccine therapy for the treatment of CHB.

Innovative Therapies Targeting the Virus and the Host for Treating Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection: From Bench to Bedside

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a highly complicated pathological process in which the disease is initiated by the hepatitis B virus (HBV); however, host immune responses are primarily responsible for variable extents of liver damage. If the patients with CHB remain untreated, many CHB patients will eventually develop complications like cirrhosis of the liver (LC) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In 2019, an estimated 882,000 patients died due to HBV-related complications worldwide. Accordingly, several drugs with antiviral properties have been used to treat CHB patients during the last four decades. However, the treatment outcome is not satisfactory because viral suppression is not usually related to the containment of progressive liver damage. Although proper reconstruction of host immunity is essential in CHB patients, as of today, there is no acceptable immune therapeutic protocol for them. These realities have exposed new, novel, and innovative therapeutic regimens for the management of CHB patients. This review will update the scope and limitation of the different innovative antiviral and immune therapeutic approaches for restoring effective host immunity and containing the virus in CHB patients to block progression to LC and HCC.

Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Scope and Limitation of Ongoing and Innovative Therapies for Treating Chronic Hepatitis B

Millions of people of the world suffer from chronic hepatitis B (CHB), a pathological entity in which the patients are chronically infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and express hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and HBV DNA, as well as evidence of liver damages. Considerable numbers of CHB patients develop cirrhosis of the liver and hepatocellular carcinoma if untreated. Two groups of drugs (interferons and nucleoside analogs) are used to treat CHB patients, but both are endowed with considerable adverse effects, increased costs, extended duration of therapy, and limited efficacy. Thus, there is a pressing need to develop new and innovative therapeutics for CHB patients, and many such drugs have been developed during the last four decades. Some of these drugs have inspired considerable optimism to be a game-changer for the treatment of CHB. Here, we first discuss why ongoing therapeutics such as interferon and nucleoside analogs could not stand the test of time. Next, we dissect the scope and limitation of evolving therapies for CHB by dissecting the cellular and molecular mechanisms of some of these innovative therapeutics.

Immune therapies against chronic hepatitis B

Patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) represent a living and permanent reservoir of hepatitis B virus (HBV). Millions of these CHB patients will eventually develop complications such as liver cirrhosis, hepatic failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma if they are not treated properly. Accordingly, several antiviral drugs have been developed for the treatment of CHB, but these drugs can neither eradicate all forms of HBV nor contain the progression of complications in most patients with CHB. Thus, the development of new and novel therapeutics for CHB remains a pressing need. The molecular and cellular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of CHB indicate that immune dysregulations may be responsible for HBV persistence and progressive liver damage in CHB. This provided the scientific and ethical basis for the immune therapy of CHB patients. Around 30 years have passed since the initiation of immune therapies for CHB in the early 1990s, and hundreds of clinical trials have been accomplished to substantiate this immune treatment. Despite these approaches, an acceptable regimen of immune therapy is yet to be realized. However, most immune therapeutic agents are safe for human usage, and many of these protocols have inspired considerable optimism. In this review, the pros and cons of different immune therapies, observed in patients with CHB during the last 30 years, will be discussed to derive insights into the development of an evidence-based, effective, and patient-friendly regimen of immune therapy for the treatment of CHB.

Sequential combination therapy with interferon, interleukin-2 and therapeutic vaccine in entecavir-suppressed chronic hepatitis B patients: the Endeavor study

BACKGROUND

Switching from nucleos(t)ide analogues to interferon (IFN) improves hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) loss. We aimed to evaluate whether combining immunomodulators such as interleukin-2 (IL-2) and therapeutic vaccine with IFN enhances HBsAg loss in entecavir (ETV)-suppressed patients.

METHODS

Ninety-four patients exhibiting virological suppression and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) loss following ETV treatment were randomized 1:1:1 to receive ETV (group I) or IFN (group II) for 48 weeks, or IFN and vaccine for 48 weeks plus IL-2 for 12 weeks (group III). The primary endpoint was HBsAg loss at week 48. Peripheral natural killer (NK) cells and regulatory T cells (Treg) were measured as immune checkpoint indicators.

RESULTS

Mean HBsAg decline at week 48 was significantly greater in group III (0.85 log 10 IU/mL) and group II (0.74 log 10 IU/mL), than in group I (0.13 log 10 IU/mL). At week 48, 9.38%, 3.03%, and 3.70% of subjects in group III, II, and I, respectively, achieved HBsAg loss. Among patients with baseline HBsAg titers ranging from 100 to 1500 IU/mL, HBsAg loss rate was 27.3, 7.1, and 0% in group III, II, and I, respectively. Responders in group III showed a significantly higher increase in CD56^bright CD16^-NK cells from week 24 to 36, and a significant decline in Treg from week 12 to 24 than non-responders.

CONCLUSION

For ETV-suppressed patients, particularly those with low baseline HBsAg levels, combination therapy with IFN and other immunomodulators may enhance HBsAg loss, while successful response correlates with partial restoration of NK cells and Tregs.

Novel insights into immunotherapy for hepatitis B patients

The possible use of immunotherapy for hepatitis B has emerged for two major reasons: (1) chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is an immune-mediated pathological condition, and (2) commercially available antiviral drugs are of limited efficacy. Although various immunomodulatory agents have been used to treat patients with CHB during the last three decades, there is currently no consensus among physicians and hepatologists regarding the suitability of immunotherapy for patients with CHB. However, new insights into immunotherapy for CHB have emerged; these may facilitate design of effective and tolerable immunotherapy regimens for these patients. This review provides a comprehensive overview of immunotherapy for CHB.

Immune therapy for hepatitis B

Although several antiviral drugs are now available for treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), sustained off-treatment clinical responses and containment of CHB-related complications are not achieved in majority of CHB patients by antiviral therapy. In addition, use of these drugs is endowed with substantial long term risk of viral resistance and drug toxicity. The infinite treatment regimens of antiviral drugs for CHB patients are also costly and usually unbearable by most patients of developing and resource-constrained countries. Taken together, there is a pressing need to develop new and innovative therapeutic approaches for CHB patients. Immune therapy seems to be an alternate therapeutic approach for CHB patients because impaired or distorted or diminished immune responses have been detected in most of these patients. Also, investigators have shown that restoration or induction of proper types of immune responses may have therapeutic implications in CHB. Various immunomodulatory agents have been used to treat patients with CHB around the world and the outcomes of these clinical trials show that the properties of immune modulators and nature and designing of immune therapeutic regimens seem to be highly relevant in the context of treatment of CHB patients. In this review, the general properties and specific features of immune therapy for CHB have been discussed for developing the guidelines of effective regimens of immune therapy for CHB.

Designing immune therapy for chronic hepatitis B

Presently-available antiviral drugs may not be a satisfactory option for treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). In spite of presence of several antiviral drugs, sustained off-treatment clinical responses are not common in CHB patients treated with antiviral drugs. In addition, antiviral drug treatment may have limited effects on blocking the progression of HBV-related complications. However, substantial long-term risk of viral resistance and drug toxicity are related with maintenance antiviral therapy in CHB patients with presently-available antiviral agents. The infinite treatments with antiviral drugs for CHB patients are also costly and may be unbearable by most patients of developing and resource-constrained countries. In this situation, there is pressing need to develop new and innovative therapeutic approaches for patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Immune therapy has emerged as an alternate therapeutic approach for CHB patients because studies have shown that host immunity is either impaired or derailed or distorted or diminished in CHB patients compared to patients with acute resolved hepatitis B who contain the HBV replication and control liver damages. Both non antigen-specific immune modulators and HBV antigen-specific agents have been used in CHB patients during last three decades. However, similar to antiviral therapy, the ongoing regimens of immune therapeutic approaches have also been unable to show real promises for treating CHB patients. The concept of immune therapy for treating CHB patients seems to be rationale and scientific, however, concerns remain about suitable designs of immune therapy for CHB patients.

Non-antigen-specific and antigen-specific immune therapies for chronic hepatitis B: evidences from laboratory benches and patient's bedsides

INTRODUCTION

Due to unsatisfactory therapeutic efficacy and considerable side effects of antiviral drugs in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), immunotherapy has emerged as an alternative approach. CHB immunotherapy may be categorized into two main types: i) non-antigen-specific immune therapy and ii) hepatitis B virus (HBV) antigen-specific immune therapy. Although different immune modulators have been used in CHB patients for the last two to three decades, the nature and design of ongoing regimens of immunotherapeutic approaches need considerable modifications.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors have outlined the relevant immunotherapies for CHB patients that have been used for the last two to three decades. The mechanisms underlying the limited therapeutic efficacy of available therapeutic agents for CHB patients have been discussed to aid in the development of an effective therapeutic approach for these patients.

EXPERT OPINION

Circumstantial evidence indicates that a better regimen of immunotherapy may be developed using different HBV-related antigens or combinations of two or more HBV-related antigens, or combinations of HBV-related antigens and antiviral drugs. However, the capacity of 'inducible immunity' by immune modulators to cure or block progression of liver diseases in CHB patients needs to be addressed.

Drug targets in hepatitis B virus infection

Hepatitis B virus infection (HBV) is a significant global health problem. Despite the success of universal hepatitis B vaccination in many countries, more than 350 million individuals worldwide are chronically infected and 15- 40% of those will develop cirrhosis and/or hepatocellular carcinoma if left untreated. Available therapies for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection are effective at decreasing viremia and improving measured clinical outcomes, however, no single therapy is optimal. As such, alternative drug therapies and the investigation of their role in the management of CHB are warranted. Significant improvements in the understanding of the HBV life cycle, viral genomics, and virus-host interactions continue to lead to the development of novel viral targets and immune modulators. Currently, two major classes of agents are utilized in CHB: the interferons and the nucleos(t)ide analogues. Each agent has individual advantages and drawbacks. The development of specific antiviral therapy has led to the emergence of HBV drug-resistant strains that has limited the long-term therapeutic potential of available agents. This necessitates the development of new agents that target both wild-type and drug-resistant strains. Further understanding of the basic mechanisms and clinical nuances of drug therapy is warranted. As most novel therapies are in the earliest stages of clinical development and testing, in the near future, treatment will continue to be long-term and likely involve the use of combination therapies to prevent viral resistance. In this review, we will highlight the HBV life cycle and genome, focusing in on current and potential novel antiviral drug targets as well as the benefits and clinical challenges with these therapies.

Inhibition of in vitro tumor cell proliferation by cytokines induced by combinations of TLR or TLR and TCR agonists

The objective of this study was to learn from in vitro studies how to better utilize Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists in controlling tumor growth. One of the primary effects of TLR agonists is induction of cytokine and chemokine production. In order to identify combinations of cytokines or chemokines with optimal ability to inhibit in vitro tumor cell proliferation, a panel of 17 recombinant human or mouse cytokines that have minimal effect on primary cell survival, were tested individually or in combinations of 2, 3 or 4 on a panel of human and mouse chemotherapy sensitive and resistant tumor cell lines. A combination of high (>10 ng/ml) levels of IFNgamma with moderate concentrations of TNFalpha>IFNalpha>IL-6=IL-8 was most effective at inhibiting in vitro tumor cell viability and proliferation with minimal effect on primary cells. We also observed that similar cytokine profile could be induced in vitro PBMC culture by using certain combinations of TLR-TLR and TLR-TCR agonists. Thus, concomitant activation of TLR7/8 with TLR4 or TLR 7/8 with T cell receptor (TCR) in PBMC, amongst all possible paired TLR-TLR and TLR-TCR agonist combinations, produced cytokine mix high in IFNgamma, in combination with IFNalpha, IL-6, IL-8, TNFalpha. Such cytokine mix was equal or more effective tumor cell killing and inhibition of tumor cell proliferation than the best rec-cytokine mixture tested. These results suggest that, TLR and/or TCR agonists combinations generate an optimal mixture of cytokines and chemokines competent in regulating in vitro tumor growth, and imply that realizing such "right cytokine induction" in vivo might be more efficacious than that with individual cytokines or TLR agonists induced cytokine mix.

Immunomodulatory therapy for chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) is one of the most prevalent viral pathogens of man with around 350 million chronically infected patients. It has been postulated that in persistently infected individuals the HBV-specific immune response is too weak to eliminate HBV from all infected hepatocytes, but sufficiently strong to continuously destroy HBV-infected hepatocytes and to induce chronic inflammatory liver disease. The primary aim in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B is to induce sustained disease remission and prevent serious complications like liver failure and/or hepatocellular carcinoma. The recent emergence of drug-resistant HBV mutants and post-treatment relapse as a consequence of nucleoside analogue monotherapy emphasizes that the principal goal should be to stimulate a successful immune response. In this paper we will focus on the immune response to HBV and we will review reported data on immunotherapeutic strategies like immunomodulatory drugs (cytokines and Thymic derivates) and vaccine therapies using currently available recombinant anti-HBV vaccines, lipopeptide-based T cell vaccine and newly developed genetic vaccines.

Advances in immunomodulating therapy of HBV infection

Patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection have a higher risk of developing liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Interferon-alpha, lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil are the three approved treatment for chronic HBV infection and offers the only means of preventing the development of these complications. However, the efficacy of these agents, in terms of loss of Hepatitis B e antigen with or without seroconversion to Hepatitis B e antibody, normalization of serum alanine transaminase levels, loss of serum HBV DNA, and improvement in liver histology can only be achieved in 20-30% of those treated. Long-term treatment with either lamivudine or adefovir dipivoxil can result in the development of drug resistant mutants leading to an increased length of treatment with additional nucleoside analogues. These limitations of the current antiviral therapies underline the need for alternative therapies. Specific and nonspecific immunotherapeutic strategies to restore effective virus-specific T cell responses in those with chronic HBV infection offers an interesting alternative approach. These immunotherapeutic therapies include the adoptive transfer of HBV immunity, pegylated interferon and therapeutic vaccine therapies.

Clinical and immunological efficacy of intradermal vaccine plus lamivudine with or without interleukin-2 in patients with chronic hepatitis B

To evaluate therapeutic immunostimulation nine chronic hepatitis B patients received six monthly intradermal vaccinations with HBsAg in combination with daily lamivudine. Another five patients received six doses of the vaccine and daily lamivudine together with daily Interleukin-2 (IL-2) s.c. within 3 months in an open-labeled trial. Clinical efficacy was assessed by alanine transaminase levels and HBV serology. The induction of specific T and B cell responses was analyzed serially by 3H-thymidine uptake, ELISA and ELISPOT assays. After the therapy was stopped, seven of nine vaccine/lamivudine and two of five vaccine/lamivudine/IL-2 recipients did not have detectable HBV DNA. Four complete responders cleared the virus and had normalized ALT levels, however, one of these patients showed transient disease reactivation followed by spontaneous viral clearance and normal ALT five months later. Low frequencies of anti-HBs producing B cells and HBV specific T helper cells secreting predominantly interferon-gamma were induced by i.d. vaccine therapy. The ELISPOT technique demonstrated transient induction of HBV peptide specific cytotoxic T cells in seven HLA-A2 positive chronic HBV carriers. The preliminary data from this study demonstrate that the HBV surface antigen vaccine in combination with antiviral or immunomodulating drugs induced antiviral immune responses and consequently viral elimination may be achieved in patients with unfavorable prognosis.

Tolerability of treatments for viral hepatitis

Interferon-alpha is the most widely used antiviral drug in chronic hepatitis B and C. Tolerability is usually good and serious adverse effects are rare. Most of the adverse effects are mild or transient and do not necessitate drug withdrawal. More than 90% of patients who are given interferon-alpha achieve 6 months to 1 year of treatment without serious adverse effects. The serious adverse effects usually occur in predisposed patients with pre-existing organ dysfunction. Nevertheless, careful selection of patients for therapy and observation during therapy are recommended. Nucleoside analogues are promising drugs in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B through inhibition of viral DNA polymerase. Lamivudine has been licensed for use in this indication. Its tolerability is excellent even when used for periods of 1 year or more. The main concern is the relatively high incidence of viral resistance resulting in breakthrough during or relapse after therapy. In the treatment of chronic hepatitis C, ribavirin, in combination with interferon-alpha is currently the reference therapy. The main adverse effect is haemolytic anaemia, which necessitates careful monitoring and adjustment of dosage in many cases. Recently, large trials showed the better efficacy of pegylated interferons as compared with standard interferon. The combination of pegylated interferon with ribavirin is under evaluation.

Serum interleukin 2 and soluble interleukin 2 receptor in chronic active hepatitis C: effect of interferon therapy

T lymphocytes produce interleukin 2 (IL-2) associated with the expression of a soluble receptor for IL-2 (sIL-2R) on the surface of the cells, and these cytokines may contribute to hepatic injury in chronic active hepatitis C (CAH-C). Serum IL-2 and sIL-2R levels were analysed by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay in 22 patients (eight female, 14 male, mean age 42.6 years) with CAH-C. Eight patients had been given interferon alpha-2a (IFN alpha-2a), 3 million international units, three times weekly, for a mean of 12 weeks while the others were not on treatment. Serum IL-2 levels were 60.8 +/- 9.5 pg/ml, 66.6 +/- 5.7 pg/ml and 59.1 +/- 4.0 pg/ml in the treated patients, untreated patients and controls, respectively. Serum sIL-2R levels were 1631 +/- 194 pg/ml, 4016 +/- 1076 pg/ml and 1169 +/- 115 pg/ml in treated patients, untreated patients and controls, respectively. There were no significant differences in serum IL-2 levels between the groups (P > 0.05) while a significant difference was found in serum sIL-2R levels between untreated patients and controls (P = 0.0032). Serum sIL-2R levels were lower in patients treated with IFN alpha-2a than in untreated patients but this difference was not statistically significant. This preliminary study indicates that there are no significant changes in serum IL-2 levels in CAH-C patients, but that sIL-2R concentrations are raised in untreated patients though not in treated patients. High serum sIL-2R concentrations may have a role in the pathogenesis of CAH-C.

Immunotherapy with low-dose interleukin-2 and interferon-gamma in a murine tumor model

The aim of this study was to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of locally administered low-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) alone or together with interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) in a herpes simplex virus type 2-transformed murine (H238) fibrosarcoma model. In vitro incubation showed that IL-2, but not IFN-gamma, had a significant inhibitory effect on DNA synthesis in H238 cells. In vivo experiments were performed with BALB/c mice to determine the optimal time of treatment with each cytokine after subcutaneous (sc) tumor implantation. The greatest antitumor effect with IL-2 (1 x 10(5) total international units, sc) was noted when treatment was administered during the first week after tumor injection, whereas with IFN-gamma (500 total units, intraperitoneally) treatment during the second week proved best. Combination of the two agents produced complete tumor regression in 44.4% of mice; regression with single-modality treatment was 0-11%. The presence of H238 tumor induced splenomegaly and enhanced the oxidative burst capacity of phagocytes. Peripheral blood leukocyte counts were low in tumor-bearing groups, regardless of treatment. IL-2 and IFN-gamma were nondetectable in the plasma of tumor-bearing or control mice; however, total TGF-beta 1 was 248% higher with IL-2 treatment compared with tumor-bearing nontreated controls. These results show that IL-2 and IFN-gamma can significantly inhibit the growth of highly aggressive H238 tumors and support further investigations with these agents.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B

Chronic infection with the hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a major cause of worldwide morbidity and mortality. A large number of therapeutic approaches has been tried, including interferon (IFN), nucleoside analogues and immunomodulators. To date controlled clinical trials have shown that only IFN is of long-term value but many patients fail to respond to treatment. New approaches to treating patients with IFN-resistant hepatitis B are currently undergoing clinical and experimental evaluation, and it seems likely that new therapeutic agents will be available in the near future.