Hepatitis B virus infection combined with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Interaction and prognosis

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is still one kind of the infectious diseases that seriously threaten human health. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become the most common chronic liver disease worldwide. HBV infection complicated with NAFLD is increasingly common. This review mainly describes the interaction between HBV infection and NAFLD, the interaction between steatosis and antiviral drugs, and the prognosis of HBV infection complicated with NAFLD. Most studies suggest that HBV infection may reduce the incidence of NAFLD. NAFLD can promote the spontaneous clearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), but whether it affects antiviral efficacy has been reported inconsistently. HBV infection combined with NAFLD can promote the progression of liver fibrosis, especially in patients with severe steatosis. The outcome of HBV infection combined with NAFLD predisposing to the progression of HCC remains controversial.

Efficient stabilization of therapeutic hepatitis B vaccine components by amino-acid formulation maintains its potential to break immune tolerance

Background & Aims

Induction of potent, HBV-specific immune responses is crucial to control and finally cure HBV. The therapeutic hepatitis B vaccine TherVacB combines protein priming with a Modified Vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA)-vector boost to break immune tolerance in chronic HBV infection. Particulate protein and vector vaccine components, however, require a constant cooling chain for storage and transport, posing logistic and financial challenges to vaccine applications. We aimed to identify an optimal formulation to maintain stability and immunogenicity of the protein and vector components of the vaccine using a systematic approach.

Methods

We used stabilizing amino acid (SAA)-based formulations to stabilize HBsAg and HBV core particles (HBcAg), and the MVA-vector. We then investigated the effect of lyophilization and short- and long-term high-temperature storage on their integrity. Immunogenicity and safety of the formulated vaccine was validated in HBV-naïve and adeno-associated virus (AAV)-HBV-infected mice.

Results

In vitro analysis proved the vaccine's stability against thermal stress during lyophilization and the long-term stability of SAA-formulated HBsAg, HBcAg and MVA during thermal stress at 40 °C for 3 months and at 25 °C for 12 months. Vaccination of HBV-naïve and AAV-HBV-infected mice demonstrated that the stabilized vaccine was well tolerated and able to brake immune tolerance established in AAV-HBV mice as efficiently as vaccine components constantly stored at 4 °C/-80 °C. Even after long-term exposure to elevated temperatures, stabilized TherVacB induced high titre HBV-specific antibodies and strong CD8⁺ T-cell responses, resulting in anti-HBs seroconversion and strong suppression of the virus in HBV-replicating mice.

Conclusion

SAA-formulation resulted in highly functional and thermostable HBsAg, HBcAg and MVA vaccine components. This will facilitate global vaccine application without the need for cooling chains and is important for the development of prophylactic as well as therapeutic vaccines supporting vaccination campaigns worldwide.

Impact and implications

Therapeutic vaccination is a promising therapeutic option for chronic hepatitis B that may enable its cure. However, its application requires functional cooling chains during transport and storage that can hardly be guaranteed in many countries with high demand. In this study, the authors developed thermostable vaccine components that are well tolerated and that induce immune responses and control the virus in preclinical mouse models, even after long-term exposure to high surrounding temperatures. This will lower costs and ease application of a therapeutic vaccine and thus be beneficial for the many people affected by hepatitis B around the world.

Therapeutic vaccine BRII-179 restores HBV-specific immune responses in patients with chronic HBV in a phase Ib/IIa study

Background & Aims

Functional cure of chronic HBV infection (CHB) without life-long treatment requires the restoration of defective HBV-specific humoral and cellular immunity. Therapeutic vaccines based on the major structural and non-structural proteins have been tested in patients with CHB but have shown scarce immunogenicity. BRII-179, also known as VBI-2601, is a novel formulation comprised of all 3 HBV surface envelope proteins (Pre-S1, Pre-S2, and S). Safety, antiviral activity, and immunogenicity of BRII-179 admixed with co-adjuvant interferon (IFN)-α were assessed in patients with CHB.

Method

This randomized, open-label, controlled phase Ib/IIa study included 2 dose levels, 20 μg BRII-179 (Part 1, n = 25) and 40 μg BRII-179 (Part 2, n = 24). Patients, virally suppressed under nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy were randomized 1:2:2 into 3 cohorts in Part 1 and 1:1 into 2 cohorts in Part 2 to receive 4 monthly intramuscular injections of BRII-179 admixed with/without 3 MIU IFN-α. Antibody and cellular responses to HBsAg, as well as evolution of circulating HBsAg were monitored.

Results

Both 20 μg and 40 μg BRII-179 with/without IFN-α were well tolerated with no severe adverse events. BRII-179 induced anti-HBs responses in >30% patients in all treatment cohorts, however, moderate anti-Pre-S1 or anti-Pre-S2 antibody responses were only observed in patients receiving BRII-179 with IFN-α. BRII-179 also restored S-, Pre-S1-, Pre-S2-specific IFN-γ-producing T-cells in the majority of treated patients. Overall, no notable reduction of HBsAg was observed after BRII-179 treatment.

Conclusion

In patients with CHB under NA therapy, BRII-179 with/without IFN-α exhibited a good safety profile and induced HBV-specific B- and T-cell immune responses. These data support further clinical evaluation of BRII-179 in combination with other therapies.

Clinical Trial Number

ACTRN12619001210167.

Lay summary

BRII-179 is a therapeutic vaccine designed to improve the immune response in patients with chronic hepatitis B. In this study, BRII-179 alone or with a low dose of interferon-α was safe, well tolerated, and induced enhanced HBV-specific antibody and T-cell responses in patients with chronic hepatitis B. However, BRII-179 treatment alone had minimal effect on patient's virological status. The potential of BRII-179 to achieve a functional cure in conjunction with other agents is being evaluated in the clinic.

On-treatment HBV RNA dynamic predicts entecavir-induced HBeAg seroconversion in children with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion is an important intermediate outcome in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients. This study aimed to explore whether hepatitis B virus (HBV) RNA serum levels can predict HBeAg seroconversion treated with entecavir.

METHODS

Serum samples from HBeAg-positive children previously treated with entecavir were retrospectively analyzed. HBV RNA levels were measured at baseline, weeks 12, 24, 48, 72 of therapy. Ability of individual biomarkers to predict HBeAg seroconversion was evaluated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyzes.

RESULTS

Serum HBV RNA was detectable in 51 children with a median of 6.05 (4.04-8.29) log₁₀ IU/mL at baseline. Patients with subsequent HBeAg seroconversion showed a significantly larger decline in median HBV RNA levels during treatment from baseline to week 12 of 1.96 (0.30-3.38) and to week 24 of 2.27 (1.20-3.38) log₁₀ IU/mL, respectively, in comparison to HBeAg-positive patients without HBeAg seroconversion (P < 0.001). Levels of HBV RNA at treatment weeks 12 and 24 showed good ability to predict HBeAg seroconversion (area under ROC scores > 0.85, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

On-treatment HBV RNA dynamic predicts entecavir-induced HBeAg seroconversion in children with chronic hepatitis B living in China.

Tenofovir is Superior to Entecavir in Patients with Treatment-naïve Hepatitis B e-Antigen-Positive Chronic Hepatitis B

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) is a global health problem affecting around 400 million of people worldwide. Two available first-line antiviral drugs are tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and Entecavir (ETV). Till date,there are few published reports from India comparing efficacy of TDF and ETV in CHB cases. Therefore, this present study was carried out with an aim to compare the efficacy of ETV and TDF in patients with nucleos(t)ide naïve CHB.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was carried out in 192 treatment naïve CHB cases, who completed 24 months of treatment with either TDF or ETV between March 2015 and August 2017. The primary end point of the study was undetectable hepatitis B virus DNA after 24 months of therapy.

RESULTS

Of total 192 patients with CHB, 38 hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg)-positive and 53 HBeAg-negative patients were treated with tenofovir, whereas 40 HBeAg-positive and 61 HBeAg-negative patients were treated with ETV. Pretreatment characteristics at baseline were not statistically different between the TDF and ETV groups. Patients treated with TDF achieved significantly higher complete viral suppression as compared with ETV-treated patients (Log rank: 7.04, P = 0.008) in HBeAg-positive CHB during the 24 months follow-up time; whereas no significant difference in viral suppression rate could be noticed in HBeAg-negative patients (Log rank: 0.98, P = 0.38). Both univariate and multivariate analysis by cox proportional hazard model confirmed that tenofovir had significant rate of complete viral suppression in comparison with ETV in HBeAg-positive patients (P < 0.05); whereas complete viral suppression rates were similar in HBeAg-negative patients.

CONCLUSION

In our study, tenofovir had more effective antiviral suppressive effect compared with ETV in HBeAg-positive, nucleos(t)ide-naïve CHB cases.

EGF receptor inhibitors comprehensively suppress hepatitis B virus by downregulation of STAT3 phosphorylation

Current antiviral therapy can not cure chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection or eliminate the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma. The licensed epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors have found to inhibit hepatitis C virus replication via downregulation of signal transducers and activators of transcription 3 (STAT3) phosphorylation. Since STAT3 is also involved in HBV replication, we further studied the anti-HBV efficacy of the EGFR inhibitors in this study. HBV-transfected HepG2.2.15 cells and HBV-infected HepG2-NTCP cells were used as cell models, and HBV replication, the syntheses of viral antigens and the magnitude of the covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) reservoir were used as indictors to test the anti-HBV effects of EGFR inhibitors erlotinib and gefitinib. Erlotinib inhibited HBV replication with a half-maximal inhibitory concentration of 1.05 μM. It also reduced the syntheses of viral antigens at concentrations of 2.5 μM or higher. The underlying mechanism was possibly correlated with its inhibition on STAT3 phosphorylation via up-regulation of suppressor of cytokine signaling 3. Gefitinib also inhibited HBV replication and antigen syntheses. Compared with the commonest antiviral drug entecavir, these EGFR inhibitors additionally reduced hepatitis B e antigen and erlotinib also marginally affected the cccDNA reservoir in HBV-infected HepG2-NTCP cells. Interestingly, these promising anti-HBV effects were significantly enhanced by extension of treatment duration. In conclusion, EGFR inhibitors demonstrated a comprehensive anti-HBV potential, highlighting a new strategy to cure HBV infection and suggesting animal model-related studies or clinical try in the future.

•

We test the anti-HBV potential of EGFR inhibitors erlotinib and gefitinib in vitro.

•

Erlotinib inhibits HBV replication in clinically safe concentrations.

•

EGFR inhibitors suppress HBV by downregulation of STAT3 phosphorylation.

•

EGFR inhibitors show a comprehensive anti-HBV potential including the cccDNA.

Rebound of HBV DNA after cessation of nucleos/tide analogues in chronic hepatitis B patients with undetectable covalently closed

Background & Aims

Nucleos(t)ide analogues (NUCs) effectively suppress serum HBV DNA. Previously, we have identified 21 patients with undetectable covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) upon long-term NUC therapy. This study investigated the effect of NUC withdrawal in patients with undetectable cccDNA.

Methods

Nineteen patients on long term NUCs (median 13.4 years) were recruited: 13 were randomized to discontinue NUCs; 6 to continue taking NUCs. All had undetectable cccDNA at the time of last liver biopsy (median time 2.9 years prior to randomization). Serum HBV DNA, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg), liver biochemistry, and serum HBV RNA were monitored.

Results

At the time of randomization, all patients had undetectable serum HBV DNA and HBV RNA. Twelve of the 13 patients had HBV DNA rebound to 100 IU/ml within 20 weeks of NUC discontinuation. The thirteenth patient had HBV DNA rebound at week 70. Three patients experienced biochemical flares after re-treatment which subsequently resolved. There was no significant association between the time of HBV DNA rebound and baseline HBsAg, HBcrAg and alanine aminotransferase, duration of treatment, and age at which treatment was stopped (all p >0.05). At the time of HBV DNA rebound, HBV DNA levels correlated with HBcrAg levels (p = 0.003), but not with HBsAg levels (p = 0.262).

Conclusions

In patients with undetectable intrahepatic cccDNA, virologic rebound still occurred after NUC cessation. At the rebound of HBV DNA, the kinetics of HBsAg production were independent of those of viral DNA replication. Additional studies are required to determine the factors that may predict virologic rebound and when NUCs can be discontinued in HBsAg-positive patients with chronic hepatitis B.

Lay summary

It has been shown that following long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment for chronic hepatitis B, some patients have undetectable levels of viral DNA in their livers. We tested the results of withdrawing nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment in these patients and found that viral relapse could occur in patients with undetectable viral DNA. Further research is required to determine whether nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment can be discontinued in specific patients with chronic hepatitis B.

•

Patients on long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue treatment with undetectable HBV DNA may have undetectable cccDNA.

•

Stopping treatment for patients with undetectable cccDNA resulted in rebound of serum HBV DNA, mostly within 20 weeks.

•

There is no association between time of HBV DNA rebound and other viral markers, including HBsAg titers and HBcrAg.

•

Even in patients with undetectable cccDNA in liver biopsies, virologic relapse can still occur.

Prevalence and Characteristics of Hepatitis Delta Virus Infection in a Tertiary Hospital Setting in Cameroon

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis D virus (HDV) coinfection is associated with more severe liver disease than HBV alone. More knowledge on the epidemiology and clinical impact of HDV-infected individuals is needed in Cameroon.We aimed at determining the frequency of anti-HDV antibody testing in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive patients, the proportion of anti-HDV positivity, and the characteristics of anti-HDV positive compared to anti-HDV negative patients in a tertiary hospital setting in Cameroon.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted. Clinical records of chronic HBV-infected patients attending the gastroenterology unit at the Douala General Hospital from 2010 to 2014 were reviewed.

RESULTS

Of 365 files of HBsAg-positive patients defined as chronic HBV infection, 80.5% (294) were tested for anti-HDV antibodies, among whom 10.5% (31/294) were positive. Median aspartate aminotransferase (P < 0.0001), alanine aminotransferase (P < 0.0001), and gamma glutaryl transpeptidase (P < 0.0001) were significantly higher while platelets count (P < 0.002) and prothrombin time (P < 0.0001) were significantly lower in anti-HDV positive compared to anti-HDV negative patients. Liver necroinflammation (P < 0.0001), fibrosis score (P < 0.0001), and decompensated cirrhosis (P < 0.0001) were also significantly associated with anti-HDV positivity.

CONCLUSION

The proportion of anti-HDV antibody positivity remains high in this setting and was significantly associated with more severe liver disease compared to those who were anti-HDV negative. More studies are needed to evaluate rates of HDV testing in other centers in Cameroon and the subregion. Preventive strategies for HBV prevention, which also apply to HDV, must still be reinforced by healthcare providers and policy makers.

T cell--associated immunoregulation and antiviral effect of oxymatrine in hydrodynamic injection HBV mouse model

Although oxymatrine (OMT) has been shown to directly inhibit the replication of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in vitro, limited research has been done with this drug in vivo. In the present study, the antiviral effect of OMT was investigated in an immunocompetent mouse model of chronic HBV infection. The infection was achieved by tail vein injection of a large volume of DNA solution. OMT (2.2, 6.7 and 20 mg/kg) was administered by daily intraperitoneal injection for 6 weeks. The efficacy of OMT was evaluated by the levels of HBV DNA, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and hepatitis B core antigen (HBcAg). The immunoregulatory activity of OMT was evaluated by serum ELISA and flow cytometry. Results shows that OMT at 20 mg/kg inhibited HBV replication, and it was more efficient than entecavir (ETV) in the elimination of serum HBsAg and intrahepatic HBcAg. In addition, OMT accelerated the production of interferon-γ (IFN-γ) in a dose-dependent manner in CD4⁺ T cells. Our findings demonstrate the beneficial effects of OMT on the enhancement of immunological function and in the control of HBV antigens. The findings suggest this drug to be a good antiviral therapeutic candidate for the treatment of HBV infection.

Designing immune therapy for chronic hepatitis B

Presently-available antiviral drugs may not be a satisfactory option for treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). In spite of presence of several antiviral drugs, sustained off-treatment clinical responses are not common in CHB patients treated with antiviral drugs. In addition, antiviral drug treatment may have limited effects on blocking the progression of HBV-related complications. However, substantial long-term risk of viral resistance and drug toxicity are related with maintenance antiviral therapy in CHB patients with presently-available antiviral agents. The infinite treatments with antiviral drugs for CHB patients are also costly and may be unbearable by most patients of developing and resource-constrained countries. In this situation, there is pressing need to develop new and innovative therapeutic approaches for patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Immune therapy has emerged as an alternate therapeutic approach for CHB patients because studies have shown that host immunity is either impaired or derailed or distorted or diminished in CHB patients compared to patients with acute resolved hepatitis B who contain the HBV replication and control liver damages. Both non antigen-specific immune modulators and HBV antigen-specific agents have been used in CHB patients during last three decades. However, similar to antiviral therapy, the ongoing regimens of immune therapeutic approaches have also been unable to show real promises for treating CHB patients. The concept of immune therapy for treating CHB patients seems to be rationale and scientific, however, concerns remain about suitable designs of immune therapy for CHB patients.

Chronic hepatitis B virus infection and pregnancy

Planning of pregnancy and management of chronic hepatitis B virus during pregnancy includes recognition of maternal virological status, assessment of liver disease severity and minimization of risk for mother to infant transmission of infection. Decisions regarding the use of antivirals during pregnancy need to be individualized. Monitoring for infection and immunization in newborns is also important. For mothers on antiviral therapy, breastfeeding is not recommended.