Lamivudine is safe and effective in fulminant hepatitis B

Combination lamivudine and adefovir versus entecavir for the treatment of naïve chronic hepatitis B patients: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of combination lamivudine (LAM) and adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) versus entecavir (ETV) monotherapy for naïve HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients.

MATERIAL/METHODS

Fifty enrolled patients with CHB were evenly divided into 2 groups: a group treated with of lamivudine (LAM) (100 mg/day) plus adefovir (ADV) (10 mg/day) combination, and a group treated with entecavir (ETV) (0.5 mg/day). Serum levels of ALT, AST, creatinine, bilirubin, HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV viral load, and genotypic resistance were analyzed at 0, 12, 24, 52, and 104 weeks. HBV DNA levels were determined by real-time PCR and HBsAg and HBeAg by chemiluminescence. Serum levels of ALT, AST, creatinine, and bilirubin were measured by an automatic biochemical analyzer. Data analysis was performed with SPSS 12.0 software.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in the virological response (VR) rates between LAM+ADV and ETV cohorts at 24, 52, and 104 weeks (P>0.05). The HBeAg seroconversion rates were 28% and 20%, and the biochemical response (BR) rates were 88% and 84% at week 104 in the LAM+ADV and ETV groups, respectively. The rates of undetectable HBV DNA, HBeAg seroconversion, and ALT normalization rates were similar in both cohorts. No virological breakthrough or serious adverse effects were noted for any patient during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Both LAM+ADV combination therapy and ETV monotherapy were effective and safe in the treatment of -naïve HBeAg-positive CHB patients. However, further studies are needed to obtain long-term results.

[Pharmacological treatment of acute hepatitis B]

The incidence of acute B hepatitis is decreasing due to socioeconomical changes and the implementation of vaccination programs. Nevertheless it is potentially severe, causing approximately 30% of acute liver failures in Spain. Pharmacological treatment of acute B hepatitis has become a matter of issue over the last decade. This text offers a review of the published data and international guidelines. Most published studies have a low methodological quality and lamivudine was used as treatment in all of them. A survival improvement with prompt treatment has been shown in acute liver injury and probably in severe acute hepatitis (total bilirubin>10mg/dl and INR>1.5). International guidelines support treatment in these cases, but there is no consensus on the drug to use or the length of treatment.

The requirement for a sufficient period of corticosteroid treatment in combination with nucleoside analogue for severe acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of severe acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B is very poor if signs of liver failure appear. We have reported the efficacy of the early introduction of sufficient doses of corticosteroids (CSs) and nucleoside analogues (NAs), but the optimal period of immunosuppressive therapy has not been well demonstrated. In this study, we analyzed patients with severe acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B treated with CSs and NAs, prospectively, in order to clarify the factors affecting their outcome.

METHODS

Ten patients, admitted to our liver unit between 2000 and 2009, were defined as having severe exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B based on our uniform criteria, and were enrolled in this study. NAs and sufficient doses of CS were introduced as soon as possible after making the diagnosis of severe disease prospectively.

RESULTS

Seven of the 10 patients recovered. The absence of fulminant hepatitis on admission, the improvement of prothrombin time (PT) activity and the decline of hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA during the first 2 and 4 weeks, respectively, were significant in the recovered patients, while the worsening of total bilirubin level during 4 weeks, especially between week 2 and week 4, was significant in those who died.

CONCLUSIONS

In severe acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B, more than a few weeks of CS treatment in combination with an NA is required in the early stage, whereas a short period of conventional pulse therapy would be insufficient for treating this condition.

Efficacy of combination therapy of antiviral and immunosuppressive drugs for the treatment of severe acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Patients with severe exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B, sometimes developing into fulminant liver failure, are at high risk for mortality even with antiviral therapy. The efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy in clinically severe exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B has not been well demonstrated. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of the early introduction of immunosuppressive therapy in combination with antiviral therapy in such patients.

METHODS

Forty-two patients, 29 men and 13 women, were defined as having severe exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B based on our uniform criteria, and were enrolled in this study. Sixteen patients between 1982 and 1996 were analyzed retrospectively. We defined the criteria of severe disease in 1997, and then began to introduce sufficient doses of corticosteroids prospectively. Nucleoside analogs were administered in combination with corticosteroids after 1999. Twenty-six patients between 1997 and 2007 were analyzed prospectively.

RESULTS

In the retrospective study between 1982 and 1996, four of 16 (25%) patients recovered. In the prospective study between 1997 and 2007, 17 of 26 (65%) patients recovered; 15 of 17 patients treated with corticosteroids with or without antiviral drugs within 10 days after the diagnosis of severe disease recovered, none of five treated similarly but later than 10 days after the diagnosis recovered, and two of three treated with antiviral drugs recovered.

CONCLUSIONS

The early introduction of sufficient doses of corticosteroids and nucleoside analogs could be one option for reversing the potential deterioration of patients with clinically severe, life-threatening exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B: recommendations from an Italian workshop

The changing scenario of hepatitis B virus therapy has encouraged the organisation of a workshop, endorsed by three Italian scientific societies, aimed at defining the current recommendations for hepatitis B virus treatment. Liver histology and stage of disease remain fundamental for treatment decisions; interferon and nucleoside/nucleotide analogues-based therapy represent different strategies for different phases of the hepatitis B virus disease. The recommendations defined: new and lower cut-off of hepatitis B virus-DNA for eligibility to therapy according to disease stage, how to optimise the use of nucleoside/nucleotide analogues and to individualise the monitoring of response and what to do with treatment failures. Specific recommendations have also been given for cirrhosis patients, those immune suppressed and co-infected with HIV and other hepatitis viruses.

Safety and efficacy of lamivudine in patients with severe acute or fulminant hepatitis B, a multicenter experience

Acute hepatitis B progresses to liver failure with the need of liver transplantation in about 1% of cases. We treated patients with severe acute or fulminant hepatitis B with lamivudine in an attempt to prevent hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection after potential liver transplantation. Since September 2000, 17 patients with severe acute or fulminant HBV infection were treated with 100 or 150 mg lamivudine daily once we had evidence for a severe course as indicated by an INR >2.0. These were compared to a historic control from our unit and to external patients. Fourteen of the 17 patients (82.4%) survived with full recovery without liver transplantation. All these 14 individuals cleared HBsAg on lamivudine within less than 6 months. Twelve patients recovered quickly as indicated by a normalized prothrombin time within 1 week while two patients had a more prolonged course. None of the patients showed an adverse event. Three patients requiring transplantation despite lamivudine therapy had more advanced disease on admission, of whom one had additionally ingested paracetamol (acetaminophen) while the second was already HBV-DNA negative by polymerase chain reaction on admission. The lamivudine treated patients had significant higher frequency of survival without liver transplantation 82.4 vs 20% (4/20) in the historic control (P < 0.001). Similar data were derived from external centres using lamivudine (15/20, 75%). Lamivudine is safe in patients with severe acute or fulminant hepatitis B, leading to fast recovery with the potential to prevent liver failure and liver transplantation when administered early enough.

Importance of adequate immunosuppressive therapy for the recovery of patients with “life-threatening” severe exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B

AIM: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) re-activation often occurs spontaneously or after withdrawal of immunosuppressive therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B. Severe exacerbation, sometimes developing into fulminant hepatic failure, is at high risk of mortality. The efficacy of corticosteroid therapy in “clinically severe” exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B has not been well demonstrated. In this study we evaluated the efficacy of early introduction of high-dose corticosteroid therapy in patients with life-threatening severe exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B.

METHODS: Twenty-two patients, 14 men and 8 women, were defined as “severe” exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B using uniform criteria and enrolled in this study. Eleven patients were treated with corticosteroids at 60 mg or more daily with or without anti-viral drugs within 10 d after the diagnosis of severe disease (“early high-dose” group) and 11 patients were either treated more than 10 d or untreated with corticosteroids (“non-early high-dose” group).

RESULTS: Mean age, male-to-female ratio, mean prothrombin time (PT) activity, alanine transaminase (ALT) level, total bilirubin level, positivity of HBeAg, mean IgM-HBc titer, and mean HBV DNA polymerase activity did not differ between the two groups. Ten of 11 patients of the “early high-dose” group survived, while only 2 of 11 patients of the “non-early high-dose” group survived (P<0.001). During the first 2 wk after the introduction of corticosteroids, improvements in PT activities and total bilirubin levels were observed in the “early high-dose” group. Both ALT levels and HBV DNA polymerase levels fell in both groups.

CONCLUSION: The introduction of high-dose corticosteroid can reverse deterioration in patients with “clinically life-threatening” severe exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B, when used in the early stage of illness.

The use of lamivudine for patients with acute hepatitis B (a series of cases)

There are limited data on the use of lamivudine for patients with severe forms of acute hepatitis B. We report our experience with the use of lamivudine in six patients with acute HBV infection. Lamivudine was justified by disease severity for four patients and by concerns about risk of chronicity for two patients. The diagnoses of the treated patients were: fulminant liver failure (two patients), severe acute hepatitis B, protracted acute hepatitis B, and new HBV infection in the renal dialysis setting (two patients, one with severe liver injury). Serum HBV DNA titres ranged from 10(5) to 10(7) copies/mL prior to commencement of lamivudine. Lamivudine treatment was associated with a decline in serum HBV DNA and serum transaminases in all patients. All but one patient survived. A 58-year-old man with fulminant hepatitis and multiple organ failure died despite antiviral treatment. When possible, HBeAg and HBsAg seroconversion was documented during follow-up. In the absence of a randomized, prospective study of lamivudine in patients with severe acute hepatitis B, our data encourage the use of this safe and well tolerated drug.

Neonatal liver failure

Liver failure in the neonatal period is challenging to diagnose and manage, and still carries a high mortality. With ongoing developments in the field of metabolic disorders and antiviral therapy, and the ability to offer liver transplantation to small babies, an overall survival of 40% has been achieved. Early recognition of liver failure, good supportive care and prompt referral to a paediatric liver transplant centre are essential elements in improving the outcome for these babies. Decisions about contra-indications to and timing of transplantation are complex as many of the disease processes are still evolving in the neonatal period, and extrahepatic disease, which cannot be corrected by a transplant, may appear later.

Successful clearance of hepatitis B virus after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: beneficial combination of adoptive immunity transfer and lamivudine

We report a 38-yr-old male with acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL), whose serological tests for the hepatitis B virus (HBV) before transplantation showed a chronic carrier status, and a liver biopsy specimen revealed chronic liver injury because of HBV. The patient underwent allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT) from his sibling who was hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) positive. He had received lamivudine treatment for the prophylaxis of HBV reactivation during cytotoxic chemotherapy, and lamivudine administration continued after transplantation. Successful engraftment was documented 3 wk after PBSCT, and clearance of the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) was observed 2 months after PBSCT. Liver function tests transiently showed a mild elevation of aminotransferases on day 25, although this returned to normal after the dose escalation of the immunosuppressive agent. We presume that the combination of adoptive immunity transfer by bone marrow transplantation (BMT) from an HBsAb-positive donor and antiviral drugs such as lamivudine is beneficial in clearing HBV in chronic carriers.

The effect of lamivudine therapy in hepatic decompensation during acute exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Severe acute exacerbation (AE) of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) can lead to hepatic decompensation and death. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of lamivudine therapy in hepatic decompensation during such AEs.

METHODS

In a 10-month period, a total of 60 consecutive AE patients with jaundice and prolonged prothrombin time over 3s were treated with lamivudine 150 mg daily. As a historical control, another 31 CHB patients with AE resulting in hepatic decompensation hospitalized in an immediate past 6-month period were enrolled for comparison.

RESULTS

Patients in both groups were comparable in clinical and biochemical features. After a median treatment period of 6 weeks (range 1-48 weeks), all of the 25 patients with pretherapy bilirubin level < 20 mg/dl in the treatment group survived, while five (25%) of 20 patients in the control group died (P=0.013; odds ratios, 2.667; 95% confidence interval, 1.787-3.979). However, the mortality rate was similar in patients with pretherapy bilirubin level > or =20 mg/dl in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that lamivudine may prevent fatality in CHB patients with hepatic decompensation if therapy starts early enough or before serum bilirubin level rise over 20 mg/dl, but helps little if serum level already risen over that level.

Lamivudine treatment failure in preventing fatal outcome of de novo severe acute hepatitis B in patients with haematological diseases

BACKGROUND

Patients with malignant haematological diseases administered or no longer receiving immunosuppressive therapy are at high risk of reactivation or de novo hepatitis B infection and fulminant hepatitis. Despite promising results in the treatment of chronic hepatitis and its use in selected patients with acute hepatitis B, there is no consensus on lamivudine treatment in severe acute hepatitis portending a fatal clinical outcome.

CASE REPORTS

Of the ten patients with malignant haematological disorders who became infected with the same strain of hepatitis B virus during hospitalisation in a haematology ward, five received lamivudine (and in some cases, ganciclovir and famciclovir). The other patients received only supportive therapy, since deteriorating clinical conditions hampered specific treatment efforts. Eight patients died from acute liver failure and one from a fatal course of the haematological disease; one had a favourable outcome from the therapy. There was no significant difference in terms of survival between the treated and untreated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Although lamivudine has proved promising in the therapy of chronic hepatitis B and of recurrent hepatitis after liver transplantation, its use in de novo severe acute hepatitis should be investigated further, particularly in immunocompromised patients.

Incubation phase of acute hepatitis B in man: dynamic of cellular immune mechanisms

After hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, liver injury and viral control have been thought to result from lysis of infected hepatocytes by virus-specific cytotoxic T cells. Patients are usually studied only after developing significant liver injury, and so the viral and immune events during the incubation phase of disease have not been defined. During a single-source outbreak of HBV infection, we identified patients before the onset of symptomatic hepatitis. The dynamics of HBV replication, liver injury, and HBV-specific CD8+ and CD4+ cell responses were investigated from incubation to recovery. Although a rise in alanine transaminase (ALT) levels was present at the time of the initial fall in HBV-DNA levels, maximal reduction in virus level occurred before significant liver injury. Direct ex vivo quantification of HBV-specific CD4+ and CD8+ cells, by using human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I tetramers and intracellular cytokine staining, showed that adaptive immune mechanisms are present during the incubation phase, at least 4 weeks before symptoms. The results suggest that the pattern of reduction in HBV replication is not directly proportional to tissue injury during acute hepatitis B in humans. Furthermore, because virus-specific immune responses and significant reductions in viral replication are seen during the incubation phase, it is likely that the immune events central to viral control occur before symptomatic disease.

Lamivudine. A review of its therapeutic potential in chronic hepatitis B

Lamivudine is a deoxycytidine analogue that is active against hepatitis B virus (HBV). In patients with chronic hepatitis B, lamivudine profoundly suppresses HBV replication. Clinically significant improvements in liver histology and biochemical parameters were obtained with lamivudine in double-blind, randomised, trials in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients with chronic hepatitis B and compensated liver disease. After 52 weeks of treatment, relative to placebo (< or = 25%), significantly more Chinese (56%) or Western patients (52%) treated with lamivudine 100 mg/day had reductions of > or = 2 or more points in Knodell necro-inflammatory scores. Moreover, significantly fewer lamivudine 100 mg/day than placebo recipients had progressive fibrosis in liver biopsies (< or = 5 vs > or = 15%) and fewer lamivudine- than placebo-treated patients progressed to cirrhosis (1.8 vs 7.1%). More lamivudine 100 mg/day than placebo recipients acquired antibodies to HBeAg after 52 weeks (16 vs 4% in Chinese patients and 17 vs 6% in Western patients). ALT levels normalised in significantly more lamivudine than placebo recipients enrolled in these trials. In HBeAg-negative, HBV DNA positive patients with compensated liver disease enrolled in a double-blind, randomised study, HBV DNA levels were suppressed to below the limit of detection (< 2.5 pg/ml) and ALT levels normalised in 63% and 6% of patients treated with lamivudine 100 mg/day or placebo for 24 weeks. Clinically significant improvements in liver histology were obtained in 60% of patients treated with lamivudine for 52 weeks in this study. Lamivudine 100 mg/day for 52 weeks produced similar or significantly greater improvements in liver histology and ALT levels than 24 weeks' treatment with lamivudine plus interferon-alpha. In liver transplant candidates with chronic hepatitis B and end-stage liver disease, lamivudine 100 mg/day alone, or in combination with hepatitis B immune globulin, generally suppressed HBV replication and appeared to protect the grafted liver from reinfection. Lamivudine 100 mg/day suppressed viral replication and improved liver histology in liver transplant recipients with recurrent or de novo chronic hepatitis B. Lamivudine 300 or 600 mg/day reduced HBV replication in HIV-positive patients. The incidence of adverse events in patients with chronic hepatitis B and compensated liver disease treated with lamivudine 100 mg/day or placebo for 52 to 68 weeks was similar. 3.1- to 10-fold increases in ALT over baseline occurred in 13% of patients during treatment with lamivudine 100 mg/day or placebo for 52 weeks. Post-treatment ALT elevations were more common in lamivudine than placebo recipients; however, these generally resolved spontaneously; < or = 1.5% of lamivudine- or placebo-treated patients experienced hepatic decompensation.

CONCLUSION

Lamivudine inhibits HBV replication, reduces hepatic necro-inflammatory activity and the progression of fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B, ongoing viral replication and compensated liver disease including HBeAg-negative patients. The drug also suppresses viral replication in liver transplant recipients and HIV-positive patients. Thus, lamivudine is potentially useful in a wide range of patients with chronic hepatitis B and ongoing viral replication.