High pre-treatment serum hepatitis B virus titre predicts failure of lamivudine prophylaxis and graft re-infection after liver transplantation

Antibody-Mediated Rejection and Recurrent Primary Disease: Two Main Obstacles in Abdominal Kidney, Liver, and Pancreas Transplants

The advances in acute phase care have firmly established the practice of organ transplantation in the last several decades. Then, the next issues that loom large in the field of transplantation include antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and recurrent primary disease. Acute ABMR is a daunting hurdle in the performance of organ transplantation. The recent progress in desensitization and preoperative monitoring of donor-specific antibodies enables us to increase positive outcomes. However, chronic active ABMR is one of the most significant problems we currently face. On the other hand, recurrent primary disease is problematic for many recipients. Notably, some recipients, unfortunately, lost their vital organs due to this recurrence. Although some progress has been achieved in these two areas, many other factors remain largely obscure. In this review, these two topics will be discussed in light of recent discoveries.

Prevention of HBV Recurrence After Liver Transplant: Long-Term Results

BACKGROUND

Antiviral therapy with or without hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) is a common strategy for the prevention of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection. But there is no consensus on management protocols, and long-term data are relatively rare on recurrence of HBV infection after liver transplantation using a nucleoside analogue and HBIG prophylaxis.

METHODS

We performed 56 liver transplants since June 2006. Among them, 32 liver recipients had liver cirrhosis associated with HBV, 9 with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and 23 without HCC. Three operative mortalities, 3 deaths within 1 year related to infection, and 1 follow-up loss less than 1 year were excluded from analysis. We analyzed 25 liver transplants retrospectively. We prevented HBV reinfection with entecavir or tenofovir lifelong with 7 days of daily intravenous HBIG, 10,000 units, including operative day, and then once a week for the next 3 weeks, and then once a month for 1 year. Afterward, 4000 or 6000 units every 2 or 3 months were given to maintain patients' serum hepatitis B antibody titer >200 mIU/mL.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up period for HBV reinfection was 120.3 months. No patients have had reinfection.

CONCLUSIONS

Lifelong HBIG and nucleoside is an excellent prevention strategy for HBV reinfection after liver transplant.

Review article: preventing hepatitis B graft infection in hepatitis B patients after liver transplantation: immunoglobulin vs anti-virals

BACKGROUND

A critical aspect of liver transplantation in hepatitis B patients is to prevent graft reinfection with hepatitis B virus. The use of hepatitis B immune globulin after transplant was a significant milestone, which allowed prolonged graft and patient survival by controlling hepatitis B reinfection in liver grafts. The development of anti-viral treatments with oral nucleos(t)ide analogues, led to a further reduction in graft reinfection and improvement in patient survival. The combination of the aforementioned two therapies has been widely used in hepatitis B-associated liver transplants.

AIMS

To address the post-transplant management of hepatitis B and provide updates on preventing graft reinfection.

METHODS

We performed a literature search on Ovid and PubMed for randomised controlled trials or cohort studies in English, which investigated the effectiveness of hepatitis B immune globulin and anti-viral therapy on hepatitis B-associated transplants (1/2000-1/2020). Studies that met pre-established criteria were reviewed.

RESULTS

Based on currently available evidence, an algorithm for post-transplant management with anti-viral therapy is proposed. Also, the management of recipients who received grafts from hepatitis B core antibody-positive donors is discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

The development of hepatitis B immune globulin and anti-viral treatments led to substantial improvement in graft and patient survival. The prevention of hepatitis B graft reinfection is complex and involves a broad interdisciplinary team.

Prevention of HBV Recurrence after Liver Transplant: A Review

Globally, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is recognized as a major risk factor for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma, and HBV-induced liver failure is one of the leading indications for liver transplantation. Until about two decades ago, liver transplantation in patients with chronic HBV infection was a relative contraindication, due to high risk of viral replication with the use of immunosuppressants which could result in graft infection. In the 1990s, hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) use significantly reduced the risk of graft infection, improving outcomes of liver transplant in patients with chronic HBV infection. However, very high costs, especially with the need for long-term use, became a major concern. With the advent of nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs), there was less need for high-dose, long-term HBIg use to prevent HBV recurrence. Lamivudine was initially used but resistance soon became a major issue. This was followed by more potent NAs, such as entecavir and tenofovir, emerging as the more preferred agents. Additionally, the use of these antiviral agents (HBIg and/or NAs) have made it possible to use the grafts from donors with positivity for hepatitis B core antibody, allowing for expansion of the donor pool. Nevertheless, there is no consensus on management protocols, which vary significantly amongst centers. In this review, we appraise studies on management strategies used and the role of active vaccination in the prevention of HBV recurrence in post-liver transplant patients.

Efficacy and safety of Niuliva® immune globulin to prevent hepatitis B reinfection in de novo orthotopic liver transplant

Aims: To determine efficacy and safety of intravenous hepatitis B immune globulin (Niuliva®, Grifols) to prevent reinfection in de novo orthotopic liver transplantation. Patients & methods: In a nonrandomized, noncontrolled and Phase III clinical trial, 15 adult patients (12 men) were treated with Niuliva from the anhepatic phase (10,000 IU/daily 1 week postsurgery) up to 6 or 12 months (5000 IU/weekly 1 month; 5000 IU/monthly thereafter). Results: No patients showed reinfection throughout the study. Niuliva was effective in maintaining antibody titers above the thresholds recommended by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) to prevent reinfection (100–150 IU/l). Four serious adverse events were reported in three patients (none related to the study product). There were no seroconversions and no deaths. Conclusion: Long-term, high-dose Niuliva administration was safe and effective to prevent graft reinfection in the tested patients.

Antiviral Therapy for AECHB and Severe Hepatitis B (Liver Failure)

This chapter describes the principles of antiviral therapy, treatment strategies, medications and recommendations for AECHB, HBV-ACLF, HBV-related liver cirrhosis, HBV-related HCC, and liver transplantation.

Severe exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B is closely related to continuous HBV replication. Therefore, inhibiting HBV replication to reduce viral load may block disease progression and improve the quality of life of these patients. ETV or TDF has been recommend first-line drug for the treatment of AECHB.

A hyperactive immune response due to continuous HBV replication is the main mechanism for development of severe hepatitis B. In addition to comprehensive treatment, early administration of potent nucleoside analogs can rapidly reduce HBV DNA concentration, relieve immune injury induced by HBV, and reduce liver inflammation and patient mortality. Antiviral agents have become important in the treatment of severe exacerbation of chronic hepatitis B.

Long-term antiviral treatment with nucleoside analogs can delay or reverse the progress of liver cirrhosis. Virologic response, viral resistance and adverse drug reactions should be closely monitored during treatment. The treatment should be optimized for maximum effect based on each patient’s responses.

Effective antiviral therapy can suppress HBV replication and reduce the incidence of HBV-related HCC. Patients with HBV-related HCC should receive individualized and optimal multidisciplinary comprehensive treatment. Anti-viral drugs with high efficacy, low resistance and low adverse drug reactions should be selected to improve the patient’s quality of life and prolong survival time.

Methods to prevent HBV reinfection after liver transplantation include passive immunization (HBIG), antiviral treatment (nucleoside analogs) and active immunization (hepatitis B vaccine).

Clinical trials involving sequential combination therapy with NUC and Peg-IFN have shown statistically significant decline in HBsAg levels on treatment and high rates of sustained post-treatment serologic response. Combination therapy with novel DAA and immunotherapeutic approach may hold promise to overcome both cccDNA persistence and immune escape, representing a critical step towards HBV cure.

Long-term safety and efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate substitution for hepatitis B immunoglobulin following liver transplantation

Background and Aims

Limitations to the use of long‐term Hepatitis B Immunoglobulin (HBIg) following liver transplantation for hepatitis B (HBV) have led to the substitution of HBIg with oral nucleo(s)tide analogue prophylaxis. We prospectively assessed the long‐term safety and efficacy of switching to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) from HBIg.

Methods

An open‐label, multicenter switch study was conducted to evaluate the substitution of TDF for HBIg whilst continuing lamivudine (LAM) therapy in preventing the recurrence of HBV in patients who had been maintained as hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)‐negative posttransplantation for at least 12 months.

Results

Eighteen patients were enrolled (median age 66 years, range 42–78 years); 84% were male, and 78% on calcineurin inhibitors. Median time after transplantation was 14 years (range 5–19), and median duration of HBIg/LAM prior to the switch was 10 years (range 1–14). Median follow‐up was 5 years (range 5–8). Of 18 patients, 16 (89%) remained HBsAg and HBV DNA negative at the end of follow‐up. Two patients had re‐emergence of HBsAg without a detectable HBV DNA and no clinical sequelae. Creatinine clearance significantly reduced (median 59 mL/min to 51 mL/min, P = 0.03), necessitating dose reduction of TDF in six (33%) participants, with two eventually ceasing TDF. One patient switched back to HBIg by choice. All patients who changed therapy maintained an undetectable HBsAg.

Conclusion

Substitution of HBIg with TDF in patients on LAM is well tolerated and effective for the long‐term prevention of HBV recurrence posttransplantation. Renal dysfunction occurs frequently in the posttransplant setting and can require dose adjustment of TDF or change of therapy.

Liver transplantation and hepatitis B virus infection: towards an immunoglobulin-free antiviral treatment after transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article provides an update on the latest development on deploying oral nucleosides in an immunoglobulin-free regime against hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Entecavir and tenofovir are the two newer oral nucleosides that are associated with a low virological rebound rate at less than 2% at 5 years. As a result, they have been applied as standalone treatment against HBV recurrence after liver transplantation without immunoglobulin. Recent evidence has shown that a hepatitis B surface antigen seroclearance rate of 86% and 91% after 1 and 2 years was achievable with entecavir monotherapy. Moreover, none of the patients had histological graft damage because of HBV recurrence and an overall survival over 80% at 7 years has been reported.

SUMMARY

With newer and more potent oral nucleos(t)ide (NA) available, a hepatitis B immune globulin-free regimen after liver transplantation has become safe and feasible for suppression of HBV recurrence after liver transplantation, and for avoidance of HBV-related graft complications.

Rational Basis for Optimizing Short and Long-term Hepatitis B Virus Prophylaxis Post Liver Transplantation: Role of Hepatitis B Immune Globulin

Antiviral therapy using newer nucleos(t)ide analogues with lower resistance rates, such as entecavir or tenofovir, suppress hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication, improve liver function in patients with compensated or decompensated cirrhosis, and delay or obviate the need for liver transplantation in some patients. After liver transplantation, the combination of long-term antiviral and low-dose hepatitis B Immune globulin (HBIG) can effectively prevent HBV recurrence in greater than 90% of transplant recipients. Some forms of HBV prophylaxis need to be continued indefinitely after transplantation but, in patients with a low-risk of HBV recurrence (i.e., HBV DNA levels undetectable before transplantation), it is possible to discontinue HBIG and maintain only long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue(s) therapy. A more cautious approach is necessary for those patients with high pretransplant HBV DNA levels, those with limited antiviral options if HBV recurrence occurs (i.e., HIV or hepatitis D virus coinfection, preexisting drug resistance), those with a high risk of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence, and those at risk of noncompliance with antiviral therapy. In this group, HBIG-free prophylaxis cannot be recommended.

The combination of long-term antiviral and low-dose Hepatitis B Immune globulin (HBIG) can effectively prevent HBV recurrence in > 90% of liver transplant recipients. In patients with low HBV DNA levels, nucleos(t)ide analogue(s) treatment without HBIG is possible.

Prevention and Treatment of Recurrent Hepatitis B after Liver Transplantation

Chronic hepatitis B is a global health problem that leads to development of various complications, such as cirrhosis, liver cancer, and liver failure requiring liver transplantation. The recurrence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) post-liver transplantation is a major cause of allograft dysfunction, cirrhosis of the allograft, and graft failure. Patients with high viral load at the time of transplantation, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positivity, or those with a history of anti-viral drug resistance are considered as high-risk for recurrent HBV post-liver transplantation, while patients with low viral load, including HBeAg negative status, acute liver failure, and hepatitis D virus (HDV) co-infection are considered to be at low-risk for recurrent HBV post-liver transplantation. Antivirals for patients awaiting liver transplantation(LT) cause suppression of HBV replication and reduce the risk of recurrent HBV infection of the allograft and, therefore, all HBV patients with decompensated cirrhosis should be treated with potent antivirals with high genetic barrier to resistance (entecavir or tenofovir) prior to liver transplantation. Prevention of post-liver transplantation recurrence should be done using a combination of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and antivirals in patients at high risk of recurrence. Low dose HBIG, HBIG-free protocols, and monoprophylaxis with high potency antivirals can still be considered in patients at low risk of recurrence. Even, marginal grafts from anti-HBc positive donors can be safely used in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) negative, preferably in anti-hepatitis B core (HBc)/anti-hepatitis B surface (HBs) positive recipients. In this article, we aim to review the mechanisms and risk factors of HBV recurrence post-LT in addition to the various treatment strategies proposed for the prevention of recurrent HBV infection.

Treatment of patients with HBV-related decompensated cirrhosis and liver transplanted patients

Antiviral therapy using newer nucleos(t)ide analogs with lower resistance rates could suppress hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication, improve liver function in patients with compensated or decompensated cirrhosis, delay or obviate liver transplantation in some patients, and reduce the risk of HBV recurrence. Some form of HBV prophylaxis needs to be continued indefinitely posttransplant. However, in patients with a low-risk of HBV recurrence it is possible to discontinue hepatitis B immunoglobulins and maintain long-term nucleos(t)ide analog therapy. Currently, treatment of posttransplantation hepatitis B is a less important clinical problem than it was historically because effective antiviral therapies exist to rescue patients who failed initial prophylaxis.

Hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation: a single center experiences and review the literature

BACKGROUND

Despite the advances in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, liver transplantation (LT) remains the only hope for many patients with end-stage liver diseases resulting from HBV.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the rate of HBV recurrence in cases that had undergone LT due to the HBV related liver cirrhosis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-nine patients who underwent LT due to HBV related cirrhosis since 2001 to 2009 in Shiraz Organ Transplantation Center were enrolled in the present study. They were asked to complete the planned questionnaire and also to sign the informed consent in order to take part in this study. Post-transplant prophylaxis protocol against HBV recurrence was based on a hundred milligrams of lamivudine daily plus intramuscular injections of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) with appropriate dosage to keep anti-HBs antibody titer above 300 IU/L and 100 IU/L in the first six months and afterwards, respectively. Blood samples were obtained and checked for HBsAg, HBeAg, and the titers of Anti -HBsAb as well as Anti- HBeAb with ELISA. A quantitative HBV DNA assay was also done on all samples (GENE-RAD® Real-time PCR).

RESULTS

There were 91.8% males and 8.2% females enrolled in the study. The duration of post-transplant prophylaxis ranged from 3 months to 8 years (mean 18.9 ± 19.3 months). HBsAg and HBeAg were positive in 24.5% and 2% of cases, respectively. Real-time PCR for HBV DNA were zero copies/mL in 91.8% of patients, none of which represented a positive value for HBV recurrence (Positive > 10,000 copies/mL). The mean Anti-HBs Ab titer was 231.7 ± 135.9 IU/L; it was above 100 IU/L in 71.4% of patients. Thirty-seven (75.5%) of the patients were taking tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil, 6 (12.2%) were on cyclosporine plus mycophenolate mofetil, and 6 (12.2%) were taking sirolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil. HBsAg was detectable in seven patients taking tacrolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil (18.9%), in four patients taking cyclosporine plus mycophenolate mofetil (66.7%), and in one patient among the six who were taking sirolimus plus mycophenolate mofetil (16.7%). There was no significant statistical correlation between the presence of a positive value for HBsAg and the immunosuppression regimen or Anti HBsAb titer (P ˃ 0.05). Presence of a positive value for HBsAg was not predictive of a positive HBV DNA or its level in blood (P ˃ 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Post-transplant HBV prophylaxis with lamivudine and intramuscular HBIG with appropriate dosage to keep anti-HBs antibody titer above 300 IU/L in the first six months and above 100 IU/L afterwards is effective for prevention of HBV recurrence after LT.

Clinical study on prevention of HBV re-infection by entecavir after liver transplantation

PURPOSE

This aims to evaluate the effects of lamivudine (LAM) and entecavir (ETV) in preventing hepatitis B virus (HBV) re-infection after liver transplantation (LT).

METHODS

A retrospective matched case-control method was used in this study. From June 2005 to May 2007, the patients who received LAM (100 mg qd) or ETV (0.5 mg qd) were chosen. The LAM and ETV groups were matched using a 3:1 ratio based on the factors, such as age, gender, LAM or ETV antiviral duration, primary disease, and HBV DNA levels at the initiation of antiviral therapy. Data on serum HBV markers, HBV DNA, and cumulative recurrence were collected.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fifty-two patients were enrolled. The average duration of follow-up was 38.5 and 41.2 months (LAM and ETV groups) (p>0.05). Duration of pre-operative antiviral therapy was 30.3 and 25.8 d (LAM and ETV groups) (p>0.05). The HBV DNA level decreased from 3.89×10(6) to 5.31×10(5) copies/mL before LT in the LAM group, and decreased from 8.74×10(6) to 5.49×10(4) copies/mL in the ETV group (p<0.05). Eighteen patients in LAM group developed HBV re-infection and 0 in ETV group.

CONCLUSION

ETV is superior to LAM for preventing HBV re-infection following LT.

Prevention of post liver transplant HBV recurrence

BACKGROUND

Twenty years ago, liver transplantation for hepatitis B had been a relative contraindication to universal HBV recurrence and poor outcomes. Over the ensuing two decades, there has been refinement of prevention strategies in order to minimize HBV recurrence in the allograft.

RESULTS

Currently, the most efficacious and cost-effective strategies include newer oral antiviral drugs in combination with low doses of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG). More recently, strategies have been successful in withdrawing HBIG and newer approaches of HBIG avoidance are currently under development.

CONCLUSION

Thus, 20 years afterward, HBV recurrence is <5% and outcomes following liver transplantation are excellent.

Prevention of hepatitis B recurrence in liver transplant patients using oral antiviral therapy without long-term hepatitis B immunoglobulin

BACKGROUND

Small studies have suggested that nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy (NAT) with reduced hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) duration may be efficacious in preventing post-liver transplantation (LT) HBV recurrence.

OBJECTIVES

This larger study evaluates the use of NAT with short term (< 6 mo) or no HBIG for prevention of post-LT HBV recurrence.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All HBV patients undergoing LT at a university transplant center between 2002 and 2007 were identified retrospectively. Patient demographics, medication regimen, and adverse events were noted. The primary endpoint was HBV recurrence and secondary endpoints were graft and patient survival.

RESULTS

28 study patients were identified. Of these 28 patients, 4 (14%) received no HBIG, 6 (22%) received only inpatient HBIG, and 18 (64%) received inpatient HBIG and outpatient HBIG. 16 of the 28 patients (57%) received combination NAT and 12 patients (43%) received single NAT. At a median time of 15.5 months (range 9-24 months) post-LT, 4 of the 28 patients (14%) had recurrent HBV. Of those patients with recurrent HBV, 3 received both inpatient and outpatient HBIG and 1 received no HBIG. All cases of HBV recurrence were associated with noncompliance.

CONCLUSIONS

NAT with short-term or no HBIG was efficacious and safe in preventing post-LT HBV. All compliant patients were HBV-free, including 9 patients who received no HBIG or only inpatient HBIG. Additional studies using NAT without HBIG appear justified.

One-year vaccination against hepatitis B virus with a MPL-vaccine in liver transplant patients for HBV-related cirrhosis

Conflicting results have been reported on vaccination against hepatitis B virus (HBV) as a prophylaxis against viral recurrence after liver transplantation. We investigated the efficacy of 1-year, monthly vaccination using an adjuvant 3-deacylated monophosphoryl-lipid-A (MPL) recombinant S vaccine initially administered together with hepatitis B immunoglobulins (HBIg) in 18 patients transplanted for HBV-related cirrhosis. All received 12 vaccine doses (HBsAg, 20 mcg plus MPL, 50 mcg): the initial six doses (phase I) were administered within 7days after intravenous HBIg (2000IU), while the last 6 (phase II) following HBIg withdrawal. All patients received lamivudine during the study. Anti-HBs titers were determined before each dose and then for 1year after vaccination. After phase I anti-HBs titers were greater than 100IU/l in all patients and in three (16.6%) were greater than 500IU/l. After phase II 10 patients (55.5%) achieved anti-HBs titers greater than 100IU/l and five (27.7%) greater than 500IU/l. One year after vaccination eight patients (44.4%) maintained anti-HBs titers greater than 100IU/l, with a median titer of 234IU/l (102-1205), and 2 (11.1%) greater than 500IU/l. One-year extended monthly vaccination with a MPL-adjuvant recombinant vaccine induces a sustained protective anti-HBs response in approximately half of transplant recipients.

Impact of virologic breakthrough and HBIG regimen on hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation

The availability of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) and several oral antiviral therapies has reduced but not eliminated hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence. We aimed to determine the rate of HBV recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in relation to virologic breakthrough pre-OLT and HBIG regimens post-OLT. Data from the NIH HBV-OLT database were analyzed. A total of 183 patients transplanted between 2001 and 2007 followed for a median of 42 months (range 1-81) post-OLT were studied. At transplant, 29% were hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) (+), 38.5% had HBV DNA > 5 log(10) copies/mL, 74% were receiving antiviral therapy. Twenty-five patients experienced virologic breakthrough before OLT. Post-OLT, 26%, 22%, 40% and 12% of patients received intravenous (IV) high-dose, IV low-dose, intramuscular low-dose and a finite duration of HBIG, respectively as maintenance prophylaxis. All but two patients also received antiviral therapy. Cumulative rates of HBV recurrence at 1 and 5 years were 3% and 9%, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that listing HBeAg status and HBV DNA level at OLT were the only factors associated with HBV recurrence. In conclusion, low rates of HBV recurrence can be accomplished with all the HBIG regimens used when combined with antiviral therapy including patients with breakthrough pre-OLT as long as rescue therapy is administered pre- and post-OLT.

Chronic rejection of the liver: the role of immunosuppression

Liver transplantation is now widely recognised as an effective treatment option for patients with advanced liver disease. Many units now achieve greater than 85% survival at 1 year, with the majority of patients having a high quality of life. The maintenance of a high quality of life requires careful clinical management to ensure that the continued maintenance of excellent liver graft function is not achieved at the expense of immunosuppressive drug complications or morbidity. Acute liver rejection will occur in between 30 to 45% of patients, although with modern immunosuppressive protocols, usually combining one of the calcineurin agents, either cyclosporin or tacrolimus, with both azathioprine and corticosteroids (prednisolone) ensures that relatively few grafts are lost from severe acute rejection. While the incidence and severity of acute rejection may be one factor in raising the risk of chronic rejection, it may not be the principal one in many patients. It is important to recognise that the frequency of rejection also varies with the primary underlying liver disease, with patients with hepatitis B or alcoholic liver disease having relatively low rejection rates, compared with patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) or primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), which range between 20 to 70%. Chronic rejection will account for some 5% of grafts lost in the first 3 to 5 years. Indeed, there is some evidence that the incidence of chronic rejection is actually declining over the past few years. While the reason for this apparent decline is uncertain, and it could relate to better immunosuppression management, or more likely to the growing recognition that chronic graft dysfunction may be due to recurrent liver disease, such as autoimmune hepatitis, PBC, PSC, or recurrent hepatitis C. The differentiation of recurrent primary liver disease from chronic rejection can prove to be very difficult in clinical practice. Thus, the clinician must carefully monitor liver and graft function, evaluate any biochemical changes, and try to reach a clear diagnosis before considering any modification of immunosuppressive schedules.

Post-liver transplant hepatitis B prophylaxis: the role of oral nucleos(t)ide analogues

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The established gold standard for prophylaxis against hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence post-liver transplant is combination hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) and lamivudine. This therapy reduces the risk of recurrence to less than 5% at 5 years; however, the cost of HBIG has led to the investigation of alternatives. This paper reviews the HBIG-sparing alternatives achieved with lamivudine and the prospects for the newer anti-HBV agents in post-liver transplant prophylaxis.

RECENT FINDINGS

When used with lamivudine as part of combination prophylaxis, low-dose intramuscular HBIG is equivalent to high-dose intravenous HBIG. There is recent evidence that in patients receiving HBIG/lamivudine, HBIG can be replaced with adefovir dipivoxil at 6-12 months post-liver transplant without precipitating recurrence. Furthermore, a recent study showed that primary prophylaxis with combination adefovir/lamivudine therapy without the use of long-term HBIG was effective and well tolerated as primary prophylaxis.

SUMMARY

Although there are few studies of potent newer anti-HBV agents such as entecavir or tenofovir being used as HBV prophylaxis, the properties of these drugs suggest that they should replace lamivudine within HBV prophylaxis regimes.

Liver transplantation for hepatitis B: what is the best hepatitis B immune globulin/antiviral regimen?

1. Prophylaxis using the combination of lamivudine and high-dose intravenous hepatitis B immunoglobulin (approximately 10,000 IU monthly) reduces the long-term risk of recurrence of hepatitis B in hepatitis B surface antigen-positive transplant recipients to 5% to 10%. However, this therapy is expensive and inconvenient for patients. 2. Recent studies have shown that similar results can be obtained, at far less cost, with much lower doses of intramuscular hepatitis B immune globulin (400-800 IU monthly) in combination with pretransplant and posttransplant lamivudine therapy. 3. The development of lamivudine resistance pre-transplant can lead to hepatic decompensation and increases the risk of posttransplant recurrence in patients receiving hepatitis B immune globulin/lamivudine prophylaxis. Newer nucleos(t)ide analogues with lower resistance rates such as entecavir, adefovir, and tenofovir should therefore replace lamivudine in hepatitis B prophylaxis. 4. Combination therapy with these newer agents and low-dose intramuscular hepatitis B immune globulin is likely to be the most cost effective hepatitis B immune globulin-containing regimen for the prevention of hepatitis B recurrence post-transplant. 5. Some form of hepatitis B virus prophylaxis needs be continued indefinitely post-transplant. However, the use of antivirals with very low rates of drug resistance will make it possible to stop hepatitis B immune globulin therapy in many patients currently receiving hepatitis B immune globulin/nucleos(t)ide combination therapy.

Viral persistence after liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Prophylaxis to prevent recurrent HBV infection in liver transplant (LT) recipients has evolved over time, and we manage patients who receive lamivudine monoprophylaxis, lamivudine with HBV immunoglobulin (HBIg), and lamivudine and adefovir with HBIg.

METHODS

Serum was examined with sensitive assays to detect the persistence of HBV, and to identify mutations that might confer resistance to the antiviral prophylaxis. Forty patients were studied, and sera were collected 20 days to 13.3 years after LT.

RESULTS

Overall, HBV DNA was detected in serum of 67.5% of patients (8 of 10 of lamivudine monoprophylaxis patients, 15 of 24 of those receiving lamivudine and HBIg, and 4 of 6 of those receiving lamivudine, adefovir and HBIg). Thus, HBV infection persists for most of the patients despite successful prophylaxis after LT. Of those patients with detectable serum HBV DNA, three of eight of the lamivudine monoprophylaxis group had sequences associated with resistance to lamivudine (YMDD mutants), compared with only 1 of 15 of the lamivudine and HBIg cohort. Three of the lamivudine and HBIg cohort had the I126A Hepatitis B surface antigen escape variant. In those serum HBV DNA-positive patients who were receiving lamivudine, adefovir, and HBIg, only one of four had YMDD mutant, and none had Hepatitis B surface antigen escape variants. None of the 40 patients suffered clinical HBV recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Our observations imply that the selection of resistant virus may be essential, but is not sufficient to cause overt failure of prophylaxis with development of clinical disease. It seems likely that the patients' immune response contributes, at least partially, to the long-term control of infection in these patients.

Recurrent viral liver disease (hepatitis B and C) after liver transplantation

Hepatitis C represents more than 35% of liver transplant candidates worldwide. Meanwhile, hepatitis B continues to be an important cause of end-stage liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma in Asia and Africa. Recurrent viral liver disease is a significant event after liver transplantation and continues to be one of the main causes of graft dysfunction and loss in the middle and long-term follow-up. Mechanisms of liver reinfection and disease recurrence vary between these two viruses and pre-emptive as well as the therapeutic approaches are different. Hepatitis B patients can be managed with immune globulin immediately after liver transplant and various agents such as nucleotide and nucleoside analogues can be associated. As a result, disease recurrence has been delayed or prevented in these patients. Individuals transplanted for hepatitis C are known to have universal reinfection and a high rate of disease recurrence has been reported in the literature. Strategies to treat hepatitis C recurrence are limited to the use of pegylated interferon and ribavirin when disease is demonstrated histologically and biochemically, although other strategies have been described with limited or no success. We herein review the mechanisms of disease recurrence and the current as well as the future therapeutic approaches to prevent and to treat these diseases.

Viral hepatitis after liver transplantation

Recurrence of the original liver disease following liver transplantation is a typical complication in viral hepatitis. Recent advances, particularly the development of strategies to prevent or effectively treat hepatitis B, have led to substantial improvements in the post-transplantation outcome of hepatitis B candidates. While the efficacy of antivirals to treatrecurrent hepatitis C has improved in recent years, there is as yet no therapy to universally prevent recurrent infection, and tolerability of antivirals remains a matter of concern.

Prevention of hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation

Liver transplantation for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver disease has changed from a contraindication to outcomes comparable with non-HBV-related liver transplantations during the last two decades. Mainly the implementation of immunoprophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and the use of nucleoside analogs such as lamivudine and adefovir account for this dramatic change. The standard of care in most centers today consists of lamivudine treatment in replicating hepatitis B pre-orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) and a combination regimen of lamivudine and HBIG post-OLT. With adefovir, a potent antiviral drug became available in recent years that allows for the treatment of patients with lamivudine-resistant tyrosine-methionine-aspartate-aspartate (YMDD)-mutant HBV. In the transplantation setting, first studies indicate that a triple prophylactic therapy consisting of lamivudine, adefovir, and HBIG will become the standard of care for YMDD-mutant-related hepatitis B. With new drugs emerging for the treatment of chronic HBV, there is optimism for new options also in the transplant setting.

HBsAg level at time of liver transplantation determines HBsAg decrease and anti-HBs increase and affects HBV DNA decrease during early immunoglobulin administration

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Administration of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) initially after liver transplantation of hepatitis B patients is considered important to prevent reinfection reliably. However, dosing schedules differ considerably between centers. We measured HBsAg, anti-HBs and HBV DNA kinetics to create a rational basis for dosing schemes.

METHODS

Thirteen patients (group A) received 10,000 IU HBIG in the anhepatic phase followed by 10,000 IU daily until HBsAg became negative, whereas five patients (group B) received 20,000 IU followed by 5000 IU every 30 min.

RESULTS

HBsAg levels at time of transplantation ranged from 0.12 to 12,990 IU/ml. Correlations between initial HBsAg and HBIG required to decrease HBsAg below 1 IU/ml were high in groups A and B (r=0.97, p<0.001; r=1.00, p<0.001), as were correlations between initial HBsAg and HBIG required to raise anti-HBs above 1000 IU/l (r=0.94, p<0.001; r=1.00, p<0.001). In 11 HBV DNA-positive patients, DNA levels became negative in seven, and dropped by 2.5 log10 (mean) in the other four patients during immunoglobulin administration.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, required HBIG doses to decrease HBsAg and raise anti-HBs are determined by HBsAg levels at time of transplantation, not by HBV DNA levels. Shortened HBIG dosing intervals accelerate HBsAg decrease and anti-HBs increase. HBV DNA decreases rapidly during HBIG administration in most patients.

Short-term high-dose followed by long-term low-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin and lamivudine therapy prevented recurrent hepatitis B after liver transplantation

Hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) and lamivudine combination has been accepted as the best way to control hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation. However, the optimal dose of HBIg and the target titer of hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) remain unclear. We report our satisfactory experience with high-dose HBIg in the early period followed by low-dose HBIg with lamivudine. Subjects comprised five patients with fulminant hepatitis (FH) and 18 patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) who underwent liver transplantation. HBIg at a dosage of 200 IU/kg per day was administered for one week postoperatively. Thereafter, HBIg was administered only for HBsAb titer <100 IU/L. After six months, HBIg was withdrawn in FH and administered in LC only for HBsAb titer <10 IU/L. Lamivudine was administered to two FH and all LC cases. Although two patients with LC showed transient hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) recurrence, all patients remained HBsAg-negative at the final follow-up date. This method allows reliable and cost-effective control of hepatitis B recurrence.

Lamivudine plus low-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin to prevent recurrent hepatitis B following liver transplantation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

High-dose intravenous hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) may prevent recurrent hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, but the cost has limited its widespread use in countries with endemic HBV infection. We report on long-term safety and efficacy of an alternative strategy of very low doses (400-800 IU/month) of intramuscular (IM) HBIG plus lamivudine.

METHODS

Australian and New Zealand patients who received low-dose HBIG plus lamivudine following liver transplantation for HBV-related end-stage liver disease were studied. Prior to transplantation, patients with detectable serum HBV DNA received lamivudine 100 mg daily. Posttransplantation, all patients received lamivudine 100 mg daily plus IM HBIG 400 or 800 IU daily for 1 week then monthly thereafter. Serum HBV DNA levels were measured prior to lamivudine, at transplantation, and at 12 months posttransplantation. Serum titers of antibody to HBV surface antigen were measured at 1, 3, and 12 months posttransplantation.

RESULTS

Between February 1996 and October 2004, 147 patients received low-dose HBIG plus lamivudine. Thirty-one percent were hepatitis B e antigen positive, and 85% were HBV DNA+ prior to transplantation. The median duration of pretransplantation lamivudine was 92 days (range, 1-1775). Median follow-up posttransplantation was 1860 days. Kaplan-Meier patient survival was 92% at 1 year and 88% at 5 years. The actuarial risk of HBV recurrence was 1% at 1 year and 4% at 5 years. Baseline HBV DNA titer was associated with HBV recurrence.

CONCLUSION

Low-dose IM HBIG plus lamivudine provides safe and effective long-term prophylaxis against recurrent HBV at <10% the cost of the high-dose regimen.

Low risk of hepatitis B virus recurrence after withdrawal of long-term hepatitis B immunoglobulin in patients receiving maintenance nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence rates of 0-16% had been reported in patients maintained on nucleoside analogues (NA) after hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) discontinuation after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). However, follow-up in most studies was short. We aimed to determine the long-term risk of HBV recurrence using this strategy. All HBV patients who received > or =7 doses of intravenous HBIG after OLT, with no HBV recurrence while receiving HBIG, and who eventually discontinued HBIG and were maintained on NA, were included. HBV recurrence was defined as HBsAg-positive or HBV DNA > or =5 log copies/mL on 2 consecutive occasions. Twenty-one patients met the inclusion criteria. Immediate post-OLT prophylaxis was combination HBIG and NA in 15 patients, whereas 6 patients received HBIG monotherapy for 62-109 months before NA was added. HBIG was discontinued a median of 26 (range, 0.2-121) months after OLT. Median follow-up post-HBIG discontinuation was 40 (range, 5-51) months. Only 1 patient, who had 12 months of HBIG and was noncompliant to NA therapy, had HBV recurrence, 34 months after HBIG discontinuation. One patient had HBV DNA of 3.3 log copies/mL 47 and 48 months after HBIG discontinuation but remained HBsAg-negative. Lamivudine-resistant mutations were detected in both patients. Probability of HBV recurrence was 0% and 9% at 2 and 4 years after HBIG discontinuation. Three patients had 1-2 episodes of transiently detectable HBV DNA. All were HBV DNA and HBsAg negative on repeated tests over a period of 2-36 months. Maintenance therapy with NA after discontinuation of long-term HBIG therapy is associated with a low risk of HBV recurrence after OLT in compliant HBV patients.

Management of drug-resistant chronic hepatitis B

Lamivudine, adefovir, and entecavir are safe and effective orally administered inhibitors of hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication, but drug-resistant strains of HBV with point mutations in the HBV polymerase gene are being reported with prolonged treatment that can lead to viral rebound and serum alanine aminotransferase flares. Salvage treatment with antiviral agents including investigational nucleoside/nucleotide analogues is available but highlights the limitations and hazards of sequential antiviral monotherapy for chronic HBV. Studies of pegylated interferon combined with an antiviral agent or dual nucleoside/nucleotide combination therapy are awaited to minimize the incidence of drug-resistant HBV and improve long-term outcomes.

Prophylactic strategies for hepatitis B patients undergoing liver transplant: a cost-effectiveness analysis

Hepatitis B immunoglobulin with lamivudine prophylaxis (LAM/HBIG) is effective in preventing Hepatitis B (HBV) recurrence posttransplant but is expensive and inconvenient. Lamivudine-resistant HBV, which has limited the usefulness of lamivudine monoprophylaxis in transplant, can now be effectively controlled with adefovir dipivoxil. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis on the strategies of lamivudine prophylaxis with adefovir rescue(LAM/ADV) compared to combination LAM/intravenous fixed high-dose HBIG prophylaxis(LAM/ivHBIG) or LAM/intramuscular HBIG prophylaxis(LAM/imHBIG). Markov modeling was performed with analysis from societal perspective. Probability rates were derived from systematic review of the literature and cost taken from MEDICARE database. Outcome measures were incremental cost-effectiveness ratio(ICER) and cost to prevent each HBV recurrence and death. Analysis was performed at 5 years posttransplant as well as at end of life expectancy (15 years). Combination LAM/ivHBIG cost an additional USD562,000 at 15 years, while LAM/imHBIG cost an additional USD139,000 per patient compared to LAM/ADV. Although there is an estimated increase in recurrence of 53% with LAM/ADV and 7.6% increased mortality at the end of life expectancy (15 years), the ICER of LAM/ivHBIG over LAM/ADV treatment is USD760,000 per quality-adjusted life-years and for LAM/imHBIG, USD 188,000. Cost-effectiveness is most sensitive to cost of HBIG. Lamivudine prophylaxis with adefovir dipivoxil salvage offers the more cost-effective option for HBV patients undergoing liver transplant but with higher recurrence and death rate using a model that favors LAM/HBIG. Lowering the cost of HBIG maintenance will improve cost-effectiveness of LAM/HBIG strategy. In conclusion, a tailored approach based on individual risks will optimize the cost-benefit of HBV transplant prophylaxis.

Prevention of hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation

The reults of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatitis B virus (HBV) related liver disease are significantly influenced by the HBV recurrence rate. Complete eradication of hepatitis B is rarely possible after liver transplantation and hepatic and extrahepatic reservoirs are a continuous latent source of HBV recurrence. Therefore an adequate prophylaxis is mandatory. By introduction of long term passive immunoprophylaxis the recurrence rate could be markedly reduced and survival rates significantly improved. Due to the approval of antiviral drugs, especially lamivudine as the first approved antiviral agent against HBV, new prophylactic options, including combination prophylaxis, have been introduced. This modern antiviral managemant improved the outcome of hepatitis B patients after liver transplantation. The Results after OLT are nowadays reported to be as good or in a recent UNOS database report even better than in non-HBV patients. The type of recommended prophylaxis has undergone modifications within the last years and is still subject to changes due to the ongoing development of antiviral agents. In addition, due to high costs of hepatitis immunoglobulin alternatives such as prophylaxis with nucleos(t)ide analogues or vaccination are increasingly investigated. In the following, current strategies of reinfection prophylaxis and future perspectives are reviewed.

Review article: hepatitis B and liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is an excellent treatment for hepatitis B virus infected patients who have acute or chronic liver failure and/or primary liver cancer. Advances in antiviral prophylaxis prevent clinically significant graft re-infection for the majority of patients. Graft and patient survival has improved significantly during the past decade, and results of transplantation for hepatitis B virus are now superior to those achieved for most other indications. In particular, the availability of lamivudine and adefovir have transformed outcome. The addition of lamivudine to passive immunoprophylaxis with hepatitis B virus immunoglobulin prevents re-infection in most cases. Adefovir should be added to this combination when the patient develops lamivudine resistance before transplantation. The significance of serum hepatitis B virus DNA positivity in the absence of circulating hepatitis B surface antigen is uncertain. Hepatitis B virus infection of the graft can be observed when prophylaxis is inadequate, when the donor liver contains latent hepatitis B virus infection (so-called de novo infection from the hepatitis B virus core antibody positive donor), and when the donor is exposed to third party infection (sexual or nosocomial transmission). Established hepatitis B virus graft infection is a good indication for combination nucleoside analogue therapy. Combination therapy can achieve sustained suppression of viral replication, and hepatitis B e antigen and hepatitis B surface antigen clearance can also be observed.

Established and emerging therapies for the treatment of viral hepatitis

Patients who are chronically infected with either hepatitis B or C viruses run the risk of developing cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in later life. Antiviral treatment offers the only means of interrupting this progression. To date, recombinant interferon alpha and the nucleos(t)ide analogues lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil are the only licensed drugs for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B, whilst recombinant or pegylated interferons in combination with ribavirin are the ones used for chronic hepatitis C virus infections. The efficacy of these treatments, reasons for treatment failure, drug resistance and future options are discussed in the present review.

Drug insight: Nucleoside and nucleotide analog inhibitors for hepatitis B

In the past decade, substantial advances have been made in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Approved treatments include interferon-alpha, the nucleoside analog inhibitor lamivudine, and the nucleotide analog inhibitor adefovir dipivoxil. This review provides insights into the benefits and limitations of lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil have similar antiviral efficacies. Lamivudine has negligible side effects but a high rate of drug resistance, whereas adefovir dipivoxil has a low rate of drug resistance but long-term use is associated with a small risk of nephrotoxicity. Several other nucleoside and nucleotide analogs are being evaluated in phase II/III clinical trials for hepatitis B.

Transplantation of hepatitis B surface antigen-positive livers into hepatitis B virus-positive recipients and the role of hepatitis delta coinfection

The scarcity of liver donors requires consideration of grafts from sources not previously used. Allografts from hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-carriers without a significant liver disease have been proposed for liver transplant recipients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Combination prophylaxis schemes against HBV post-liver transplantation (LT) recurrence are currently available; the efficacy of those schemes in HBV-related cirrhosis and HCC must be assessed. This report describes the allocation of HBsAg-positive grafts in three HBsAg-positive recipients, with HBV-related cirrhosis and evolving HCC lesions, two of them with hepatitis Delta virus (HDV) coinfection. Patients were administered anti-hepatitis B immunoglobulins (HBIGs) and lamivudine in order to prevent HBV recurrence. In spite of anti-HBV prophylaxis, HBV infection did persist after LT in all patients (no serum clearance of HBsAg). HBV replication assessed by serum HBV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) presence was detected in the first month after LT in the 3 recipients. A prompt HDV reinfection with a clinical and histological pattern of hepatitis was observed in the 2 HBV / HDV coinfected recipients. In 1 of them, an evolving chronic hepatitis required a second LT. The non-HDV-infected patient showed an uneventful follow-up, but the lack of the neutralizing effect of HBIGs and the high risk of escape mutants forced the addition of adefovir-dipivoxil to lamivudine, in order to prevent viral variants and hepatitis recurrence. In conclusion, allografts from HBsAg-positive donors in HBsAg-positive recipients are associated with the persistence of the HBsAg after LT due to the failure of HBIG prophylaxis, even if lamivudine does inhibit virion production. This condition favors HDV replication and HDV hepatitis recurrence in coinfected patients. The allocation of HBsAg-positive grafts in HBsAg-positive recipients could be justified only in recipients without HDV coinfection and a combined prophylaxis with lamivudine and adefovir-dipivoxil is currently the best way to manage escape mutants in these recipients.

Outcome of lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus is generally benign except in cirrhotics

AIM: We set to determine factors that determine clinical severity after the development of resistance.

METHODS: Thirty-five Asian patients with genotypic lamivudine resistance were analyzed in three groups: 13/35 (37%) were non-cirrhotics with normal pre-treatment ALT (Group IA), 12/35 (34%) were non-cirrhotics with elevated pre-treatment ALT (Group IB), and 10/35 (29%) were cirrhotics (Group II). Patients were followed for a median of 98 wk (range 26-220) after the emergence of genotypic resistance.

RESULTS: Group IA patients tended to retain normal ALT. Group IB patients showed initial improvement of ALT with lamivudine but 9/12 patients (75%) developed abnormal ALT subsequently. On follow-up however, this persisted in only 33%. Group II patients also showed improvement while on treatment, but they deteriorated with the emergence of resistance with 30% death from decompensated liver disease. Pretreatment ALT levels and CPT score (in the cirrhotic group) were predictive of clinical resistance and correlated with peak ALT levels and CPT score.

CONCLUSION: The phenotype of lamivudine-resistant HBV correlated with the pretreatment phenotype. The clinical course was generally benign in non-cirrhotics. However, cirrhotics had a high risk of progression and death (30%) with the development of lamivudine resistance.

Prophylaxis of hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation in carriers of lamivudine-resistant mutants

The combination of lamivudine and hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) reduces the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT). However, the efficacy of this strategy and the need for combined therapy with adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) in patients who select lamivudine-resistant strains (YMDD) before surgery is still unknown. Twenty-two patients treated with lamivudine (LAM) who underwent LT after YMDD-mutant selection were studied. In 13 patients, YMDD mutants were associated with an HBV DNA breakthrough greater than 5 log10 (group A: phenotypic resistance), and 11 were treated with ADV to decrease viral load before LT. In the remaining 9 patients who did not experience the viral breakthrough, YMDD mutants were detected only retrospectively in sera stored at the time of LT (group B: genotypic resistance). During 35 months of post-LT follow-up, none of the 11 patients of group A treated with ADV before and after surgery (in addition to HBIG and LAM) had HBV recurrence, and neither did any of the 7 subjects of group B treated with LAM before and after transplantation (in addition to HBIG). HBV recurred in 2 patients of group A (untreated with ADV before surgery and transplanted with an HBV DNA exceeding 5 log10) and in 2 subjects of group B (who spontaneously stopped HBIG after surgery). In carriers of YMDD mutants, the risk of post-LT HBV recurrence is low, provided that preemptive and prophylactic ADV (in addition to LAM and HBIG) treatment is used in highly viremic patients and prophylactic LAM (or ADV) and HBIG therapy is continued in low viremic patients.

Viral load at the time of liver transplantation and risk of hepatitis B virus recurrence

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation is significantly reduced by prophylaxis with hepatitis B immune globulins (HBIG) or antiviral drugs in nonreplicating patients and by the combination of both drugs in replicating patients. However, the load of HBV DNA, which defines replicating status in patients undergoing liver transplantation, remains unclear. This study analyzes the correlation between the viral load, tested with a single amplified assay, at the time of liver transplantation, and the risk of hepatitis B recurrence in 177 HBV carriers who underwent transplantation in a single center from 1990 to 2002. Overall, HBV relapsed after surgery in 15 patients (8.5%) with a 5- and 8-year actuarial rate of recurrence of 8% and 21%, respectively. After liver transplantation hepatitis B recurred in 9% of 98 selected subjects treated only with immune globulins and in 8% of 79 viremic patients who received immune globulins and lamivudine (P = NS). A linear correlation was observed between recurrence and viral load at the time of surgery. In transplant patients with HBV DNA higher than 100,000 copies/mL, 200-99,999 copies/mL, and DNA undetectable by amplified assay, hepatitis B recurred in 50%, 7.5%, and 0% of patients, respectively. Overall, a viral load higher than 100,000 copies/mL at the time of liver transplantation was significantly associated with hepatitis B recurrence (P = .0003). In conclusion, spontaneous or antiviral-induced HBV DNA viral load at the time of surgery classifies the risk of HBV recurrence after liver transplantation and indicates the best prophylaxis strategy.

No hepatitis recurrence using combination prophylaxis in HBV-positive liver transplant recipients with YMDD mutants

Recurrence of hepatitis B impairs the outcome of liver transplantation (OLT). In serum hepatitis B virus (HBV)-DNA-positive recipients, prophylaxis using lamivudine and immunoglobulins (HBIg) reduces the risk of recurrence, but it is undefined whether this regimen also protects candidates with YMDD mutants. Seventeen OLT viraemic candidates received pre-emptive lamivudine followed by post-OLT prophylaxis with lamivudine and HBIg. Both sera and liver biopsies were prospectively collected and high-sensitive polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was applied for HBV-DNA detection. Finally, the presence of YMDD mutants was explored in all PCR-positive samples. All patients remained hepatitis B recurrence-free after a mean follow up of 32 months. By PCR, serum HBV-DNA was detectable in 64.3% of cases at OLT-baseline, in 64.7% under combined prophylaxis and in 58.8% in patients (70.5% of the total) with a minimum follow up of 24 months. At OLT-baseline, YMDD mutants were found in 44.4% of patients. After OLT, mutants were present in 50% of patients but only in 16.6% of cases in the long period. Although 41% of the native livers and 42.8% of the analysed grafts harboured HBV-DNA, YMDD mutants were detected in 57% of the native positive livers. YMDD mutants were largely detected both at OLT-baseline and post-OLT, but their presence decreased over time. Regardless of the presence of YMDD mutants, no hepatitis B recurrence was observed in our OLT recipients using pre-emptive lamivudine followed by continuous prophylaxis with lamivudine and HBIg.

Effects of long-term lamivudine therapy in renal-transplant patients

BACKGROUND

Following renal transplantation (RT), chronic immunosuppression is associated in hepatitis B virus (HBV) (+) patients with a flare-up of the disease, which might be harmful in the long term.

OBJECTIVES

We report on the effect of long-term lamivudine therapy given at an initial daily dose of 100mg in 18 HBV (+) RT patients.

RESULTS

When lamivudine therapy was commenced, 14 patients (77%) had an increase in their aspartate (AST) and alanine (ALT) aminotransferase levels. During a mean follow-up, under treatment, of 36.5 +/- 3.5 months (up to 66 months), 10 patients (55%) had a sustained partial (HBV DNA < 4 x 10(5)copies/ml) (n = 4) or complete (HBV DNA < 400 copies/ml) (n = 6) virological response. Overall, 12 virological breakthroughs were observed. Of those who were HBe Ag(+) prior to lamivudine therapy (n = 4), one seroconverted to HBe Ab during therapy. At the last follow-up, AST and ALT levels were normal in 13 patients. When liver biopsy was repeated during treatment (n = 15), the virological responders showed a significant decrease in total Knodell score from 10 +/- 0.6 to 7 +/- 1 (P = 0.04), but no significant change in the stage of fibrosis. Conversely, in those patients with high HBV DNA titers, there were no significant changes in the total Knodell score or in the grade of fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, lamivudine therapy is safe in HBV(+)ve renal-transplant patients. However, even if the full and partial virological response rates are still high (55%) in the long term, relapse or primary non-responses occur. The implementation of alternative efficient strategies is warranted.

Prophylaxis and treatment of hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation in the antiviral era

Redistribution of virions from extrahepatic reservoirs with resultant reinfection of the graft is a serious complication after liver transplantation for hepatitis B-related liver disease. Prophylaxis of hepatitis B virus recurrence is a major issue in these patients. With the introduction of passive immunoprophylaxis and the development of antiviral drugs, liver transplantation has evolved as an established therapy of hepatitis B-induced end-stage liver failure. However, even under indefinite monoprophylaxis, a significant percentage of patients develop reinfection due to a high mutation rate of the hepatitis B virus. Progress, especially in the field of antiviral therapy, has opened new strategies, including combination prophylaxis and therapy, which further improve outcome. On the other hand, the broad use of antiviral drugs brings about new problems such as resistance formation prior to liver transplantation. In addition, due to the high costs of hepatitis B immunoglobulin alternatives such as prophylaxis with nucleoside analogs or vaccination are increasingly being investigated.

Current therapies for chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Patients who are chronically infected with the hepatitis B virus are at an increased risk of developing cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation and hepatocellular carcinoma. Therapeutic intervention offers the only means of interrupting this progression. Currently there are three licensed agents for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. These are interferon-alpha, an immunomodulator, and two synthetic nucleos(t)ide analogs, namely lamivudine (Epivir, GlaxoSmithKline) and adefovir dipivoxil (Hepsera, Gilead Sciences). This review aims to summarize current experience with these drugs in the treatment and management of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection, their efficacy, and current problems of drug resistance. An outline of future treatment perspectives is also included.

Hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses in liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) for end-stage liver disease (ESLD) secondary to hepatitis viruses has evolved rapidly during the last two decades. ESLD secondary to hepatitis C virus (HCV) accounts for approximately 50% of LT in the United States and Europe. Despite the decrease in the number of new HCV infections, the prevalence of advanced HCV-related liver disease is steadily increasing. In light of the near universal recurrence of posttransplantation HCV infection and our limited ability to treat recurrent disease, transplantation is in danger of being overrun by viral hepatitis, unless effective strategies can be used to treat disease, expand the donor pool of available organs, and prevent disease recurrence. In the early 1980s, results of LT for chronic hepatitis B virus infection were hampered by recurrent infection and subsequent allograft failure. However, with the introduction of passive immunoprophylaxis with hepatitis B immunoglobulin and treatment with potent nucleoside analogs, there has been a resurgence of LT for hepatitis B virus-related ESLD. Despite the wide acceptance of LT as a therapy for ESLD, there is little consensus on the appropriate immunosuppressive regimens, and prophylactic and therapeutic treatments vary widely from one center to another. This review summarizes available data and highlights appropriate strategies to improve outcomes.

Prevention of hepatitis B virus recurrence after living donor liver transplantation

The emergence of lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B mutations is a major complication during pretransplantation treatment. The proper time to begin Lamivudine before transplantation is not yet known. Twenty-six patients received preoperative lamivudine treatment followed by combined lamivudine and hepatitis B immunoglobulin after transplantation up to December 2002. The length of preoperative lamivudine treatment ranged from 13 to 200 days (mean, 52 +/- 37 days). Hepatitis B virus-DNA was positive in 22 of 26 (84.6%) patients before preoperative lamivudine prophylaxis and persistently positive among only 4 of 22 patients (18%) who at transplantation did not show a viral mutation. In all patients, hepatitis B virus-DNA became negative immediately after transplantation. At a median follow-up of 34 months, neither a hepatitis B recurrence nor a mutation had occurred in any patient. The ability to schedule the proper time for preoperative lamivudine prophylaxis is an advantage of living donor liver transplantation.

Adefovir dipivoxil: review of a novel acyclic nucleoside analogue

Adefovir dipivoxil (ADF) is a novel acyclic nucleoside analogue that has recently been approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV). Adefovir was initially assessed at higher doses for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. However, in these studies, nephrotoxicity proved a dose-limiting side effect. Large randomised controlled studies have recently shown that ADF results in histological, virological and biochemical improvement in both hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and HBeAg-negative chronic HBV. While the rate of HBeAg seroconversion at 1 year (12%) was lower than both lamivudine and interferon, this increases with prolonged treatment. The clinical improvements occurred without serious side effects or the development of resistance at the dose of 10 mg daily, in treatment trials of up to 2 years, although resistance has now been observed. In addition, the drug is efficacious in HBV/HIV co-infection and hepatitis B-infected liver transplant recipients, particularly in those who have developed lamivudine resistance. ADF can be added as a treatment option to existing treatment options (interferon-alpha and lamivudine) and assumes a role in the ongoing management of chronic HBV. The optimal use of ADF as either a monotherapy or as part of combination therapy requires further assessment.

Antiviral therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B and cirrhosis

Chronic hepatitis B virus infection (HBV) may result in significant morbidity, including cirrhosis, end-stage liver disease, and hepatocellular carcinoma. The management of chronic HBV cirrhosis is advancing rapidly. Current treatment options for patients with HBV-related cirrhosis include interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha), lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil. IFN-a is used less commonly today because of its toxicity, difficulty with administration, and the availability of safer drugs. Lamivudine, an oral nucleoside analog, has proven to be at least as effective, and is safer, than IFN-a in the treatment of HBV-related cirrhosis. It is plagued by the development of resistant viral mutants, however. The newest oral nucleotide analog, adefovir dipivoxil, has shown excellent efficacy in treatment-naïve and lamivudine-resistant HBV patients and has lower rates of resistance in the short-term.

Outcome of liver transplantation for hepatitis B in the United States

Important innovations, such as hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) and lamivudine, have been introduced to the care of patients undergoing liver transplantation (OLT) for viral hepatitis B (HBV) (over the last 15 years). We analyzed survival of OLT recipients with HBV in the United States to examine the effect of these innovations. A retrospective analysis was conducted based on data collected prospectively by the United Network for Organ Sharing in all adult (older than 18) patients undergoing primary OLT in the United States between 1987 and 2002. OLT recipients with HBV were identified by the principal diagnosis of acute or chronic HBV or positive results on HBV markers. Patients were divided into Era 1 (1987-1991), Era 2 (1992-1996), and Era 3 (1997-2002). Era 1 consisted of 6,708 patients (675 with HBV), Era 2 consisted of 13,995 patients (1,005 with HBV), and Era 3 consisted of 20,730 patients (1,723 with HBV). More recent patients were older and had less advanced liver disease and shorter ischemic time. The survival of patients with HBV was significantly better for Era 2 than for Era 1 (P <.01) and for Era 3 than for Era 2 (P <.01). There was no difference in survival between patients with HBV and all other diagnoses for Era 3 (P =.14). In the multivariable analysis, the effect of these eras persisted when other variables such as recipient and donor age, warm ischemic time, pre-OLT disease severity, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) were taken into account. Unlike previous reports, fulminant disease and Asian race had no effect on patient survival. In conclusion, these data underscore the effectiveness of therapeutic innovations that have occurred in the past two decades and indicate timely and widespread adoption of these measures by transplant centers nationwide.

Management of Hepatitis B Patients with Antiviral Resistance

Drug resistance is an expected consequence of antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B because of the high rate of hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication, the lack of proofreading during reverse transcription of the pregenomic RNA and the low efficacy of available therapies in eliminating covalently closed circular HBV DNA. Mutations involving the YMDD motif of the catalytic domain of HBV reverse transcriptase have been reported in patients who have received lamivudine, emtricitabine and telbivudine. Drug-resistant mutations affecting other regions of HBV polymerase have also been reported, but at much lower rates in patients who have received adefovir dipivoxil or entecavir. Antiviral resistance is initially manifested as virological breakthrough infection. In most patients, this is followed by biochemical breakthrough and, in some patients, hepatitis flares and hepatic decompensation. Monitoring drug resistance may improve the management of patients with antiviral-resistant HBV and can guide the selection of salvage therapy. The optimal management of patients with antiviral-resistant HBV continues to evolve. The ideal approach is to prevent antiviral resistance through judicious use of antiviral therapy and the use of more potent antiviral agents, possibly in combination.