Hepatitis D virus reactivation in liver-transplanted patients receiving hepatitis B immunoglobulin

Background

The utility of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) in hepatitis D virus (HDV)-reactivation prophylaxis remains contentious. This study compared liver transplant (LT) patients based on whether they received perioperative HBIg to assess its protective effect against HDV reactivation.

Methods

Fifty-seven recipients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and HBV/HDV, who were at least 1 year posttransplantation as of January 1, 2021, were enrolled in this single-center study. Tests for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), anti-HDV antibody, and quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction for HBV DNA and HDV RNA were performed. Interviews were conducted to assess compliance with the nucleos(t) ide analogue (NA) regimen and to document preoperative HBV/HDV status. Liver function tests were also carried out. The nonparametric Mann-Whitney U-test was utilized to determine statistical significance, with P<0.05 considered significant. Data analysis was conducted using GraphPad Prism software.

Results

The prevalence of HDV RNA, HBV DNA, HBsAg, and anti-HDV positivity in the HBIg group (n=23) was 4.3% (n=1), 17.4% (n=4), 8.7% (n=2), and 95.7% (n=22), respectively. In the non-HBIg group (n=34), these rates were 5.9% (n=2), 8.8% (n=3), 11.8% (n=4), and 97.1% (n=33), respectively. Interviews revealed that all reactivations occurred in patients who were noncompliant with their NA regimen. Eleven of the 13 patients initially reported to be monoinfected with HBV pretransplantation were anti-HDV-positive.

Conclusions

No HDV replication occurred in either group due to spontaneous reactivation. High-efficacy NAs appear to be effective in sustaining HDV suppression post-LT. Most recrudescent cases of chronic hepatitis D are mild and self-limiting, typically resolving after 1-2 years of replication, as evidenced by liver function tests.

[17-year study on the curative effect of treatment to prevent the recurrence of hepatitis B in different risk groups after liver transplantation]

Objective: To observe the recurrence condition of hepatitis B in different risk groups after liver transplantation in an attempt to provide useful information on whether to discontinue hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) in the future at an early stage. Methods: The patient population was divided into high, low-risk, and special groups [especially primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)] according to the guidelines for the prevention and treatment of hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation. The recurrence condition and risk factors in this population were observed for hepatitis B. Measurement data were analyzed using a t-test and a rank-sum test. Count data were compared using a χ(2) test between groups. Results: This study finally included 532 hepatitis B-related liver transplant cases. A total of 35 cases had HBV recurrence after liver transplantation, including 34 cases that were HBsAg positive, one case that was HBsAg negative, and 10 cases that were hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA positive. The overall HBV recurrence rate was 6.6%. The recurrence rate of HBV was 9.2% and 4.8% in the high- and low-risk HBV DNA positive and negative groups before surgery (P = 0.057). Among the 293 cases diagnosed with HCC before liver transplantation, 30 had hepatitis B recurrence after surgery, with a recurrence rate of 10.2%. The independent related factors for the recurrence of hepatitis B in patients with HCC after liver transplantation were HCC recurrence (HR =181.92, 95%CI 15.99~2 069.96, P < 0.001), a high postoperative dose of mycophenolate mofetil dispersible tablets (MMF) ( HR =5.190, 95%CI 1.289~20.889, P = 0.020), and a high dosage of HBIG (HR = 1.012, 95%CI 1.001~1.023, P = 0.035). Among the 239 cases who were non-HCC before liver transplantation, five cases (recurrence rate of 2.1%) arouse postoperative hepatitis B recurrence. Lamivudine was used in all cases, combined with on-demand HBIG prophylaxis after surgery. There was no hepatitis B recurrence in non-HCC patients who treated with entecavir combined with HBIG after surgery. Conclusion: High-barrier-to-resistance nucleotide analogues combined with long-term HBIG have a good effect on preventing the recurrence of hepatitis B after liver transplantation. The discontinuation of HBIG may be considered at an early stage after administration of a high-barrier-to-resistance nucleotide analogue in low-risk patients. Domestically, the HBV infection rate is high, so further research is still required to explore the timing of HBIG discontinuation for high-risk patients, especially those with HCC.

A collaborative study to establish the second national standard for hepatitis B immunoglobulin in Korea

This study aimed to establish a second national standard for hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) that can be used for potency assays of hepatitis B and normal immunoglobulin. The candidate material was manufactured using a process approved as Good Manufacturing Practice. The freeze-dried candidate preparation was tested for physicochemical and biological properties, including pH, residual moisture, molecular size distribution, and potency. A collaborative study was performed involving four laboratories, including the National Institute of Food and Drug Safety Evaluation, as an official national control laboratory in Korea and manufacturers. The potency was calibrated against the second international standard for HBIG using two enzyme immunoassays: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Results from 240 assays were obtained from four laboratories, and combined potency estimates were obtained by calculating the geometric means. Intra- and inter-laboratory variability showed acceptable geometric coefficients of variation of 1.3-6.0 and 3.2-3.6%, respectively. The candidate preparation showed satisfactory stability in accelerated thermal degradation and real-time stability tests. Based on these results, the potency value of 105 IU/vial was assigned (95% confidence intervals: 100.0-109.2 IU/vial), and it was deemed suitable to serve as the Korean national standard for HBIG.

Use of Hepatitis B Virus-Positive Organs in Organ Transplantation

The significant morbidity and mortality of people with end-stage renal, liver, heart, and lung diseases in need of transplantation provides rationale for use of organs from donors who are hepatitis B positive. The recipient's hepatitis B status plays a key role in defining the prophylactic strategy. The availability of safe and effective therapies (hepatitis B antivirals and hepatitis B immune globulin) has contributed to the safety of using hepatitis B-positive donors. The outcomes in both liver and nonliver solid organ transplant recipients given hepatitis B-positive organs have been excellent if appropriate prophylactic therapies provided.

Cost-effectiveness and long-term outcomes of liver transplantation using hepatitis B core antibody-positive grafts with hepatitis B immunoglobulin prophylaxis in Korea

Background/Aims

Hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc)-positive donors are used as an extended donor pool, and current guidelines recommend the usage of nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) as prophylaxis for preventing de novo hepatitis B virus infection (DNH). We analyzed the long-term outcomes of a large cohort of liver transplantation (LT) patients receiving anti-HBc-positive grafts and evaluated the risk of DNH when hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) monotherapy was used as prophylaxis. We also compared the cost-effectiveness of HBIG and NAs.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 457 patients with anti-HBc-positive grafts and 898 patients with anti-HBc-negative grafts who underwent LT between January 2001 and December 2018. We compared recipient characteristics according to the anti-HBc status of the donor, and compared the costs of using NAs for the rest of the patient’s life and using HBIG to maintain hepatitis B surface antibody titers above 200 IU/L.

Results

The 1-, 5-, and 10-year patient survival rates were 87.7%, 73.5%, and 67.7%, respectively, in patients with anti-HBc-positive grafts, and 88.5%, 77.4%, and 70.3%, respectively, in patients with anti-HBc-negative grafts (P=0.113). Among 457 recipients with anti-HBc-positive grafts, 117 (25.6%) were non-HBV recipients. The overall incidence of DNH was 0.9%. When using HBIG under insurance coverage, the cumulative cost was lower compared with using NA continuously without insurance coverage in Korea.

Conclusions

Anti-HBc-positive grafts alone do not affect patient survival or graft survival. HBIG monoprophylaxis has good outcomes for preventing DNH, and the patient’s long-term cost burden is low in Korea because of the national insurance system in this cohort.

Reduced mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B after implementation of completely charge-free active-passive immunoprophylaxis: an observational cohort study

Objectives: China has implemented universal hepatitis B vaccination since 2002 and provided charge-free hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) to infants of HBV-infected mothers since July 2011. We aimed to compare mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) in children born before and since July 2011.Methods: In total, 5,149 children of HBV-infected mothers were tested for HBV markers. Group one contained 1,160 children born during August 2002-June 2011 and group two contained 3,989 children born during July 2011-June 2016.Results: In total, 92 (1.8%, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.4-2.2) children were infected with HBV. None (0%, 95%CI 0.0-0.1) of 3,716 children of mothers with negative hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) was infected, whereas 92 (6.4%, 95%CI 5.2-7.8) of 1,433 children of HBeAg-positive mothers were infected (p < 0.0001). Among children of HBeAg-positive mothers, MTCT occurred in 10.3% (19/185) (95%CI 6.3-15.6) in group one and 5.8% (73/1,248) (95%CI 4.6-7.3) in group two (p = 0.02).Conclusions: Implementing charge-free active-passive immunoprophylaxis greatly reduces MTCT of HBV in children of HBeAg-positive mothers, highlighting the importance of timely administration of both hepatitis B vaccine and HBIG to prevent MTCT. The still remaining MTCT suggests that reducing maternal virus load before delivery is an additional important measure.

[Comments on 2019 Chinese practice guideline for the prevention and treatment of hepatitis B virus mother-to-child transmission]

Recently, the Society of Infectious Diseases of Chinese Medical Association and Chinese GRADE Center jointly released the "2019 Chinese practice guideline for the prevention and treatment of hepatitis B virus mother-to-child transmission" . We concerned several issues in the Guideline, including the improper citation of some references, no recommendations for some key strategies for the prevention of hepatitis B virus mother-to-child transmission, insufficient or even lack of evidence for some recommendations and others. Based on the principle of academic contention, we present in this article our comments on the Guideline to discuss these issues with the Guideline's authors and readers.

The efficiency of low-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin plus nucleos(t)ide analogs in preventing posttransplant hepatitis B virus recurrence

Background/aim

In this study, the efficiency of using low-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) plus antiviral treatment according to individual needs has been evaluated in posttransplant hepatitis B virus (HBV) patients.

Materials and methods

We retrospectively evaluated 179 patients who were admitted between 2009 and 2014. Five thousand IU intravenous HBIG was given in the anhepatic phase, and 400 IU/day intramuscular (IM) HBIG was given in the posttransplant period. After HBsAg seroconversion, 400 IU IM HBIG was continued as prophylaxis every two weeks.

Results

The average follow-up period was 26 (2–65) months. Seventy patients had hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The HBV recurrence was 4.5% in the first year, and 5.8% in the third year. The HBsAg became negative in 11 (2–63) days, and anti-HBs became positive in 9 (1–31) days. HBsAg positivity occurred in 6 patients during the follow-up period. Five of these patients were those who underwent transplantation due to HCC. In 5 of the HCC patients, in whom HBsAg became positive, tumor recurrence was observed after 0.3–9.9 months. HBsAg positivity was more frequently detected in patients with HCC (P = 0.009).

Conclusion

The HBV recurrence should be evaluated as a predictor of the HCC recurrence in patients who were transplanted due to HCC.

Assessment of patient safety and the efficiency of facility utilization following simplified ultra-rapid intravenous infusion of hepatitis B immunoglobulin in a high-volume liver transplantation center

Backgrounds/Aims

This study intended to evaluate patient safety and efficiency of facility utilization following simplified ultra-rapid intravenous infusion of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) in recipients of hepatitis B virus-associated adult liver transplantation (LT), who visited our outpatient clinic.

Methods

Our simplified ultra-rapid infusion protocol was to directly infuse 50 ml volume of 10,000 IU HBIG for 20-25 minutes on an ambulatory basis. The incidence of adverse side-effects and the efficiency of facility utilization were assessed retrospectively.

Results

A total of 1,513 patients received 12,472 sessions of HBIG infusion according to simplified ultra-rapid infusion method. Of these, 1,172 patients were converted from conventional ultra-rapid infusion method, and received 8,352 sessions of HBIG infusion for 18 months (mean 7.1 times; 4.8 times per year). The remaining 341 de novo patients received 4,120 sessions of HBIG infusion for 18 months (mean 12.1 times; 8.1 times per year). None of these patients experienced any adverse side-effects following the simplified ultra-rapid infusion. The maximal capacity of HBIG infusion sessions at the injection facility of our outpatient clinic was increased from 65-70 sessions to 80 sessions, after introduction of simplified ultra-rapid infusion method. Mean trough anti-HBs titer was lower, and mean interval of HBIG infusion was longer in the combination therapy group compared with HBIG monotherapy group.

Conclusions

Our high-volume study indicates that in nearly all LT recipients, rapid infusion of highly purified HBIG within 30 minutes was well-tolerated. This suggests that it would be reasonable to perform simplified ultra-rapid infusion protocol widely for patient convenience.

[Getting to zero mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B virus: dream and challenge]

To eliminate viral hepatitis as a public health threat, the World Health Organization has set the ambitious goal of reducing the prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) in children to 0.1% by 2030, and the key to this grand goal is cutting off hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission from mother-to-child. Previously, national and international guidelines for the management of chronic hepatitis B recommended the use of hepatitis B vaccine and hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) or combination of any in neonates and antiviral drugs for pregnant women with high viral load in late pregnancy. However, a recent study in Thailand found that the addition of antiviral drugs in pregnant women with high viral load in the third trimester did not significantly lower the incidence of mother-to-child HBV transmission, but no case of chronic HBV infection was seen with strict standards hepatitis B vaccine and HBIG combined immunoprophylaxis and the use of tenofovir disoproxil in pregnant women with high viral load in the third trimester. In addition, the incidence of mother -to- child transmission of HBV in the antiviral group was 0, while the incidence of HBV transmission in the placebo group was 2%. Therefore, it is not possible to deny the efficacy of adding antiviral drugs in treating pregnant women with high viral load in the third trimester with combined immunoprophylaxis. There is an urgent need for more real-world studies in clinical practice to further reveal the principles and existing problems of mother- to- child transmission of HBV.

Current evidence on the management of hepatitis B in pregnancy

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is one of the main public health problems across the globe, since almost one third of the world population presents serological markers of contact with the virus. A profound impact on the epidemiology has been exerted by universal vaccination programmes in many countries, nevertheless the infection is still widespread also in its active form. In the areas of high endemicity (prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen positivity > 7%), mother-to-child transmission represents the main modality of infection spread. That makes the correct management of HBV in pregnancy a matter of utmost importance. Furthermore, the infection in pregnancy needs to be carefully assessed and handled not only with respect to the risk of vertical transmission but also with respect to gravid women health. Each therapeutic or preventive choice deserves to be weighed upon attentively. On many aspects evidence is scarce or controversial. This review will highlight the latest insights into the paramount steps in managing HBV in pregnancy, with particular attention to recommendations from recent guidelines and data from up-do-date research syntheses.

Reactivation of hepatitis B after liver transplantation: Current knowledge, molecular mechanisms and implications in management

Chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is a major global health problem affecting an estimated 350 million people with more than 786000 individuals dying annually due to complications, such as cirrhosis, liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Liver transplantation (LT) is considered gold standard for treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver failure and HCC. However, post-transplant viral reactivation can be detrimental to allograft function, leading to poor survival. Prophylaxis with high-dose hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and anti-viral drugs have achieved remarkable progress in LT by suppressing viral replication and improving long-term survival. The combination of lamivudine (LAM) plus HBIG has been for many years the most widely used. However, life-long HBIG use is both cumbersome and costly, whereas long-term use of LAM results in resistant virus. Recently, in an effort to develop HBIG-free protocols, high potency nucleos(t)ide analogues, such as Entecavir or Tenofovir, have been tried either as monotherapy or in combination with low-dose HBIG with excellent results. Current focus is on novel antiviral targets, especially for covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA), in an effort to eradicate HBV infection instead of viral suppression. However, there are several other molecular mechanisms through which HBV may reactivate and need equal attention. The purpose of this review is to address post-LT HBV reactivation, its risk factors, underlying molecular mechanisms, and recent advancements and future of anti-viral therapy.

Hepatitis B vaccine alone may be enough for preventing hepatitis B virus transmission in neonates of HBsAg (+)/HBeAg (-) mothers

BACKGROUND AND AIM

To prospectively evaluate the efficacy of vaccine alone compared with vaccine plus HBIG for preventing HBV transmission in neonates of HBsAg (+)/HBeAg (-) mothers.

METHODS

Combined immunization is currently recommended for neonates of HBsAg (+) mothers in China. As a result, a randomized design is infeasible due to ethical reasons. In practice, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and Jiangsu Province implement vaccine alone and vaccine plus HBIG strategies for neonates born to HBsAg (+)/HBeAg (-) mothers, respectively. We alternatively enrolled neonates of HBsAg (+)/HBeAg (-) mothers from these two regions. Three doses of a recombinant yeast-derived hepatitis B vaccine were given at 0, 1 and 6months with or without HBIG at birth.

RESULTS

At 7months, sera were collected from 132 neonates in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region and 752 neonates in Jiangsu Province. Baseline characteristics of both mothers and neonates were comparable in the two regions. No differences were revealed regarding the occurrence of perinatal HBV transmission with or without HBIG at birth [0.1% (1/752) vs. 0.0% (0/132), p=1.000]. The anti-HBs response rates were 97.7% (129/132) and 98.5% (740/751) for the neonates with vaccine alone and with HBIG (p=0.758), respectively. Vaccine alone induced a significantly higher anti-HBs GMC as compared to vaccine plus HBIG at 7months of age (1555.3mIU/mL vs. 654.9mIU/mL, p<0.0001). At 12months of age, protective levels of anti-HBs remained in 97.4% (596/612) and 98.3% (118/120) of the neonates receiving and not receiving HBIG, respectively (p=0.771). The neonates receiving combined prophylaxis had a markedly lower anti-HBs GMC (210.7mIU/mL vs. 297.0mIU/mL, p=0.011). Horizontal HBV transmission occurred in none of the successfully immunized neonates for both compared groups at 12months of age.

CONCLUSIONS

Vaccine alone may be enough for preventing HBV transmission in neonates of HBsAg (+)/HBeAg (-) mothers.

Sequential telbivudine/lamivudine and hepatitis B immunoglobulin therapy for preventing mother-to-infant transmission of hepatitis B virus

AIM: To assess the value of sequential telbivudine/lamivudine and hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) therapy in preventing mother-to-infant transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV).

METHODS: One hundred and seventy-eight enrolled pregnant women were divided into a telbivudine group, a lamivudine group, an HBIG group and a non-preventive group, and they were given the respective drug for preventing mother-to-infant transmission of HBV. At gestational week 12, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, HBsAg, HBeAg, HBV DNA, HBV genotyping, drug resistance related mutations and natural killer cells were detected. Newborns were routinely injected with hepatitis B vaccine, and the HBIG group was additionally given HBIG 200 IU at birth, 3 and 12 wk after birth. Serum levels of HBsAg and HBeAg were detected at birth and 24 wk after birth. The safety of telbivudine and lamivudine was evaluated.

RESULTS: At 12 wk after receiving antiviral drugs, HBV DNA level was significantly reduced in the telbivudine and lamivudine groups compared with the non-preventive group (P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed in gestational age, mean weight or Apgar score of newborns in each group. In addition, no significant difference was observed in alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, HBsAg, HBeAg, HBV DNA, HBV genotype, drug resistance related mutations or natural killer cells in each group.

CONCLUSION: HBV DNA level can be significantly inhibited by sequential telbivudine/lamivudine and hepatitis B immunoglobulin therapy in pregnant women with high viral load, which can prevent mother-to-infant transmission of HBV.

Post Exposure Prophylaxis for Occupational Exposures to HIV and Hepatitis B: Our Experience of Thirteen Years at a Rural Based Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital of Western India

INTRODUCTION

Health Care Workers (HCWs) are at risk of occupational transmission of HIV, Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C, which can be minimized by following guidelines for standard precautions as well as taking Post Exposure Prophylaxis (PEP) measures. There are limited studies from India documenting details of PEP for HIV and Hepatitis B.

AIM

We aimed to study the efficacy, tolerance, details of PEP regimens used among HCWs exposed to HIV and Hepatitis B as well as vaccination status and (Anti-Hepatitis B Surface Antigen) anti-HBS Antibody Titre Level Among HCWs exposed Hepatitis B.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective observational study was done at a rural based tertiary care teaching centre of Western India.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Hospital Infection Control Committee of our institute was maintaining a record of all reported incidences of HIV and Hepatitis B positive exposures since 2003. We analysed reported incidences of exposures to HIV and Hepatitis B positive source occurred during the period of January 2003 to December 2015.

RESULTS

Of the total 96 exposures, 48 were to HIV and 48 were to Hepatitis B. Of the 48 exposures to HIV, PEP was warranted in 39. Of 39 exposures, only 14 (35.9%) received PEP within two hours. Basic regimen was used in 22 and expanded in 17 exposures. Only 12 (31.6%) reported side effects to PEP. Zidovudine based regimen was less well tolerated. All side effects were reported by female HCWs only. Of the 48 exposed to Hepatitis B, 33 (68.6%) were completely vaccinated. Out of 33, titre result was not available for eight. Three (12.0%) of remaining 25 were having low titre (<10mIU/ml) of anti-HBS antibody. Five of six with incomplete vaccination status demonstrated anti HBS antibody titre > 100mIU/ml. Of the 48, in 17 (35.4%) incidences no action was required; 23 (47.9%) were managed with booster dose of Hepatitis B vaccine and eight (16.7%) with Hepatitis B immunoglobulin. No cases of sero-conversion was reported either for HIV or Hepatitis B from available data.

CONCLUSION

Inspite of high incidences of exposures to HIV or Hepatitis B positive source, good efficacy of PEP was observed with no sero-conversion. PEP for HIV was well tolerated; female HCWs were less tolerant. Study emphasized the need for creating awareness about timely reporting of incidence, achieving maximum vaccination against Hepatitis B for all HCWs and need for anti-HBS antibody titre.

Hepatitis B surface antigen escape mutations: Indications for initiation of antiviral therapy revisited

Approximately 240 million people are chronically infected with hepatitis B. The implementation of rigorous vaccination programs has led to an overall decrease in the prevalence of this disease worldwide but this may also have led to emergence of viral mutations that can escape the protection of hepatitis B surface antibody. As this phenomenon is increasingly recognized, concern for transmission to vaccinated individuals has also been raised. Herein, we describe two cases where the suspected presence of a hepatitis B surface antigen escape mutation impacted the decision to initiate early antiviral therapy, as well as provide a brief review of these mutations. Our findings described here suggest that a lower threshold for initiating therapy in these individuals should be considered in order to reduce the risk of transmission, as vaccination does not provide protection.

Low incidence of acute rejection in hepatitis B virus positive liver transplant recipients and the impact of hepatitis B immunoglobulin

Historically, hepatitis B virus (HBV) liver transplantation (LT) recipients have less acute cellular rejection (ACR) than those without HBV. We questioned whether this has persisted in an era of decreased Hepatitis B immunoglobulin use (HBIG) given its in vitro immunoregulatory effects. We compared the incidence, risk factors and outcomes of ACR among 40,593 primary LT recipients with HBV, hepatitis C, steatohepatitis, and immune liver disease (OPTN 2000-2011). We also assessed the in vitro effect of HBIG on alloimmune lymphoproliferation and regulatory T cell generation using mixed lymphocyte reactions. In multivariate analysis, HBV status remained a strong independent predictor of freedom from ACR (OR 0.58, 95% CI: 1.5-2.1). Patient (67.7% vs 72.3%) and graft (60.8% vs 69.1%) survival were significantly lower in patients with ACR versus no ACR for all causes except HBV. HBIG use had no statistical association with ACR. In vitro, HBIG at concentrations equivalent to clinical dosing did not inhibit lymphoproliferation or promote regulatory T cell development. In summary, the incidence and impact of ACR is lower now for HBV LT and does not appear to be secondary to HBIG by our in vitro and in vivo analyses. Rather, it may be due to the innate immunosuppressive properties of chronic HBV infection.

Management of hepatitis B virus infection after liver transplantation

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is responsible for up to 30% of cases of liver cirrhosis and up to 53% of cases of hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver transplantation (LT) is the best therapeutic option for patients with end-stage liver failure caused by HBV. The success of transplantation, though, depends on receiving prophylactic treatment against post-transplant viral reactivation. In the absence of prophylaxis, liver transplantation due to chronic hepatitis B (CHB) is associated with high rates of viral recurrence and poor survival. The introduction of treatment with hepatitis B immunoglobulins (HBIG) during the 1990s and later the incorporation of oral antiviral drugs have improved the prognosis of these patients. Thus, LT for CHB is now a universally accepted option, with an estimated 5 years survival of around 85% vs the 45% survival seen prior to the introduction of HBIG. The combination of lamivudine plus HBIG has for many years been the most widely used prophylactic regimen. However, with the appearance of new more potent oral antiviral agents associated with less resistance (e.g., entecavir and tenofovir) for the treatment of CHB, new prophylactic strategies are being designed, either in combination with HBIG or alone as a monotherapy. These advances have allowed for more personalized prophylaxis based on the individual risk profile of a given patient. In addition, the small pool of donors has required the use of anti-HBc-positive donors (with the resulting possibility of transmitting HBV from these organs), which has been made possible by suitable prophylactic regimens.

Application of nucleoside analogues to liver transplant recipients with hepatitis B

Hepatitis B is a common yet serious infectious disease of the liver, affecting millions of people worldwide. Liver transplantation is the only possible treatment for those who advance to end-stage liver disease. Donors positive for hepatitis B virus (HBV) core antibody (HBcAb) have previously been considered unsuitable for transplants. However, those who test negative for the more serious hepatitis B surface antigen can now be used as liver donors, thereby reducing organ shortages. Remarkable improvements have been made in the treatment against HBV, most notably with the development of nucleoside analogues (NAs), which markedly lessen cirrhosis and reduce post-transplantation HBV recurrence. However, HBV recurrence still occurs in many patients following liver transplantation due to the development of drug resistance and poor compliance with therapy. Optimized prophylactic treatment with appropriate NA usage is crucial prior to liver transplantation, and undetectable HBV DNA at the time of transplantation should be achieved. NA-based and hepatitis B immune globulin-based treatment regimens can differ between patients depending on the patients’ condition, virus status, and presence of drug resistance. This review focuses on the current progress in applying NAs during the perioperative period of liver transplantation and the prophylactic strategies using NAs to prevent de novo HBV infection in recipients of HBcAb-positive liver grafts.

Change of strategies and future perspectives against hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation

A few decades ago, liver transplantation in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection was considered a relative contraindication because of the high rate of graft infections and poor prognosis. Since then, remarkable progress was introduced by using nucleos(t)ide analogues and/or hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) and liver transplantation for HBV-related disease is now becoming one of the good indication. However, high cost burden is the main problem for this combination prophylaxis for a long time use, and this issue should be emerged to be resolved. In this review, we show the progress of post anti-HBV strategies showing the history from introduction of HBIg and nucleos(t)ide analogues to recent new strategies with hepatitis B vaccine or saving or stopping protocols of HBIg, and clarify and discuss how to do for further improvement of prevention strategies with better quality.

Recent advances in prevention of hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation

Liver transplantation is the only effective treatment for hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related end-stage liver disease. However, without antiviral prophylaxis, the recurrence rate of hepatitis B is as high as 80%-100%, which leads to a 50% mortality rate in the first 2 years after liver transplantation. Combination therapy of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and lamivudine demonstrated a higher efficacy of prophylaxis and further reduced the rate of recurrence to < 10%. The strategy of HBIG combined with lamivudine has been the standard treatment in many centers. However, the high rate of lamivudine resistance and the many disadvantages of HBIG have compelled surgeons to reconsider the long-term efficacy of this strategy for the prevention of HBV reinfection. Recently, new nucleos(t)ide analogues, such as entecavir and tenofovir, have been approved as first-line monotherapies for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection. These antiviral medicines have replaced lamivudine as the first choice in the prevention of HBV recurrence after liver transplantation. Various therapies that are composed of entecavir, tenofovir, and lamivudine plus adefovir, with or without HBIG have been adopted in several liver transplant centers. This article reviews the recent advances in prophylaxis for the recurrence of hepatitis B after liver transplantation.

Prophylaxis against hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation: A registry study

AIM: To evaluate the prophylactic efficacy of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) in combination with different nucleos(t)ide analogues.

METHODS: A total of 5333 hepatitis B surface antigen-positive patients from the China Liver Transplant Registry database were enrolled between January 2000 and December 2009. Low-dose intramuscular (im) HBIG combined with one nucleos(t)ide analogue has been shown to be very cost-effective in recent reports. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) prophylactic outcomes were compared based on their posttransplant prophylactic protocols [group A (n = 4684): im HBIG plus lamivudine; group B (n = 491): im HBIG plus entecavir; group C (n = 158): im HBIG plus adefovir dipivoxil]. We compared the related baseline characteristics among the three groups, including the age, male sex, Meld score at the time of transplantation, Child-Pugh score at the time of transplantation, HCC, pre-transplantation hepatitis B e antigen positivity, pre-transplantation HBV deoxyribonucleic acid (HBV DNA) positivity, HBV DNA at the time of transplantation, pre-transplantation antiviral therapy, and the duration of antiviral therapy before transplantation of the patients. We also calculated the 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates and HBV recurrence rates according to the different groups. All potential risk factors were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS: The mean follow-up duration was 42.1 ± 30.3 mo. The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rates were lower in group A than in groups B (86.2% vs 94.4%, 76.9% vs 86.6%, 73.7% vs 82.4%, respectively, P < 0.001) and C (86.2% vs 92.5%, 76.9% vs 73.7%, 87.0% vs 81.6%, respectively, P < 0.001). The 1-, 3- and 5-year posttransplant HBV recurrence rates were significantly higher in group A than in group B (1.7% vs 0.5%, 3.5% vs 1.5%, 4.7% vs 1.5%, respectively, P = 0.023). No significant difference existed between groups A and C and between groups B and C with respect to the 1-, 3- and 5-year HBV recurrence rates. Pretransplant hepatocellular carcinoma, high viral load and posttransplant prophylactic protocol (lamivudine and HBIG vs entecavir and HBIG) were associated with HBV recurrence.

CONCLUSION: Low-dose intramuscular HBIG in combination with a nucleos(t)ide analogue provides effective prophylaxis against posttransplant HBV recurrence, especially for HBIG plus entecavir.

Treatment of patients with HBV-related decompensated cirrhosis and liver transplanted patients

Antiviral therapy using newer nucleos(t)ide analogs with lower resistance rates could suppress hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication, improve liver function in patients with compensated or decompensated cirrhosis, delay or obviate liver transplantation in some patients, and reduce the risk of HBV recurrence. Some form of HBV prophylaxis needs to be continued indefinitely posttransplant. However, in patients with a low-risk of HBV recurrence it is possible to discontinue hepatitis B immunoglobulins and maintain long-term nucleos(t)ide analog therapy. Currently, treatment of posttransplantation hepatitis B is a less important clinical problem than it was historically because effective antiviral therapies exist to rescue patients who failed initial prophylaxis.

Simple nucleos(t)ides as HBV prophylaxis regime of post-liver transplantation: Six-year followed up

A combination of nucleos(t)ides and hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) has been found to be effective for the prevention of hepatitis B viral (HBV) reinfection after liver transplantation (LT), but its administration is costly, and not always available. We report the case of a male, 33-year-old cirrhotic patient who has tested positive for serum HBsAg, and HBeAg, with 9.04 × 10(7) copies/mL of HBV DNA. He suffered from acute liver failure and was near death before undergoing emergency LT. No HBIg was available at the time, so only lamivudine was used. He routinely received immunosuppression medication. Serum HBV DNA and HBsAg still showed positive post-LT, and the graft re-infected. Hepatitis B flared three months later. Adefovir dipivoxil was added to the treatment, but in the 24(th) mo of treatment, the patient developed lamivudine resistance and a worsening of the hepatitis occurred shortly thereafter. The treatment combination was then changed to a double dosage of entecavir and the disease was gradually resolved. After 60-mo of post-LT nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy, anti-HBs seroconverted, and the antiviral was stopped. By the end of a 12-mo follow-up, the patient had achieved sustained recovery. In conclusion, the case seems to point to evidence that more potent and less resistant analogues like entecavir might fully replace HBIg as an HBV prophylaxis and treatment regimen.

Current prophylactic strategies against hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation

Prophylactic strategies against hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) are essential for patients with HBV-related disease. Before LT, lamivudine (LAM) was proposed to be down-graded from first- to second-line therapy. In contrast, adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) has been approved not only as first-line therapy but also as rescue therapy for patients with LAM resistance. Furthermore, combination of ADV and LAM may result in lower risk of ADV resistance than ADV monotherapy. Other new drugs such as entecavir, telbivudine and tenofovir, are probably candidates for the treatment of hepatitis-B-surface-antigen-positive patients awaiting LT. After LT, low-dose intramuscular hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG), in combination with LAM, has been regarded as the most cost-effective regimen for the prevention of post-transplant HBV recurrence in recipients without pretransplant LAM resistance and rapidly accepted in many transplant centers. With the introduction of new antiviral drugs, new hepatitis B vaccine and its new adjuvants, post-transplant HBIG-free therapeutic regimens with new oral antiviral drug combinations or active HBV vaccination combined with adjuvants will be promising, particularly in those patients with low risk of HBV recurrence.

A prophylactic approach for bone marrow transplantation from a hepatitis B surface antigen-positive donor

It has been accepted that bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is the only curative therapeutic option for certain hematologic malignancies. The southeast Asia region is an endemic area of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection; thus, BMT using a hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive donor is occasionally unavoidable. Organ transplantation using a HBsAg-positive donor can lead to post-transplantation de novo HBV infection and severe HBV-related hepatitis if no effective prophylactic measures are taken prior to and after transplantation. In this report, a four-level approach was designed for a patient with chronic myeloid leukemia, beginning with a booster HBV vaccination before performing BMT with a HBsAg-positive donor. Prior to BMT, the HBV viral load of the donor was reduced to an undetectable level by antiviral therapy. After BMT, hepatitis B immunoglobulin was administered intramuscularly for 1 wk together with a long-term antiviral drug, lamivudine. One year after discontinuation of lamivudine, the patient is still free of HBV infection.

Potential effect of specific immunotherapy on chronic hepatitis B of vertical maternal-fetal transmission: an analysis of 23 cases

AIM: To study the efficacy of specific immuno-therapy in the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) of vertical maternal-fetal transmission.

METHODS: HBsAg vaccine-loaded dendritic cells (DC, 10⁶) and HBIg (200 U) were injected respectively into 23 patients with CHB of vertical transmission. Six months were considered as one course, and there were two courses in total. At the end of treatment, liver function, HBV DNA level and HBV markers in the patients were measured.

RESULTS: Of the 9 patients with HBeAg(+) CHB, 1 case showed a complete response, and 7 showed partial responses. Of the 4 patients with HBeAg(-) CHB, partial responses occurred in 2 cases. No responses were observed in the 5 chronic HBV carriers. Of the 5 inactive HBsAg carriers, 1 case showed a complete response, while the rest showed no responses.

CONCLUSION: The specific immunotherapy is effective in the treatment of CHB transmitted from the mothers.

Low-dose intra-muscular hepatitis B immunoglobulin combined with lamivudine for long-term prophylaxis of hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of long-term, low-dose intra-muscular hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIg) combined with lamivudine (LAM) in patients who received orthotopic liver transpl-ants (OLT) and have been followed up for acute or chronic HBV-related end-stage liver disease.

METHODS: The liver transplantation recipients (n = 173) who have been followed up and received antiviral prophylaxis post-OLT were divided into 3 sub-groups according to their post-OLT antiviral therapy, which were group A (LAM monotherapy, n = 2), group B (HBIg and LAM therapy, n = 168) and group C (HBIg and ADF therapy n = 3). All the patients received LAM treatment for 1 or 2 wk ahead of OLT. Either LAM (100 mg) or ADF (adefovir dipivoxil, 10 mg) was administered orally every day. HBIg were administered intravenously during the first post-operative week (total 5000 or 10 000 U according to HBV copies/L pre-operative) and intramuscularly thereafter (400 U per time, the interval can be adjusted according to HBsAb titer in the blood) to maintain an HBsAb titer > 300 U/L within 1 mo, > 200 U/L between 2-3 mo and > 100 U/L beyond 3 mo after operation. Mean follow-up period was 20.8 ± 14 mo. The periodical investigation for the liver function, the serological HBV and the analyses of liver tissues by immunohistochemistry were performed. The recurrent HB and the death suffered from it were recorded and analyzed in this research. The recurrence rates of HBV infection between UCLA and our institute were statistically analyzed.

RESULTS: Four patients experienced HBV recurrence overall. One patient in group A experienced HBV recurrence (1 week after OLT) and positive HBV DNA (2 mo after OLT) associated with an increase in serum alanine aminotransferase. The treatment resistance of LAM was defined and the recipient died of the multiple organ failure 8 mo after OLT. Recurrent HBV appeared in 3 patients, whose HBV DNA levels in the pre-OLT blood were more than 10⁸ copies/L, in group B (12 d, 12 mo and 1.5 mo after OLT respectively). The pre- and post-operative HBeAg and HBV DNA were always positive in the first case whose blood HBsAb titer was far lower than programming effective one. The treatment resistance of HBIg was defined and the patient died of fulminant hepatitis 11 mo after OLT. The second case became an HBsAg carrier after HBV recurrence and was dead due to tumor recurrence 15 mo after OLT. The third case was fine with the treatment of HBIg combined with ADF and was negative for HBsAg after 5.5 mo. The HBV mutation might exist in both of the second and third case. None of group C had HBV recurrence. The HBV recurrence rate under the prophylaxis of HBIg combined with LAM was 1.8% (3/168). Intra-muscular HBIg was tolerated well in all the cases. The study showed no difference between UCLA and our institute (χ² = 0.280 37), and the expenditure was 3000-4000 US dollars per year.

CONCLUSION: The low-dose intra-muscular HBIg combined with LAM is efficacious in the long-term prophylaxis of hepatitis B recurrence after OLT. The total expenditure of prophylaxis is lower. ADF shows efficacy against the HBV-YMDD lamivudine-resistant mutation and may be a more efficacious agent for the prophylaxis of HBV recurrence after OLT.