Editorial: Mitigating the risk of severe hepatitis flare following nucleoside analogue discontinuation-Insights from a real-world study

This article is linked to Hsu et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17614 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.17644

Severe Acute Exacerbation After Cessation of Nucleos(t)ide Analog for Chronic Hepatitis B: A Real-World Study of Routine Practice

There is an ongoing debate as to whether patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) may discontinue nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) therapy before seroclearance of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg).1 Whereas treatment discontinuation may facilitate HBsAg seroclearance and avoid indefinite drug exposure,2 reactivation of viral replication almost always follows treatment cessation and frequently leads to clinical flares.3 In patients who encounter withdrawal flares, severe acute exacerbation (SAE) could occur with fatal consequences.4 Quantitative knowledge about the risk of SAE is imperative to inform the debate and also the practice.

Ongoing viral replication and production of infectious virus in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus suppressed below the limit of quantitation on long-term nucleos(t)ide therapy

Nucleos(t)ide analogs are standard-of-care for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B and can effectively reduce hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication but rarely leads to cure. Nucleos(t)ide analogs do not directly eliminate the viral episome, therefore treatment cessation typically leads to rapid viral rebound. While treatment is effective, HBV DNA is still detectable (although not quantifiable) in the periphery of the majority of nucleos(t)ide analog treated HBV patients, even after prolonged treatment. Addressing whether the detectable HBV DNA represents infectious virus is a key unknown and has important implications for the development of a curative treatment for HBV. The minimum HBV genome equivalents required to establish infection in human liver chimeric mice was determined by titration of HBV patient sera and the infectivity in chimeric mice of serum from patients (n = 7) suppressed to the limit of detection on nucleos(t)ide analog therapy was evaluated. A minimum of 5 HBV genome equivalents were required to establish infection in the chimeric mice, confirming this model has sufficient sensitivity to determine whether serum from virally suppressed patients contains infectious virus. Strikingly, serum from 75% (n = 3 out of 4) of nucleos(t)ide-treated HBV patients with DNA that was detectable, but below the lower limit of quantitation, also established infection in the chimeric mice. These results demonstrate that infectious virus is still present in some HBV patients on suppressive nucleos(t)ide therapy. This residual virus may support viral persistence via continuous infection and explain the ongoing risk for HBV-related complications despite long-term suppression on therapy. Thus, additional treatment intensification may facilitate HBV cure.

Human genetic risk of treatment with antiviral nucleoside analog drugs that induce lethal mutagenesis: The special case of molnupiravir

This review considers antiviral nucleoside analog drugs, including ribavirin, favipiravir, and molnupiravir, which induce genome error catastrophe in SARS-CoV or SARS-CoV-2 via lethal mutagenesis as a mode of action. In vitro data indicate that molnupiravir may be 100 times more potent as an antiviral agent than ribavirin or favipiravir. Molnupiravir has recently demonstrated efficacy in a phase 3 clinical trial. Because of its anticipated global use, its relative potency, and the reported in vitro "host" cell mutagenicity of its active principle, β-d-N4-hydroxycytidine, we have reviewed the development of molnupiravir and its genotoxicity safety evaluation, as well as the genotoxicity profiles of three congeners, that is, ribavirin, favipiravir, and 5-(2-chloroethyl)-2'-deoxyuridine. We consider the potential genetic risks of molnupiravir on the basis of all available information and focus on the need for additional human genotoxicity data and follow-up in patients treated with molnupiravir and similar drugs. Such human data are especially relevant for antiviral NAs that have the potential of permanently modifying the genomes of treated patients and/or causing human teratogenicity or embryotoxicity. We conclude that the results of preclinical genotoxicity studies and phase 1 human clinical safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics are critical components of drug safety assessments and sentinels of unanticipated adverse health effects. We provide our rationale for performing more thorough genotoxicity testing prior to and within phase 1 clinical trials, including human PIG-A and error corrected next generation sequencing (duplex sequencing) studies in DNA and mitochondrial DNA of patients treated with antiviral NAs that induce genome error catastrophe via lethal mutagenesis.

[Chronic hepatitis B and D (delta) : Current and future treatments]

BACKGROUND

Worldwide, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is among the 30 leading causes of death, despite effective vaccination and therapeutic options. Chronic hepatitis delta (coinfection with hepatitis D virus) leads to a rapid disease progression.

AIMS

Based on current international guidelines and studies, an overview about present and future therapeutic options for chronic hepatitis B and delta is provided.

RESULTS

Therapy with nucleoside or nucleotide analogues leads to nearly complete HBV DNA suppression, which is associated with regression of liver fibrosis and a lower risk for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Therapy of chronic hepatitis delta with pegylated interferon alfa achieves only low response rates with high risk for virological relapse. Various therapeutic approaches are currently being investigated in preclinical and clinical studies and have led to a significant reduction of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and HDV RNA.

CONCLUSION

Current therapies of chronic HBV infection can effectively reduce subsequent complications. New therapeutic approaches promise functional cure (HBsAg loss) of HBV infection and effective treatment options for patients with chronic hepatitis delta.

High percentage atypical hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B patients treated with nucleos(t)ide analogs

Nucleos(t)ide analogs are used for preventing liver cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis B patients, but the risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in these patients remain unclear. We designed this retrospective cohort study, the aim is to determine the risk factors for HCC development and its image presentation under nucleos(t)ide analogs treatment.In this study, patients were treated with lamivudine (LAM), entecavir 0.5 mg (ETV), or telbivudine (LdT), and followed-up for at least 2 years to detect HCC and its presentation. Assessment of the risk factors for HCC included age, sex, HBeAg, viral load, liver cirrhosis, current and previous medications, and liver function tests.Totally, 396 patients were recruited, and 18 patients developed HCC. The mean time from the treatment to HCC development was 28.5 ± 16.7 months. The clinical characteristics in HCC and no-HCC groups showed significant differences among age (52.8 ± 6.1 vs 47.1 ± 12.6 years, P <.01), baseline alanine transaminase (ALT) levels (161.4 ± 177.3 vs 361.7 ± 496.3, P <.01), and baseline liver cirrhosis (72.2% vs 29.9%, P <.01). In patients aged ≥45 years, the hazard ratio of HCC was 10.2 and liver cirrhosis was 4.1. Majority of HCCs developed in the right liver (14/18), were single numbered (13/18), had tumor size about 1.9 ± 0.7 cm, were classified as T1 (14/18, TNM staging), and the atypical image occupied 88% of the HCC cases.The patients aged ≧45 years on long-term nucleos(t)ide analog therapy, and with baseline liver cirrhosis were at a high risk of HCC. Regular alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) assessment and image study of these patients are the gold standards for early HCC detection in patients with high percentage atypical HCC appearances.

Multicenter study of skin rashes and hepatotoxicity in antiretroviral-naïve HIV-positive patients receiving non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor plus nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors in Taiwan

OBJECTIVES

Two nucleos(t)ide reverse-transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) plus 1 non-NRTI (nNRTI) remain the preferred or alternative combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) for antiretroviral-naive HIV-positive patients in Taiwan. The three most commonly used nNRTIs are nevirapine (NVP), efavirenz (EFV) and rilpivirine (RPV). This study aimed to determine the incidences of hepatotoxicity and skin rashes within 4 weeks of initiation of cART containing 1 nNRTI plus 2 NRTIs.

METHODS

Between June, 2012 and November, 2015, all antiretroviral-naive HIV-positive adult patients initiating nNRTI-containing cART at 8 designated hospitals for HIV care were included in this retrospective observational study. According to the national HIV treatment guidelines, patients were assessed at baseline, 2 and 4 weeks of cART initiation, and subsequently every 8 to 12 weeks. Plasma HIV RNA load, CD4 cell count and aminotransferases were determined. The toxicity grading scale of the Division of AIDS (DAIDS) 2014 was used for reporting clinical and laboratory adverse events.

RESULTS

During the 3.5-year study period, 2,341 patients initiated nNRTI-containing cART: NVP in 629 patients, EFV 1,363 patients, and RPV 349 patients. Rash of any grade occurred in 14.1% (n = 331) of the patients. In multiple logistic regression analysis, baseline CD4 cell counts (per 100-cell/μl increase, adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.125; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.031-1.228) and use of NVP (AOR, 2.443; 95% CI, 1.816-3.286) (compared with efavirenz) were independently associated with the development of skin rashes. Among the 1,455 patients (62.2%) with aminotransferase data both at baseline and week 4, 72 (4.9%) developed grade 2 or greater hepatotoxicity. In multiple logistic regression analysis, presence of antibody for hepatitis C virus (HCV) (AOR, 2.865; 95% CI, 1.439-5.704) or hepatitis B surface antigen (AOR, 2.397; 95% CI, 1.150-4.997), and development of skin rashes (AOR, 2.811; 95% CI, 1.051-7.521) were independently associated with the development of hepatotoxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

The baseline CD4 cell counts and use of NVP were associated with increased risk of skin rashes, while hepatotoxicity was independently associated with HCV or hepatitis B virus coinfection, and development of skin rashes in antiretroviral-naïve HIV-positive Taiwanese patients within 4 weeks of initiation of nNRTI-containing regimens.

Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor Usage and the Incidence of Peripheral Neuropathy in HIV/AIDS Patients

Peripheral neuropathy (PN) is a well-known adverse effect of treatment with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). We performed a prospective follow-up study in HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy containing NRTIs. The objective of this study was to examine the incidence of PN among patients using NRTI drugs. Data were obtained using medical records of patients continuously monitored for the efficacy and toxicity of antiretroviral therapy. The incident cases of PN were examined. Incidence rates of PN were calculated for each antiretroviral regimen that included zidovudine, zalcitabine, lamivudine, didanosine (ddI), stavudine (d4T) or didanosine+ stavudine. Poisson regression was used to compare the relative risk of PN for each regimen. A total of 112 HIV-infected patients were treated with at least one NRTI-containing regimen. Thirty-two cases of PN were recorded. The lowest incidence rate (IR) of 0.13 per 100 person-years occurred in patients treated with didanosine. The highest IR for PN occurred with the didanosine+stavudine combination (IR=0.18 per 100 person-years). Compared to didanosine alone, the relative risk of PN was 1.77 (95%CI, 0.52–2.12) for stavudine, and 1.76 (95%CI, 0.95–2.49) for didanosine+stavudine. Other risk factors for PN included a low CD4 cell count and female sex. Our data show that the risk of PN is almost twice as high when stavudine is used alone or in combination with didanosine. The use of stavudine alone or in combination with didanosine should probably not be routinely recommended if other treatment options are available.

Does Nucleos(t)ide Analogues Treatment Affect Renal Function in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Who Have Already Decreased eGFR? A Longitudinal Study

This study aimed to assess the renal function in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who received nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) therapy using estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) titer. We performed a longitudinal observational study of 37 tenofovir-, 42 telbivudine-, and 62 entecavir-naïve CHB patients, who had impaired renal function (eGFR, 90-30 ml/min/1.73m2) without history of diabetes, hypertension, and chemotherapy. Calculation and evaluation of eGFR was performed with the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration, and Cockcroft-Gault formula at pretreatment, at baseline, and after the 1st and 2nd year of treatment. The eGFR was significantly increased in patients given telbivudine or entecavir (p = 0.003 and p = 0.012, respectively), but the eGFR was decreased in patients given tenofovir (p = 0.001) after 2 years of treatment. Of all patients, eGFR was stable one year prior to treatment. If we analyzed the renal function by change of chronic kidney disease (CKD) category with a change of 25% of eGFR, the proportion of uncertain drop (drop in CKD category with <25% decrease in eGFR) and certain drop (drop in CKD category with ≧25% decrease in eGFR) in tenofovir group was smaller (5.4%) than those of telbivudine (12.9%) or entecavir (6.5%). Furthermore, telbivudine had the lowest stable rate (76.2%), the highest certain rise rate (9.5%), and certain drop rate (7.1%) compared to the other groups (p = 0.049). In conclusion, in NAs-naïve CHB patients with impaired renal function, telbivudine and entecavir resulted in a significant increase in eGFR while tenofovir resulted in a significant decrease after a 2-year treatment. Interestingly, TDF had the lowest proportion of patients reclassified to certain and uncertain drop groups; in contrast, LdT had a higher proportion in both raise and drop groups. The outcomes of this renal effect remain to be determined.

Application of nucleoside analogues to liver transplant recipients with hepatitis B

Hepatitis B is a common yet serious infectious disease of the liver, affecting millions of people worldwide. Liver transplantation is the only possible treatment for those who advance to end-stage liver disease. Donors positive for hepatitis B virus (HBV) core antibody (HBcAb) have previously been considered unsuitable for transplants. However, those who test negative for the more serious hepatitis B surface antigen can now be used as liver donors, thereby reducing organ shortages. Remarkable improvements have been made in the treatment against HBV, most notably with the development of nucleoside analogues (NAs), which markedly lessen cirrhosis and reduce post-transplantation HBV recurrence. However, HBV recurrence still occurs in many patients following liver transplantation due to the development of drug resistance and poor compliance with therapy. Optimized prophylactic treatment with appropriate NA usage is crucial prior to liver transplantation, and undetectable HBV DNA at the time of transplantation should be achieved. NA-based and hepatitis B immune globulin-based treatment regimens can differ between patients depending on the patients’ condition, virus status, and presence of drug resistance. This review focuses on the current progress in applying NAs during the perioperative period of liver transplantation and the prophylactic strategies using NAs to prevent de novo HBV infection in recipients of HBcAb-positive liver grafts.

Impact of nucleos(t)ide analogue combination therapy on the estimated glomerular filtration rate in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Monotherapy with telbivudine or adefovir can affect estimated the glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). However, only a few studies have assessed changes in eGFR in patients who have chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and are receiving nucleos(t)ide analogue (NA) combination therapy. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of long-term NA combination therapy on eGFR in Chinese CHB patients. This retrospective study included 195 CHB patients. Patient subgroups included those treated with lamivudine plus adefovir (n = 73), telbivudine plus adefovir (n = 51), and entecavir plus adefovir (n = 35); untreated patients (n = 36) served as a control group. After an average follow-up duration of 24 months with combination therapy, analysis of changes in eGFR from baseline values, calculated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formulas, showed decrease by 11.08 and 18.34 mL/min (P < .001), respectively, in the lamivudine plus adefovir group; decrease by 3.73 and 10.04 mL/min (P = .012), respectively, in the entecavir plus adefovir group; and increase by 0.91 and 2.12 mL/min (P = .46), respectively, in the telbivudine plus adefovir group. The eGFR in the telbivudine plus adefovir group was similar to that for the untreated group. The eGFR decreases due to adefovir therapy could be rescued by adding telbivudine, and the eGFR increase due to telbivudine could be compromised by adding adefovir. Adefovir in combination with lamivudine or entecavir therapy was significantly associated with decreased eGFR, but telbivudine could rescue the eGFR decrease that results from adefovir treatment.

Effects of switching to protease inhibitor monotherapy on nucleoside analogue-related adverse events

Switching from triple combination treatment to protease inhibitor monotherapy may increase the risk of elevations in HIV RNA, and is not recommended in most international treatment guidelines. However, the use of protease inhibitor monotherapy could prevent or reverse adverse events related to long-term use of nucleoside analogues, such as lipoatrophy, renal adverse events, osteopenia, and anemia. A detailed MEDLINE search was conducted to identify randomized clinical trials of triple-combination treatment versus protease inhibitor monotherapy with detailed analyses of safety. Summary results from analysis of changes in body composition, changes in lipids, renal adverse events, and anemia were evaluated for patients taking either protease inhibitor monotherapy or triple therapy. In six trials with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry data available, the percentage of patients with lipoatrophy was significantly lower in the protease inhibitor monotherapy arms than the triple therapy arms (p = 0.03). In these trials there was also no significant difference in the risk of lipohypertrophy between protease inhibitor monotherapy and triple therapy arms. In one trial there was a higher risk of renal adverse events for patients taking tenofovir in the triple therapy arm. In two trials there were rises in total cholesterol when patients stopped taking tenofovir in the protease inhibitor monotherapy arms. In conclusion, there is a mixed pattern of changes in nucleoside analogue-related adverse events after switching from triple therapy to protease inhibitor therapy. The potential for safety benefits of stopping nucleoside analogues needs to be set against a higher risk of HIV RNA elevations during protease inhibitor monotherapy.

Single-Dose and Multiple-Dose Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Telbivudine After Oral Administration in Healthy Chinese Subjects

The pharmacokinetics of telbivudine, an L-nucleoside with potent activity against hepatitis B virus, was assessed in 42 healthy Chinese volunteers. Subjects were assigned to receive a single oral dose of 200, 400, or 800 mg telbivudine or repeat doses of 600 mg/d. Telbivudine was absorbed rapidly and exhibited dose-related plasma exposure. After reaching maximum concentration (C(max)) at a median time of 2.0 to 2.5 hours, plasma disposition of the drug was biphasic with a mean terminal half-life ranging from 39.4 to 49.1 hours. Telbivudine accumulated slightly after repeat doses, and steady state was reached after 5 to 6 consecutive doses of 600 mg/d. The mean steady-state C(max) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval of telbivudine 600 mg were 3.7 microg/mL and 26.1 microg x h/mL, respectively. Cumulative urinary excretion of telbivudine over 32 hours represented 24.4% of the administered dose, with a mean renal clearance of 6.6 L/h. Telbivudine was well tolerated in the studied dose range in healthy Chinese subjects, with no pattern of dose-related clinical or laboratory adverse events.

Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of KP-1461 as monotherapy for 124 days in antiretroviral-experienced, HIV type 1-infected subjects

Treatment of HIV infection with conventional antiretroviral therapy (ART) is a lifelong challenge with significant long-term risks of adverse events and treatment failure-induced HIV resistance being major concerns. One potential alternative to standard treatment is the use of viral decay accelerators, antiviral agents that theoretically can drive the rate of viral mutation beyond the compensatory capacity of the virus, thereby inducing viral extinction. One such drug, KP-1461, was tested in a population of HIV-infected persons not receiving ART to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the strategy in vivo. Of 24 highly treatment-experienced HIV-infected patients who received at least one dose of KP-1461, 13 completed the planned 4 months of monotherapy. The drug was generally well tolerated; it did not significantly affect either HIV viral load or CD4 lymphocyte count over the period of dosing. Pharmacokinetic sampling suggested adequate drug exposure was achieved. There were no new mutations induced by KP-1461 that changed viral susceptibility to standard antiretroviral agents. After the study was completed, analysis of more than 7 million base pairs of HIV samples from study patients and controls demonstrated changes in the pattern of viral mutations that differed significantly from what would be encountered naturally. The identified alterations were consistent with an effect resulting from KP-1461's proposed mechanism of action. These findings suggest that the novel antiretroviral approach illustrated by this study should be further investigated, particularly given the relatively good tolerability and the demonstrated excellent safety in this limited cohort study.

Development of modified nucleosides that have supremely high anti-HIV activity and low toxicity and prevent the emergence of resistant HIV mutants

An idea to use 4'-C-substituted-2'-deoxynucleoside derivatives was proposed based on a working hypothesis to solve the problems of existing acquired immune deficiency syndrome chemotherapy (highly active antiretroviral therapy). Subsequent studies have successfully proved the validity of the idea and resulted in the development of 2'-deoxy-4'-C-ethynyl-2-fluoroadenosine and 2'-deoxy-4'-C-ethynyl-2-chloroadenosine, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, which have supremely high activity against all human immunodeficiency viruses including multidrug-resistant HIV and low toxicity.

Detection of food-derived damaged nucleosides with possible adverse effects on human health using a global adductomics approach

A range of damaged nucleosides, also found in digested dietary DNA, appear to be taken up by cells and incorporated into the cells' own DNA. Most incorporated damaged nucleosides will be repaired by cellular DNA repair systems. However, a small fraction of these will escape repair and thus ultimately create mutations. Over the long human lifespan this could be a mechanism that contributes to disease, cancer, and aging. This study analyzed damaged nucleosides derived from dietary DNA in a commercially successful fungus-based novel food, Quorn, and in two fungus-based food items with a history of safe use, button mushroom ( Agaricus bisporus ) and dried powdered brewers yeast ( Saccharomyces cerevisiae ). By using liquid chromatography combined with tandem mass spectrometry more than 90 putative DNA adducts were measured, showing that foods do contain a range of different DNA damages.

[New treatment of chronic hepatitis B]

Worldwide, 350 million people are infected with chronic hepatitis B. Over the last few years, it has been possible to treat chronic hepatitis B. Treatment very often consists of nucleos(t)ide analogs and in a few cases of pegylated alpha-interferon. In 2007, a new nucleoside analog, Telbivudine, was approved to treat chronic hepatitis B. In phase II and ongoing phase III studies, Telbivudine has proven more effective than the nucleoside analog, Lamivudine, which was very often used up until recently.

R-1626, a specific oral NS5B polymerase inhibitor of hepatitis C virus

Roche Holding AG is developing R-1626, an oral nucleoside inhibitor of HCV RNA polymerase. R-1626 has been demonstrated to be well absorbed and rapidly converted to the active component R-1479. The compound has demonstrated a strong capacity to inhibit HCV replication in vitro and in vivo, without the rapid development of viral resistance. After 4 weeks of treatment with R-1626 in combination with PEG-IFN plus ribavirin in treatment-naïve patients with genotype 1 HCV infection, HCV RNA could no longer be detected in approximately 74% of patients, compared with 5% of patients treated with PEG-IFN plus ribavirin alone, indicating the high potency of R-1626 to induce HCV RNA viral load reductions. R-1626 was generally well tolerated, although severe side effects of neutropenia were observed at high doses. A phase IIb clinical trial was ongoing at the time of publication to test the efficacy of R-1626 in combination with a standard or lower dose of PEG-IFN and ribavirin in HCV genotype 1-infected patients. Given its potent antiviral effect with an apparent high genetic barrier, R-1626 represents an important advancement in improving the outcome of patients with chronic HCV infection.

Pharmacotherapy of hepatitis B infection: a brief review

Chronic infection with hepatitis B virus can lead to liver disease, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Treatment options include interferons and antiviral drugs. The interferons have immunomodulatory, antiproliferative, and antiviral effects. Nucleoside analogs, such as entecavir, lamivudine and telbivudine, and neucleotide analogs, such as adefovir and tenofovir, exhibit antiviral effects by inhibiting viral replication. Treatment is directed at suppressing viral replication and halting the progression of disease.

Nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors differentially inhibit human LINE-1 retrotransposition

BACKGROUND

Intact LINE-1 elements are the only retrotransposons encoded by the human genome known to be capable of autonomous replication. Numerous cases of genetic disease have been traced to gene disruptions caused by LINE-1 retrotransposition events in germ-line cells. In addition, genomic instability resulting from LINE-1 retrotransposition in somatic cells has been proposed as a contributing factor to oncogenesis and to cancer progression. LINE-1 element activity may also play a role in normal physiology.

METHODS AND PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Using an in vitro LINE-1 retrotransposition reporter assay, we evaluated the abilities of several antiretroviral compounds to inhibit LINE-1 retrotransposition. The nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors (nRTIs): stavudine, zidovudine, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and lamivudine all inhibited LINE-1 retrotransposition with varying degrees of potencies, while the non-nucleoside HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitor nevirapine showed no effect.

CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE

Our data demonstrates the ability for nRTIs to suppress LINE-1 retrotransposition. This is immediately applicable to studies aimed at examining potential roles for LINE-1 retrotransposition in physiological processes. In addition, our data raises novel safety considerations for nRTIs based on their potential to disrupt physiological processes involving LINE-1 retrotransposition.

Telbivudine: new drug. Chronic hepatitis B: similar to lamivudine

Telbivudine does not offer any tangible advantage over existing treatments. It is better to continue to use lamivudine, which is known to prevent clinical complications and has been in use for many years.

Telbivudine versus lamivudine in patients with chronic hepatitis B

BACKGROUND

Reducing hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication to minimal levels is emerging as a key therapeutic goal for chronic hepatitis B.

METHODS

In this double-blind, phase 3 trial, 1370 patients with chronic hepatitis B were randomly assigned to receive 600 mg of telbivudine or 100 mg of lamivudine once daily. The primary efficacy end point was noninferiority of telbivudine to lamivudine for therapeutic response (i.e., a reduction in serum HBV DNA levels to fewer than 5 log10 copies per milliliter, along with loss of hepatitis B e antigen [HBeAg] or normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels). Secondary efficacy measures included histologic response, changes in serum HBV DNA levels, and HBeAg responses.

RESULTS

At week 52, a significantly higher proportion of HBeAg-positive patients receiving telbivudine than of those receiving lamivudine had a therapeutic response (75.3% vs. 67.0%, P=0.005) or a histologic response (64.7% vs. 56.3%, P=0.01); telbivudine also was not inferior to lamivudine for these end points in HBeAg-negative patients. In HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients, telbivudine was superior to lamivudine with respect to the mean reduction in the number of copies of HBV DNA from baseline, the proportion of patients with a reduction in HBV DNA to levels undetectable by polymerase-chain-reaction assay, and development of resistance to the drug. Elevated creatine kinase levels were more common in patients who received telbivudine, whereas elevated alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels were more common in those who received lamivudine.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B, the rates of therapeutic and histologic response at 1 year were significantly higher in patients treated with telbivudine than in patients treated with lamivudine. In both the HBeAg-negative and the HBeAg-positive groups, telbivudine demonstrated greater HBV DNA suppression with less resistance than did lamivudine. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00057265 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Telbivudine

Telbivudine, the unmodified L-enantiomer of the naturally occurring nucleoside D-thymidine, is a potent synthetic nucleoside analogue. It acts as a hepatitis B virus (HBV) polymerase inhibitor and preferentially inhibits HBV second strand (DNA-dependent) compared with first strand (RNA-dependent) DNA synthesis. More telbivudine than lamivudine recipients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B and similar proportions of telbivudine or lamivudine recipients with HBeAg-negative disease achieved a therapeutic response at 52 weeks in the large 2-year GLOBE trial. In a phase III trial in Chinese patients, greater reductions in serum HBV DNA occurred with telbivudine than lamivudine at 52 weeks. Reductions in serum HBV DNA at 24 weeks were greater with telbivudine than adefovir in the 1-year switching trial. A lower residual viral load at 52 weeks was seen in patients who received telbivudine or who switched from adefovir to telbivudine at 24 weeks than in patients receiving adefovir. In the 1-year lamivudine switching trial in patients with serum HBV DNA levels >3 log10 copies/mL despite having received prior treatment with lamivudine for a mean of [almost equal or equal to]7 months, those randomised to telbivudine therapy achieved greater reductions in serum HBV DNA levels at 24 weeks than patients randomised to continue lamivudine therapy. Telbivudine was generally well tolerated and most adverse events were of mild or moderate severity. The incidence of severe ALT flares with telbivudine was half that seen with lamivudine at both 52 and 104 weeks in the GLOBE trial.

Telbivudine: a new treatment for chronic hepatitis B

Three hundred and fifty million people worldwide are estimated to be chronically infected with hepatitis B virus. 15%-40% of these subjects will develop cirrhosis, liver failure or hepatocellular carcinoma during their life. The treatment of chronic hepatitis B has improved dramatically over the last decade merits to the advent of nucleoside/nucleotide analogues and the use of pegylated interferons. Approved drugs for chronic hepatitis B treatment include: standard interferon-alpha 2b, pegylated interferon-alpha 2a, lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil, and entecavir. Unfortunately, these agents are not effective in all patients and are associated with distinct side effects. Interferons have numerous side effects and nucleoside or nucleotide analogues, which are well tolerated, need to be used for prolonged periods, even indefinitely. However, prolonged treatment with nucleoside or nucleotide analogues is associated with a high rate of resistance. Telbivudine is a novel, orally administered nucleoside analogue for use in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. In contrast to other nucleoside analogues, Telbivudine has not been associated with inhibition of mammalian DNA polymerase with mitochondrial toxicity. Telbivudine has demonstrated potent activity against hepatitis B with a significantly higher rate of response and superior viral suppression compared with lamivudine, the standard treatment. Telbivudine has been generally well tolerated, with a low adverse effect profile, and at its effective dose, no dose-limiting toxicity has been observed. Telbivudine is one of the most potent antiviral agents for chronic hepatitis B virus and was approved by the FDA in late 2006.

Treatment of hepatitis B e antigen positive chronic hepatitis with telbivudine or adefovir: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of nucleoside and nucleotide analogues for hepatitis B has been linked to the magnitude and durability of hepatitis B virus (HBV) suppression.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the antiviral efficacy of telbivudine and adefovir dipivoxil, and the effects of switching from adefovir to telbivudine, in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients with chronic hepatitis B.

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled, open-label trial.

SETTING

16 outpatient clinics.

PATIENTS

135 treatment-naive, HBeAg-positive adults with chronic hepatitis B.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to 52 weeks of telbivudine (group A) or adefovir (group B), or 24 weeks of adefovir and then telbivudine for the remaining 28 weeks (group C). One hundred thirty-one patients completed 52 weeks of treatment.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary efficacy comparison was serum HBV DNA reduction at week 24, with a secondary comparison at week 52.

RESULTS

At week 24, mean HBV DNA reduction was greater in group A than in pooled groups B and C (-6.30 vs. -4.97 log10 copies/mL; difference, -1.33 log10 copies/mL [95% CI, -1.99 to -0.66 log(10) copies/mL]; P < 0.001), and more patients in group A were polymerase chain reaction-negative (39% vs. 12%; odds ratio, 4.46 [CI, 1.86 to 10.72]; P = 0.001). At week 52, the mean residual HBV DNA level was lower in group A and group C than in group B (3.01 log10 copies/mL [group A] and 3.02 log10 copies/mL [group C] vs. 4.00 log10 copies/mL [group B]; difference, -0.99 log10 copies/mL [CI, -1.67 to -0.32 log10 copies/mL] and -0.98 log10 copies/mL [CI, -1.64 to -0.32 log10 copies/mL]; P = 0.004). Adverse events were similar across groups; the most common were upper respiratory symptoms, headache, back pain, and diarrhea.

LIMITATIONS

The trial was open-label and was not of sufficient size or duration to compare clinical outcomes and long-term efficacy.

CONCLUSION

Telbivudine demonstrated greater and more consistent HBV DNA suppression than adefovir after 24 weeks of treatment. After 52 weeks, HBV DNA suppression was greater in patients who had received continuous telbivudine or were switched to telbivudine after 24 weeks than in those who received continuous adefovir.

Pharmacokinetics of telbivudine in subjects with various degrees of renal impairment

This study evaluates the effect of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of telbivudine. Thirty-six subjects were assigned, on the basis of creatinine clearance (CL(CR)), to 1 of 5 renal function groups with 6 to 8 subjects per group: normal renal function; mild, moderate, or severe renal impairment; or end-stage renal disease [ESRD] requiring hemodialysis. Subjects received a single oral dose of telbivudine at 600 mg (normal function and mild impairment), 400 mg (moderate impairment), or 200 mg (severe impairment and ESRD); plasma and/or urine samples were collected over a 48-h period for pharmacokinetic analyses. Telbivudine was well tolerated by all subjects. The pharmacokinetics of 600 mg of telbivudine were comparable for subjects with mild renal impairment and normal renal function. Likewise, for subjects with moderate to severe impairment, including ESRD, reduced doses from 200 to 400 mg produced plasma exposure similar to that for subjects with normal renal function. These results indicate that the pharmacokinetics of telbivudine were dependent on renal function, especially for subjects with moderate to severe renal impairment or ESRD. Apparent total plasma clearance, renal clearance (CL(R)), and urinary excretion of telbivudine decreased as renal function deteriorated. A linear relationship was established between CL(R) and CL(CR). In ESRD subjects, a routine 3.5- to 4-h hemodialysis session removed telbivudine from plasma at an extraction ratio of approximately 45%, representing a approximately 23% reduction in total exposure. These results suggest that while no adjustment of the telbivudine dose appears necessary for subjects with mild renal impairment, dose adjustment is warranted for those with moderate to severe renal impairment or ESRD in order to achieve optimal plasma exposure.

Telbivudine: a new option for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection affects > 350 million individuals worldwide. Chronic hepatitis B is associated with complications of end-stage liver disease, including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. HBV replication is the best predictor of liver disease progression to cancer, and antiviral therapy may diminish or halt this unfavorable outcome. Six drugs have been approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: interferon-alpha(2b), pegylated interferon-alpha(2a), lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir and telbivudine. Most agents designed to target hepatitis B are hindered by the development of resistance, poor tolerability or limited efficacy; therefore, new agents and treatment strategies are needed. Telbivudine is the latest approved anti-HBV agent; it is an orally administered nucleoside analog that selectively inhibits HBV replication. It has demonstrated potent activity against HBV in Phase III clinical studies, with good tolerance, lack of mitochondrial toxicity and no dose-limiting side effects.

A brief overview of mechanisms of mitochondrial toxicity from NRTIs

Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) in combinations with other antiretrovirals (highly active antiretroviral therapy, HAART) are the cornerstones of AIDS therapy, turning HIV infection into a manageable clinical entity. Despite the initial positive impact of NRTIs, therapeutic experience revealed serious side effects that appeared to originate in the mitochondria and which ultimately manifested as dysfunction of that organelle. It may be reasonable to consider that as the AIDS epidemic continues and as survival with HIV infection is prolonged by treatment with HAART, long-term side effects of NRTIs may become increasingly common. This consideration may be underscored in children who are born to HIV-infected mothers who received NRTI therapy in utero during gestation. The long-term effect of that NRTI exposure in utero is not clear yet. This review examines some proposed mechanisms of NRTI mitochondrial toxicity, including genetic predisposition, defects in mitochondria DNA replication, the encompassing "DNA pol-gamma hypothesis," the relationship between mitochondrial nucleotide and NRTI pools, mitochondrial DNA mutation and dysfunction, and oxidative stresses related to HIV infection and NRTIs. Mechanisms of mitochondrial toxicity are reviewed with respect to key cell biological, pathological, and pharmacological events.

Clinical mitochondrial dysfunction in uninfected children born to HIV-infected mothers following perinatal exposure to nucleoside analogues

Clinical and biological observations of mitochondrial dysfunction in children exposed to zidovudine (azidothymidine, AZT) during the perinatal period rapidly followed similar observations in animal experiments. To date, two different disorders have been identified. The first, asymptomatic hyperlactatemia, is observed during treatment in one third of exposed newborns, and is reversible with treatment cessation. In rare cases, it is associated with symptomatic acidosis. Regression may be slow, taking up to several months after the end of the treatment. The long-term clinical consequences of this biochemical disturbance are unknown. The second disorder involves severe neurological symptoms, which become clinically detectable during the first 2 years of life. These symptoms are associated with a series of biochemical and ultrastructural changes consistent with persistent mitochondrial dysfunction. This latter phenomenon is rare, and affects only 0.3-0.5% of exposed children in the French pediatric cohort, in which observations continue. Despite initial controversy, several similar observations in other cohorts have since confirmed its occurrence. The pathophysiology of these two mitochondrial dysfunctions may differ. Continued efforts to identify and understand clinical mitochondrial toxicities are essential, given the intensification and diversification of perinatal prophylaxis strategies, and the number of pregnant women potentially involved.

Hepatic steatosis is associated with fibrosis, nucleoside analogue use, and hepatitis C virus genotype 3 infection in HIV-seropositive patients

BACKGROUND

We conducted a study to determine the prevalence and factors associated with hepatic steatosis in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-seropositive patients with hepatitis C and to investigate whether steatosis is associated with liver fibrosis.

METHODS

Retrospective chart reviews were conducted in 4 hospitals that serve community-based and incarcerated HIV-infected patients who had undergone a liver biopsy for evaluation of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection during the period of 2000-2003. Demographic characteristics and medication and laboratory data were collected from the time of the biopsy. A pathologist blinded to all clinical data evaluated the specimens. The primary outcome was presence or absence of steatosis.

RESULTS

Of 260 HIV-HCV-coinfected patients, 183 met inclusion criteria and had a biopsy specimen adequate for review. Steatosis was present in 69% of patients (graded as minimal in 31%, mild in 27%, moderate in 18%, and severe in 1%). Factors associated with steatosis included use of dideoxynucleoside analogues, such as didanosine and stavudine (odds ratio [OR], 4.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.55-13.82). There was a trend toward presence of steatosis and use of other nucleoside analogues or infection with HCV genotype 3 (OR, 2.65 [95% CI, 0.95-7.41] and 3.38 [95% CI, 0.86-13.28], respectively). The presence of steatosis was associated with fibrosis (OR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.03-1.81).

CONCLUSIONS

In this multiracial population of HIV-HCV-coinfected patients, steatosis was prevalent and was associated with severity of liver fibrosis. Use of nucleoside analogues (particularly didanosine and stavudine) and HCV genotype 3 infection were associated with hepatic steatosis. The development of steatosis is multifactorial in nature and may play a contributory role in the progression of liver disease in HIV-infected patients.

Pharmacokinetics of telbivudine in subjects with various degrees of hepatic impairment

This study evaluated the effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of telbivudine, an investigational nucleoside antiviral for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Twenty-four subjects were assigned to four hepatic function groups (normal function and mild, moderate, and severe impairment, with six subjects in each group) on the basis of Child-Pugh scores. The subjects were administered a single oral dose of 600 mg telbivudine, and blood samples were collected over a 48-h interval for pharmacokinetic analyses. Telbivudine was well tolerated by all subjects. Telbivudine plasma concentration-time profiles were similar across the four hepatic function groups. The principal pharmacokinetic parameters of drug exposure, i.e., the maximum plasma concentration and area under the drug concentration-time curve, were comparable between subjects with various degrees of hepatic impairment and those with normal hepatic function. Results from this single-dose pharmacokinetic assessment therefore provide a pharmacologic rationale for further evaluation of the safety and efficacy of telbivudine in hepatitis B virus-infected patients with decompensated liver diseases.

Pharmacokinetics of telbivudine following oral administration of escalating single and multiple doses in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection: pharmacodynamic implications

The pharmacokinetics of telbivudine were evaluated in adult patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection following once-daily oral administration at escalating doses of 25, 50, 100, 200, 400, and 800 mg/day for 4 weeks. Telbivudine was rapidly absorbed after oral administration, with the median times T(max) to the maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) ranging from 0.8 to 3.0 h postdosing across cohorts. Single-dose and steady-state maximum C(max)s and the areas under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to time t (AUC(0-t)s) increased proportionally with dose. At steady-state, the values of C(max) and AUC(0-t) were higher than those obtained after the administration of a single dose, indicative of a slight accumulation, with the ratios of the steady-state value to the value after the administration of a single dose ranging from 1.14 to 1.49 for C(max) and from 1.40 to 1.70 for AUC(0-t). While the elimination of telbivudine from plasma was apparently monophasic over the 8-h sampling period, the substantial steady-state trough plasma levels observed in the groups receiving doses of 100 to 800 mg were clearly indicative of the presence of a second slower elimination phase, with the mean estimated half-lives ranging from 29.5 to 41.3 h by compartmental modeling analysis. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses by using maximum-effect modeling established a quantitative relationship between a reduction in serum HBV DNA levels and parameters of drug exposure, in particular, the steady-state C(max) and AUC(0-t). In summary, this study showed that telbivudine exhibits dose-proportional plasma pharmacokinetics with sustained steady-state drug exposure and exposure-related antiviral activity, supporting the need for further clinical studies by use of a once-daily regimen in patients with chronic HBV infection.

Telbivudine: a novel nucleoside analog for chronic hepatitis B

OBJECTIVE

To review available literature on the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, dosing and administration, efficacy, and safety of the antiviral nucleoside analog telbivudine.

DATA SOURCES

Information was obtained from searching MEDLINE (1966-December 2005), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-December 2005), and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (4th quarter 2005) using the search words telbivudine, L-dT, L-deoxythymidine, L-nucleosides, and nucleosides. Abstracts from the Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and European Association for the Study of the Liver were also searched, including bibliographies from the identified articles.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Data from double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials and unpublished information were extracted.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Telbivudine is a novel, orally administered nucleoside analog under development for use in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. In contrast to other nucleoside analogs, telbivudine has not been associated with inhibition of mammalian DNA polymerase with mitochondrial toxicity. Telbivudine demonstrated potent activity against hepatitis B with significantly higher rate of response and superior viral suppression compared with lamivudine, the standard treatment. Telbivudine has been generally well tolerated, with low adverse effect profile, and at its effective dose, no dose-limiting toxicity has been observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Telbivudine is a novel oral nucleoside analog effective in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B infection.

[Mitochondrial cytopathies associated with HIV infection]

The tremendous progress achieved during the last few years with the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy in suppressing HIV replication together with improvements in immunity have been tempered by a growing number of new adverse effects. Mitochondrial toxicity is one aspect of these long-term toxicities of antiretroviral drugs, with the role of nucleoside analogs particularly underlined. Some cases of impaired mitochondrial function have been clearly identified, such as pancreatitis due to didanosine, neuropathy due to zalcitabine, myopathy due to zidovudine, and lactic acidosis due to stavudine. These mitochondrial toxicities can affect several organs, presenting different patterns of symptoms: from asymptomatic to states with few symptoms despite huge metabolic abnormalities whose prognosis is immediately life-threatening. Beyond the inhibition of DNA polymerase gamma using nucleoside analogs, responsible for decreasing mitochondrial DNA in certain targeted organs, it appears that several physiopathologic mechanisms interact to explain this observed toxicity, HIV itself plays a role, and the underlying genetic pool needs to be better identified. Such cases mean that, it is imperative to avoid cumulated toxicities caused by associated treatments. With serious cases, or persistent symptoms despite discontinuing the nucleoside analogs responsible for such toxicity, one must propose vitamins, mitochondrial co-factors, or anti-oxidants. However, the future lies in the use of potent, less toxic nucleoside analogs, and in developing compounds belonging to other classes of antiretrovirals.

Synthesis and antiviral evaluation of novel exomethylene acyclic nucleosides and phosphonic acid nucleosides

This paper describes a very simple synthesis route of novel acyclic nucleosides and phosphonic acid nucleosides. The condensation of the mesylates 6 and 17 with the natural nucleosidic bases (A, C, U, T) under nucleophilic substitution (K(2)CO(3), 18-Crown-6, DMF) and deprotection afforded the target nucleosides (11, 12, 13, 14) and phosphonic acid nucleosides (22, 23, 24, 25). In addition, these compounds were evaluated for their antiviral properties against various viruses. Uracil derivative 24 shows significant anti-HCMV activity (EC(50) = 10.24 microM).

Immune Hemolytic Anemia—Selected Topics

Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) is most often idiopathic. However, in recent years, AIHA has been noted with increased incidence in patients receiving purine nucleoside analogues for hematologic malignancies; it has also been described as a complication of blood transfusion in patients who have also had alloimmunization. As the technology of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation has become more widespread, immune hemolysis in the recipients of ABO-mismatched products has become better recognized. The syndrome is caused by passenger lymphocytes transferred from the donor, and although transient, can be quite severe. A similar syndrome has been observed in recipients of solid organ transplants when there is ABO-incompatibility between donor and recipient.

Venous thromboembolism is a little-recognized, though likely common, complication of autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA), and may in some instances be related to coexistent antiphospholipid antibodies. While AIHA is a well-documented complication of malignant lymphoproliferative disorders, lymphoproliferative disorders may also paradoxically appear as a consequence of AIHA.

A number of newer options are available for treatment of AIHA in patients refractory to corticosteroids and splenectomy. Newer immunosuppressives such as mycophenolate may have a role in such cases. Considerable experience has been accumulating in the last few years with monoclonal antibody therapy, specifically rituximab, in difficult AIHA cases; it appears to be a safe and effective option.