Cross-resistance to entry inhibitors and lenacapavir resistance through Week 52 in study CAPELLA

BACKGROUND

Lenacapavir (LEN) is a first-in-class inhibitor of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) capsid function for the treatment of heavily treatment-experienced people with HIV (PWH) harbouring multidrug resistance in combination with an optimized background regimen (OBR). Here, we describe in vitro analysis of the interplay between entry inhibitors (EI; enfuvirtide, fostemsavir, ibalizumab, and maraviroc) susceptibility and LEN susceptibility in samples from 72 participants in the phase 2/3 CAPELLA study, as well as the emergence of resistance in CAPELLA through 52 weeks.

METHODS

The phenotypic susceptibility to EIs of screening samples from participants was analysed using entry assays, and susceptibility to LEN was generated. Genotypic and phenotypic resistance to LEN was evaluated for subjects with virological failure through Week 52.

RESULTS

Overall, viruses with resistance to EIs showed no cross-resistance to LEN, with a mean fold change from wild type close to 1.0. Of the 22 participants analysed for resistance through Week 52, 9 participants (13%) had emergence of capsid resistance mutation(s) while the remaining 13 participants (18%) had no change in the capsid sequence.

CONCLUSION

The gag sequence from EI-resistant isolates did not affect LEN susceptibility. The lack of cross-resistance to LEN across ARV-resistant isolates supports the use of LEN in PWH regardless of their treatment history. During the second half-year period of the CAPELLA Study, development of LEN resistance was rare and was overall associated with functional LEN monotherapy due to either nonadherence or resistance-driven non-susceptibility to OBR.

Screening and Identification of Lassa Virus Entry Inhibitors from a Fragment-Based Drug Discovery Library

Lassa virus (LASV) is a highly pathogenic virus that is categorized as a biosafety level-4 pathogen. Currently, there are no approved drugs or vaccines specific to LASV. In this study, high-throughput screening of a fragment-based drug discovery library was performed against LASV entry using a pseudotype virus bearing the LASV envelope glycoprotein complex (GPC). Two compounds, F1920 and F1965, were identified as LASV entry inhibitors that block GPC-mediated membrane fusion. Analysis of adaptive mutants demonstrated that the transient mutants L442F and I445S, as well as the constant mutant F446L, were located on the same side on the transmembrane domain of the subunit GP2 of GPC, and all the mutants conferred resistance to both F1920 and F1965. Furthermore, F1920 antiviral activity extended to other highly pathogenic mammarenaviruses, whereas F1965 was LASV-specific. Our study showed that both F1920 and F1965 provide a potential backbone for the development of lead drugs for preventing LASV infection.

Structural and Functional Characterization of the Secondary Mutation N126K Selected by Various HIV-1 Fusion Inhibitors

Peptides derived from the C-terminal heptad repeat (CHR) region of HIV-1 gp41 is potent viral membrane fusion inhibitors, such as the first clinically approved peptide drug T20 and a group of newly-designed peptides. The resistance profiles of various HIV-1 fusion inhibitors were previously characterized, and the secondary mutation N126K in the gp41 CHR was routinely identified during the in vitro and in vivo selections. In this study, the functional and structural relevance of the N126K mutation has been characterized from multiple angles. First, we show that a single N126K mutation across several HIV-1 isolates conferred mild to moderate cross-resistances. Second, the N126K mutation exerted different effects on Env-mediated HIV-1 entry and cell-cell fusion. Third, the N126K mutation did not interfere with the expression and processing of viral Env glycoproteins, but it disrupted the Asn126-based glycosylation site in gp41. Fourth, the N126K mutation was verified to enhance the thermal stability of 6-HB conformation. Fifth, we determined the crystal structure of a 6-HB bearing the N126K mutation, which revealed the interhelical and intrahelical interactions underlying the increased thermostability. Therefore, our data provide new information to understand the mechanism of HIV-1 gp41-mediated cell fusion and its resistance mode to viral fusion inhibitors.

Development of Protein- and Peptide-Based HIV Entry Inhibitors Targeting gp120 or gp41

Application of highly active antiretroviral drugs (ARDs) effectively reduces morbidity and mortality in HIV-infected individuals. However, the emergence of multiple drug-resistant strains has led to the increased failure of ARDs, thus calling for the development of anti-HIV drugs with targets or mechanisms of action different from those of the current ARDs. The first peptide-based HIV entry inhibitor, enfuvirtide, was approved by the U.S. FDA in 2003 for treatment of HIV/AIDS patients who have failed to respond to the current ARDs, which has stimulated the development of several series of protein- and peptide-based HIV entry inhibitors in preclinical and clinical studies. In this review, we highlighted the properties and mechanisms of action for those promising protein- and peptide-based HIV entry inhibitors targeting the HIV-1 gp120 or gp41 and discussed their advantages and disadvantages, compared with the current ARDs.

Monotherapy with a low-dose lipopeptide HIV fusion inhibitor maintains long-term viral suppression in rhesus macaques

Combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) dramatically improves survival of HIV-infected patients, but lifelong treatment can ultimately result in cumulative toxicities and drug resistance, thus necessitating the development of new drugs with significantly improved pharmaceutical profiles. We recently found that the fusion inhibitor T-20 (enfuvirtide)-based lipopeptides possess dramatically increased anti-HIV activity. Herein, a group of novel lipopeptides were designed with different lengths of fatty acids, identifying a stearic acid-modified lipopeptide (LP-80) with the most potent anti-HIV activity. It inhibited a large panel of divergent HIV subtypes with a mean IC₅₀ in the extremely low picomolar range, being > 5,300-fold more active than T-20 and the neutralizing antibody VRC01. It also sustained the potent activity against T-20-resistant mutants and exhibited very high therapeutic selectivity index. Pharmacokinetics of LP-80 in rats and monkeys verified its potent and long-acting anti-HIV activity. In the monkey, subcutaneous administration of 3 mg/kg LP-80 yielded serum concentrations of 1,147 ng/ml after injection 72 h and 9 ng/ml after injection 168 h (7 days), equivalent to 42,062- and 330-fold higher than the measured IC₅₀ value. In SHIV infected rhesus macaques, a single low-dose LP-80 (3 mg/kg) sharply reduced viral loads to below the limitation of detection, and twice-weekly monotherapy could maintain long-term viral suppression.

T-20 is the only clinically approved viral fusion inhibitor, which is used in combination therapy for HIV-1 infection; however, it exhibits relatively low antiviral activity and easily induces drug resistance. Here we report a lipopeptide fusion inhibitor termed LP-80, which exhibits the most potent activity in inhibiting divergent HIV-1 subtypes. Especially, LP-80 has extremely potent and long-acting therapeutic efficacy with very low cytotoxicity, making it an ideal drug candidate for clinical use. Furthermore, LP-80 and its truncated versions can be used as important probes for exploiting the mechanisms of viral fusion and inhibition.

Phase 3 Study of Ibalizumab for Multidrug-Resistant HIV-1

BACKGROUND

Ibalizumab, a humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody, blocks the entry of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) by noncompetitive binding to CD4.

METHODS

In this single-group, open-label, phase 3 study, we enrolled 40 adults with multidrug-resistant (MDR) HIV-1 infection in whom multiple antiretroviral therapies had failed. All the patients had a viral load of more than 1000 copies of HIV-1 RNA per milliliter. After a 7-day control period in which patients continued to receive their current therapy, a loading dose of 2000 mg of ibalizumab was infused; the viral load was quantified 7 days later. Through week 25 of the study, patients received 800 mg of ibalizumab every 14 days, combined with an individually optimized background regimen including at least one fully active agent. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with a decrease in viral load of at least 0.5 log₁₀ copies per milliliter from baseline (day 7) to day 14.

RESULTS

A total of 31 patients completed the study. The mean baseline viral load was 4.5 log₁₀ copies per milliliter, and the mean CD4 count was 150 per microliter. Of the 40 patients in the intention-to-treat population, 33 (83%) had a decrease in viral load of at least 0.5 log₁₀ copies per milliliter from baseline (P<0.001 for the comparison with the control period). The mean viral-load decrease was 1.1 log₁₀ copies per milliliter. During the control period, 1 patient, who received the optimized background regimen prematurely, had a decrease in viral load of 0.5 log₁₀ copies per milliliter. At week 25, patients who had received ibalizumab plus an optimized background regimen had a mean decrease of 1.6 log₁₀ copies per milliliter from baseline; 43% of the patients had a viral load of less than 50 copies per milliliter, and 50% had a viral load of less than 200 copies per milliliter. Among 10 patients who had virologic failure or rebound, in vitro testing identified 9 who had a lower degree of susceptibility to ibalizumab than at baseline. The most common adverse event was diarrhea (in 20% of patients). Four patients died from causes related to underlying illnesses; 1 had a serious adverse event (the immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome) that was deemed to be related to ibalizumab therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with MDR HIV-1 infection who had advanced disease and limited treatment options, ibalizumab had significant antiviral activity during a 25-week study. Evidence of the emergence of diminished ibalizumab susceptibility was observed in vitro in patients who had virologic failure. (Funded by the Orphan Products Clinical Trials Grants Program of the Food and Drug Administration and TaiMed Biologics; TMB-301 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02475629 .).

Strategic use of dual regimens of boosted protease inhibitors plus maraviroc in poorly adherent subjects in view of long-acting drugs: A retrospective study

In view of the forthcoming long-acting antiretrovirals, measures should be taken to prevent the selection of HIV drug resistance mutations. All subjects who had been switched to boosted protease inhibitors plus maraviroc (bPIs/MVC) with baseline HIV-1 RNA >50 copies/mL between June, 2014, and April, 2015, were retrospectively evaluated. HIV-1 RNA, CD4+ T-cells, serum glucose, creatinine, ALT, and adverse events were controlled every 3 to 4 months. We retrospectively analyzed 44 patients: 18 were taking darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) and 26 atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r) once daily, plus MVC 300 mg once daily. Seven subjects were in CDC stage C. All had a follow-up of at least 24 weeks, 28 exceeded 48 weeks, and 21 exceeded 72 weeks. All had experienced at least 1 viral failure and had selected at least 1 resistance-associated mutation (RAM). At baseline, 38 had plasma HIV-1 RNA 50-499 copies/mL and 6 had ≥500. At week 24, none had viremia >500 and 30 (68.2%) had suppressed HIV-1 RNA below 50 copies/mL. Of the subgroup with 48 weeks' follow-up, 23 had HIV-1 RNA 50-499 copies/mL, 5 had ≥500, and 20/28 suppressed to <50 copies/mL. Of the longest observed subgroup (72 weeks), 17 had HIV-1 RNA 50-499 copies/mL, and 4 had ≥500 copies/mL and 15/21 (71.4%) suppressed to <50 copies/mL. This combination allowed fair suppression of viral replication, with minor genotypic evolution in 6 subjects, and seems to be a feasible strategy to prevent damaging future options.

Tipranavir/T20-based salvage regimens highly effective and durable against HIV-1 with evidence for genotypic predictability of response in clinical practice

Escalating drug resistance in treatment-experienced HIV-1-infected patients has made management increasingly difficult. In clinical trials, tipranavir (TPV) has produced potent and durable responses in such patients, although experience in clinical cohorts is limited. A retrospective clinical case review was undertaken of triple-class experienced HIV-1-infected patients receiving optimized boosted TPV-containing regimens and T20 with up to 108 weeks follow-up. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) resistance profiles were characterized using International Aids Society (IAS)-USA scoring and 'TPV resistance score' (TPV-RS) at baseline and failure. Five of 12 patients had undetectable virus (<50 copies/mL) after median 84 weeks (range 60–108), and 1/12 < had 700 copies/mL after 40 weeks. Six of 12 patients failed after 36 (range 12–48) weeks and were more likely to have ≥3 TPV-RS mutations than non-failures ( P = 0.06). Presence of a major IAS-USA mutation at baseline was strongly associated with absence of a 1 log viral load drop at 24 weeks ( P = 0.02). TPV-containing regimens showed impressive efficacy and tolerability in this heavily experienced cohort.

Care of Patients With HIV Infection: Antiretroviral Drug Regimens

The advent of combination antiretroviral drug regimens has transformed HIV infection from a fatal illness into a manageable chronic condition. All patients with HIV infection should be considered for antiretroviral therapy, regardless of CD4 count or HIV viral load, for individual benefit and to prevent HIV transmission. Antiretroviral drugs affect HIV in several ways: entry inhibitors block HIV entry into CD4 T cells; nucleotide and nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors prevent reverse transcription from RNA to DNA via chain-terminating proteins; nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors prevent reverse transcription through enzymatic inhibition; integrase strand transfer inhibitors block integration of viral DNA into cellular DNA; protease inhibitors block maturation and production of the virus. Current guidelines recommend six combination regimens for initial therapy. Five are based on tenofovir and emtricitabine; the other uses abacavir and lamivudine. Five include integrase strand transfer inhibitors. HIV specialists should assist with treating patients with complicated HIV infection, including patients with treatment-resistant HIV infection, coinfection with hepatitis B or C virus, pregnancy, childhood infections, severe opportunistic infections, complex drug interactions, significant drug toxicity, or comorbidities. Family physicians can treat most patients with HIV infection effectively by choosing appropriate treatment regimens, monitoring patients closely, and retaining patients in care.

Maraviroc Intensification of cART in Patients with Suboptimal Immunological Recovery: A 48-Week, Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trial

OBJECTIVE

The immunomodulatory effects of the CCR5-antagonist maraviroc might be beneficial in patients with a suboptimal immunological response, but results of different cART (combination antiretroviral therapy) intensification studies are conflicting. Therefore, we performed a 48-week placebo-controlled trial to determine the effect of maraviroc intensification on CD4+ T-cell counts and immune activation in these patients.

DESIGN

Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial.

METHODS

Major inclusion criteria were 1. CD4+ T-cell count <350 cells/μL while at least two years on cART or CD4+ T-cell count <200 cells/μL while at least one year on cART, and 2. viral suppression for at least the previous 6 months. HIV-infected patients were randomized to add maraviroc (41 patients) or placebo (44 patients) to their cART regimen for 48 weeks. Changes in CD4+ T-cell counts (primary endpoint) and other immunological parameters were modeled using linear mixed effects models.

RESULTS

No significant differences for the modelled increase in CD4+ T-cell count (placebo 15.3 CD4+ T cells/μL (95% confidence interval (CI) [1.0, 29.5] versus maraviroc arm 22.9 CD4+ T cells/μL (95% CI [7.4, 38.5] p = 0.51) or alterations in the expression of markers for T-cell activation, proliferation and microbial translocation were found between the arms. However, maraviroc intensification did increase the percentage of CCR5 expressing CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells, and the plasma levels of the CCR5 ligand MIP-1β. In contrast, the percentage of ex-vivo apoptotic CD8+ and CD4+ T-cells decreased in the maraviroc arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Maraviroc intensification of cART did not increase CD4+ T-cell restoration or decrease immune activation as compared to placebo. However, ex-vivo T-cell apoptosis was decreased in the maraviroc arm.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00875368.

Pharmacokinetic interactions between BMS-626529, the active moiety of the HIV-1 attachment inhibitor prodrug BMS-663068, and ritonavir or ritonavir-boosted atazanavir in healthy subjects

BMS-663068 is a prodrug of BMS-626529, a first-in-class attachment inhibitor that binds directly to HIV-1 gp120, preventing initial viral attachment and entry into host CD4(+) T cells. This open-label, multiple-dose, four-sequence, crossover study addressed potential two-way drug-drug interactions following coadministration of BMS-663068 (BMS-626529 is a CYP3A4 substrate), atazanavir (ATV), and ritonavir (RTV) (ATV and RTV are CYP3A4 inhibitors). Thirty-six healthy subjects were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive one of four treatment sequences with three consecutive treatments: BMS-663068 at 600 mg twice daily (BID), BMS-663068 at 600 mg BID plus RTV at 100 mg once daily (QD), ATV at 300 mg QD plus RTV at 100 mg QD (RTV-boosted ATV [ATV/r]), or BMS-663068 at 600 mg BID plus ATV at 300 mg QD plus RTV at 100 mg QD. Compared with the results obtained by administration of BMS-663068 alone, coadministration of BMS-663068 with ATV/r increased the BMS-626529 maximum concentration in plasma (Cmax) and the area under the concentration-time curve in one dosing interval (AUCtau) by 68% and 54%, respectively. Similarly, coadministration of BMS-663068 with RTV increased the BMS-626529 Cmax and AUCtau by 53% and 45%, respectively. Compared with the results obtained by administration of ATV/r alone, ATV and RTV systemic exposures remained similar following coadministration of BMS-663068 with ATV/r. BMS-663068 was generally well tolerated, and there were no adverse events (AEs) leading to discontinuation, serious AEs, or deaths. Moderate increases in BMS-626529 systemic exposure were observed following coadministration of BMS-663068 with ATV/r or RTV. However, the addition of ATV to BMS-663068 plus RTV did not further increase BMS-626529 systemic exposure. ATV and RTV exposures remained similar following coadministration of BMS-663068 with either ATV/r or RTV. BMS-663068 was generally well tolerated alone or in combination with either RTV or ATV/r.

Parameters Influencing Baseline HIV-1 Genotypic Tropism Testing Related to Clinical Outcome in Patients on Maraviroc

OBJECTIVES

We analysed the impact of different parameters on genotypic tropism testing related to clinical outcome prediction in 108 patients on maraviroc (MVC) treatment.

METHODS

87 RNA and 60 DNA samples were used. The viral tropism was predicted using the geno2pheno[coreceptor] and T-CUP tools with FPR cut-offs ranging from 1%-20%. Additionally, 27 RNA and 28 DNA samples were analysed in triplicate, 43 samples with the ESTA assay and 45 with next-generation sequencing. The influence of the genotypic susceptibility score (GSS) and 16 MVC-resistance mutations on clinical outcome was also studied.

RESULTS

Concordance between single-amplification testing compared to ESTA and to NGS was in the order of 80%. Concordance with NGS was higher at lower FPR cut-offs. Detection of baseline R5 viruses in RNA and DNA samples by all methods significantly correlated with treatment success, even with FPR cut-offs of 3.75%-7.5%. Triple amplification did not improve the prediction value but reduced the number of patients eligible for MVC. No influence of the GSS or MVC-resistance mutations but adherence to treatment, on the clinical outcome was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Proviral DNA is valid to select candidates for MVC treatment. FPR cut-offs of 5%-7.5% and single amplification from RNA or DNA would assure a safe administration of MVC without excluding many patients who could benefit from this drug. In addition, the new prediction system T-CUP produced reliable results.

Cost-Effectiveness of Enfuvirtide for Treatment-Experienced Patients with HIV in Italy

BACKGROUND

Enfuvirtide (ENF) plus an optimized background (OB) antiretroviral regimen delays virological failure (VF), reduces HIV-1 viral load, and increases CD4 count compared with OB only in pretreated patients.

PURPOSE

To forecast long-term outcomes, costs, and cost-effectiveness of ENF+OB vs. OB in the Italian health care system.

METHOD

A Markov model was developed and clinical trial results on viral suppression and CD4 count were linked with data from HAART-era studies of the risk of AIDS-defining events (ADEs) and death. Resource data were obtained from Italian sources on direct medical costs. Cost-effectiveness was computed as the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) saved.

RESULTS

Patients receiving ENF+OB were projected to experience a mean time to virological failure of 1.0 years vs. 0.5 years for OB and mean time to immunological failure of 3.1 years vs. 1.3 years for OB. Life expectancy and QALYs were greater for ENF+OB than OB by 1.8 and 1.5 years, respectively. Total lifetime medical cost was euro 126,487 for ENF+OB and euro 84,416 for OB, a difference of euro 42,071 due to the cost of ENF itself (euro 18,400) and the medical costs associated with additional life expectancy (euro 23,671). The incremental cost-effectiveness of ENF+OB was euro 23,721 per life year (euro 28,669 per QALY).

CONCLUSION

ENF+OB is predicted to increase life expectancy at a cost per life year that is comparable to many well-accepted therapies in Europe.

Enfuvirtide: Antiretroviral Class 4, Drug 1

With the licensing of enfuvirtide, physicians prescribing antiretroviral medications now have available the first of a new class of drugs, the fusion inhibitors. In this article, enfuvirtide is discussed with particular emphasis on the clinical trials that led to the drug's licensing. The possible placement of enfuvirtide in the sequence of treatment is also discussed.

Prognostic Staging of Extensively Pretreated Patients with Advanced HIV-1 Disease

PURPOSE

Determinants of therapeutic success are poorly characterized in patients with extensive HAART experience. Positive prognostic factors (PPFs) in the TORO trials could serve as the basis for a prognostically meaningful staging of treatment-experienced patients initiating a new antiretroviral regimen.

METHOD

In TORO, triple-class-experienced patients with viral load (VL) > or = 5,000 copies/mL received an optimized background regimen of 3-5 antiretrovirals (based on treatment history and baseline resistance testing) +/- enfuvirtide (n = 995). Clinically relevant baseline PPFs that were predictive of 48-week virologic outcomes were identified via multiple regression analyses.

RESULTS

The likelihood of VL < 400 copies/mL at 48 weeks (ITT analysis) was greater for those patients who had baseline CD4 count > or = 100 cells/mm3 (odds ratio [OR] 2.1; 95% confidence intervals [CIs] 1.5, 3.1); baseline VL < 5 log10 copies/mL (OR 1.8; 95% CIs 1.2, 2.6); received < or = 10 prior antiretrovirals (OR 2.4; 95% CIs 1.6, 3.4); or received > or = 2 active antiretrovirals in their background treatment regimen (OR 2.3; 95% CIs 1.6, 3.3). Overall, 67% of triple-class-experienced patients who met all four prognostic criteria and received enfuvirtide achieved VL < 400 copies/mL at 48 weeks vs. 43% for non-enfuvirtide patients (p < .05). Similar results were obtained when the analysis was done separately in each of the randomization arms of the study.

CONCLUSION

Our findings provide guidance for physicians on expected outcomes in treatment-experienced patients and should be of value in their clinical management, as well as in stratifying participants in clinical trials involving treatment-experienced patients.

Quality of Life and Tolerability After Administration of Enfuvirtide with a Thin-Walled Needle: QUALITÉ Study

PURPOSE

Use of enfuvirtide-containing regimens leads to virologic and immunologic benefits and quality of life (QoL) improvements. This study (QUALITE) was designed to primarily identify baseline predictors of QoL improvements and characterize injection site reaction (ISR) signs/symptoms using a thinner/shorter needle.

METHOD

Enfuvirtide-naïve, antiretroviral (ARV)-experienced patients with CD4 counts >50 cells/mm3 enrolled in this prospective, 12-week, multisite, open-label study. Patients self-administered enfuvirtide, 90 mg bid, using thin-walled, 31-gauge/8-mm needles in combination with other ARVs. QoL was evaluated with MOS-HIV.

RESULTS

Of the 361 patients enrolled, 346 contributed to QoL assessments. Baseline median HIV RNA and CD4 counts were 4.21 log10 copies/mL and 203 cells/mm3, respectively. Although no baseline factors were predictive of week 12 QoL improvement, 9 of 11 MOS-HIV domain scores improved significantly, including physical function (p = .0002) and mental health (p = .0006). Through week 12, 87% of patients reported ISRs; 59% and 28% reported worst pain/discomfort grade < or = 1 and grade > or = 2, respectively, and none were considered serious. Patients reported that self-injection minimally impacted daily functioning or activities.

CONCLUSION

Although no predictors of QoL were identified, significant improvements in QoL were observed with minimal clinically significant ISRs (grade > or = 2) using the 31-gauge/8-mm needle.

Virologic and Immunologic Impact and Durability of Enfuvirtide-Based Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-Infected Treatment-Experienced Patients in a Clinical Setting

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of enfuvirtide-based therapy in treatment-experienced patients in a clinical setting.

METHOD

Retrospective study of treatment-experienced patients receiving enfuvirtide-based therapy for a minimum of 2 months. Endpoints included virologic suppression, virologic rebound, immunologic response, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients were eligible for inclusion in the analysis. Median baseline viral load and CD4+ count were 4.7 log10 copies/mL (interquartile range [IQR], 4.0-5.2) and 150 cells/mm3 (IQR, 60-250), respectively. At month 12, viral load declined by a median of 2.53 log10 copies/mL (IQR, 0.97-3.12). The unadjusted median time to virologic suppression was 7.7 months (95% CI 4.1-10.4 months). Baseline viral load and number of protease inhibitors in the current regimen were significantly associated with virologic suppression following multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0.45, 95% CI 0.31-0.63, p < .0001, and HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.27-0.94, p = .03, respectively). Among the 42 patients who attained sustained virologic suppression, 10 experienced virologic rebound during a median follow-up of 13.3 months (IQR, 7.0-19.1). Injection site reactions were reported in 33 (52%) patients, resulting in treatment discontinuation in nine patients.

CONCLUSION

Enfuvirtide-based therapy provides durable antiretroviral activity for treatment-experienced patients in a clinical setting.

HIV-1 and its resistance to peptidic carbohydrate-binding agents (CBAs): an overview

The glycoproteins on the surfaces of enveloped viruses, such as HIV, can be considered as a unique target for antiviral therapy. Different carbohydrate-binding agents (CBAs) target specific glycans present on viral glycoproteins of enveloped viruses. It has been shown that long-term CBA pressure in vitro can result in mutant HIV-1 isolates with several N-linked glycan deletions on gp120. These studies demonstrated that mainly high-mannose type glycans are deleted. However, interestingly, N241, N262 and N356 on gp120 have never been found to be affected after prolonged CBA exposure. Here, we review the mutation and (cross)-resistance profiles of eleven specific generated CBA-resistant HIV-1 strains. We observed that the broad-neutralizing anti-carbohydrate binding mAb 2G12 became completely inactive against all the generated CBA-resistant HIV-1 clade B isolates. In addition, all of the CBAs discussed in this review, with the exception of NICTABA, interfered with the binding of 2G12 mAb to gp120 expressed on HIV-1-infected T cells. The cross-resistance profiles of mutant HIV-1 strains are varying from increased susceptibility to very high resistance levels, even among different classes of CBAs with dissimilar sugar specificities or binding moieties [e.g., α(1,3), α(1,2), α(1,6)]. Recent studies demonstrated promising results in non-topical formulations (e.g., intranasally or subcutaneously), highlighting their potential for prevention (microbicides) and antiviral therapy.

HIV/AIDS pathogenesis and treatment options focusing on the viral entry inhibitors

The advent of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has revolutionized the treatment of HIV. A wide variety of antiretroviral agents are now available, allowing patients and physicians a choice of effective therapy. However, drug resistance and toxicities are emerging as major treatment challenges in the HAART era. The development of agents within existing and novel antiretroviral classes remains paramount in order to preserve the reduced morbidity and mortality we have come to expect from HAART use. This article details the development of the HIV epidemic, reviewing current and future treatment strategies, and concentrating upon the viral entry inhibitors.

Lack of Interaction between Enfuvirtide and Ritonavir or Ritonavir-Boosted Saquinavir in HIV-1-Infected Patients

Enfuvirtide (Fuzeon) is an HIV fusion inhibitor, the first drug in a new class of antiretrovirals. The HIV protease inhibitors ritonavir and saquinavir both inhibit cytochrome P450 (CYP450) isoenzymes, and low-dose ritonavir is often used to boost pharmacokinetic exposure to full-dose protease inhibitors. These two studies were designed to assess whether ritonavir and ritonavir-boosted saquinavir influence the steady-state pharmacokinetics of enfuvirtide. Both studies were single-center, open-label, one-sequence crossover clinical pharmacology studies in 12 HIV-1-infected patients each. Patients received enfuvirtide (90 mg twice daily [bid], subcutaneous injection) for 7 days and either ritonavir (200 mg bid, ritonavir study, orally) or saquinavir/ritonavir (1000/100 mg bid, saquinavir/ritonavir study, orally) for 4 days on days 4 to 7. Serial blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after the morning dose of enfuvirtide on days 3 and 7. Plasma concentrations for enfuvirtide, enfuvirtide metabolite, saquinavir, and ritonavir were measured using validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry methods. Efficacy and safety were also monitored. Bioequivalence criteria require the 90% confidence interval (CI) for the least squares means (LSM) of C(max) and AUC(12h) to be between 80% and 125%. In the present studies, analysis of variance showed that when coadministered with ritonavir, the ratio of LSM for enfuvirtide was 124% for C(max) (90% confidence interval [CI]: 109%-141%), 122% for AUC(12h) (90% CI: 108%-137%), and 114% for C(trough) (90% CI: 102%-128%). Although the bioequivalence criteria were not met, the increase in enfuvirtide exposure was small (< 25%) and not clinically relevant. When administered with ritonavir-boosted saquinavir, the ratio of LSM for enfuvirtide was 107% for C(max) (90% CI: 94.3%-121%) and 114% for AUC(12h) (90% CI: 105%-124%), which therefore met bioequivalence criteria, and 126% for C(trough) (90% CI: 117%-135%). The pharmacokinetics of enfuvirtide are affected to a small extent when coadministered with ritonavir at a dose of 200 mg bid but not when coadministered with a saquinavir-ritonavir combination (1000/100 mg bid). However, previous clinical studies have shown that such increases in enfuvirtide exposure are not clinically relevant. Thus, no dosage adjustments are warranted when enfuvirtide is coadministered with low-dose ritonavir or saquinavir boosted with a low dose of ritonavir.

Lack of Enzyme-Inducing Effect of Rifampicin on the Pharmacokinetics of Enfuvirtide

The primary objective was to determine whether rifampicin influences the pharmacokinetics of enfuvirtide in HIV-1-infected patients. In a single-center, open-label, one-sequence crossover, clinical pharmacology study, 12 HIV-1-infected adults received enfuvirtide (90 mg, twice daily) on days 1 to 3 and days 11 to 13 (morning dose only on days 3 and 13) and rifampicin (600 mg, once daily) from days 4 to 13. Plasma concentrations were measured for enfuvirtide and its metabolite (days 3 and 13) and rifampicin (day 13 only). The ratios of least squares means (LSM) and 90% confidence intervals for enfuvirtide and enfuvirtide metabolite pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC12h, Cmax, Ctrough) were estimated in the presence and absence of rifampicin. Treatments were compared using an analysis of variance for natural log-transformed variables, with factors patient and treatment. Efficacy and safety were also monitored. Steady-state rifampicin had no appreciable effect on any of the pharmacokinetic parameters assessed for either enfuvirtide or its metabolite. The ratio of LSM for AUC12h, Cmax, and Ctrough for enfuvirtide was 97.5%, 103%, and 84.9%, respectively, and 108%, 112%, and 92.9%, for the enfuvirtide metabolite. Rifampicin did not affect the t1/2 of enfuvirtide or its metabolite. There were no unexpected effects of rifampicin on the short-term antiviral effect or safety of the administered antiretroviral treatment. The pharmacokinetics of enfuvirtide are not induced by a 10-day pretreatment with rifampicin.

Enfuvirtide and cutaneous injection-site reactions

Enfuvirtide belongs to a newer class of antiretroviral (ARV) agents called fusion inhibitors for the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection. Enfuvirtide blocks attachment, binding, and entry of the viral capsid into the host CD4+ cell. Administration is only available subcutaneously in a twice-daily regimen particularly for those patients who have previously failed more than one ARV regimen. Common side effects of enfuvirtide administration include fatigue, insomnia, nausea, and diarrhea; however, injection-site reactions are the most common side effect and present in nearly all individuals undergoing treatment. The spectrum of cutaneous manifestations ranges from little to no reaction to cysts, nodules, induration, or sclerodermalike lesions. These reactions are mostly variants of iatrogenically induced hypersensitivity and are self-limited.

Update on clinical and methodological recommendations for genotypic determination of HIV tropism to guide the usage of CCR5 antagonists

The genotypic determination of HIV tropism to guide the use of maraviroc, the first CCR5 antagonist with specific antiviral activity against CCR5 (R5)-tropic HIV variants, has been widespread in the last two years. Retrospective analyses from maraviroc clinical trials (MOTIVATE and MERIT) demonstrated that specific genotypic tools and the phenotypic assay TrofileTM are comparable in predicting virologic response to maraviroc. Moreover, recent studies performed in cohorts of patients outside clinical trials have reported overall rates of virologic response to maraviroc up to 82% in patients harboring HIV R5-tropic variants according to genotypic tools. Specific technical requirements as well as recommendations for proper HIV tropism determination in the clinical setting have been improving, according to new data reported in several studies related with this issue. This review updates clinical and methodological recommendations for genotypic determination of HIV tropism to guide therapeutic decisions using CCR5 antagonists, considering the most recently reported data.

Qadirvirtide

Qadirvirtide is a fusion inhibitor that may be used as prophylaxis or for the treatment of AIDS. It is a synthetic peptide that is composed of 36 amino acids. Qadirvirtide blocks the entry of HIV genome into human CD4 cells by binding to HR1 as the virus can not come close to the human cell membrane and ultimately fusion of the viral envelope with human cell membrane is prohibited.

Improved survival of HIV-1-infected patients with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy receiving early 5-drug combination antiretroviral therapy

BACKGROUND

Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), a rare devastating demyelinating disease caused by the polyomavirus JC (JCV), occurs in severely immunocompromised patients, most of whom have advanced-stage HIV infection. Despite combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), 50% of patients die within 6 months of PML onset. We conducted a multicenter, open-label pilot trial evaluating the survival benefit of a five-drug cART designed to accelerate HIV replication decay and JCV-specific immune recovery.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

All the patients received an optimized cART with three or more drugs for 12 months, plus the fusion inhibitor enfuvirtide during the first 6 months. The main endpoint was the one-year survival rate. A total of 28 patients were enrolled. At entry, median CD4+ T-cell count was 53 per microliter and 86% of patients had detectable plasma HIV RNA and CSF JCV DNA levels. Seven patients died, all before month 4. The one-year survival estimate was 0.75 (95% confidence interval, 0.61 to 0.93). At month 6, JCV DNA was undetectable in the CSF of 81% of survivors. At month 12, 81% of patients had undetectable plasma HIV RNA, and the median CD4+ T-cell increment was 105 per microliter. In univariate analysis, higher total and naive CD4+ T-cell counts and lower CSF JCV DNA level at baseline were associated with better survival. JCV-specific functional memory CD4+ T-cell responses, based on a proliferation assay, were detected in 4% of patients at baseline and 43% at M12 (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

The early use of five-drug cART after PML diagnosis appears to improve survival. This is associated with recovery of anti-JCV T-cell responses and JCV clearance from CSF. A low CD4+ T-cell count (particularly naive subset) and high JCV DNA copies in CSF at PML diagnosis appear to be risk factors for death.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00120367.

Cost-effectiveness of optimized background therapy plus maraviroc for previously treated patients with R5 HIV-1 infection from the perspective of the Spanish health care system

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this work was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, from the perspective of the Spanish health care system, of optimized background therapy (OBT) plus maraviroc 300 mg BID versus OBT plus placebo in previously treated patients with R5 HIV-1 infection.

METHODS

A lifetime cohort model was developed, based on 24- and 48-week pooled results from the Maraviroc Versus Optimized Therapy in Viremic Antiretroviral Treatment-Experienced Patients (MOTIVATE) studies 1 and 2, to reflect the Spanish health care system's perspective. Treatment duration was based on clinical trial follow-up from MOTIVATE 1 and 2. Clinical data, cohort characteristics, success probability, CD4 increase rate, CD4 cell status link to disease states, and adverse-event probability were taken from the MOTIVATE trials and other published literature. Other input parameters were taken from published sources. Antiretroviral (ARV) costs were derived from local sources. Non-ARV drug costs were obtained from published literature and a cost database. All costs were calculated as year-2009 euros. The annual discount rate was set at 3.0%. The main outcomes were cost per life-year gained (LYG) and cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. Uncertainty was assessed with one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

In the model analysis, adding maraviroc to OBT was associated with an increase of 0.952 LYG and 0.909 QALY. Total costs were €275,970 for maraviroc plus OBT and €254,655 for placebo plus OBT (difference: €21,315). The incremental cost per LYG was €22,398 and the incremental cost per QALY gained was €23,457. The model appeared to be robust for variations in key parameters. Results from the probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicated that the probability of the cost per QALY being below €30,000 was 99%.

CONCLUSION

Despite the limitations of the model, our analysis suggested that OBT plus maraviroc 300 mg BID is a clinically valuable option, and cost-effective from the perspective of the Spanish health care system, for previously treated patients with R5 HIV-1 infection.

Two-year safety and tolerability study of enfuvertide use in salvage therapy of Thai HIV-1 experienced cases

OBJECTIVE

To assess safety and tolerability of enfuvirtide, an antiretroviral, in Thai patients with advanced HIV-1 disease who have received antiretroviral treatment and failed on regimens that contain at least one of each antiretroviral (ARV) classes (PIs, NRTIs, and NNRTIs), or who have intolerance to previous antiretroviral regimens.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

An open-label non-comparative study of enfuvirtide used in salvage regimens along with the backbone antiretroviral therapy of choice in Thai HIV-1 experienced cases that have been treated with at least one of each available ARV classes.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients were recruited from five participating centers. Seventeen patients (74%) completed 96 weeks of the treatment. Six patients prematurely withdrew from the present study in which three expired from HIV related complications, two withdrew consents, and one from adverse event. The most common adverse event is injection site reactions, which occurred in 22 patients. The manifestations and intensity varied from rash, erythema, edema, pain, induration, and bleeding at the injection sites, to inflammatory nodules. Most of the patients tolerated the treatment well. Enfuvirtide administered along with other antiretroviral combination provided a good control of the disease.

CONCLUSION

Enfuvirtide was well tolerated by Thai patients who participated in the present study. The adverse events did not compromise the patient compliance.

[Our experience with maraviroc treatment in HIV positive patients]

BACKGROUND; Although antiretroviral therapy has changed the clinical course of HIV infection, AIDS remains an incurable disease. Virus entry inhibitors, including maraviroc as the only registered representative of the class, represent a newly emerged group of anti-retrovirals with novel mechanism of action. The primary endpoint is to evaluate the clinical efficacy parameter of maraviroc by measuring viral load at the end of the 4 week treatment period. The secondary endpoint is to evaluate the effectiveness of the drug by monitoring the changes of the viral load values and CD4+ cell counts during the period of 125 weeks. Drug safety was also assessed.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Data of 23 subjects were collected, 21 patients were from the Czech Republic and 2 patients from France. Decrease in viral load in the 4th, 24th and 48th week was more than two orders of magnitude (-2.136; -2.448; -2.452 log10 copies/ml). The CD4+ cell count increased (71.71, 143.00, 196.43 cells/mm3). Drug safety was assessed by monitoring the frequency of adverse effects. The data obtained were compared with the III. phase of clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience with maraviroc was positive. Maraviroc proved to be an effective antiretroviral agent for a combination therapy of HIV infection.

The evolutionary analysis of emerging low frequency HIV-1 CXCR4 using variants through time--an ultra-deep approach

Large-scale parallel pyrosequencing produces unprecedented quantities of sequence data. However, when generated from viral populations current mapping software is inadequate for dealing with the high levels of variation present, resulting in the potential for biased data loss. In order to apply the 454 Life Sciences' pyrosequencing system to the study of viral populations, we have developed software for the processing of highly variable sequence data. Here we demonstrate our software by analyzing two temporally sampled HIV-1 intra-patient datasets from a clinical study of maraviroc. This drug binds the CCR5 coreceptor, thus preventing HIV-1 infection of the cell. The objective is to determine viral tropism (CCR5 versus CXCR4 usage) and track the evolution of minority CXCR4-using variants that may limit the response to a maraviroc-containing treatment regimen. Five time points (two prior to treatment) were available from each patient. We first quantify the effects of divergence on initial read k-mer mapping and demonstrate the importance of utilizing population-specific template sequences in relation to the analysis of next-generation sequence data. Then, in conjunction with coreceptor prediction algorithms that infer HIV tropism, our software was used to quantify the viral population structure pre- and post-treatment. In both cases, low frequency CXCR4-using variants (2.5-15%) were detected prior to treatment. Following phylogenetic inference, these variants were observed to exist as distinct lineages that were maintained through time. Our analysis, thus confirms the role of pre-existing CXCR4-using virus in the emergence of maraviroc-insensitive HIV. The software will have utility for the study of intra-host viral diversity and evolution of other fast evolving viruses, and is available from http://www.bioinf.manchester.ac.uk/segminator/.

Two-year safety and virologic efficacy of maraviroc in treatment-experienced patients with CCR5-tropic HIV-1 infection: 96-week combined analysis of MOTIVATE 1 and 2

BACKGROUND

Maraviroc, the first approved CCR5 antagonist, demonstrated 48-week safety and virologic efficacy in CCR5-tropic HIV-infected, treatment-experienced patients; however, critical longer-term safety and durability of responses are unknown.

METHODS

Two-year follow-up of 2 prospective, randomized, blinded studies of maraviroc once daily or twice daily, or placebo in treatment-experienced patients with R5-tropic HIV-1 receiving an optimized background regimen. Unblinding occurred after the week-48 visit of the last enrolled patient. Safety and virologic parameters were assessed through week 96.

RESULTS

One thousand forty-nine patients were randomized and received study drugs. HIV-1 RNA was <50 copies per milliliter at week 96 in 39% and 41% of patients receiving maraviroc every day or twice a day, respectively. Among patients with HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per milliliter at week 48, 81% and 87% of patients receiving maraviroc every day or twice a day, respectively, maintained this response at week 96. At week 96, median CD4+ T-cell counts increased from baseline by 89 and 113 cells per cubic millimeter with maraviroc every day and twice a day, respectively. Exposure-adjusted rates of adverse events were similar with maraviroc or placebo. No new or unexpected events were observed after week 48.

CONCLUSIONS

Maraviroc-containing antiretroviral regimens maintained durable responses in treatment-experienced patients with R5 HIV-1 through 96 weeks of treatment with a safety profile similar to placebo.

Cost-effectiveness of maraviroc for antiretroviral treatment-experienced HIV-infected individuals in Mexico

OBJECTIVE

Maraviroc is the first approved drug in a new class of antiretrovirals, the CCR5 antagonists. The objective of this study was to predict the long-term clinical impact and cost-effectiveness of maraviroc in treatment-experienced adults with HIV/AIDS in Mexico.

METHODS

The AntiRetroviral Analysis by Monte Carlo Individual Simulation (ARAMIS) model was adapted to the Mexican context to predict clinical and economic outcomes of treating with optimized background therapy (OBT) versus testing for viral tropism status and treating with OBT ± maraviroc accordingly in treatment-experienced adults in Mexico. Baseline characteristics and efficacy were from the MOTIVATE trials' screening cohort. Costs and population mortality data were specific to Mexico. Results were reported from the perspective of health care payers in 2008 Mexican pesos (converted to 2008 US$ in parentheses).

RESULTS

Compared to treatment with OBT alone, treatment with OBT ± maraviroc contingent on tropism test result increased projected undiscounted life expectancy and discounted quality-adjusted life expectancy from 7.54 to 8.71 years and 4.42 to 4.92 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), respectively, at an incremental cost of $228,215 (US$21,329). The resultant incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was $453,978 (US$42,429) per QALY gained. The ICER was somewhat lower when maraviroc was modeled in individuals susceptible to ≤ 2 components of OBT ($407,329; US$38,069), while the ICER was higher in individuals susceptible to ≥3 OBT components ($718,718; US$67,171).

CONCLUSION

In treatment-experienced individuals with HIV/AIDS in Mexico, maraviroc may be cost-effective, particularly in individuals with limited options for active antiretroviral therapy (ART).

Maraviroc first-line therapy for HIV infection. Too risky

First-line treatment for HIV infection currently comprises a combination of antiretroviral drugs, including a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor such as efavirenz, or one or two protease inhibitors.The choice is based on the results of initial clinical trials of antiretroviral drugs with morbidity and mortality endpoints, and, since the 1990s, on trials with surrogate markers (viral load and the CD4+ T lymphocyte count). Maraviroc is the only CCR5 antagonist currently on the market. Drugs belonging to this class are designed to prevent HIV entry into CD4 T lymphocytes. Maraviroc is reserved for patients with multiple treatment failure, but has also been proposed for first-line treatment. Clinical evaluation of maraviroc in first-line treatment is limited to a single comparative trial designed to show the virological and immunological "non-inferiority" of the maraviroc + zidovudine + lamivudine combination versus efavirenz + zidovudine + lamivudine, after 96 weeks of treatment, in 721 patients with CCR5-tropic HIV strains. A more sensitive version of the test used to determine CCR5 tropism became available during the trial, leading to the exclusion of 107 patients who were infected by strains capable of using other coreceptors. This trial fails to answer important questions regarding the adverse effects of maraviroc, such as hepatotoxicity, infections, cancer, and cardiovascular disorders. Tests used to identify exclusively CCR5-tropic HIV strains are difficult to implement and their results are unreliable. This means that some patients in whom maraviroc will not be effective may receive this drug, and will thus be at risk of developing viral resistance to other drugs in their antiretroviral regimen. In practice, first-line use of maraviroc is imprudent, as it depends on a test of uncertain reliability. Furthermore, there is no evidence to suggest that maraviroc combination therapy has a better risk-benefit balance than regimens with well-documented and long established efficacy.

Effects of maraviroc and efavirenz on markers of immune activation and inflammation and associations with CD4+ cell rises in HIV-infected patients

BACKGROUND

Maraviroc treatment for HIV-1 infected patients results in larger CD4(+) T cell rises than are attributable to its antiviral activity alone. We investigated whether this is due to modulation of T cell activation and inflammation.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

Thirty maraviroc-treated patients from the Maraviroc versus Efavirenz Regimens as Initial Therapy (MERIT) study were randomly selected from among those who had CCR5-tropic (R5) HIV on screening and achieved undetectable HIV RNA (<50 copies/mL) by Week 48. Efavirenz-treated controls were matched for baseline characteristics to the maraviroc-treated patients selected for this substudy. Changes in immune activation and inflammation markers were examined for associations with CD4(+) T cell changes. Maraviroc treatment tended to result in more rapid decreases in CD38 expression on CD4(+) T cells and in plasma D-dimer concentrations than did treatment with efavirenz. The proportion of patients with high-sensitivity C-reactive protein >2 µg/mL increased from 45% to 66% in the efavirenz arm, but remained constant in the maraviroc arm (P = 0.033). Decreases in CD38 expression on CD8(+) T cells were correlated with CD4(+) T cell rises for maraviroc treatment (r = -0.4, P = 0.048), but not for treatment with efavirenz.

CONCLUSIONS

Maraviroc-treated patients had earlier, modest decreases in certain markers of immune activation and inflammation, although in this small study, many of the differences were not statistically significant. Levels of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein remained constant in the maraviroc arm and increased in the efavirenz arm. Decreases in immune activation correlated with increased CD4(+) T cell gains.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00098293.

Genotypic determination of HIV tropism - clinical and methodological recommendations to guide the therapeutic use of CCR5 antagonists

The approval of maraviroc (Selzentri®), the first CCR5 antagonist, with specific antiviral activity against CCR5 (R5)-tropic HIV variants, has promoted the determination of HIV coreceptor usage in the clinical setting. The phenotypic assay Trofile™, which is based on recombinant virus technology, has been the most widely used diagnostic test, given that it was the only assay which provided tropism information in the pivotal maraviroc clinical trials. However, this method displays logistical and technical limitations that make it far from convenient as a diagnostic test in clinical practice. Genotypic methods based on V3 genotyping represent a more feasible alternative and progressively are replacing phenotypic assays. Even though their sensitivity to detect X4-tropic variants is lower compared to Trofile™, recent studies have demonstrated that specific genotypic tools (geno2pheno and PSSM) are comparable to Trofile™ and ES-Trofile™ in predicting virologic response to maraviroc. This review summarizes clinical and methodological recommendations for the genotypic determination of HIV tropism to guide therapeutic decisions with CCR5 antagonists in HIV therapeutics.

International society for antiviral research - 23rd international conference

The 23rd International Conference on Antiviral Research (ICAR), organized by the International Society for Antiviral Research (ISAR) and held in San Francisco, included topics covering new therapeutic developments in the field of antivirals. This conference report highlights selected presentations on CD4-BFFI (Roche Holding AG), a CD4 mAb-based bifunctional HIV entry inhibitor; a CLDC-HBsAg vaccine (Juvaris BioTherapeutics Inc/China National Biotec Group) against HBV; ODE-(S)-MPMPA (University of California San Diego), a potent anti-HCV compound; the anti-human CMV activity exhibited by tricin; the protective activity of Ingavirin against influenza A; and Prosetta Bioconformatics's approach to identifying small-molecule antivirals.

[Integrase inhibitor, CCR5 antagonist, fusion inhibitor]

Integrase inhibitors have a novel antiretroviral mechanism which prevents proviral DNA integration into the CD4+ cell chromosome. Promising results have been seen in clinical trials in treatment-naïve and -experienced infected individuals. CCR5 antagonists bind to CCR5, one of the second receptors of HIV-1, and inhibit HIV-1 entry into CD4+ cells. However, they cannot prevent the cell entry of HIV-1s which can use another second receptor, CXCR4. Fusion inhibitors are synthetic peptides which mimic a fragment of HIV-1 gp41. They can bind a counterpart portion of HIV-1 gp41 and prevent the fusion of viral and cellular membranes, one of the critical steps of HIV-1 entry into CD4+ cells.

[The newest developments in anti-HIV-1 drugs]

In the two decades since AZT was first approved for clinical use in 1987, 24 additional antiretroviral agents have been approved. They include 7 nucleoside analogs, a nucleotide analog and 4 non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, 10 protease inhibitors, 2 entry inhibitors and an integrase inhibitor. More than 20 investigational agents are currently being studied in clinical trials. Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), which involves a combination of anti-HIV-1 drugs, is extremely effective in suppressing HIV-1 replication and increasing CD4+ number and results in substantial reductions in HIV-1-related morbidity and mortality. In last 20 years, much has been learned about resistance to antiretroviral drugs, drug interactions and metabolic complications of antiviral drug use. Drugs are now selected on the basis of resistance tests and on the risk of specific drug complications in individual patients. As a result, decisions about the therapy of HIV/AIDS have become personalized and are made on a patient-by-patient basis. With appropriate medical management, a person with HIV-1 now has the possibility of a nearly normal life expectancy.

HIV entry inhibitors: progress in development and application

This review discusses recent progress in the development of anti-HIV agents, with emphasis on small molecule HIV-1 entry inhibitors. The entry inhibitors primarily target HIV-1 envelope glycoproteins or the cellular receptors, CD4 and chemokine receptors. Two of the entry inhibitors, enfuvirtide and maraviroc, have been approved by the US FDA for AIDS therapy. The drug resistance associated with some of the entry inhibitors will also be discussed.

[Advances in novel anti-HIV-1 drugs and drug candidates: 2005-2008]

HIV and AIDS remain as the crucial global health concern, therefore, research and development of novel anti-HIV-1 chemical therapeutics is still of paramount significance, which may be illuminated by cases of successful marketed drugs. Herein, we document the discovery and biological profile of new anti-HIV-1 drugs approved by FDA between 2005 and 2008 and some drug candidates are also discussed.

The development of anti-HIV-1 drugs

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) is the causative agent of acquired immunodeficiency disease syndrome (AIDS). After over 26 years of efforts, there is still not a therapeutic cure or an effective vaccine against HIV/AIDS. The clinical management of HIV-1 infected people largely relies on antiretroviral therapy (ART). Although highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has provided an effective way to treat AIDS patients, the huge burden of ART in developing countries, together with the increasing incidence of drug resistant viruses among treated people, calls for continuous efforts for the development of anti-HIV-1 drugs. Currently, four classes of over 30 licensed antiretrovirals (ARVs) and combination regimens of these ARVs are in use clinically including: reverse transcriptase inhibitors (RTIs) (e.g. nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, NRTIs; and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, NNRTIs), protease inhibitors (PIs), integrase inhibitors and entry inhibitors (e.g. fusion inhibitors and CCR5 antagonists). Here, we intend to provide updated information of currently available antiretroviral drugs for ART to promote the development of novel anti-HIV-1 drugs.

Efficacy and safety of a salvage regimen based on tipranavir, enfuvirtide and three nucleoside analogues in HIV1 infected patients with clinical progression: 96-week evaluation

In recent years, novel antiretroviral drugs have become available for multi-experienced HIV-infected patients with limited options. We enrolled seven advanced HIV-patients, failing multiple previous HAART regimens, in virological failure on their current HAART regimen and showing recent clinical and immunological progression. All patients were prescribed a double-boosted tipranavir plus enfuvirtide based regimen, in addition to zidovudine, tenofovir and lamivudine for salvage therapy. To assess susceptibility to tipranavir, the tipranavir genotypic resistance score was calculated and two years later this was re-evaluated on an updated tipranavir genotypic score algorithm. At baseline, CD4 were 139/mcL (more or less 145), HIV-1 RNA was 822,700 cp/mL. All patients achieved HIV-1 RNA levels less than 400 cp/mL between 12 weeks and 24 weeks of observation; two reached less than 50 cp/mL during this period. At 48 weeks three patients had reached less than 50 cp/mL; three other patients had HIV RNA less than 200 cp/mL. At 72 and 96 weeks HIV viraemia was less than 50 cp/mL in six patients; CD4 T-cell counts 285/mcL (more o less 198). No AIDS-defining events were recorded. Adverse events did not need to stop or change HAART. Strong 3 NRTI backbone could help efficacy and durability, and frequent evaluations in complex patients can help to manage toxicity.