Docetaxel in combination with gemcitabine plus rhG-CSF support as second-line treatment in non-small cell lung cancer. A multicenter phase II study

Weekly Vinorelbine and Docetaxel as Second-Line Chemotherapy for Pretreated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: a Phase I-II Trial

Docetaxel was proven to be effective as second-line therapy for patients with advanced NSCLC after failure of platinum-based front-line chemotherapy. We designed this phase I/II study to define the Maximum Tolerated Dose of weekly docetaxel combined with weekly vinorelbine, and subsequently evaluate tolerability and activity of this schedule in NSCLC patients who were progressive after treatment with either cisplatin and gemcitabine or carboplatin and paclitaxel regimens. To be eligible for the study, patients were required to have a WHO performance status < or =2, failure after at least two cycles of first platinum-based chemotherapy, and no prior treatment with docetaxel and vinorelbine. A total of 27 patients were enrolled in this phase I/II study. A weekly docetaxel dose of 25 mg/m2 was recommended in combination with fixed vinorelbine dose of 20 mg/m2, and 24 patients were treated at this dose level. Severe neutropenia (62%) and febrile neutropenia (29%) were the most frequent toxicities, with 83% of patients requiring dose modification or delay. In the phase II study, 5 (21%) patients obtained a partial response, 8 (33%) patients had stable disease, whereas 10 (42%) patients progressed. After a median follow-up of 18.7 months, median survival was 8 months, with 30% surviving at 1 year. Regardless of the use of weekly docetaxel schedule, this regimen was highly myelosuppressive, and did not seem to improve response rate and survival compared to single-agent docetaxel. No further developments of this schedule are warranted.

Pulmonary toxicity among cancer patients treated with a combination of docetaxel and gemcitabine: a meta-analysis of clinical trials

PURPOSE

The combination of docetaxel and gemcitabine was tested in several studies in patients with lung, breast, and pancreatic cancers and other tumor entities. Some studies reported cases of severe or even fatal pulmonary toxicity that led to early termination of some trials. We created a meta-analysis model of published studies to identify explanatory factors for docetaxel-gemcitabine-dependent pulmonary toxicity.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE/Pubmed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Clinical Trials database for prospective full-text studies that used a schedule of docetaxel and gemcitabine to treat a malignant disease. We performed a meta-analysis for proportions using the arcsine transformation and a meta-regression using a generalized linear mixed model based on a binomial distribution and a logit link.

RESULTS

We included 103 trials with 113 treatment arms comprising 5,065 patients (major entities included non-small cell lung cancer (n = 2,550), breast cancer (n = 1,119), pancreatic cancer (n = 466), and urothelial cancer (n = 161)). For the incidence of severe lung toxicity (common toxicity criteria [CTC] grades 3-5), we found a combined estimate of 2.70% (95% CI 2.26, 3.14). The estimate for the proportion of fatal cases was 0.35% (95% CI 0.21, 0.58). We found that the sequence of the chemotherapy schedule had no influence on the incidence of severe pulmonary adverse events (F-test F = 0.65, df = 3,113, P = 0.58) nor did the study phase, treatment line or ethnicity of the participants. We found that patients with breast cancer, compared to lung cancer patients, developed severe lung toxicity less frequently (OR = 0.18, 95% CI (0.09, 0.36)).

CONCLUSION

We could not demonstrate that a particular chemotherapy sequence of docetaxel-gemcitabine is associated with excess pulmonary toxicity. Patients with lung cancer are at a higher risk for severe pulmonary side effects with docetaxel-gemcitabine than are patients with breast cancer.

Phase I/II study of gemcitabine and exisulind as second-line therapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of exisulind, a selective apoptotic antineoplastic drug, in combination with gemcitabine as second-line therapy in patients with progressing advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Patients whose disease progressed more than 3 months from completion of first-line chemotherapy were eligible for this phase I/II trial. Primary end points were maximally tolerated dose and time to progression. Patients in the phase I portion of the study were treated with gemcitabine (1250 mg/m) in combination with three escalated dose levels of exisulind. Treatment involved six cycles of gemcitabine and exisulind followed by exisulind maintenance. The study was subsequently expanded to phase II.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients (15 in phase I and 24 in phase II) were treated. The regimen was well tolerated with grade 3 fatigue and grade 3 constipation being dose-limiting toxicities. The maximally tolerated dose was not reached. Dose level 3 of exisulind (250 mg twice daily) in combination with gemcitabine was used for phase II. The overall response rates were 7% (phase I), 17% (phase II), and 13% (all). Median time to progression and median and 1-year survival, respectively, were 3.7 and 9.7 months and 33% (phase I); 4.3 and 9.4 months and 41% (phase II); and 4.1 and 9.4 months and 39% (all).

CONCLUSION

Although the study met its primary end point of improving time to progression (more than 4.1 months in phase II), we did not observe a clear survival advantage and thus do not plan to further investigate this schedule of gemcitabine and exisulind.

A phase II study of days 1 and 8 combination of docetaxel plus gemcitabine for the second-line treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer and good performance status

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of a combination consisting of second-line docetaxel and gemcitabine in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

histologically confirmed advanced NSCLC with progressive disease to platinum-based chemotherapy, ECOG performance status (PS) 0 or 1, and adequate kidney, liver and bone marrow function. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 36 mg/m(2) i.v. over 60 min followed by gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) i.v. over 30 min on days 1 and 8 of each 3-week cycle for a planned six cycles or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

Of the 52 patients enrolled, 50 were evaluable for response and toxicity. The mean age was 59 years (range 42-79), 46 male and 4 female. Histology subtypes were: adenocarcinoma 26 patients, bronchioloalveolar 1 patient, large cell carcinoma 5 patients, and squamous cell carcinoma 18 patients. Thirty-eight patients had ECOG PS 1 and 12 patients had PS 0. The median number of cycles administered was four (range 2-6). The overall response rate was 28%. The median follow-up was 9 months (range 5-34 months). The median survival time (MST) was 8.2 months (95% CI, 4-12%), and the 1-year survival was 25%. The median progression-free survival was 4.4 months (95% CI, 2-6%). In the Cox regression model, survival was only significantly affected by the PS. The median survival in patients with PS 0 was 17.8 months (95% CI, 18.8-21.8%) compared with a median survival for patients with PS 1 of 6.1 months (95% CI, 4.1-8.2%) (P=0.0057).

TOXICITY

three patients had grade 3 anemia, three patients had grade 3 thrombocytopenia, four patients had grade 3 neutropenia and only one patient developed grade 4 febrile neutropenia. Non-hematologic toxicity was also mild; the most frequent was asthenia, with grade 3 in eight patients (16%), and one patient with grade 4.

CONCLUSION

This regimen of docetaxel in combination with gemcitabine in advanced second-line NSCLC is an active and safe regimen.

Phase II trial of weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

A platinum doublet has been the standard treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and good performance status. This treatment results in almost a doubling of 1-yr survival, along with an improvement in quality of life despite treatment-related toxicities. However, platinum-based treatment may be associated with significant toxicity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this trial, we prospectively evaluated a weekly regimen of docetaxel and gemcitabine for advanced NSCLC. The endpoints of this study included objective response rate, survival, and toxicity. Forty-two patients with previously untreated, advanced NSCLC with PS 0-1 were included. Patients received docetaxel (36 mg/m2) and gemcitabine (600 mg/m2) on d 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-d cycle. Responses were assessed every two cycles. The median age was 63 yr; with 22 males and 20 females; 67% were >or=60 years old; and 38 patients had stage IV disease.

RESULTS

In the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis of response, 16 patients had a partial response (38%) and 15 patients had stable disease (36%). The 1-yr survival was 48%; median survival for all patients was 11.3 mo and the median progression-free survival was 5.1 mo. Toxicities (>or= grade 3) included neutropenia (29%), asthenia (26%), diarrhea (14%), thrombocytopenia (10%), pneumonitis (7%), peripheral neuropathy (5%), peripheral edema (5%), nail changes (2%), and myositis (2%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that this non-platinum doublet (docetaxel + gemcitabine) given on a weekly schedule for advanced NSCLC was well tolerated with efficacy comparable to that reported with platinum-based chemotherapy regimens.

A Retrospective Analysis of Second-Line Chemotherapy or Best Supportive Care in Patients with Advanced-Stage Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

We retrospectively evaluated the clinical characteristics and outcome of patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) enrolled in first-line chemotherapy trials conducted by our group with respect to receiving or not receiving subsequent treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were collected from 634 patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC treated with platinum and nonplatinum agent-based first-line regimens. Patient survival was calculated from the day of registration to first-line chemotherapy trials (OS1) as well as from the day of first-line treatment failure or the initiation of second-line chemotherapy (OS2) until death. The decision for administering second-line chemotherapy was, in all cases, at the discretion of the physician. Two hundred twenty-four patients (35.3%) received second-line chemotherapy (second-line group) in the context of second-line clinical trials run by the same group, and 410 (64.7%) received best supportive care (BSC group). There were significant differences between second-line and BSC groups in terms of age, histology, early discontinuation of first-line chemotherapy, and performance status after first-line treatment.

RESULTS

Three (1.3%) complete and 25 (11.2%) partial responses to second-line chemotherapy were observed for an overall response rate of 12.5% (95% confidence interval, 8.2%-16.8%). The median OS1 was 13 months and 7 months (P < 0.001) and the OS2, 7 months and 3 months (P < 0.001) for the second-line and BSC groups, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that good performance status, disease stage IIIB, response to first-line treatment, and late termination of first-line chemotherapy were significantly associated with increased survival. The administration of second-line chemotherapy was also independently correlated with better outcome.

CONCLUSION

The second-line chemotherapy and BSC groups represent different populations of patients with NSCLC. Factors indicative of increased probability of survival could be used to identify the subgroup of patients most likely to benefit from second-line chemotherapy.

Granulocyte growth factors in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Neutropenia and subsequent infections are common events that limit treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Granulocyte growth factors (G- and GM-CSF) have been introduced in clinical practice and their use has yielded a reduction of the infection risk related to chemotherapy and a dose increase of drug delivery. Randomized clinical trials have shown that granulocyte colony-stimulating factors and, more recently, the longer-acting pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (pegfilgrastim) effectively reduce the incidence and severity of neutropenia and of its complications. Recommendations for the use of haematopoietic colony-stimulating factors from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) have been published in 1994 and updated in 1996, 1997 and 2000. Recently, moreover, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines for the myeloid growth factors in cancer treatment make available. Chemotherapy-associated myelosuppression is a major limitation of anticancer therapy also in early stage, local advanced and metastatic NSCLC. Recently, dose-dense chemotherapy has been shown to improve the outcome in early stage breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. However, few randomized trials have been reported on chemotherapy with or without granulocyte growth factors as primary prophylaxis in NSCLC. Presently, there is no evidence for a benefit in response rate and survival from the use of granulocyte growth factors as support of chemotherapy, in particular, for locally advanced and metastatic NSCLC. In clinical practice, the role of granulocyte growth factors for NSCLC treatment should be limited following the guidelines. An appropriate use of granulocyte growth factors may reduce the overall cost of treatment and improve the quality of life, important aims in the treatment of patients with local advanced or metastatic NSCLC. In the future, we need to identify patients who can benefit from granulocyte growth factors for optimize the schedule and doses, in advanced disease and also, after the recent positive results of adjuvant chemotherapy, in early stages. This review summarizes the present knowledge on the use of granulocyte growth factors in NSCLC.

Second-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Among advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, most will resist or relapse after first-line chemotherapy. As a result, second-line therapy has been a major focus for clinical research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A systematic review was carried out from 1996 to February 2005.

RESULTS

Second-line chemotherapy provides pre-treated NSCLC patients with a clear survival advantage. Docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks is the present standard second-line chemotherapy. Despite promising results regarding efficacy and toxicity in phase III studies, a docetaxel weekly schedule could not be recommended. Pemetrexed recently emerged as an alternative with similar efficacy and less toxicity. Although the combination of two drugs was not associated with a survival benefit when compared with single-agent chemotherapy, such regimens induced a dramatic increase in toxicities and therefore mono-chemotherapy remains the standard as second-line therapy. Finally, few new agents were reported with better results than those used previously and clinical research on second-line therapy currently focuses on combinations with targeted therapies.

CONCLUSION

Second-line chemotherapy offers NSCLC patients a small but significant survival improvement. However, this field of clinical research needs further investigations in order to answer certain remaining questions especially concerning targeted therapies.

Results of a phase II multicenter trial of weekly docetaxel and gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Standard treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) consists of platinum based combination chemotherapy but efficacy is limited and treatment can be toxic. This trial evaluated a weekly regimen of docetaxel and gemcitabine for advanced NSCLC. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. Other endpoints were 1-year survival, median survival, median duration of response, median disease-free progression, safety, and quality of life.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty patients with advanced NSCLC were treated. Patients received docetaxel (1 per week, 36 mg/m(2)) weeks 1-6 and gemcitabine (1 per week, 900 mg/m(2)) weeks 1, 2, 4, and 5. Each 8-week cycle was repeated for a total of three cycles. Patients completed quality of life surveys (FACT-L) before each cycle.

RESULTS

The median age was 68.5 years; 74% were >60 years old. In the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis of response, 10 patients had a partial response (20%) and five patients had stable disease (10%). The 1-year survival was 32%; median survival for all patients was 6.9 months (range, <1-26.2) and the median progression-free survival was 5.1 months (range, <1-25.5). Toxicities (> grade 3) included neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, GI disorders (nausea, vomiting, dehydration, diarrhea, stomach pain), and asthenia; 10 patients experienced hematological toxicities that were > grade 3. Quality of life decreased during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that the nonplatinum doublet (docetaxel + gemcitabine) given on a weekly schedule for advanced NSCLC had efficacy similar to that reported with other regimens and was well tolerated. Therefore, this non-platinum based regimen appears promising and warrants further evaluation.

A Phase I/II Study Comparing Regimen Schedules of Gemcitabine and Docetaxel in Japanese Patients with Stage IIIB/IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVE

Gemcitabine and docetaxel are non-platinum agents with activity in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study was conducted to determine and evaluate the recommended regimen of gemcitabine-docetaxel and evaluated its efficacy and safety in chemonaive Japanese NSCLC patients.

METHODS

In phase I, patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were randomized and received either gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 plus docetaxel on day 1 or gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 plus docetaxel on day 8. The recommended regimen was the dose level preceding the maximum tolerated dose; once determined, patients were enrolled in phase II. Efficacy and toxicity were evaluated in all patients.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were enrolled in phase I and six patients were given the recommended regimen; gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 plus docetaxel 50 mg/m(2) on day 8. An additional 34 patients were enrolled into phase II and administered with the recommended regimen. The response rate was 32.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 20.6-45.6%] overall and 30.0% (95% CI 16.6-46.5%) in patients with the recommended regimen (40 patients). Although grade 3 interstitial pneumonia was observed in two patients (5.0%) who received the recommended regimen, both recovered shortly after steroid treatment. No unexpected events were observed throughout this study.

CONCLUSIONS

Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 plus docetaxel 50 mg/m(2) on day 8 has comparable efficacy and more tolerable toxicities than previously reported platinum-based regimens. These results should be verified by a phase III study.

Innovative sequence of docetaxel–gemcitabine based on preclinical data in the treatment of advanced non small cell lung cancer: a phase I study

Based on our previous preclinical data, a phase I study was designed to investigate the tolerability of a novel sequence, docetaxel (DOC)-gemcitabine (GEM), in the treatment of non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Preclinical study: We evaluated the cytotoxicity of DOC and GEM on NSCLC cell lines and assessed the type of interaction between drug activities following different treatment schemes. Clinical study: Fifteen patients with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC received DOC (day 1) and GEM (days 3 and 8) every 21 days. Dose escalation of both agents was used to identify the maximum tolerated dose. The study was closed at the fifth dose level due to the occurrence of three dose-limiting toxicities: grade 4 febrile neutropoenia, persistent grade 2 fever and grade 3 diarrhoea. The most frequent toxicity was neutropoenia. Non haematological toxicities were diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting, mucositis and alopoecia. Of the 14 evaluable patients, 1 complete response, 4 partial responses, 4 stable diseases and 5 disease progressions were observed. Based on the results of the present study, a phase II trial is ongoing using the fourth dose levels.

Phase II study of docetaxel and carboplatin as second-line treatment in NSCLC

Aim of this study was to evaluate activity and toxicity of docetaxel and carboplatin as second-line treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who failed or relapsed after previous chemotherapy. Patients had to have unresectable stage IIIb or IV NSCLC, previous chemotherapy, a performance status < or = 2, a normal bone marrow reserve, and an adequate renal and liver function. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and carboplatin AUC 6 mg/ml min administered every 3 weeks for a maximum of 5 cycles. Fifty-seven patients with a median age of 57 years were included. Prior treatment consisted of gemcitabine alone (n = 2) or gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin (n = 26) or epirubicin (n = 29). Median number of cycles for carboplatin and docetaxel was 4. Granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia common toxicity criteria (CTC) grades 3 and 4 occurred in 79 and 30% of patients, respectively. Febrile neutropenia occurred in eight patients (14%), of whom two patients died. Fatigue grades 2 and 3 occurred in 42% of patients. Other non-haematological toxicity was mild. Tumour response rate was 37%, irrespective of the previous regimen. Median survival was 31 weeks, 1-year survival was 32%. In conclusion, the combination of docetaxel and carboplatin is active as second-line treatment in platinum and non-platinum pre-treated patients.

The use of colony stimulating factors in elderly patients with cancer

Hematological toxicity is the most common and the most frequent fatal complication of chemotherapy. It is observed with increased frequency with age, it is a significant independent predictor of the development of febrile neutropenia, and may contribute to a reluctance to administer chemotherapy in the elderly patient population. The authors analyze published data on effectiveness and results of the use of colony stimulating factors for preventing and treating elderly patients affected by tumors during chemotherapy.

Comparison of antiangiogenic activities using paclitaxel (taxol) and docetaxel (taxotere)

Tumor growth requires a competent vascular supply and angiogenesis has been considered as a potential target for the treatment of several cancers. The two clinically approved taxanes, paclitaxel and docetaxel, are novel antimitotic agents that are under extensive investigation in clinical trials. Both taxanes have demonstrated significant activity against many solid tumors, but little is known about the effect of paclitaxel and docetaxel on endothelial cell function and angiogenic processes. The purpose of our study was to examine and compare the effects of these drugs on angiogenic processes in vitro and in vivo. These processes include: proliferation, migration and differentiation of cultured human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) (in vitro), capillary sprouting of rat aortic ring explants (ex vivo) and HT1080 tumor growth in vivo. Our results demonstrate that endothelial cells are 10-100-fold more sensitive to these drugs than tumor cells. Additionally, comparison of the taxanes demonstrated that angiogenesis is blocked by both drugs primarily via inhibition of proliferation and differentiation (tube assay) and induction of cell death. Docetaxel, however, appears to be more potent at inhibiting angiogenesis, with an IC(50) concentration 10x less than that of paclitaxel. We conclude that these important findings should be taken in account in clinical trials where tumor angiogenesis is being targeted.

An overview of current results with the gemcitabine and docetaxel combination as initial and salvage chemotherapy regimen in advanced non-small cell lung cancer

The activity of single-agent docetaxel in patients with platinum pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been established in two recent large randomized phase III trials, either against best supportive care or versus single-agent vinorelbine/ifosfamide. Moreover, single-agent gemcitabine has demonstrated significant activity and clinical benefit in platinum- and paclitaxel-pretreated advanced NSCLC. Combination regimens employing these two agents in various doses and schedules have recently been initiated. The gemcitabine/docetaxel combination with or without G-CSF support as salvage therapy of NSCLC pre-treated with platinum+/-paclitaxel-based regimens has been evaluated in four recently published phase II clinical studies and has been shown to represent a tolerable and active regimen in this setting, yielding a 10-33% response rate, thus, warranting randomized comparisons to single-agent gemcitabine or docetaxel, drugs currently recommended in second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC.

Weekly low-dose docetaxel in advanced non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with two chemotherapy regimens

BACKGROUND

The role of salvage chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still controversial, but the recent development of a number of active antineoplastic agents has created new possibilities for disease management. The aim of this study was to evaluate the activity and safety of weekly docetaxel treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC previously treated with two chemotherapy regimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study involved 26 patients with histologically documented stage IIIB, IV or recurrent metastatic NSCLC previously treated with two non-taxane based-chemotherapy regimens. They all received docetaxel 25 mg/m(2)/week administered as a 1-h infusion in an outpatient setting with corticosteroid premedication.

RESULTS

Fourteen of the 26 patients (54%) had distant metastases and 12 (46%) chest-localised disease. Six patients (23%; confidence interval: 9.8-44.1%) showed a partial response, 8 (31%) stable disease, and 12 (46%) progressive disease. The median time to progression was 4 months (range 2-8), and the median survival was 7+ months (range 3-13+). There were no statistically significant differences between the global quality of life scores recorded at baseline and those recorded after subsequent cycles. The treatment was very well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study suggest that weekly low-dose docetaxel is effective, well tolerated and maintains a relatively good quality of life in patients with advanced NSCLC previously exposed to two chemotherapy regimens.

Second-line chemotherapy in relapsing or refractory patients with non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

A comprehensive review of the literature on the efficacy of antitumor agents either alone or in combination as second-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cancer was undertaken.

RESULTS

An increasing number of patients with advanced NSCLC who progress or fail to respond to front-line chemotherapy are young and in good performance status, requiring further treatment. Since advanced NSCLC is an incurable and fatal disease, the aims of second-line chemotherapy should be the palliation of the symptoms and, probably, the improvement of survival. Docetaxel, gemcitabine, irinotecan and paclitaxel have shown a promising activity as second-line treatment in patients with NSCLC, and several phase II studies of regimens associating either these drugs or these drugs with CDDP and ifosfamide have shown objective responses ranging from 15 to 25% and a median survival ranging from 4 to 8 months. Two randomized trials have clearly demonstrated that single agent docetaxel in the second line setting confers a survival benefit and an improvement of both the quality of life and the control of tumor-related symptoms establishing, thus, the role of docetaxel as standard treatment for relapsing or refractory patients with NSCLC.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing evidence from both phase II and III studies seems to indicate that second-line chemotherapy may confer a survival benefit in a selected group of patients with advanced NSCLC.

The Role of Docetaxel in Nonplatinum-Based Combination Chemotherapy for non—small-Cell Lung Cancer

A number of newer chemotherapeutic agents including docetaxel, gemcitabine, irinotecan, and vinorelbine have demonstrated substantial activity in the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Their palliative role as single agents and in combination with platinum has been well defined in NSCLC. More recently, combining these agents without platinum has been the primary objective of numerous worldwide clinical trials. Two of these docetaxel/nonplatinum-based combinations have demonstrated comparable activity to platinum-based regimens in randomized trials. While platinum-based chemotherapy remains an important therapy for treatment of NSCLC, nonplatinum combinations may be a reasonable alternative for patients. These docetaxel/nonplatinum combinations warrant further evaluation in randomized trials to define their optimal role as standard therapy for NSCLC.

Second-line chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

The role of second-line chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have relapsed or failed to respond to first-line treatment was unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of any second-line chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Bibliographic databases were searched. Handsearching and contact with experts was also performed.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled clinical trials in which any second-line chemotherapy was compared with BSC in patients with NSCLC who had previously failed to any previous chemotherapy regimen.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data was extracted by 2 independent reviewers and revised by all authors.

MAIN RESULTS

Only one study was included. It randomised 204 patients to receive either doxetaxel or BSC. Following an unacceptably high toxic death rate the dose of doxetaxel was reduced from 100 mg/m(2) to 75 mg/m(2). Doxetaxel gave an extra 2.4 months of survival - an average of 7.0 months vs 4.6 months on BSC. At 1 year after diagnosis 29% of doxetaxel treated patients were alive compared with 19% of the BSC group.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Definitive recommendations cannot be made since evidence is only available from one randomised controlled trial which, though of reasonable quality, had a number of limitations. There is currently no evidence to support second-line treatment of patients with poor performance status. Larger, well-designed controlled trials are needed to further evaluate whether the benefits of second-line chemotherapy to patients with NSCLC outweigh its risks and costs.