Impact of treatment interruptions due to toxicity on outcome of patients with early stage (I/II) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with hyperfractionated radiation therapy alone

Prediction of Radiotherapy Compliance in Elderly Cancer Patients Using an Internally Validated Decision Tree

This study aims to analyze the relationship between the available variables and treatment compliance in elderly cancer patients treated with radiotherapy and to establish a decision tree model to guide caregivers in their decision-making process. For this purpose, 456 patients over 74 years of age who received radiotherapy between 2005 and 2017 were included in this retrospective analysis. The outcome of interest was radiotherapy compliance, determined by whether patients completed their scheduled radiotherapy treatment (compliance means they completed their treatment and noncompliance means they did not). A bootstrap (B = 400) technique was implemented to select the best tuning parameters to establish the decision tree. The developed decision tree uses patient status, the Charlson comorbidity index, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance scale, age, sex, cancer type, health insurance status, radiotherapy aim, and fractionation type (conventional fractionation versus hypofractionation) to distinguish between compliant and noncompliant patients. The decision tree's mean area under the curve and 95% confidence interval was 0.71 (0.66-0.77). Although external validation is needed to determine the decision tree's clinical usefulness, its discriminating ability was moderate and it could serve as an aid for caregivers to select the optimal treatment for elderly cancer patients.

Prognostic Impact of Missed Chemotherapy Doses During Chemoradiation Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of missed chemotherapy administrations (MCA) on the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with definitive chemoradiation therapy (CRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 97 patients with NSCLC treated with definitive CRT were assessed for MCA due to toxicities. Logistic regression was used to determine factors associated with MCA. Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox Proportional Hazards models were conducted.

RESULTS

MCA occurred in 39% (n=38) of the patients. Median overall survival was 9.6 months for patients with MCA compared with 24.3 months for those receiving all doses (P=0.004). MCA due to decline in performance status was associated with the worst survival (4.6 mo) followed by allergic reaction (10.0 mo), hematologic toxicity (11 mo), and esophagitis (17.2 mo, P=0.027). In multivariate models, MCA was associated with higher mortality (hazard ratio, 1.97; P=0.01) and worse progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 1.96; P=0. 009).

CONCLUSIONS

MCA correlated with worse prognosis and increased mortality. Methods to reduce toxicity may improve administration of all chemotherapy doses and increase overall survival in NSCLC treated with CRT.

Management of normal tissue toxicity associated with chemoradiation (primary skin, esophagus, and lung)

Nearly one quarter of patients with lung cancer present with locally advanced disease where concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the current standard of care for patients with good performance status. Cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy consistently showed an improvement in survival compared with sequential chemoradiotherapy, at the expense of an increase in the toxicity profile. Over the past decades, several encouraging biomarkers such as transforming growth factor-beta and radioprotective agents such as amifostine were studied but without reaching approval for patient care. We reviewed the prevalence and risk factors for different adverse effects associated with the combined chemoradiotherapy modality, especially dermatitis, mucositis, esophagitis, and pneumonitis. These adverse effects can further be divided into acute, subacute, and chronic. Dermatitis is usually rare and responds well to topical steroids and usual skin care. Acute esophagitis occurs in 30% of patients and is treated with proton pump inhibitors, promotility agents, local anesthetic, and dietary changes. Radiation pneumonitis is a subacute complication seen in 15% of patients and is usually managed with steroids. Chronic adverse effects such as radiation fibrosis and esophageal stricture occur approximately 6 months after completion of radiation therapy and are usually permanent. In this review, complications of chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced lung cancer are delineated, and approaches to their management are described. Given that treatment interruption is associated with a worse outcome, patients are aggressively treated with a curative intent. Therefore, planning for treatment adverse effects improves patient tolerance, compliance, and outcome.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for stage III (N2/3) non-small-cell lung cancer: a review of prospective studies

SUMMARY Trimodality therapy, a maximal combination of chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgical resection, for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer promises improved outcomes through optimizing local, regional and distant control. Phase II trials of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy have explored a number of different radiotherapy dose and fractionation schemes, and have identified an important subset of patients who achieve mediastinal nodal clearance and may achieve long-term survival. Phase III trials of various combinations of chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery have demonstrated mixed results with regard to each modality’s impact on progression-free or overall survival. In this review, we focus on the historical lessons learned from prospective trials of trimodality therapy completed over the last 30 years and set the stage for future studies of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer.

Protecting pediatric oncology patients from influenza

Influenza is a common respiratory pathogen. Its severity can be unpredictable, but people with chronic illness are at increased risk of severe infection, complications, and death from influenza. This review examines evidence to support various strategies to protect pediatric oncology patients from influenza-related morbidity. Influenza vaccination should be considered standard. Additional evidence-supported measures include antiviral treatment, antiviral prophylaxis, cohorting of patients, and hospital infection control measures. Data from other high-risk populations support the vaccination of family members, double-dose or high-dose vaccination, and the use of barrier methods. These measures have the potential to optimize patient outcomes because there will be fewer treatment interruptions for acute illness. These strategies can also protect patients from prolonged hospitalizations and morbidity related to influenza.

Interruptions of once-daily thoracic radiotherapy do not correlate with outcomes in limited stage small cell lung cancer: analysis of CALGB phase III trial 9235

PURPOSE

Retrospective data suggests prolonging the time to complete thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) may negatively impact tumor control and survival in limited stage small cell lung cancer (LSCLC). We examined the association between TRT duration and outcomes on a prospective phase III study.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This review included 267 patients who received protocol TRT on a phase III CALGB LSCLC study assessing the addition of tamoxifen to standard chemo-radiotherapy. TRT, to a planned dose of 50Gy in 2Gy daily fractions, was initiated with the fourth chemotherapy cycle. TRT interruptions were mandated for hematologic toxicity (granulocytes<1000/mm3 or platelets<75,000/mm3) and esophageal toxicity (dysphagia necessitating intravenous hydration).

RESULTS

TRT interruptions > or =3 days occurred in 115 patients (43%), most frequently during the 4th week of TRT, and did not differ between treatment arms. Hematologic toxicity and esophageal toxicity were the most frequent indications for interrupting TRT. Variables including advanced age (>70 years), gender, race, or radiotherapy treatment volume did not predict for TRT interruptions. Overall survival (OS) and local tumor control did not correlate with the administration of TRT interruptions or with TRT duration.

CONCLUSION

Toxicity mandated interruptions of conventional dose, once-daily, TRT may not adversely affect outcomes for patients receiving TRT concurrent with chemotherapy (cycle 4) for LSCLC. The implications for accelerated or high dose TRT regimens are not clear.

Beyond the Traditional Prognostic Indicators: The Impact of Primary Care Utilization on Cancer Survival

Purpose

To our knowledge to date, the effect of primary care utilization on health outcomes in cancer patients has not been described. The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of primary care utilization within 6 months of cancer diagnosis on survival in patients with lung cancer.

Patients and Methods

We used electronic medical record data (1997 to 2005) to identify male veterans with incident lung cancers (N = 323). Primary care utilization was assessed in the 6 months after cancer diagnosis. Patients were observed from cancer diagnosis to death or to last date of health care utilization (ie, censoring date). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models tested whether primary care utilization was associated with improved survival. Multivariate analyses adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics.

Results

During an average follow-up of 16.6 months, 259 patients died. In multivariate analysis, the risk of death was 36% (hazard ratio [HR], 0.64; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.90), 56% (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.65), and 57% (HR, 0.43; 05% CI, 0.29 to 0.64) lower for patients who had one, two, or at least three primary care visits, respectively, in the first 6 months after cancer diagnosis as compared with those without primary care utilization. The median survival duration (P < .0001, log-rank test) was 3.68, 7.52, 13.88, and 13.75 months for patients with no, one, two, or at least three primary care visits, respectively.

Conclusion

Primary care utilization in the early phase of cancer treatment has a marked effect that results in a reduced mortality risk in patients with incident lung cancer. Additional research is required to determine how and why primary care utilization is an important prognostic indicator of prolonged survival in patients with lung cancer.

Palliative care in lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition)

GOALS/OBJECTIVES: To review the scientific evidence on symptoms and specific complications that are associated with lung cancer, and the methods available to palliate those symptoms and complications.

METHODS

MEDLINE literature review (through March 2006) for all studies published in the English language, including case series and case reports, since 1966 using the following medical subject heading terms: bone metastases; brain metastases; cough; dyspnea; electrocautery; hemoptysis; interventional bronchoscopy; laser; pain management; pleural effusions; spinal cord metastases; superior vena cava syndrome; and tracheoesophageal fistula.

RESULTS

Pulmonary symptoms that may require palliation in patients who have lung cancer include those caused by the primary cancer itself (dyspnea, wheezing, cough, hemoptysis, chest pain), or locoregional metastases within the thorax (superior vena cava syndrome, tracheoesophageal fistula, pleural effusions, ribs, and pleura). Respiratory symptoms can also result from complications of lung cancer treatment or from comorbid conditions. Constitutional symptoms are common and require attention and care. Symptoms referable to distant extrathoracic metastases to bone, brain, spinal cord, and liver pose additional problems that require a specific response for optimal symptom control. There are excellent scientific data regarding the management of many of these issues, with lesser evidence from case series or expert opinion on other aspects of providing palliative care for lung cancer patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Palliation of symptoms and complications in lung cancer patients is possible, and physicians who provide such care must be knowledgeable about these issues.

Effects of prolongation of overall treatment time due to unplanned interruptions during radiotherapy of different tumor sites and practical methods for compensation

The prescribed total radiation dose should be administered within a specific time. In daily clinical practice, however, unplanned treatment interruptions resulting in prolongation of the overall treatment time are predictable. The present review evaluated the existing published data regarding the affect of the prolongation of the overall treatment time on the tumor control rate and outcome of patients with head-and-neck, lung, and uterine cervical cancer and other treatment sites. In most studies, including the planned interruption (split-course) schedules, as well as the retrospective studies analyzing the role of overall treatment time, a detrimental effect from the treatment break on the outcome was evident. This is suggestive of the deleterious effect of accelerated repopulation of tumor clonogens. In particular for the cancers of the head and neck for which the evidence is the strongest for such a consequence, even a 1-day interruption resulted in a decrease in the local control rate by 1.4%. Although the increased number of gaps was associated with a negative outcome, the data are contradictory concerning the effect of the number of gaps. The main recommendation is to exert all efforts to retain the planned irradiation schedule; however, existing data have shown that interruptions that effect the programmed time-course for irradiation need to be compensated for. This is to ensure biologic equivalence in treatment efficacy compared with uninterrupted regimens with respect to cancer site and stage. Practical methods for compensation using radiobiologic modeling and their limitations are also discussed.

Factors important for efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy of medically inoperable stage I lung cancer. A retrospective analysis of patients treated in the Nordic countries

We reviewed results of SBRT treatment of 138 patients with medically inoperable stage I NSCLC treated during 1996-2003 at five different centres in Sweden and Denmark. Mean age was 74 years (range 56-90) with 69 men and 72 women. SBRT was delivered using a 3D conformal multifield technique and a stereotactic body frame. Doses delivered were 30-48 Gy (65% isodose at the periphery of planning target volume, PTV) in 2-4 fractions. Equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) was in the range of 50-100 Gy. Mean gross tumour volume (GTV) was 39 cm3 (2-436), and planning target volume was 101 cm3 (11-719). Overall response rate (CR, PR) was 61% (84/138). SD was noted in 36% (50/138). During a median follow-up period of 33 months (1-107), 16 (12%) local failures occurred, ten of which also included distant metastases. Local failure was associated with tumour size, target definition and central or pleura proximity. Distant metastases occurred in 25% (35/138) of the patients. Ninety-one (65%) patients died during follow-up of which 55 patients (60%) died of other causes than lung cancer. Three- and 5-year overall survival was 52 and 26% respectively. Lung cancer specific 3- and 5-year overall survival was 66 and 40% respectively. Fifty nine percent (83/138) of the patients had no side effects. Fourteen patients experienced grade 3-4 toxicity according to radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG). EQD2 (> v.s.<55.6 Gy) showed a statistically significant benefit survival for the higher doses. SBRT for stage I NSCLC results in favourable local control not inferior to fractionated RT and with acceptable toxicity.

Amifostine reduces side effects and improves complete response rate during radiotherapy: Results of a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of amifostine in diminishing radiotherapy side effects and whether or not it protects the tumor.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of 14 included randomized controlled trials, comprising 1451 patients, comparing the use of radiotherapy vs. radiotherapy plus amifostine for cancer treatment.

RESULTS

The use of amifostine significantly reduced the risk of developing mucositis (odds ratio [OR], 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-0.48; p < 0.00001), esophagitis (OR, 0.38; CI, 0.26-0.54; p < 0.00001), acute xerostomia (OR, 0.24; CI, 0.15-0.36; p < 0.00001), late xerostomia (OR, 0.33; CI, 0.21-0.51; p < 0.00001), dysphagia (OR, 0.26; CI, 0.07-0.92; p = 0.04), acute pneumonitis (OR, 0.15; CI, 0.07-0.31; p < 0.00001) and cystitis (OR, 0.17; CI, 0.09-0.32; p < 0.00001). There was no difference in overall response rate between the groups. However, complete response rate was superior for patients using amifostine (OR, 1.81; CI, 1.10-2.96; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review shows that amifostine significantly reduces the side effects of radiation therapy. The efficacy of radiotherapy was not itself affected by the use of this drug and patients receiving amifostine were able to achieve higher rates of complete response.

Concurrent hyperfractionated radiotherapy and low-dose daily carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with early-stage (I/II) non-small-cell lung cancer: long-term results of a phase II study

PURPOSE

Feasibility and activity of concurrent hyperfractionated radiotherapy (Hfx RT) and low-dose, daily carboplatin and paclitaxel were investigated in patients with early-stage (I/II) non-small-cell lung cancer in a phase II study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifty-six patients started their treatment on day 1 with 30 mg/m2 of paclitaxel. Hfx RT using 1.3 Gy bid to a total dose of 67.6 Gy and concurrent low-dose daily carboplatin 25 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 10 mg/m2, both given Mondays through Fridays during the RT course, started from the second day.

RESULTS

There were 29 complete responses (52%) and 15 partial responses (27%), and 12 patients (21%), experienced stable disease. The median survival time was 35 months, and 3- and 5-year survival rates were 50% and 36%, respectively. The median time to local progression has not been achieved, but 3- and 5-year local progression-free survival rates were 56% and 54%, respectively. The median time to distant metastasis has not been achieved, but 3- and 5- year distant metastasis-free survival rates were 61% and 61%, respectively. The median and 5-year cause-specific survivals were 39 months and 43%, respectively. Acute high-grade (> 3) toxicity was hematologic (22%), esophageal (7%), or bronchopulmonary (7%). No grade 5 toxicity was observed. Late high-grade toxicity was rarely observed (total, 10%).

CONCLUSION

Hfx RT and concurrent low-dose daily carboplatin/paclitaxel was feasible with low toxicity and effective in patients with stage I/II non-small-cell lung cancer. It should continue to be investigated for this disease.

Radiation pneumonitis and pulmonary fibrosis in non-small-cell lung cancer: pulmonary function, prediction, and prevention

Although radiotherapy improves locoregional control and survival in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, radiation pneumonitis is a common treatment-related toxicity. Many pulmonary function tests are not significantly altered by pulmonary toxicity of irradiation, but reductions in D(L(CO)), the diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide, are more commonly associated with pneumonitis. Several patient-specific factors (e.g. age, smoking history, tumor location, performance score, gender) and treatment-specific factors (e.g. chemotherapy regimen and dose) have been proposed as potential predictors of the risk of radiation pneumonitis, but these have not been consistently demonstrated across different studies. The risk of radiation pneumonitis also seems to increase as the cumulative dose of radiation to normal lung tissue increases, as measured by dose-volume histograms. However, controversy persists about which dosimetric parameter optimally predicts the risk of radiation pneumonitis, and whether the volume of lung or the dose of radiation is more important. Radiation oncologists ought to consider these dosimetric factors when designing radiation treatment plans for all patients who receive thoracic radiotherapy. Newer radiotherapy techniques and technologies may reduce the exposure of normal lung to irradiation. Several medications have also been evaluated for their ability to reduce radiation pneumonitis in animals and humans, including corticosteroids, amifostine, ACE inhibitors or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers, pentoxifylline, melatonin, carvedilol, and manganese superoxide dismutase-plasmid/liposome. Additional research is warranted to determine the efficacy of these medications and identify nonpharmacologic strategies to predict and prevent radiation pneumonitis.

Multimodality Therapy for Stage III Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

The treatment of stage III non–small-cell lung cancer has evolved over the last two decades, with combined-modality therapy the current standard of care. As a result, intermediate and long-term survival has improved for patients in this common stage category, compared to the poor outcomes achieved with the historical standard of once-daily radiation therapy alone. This review summarizes two decades of clinical research regarding bimodality and trimodality approaches for the heterogenous stage subsets within the stage III designation, discusses the rationale and status of prophylactic brain irradiation, and concludes with perspectives on progress and future directions. Chemotherapy plus radiotherapy given concurrently is the optimal treatment for the group of patients with advanced stage III disease. The potential role of a surgical resection following chemotherapy (with or without radiation) in this setting is still controversial. The only subsets for which trimodality treatments are clearly preferred include T4N0-1 disease and superior sulcus tumors. The other major stage III subgroup has a minimal disease burden with low tumor volume and/or microscopic N2 disease, thus technically could undergo a surgical resection upfront. Induction chemotherapy before surgery may yield a survival advantage, although the phase III trials in this area are not conclusive. Given the marked survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery in even earlier stages of non–small-cell lung cancer, the proper sequence of surgery and chemotherapy (before v after surgery) remains an important unresolved question in this subgroup. Furthermore, how to incorporate radiation therapy, as well as whether it should be given at all in this subset of patients, are other important issues actively under study in ongoing trials.

Stereotactic hypofractionated radiation therapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer

We reviewed our initial institutional experience with the use of stereotactic hypofractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) in patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Thirty patients with inoperable stage I non-small cell lung cancer due to a severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and/or chronic heart disease (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2) were treated between December 2000 and October 2003 with SFRT in curative intent. Infiltration of locoregional lymph nodes and distant metastases were ruled out by computerized tomography (CT) scan of the brain, thorax, and abdomen, and by whole body FDG-positron emission tomography scan in all patients. Total RT doses ranged from 24.0 to 37.5 Gy, given in 3-5 fractions to the 60% isodose encompassing the planning target volume. Immobilization was carried out by a vacuum couch and a low-pressure foil. The clinical target volume was the tumor as it appeared in lung windowing on lung CT scan. Organ movements (caused by breathing; range, 6-22 mm) and reproducibility of patient positioning in the couch (range, 3-12 mm) were calculated by sequential CT and orthogonal films. The individual values were taken into account as a safety margin for the definition of the planning target volume (PTV). The median follow-up of living patients is 18 months (range, 6-38 months). As maximum response, there were 10 (33%) complete responses (CRs) and 14 (47%) partial responses (PRs), resulting in a total response rate of 80%. Stable disease was observed in 6 (20%) patients, while no patient experienced progressive disease. During follow-up, 2 (7%) local recurrences were observed (after 17 and 18 months, respectively). Of 5 (17%) patients who developed distant metastasis, 1 patient developed it in liver (3 months), another one in brain (6 months), and another one in the lung (36 months), while 2 patients developed it in mediastinal lymph nodes (after 8, and 11 months, respectively) only. Of 9 (30%) patients who have died, only 3 (10%) died of cancer, while 6 (20%) died of cancer-unrelated or unknown causes. Acute side effects were mild and affected 9 (33%) patients during the RT course (fatigue being the most frequent one in 6 patients). There were 22 acute events occurring in 19 (63%) patients during the first 3 months post-SFRT, the most frequent one being pneumonitis observed in 14 (46%) patients. However, there was only one (3%) grade 3 acute toxicity and no patient experienced greater than grade 3 toxicity during this study. One (3%) patient experienced rib fracture as the late event. SFRT is a feasible and safe treatment method in inoperable patients with stage I NSCLC having reduced lung capacity. Longer follow-up is necessary to get robust data on late toxicity as well as survival.

[Delays and treatment interruptions: difficulties in administering radiotherapy in an ideal time-period]

Prescribed total radiation dose should be administered within in a specific time-frame and delays in commencing treatment and/or unplanned interruptions in radiation delivery are unacceptable because, in certain cancer sites, treatment-time prolongation can have a deleterious effect on local tumour control, and on patient outcomes. The present review evaluated the causes of initial treatment delays as well as interruptions in the scheduled radiotherapy. The literature search highlighted a significant concern in avoiding treatment-time prolongation in head and neck, cervix, breast and lung cancer. Among the causes involved in delay in radiotherapy commencement factors such as waiting lists, lack of material and human resources, and an increase complexity in planning, simulation and verification are highlighted. Most authors recommend radiotherapy commencement as soon as possible in radical (exclusive irradiation with active tumour present) and palliative situations with a maximum delay of no more than 6 to 8 weeks in the case of adjuvant radiotherapy (post-resection) programs. Interruptions during the course of treatment include: planned unit maintenance and servicing, acute patient toxicity or unexpected malfunction of linear accelerators; this last feature has the most deleterious effect on patients as well as radiotherapy practitioners. Interruptions that impact on the programmed time-course for radiotherapy needs to be compensated-for so as assure the biological equivalence in treatment efficacy with respect to cancer site and stage.

Hypofractionated proton beam radiotherapy for stage I lung cancer

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy and toxicity of high-dose hypofractionated proton beam radiotherapy for patients with clinical stage I lung cancer.

DESIGN

A prospective phase 2 clinical trial.

SETTING

Loma Linda University Medical Center.

PATIENTS

Subjects with clinical stage I non-small cell lung cancer who were medically inoperable or refused surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients were treated with proton beam radiotherapy. The target included the gross tumor volume as seen on CT scan, with additional margin to allow for respiratory motion. A multibeam treatment plan was generated. Delivered treatment was 51 cobalt Gray equivalent (CGE) in 10 fractions over 2 weeks to the initial 22 patients; the subsequent 46 patients received 60 CGE in 10 fractions over 2 weeks.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients were analyzed for this report, with a median follow-up time of 30 months. No cases of symptomatic radiation pneumonitis or late esophageal or cardiac toxicity were seen. The 3-year local control and disease-specific survival rates were 74%, and 72%, respectively. There was significant improvement in local tumor control in T1 vs T2 tumors (87% vs 49%), with a trend toward improved survival. Cox regression analysis revealed that patients with higher performance status, female gender, and smaller tumor sizes had significantly improved survival.

CONCLUSION

High-dose hypofractionated proton beam radiotherapy can be administered safely, with minimal toxicity, to patients with stage I lung cancer. Local tumor control appears to be improved when compared to historical results utilizing conventional radiotherapy, with a good expectation of disease-specific survival 3 years following treatment.