A retroviral peptide encoded by mutated env p15E gene is recognized by specific CD8+ T lymphocytes on drug-treated murine mastocytoma P815

Cancer neoepitopes viewed through negative selection and peripheral tolerance: a new path to cancer vaccines

A proportion of somatic mutations in tumors create neoepitopes that can prime T cell responses that target the MHC I-neoepitope complexes on tumor cells, mediating tumor control or rejection. Despite the compelling centrality of neoepitopes to cancer immunity, we know remarkably little about what constitutes a neoepitope that can mediate tumor control in vivo and what distinguishes such a neoepitope from the vast majority of similar candidate neoepitopes that are inefficacious in vivo. Studies in mice as well as clinical trials have begun to reveal the unexpected paradoxes in this area. Because cancer neoepitopes straddle that ambiguous ground between self and non-self, some rules that are fundamental to immunology of frankly non-self antigens, such as viral or model antigens, do not appear to apply to neoepitopes. Because neoepitopes are so similar to self-epitopes, with only small changes that render them non-self, immune response to them is regulated at least partially the way immune response to self is regulated. Therefore, neoepitopes are viewed and understood here through the clarifying lens of negative thymic selection. Here, the emergent questions in the biology and clinical applications of neoepitopes are discussed critically and a mechanistic and testable framework that explains the complexity and translational potential of these wonderful antigens is proposed.

Tumor immunotherapy: drug-induced neoantigens (xenogenization) and immune checkpoint inhibitors

More than 40 years ago, we discovered that novel transplantation antigens can be induced in vivo or in vitro by treating murine leukemia with dacarbazine. Years later, this phenomenon that we called "Chemical Xenogenization" (CX) and more recently, "Drug-Induced Xenogenization" (DIX), was reproduced by Thierry Boon with a mutagenic/carcinogenic compound (i.e. N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine). In both cases, the molecular bases of DIX rely on mutagenesis induced by methyl adducts to oxygen-6 of DNA guanine. In the present review we illustrate the main DIX-related immune-pharmacodynamic properties of triazene compounds of clinical use (i.e. dacarbazine and temozolomide).In recent years, tumor immunotherapy has come back to the stage with the discovery of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICpI) that show an extraordinary immune-enhancing activity. Here we illustrate the salient biochemical features of some of the most interesting ICpI and the up-to-day status of their clinical use. Moreover, we illustrate the literature showing the direct relationship between somatic mutation burden and susceptibility of cancer cells to host's immune responses.When DIX was discovered, we were not able to satisfactorily exploit the possible presence of triazene-induced neoantigens in malignant cells since no device was available to adequately enhance host's immune responses in clinical settings. Today, ICpI show unprecedented efficacy in terms of survival times, especially when elevated mutation load is associated with cancer cells. Therefore, in the future, mutation-dependent neoantigens obtained by appropriate pharmacological intervention appear to disclose a novel approach for enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of ICpI in cancer patients.

Novel role of triazenes in haematological malignancies: pilot study of Temozolomide, Lomeguatrib and IL-2 in the chemo-immunotherapy of acute leukaemia

Previous studies indicated that dacarbazine and Temozolomide could be highly effective against refractory acute leukaemia. Their activity relies mainly on the generation of methyl adducts at the O(6)-position of guanine in DNA. High levels of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) or a defective mismatch repair (MMR) system, are associated with cellular resistance to triazenes. The MGMT inhibitor, O(6)-(4-bromothenyl)guanine (Lomeguatrib), can restore in vitro sensitivity to Temozolomide in MMR-proficient blasts. In the early 1970s we discovered that, in vivo, triazene compounds induce the appearance of novel transplantation antigens in murine leukaemia ("Chemical Xenogenization", CX). Non-self peptides presented by class I MHC molecules are generated by triazene-induced somatic mutations, affecting retroviral sequences that are detectable in the mouse genome. Moreover, preliminary experiments suggested that human cancer cells can also undergo CX. Therefore, we designed a chemo-immunotherapy strategy in leukaemic patients as follows: (a) cytoreduction and a hypothetical CX phase, i.e. treatment with Lomeguatrib (to suppress MGMT activity) and Temozolomide (to kill sensitive blasts and to presumably induce CX in resistant leukaemic cells); (b) immune response recovery phase using interleukin-2 (to possibly restore an immune response and take advantage of the hypothetical, triazene-induced CX). Here we present the results of pilot study which is in progress in patients with refractory/relapsed acute leukaemia. In all tested cases, Lomeguatrib suppressed MGMT activity in vivo. Six out of eight patients showed partial or complete disappearance of blast cells in peripheral blood or in bone marrow. We observed severe and long-lasting myelosuppression, accompanied by limited non-haematological toxicity. Up to now, two patients are alive (after 9 and 10 months, respectively), four died of opportunistic infections and two of progressive disease. This investigation confirms the potential role of triazenes in leukaemia and highlights the contribution of Lomeguatrib in overcoming drug resistance. Further studies are required to establish whether Temozolomide can induce CX in human leukaemia, and thus offer a new approach to control minimal residual disease.

Use of xenogenized (modified) tumor cells for treatment in experimental tumor and in human neoplasia

The need to modify tumor cells in order to render them more "immunogenic" was based on the assumption that normal, nonmodified tumor cells are non- or weakly immunogenic and as such are unable to raise an efficient protective immune response. Various methods for "xenogenization" (modification of tumor cells) were suggested: induction of new foreign antigens, treatment with either chemicals or enzymes and use of mutagens. Xenogenized tumor cells by their coupling to proteins, and use of chemicals like DTIC (5-[3,3-dimethyl- 1-triazeno]-imidazole-4-carboxamide), TZC (8-carbamoyl-3-methyl-imidazo[5, 1-d]- 1,2,3,5-tetrazin-4 [3H]-one 8-carbamoyl-3-[2-chloroethyl] imidazole [5,1 -d]- 1,2,3,5-tetrazin-4[3H]-one) and antiemetic drugs, were tested in experimental models of murine leukemia. Non-tumorigenic clones, xenogenization with DNA hypomethylating agents, aryl-triazine derivatives and DTIC were evaluated for their induction of protective immune response in murine lymphoma. Murine plasmacytoma cells were used for immunization after treatment with glutaraldehyde. Viral modifications of tumor cells were evaluated for their ability to induce a protective tumor response in model systems of rat fibrosarcoma, liver metastatic rat tumor cells, lymphoid tumor cells and hamster tumor cells. In the case of human cancer, attempts were reported to use DNP-conjugated melanoma cells, mutagenic triazine compounds, an autologous colon tumor cell bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccine and genetically engineered vaccines for immunization. The general conclusion drawn from experimental tumor models and for human cancer is, that although modified tumor cells were found to be partially effective in experimental models, it is still necessary to provide more data in order to determine the effective use of xenogenized human tumor cells for immunotherapy.

Circulating levels of IL-10 are critically related to growth and rejection patterns of murine mastocytoma cells

Previously tumorigenic P815 tumor cells are rejected by histocompatible mice after transfection with a mutated retroviral gene, and the host is made resistant to subsequent challenge with tumorigenic (control) cells transfected with the nonmutated sequence. To functionally characterize the class I-restricted response to the tumor cell vaccine, we have assessed the in vitro (by CD8+ cells) and in vivo production of type 1 or type 2 cytokines in mice injected with either type of transfected P815 derivative. IL-12 and IL-10 were selectively or preferentially expressed by the regressor mice, and this correlated with the detection of functional type 1 reactivity in vivo (i.e., delayed-type hypersensitivity). Other cytokines were produced by the regressor mice only in vitro (IFN-gamma) or were not detected at all with either type of tumor recipient (IL-4). By means of monoclonal antibody-mediated neutralization or enhancement of endogenous cytokine levels, IL-10 was found to serve an important role in the growth and rejection patterns of the transfected P815 derivatives. In addition to previous evidence for an IL-12 requirement in promoting anti-P815 reactivity, these data establish IL-10 as an important cytokine in permitting optimal expression of this reactivity, which apparently develops in the absence of a strong bias toward a type 1 or type 2 cytokine response.